Muslims fear "backlash" from non-radical infidels

It seems that whenever there's a radical Muslim terror attack the liberal media worries that the vast right wing nut jobs will go after Muslims. We saw this after the radical Muslim terrorist attack on 911 of 2001 and 2012, and after Nidal Hassan (the Muslim psychiatrist whose business card indicated he was a "Soldier of Allah") killed unarmed American soldiers at Foot Hood--oh, wait--that didn't happen. There was no right wing nut job backlash. How can that be?

The "Paper of Outhouse" Washington Post published a piece by Kevin Sullivan, Sarah Pulliam Bailey and Elahe Izadi (whose father has a high probability of being named "Mohammad") about the possibility of an intense backlash against Muslims by the American public.

Attacking infidels and then saying you are worried about a backlash is exactly what Muslims have done since they began causing global warming way back beginning in 624 A.D. 

They always seem to point outward, never inward--it isn't them, it's you who are the terrorists. "You made me do it. It's all your fault." 

Doesn't Islam sound like an abusive husband after beating his wife? "You made me do it."

Rabia Chaudry

Anyway, getting back to that bathroom tissue called The Washington Post, the article never speaks about what has happened, it only talks about the fears Muslims have about what might happen. It's a narrative as honest as Hillary's explanations of her emails and Benghazi.

That kind of hype is what the left always spews after soft-target Americans are slaughtered in gun-free zones. But the left cannot name one actual backlash to use as an example of what to worry about. Not one.

The article's lead incident of "backlash" as described by Rabia Chaudry (her friends call her "Rabid") goes like this:

Rabia Chaudry kept her 7-year-old daughter home from her private Islamic school in Maryland on Thursday, fearing anti-Muslim backlash from Wednesday's massacre nearly 3,000 miles away in San Bernadino, Calif. (my italics).

"I think we are all feeling exhausted and very vulnerable, " said Chaudry, a lawyer and national security fellow at the New America Foundation. "I'm angry at those people who did this attack. And I'm angry at how this is being politicized. Everything boils down to, 'We should fear Muslims. And they shouldn't be here.'" 

Being fearful about a backlash doth not a backlash make. I know children who are afraid of the monsters under the bed, but I checked and they must have gone. And kids in a private Muslim school are hardly likely to cause a backlash with her kid.

It appears that Ms. Chaudry is feeling as vulnerable as many Americans are right now. We feel vulnerable because we have a president whose only balls are on the golf course. Chaudry feels vulnerable because, well, she's either hallucinating or lying through her tooth.

After every radical Muslim terrorist attack, Obama makes perfunctory speeches about the "unacceptable behavior," while refusing to call it radical Islamic terrorism. He does everything to protect the image of Islam, even to the point of insulting Christians about how we were responsible for the Crusades. His rhetoric is appalling.

Obama's attempts at moral equivalency between Islam and Christianity are as feeble as Anthony Weiner's attempts at trying to find true love on Twitter.

The Crusades was in response to the Muslims attempting to gain European domination over the Christians, not simply Christians attacking Muslims.

There they go again--pointing outward instead of inward.

P.S. Check out the New America Foundation. 

Tweet

Geraldo says 2nd Amendment is stupid

Watching "The Five" when Geraldo Rivera is on the panel is like watching a flaming liberal throw a hissy-fit with conservatives. In order to successfully accomplish this arduous task, it is best to take an anti-nausea medication and several glasses of wine. But what Rivera tweeted out in the middle of the San Bernadino terrorist attack was too disgusting to assuage.

The self-described "war journalist" and hero extraordinaire tweeted: "Mass shooting in San Bernadino California at a Center for the Developmentally Disabled WTF! The 2nd Amendment is Stupid!!! Don't rationalize."

Rivera loves to call the Second Amendment "stupid" because he doesn't seem to know why it isn't stupid, which makes him stupid. 

Last August a firearms instructor was accidentally killed by a 9-year-old boy on the gun range. The day of the shooting, Rivera posted on Facebook (which for a TV personality is a stupid thing to do, and you will understand why when you read below).

"Like I always say, the 2nd Amendment, the provision that gives every American the right to keep and bear arms, is blind and stupid. In its relentless pimping for the gun industry, the NRA has unleashed an avalanche of deadly weapons on this gun-crazy country. Just as it protects access to weapons for cops and hunters, it also protects access to weapons for domestic abusers, mental patients, jerk-offs on the no-fly list, all-around dim bulbs, and now little children."

So for Rivera, the Second Amendment is stupid in all cases, which is incredibly stupid to say. 

Our founding fathers were wise enough to know that absolute power corrupts absolutely, and taking that power from the people, as Hitler did back in the 30's by confiscating all guns, was his way to make the country impotent to stop his rise to dictator.

A Weiner-esque moment

The claim that "the NRA has unleashed an avalanche of deadly weapons on this gun-crazy country" is like saying "that crazy guy, Henry Ford, has unleashed an avalanche of deadly automobiles on this car-crazy country."

The fact that Rivera used terms like "jerk offs" and "WTF" on his Facebook page doesn't show that he's 'cool' or 'fresh,' it shows that he's stupid.

Stupid people believe that guns, not people, kill. They also believe that if you impose strict gun-control laws (which everyone knows is just the start of total gun confiscation the left wants) there will be fewer murders. 

How can you buy a gun if they're outlawed?

Duh.


Tweet

Obama: Shooting possibly terror-related, probably just a workplace disagreement

If the Muslim terrorists stormed a Christmas party, screamed "Allahu Akbar!" adding "Allah is great!" in English (just in case your Arabic is rusty) and began shooting unarmed non-Muslims, then screamed as they fired that all infidels must die in the name of jihad, and there were at least three videos of the event, maybe then Obama would admit that it was a terrorist attack and not workplace violence.

But even then, I'm not sure he would.

The San Bernadino attack by a Muslim husband and wife team, dressed in military-type assault, load-bearing garb, carrying AK 47-style weapons with hundreds of available rounds, and two pistols, killed 14 and wounded about 20. 

Pipe bombs were found in their rented apartment along with material for building more bombs, and thousands of rounds of ammunition.

The wife handed over their 6-month-old baby to the grandparents just prior to the attack because jihadists don't bond well with actual innocent humans, even after jihadist mothers breastfeed them. Farooq, the husband, grew a "Mohammad-style" beard (sans mustache), and became increasingly more Islamic it was reported.

The attack was probably not an attack on co-workers. The attack was on Christmas itself. Just like the attacks ISIS is boasting to carry out on the Pope, the USA, and of course, Israel.

In spite of this, Obama said Thursday that it was merely possible the mass shooting was a terror attack. It has gotten to the point where Obama has gone beyond not saying the words "radical Islamic terror" attack. Now he has dropped the word "terror" from describing radical Islamic terror attacks unless it is unequivocally proven to be so--unless, of course, there is some kind of verbal loophole that can get him out of saying that.

His "go-to" position is workplace violence, like he did with the Soldier of Allah, Nadal Hassan, of Fort Hood shooting notoriety. 

His other "go-to" position was to call for more gun control, as if that would have prevented the killings. If the shooters were white, that would have been another "go-to," or if they were members of the NRA, or Christian or hard right wing conservatives. 

But since they were Muslims, blame the guns. Never, under any circumstances, blame the religion of peace.

Even the term 'religion of peace' has become a sardonic joke, much like our so-called president.

Of course it's possible there were different motives behind this horrible slaughter, but I would look at it as a radical Muslim terrorist attack first, and rule out the possibility of workplace violence--not use it as my first hypothesis.

Tweet

A Brain Flushing

There was a mass shooting just minutes ago in San Bernadino, California. There were reportedly 3 shooters, dressed in body armor and masks. The shooters were heavily armed with assault weapons, it was reported. There are at least 3 people dead, 20 wounded. but these numbers are subject to change.

Sadly, the loved ones of the dead are going to get little or no attention, but the politicians sure as hell will use this shooting to further their agendas.

Obama will call for more gun control. Conservatives will say if there were weapons in the hands of the people under attack, the shooters might have been stopped before they inflicted the amount of human damage they caused.

And the media will play their words on a continuous loop until we're sick of hearing them and beyond. 

I hope I'm wrong.

Tweet

UPDATE: Mass Shootings in San Bernadino, CA

There is an active situation in San Bernadino, California. It is confirmed that there were 3 hooters who may have already fled the scene, possibly in a black SUV. Witnesses said they were wearing body armor and masks and used rifles.

There are at least 20 wounded and 12 killed, but these numbers are likely to change.

A device was also discovered by authorities and before they can enter the building, it will need to be deactivated,  probably by watering it down.

The FBI and ATF are on the scene and people are being told to stay away from the area.

There is a likelihood the shooters intended to escape based on the fact that their faces were covered.

As this is being posted, the buildings are being cleared and it is still unknown if the shooters are still on the scene.

More to follow.

UPDATE: The authorities believe the gunmen escaped, but there might be one holed up in one of the buildings and the police are going to ram in the door to gain entry.



Tweet

Iran's Supreme Bigot

Khamenei with Iranian Tele Prompter

Somehow the terrorists have many on the left convinced that we and Israel are the terrorists and that they are our victims.

The so-called Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, of the terror sponsoring state of Iran spoke on Sunday to appeal "to the youth in Western countries." The U.S. and Jew-hating Ayatollah accused the U.S. of arming and aiding al Qaeda and other terrorist groups and, since he had the microphone at hand, lashed out against Israel for sponsoring "the worst kind of terrorism against the Palestinians.

I suspect that dickweed Khamenei would think better of the Jews if they didn't shoot at the Muslim attackers who were simply trying to stab a Jew or two in accordance with their religious anti-Semitic scripture. "Leave them alone, they're only doing what's been commanded of them by the almighty Allah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam)," he might have said.

So the Islamic State terrorists attack Paris and Khamenei verbally attacks the U.S. for sponsoring terrorists across the planet and for oppressing Muslims for their values.

Values?

Scumcrumpet Khamenei's Iran is launching attacks across the globe and waging war to expand its influence in Syria, Yemen, Lebanon and Iraq. That's called Islamic conquest; it's what they do.

Now Iran's theocratic leader, a moron who judges everything in terms of his brand of Islam, wants Western youth to oppose Israel, a country he believes is worse than any terrorist group operating in the world today.


I imagine he will get enough college-zombies to go along with that kind of thinking. Anti-Semitism is the new avant garde of the left. Sadly, many who fall in line with it are Jews themselves. The reasons for this are psychological and not appropriate for this post.

So the Ayatollah wants our kids to embrace Islam. He believes that it is our values and culture that fuels ISIS et al, as if they wouldn't exist without our freedom of expression. That makes as much sense as Obama blaming terrorism on global warming. 




Tweet

The Hansel and Gretel of the West

Umm

Canada's new Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, is "disappointed" by the United States' fears and "politics of division" playing out over the Syrian refugee situation as we debate the issue of sanctuary to Syrians, the majority of whom are men of military age and also fit the profile of radical Muslim terrorists.

Trudeau spoke to the leftist media, CBC News a few weeks ago, the day his Liberal government gave the details of his suicidal plan to settle 25,000 Syrians in Canada. 

The backgrounds of these so-called refugees is unknown, but hey, I'm sure they're nice folks.

Trudeau planned to settle the Syrians this month, but it will be delayed until February of 2016. This will give the Canadian government enough time to check their suitcases for bombs and other weapons.

Okay, I'm being sarcastic, but I think Trudeau is just another Obama with snowballs. 

I don't trust politicians making these decisions because they're not motivated to do this for the right reasons. It's always about self-interest and votes, which is pretty much the same thing.

The argument is that refugees cannot vote. Sounds good, but what they don't tell you is that electoral votes are based on ALL of the population of a state, even with people who are not eligible to vote.

So if a Democratic state takes in a ton of refugees, they get more electoral votes with the larger population.

The U.S. government pledged to accept 10,000 asylum seekers into the country within a year, but almost two dozen Republican governors said they will not allow Syrians into their state. Obama has the legal authority to override the governors, but he would be going against the will of the majority if he does. Of course, this won't stop him because it isn't the will of the people that concerns him--it's his political ambition.

Trudeau said he was "aware that there might be concerns" about Canada's plan when he spoke with Obama. "On the contrary, he [Obama] was effusive in his support of what we were doing," Trudeau said. "He pointed out . . . that there is more security risk from tourists than there are from refugees," proving that not only is Obama a Hansel lost in the woods, but that Trudeau is his Gretel.  

A Canadian poll recently showed that fully 60% of Canadians oppose the plan to bring in 25,000 Syrian refugees by the end of the year.

Since when does the majority rule?

Trudeau said, "This is about welcoming people who are fleeing terrorism, not bringing terrorism with them." I bet he won't be having them living anywhere near Parliament Hill in Ottawa.

Why aren't the military-age men of Syria willing to fight terrorism in their own land, Mr. Trudeau? Maybe you need to ask Obama that same question.



Tweet

Palestinian man killed; blame it on Mohammad

Jerusalem -- A Palestinian man was killed by Israeli military as he tried to stab a pedestrian at a busy West Bank junction. Another Israeli was also stabbed prior to the Israeli intervention--he was only slightly wounded.

The wave of Islamic anti-Semitism began back when Mohammad was having his scribe write the Koran, the alleged word of Allah, the moon god of the Pagans.

This latest attack in Jerusalem is the latest one in a wave that began in mid-September. The excuse for killing Jews that is being used by Palestinians is over the Jerusalem holy site. Imams and other so-called religious leaders of Islam have called for the killing of Jews to honor the wishes of Mohammad, a guy who was upset when the Jews refused to follow his religion of peace.

Since the September attacks began, 19 Jews have been killed, mostly by stabbings and shootings. On the other side of the scoreboard, 99 Palestinians have been killed, 64 of whom were trying to kill Jews. The remaining 35 Muslim Palestinians died in battles with Israeli forces.

Israel claims the violence is due to Palestinian incitement and incendiary videos on social media. Palestinians say the violence is caused by their frustration over their lack of hope for obtaining independence as a separate state. I say the cause is due to down-home anti-Semitism that began at the start of the religion of peace.

Muslims throughout the world refuse to accept non-Muslims as neighbors and expect special treatment when they are in the minority. Once they gain sufficient numbers in population, they become increasingly violent and act out against infidels, particularly Jews, but they also go after Christians and all other religions that don't "worship" as they do.

Islam is the religion of total intolerance when practiced in an orthodox manner. If you travel to Saudi Arabia, for example, you better not take a Bible or any other religious artifacts, They will be confiscated at the airport and destroyed.

Try doing that to a Koran and see what happens.

"From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," is the chant of the Palestinians. When you look at the words of this chant, it's obvious they are referring to the River Jordan to the Mediterranean Sea. That's all of Israel and all of the Jews therein.

They want it all, so Palestine, stop pretending to be the victim.

Tweet