Sanders' new hire wrote that he hoped the Boston Marathon Bomber was white

White man David Sirota is one of the newest additions to the 2020 Bernie Sanders campaign. The white man once wrote that he hoped the Boston Marathon bomber was also a white American, because even though Sirota is white, he is a leftist who adheres to intersectionality and the victimization of everyone below the white man's level of privilege.

Two days after the bombing, which killed three people and injured hundreds of others, Sirota, a card-carrying cretin, argued in an article that Americans should wish the bombers be white because that reality would prevent war and wouldn't harm the advancement of liberal causes like cutting defense spending and passing immigration reform.

So the bombers weren't white and there was no war as a result of the Boston Marathon bombing, proving my claim in the paragraph above.

The article was published in leftist website Salon and was titled, "Let's hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American."

Sirota wrote in the 2013 article that has proven to be nothing more than pretentious bloviating from a virtue-signaling white guy who, like Joe Biden, apologizes for his Caucasian birth:

Because of these undeniable and pervasive double standards, the specific identity of the Boston Marathon bomber (or bombers) is not some minor detail — it will almost certainly dictate what kind of governmental, political and societal response we see in the coming weeks. That means regardless of your particular party affiliation, if you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist. Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues.

If the bomber was white, Sirota said, then white privilege would shield policy debates from any political fallout.

It turns out the bombers were Muslim and seemed to be white, but Sirota definitely didn't want them to be Muslim because undoubtedly war would break out.

The American people are better than that. We are better than Sirota's claims and fears and bloviating.

In the same year, Sirota also praised now dead Venezuelan dictator Hugh Chavez and how he achieved an "economic miracle" in the country by advancing socialism and redistribution of wealth. 

Yes, having to use the Communist Manifesto to wipe your butt is, in a way, a sign of progress, but for Chavez, it was unintentional that his people would have to do such a thing due to lack of toilet paper and other basic necessities, like electricity, that socialism has determined weren't necessary. 

Like Brooklyn Bernie, Sirota is a useful idiot to the cause of socialism. He probably owns a "Che" tee shirt.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Alexandria Obviously-Comatose asleep at the wheel of history

Ad hominem attacks are usually a feeble attempts at winning the debate over another person's ideas, but come on, you have to call them as you see them. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Democratic socialist-NY) apparently has as much knowledge of American history as a blowfish has of baseball. Ad hominem[ly] speaking, she's an idiot.

AOC claimed that Republicans in Congress amended the U.S. Constitution in order to kick President Franklin D. Roosevelt out of office. It wasn't an amendment that did it, unfortunately for FDR, it was the fact that he was two years dead and buried before the 22nd Amendment became law. He died in 1945 and the Amendment was passed in 1947.

"They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure Roosevelt did not get reelected," Obviously-Comatose said Friday during a night hall event with MSNBC with Chris Hayes. 

The best part was to watch her fellow idiots nod in agreement.

This is the same cretin who claimed falsely that "Medicare for All" could be funded by @21 trillion in accounting errors by the Pentagon.

I don't like ad hominem attacks, but AOC really is an incredibly stupid person who needs to learn a lot before she makes wild statements.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.






Tweet

Bob O'Rourke goes all the way left: will break apart wealth, except his

Bob O'Rourke suddenly has a smidgeon of an idea for a policy that has been tried many times over and has failed every time leaving those who fall under its influence poor, miserable and without toilet paper. Socialism.

Maybe O'Rourke is worried about the Indiana newbie in the 2020 presidential race, Peter Buttigieg [pronounced Butter Judge] but whatever the reason, Bob has made some actual statements about his policy platform [not to be confused with the platform he uses to address his audiences which is often a restaurant table] and his move has gone hard left.

Just to be relevant, O'Rourke tweeted on Saturday that he is committed to going full-blown socialist, but calls it 'Democratic socialism.' The main difference between Democratic socialism and socialism is the former hasn't yet bought the guns they'll need to take people's money "for the good of the collective."

A benefit for O'Rourke is his JFKish good looks and the fact his wife is an heiress to billions of dollars. O'Rourke himself is worth $9 million.

A detriment for O'Rourke is that he's kind of a boneheaded schmuck. He says a lot of stupid things like how he wants the people to help mold his policies and how he wants to tear down the border wall in El Paso. And he has bragged about eating dirt and offered a green turd [his infant son's] to his wife telling her it was an avocado. It's unknown if she chowed down on it, but they're still married, so probably not.

Now that Bob realizes how schmuck-like he sounds, he's evidently decided to go radical, and it seems that he's gone further left than Sens. Elizabeth "Dances with Bull" Warren and Kamala "Smokes Dope and Convicts Dopers" Harris. Before Saturday, the idiot hadn't articulated a single national domestic policy.

But now it appears, based on his rhetoric, that Bob could be much closer in his policies to Sen. Bernie Sanders (Commie/I-VT) than any other of the 2020 Democratic contenders.

"The unprecedented concentration of wealth, power and privilege in the United States must be broken apart," O'Rourke tweeted, [obviously unaware of the definition of 'unprecedented']. "Opportunity must be fully shared with all. We must all have the opportunity to succeed. Together. As one country."

"Broken apart?" How, by the end of a gun?

I told you he's a schmuck. But he's smart enough not to go into any detail but that may be due to the idea that he hasn't figured it out yet, or perhaps he just got the idea from reading "Communism for Dummies."

His speeches are high-minded and vague, and his only concrete policy positions are about open borders immigration policy and universal background checks for gun buyers -- the only two issues he's been clear on thus far.

Late last week, Bob O'Rourke took a weak but extreme position on abortion, claiming that he is currently a male, and thus has no right to interfere with a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy, even up until the moment of birth.

Thus, according to this immoral idiot's logic, men who have made laws in our country, must now only make laws for men and vice versa--if you believe this schmuck. This, of course, would also be a rejection of Roe v Wade, since the Supreme Court was comprised of all men at the time.

If Bobby O'Rourke wants to forcibly redistribute wealth, power and privilege, he needs to start with his own. But socialists in power are never the ones affected by their policies.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

The 'collusion delusion' destroys Rachel Maddow's ratings

MSNBC's biggest loser turns out to be Rachel Maddow [aka Madcow] now that the Russia probe has determined that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Special Counsel Robert Mueller officially concluded his investigation into the alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Maddow had seen a rating surge since President Trump took office, offering extensive coverage on the Russia investigation for the past two years with her snarky take on Trump-related gossip she made up off the top of her vacuous head. Her Trump-hating viewers ate that crap up.

However, her viewership has been circling the bowl since Mueller handed his report to the Department of Justice last Friday and the Sunday’s release of Attorney General Bill Barr’s letter summarizing the report that concluded that there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. She even appeared to be crying after the summary came out.

“The Rachel Maddow Show” saw an average 13 percent decrease in viewership comparing her ratings Monday through Wednesday this week versus last week — Maddow lost nearly a whopping 500,000 viewers on Monday’s show following the release of Barr’s letter compared to her previous Monday show. She also saw a 15 percent decrease in the 25-52 demo audience.

This lends hope to the notion that not everyone on the left is too stupid to realize Maddow and the other networks lied to them.

The MSNBC primetime lineup suffered as a whole this week, averaging 2.46 million viewers versus the 2.83 million from last week.

President Trump simply couldn't help himself as he took to Twitter on Thursday morning to mock MSNBC and CNN for their ratings struggle this week.

“Wow, ratings for ‘Morning Joe,’ which were really bad in the first place, just ‘tanked’ with the release of the Mueller report. Likewise, other shows on MSNBC and CNN have gone down by as much as 50%. Just shows, Fake News never wins!” Trump tweeted.

However, Fox News Channel has seen a substantial ratings increase since the findings of the Mueller report summary were made public.

“Hannity” received over 4 million viewers on Monday, which was more than 1 million additional viewers than the previous Monday. Hannity has successfully held onto his momentum, earning 4.3 million viewers on Wednesday night, when he also received a 32 percent increase in the demo from last week.

FNC’s other primetime hosts, Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham, have also benefited since the Mueller report was issued, averaging a 25 percent increase in viewership during primetime this week. They averaged 3.58 million viewers versus last week’s average of 2.72 million viewers.

Maybe the country is finally getting it, after all. Maybe they understand that the media hate Trump more than they love the country and would like to see him, and thus the nation, fail.

Sad!


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.






Tweet

Trump cuts aid to Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador over caravan border assaults

This is why President Trump is in the White House. The United States was sick and tired of the bull puck rhetoric, promises made, promises forgotten. He is cutting aid to Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras, those South American countries that have allowed hordes of their people to head north, overwhelming the Mexican-US border in hopes to get free stuff from the taxpayers.

People who seek actual asylum are supposed to ask for it in the first country at which they arrive. In these cases from South America, that would be Mexico.

On Friday Trump announced, "We were paying them tremendous amounts of money, and we're not paying them anymore. Because they haven't done a thing for us. They set up these caravans."

And they're not sending us their best. They're sending us their Democrats and socialists, but I repeat myself.

"At the Secretary's instruction, we are carrying out the President's direction and ending FY 2017 and FY 2018 foreign assistance programs for the Northern Triangle," a State Department spokesperson said, according to the Comedy News Network. "We will be engaging Congress as part of this process."

Mexico Daily News reported on Wednesday that Olga Sánchez Cordero, the Mexican federal interior secretary, said that the "mother of all caravans" was forming in Honduras and that it contains an estimated 20,000 Democrats.

Even Obama-era DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson said this week that the situation on the southern border is so dire that "we are truly in a crisis." Coming from an Obama puppet like Johnson, that's big news.

"On Tuesday there were 4,000 apprehensions," Johnson said. "I know that 1,000 overwhelms the system and I cannot begin to imagine what 4,000 a day looks like."

Imagine no more, it looks like this:

A separate report from this week found that if the "current rates of Catch and Release, border crossings, and visa overstays pan out," then the U.S. will add nearly 1.5 million illegal alien Democrats to the welfare and other entitlement roles this year.

CNN reported this last week that data they obtained from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) showed that the number of unaccompanied minors arriving at the southern border "is expected to surpass the levels during the 2014 unaccompanied minor crisis." That was the year that then President Obama had kids locked up in cages and it somehow got blamed on Trump.

The crisis has exploded in scope since Democrats forced an exemption into the massive omnibus spending bill that was passed in February that prohibited "DHS from detaining or deporting a sponsor, potential sponsor, or household member of an unaccompanied minor."

Trump, who has been exonerated on the Russian collusion probe, has repeatedly slammed Democrats and Mexico over the last few days for the ongoing crisis on the southern border.

"Mexico must use its very strong immigration laws to stop the many thousands of people trying to get into the USA," Trump tweeted Saturday afternoon. "Our detention areas are maxed out & we will take no more illegals. Next step is to close the Border! This will also help us with stopping the Drug flow from Mexico!"

"It would be so easy to fix our weak and very stupid Democrat inspired immigration laws," Trump added, using simple words. "In less than one hour, and then a vote, the problem would be solved. But the Dems don’t care about the crime, they don’t want any victory for Trump and the Republicans, even if good for USA!" he concluded with an exclamation point, a punctuation mark that should only be used twice every 100,000 words, according to the late Elmore Leonard.

"The DEMOCRATS have given us the weakest immigration laws anywhere in the World. Mexico has the strongest, & they make more than $100 Billion a year on the U.S. Therefore, CONGRESS MUST CHANGE OUR WEAK IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW, & Mexico must stop illegals from entering the U.S through their country and our Southern Border," Trump tweeted on Friday, overlooking the period after the 'S' in the abbreviation: U.S. [Ever wonder why the word 'abbreviation' is so long?]

"Mexico has for many years made a fortune off of the U.S., far greater than Border Costs. If Mexico doesn’t immediately stop ALL illegal immigration coming into the United States through our Southern Border, I will be CLOSING the Border, or large sections of the Border, next week. This would be so easy for Mexico to do, but they just take our money and “talk.” Besides, we lose so much money with them, especially when you add in drug trafficking etc.), that the Border closing would be a good thing!" [Again with the exclamation mark. It's incredible!]

Prior POTUSes before Trump have closed the border.  Both Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan closed the border over drug issues. George W. Bush closed the border after the 9-11 attack and Lyndon Johnson closed it when JFK was assassinated. The world didn't come to an end and nobody died over the closings.

I don't believe Trump is bluffing and neither does Kellyanne Conway, Trump's adviser.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Saudi Arabia on course to set new world record

"Safe, for now"

President Trump can brag all he wants about how he's put more blacks and Hispanic folks back to work, but the real record is being chased by the theocratic monarchy of Saudi Arabia, and Trump can't argue with the facts.

Saudi Arabia on course for a record number of executions including public beheadings in 2019 despite claims kingdom is ‘modernizing.’

The sand castle kingdom has already reportedly 43 people in the first three months of this year – the most recent being a Syrian man who was put to death on March 13 for smuggling amphetamine pills, a capital crime and one obviously not worth losing your head over.

And if this rate continues, 172 Muslim miscreants of sharia law will have been put to death by the end of the year, it was reported.

The record for the number of executions carried out by Saudi Arabia was 158, according to human rights advocates Amnesty International, but it's looking good for record enthusiasts as it looks like this record will fall, much like the heads of those who help set it.

Of those murdered legally by the sharia compliant government this year, 21 were reportedly for drugs offenses.

But other crimes which carry the death penalty include adultery, renouncing the mafia-like religion of Islam, treason, espionage, burglary as well as murder, terrorism, rape or espionage.

Burglary? If that includes being handed too much change after a cash transaction, half my family would be dead.

Beheading remains the most common form of execution and the sentence traditionally carried out in a public square on a Friday after prayers for the entertainment of the public and to show them just how seriously the government takes Islamic law.

Deera Square in the centre of the capital Riyadh is known locally as "Chop Chop Square.”

Figures from anti-death penalty campaigners Reprieve, showed that executions doubled in Saudi Arabia under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

[I have always said that you must be wary of people with a 'bin' before their last name.]

Bin Salman is the country's effective ruler and the driving force behind liberal reforms in nation, including allowing women to drive. But if they get into even a minor fender-bender, they can lose more than just their license, if you know what I mean.

The number of believers put to death between June 2017 – when he came to power – and March 2018 was 133, compared to just 67 in the preceding eight months before he was installed. His motto is: "When I'm in charge, heads will roll."

Nearly 40 percent of those executed last year were convicted of drugs offenses, with 77 percent of them being foreign nationals.

In October the execution of Tuti Tursilawati, an Indonesian maid, without either her family or the Indonesian authorities even being told led to worldwide condemnation.

She was found guilty in June 2011 of killing her Saudi slave master, but claimed she had acted in self-defense after he tried to rape her.

Despite an upward trend in the number of executions since 2000, Saudi Arabia is still in third place behind China and Iran, where between 249 and 285 people were executed in 2018. In 4th and 5th place are Iraq and Pakistan, but bin Salman is hopeful that this year his country will take the trophy for most executions.

"It's just so hard with all those millions of Chinese people doing bad things. But, Inshallah, I will make beheadings great again!" bin Salman said. "We will be number one."

Saudi Arabia’s largest mass execution was in 1980 when 63 rebels were put to death for seizing Mecca’s Grand Mosque. You don't blow your nose in Superman's cape or mess with a mosque in Saudi Arabia.

In 2015 the authorities in Riyadh advertised for eight new executioners because it couldn’t keep up with the rising number of death sentences. Although it's a thankless job, there were plenty of takers.

The ad asked for no specific skills but said the job included “executing a judgment of death.” In other words, doing Allah's work.

Over the years there have been reports of the bizarre and barbaric punishments handed down in Saudi Arabia. The country has no written penal code and no code of criminal procedure and judicial procedure. They kind of "wing it" and use sharia law which has been barbaric since 652.

The list of punishments makes for grim reading and there have been reports of people being sentenced to crucifixion, amputation, eye-gouging, paralysis, stoning and a flogging. Currently, the Saudis are considering using: a hundred kicks in the balls, soldering closed the urinary meatus, pouring boiling pablum on the pudenda of female offenders, and giving excruciating Indian burns to offenders before beheading them.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

Kim Foxx is okay with outside investigation into Smollett case

Cook County State's Attorney [while she still has her law license] Kim Foxx [no relation to Redd Foxx but she is friends with the Obamas] said that she is open to an independent outside investigation into her office's horrible decision to dismiss all charges against "alleged" racial hoaxer and staunch anti-Trumper, Jussie Smollett. [The word 'alleged' is used to protect us from lawsuits but the evidence that shows Smollett is guilty is highly overwhelming.]

In an op-ed for The Chicago Tribune, Foxx admitted that a third-party review into the high-profile case would help maintain transparency, something she pretends to welcome with open adipose arms.

The surprise decision to drop all 16 charges on Tuesday, followed by Smollett's refusals to apologize along with claims of his innocence and complete exoneration, was followed by an immediate rebuke from Chicago's mayor Rahm Emanuel and police superintendent Eddie T. Johnson. Both men said that it was a "whitewash of justice" which subsequently put pressure on the state's attorney's office to defend its whitewash actions.

“I am not perfect, nor is any other prosecutor out there, but ensuring that I and my office have our community’s trust is paramount,” Foxx, who ran on a platform of transparency, wrote.

Foxx also initially said she recused herself from the Smollett case and later stated that she didn't mean "recuse-recuse," she was merely being colloquial and only meant 'recuse'. The question is, how can anyone use the legal term 'recuse' in a colloquial way?

Smollett is accused of staging an anti-gay, racist attack on himself in January in order to promote his career. He has denied the charges from the start and says two men approached him at 2 a.m. during a polar vortex, beat him, threw bleach they apparently had on him and tied a rope around his neck before shouting, "This is MAGA country," in reference to President Trump's campaign slogan, "Make America Great Again."

Yes. We are to believe that while most people were at home in their warm beds, two white Trump supporters IN CHICAGO knew who Smollett is because they watch "Empire" like all good Trump supporters, had bleach and a rope with them, and attacked him.

We are also to believe that in during the entire "attack," Smollett held onto his Subway sandwich, left the rope around his neck and waited 40 minutes to call the cops. And we are expected to believe that after he told the cops that he spoke with his boss when the attack occurred, but refused to give up his phone to them so they could check, that he was telling the truth.

And we are expected to believe that the two Nigerian men who he knew, who bought red hats [not MAGA hats--they're impossible to buy in Chicago], rope and bleach, prior to the attack, and that Smollett had written them a check for three thousand dollars, [not a Mensa move], and who subsequently told law enforcement that Smollett hired him to attack him, that he is innocent?

In order to investigate the alleged hate crime, the city removed 24 detectives from their regular cases, expending up to 1,000 hours to hunt down the truth.

“In determining whether or not to pursue charges, prosecutors are required to balance the severity of the crime against the likelihood of securing a conviction,” Foxx wrote. “For a variety of reasons ... my office believed the likelihood of securing a conviction was not certain.”

Yeah, and OJ is still looking for the killer of his wife.

According to sources, including my own source, Vinny Bagadonuts, the grand jury was willing to indict Smollett with a sliver of evidence the Chicago PD provided to them.

Foxx said Smollett’s “alleged unstable actions have probably caused him more harm than any court-ordered penance could.”  Boo hoo. But she added that jails should be reserved for those who commit violent crimes, which is not her call to make, and it's blatantly false.

Her defense isn't swaying many people.

"Foxx could have distanced herself from this blunder given that her own blunder — emailing and texting with people close to Smollett early in the investigation — had prompted her to step away from the case and leave it to underlings," Chicago Tribune columnist Eric Zorn wrote. "But she grabbed ownership of it Wednesday, giving interviews in which she expressed pride and confidence in the way her office had handled the case."

Zorn, like so many others in Chicago, believe Foxx "probably will and arguably should lose her job next year over her office's handling of the Jussie Smollett case." Some believe she should lose her license to practice law.

Foxx's actions also prompted both the National District Attorneys Association and the Illinois Prosecutors bar Association to sharply criticize her office.

President Trump obviously waded into the controversy because he cannot help himself, saying he would asked federal law enforcement officials to look into Smollett's case right after he asks them to check out whether Adam Schiff was the guy caught on camera jay walking on J Street.

“I think the case in Chicago is an absolute embarrassment to our country, and I have asked that they look at it,” Trump said.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Israel's IAF hits Iranian targets in Syria

Israel's IAF slammed Iranian targets in Syria in a massive strike Wednesday night, according to Arab media. Seven Iranians got their alleged assigned virgins. according to reports.

Syria’s state SANA reported that Syrian air defense “confronted an Israeli air aggression” and “downed a number of the hostile missiles” which targeted “some sites in the industrial region” in the northeastern Aleppo region.

The Syrian news agency said 70 percent of the missiles allegedly launched by Israel were intercepted but could not answer the question as to how an alleged missile could be intercepted.

That report claimed that the damage caused by the attack was “restricted to materials only,” and the seven dead guys were considered human material and not very good jihadists in the first place so it was no great loss.

However, the London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), wit its assets inside Syria, reported that explosions “rocked” the crap out of the area of Aleppo International Airport as the IAF targeted “ammunition warehouses affiliated to the Iranian forces.”

SOHR reported at least seven people were killed in the strike belonging to Iranian forces.

Although Israel has not officially commented on the attack, Minister of Intelligence and Acting Foreign Minister Yisrael Katz said, “According to what the Iranians know, it is Israel who attacked.”

Iran’s military build-up in Syria remains a red line for the tiny Jewish state of Israel. The IAF has carried out thousands of attacks to thwart the Iranian entrenchment in the war-torn country.

Iran uses its positions in Syria to transfer weapons and infrastructure to its terror proxy in Lebanon, Hezbollah, while attempting to establish another military front against Israel from the Syrian Golan Heights.

The Iranians along with their Sunni enemies in the Middle East, all hate the one group who have no right to exist, as they see it: the Jews [aka "The Jooooze!"].

Fortunately for Israel, we now have in Trump, the most Israel-friendly president ever, in the United States and the anti-Semites in the Middle East know that fact. Sadly, however, we now also have the most anti-Semitic Democratic Party in our history.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.



Tweet

Harry Reid sues TheraBand saying it made him fall and screw him up even more than he already is

The following is mostly true, but look out for the obvious satire.

Admitted liar and former Democratic Senator [but I repeat myself] Harry Reid of Nevada is suing the makers of TheraBand, a physical therapy stretchy resistance band that he claims has caused him to lose sight in his right eye after he fell butt over teakettle in the bathroom of his expensive home.

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that the admittedly dishonest former politician is suing Ohio-based Hygenic Intangible Property Holding Co., The Hygenic Corp. and Performance Health LLC, for $50,000 claiming that their faulty product caused him to suffer "a concussion, broken orbital bones, severe disfigurement to his face, bruising and lacerations on his face, hand injuries, scarring and broken ribs."

Reid falsely claimed that he was doing physical therapy exercises with the TheraBand in his bathroom with Nancy Pelosi on New Years Day 2015. The band slipped from his slimy grasp, he fell and sustained major injuries. Two months later, because he was still contending with blindness in his right eye, he says he was forced to retire from his job in the Senate (at age 75). Truth be told, he would have retired anyway.

Reid, now 79 and suffering from pancreatic cancer, has appeared in court but it's not clear whether he will testify, but so far, only a few days into the trial, things don't seem to be going Reid's way.

According to the Associated Press, the lawyer for Hygenic 'told a civil trial jury that congressional exercise advisers tried for months to teach Reid to improve his foot stance, balance and technique while using the resistance bands at his doctors’ recommendation," and that Reid was using the band "improperly," when he tied it to his shower door and his maid's waist.

Reid claimed, at the time, that the band broke, which is what caused him to fall forward on "Dancing Hands" Pelosi, roll off her and smash his face on a hard surface. However his lawyers, in their opening statement, agreed with the defendant that Reid was holding the band in his hand when he lost his grip and lied once again, as is his wont.

“The evidence will show that he was using a band … it slipped from the hand, he spun to the right … and landed right on the eye,” his attorney said, adding that Reid's bathroom was almost entirely clad in marble and granite -- two very unforgiving surfaces--and the floor was greased at Ms. Pelosi's request.

Worse still, it seems Reid threw the band out after the incident, meaning that no one involved in the lawsuit has the exact item Reid was using, and it's not immediately clear that the product was and actual TheraBand manufactured or sold by Hygenic.

People close to Reid agree that he has a spotty relationship with the truth, and a quiet one with Pelosi.

Harry Reid has thankfully been mostly absent from politics since leaving Congress in 2015. His soft wispy voice will not be missed by most people who see him for who he is.

Just a few days ago, Reid [aka Hairy Weed] took credit for kicking off concerns about Russian election interference, claiming that he wrote a letter to the FBI in August 2016, trying to force then-FBI director James Comey to take note of Russian interference in American elections.

He also took credit for the "nuclear option" that has come back to haunt the Democrats as Trump has appointed numerous conservative judges to the courts and two Supreme Court justices, one of whom is a true conservative and the other, Brett Kavanaugh.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

NY mobster at 102 compares himself to Jesus

Colombo under-boss John "Badahbahbadahbing" Franzese [aka "Sonny] was the oldest fart in federal prison at the very ripe age of 100. He bragged in an interview in which he only needed a "quick break" fourteen times that he refused to rat out his co-workers in crime.

"Only freakin' rats squeal," he said as he sat in his wheelchair in a nursing home where he reached out and tried to grab a nurse's aide by the bottom as he spoke to Newsday about his life of crime.

He bragged how he stuck to the “Goodfellas” adage of “Never rat on your friends, and always keep your mouth shut” despite facing 50 years behind bars.

“They wanted me to roll all the time,” Franzese insisted. “I couldn’t do that. Because it’s my principle. I could never give a guy up because I knew what jail was. I wouldn’t put a dog in a jail pod.”

What a great criminal.

Speaking for the first time since his release in June 2017, Franzese bragged to the paper that “no one in history” had done as much, likening it to godliness.

“Jesus suffered,” he said. “He didn’t squeal on nobody,” which is a double-negative.

He plans to turn his life around now and speak to kids about how to live a life without getting caught. "But if you do . . . keep your f***ing mouth shut."


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

Convicted pedophile passes out after hearing his sentence

A convicted pedophile, whose surname is an oxymoron, had an episode of the vapors when he heard his sentence.

Thomas Goodman, 45, a Rhode Island scumbag, reportedly passed out in court on Friday upon learning that he’d been sentenced to 260 years behind bars, The Providence Journal reported.

Goodman was reportedly ordered to consecutively fulfill his prison sentence. The scum muffin was convicted on eight counts of sexually exploiting children – getting 30 years on each [do the math] – and one count of possessing sadistic and masochistic child pornography, for which he got an additional 20 years, the outlet said.

Goodman was accused of sexually abusing two 6-year-old girls, as well as a 3-week-old baby, according to The Journal. He should have received the death penalty but the judge felt that it would be more interesting to see whether his inmate associates agree with him on that count.

U.S. District Court Judge John J. McConnell, who handed down the sentence, reportedly said it was his duty to shield the community from Goodman, who obviously isn't a good man.

“The only way I can do that is to be sure you never get out of prison again,” McConnell said. “I have no assurances you will stop.”

After he regained consciousness, Goodman was led out of the courthouse and immediately began serving his sentence. He his hoping to get out in 130 years for good behavior.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

ESPN slaps Keith Olbermann lightly on the wrist after calling on his twits to ruin someone's life

Hands up, don't think

Was his Twitter account hacked, as it always seems to happen to liberals who get caught saying dumb s**t? Probably not, as is nearly always the case.

Former relevant person Keith "Worst Person in the World" Olbermann, an anti-Trump #Resistance dolt, got an earful from ESPN after demanding Brian Broom, a Mississippi Clarion-Ledger journalist be fired and encouraged his Twitter dweebs to harass a 22-year-old turkey hunter who bagged a turkey in season and who Broom wrote about for his outlet.

Olbermann posted Broom’s Clarion Ledger article chronicling Hunter Waltman’s kill of a rare white turkey to Twitter on Tuesday. And in typical unhinged fashion, the former MSNBC personality urged social media users to make Waltman’s life “a living hell.” He stopped short of asking for a revenge murder of the young man.

“It be rare and beautiful so me should kill it,” mocked the 60-year-old. “This pea-brained scumbag identifies himself as Hunter Waltman and we should do our best to make sure the rest of his life is a living hell,” the B-B-brained Olbermann tweeted.

The virtue signaling moron added, “And the nitwit clown who wrote this fawning piece should be fired.”

According to Fox News, ESPN “confirmed that it has ‘spoken to’” Olberman over his controversial comments concerning the young hunter and Broom.

"We have spoken [gently] to him about not making personal attacks," an ESPN spokesperson said in a statement.

As Broom noted in his feature on Waltman, the hunter received mild criticism online, mostly because some argued that the turkey he killed was not wild, but domestic livestock. The hunter maintained that the rare bird was “100 percent wild,” and certified wildlife biologist Bob Eriksen agreed.

"The naked head and neck do not appear to be as ornate as one would expect in a domestic turkey gobbler," Eriksen, a Natural Resources Conservation Service technical service provider, informed Broom. "Even in a first-generation cross between an eastern wild turkey and a domestic bird there would be evidence of domestic traits such as a very large, ornate head and neck and an excessively large dewlap. In addition a F1 would exhibit short lower legs that would be heavier than those of a wild eastern.”

But we should take it from the leftist science deniers, the bird was being raised by domesticated wolves.

The Clarion-Ledger’s Executive Editor Sam R. Hall took a swing at Olbermann for his ignorance of hunting culture, his outrageous call for Broom to be fired for doing his job, and for his disrespect for the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.

“Keith Olbermann says Brian Broom should be fired for writing this story. What was I thinking? I guess I should have fired our outdoors writer for writing about a hunter killing an unusual turkey during turkey hunting season,” teased Hall.

The executive editor added that Olbermann's comments were “recklessly irresponsible.” He left out stupid, rude, disgusting, anti-American and sanctimonious.

"Someone with his following needs to understand the possible impact of his words," Hall noted. ”Telling over 1 million people to make someone’s life a living hell could have seriously dangerous consequences. In our newsroom, that would be a fireable offense, not writing a story about a hunter bagging a turkey.”

In November of 2017, Olbermann, one of the loudest voices in the #Resistance movement, announced the end of his YouTube show “The Resistance" for GQ magazine. During his goodbye, Olbermann assured the public that President Donald Trump’s presidency would soon come to an end, but he was wrong and he remains a irrelevant to reasonable people.

By attacking both the First- and Second Amendments, Keith Olbermann proved that he is the "Worst Person In The World."


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Green New Deal 'wet noodles' in the Senate

Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Comatose's [AOC] (freshman Socialist-NY) Green New Deal (GND) was brought up to a vote on the Senate floor by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (D-KY). This upset the socialist author of the deal because she discovered that people took it seriously by reading it and decided to call her out on her stupidity.

The deal is an ultra radical and quite "hilarious" proposal for dealing with climate change by eliminating cows because they fart a lot, and knocking down all the buildings in America and refitting them for zero carbon emissions. It also calls for the elimination of all gas-driven vehicles and airplanes and this is to be substituted with choo-choo trains that can magically travel on water or on an invisible bridge that spans the newly cleaned up planet.

The Senate failed to reach the 60 votes needed to start a debate on the non-binding, silly as a cow fart resolution. In fact, no Democrat voted for it in spite of them touting it as the best thing since Silly Putty on white bread. In fact, 42 Democrats voted "present" because they didn't have the guts to vote for the thing they supported in public.

No senator voted to begin debate on the legislation, while 57 lawmakers voted against breaking the filibuster. Democratic Sens. Doug Jones of Alabama, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten "Allahu Akbar" Sinema, [a Taliban supporter] from Arizona joined 53 Republicans in voting "no." Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, who caucuses with the Democrats, also noted "no."

McConnell put the vote forward so that Democratic senators would have to go on the record about the bat crap crazy measure. He referred to the proposal as "a radical, top-down, socialist makeover of the entire U.S. economy." At a news conference earlier Tuesday, McConnell said he believed that climate change was real and at least partially caused by humans, but said the real question facing lawmakers was, "How do you address it?"

Special Class let out early

[Democratic answer: By destroying the economy, killing all the cows, grounding all the planes, stopping all the cows, knocking down all the buildings, and making AOC the "boss."]

"The way to do this, consistent with American values and American capitalism is through technology and innovation," McConnell said. " ... Not to shut down your economy, throw people out of work, make people reconstruct their homes, get out of their cars, you get the whole drift here. This is nonsense, and if you’re going to sign on to nonsense, you ought to have to vote for nonsense."

Touché, mon ami.

Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck "Nostrils Like Tunnels" Schumer, called McConnell's move a "sham vote" that aimed to draw attention away from real debate on the consequences of climate change.

No Chucky--it's a sham proposal that you idiots said you supported. All Mitch did was hold your feet to the fire.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Rep. Omar holds secret fundraisers with terror-tied Islamist groups

Freshman Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is not merely an anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist hater, she has been holding a series of secret fundraisers with terror-tied groups that are closed to the press and hidden from public view.

The content of her speeches, given to predominately Muslim audiences and sundry anti-Semites, remains unknown, but you can bet that if the public isn't being allowed to hear it, she's going full-throat Jew hater with her rhetoric.

Omar recently spoke in Florida at a private event hosted by Islamic Relief, a "charity organization" with deep ties to groups that advocate terrorism against Israeli Jews.

Over the weekend, she will appear at another private event in California that is hosted by CAIR-CA PAC, a political action committee affiliated with the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), a group named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial for funding terrorism.

Omar's appearance at these closed-door forums is raising eyebrows in the pro-Israel world due to her repeated and unapologetic public use of anti-Semitic tropes accusing Jewish people of controlling foreign policy and politics. With Omar's popularity skyrocketing on the pro-Hitler left, it appears her rhetoric is translating into fundraising prowess.

The Washington Free Beacon reports:

Islamic Relief has come under congressional investigation for what lawmakers have described as its efforts to provide assistance to terrorist group such as Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. The charity has been banned by some countries as a result of these ties. 

In 2017, Congress sought to ban taxpayer funds from reaching the charity due to these terror links.

On Sunday, Omar will hold another meet and greet in Irvine, Calif., for CAIR-CA PAC. Those wishing to hear Omar spew her bile are being asked to donate anywhere from $50 to $250 dollars, according to a flyer for the event. No Jews need apply. All proceeds will likely go to Hamas.

The CAIR event also appears closed to the press.

CAIR, a Muslim advocacy group with abhorrent anti-Israel positions, was named by the U.S. government as part of a large network of groups known to be supporting Hamas.

CAIR has been cited by the Anti-Defamation League, or ADL, for using its network of supporters to promote an "anti-Israel agenda." Omar is hoping to become their poster girl.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.



Tweet

BREAKING: Avenatti's co-conspirator in alleged fraud scheme is Jussie Smollett's 'gang bang' lawyer, CNN analyst

According to the Wall Street Journal, the alleged co-conspirator in the alleged Michael Avenatti fraud scheme is the Comedy News Network's 9CNN) analyst Mark Geragos. He also is the attorney for the alleged hoaxer, Jussie "I'll Remove the Noose Now" Smollett.

The Journal reported. "According to the complaint filed in New York, Mr. Avenatti and Mr. Geragos, the alleged co-conspirator, met with lawyers for Nike in New York on March 19 and threatened to release damaging information unless the company agreed to pay the two lawyers millions of dollars and another $1.5 million to the client Avenatti claimed to represent."

It makes sense because Avenatti doesn't appear to be smart enough to try pulling off a bank and wire fraud without help.

On CNN's website, Geragos is listed as "a legal analyst for CNN."

Geragos recently appeared on CNN and defended Smollett after the gay actor was charged with 16 felony counts. At the time, he claimed that Smollett was the victim of a "media gang bang" whatever that is.

"They're bringing 16 counts. They're bringing 16 counts because they parsed out two statements," Geragos said. "I defy you to find something like that. He was not suspended. They have not talked to one person at Fox who has said he was dissatisfied with his money. They have not interviewed one person connected with the show 'Empire' who says he was dissatisfied with his money."

"What is happening here is frankly a media gang bang of this guy of unprecedented proportions and that's the reason I got into this," Geragos continued, apparently upset about gang bangs. "I've never seen a media pendulum swing more quickly and more viciously and rob somebody of their presumption of innocence like this case. It's startling the way people assume that he's guilty."

Geragos has also represented former NFL quarterback Colin "I Squat Against America" Kaepernick, Michael "I Love Children" Jackson, and Chris "Shuttup Beyatch" Brown. He was hoping to represent a porn performer but Avenatti got there first.

Avenatti, who was arrested on Monday, faces federal charges in both New York and in California for an alleged bank and wire fraud.

"A lawyer has a basic duty not to steal from his client," United States Attorney Nick Hanna said. "Mr. Avenatti is facing serious criminal charges alleging he misappropriated client trust funds for his personal use and he defrauded a bank by submitting phony tax returns in order to obtain millions of dollars in loans."

"Professionals, including attorneys, who create elaborate schemes that have no purpose other than to mislead others and defraud both their clients and federally insured financial institutions, run the very high risk of prosecution," said Special Agent in Charge Ryan Korner of IRS-Criminal Investigation. "The criminal complaint unsealed today shows a pattern of selfish behavior that paints Mr. Avenatti as a lawyer who only represents his own self-interests."

If convicted, Avenatti faces up to 50 years in federal prison, according to the Department of Justice, which would make him 98-years-old when he's sprung.

President Trump has not yet tweeted about this latest development, but the country awaits with high anticipation. It should be a doozy.

This is a breaking story--more to follow.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

VIDEO: Trump campaign launches attack after release of Mueller report

The Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday that advisors to President Trump are going to use the findings of the Mueller report to attack the Democrats for the way they attacked the president over the Mueller probe over alleged collusion with the Russians in the 2016 presidential campaign.

When asked whether Trump's team plans to go after the Dems, The Journal quoted Bryan Lanza, a deputy communications director for Trump’s 2016 campaign, responding, “You better believe we’re going to bludgeon them.”

The Trump campaign released a video to supporters on Sunday titled, “Collusion Hoax.”  In the video, several Democrats such as Rep. Adam "I Stepped In" Schiff (D-CA),  Sen. Richard "Stolen Valor" Blumenthal (D-CT), Rep. Eric "King of Comedy" Swalwell (D-CA), Rep. Jerrold "My Left Eyebrow Dances" Nadler (D-NY), and DNC Chairman Tom "I Say Dirty Words" Perez, accuse Trump of collusion with Putin, and what sounds like a game show buzzer goes off with the word "WRONG" on the screen.

At the end of the video the screen advises viewers to text "WITCHHUNT" to a number designed to sign them up to alerts.

Schiff has basically camped out in the CNN parking lot and every chance he got, he ran into the studio to show his cartoon character face and colluded with the network to speak of the alleged Trump involvement with Russia.

In April 2017, after CNN’s Jake Tapper asked Schiff, "Can you say definitively that there was collusion, there were people affiliated with the Trump campaign who were working with Russians to time the release of damaging information about Hillary Clinton that had been hacked – either from John Podesta or the DNC?" Schiff responded, “I don't think we can say anything definitively at this point. We are still at the very early stage of the investigation. The only thing I can say is that it would be irresponsible for us not to get to the bottom of this.”

Being a bottom-feeder, Schiff stayed on the bottom and by August of 2018, he bloviated, “I think there’s plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight.” The video shows Schiff making that statement, followed by “Wrong” and the buzzer.

Enjoy the video.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Pete Buttigieg lacks logic on abortion issue

Democratic 2020 hopeful Pete Buttigieg [pronounced "Butter Judge"] has made the cowardly and illogical statement that if you lack a uterus, you ought not to have an opinion on abortion. In his thinking and taking it to the next logical conclusion, if a mother wants to kill a man's son on his thirteenth birthday, it isn't up to the father to go against it because he didn't give birth to the child.

And here, all along, I thought Butter Judge was an intelligent guy. All he seems to be is a cowardly Democrat, but I repeat myself.

The South Bend, Indiana mayor spoke in Greenville, South Carolina, mentioning freedom in the context of killing babies under the clinical term known as abortion.

"You’re not free if your reproductive choices are being dictated by male politicians in Washington," he stated, substituting the term 'reproductive choices' for the murdering of a human life.

The young politician's remark comes with the territory of being a progressive. His immoral position on abortion is totally in line with the other Democrats running for the 2020 nomination.

Although Butter Judge hasn’t spoken in detail about his beliefs surrounding abortion, during a mid-February appearance on MSNBC’s "Morning Joe" with host Joe Scarborough, the mayor replied to a question about abortion law with a remark that mirrored his South Carolina speech:

SCARBOROUGH: Do you support the late-term abortion legislation that was passed in the New York state legislature, as well as in Virginia?

BUTTIGIEG: I don’t think we need more restrictions right now. And, you know, what I’ve learned in Indiana, being in a place where a lot of my friends, a lot of my supporters even, come from a different place than I do, being pro-choice, I just believe that when a woman is in that situation, and when we’re talking about some of those situations covered by that law – extremely difficult, painful, often medically serious situations where life or health of the mother is at stake – the involvement of a male government official like me is not helpful.

[It's referred to as 'restrictions' when leftists want to condemn something, and 'a woman's right to choose' when they want to avoid anyone else having the right to choose for a baby that cannot defend its life.]

This is a garbage argument frequently made by pro-choice politicians and activists. In short – no uterus, no opinion. Unfortunately for Buttigieg, and other idiots who continue to use this argument, "no uterus, no opinion" is logically flawed, and it opens up a massive can of worms as it pertains to other laws.

A law cannot be experiential, written only by those who have or can experience the situations which the law is made to address. In addition, there are myriad laws written by men that deal primarily with women, like laws pertaining to rape and its punishment.

The idea of experiential law undermines all law. If one has not committed murder, been close to a victim of murder, or been involved in a murder case, how can one be suited to draft a law criminalizing murder? No murder experience, no opinion. 

If you don't have the capacity to become pregnant or have an abortion, you should not be allowed to create legislation dealing with abortion [unless you're talking about Roe v. Wade which expands abortion and was decided by nine Supreme Court justices, all of whom were men].

You don't have to have cancer in order to cure it and you don't have to have a uterus to have a sense of what is moral and correct in terms of the baby growing inside. But to make matters worse, Democrats are increasingly accepting the idea that a woman can decide to terminate her pregnancy after the baby is born. Of course, that isn't terminating the pregnancy, the pregnancy is complete. That is terminating an infant, plain and simple.

To suggest that men shouldn't have a say in abortion is ridiculous and stupid, but the ridiculously stupid progressives use that argument because it sounds compassionate while it's merely immoral.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

MUELLER REPORT SUMMARY RELEASED: Trump is doing his happy dance

Attorney General William Barr has finally released the "principal conclusions" of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's completed Russia probe in a four-page letter to Capitol Hill lawmakers.

The letter stated definitively that Mueller did not establish evidence that Trump's team had conspired with Russia nor coordinated with Russia.

"The special counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its effort" to interfere with the 2016 presidential election, according to Mueller's report.

Barr said Mueller's team had "thoroughly" investigated allegations that Trump's team sought to conspire with Russians or obstruct investigators. The probe employed about 40 FBI agents, executing hundreds of search warrants, 19 lawyers, mostly Democrats, and the probe interviewed about 500 witnesses.

Barr's disclosure was a climax following the 22-month investigation that ensnared six former Trump advisers and associates -- but resulted in no indictments related to collusion with Russia.

The Democrats, some of whom beat their dogs, punched their boyfriends or partook in bouts of trichotillomania, vowed that this will not be the end of it. Just because they praised Mueller and his unwavering commitment to the truth when the probe into Russian collusion with the Trump campaign began, is no reason to continue believing in things they said in the past.

On Sunday Democrats vowed to press on with other investigations, and members of both parties continued to push for the public release of as much of the Mueller report as possible, unlike the left's refusal to demand transparency in the Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama scandals.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that he believed there remained “significant evidence of collusion” linking the Russian government with President Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, and if any is found, he will personally call for the president's execution.

Schiff said Democrats might subpoena Mueller, Barr and Putin if the full report is not released.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY), speaking to "Fox News Sunday," insisted, "So we know a lot of things and maybe it’s not indictable, but we know there was collusion. The question is the degree." [Never trust politicians and liberals, in general, who begin their sentences with 'so.']

Democrat congressional leaders scrambled to respond to the end of the Mueller probe this weekend, holding an emergency conference call and discussing potential next steps with Roseanne Barr [no relation to Bill] and Chelsea Handler.



"It's the end of the beginning but it's not the beginning of the end," Delaware Sen. Chris Coons (D) said, echoing his party's strategy of moving forward on to other investigations, including probes into Trump's financial dealings, his sex life, his children and their financial dealings and sex lives, and whether he ever held hands with Vladimir Putin.

 "Once we get the principal conclusions of the report," Coons added later, "I think it's entirely possible that that will be a good day for the president and his core supporters."

Along those lines, Nadler said that Democrats would continue their efforts to find out anything they can that can affect the outcome of the 2020 election at the expense of taxpayer money. In other words, we have a president and a party trying to find a crime rather than a crime and trying to find the perpetrator.

"The job of Congress is much broader than the job of the special counsel," Nadler said. "The special counsel is looking and can only look for crimes. We have to protect the rule of law, we have to look for abuses of power, we have to look for obstructions of justice, we have to look for corruption in the exercise of power which may not be crimes."

If you have to look for it, the crime is probably not there, but the election is and that's the real point, isn't it?

A former senior law enforcement official told Fox News that Democrats would lack key investigative powers that Mueller had, including the ability to convene grand juries -- and that Nadler's path amounted to trying to criminalize meetings with foreign actors that the special counsel apparently determined were simply not criminal.

“With all the talk of the Democrats intensifying their House investigations," the former official said, it was important to note that "unlike Special Counsel Mueller, Congress and the [DOJ Inspector General] cannot convene grand juries and initiate prosecutions. If Mueller couldn't find collusion or conspiracy with every investigative tool, what do the Democrats expect to accomplish?"

Other than trying to undermine the election.

Some conservatives, meanwhile, say that Democrats should come under increased scrutiny for their contacts with foreign nationals.

Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) hired the firm Fusion GPS, which employed British ex-spy Christopher Steele to produce an anti-Trump dossier that the FBI used to justify the surveillance of a top Trump aide and kickstart the Russia probe.

 This week, text messages exclusively obtained by Fox News revealed that the DOJ apparently raised "repeated" concerns that Steele, whose blatant anti-Trump views are now widely known, was politically biased.

The Trump aide, Carter Page, has not been charged with any wrongdoing, although the FBI initially alleged he had conspired with Russians.

On Sunday, Ohio GOP Rep. Jim Jordan said Sunday that if the Mueller report is disclosed publicly, then all documents relating to it should also be published -- including the complete Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant application to monitor Page.

That ought to make Hillary a bit nervous.

To his credit, President Trump stayed off of Twitter over the weekend until today when he tweeted: "Have a great day," and "Make America Great Again!"

This angered the liberal press who was hoping he'd say something regrettable.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet