Alexandria Obviously-Comatose asleep at the wheel of history

Ad hominem attacks are usually a feeble attempts at winning the debate over another person's ideas, but come on, you have to call them as you see them. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Democratic socialist-NY) apparently has as much knowledge of American history as a blowfish has of baseball. Ad hominem[ly] speaking, she's an idiot.

AOC claimed that Republicans in Congress amended the U.S. Constitution in order to kick President Franklin D. Roosevelt out of office. It wasn't an amendment that did it, unfortunately for FDR, it was the fact that he was two years dead and buried before the 22nd Amendment became law. He died in 1945 and the Amendment was passed in 1947.

"They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure Roosevelt did not get reelected," Obviously-Comatose said Friday during a night hall event with MSNBC with Chris Hayes. 

The best part was to watch her fellow idiots nod in agreement.

This is the same cretin who claimed falsely that "Medicare for All" could be funded by @21 trillion in accounting errors by the Pentagon.

I don't like ad hominem attacks, but AOC really is an incredibly stupid person who needs to learn a lot before she makes wild statements.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.






Tweet

Cool Hand Barry O

When I was a kid, "cool" described a person who could get things done based on his or her ability and finesse. The cool person was the one who was looked up to by his group. The effort at being cool was invisible, which was what made it cool in the first place. A cool person had more confidence than Putin has with Ukraine.

Today, however, "cool" is defined by how you dress, who you know, what music you listen to, and how you speak. It has nothing to do with your ability. Sometimes it even has more to do with the ability of the people you hang out with, like Jay Z, for example, than it does with your own accomplishments.

When we go shopping, we tend to buy from a salesperson we like. Unfortunately, the same can be said about when we go president-electing: we vote for the person we think is likeable or cool; at least liberals do. It has little to do with the person's beliefs, but the way they feel about the guy. Liberals tend to act as if feelings are facts, and when they're not attacking you personally when you try to debate with them, their arguments are based on feelings. It's when you give them facts that they go all ad hominem on you and get all vulgar and red-faced.

Obama comes off as cool. He has a winning, confident smile, hangs out with cool celebrities, and has become a TV personality, which is even more impressive, in his mind, than being an effective president. And let's admit it; he's likeable when he appears on Ellen Degeneres or The View, and his hosts love him--literally. They ask him tough, focused questions and he courageously answers them candidly, then flashes that signature smile. "Yes, Ellen, I do encourage Sasha to bathe every night before bedtime."

President Obama is very cool when he's with admirers, who consist of low-information liberals, high liberals, high low-information liberals, illegal aliens, wind and solar power-producing companies that fail even with tax-payer bailouts, and The View.

The "new cool" sees power as weakness, like the way Obama defined Putin's Crimea grab. Weakness is seen as power, like the restraint Obama showed with Russia's invasion of Crimea. This is how cool liberals operate. It's all about the words, not the facts. Think "workplace violence" with a hearty 'Allahu Akbar' thrown in--that's an example of bending the truth to suit your needs.

Obama needs the American public to see him as cool. We can forgive him for his lack of accomplishments as president. We can forgive his disregard for law and our Constitution. We can forgive him for his clearly-stated lie about Obamacare--c'mon, you know he didn't really mean you could keep your doctor, period--he was only playin' with you. 

If we didn't see him as cool, we would see him as impeached.

In my latest novel, Jihad Joe, a New York reporter is taken hostage by terrorists. If POTUS refuses to release 3 Gitmo jihadists, the reporter will die in 24 hours—they will behead him and show it on the Internet. There is only one way out but the clock is ticking . . .

Jihad Joe: a Novel  Create Space (Amazon) soft cover book edition

Jihad Joe see it here ebook version 

Tweet

The Fallacies of an Incompetent Community Organizer

What if our current plan of involvement with Syria is just Obama's elaborate use of distraction away from other world atrocities, like those of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt who are responsible for destroying over a dozen Coptic churches? What if the White House lied about who was responsible for chemical weapons use in Syria? Kenneth Timmerman, in the Daily Caller, makes a case about the second question in his article entitled: Verify chemical weapons use before sending the dogs of war. He shows how the Obama administration selectively used intelligence information to justify military strikes in Syria that makes what George W. Bush did in 2003 with the start up of the Iraq war look like a Boy Scout assignment.