Canada outllaws free speech but evidently not stonings

"Islamophobia" is an invented term aimed at shutting up people who criticize the ideology of Islam. The word may have not been invented by the Muslim Brotherhood, but they sure use it to their advantage, according to Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch.

There is a resolution in Canada M-103, seeking to condemn so-called "Islamophobia," the irrational fear of Islam, beheadings and anti-Semitic ideology. It was introduced by Liberal Party MP Iqra Khalid in the House of Commons, and it sparked a controversy.

A similar motion, M-37, was later tabled in the Ontario provincial legislature by MPP Nathalie Des Rosiers on February 23, 2017. It was passed by the provincial parliament because they don't respect free speech--that is, speech that you don't like. 

M-37, like M-103, demanded lawmakers condemn "all forms of Islamophobia" and reaffirm "support for government efforts through the Anti-Racism Directorate, to address and prevent systematic racism across government policy, programs and services."

While these motions aren't legally binding thus far, extremists have started demanding them as laws. And if the Canadian government goes along with this un-Canadian demand, we will finally have sharia (Islamic law) come to Canada along with the Muslim immigrants, many of whom are fleeing to escape it. 

Eventually, there will be more Sharia if you allow even one law to go into effect. It's like the "foot-in-the-door-syndrome."

But let's be fair. If we allow for laws against "Islamophobia," then we need to make motions against "Judeophobia" and "Christianophobia" as well. That means Muslims must stop bad-mouthing the Jews and Christians, and maybe even some verses in the Qur'an will need amending since they're anti-Christian and anti-Semitic.

Of course, neither M-104 nor M-37 clearly define "Islamophobia," so we must leave it to the imagination and definition of the supposed victim(s). It can be anything they say it is.

Liberals who support this form of censorship, and likely other restrictions required by sharia law, want to blur the line between real bigotry and criticism of core problems across the Islamic world, such as the killing of apostates and gays, anti-Semitism, violence against women and minors, female genital mutilation, child marriage, unequal legal rights for women, stoning, amputation for stealing, flogging, and social taboos such as honor killing and the right to choose a husband for girls or restrict girls' education.

The liberals who claim "Islamophobia" is rampant across Canada, are either blind to what sharia is, or are hiding what sharia is--either way, sharia is unacceptable to the Western way of life, and the Islamic notion of Muslim supremacy across the earth is also unacceptable.

These issues are real concerns for millions of Muslims and human rights defenders but not to the apologists who always present the atrocities mentioned above, as acceptable "cultural norms".

Just try leaving your home as an uncovered woman in an Islamic country and see how far you get before you're beaten by the "Morality Police," an oxymoron at best.

But in the West, Muslim extremists often sell themselves as victims, like "Clock Boy," and they try to destroy whatever obstacles contradict a clearly expansionist agenda as liberals, who fail to think but instead feel, bring in more and more un-vetted immigrants because it makes them feel superior to security-minded conservatives.

Motion M-103 claimed: "Recently an infinitesimally small number of extremist individuals have conducted terrorist activities while claiming to speak for the religion of Islam."

Yes--these so-called extremists merely acted upon the suras (verses) in the Qur'an that told them to kill infidels, such as sura 9:5 or "The Sura of the Sword." But what do they know?

Do the morons who write these resolutions have any idea how many clerics rally hundreds of thousands of mujahideen around the world? Do they have a clue about the Muslim organizations that raise the call for jihad--organizations such as CAIR, ISIS, Hezbollah, Hamas, Al-Shabaab, Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Jamat e Islami, Sipah-e-Muhammad, Al Nusra, Fatah Al Islam . . . the list goes on and on.

The sales pitch for M-103 sounds like a pretty bow-wrapped package for human rights but it was a veiled endorsement of Muslim supremacist mentality. It asks to recognize the need to curb systematic racism and religious discrimination against Muslims in Canada, but there are no traces of any systematic hatred or racism against this group, or any religious group. 

Canada already has anti-discriminatory laws to curb abuse against individuals and groups--everything needed is already on the books--we don't need an "Islamophobia" law too. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the Criminal Code carry laws to handle hate crimes or racism. [Section 318, 319(1) and 319(2) specifically.

Let us never forget that criticizing any social concerns about a belief system or community is the democratic right of every citizen in a civilized country. 

This post about "Islamophobia" can be interpreted as "Islamophobic" because it can be interpreted as insulting to Islam--in spite of the fact that an inanimate thing such as a door or an idea, cannot be insulted.


Tweet