Al Qaeda's planning major terror attack, promises to get the West

The Islamic group calling itself Al Qaeda has once again set up an HQ in southern Afghanistan where it will plan major terrorist attacks against the infidel West, The Daily Telegraph wrote.

The group of fighters for Allah had been hiding in Pakistan's tribal belt for over a decade but have now moved back into southern Afghanistan now that we and the British moved out at the end of 2014, proving that given a vacuum, Al Qaeda still sucks.

One Afghan official who will remain anonymous due to his extremely long string of names the first of which is Muhammad, said, "Al Qaeda has taken advantage of the withdrawal of Western troops to re-establish its headquarters in southern Afghanistan. Now they are back the will be determined to use Afghanistan as a base to prepare new attacks against Western targets."

Target believes the reason for the attacks is due to their liberal transgender bathroom policy which, in Islamic states is punishable by death. Other than that, Target had no comment.

A US drone strike destroyed Taliban leader Mullah Akhtar Mansour in Pakistan. The strike was denounced by Pakistan who said it was a violation of their religious beliefs to kill a jihadist. This is why they hid Osama bin Laden, they said. "He was a good Muslim," an anonymous source told The Telegraph about Osama.

AQ terrorist cells are operating around Kandahar, a place regarded as the spiritual home of the Taliban, AQ's closest closet ally and supporter in the region.

The return of AQ is a major embarrassment to both the US and the UK, but the head of the US is too narcissistic to feel embarrassed and couldn't care a fiddler's fart about winning the war there. and the head of the UK still believes Islam is the religion of peace.


Tweet

UK knows the Muslim bros

Europe, particularly the UK, seems to be waking up, finally. According to FoxNews.com, the UK is accusing the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) of "being sympathetic to terrorists and a risk to British national security." Ya think?

Of course, this is in sharp contrast to the Obama administration who has the MB to the White House for tea, crumpets and strategy talks. Some say the U.S. needs to wake up to the threat of the MB, but I am fairly certain they know exactly with whom they are dealing.

And that is the real scary part.

An internal review of the MB was ordered by Prime Minister David Cameron. The findings of the report, according to Nile Gardiner, director of the Heritage Foundation's Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom are "a damning indictment of the Muslim Brotherhood, and it's a very realistic assessment of the nature of the Brotherhood itself." He went on to tell FoxNews.com "The British government has taken a far more serious approach compared to the Obama administration's."

While some of the report is classified, some have been ordered by Cameron to be made public.

What the findings basically show is that the MB puts on a "front" by renouncing violence, but in reality they have defended Hamas' terrorist attacks on Israelis and have even justified attacks against coalition forces in the U.S. and Afghanistan.

But like the "crazy-making" parents of a schizophrenic child, the MB leaders have made claims that the 9-11 attacks were fabricated by the United States government in order to justify our attacks on Muslim countries. Alex Jones would be proud of them, I suspect.

The report says that even though the MB prefers non-violent strategies on the grounds of expediency, "they are prepared to countenance violence--including, from time to time, terrorism--where gradualism is ineffective."

Egypt declared the MB to be a terrorist organization in December 2013. Obama, not so much.

While the West praised the Arab Spring revolutions in Egypt and beyond, when Morsi was overthrown, they were embarrassed. Thus, after this recent report, Cameron, chucking his indefatigable PC wisdom finally had enough. He told MPs that association with the MB "should be considered as a possible indicator of extremism."

Okay, so he didn't quite "chuck" his PC, but he at least made an attempt. He said the U.K. would refuse visas to those associated with the MB who have made "extremist" comments [like quoting the Koran, Mr. Cameron?].

Obama, on the other hand, pretends to be neutral. In January 2015 the State Department met with the MB's own Egyptian Freedom and Justice Party. You know, the guys who'd cut the hand off a thief or give 100 lashes to a woman whose body isn't in a bag.

Even the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper described the MB as "mostly secular." He gives "national intelligence" a whole new meaning. 

The MB is as Islamically orthodox as you can get without blowing yourself up.

In many Muslim countries one is not allowed to say Merry Christmas.

Merry Christmas.



Tweet

"US as bad as ISIS" says UK's Corbyn

He's not just a leftist and hater of free enterprise and private ownership, he's a vegetarian and now a contender of the UK's Labor Party (although they tend to spell it "Labour"). 

I'm talking about Jeremy Corbyn, a Putin-loving asshat who compared U.S. troops to ISIS. He's even more of a dhimmie than David Cameron.

 Corbyn is leading the campaign to take over Britain's Labor Party and people there are as attracted to him as flies on poop.

When the Labor Party lost the general election in May under Edward Miliband who later resigned, many figured that this left of center party would move back to the right, but they were wrong. Corbyn is now a top contender backed by the trade unions and a coalition of activists of various age groups.

This will likely have an impact on the relationship between the US and UK. I imagine Obama will cream in his jeans having another socialist buddy to commiserate with, but I don't see how it will improve relationships with normal Americans.

Corbyn compares us to those who
did this

Corbyn, like Donald Trump, has 53% approval while his nearest rival has 21%. Voting ends September 19th and results are expected on the 12th. If Corbyn wins, he will be the leader of the opposition party in Parliament and if Labor wins a majority in Parliament, the guy could become the Prime Minister.

"I think Americans should have the same concern as British audiences," says Dan Hodges, a former Labor Party adviser. "Jeremy Corbyn, if he does win, will become the most hard-left leader of a major political party in post-war British political history."

Hodges also warned, "Ideologically, he is someone who leans more toward Moscow than Washington."

In an interview on Russian television last year, Corbyn blamed the problems in Iraq on "Western meddling," and compared our troops to ISIS.

"Yes, [ISIS troops] are brutal, yes some of what they have done is quite appalling, likewise what Americans did in Fallujah and other places is appalling," Corbyn said.


Putin welcomes Corbyn's election. So too does ISIS, I suspect.

What does this mean?

First it probably means that Corbyn has never been to Fallujah or even set foot in an active war zone, otherwise he would have never given moral equivalency to ISIS. 

ISIS hangs gays

Of course war is a dirty, horrible business, and yes, some people on both sides of a war do things that go beyond the bounds of being justified. But ISIS is expected to kill infidels, children, apostates, gays, and all those people Corbyn pretends to represent and who are too ignorant, at times, to be aware of the truth regarding ISIS.

Secondly it means that the US can no longer expect the UK to "have our six" when it comes to Russia, even when it comes to sanctions for their behavior in Ukraine. Clearly a Corbyn-run UK will not support us in our efforts in the Middle East and will likely not support Israel's right to exist.

Thirdly, what it means to the UK is the fact that Corbyn wants to raise taxes and domestic spending and reintroduce the calls for state ownership of all industry, much like Bernie Sanders might try but will fail, just as Obama did.

Jeremy Corbyn is so insane that back in 1984 he invited Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams to Parliament, merely 2 weeks after Adams' IRA killed 5 people and maiming dozens more at a hotel where then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was staying.

Corbyn is so insane that he wants to scrap the UK's nuclear deterrent program and withdraw from NATO. He also welcomed Hamas and Hezbollah to Parliament and referred to them as "my friends."

This man is a danger to the country he might lead. And he isn't even a Muslim.

And he isn't even Barack Obama.




Tweet

Beheading and Halal

We are living at a time where our leaders believe that it is more important to be politically correct than it is to be actually correct. What do they need to fear--they have the relative safety of their security personnel to protect them. They don't believe they're in any danger from Islamic jihadists.

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has now picked up the role of Islamic scholar, much like Barack Obama (who actually might be one of those creatures) and John Cameron. When talking about the Islamic State, Abbott said: "This is the grim reality the world faces, now, this is why it is so important that what's being done by Daesh (Islamic State) has nothing to do with God, it has nothing to do with religion."

In philosophical terms, this is what's called "a boatload of crap."

If IS calls their behavior "jihad," and protects the reputation of their pedophile, terrorist, slave-owning, thieving prophet, because Islamic scripture demands they do, then how is this not about Islam?

For Abbott, and the rest of the Western so-called leaders who claim that Islam is a religion of peace, it is totally clear that they are more concerned with maintaining the politically correct fiction about Islam than it is to be honest and deal with the problem the Western world faces.

Beheading, or otherwise killing unbelievers, is as Halal as Campbell's soup.

Qur'an (8:12) "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."

Qur'an (8:39) "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disbelief, disorder) and religion should be only for Allah."

Qur'an (47:4) "When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks."

Qur'an (9:5--aka 'Sura of the Sword') "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate (the jizya), leave their way free to them." 

So I would ask Tony Abbott, Barack Hussein Obama, and John Cameron, what part of the Qur'an quoted above is unclear? What is IS doing that goes against Islamic scripture? And where did you learn that IS has nothing to do with God?


Tweet

Kurdish and Arab women flee, then expose who they really are

June 7, 2015: Kurdish and Arab women who escaped ISIS held territory celebrate the freedom of being individual human beings and throw off their niqabs and black abayas as the cross the border. An abaya is a long, loose coat  that covers a woman's body, while a niqab covers the face. Islamic men have been known to lose control upon the sight of women's skin.

Journalists on the border were able to document the moment 

ISIS, as you may know, are a religious group who believe that women who expose even an inch of their skin, are going against the religion of peace, and it is perfectly acceptable to kill them in an agonizing way by throwing stones at them as they are buried with only their heads exposed, or taking those heads and removing them from the body below.

Ah, but what can you do? It's their religion, even though some like Obama, Cameron and most other leaders in the West deny that ISIS is Islamic, it's all there in the good ole Koran.

But there's a "but." In Darna, Libya, the Islamic State (can't imagine where they got that name) has taken over and they made street announcements that women are now mandated to wear a veil that covers their face and to cover their [hot, alluring] hands. IS also announced that the women's "guardians," (an Islamic term used to denote any man who is not a woman and is related to the woman in any way) to prevent women from leaving the house wearing makeup.

They have also requested that all goats be kept out of the visual area of the ISIS jihadists lest they lose control.

The women in the city have one week to comply to these Koranic demands or be "severely punished." When ISIS "severely punishes" you, more often than not, you die a very painful death and are often used as a jihadist campfire.

Marshmallows, however, are un-Islamic.

Tweet

Islamic State Hammers Out a Disagreement on Christian Artifacts

Islamic State Muslims are on the march to destroy everything they can that's Christian in Iraq. The trouble is, if they're successful in Iraq, they will go on to other parts of the world.

From crosses to statues, sacred relics, and churches, nothing is out of bounds for these scum merchants of hate. But other than that, they are quite religious and can often be found reading the Koran or praying to Allah five times a day, in spite of the fact that the Obama administration and David Cameron don't believe that they are Islamic. 

Maybe they're just a bunch of disgruntled Amish.

Middle East Media Research Institute, a watchdog group, discovered a bunch of photos found on the Internet showing the group in Ninevah, Iraq, a once thriving Christian community. The goal of IS, like the goal of all Islam when taken in an orthodox manner, is to make the world a caliphate where only Islam lives. It refuses to tolerate anything but Islam, and each brand of Islam only tolerates its own brand, which is why the Sunnis hate the Shi'as. 

"They don't care what it's called; they are just following their ideology and that means getting rid of churches and minorities. It is the Islamic State, and there's no room for anyone else," MEMRI's Executive Director, Steven Stalinsky said. "This has been going on for some time, a systematic campaign to rid the region of any vestiges of Christianity."

The United Nations has condemned these acts, but the UN condemning anything immoral or unethical is a joke. Those idiots support most other forms of Islamic aggression, except when it impinges on their own country.

When IS heard about the condemnation, they laughed out loud and continued destroying everything Christian they could get their hammers on. Had there been any Jews in the area, they would have taken their hammers out on them and the UN would have remained silent.

Tweet

Obama & Cameron: "Why Won't You Leave Iran Alone?"

President Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron lectured Congress about not doing anything to reimpose sanctions on Iran because it might interfere with a deal that will keep the "hell bent on destruction of the West and all infidels elsewhere" from getting a nuclear weapon. These two men know better than the rest of us that Iran will comply with our wishes if we just give them more time not to develop nuclear weapons.

Another Beheading, Another PC POTUS

David Haines is the most recent person to be beheaded by a jihadist now known as Jihadi John. 

The jihadist Muslim speaks to the camera: "This British man has to pay the price for your promise, Cameron, to arm the Peshmerga against the Islamic State ironically he has spent a decade of his life serving under the same Royal Air Force that is responsible for delivering those arms.

"Your evil alliance with America, which continues to strike the Muslims of Iraq and most recently bombed the Haditha Dam will only accelerate your destruction and playing the role of the obedient lapdog Cameron, will only drag you and your people into another bloody and un-winnable war."

What follows is the gruesome act of beheading of a man who appears to be David Haines. 

But president Obama refuses to acknowledge the very fact that these barbaric acts are being done in the name of Islam and the quotes used to justify them comes directly from their "holy" scripture. "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" (Koran 8:12).

And that's just one of over 100 verses in the Koran that calls for fighting and/or murder of those who disbelieve, fail to convert, or refuse to pay the jizya, (a large tax placed on non-believers to help fund more Islamic fighting).

Obama has it wrong about Islam and ISIS, but I'm not certain that he is unaware of that--with all his Islamic training in Indonesia, I would be surprised if he doesn't know what's in the Koran and what the ideal of abrogation is about--that overrides the peaceful verses with those that came later and "made better" by the changes. That would explain his dislike of Israel and its leader, Netanyahu. That would describe why he refuses to refer to Nidal Hassan's jihad as Islamic terrorism but instead called it 'workplace violence.' He is covering up the truth.

It seems that if you listen to what Obama says, and then believe the opposite, you arrive at the truth.

Tweet