Sanders' new hire wrote that he hoped the Boston Marathon Bomber was white

White man David Sirota is one of the newest additions to the 2020 Bernie Sanders campaign. The white man once wrote that he hoped the Boston Marathon bomber was also a white American, because even though Sirota is white, he is a leftist who adheres to intersectionality and the victimization of everyone below the white man's level of privilege.

Two days after the bombing, which killed three people and injured hundreds of others, Sirota, a card-carrying cretin, argued in an article that Americans should wish the bombers be white because that reality would prevent war and wouldn't harm the advancement of liberal causes like cutting defense spending and passing immigration reform.

So the bombers weren't white and there was no war as a result of the Boston Marathon bombing, proving my claim in the paragraph above.

The article was published in leftist website Salon and was titled, "Let's hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American."

Sirota wrote in the 2013 article that has proven to be nothing more than pretentious bloviating from a virtue-signaling white guy who, like Joe Biden, apologizes for his Caucasian birth:

Because of these undeniable and pervasive double standards, the specific identity of the Boston Marathon bomber (or bombers) is not some minor detail — it will almost certainly dictate what kind of governmental, political and societal response we see in the coming weeks. That means regardless of your particular party affiliation, if you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist. Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues.

If the bomber was white, Sirota said, then white privilege would shield policy debates from any political fallout.

It turns out the bombers were Muslim and seemed to be white, but Sirota definitely didn't want them to be Muslim because undoubtedly war would break out.

The American people are better than that. We are better than Sirota's claims and fears and bloviating.

In the same year, Sirota also praised now dead Venezuelan dictator Hugh Chavez and how he achieved an "economic miracle" in the country by advancing socialism and redistribution of wealth. 

Yes, having to use the Communist Manifesto to wipe your butt is, in a way, a sign of progress, but for Chavez, it was unintentional that his people would have to do such a thing due to lack of toilet paper and other basic necessities, like electricity, that socialism has determined weren't necessary. 

Like Brooklyn Bernie, Sirota is a useful idiot to the cause of socialism. He probably owns a "Che" tee shirt.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet