Alleged "reporter" for CNN in UK "afraid" to travel to US

"I have a British accent, so you must believe me"

 CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, self-styled queen of international journalism, just dropped a stinkbomb so unhinged it could make Kim Jong-un blush. 

The 67-year-old British-Iranian reporter, who’s dodged bullets in war zones like the Gulf and Bosnia, says she geared up for a trip to the U.S. like she was infiltrating North Korea.  The land of the free, home of the brave? More like Pyongyang with better Wi-Fi, apparently.

“I have to tell you, when I went to Harvard to give this speech, and it was just a few days ago last week, I must say, I was afraid,” Amanpour whined on her podcast “The Ex Files,” where she trades hot takes with her ex-husband, former State Department suit James Rubin. 

Afraid of what? The horrors of Harvard Yard? A rogue TSA pat-down? No, she was quaking in her boots about stepping foot in Trump’s America, wait, Biden’s America. 

“I’m a foreigner, I don’t have a green card, I’m not an American citizen, I’m fairly prominent, and I literally prepared to go to America as if I was going to North Korea,” the withering violet said, probably clutching her pearls for dramatic effect. She's ditching her iPhone and iPad for a burner phone. “I took a burner phone, Jamie, imagine that,” she told Rubin, a man who left her for some reason. 

She sounded like she was auditioning for a Jason Bourne flick. The phone had nothing but a few numbers: her assistant, her ex, her kid, and a CNN lawyer. Because nothing screams “I’m ready for Guantanamo” like a Nokia with four contacts.

CNN’s finest compares a U.S. trip to sneaking into North Korea: “I took a burner phone. Imagine that!” Cue the spy music. pic.twitter.com/ash7S47rjG
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman)

Amanpour’s been around war zones, dictatorships, you name it. But apparently, a quick hop to Cambridge, Massachusetts, had her sweating like she was crossing the DMZ. “I was really afraid,” she lied, citing rumors of British citizens getting grilled at the border for “hours and hours and hours.”

 She even consulted CNN’s security team, probably expecting a SWAT escort. 

Spoiler alert: She waltzed through customs without a hitch. “So, huge sigh of relief I breathed,” she admitted, before pivoting to her real point: “But wow, can you imagine if I’m afraid, what do others think?” Others, presumably, being the huddled masses who don’t have CNN’s legal department on speed dial. 

This isn’t Amanpour’s first time when she released unhinged hyperbole. Back in 2020, she made a lazy comparison of Trump’s presidency to Nazi Germany. I bet she claims she made that one up all by herself.

On her CNN show, just days after the 2020 election, she kicked things off with this gem: “This week, 82 years ago, Kristallnacht happened.” You know, the 1938 Nazi pogrom where Jews were attacked, their homes and businesses trashed, and synagogues burned. No biggie, just another Tuesday for Amanpour to link to Trump, and coming from an obvious anti-Semite, she probably shouldn't have gone the way of the Nazis because it hurts her cause.

“It was the Nazis’ warning shot across the bow of our human civilization that led to genocide against a whole identity, and in that tower of burning books, it led to an attack on fact, knowledge, history and truth,” she bloviated. “After four years of a modern-day assault on those same values by Donald Trump, the Biden-Harris team pledges a return to norms, including the truth.”

Yeah, sure, how'd that work out for the Biden bull throwers?

Jewish groups weren’t exactly thrilled, with one telling her to “stop using the horrors of the Holocaust to justify an agenda.” But does the anti-Semitic woman care? Nah. She’s too busy packing burner phones for her next “dangerous” mission to the land of Starbucks and free speech.

This is ⁦⁦@camanpour on⁩ ⁦@CNN⁩ comparing Trump’s tenure to Nazi Germany. How the hell is this sort of prejudice tolerated on mainstream media? Third rate rubbish. pic.twitter.com/EG9eB9vQWo
— Ben Habib (@benhabib6) November 12, 2020

So here we are, folks. Christiane Amanpour, globetrotting "journalist" who stared down warlords, is out here acting like a trip to the U.S. requires a covert op. 

Next time, maybe she’ll just Zoom in from London and save the burner phone for the real dictators.

Tweet

CNN lied to terror victims: now apologizes

More than a month after Christiane Amanpour, a so called journalist from the Compromised News Network, wrongly claimed that Lucy Dee and her two daughters were killed "in a shoot-out," she finally apologized for suggesting that the women were armed during their murder.

“On April 10, I referred to the murders of an Israeli family: Lucy, Maia and Rina Dee, the wife and daughters of Rabbi Leo Dee. I misspoke [aka lied] and said they were killed in a ‘shoot-out’ instead of a shooting,” Amanpour explained in her on-air apology on May 22.

“I have written to Rabbi Leo Dee to apologize and make sure that he knows that we apologize for any further pain that may have caused him.”

However, Amanpour's apology did not mention that the women were victims of a terror attack, nor did it identify or discuss the attackers or their motives.

Last month, the pro-Israel group HonestReporting shared a video clip on Twitter of Amanpour talking about the incident on TV. Lucy Dee and her daughters Maia and Rina were brutally shot at close range in their car by terrorists in an attack that had no provocation. But this is what terrorists do--like the Oct. 7 attack last year when Hamas and other cowards came into Israel and mercilessly killed, tortured, raped and burned to death over 1,200 unarmed Jewish men, women, children and babies. 

🚨On May 11, HonestReporting called out @CNN @Amanpour for misrepresenting the murders of Lucy, Maia, & Rina Dee. Join Rabbi Leo Dee in calling for a public acknowledgment of their mistake. Sign our petition here: https://t.co/4viV813MgH

— HonestReporting (@HonestReporting)

When Amanpour described the attack, she claimed that the mother and daughters were “killed in a shoot-out,” implying that the British-Israeli women were armed and defending themselves in an exchange of fire with the terrorists. Even if that was the case, which it was not, remember who instigated the slaughter of the innocent family.

“A shoot-out is two sides firing at each other,” HonestReporting posted as a caption to the clip. “A mother and her two daughters were shot at close range by Palestinian terrorists.”

Addressing Amanpour, they wrote that “you owe a grieving family an apology.”

Rabbi Leo Dee, the widower and father of the victims, was outraged by Amanpour’s characterization of the murders.

“This is the perfect example of ‘terror journalism’ where you have a moral equivalence between the terrorist and victim,” Dee said in a media statement.

“This type of journalism perpetuates the conflict in the Middle East. The real cycle of violence is a comment like this followed by a terrorist atrocity and then more of the same.”

Tweet

Hillary Clinton goes "Orwellian"--suggests 'formal deprogramming' of Trump supporters, says GOP comprised of bigots

"Ho-ho, hee-hee, strange things are happening to me"

Former first lady, NY Senator, Democrat presidential candidate and two-time loser, Hillary Clinton continues to say stupid things. This time, instead of calling people who don't vote for the Democrat Party "a basket of deplorables," she is now saying the Republican Party is comprised of bigots, and that anyone who supports Donald Trump should undergo 'formal deprogramming.'

How would formal deprogramming work? What would it look like?

Would Republicans have to undergo hypnosis aimed at getting us all to rethink reality, such as "men can have babies too," for example? Would electroshock intervention be called for to decondition conservative values such as killing babies in the womb is immoral; or that free speech is not handed down to us by the government, but by G_d?

Clinton contrasted what she labeled the "sane" part of the GOP caucus who helped prevent a government shutdown with the "cult" wing devoted to Trump. Admittedly, there are some on the right who idealize Trump and give him unrealistic attributes, but let's face it, the dude was a really good president considering the competition.

"That's the way it used to be," Clinton pontificated to CNN's anti-Semite Christiane Amanpour on Thursday. 

"I mean, we had very strong partisans in both parties in the past, and we had very bitter battles over all kinds of things… but there wasn't this little tail of extremism, waving, you know, wagging the dog of the Republican Party as it is today. And sadly, so many of those extremists, those MAGA extremists take their marching orders from Donald Trump, who has no credibility left by any measure. He's only in it for himself. He's now defending himself in civil actions and criminal actions. And when do they break with him?"

Clinton continued, "Because at some point, you know, maybe there needs to be a formal deprogramming of the cult members, but something needs to happen."

That remark obviously amused the biased Amanpour, who, like an amateur reporter, could not contain her gleeful reaction. But they aren't hiding it anymore when it comes to their biases.

The two-time loser as a presidential hopeful predicted that "sadly" Trump will be the 2024 nominee but expressed confidence that the houseplant and alleged Biden would defeat him. She was then asked how she has "processed" her loss to Trump in 2016, seeing as how she is by far the superior person to lead the nation along the road to perdition if anyone is going to do it.

"It's a classic tale of an authoritarian populist who really has a grip on the emotional, psychological needs and desires of a portion of the population," Clinton said, discounting the fact that the so called 'portion of the population' was large enough to defeat her along with her own blasé discounting of parts of the country.

 "And the base of the Republican Party, for whatever combination of reasons- and it is emotional and psychological, sees in him someone who speaks for them, and they are determined that they will continue to vote for him, attend his rallies, wear his merchandise because for whatever reason, he and his very negative, nasty form of politics resonates with them."

"Maybe they don't like migrants, maybe they don't like gay people, or Black people, or the woman who got the promotion at work they didn't get, whatever the reason," Clinton said, clearly misinformed and out of touch with the GOP base who don't have dislike for migrants, just for the lack of law and the disdain for the way the left is allowing some of the migrants, including children, to die in their journey, and how the drug cartels are making so much money in the process. 

And insofar as gay people are concerned, conservatives have been happy to place gay people into high positions, but we don't do so as a matter of inclusiveness--we do it because they're qualified. Richard Grunell comes to mind immediately. As far as Black people, the left refers to those Black conservatives as racists or white supremacists, for some odd reason. They have historically counted on the Black vote while keeping Black folks dependent on the government with handouts, and constantly display the soft bigotry of low expectations of them--voter ID comes to mind.

"So it is like a cult and somebody has to break that momentum. And that's why I believe Joe Biden will defeat them and hopefully then that will be the end and the fever will break. And then Republicans can try to get back to fighting about issues among themselves and electing people who are least, you know, responsible and accountable," she added.

The real cult is the one that worships government and the tyranny of the pink and blue-hair LGBTQ crowd. It's the same cult as the face mask people who even after being told that masks don't stop the spread of Covid, they elected to wear a mask even when alone in their vehicles or on the street.

And while Clinton calls the GOP "election deniers," she needs to get an unbreakable mirror.

Tweet

Rabbi rejects Christiane Amanpour's insincere apology over Palestinian terrorists killing of his family

CNN's British-Iranian employee, Christiane Amanpour, is anything but a journalist, but she plays one on TV. 

When it comes to Israel, and by extension, Jews, she is anything but objective. But she is also not very objective when it comes to Christian groups as well for having equated the incredibly rare religiously-inspired violence cases by Christians and Jews with radical Islam's global, often openly supported mass killing. 

She claimed that American presidents called Israeli settlements "illegal" but it was only one president, Jimmy Carter, and he was not a fan of the Jews or Israel. 

Amanpour even went so far as to misrepresent Ronald Reagan's view of Israel and the settlements. He clearly said "They are not illegal." (NY Times Feb. 3,1981), she claimed he said the opposite.

The fake news "reporter" claimed that "Jewish settlements have inflamed much of the Arab world." The truth is, the Arab world was pissed off at Israel's existence long before a single settlement existed. Arabs have tried repeatedly to destroy the Jewish State, but lost every time. 

But her latest revelation of how she really feels about Israel and the Jews came when she outright lied.

On April 7, Lucy Dee, 48, and her daughters, Rina, 20, and Maia, 16, were traveling along the Jordan Valley, as they were on their way for a Passover visit when they were shot to death near the West Bank settlement of Hamra. The girls died at the scene and the mother died in the hospital several days later. The husban, Rabbi Leo Dee, was riding in a car up ahead and was not physically injured.

[L to R]  Lucy, Maia, Rina

On April 10, Amanpour spoke of the incident during an interview with Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh while asking a question about escalating violence.

“We have a young 15-year-old Palestinian boy who’s been shot and killed by security — Israeli security forces,” she said, referring to the young terrorist who shot and killed them. “We also have the mother of two sisters, Israeli-British sisters. They were killed in a shootout, and now the mother has died of her injuries.”

We "also have" -- spoken as if the terrorist who was killed was the tragedy and the Dee women an afterthought. 

After the network caught flak from its meager viewership, Amanpour apologized to the Dee family for lying about the attack being a "shootout," because real shootouts require bullets flying in both directions. The women were unarmed and defenseless while the 15-year-old "Palestine boy" was doing all the shooting. 

It was never a "shootout." It was a slaughter.

So on Monday Amanpour admitted that she "misspoke" and apologized to Rabbi Leo Dee, after the network learned that he would be suing them for $1.3 billion, with the help of Lawyer and Professor of Law Alan Dershowitz.

She reluctantly sent a written apology to Rabbi Dee but he immediately rejected it, telling Israeli media i24 News that it wasn’t “worth the paper it was printed on.” He said that her comment is typical of CNN  “where they try to make a comparison between the victim and the terrorist” and that “when you make a statement in front of 100 million people on primetime television and then you apologize in an email to a single person, it has one one hundredth of a million of the impact.”

Of course, claiming that 100 million people watch CNN is a gross exaggeration, but the point was well made.

On Sunday, during an event hosted by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, Dee said he was considering filing a $1.3 billion lawsuit against CNN. During the interview with i24, Dee said “there’s only one thing that would atone for this particular sin is that they change their attitude towards Israel.”

Well, he considered it and is apparently going forward with the suit. If CNN looks to settle, I hope he doesn't go along with it.

Tweet

Munich crowd protests anti-Semite Roger Waters concert

Holding "Munich is colorful" signs

Munich, Germany -- Pink Floyd performer Roger Waters was met by over 100 demonstrators Sunday night at his concert at Olympiahalle. They held signs supporting Israel and opposing Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and they also held Israeli and Ukrainian flags to the dismay of Waters, a proud, Jew-hating scumcrumpet.

“Our goal is to fly the flag – in the truest sense of the word,” Micky Wenngatz — a city councillor from the SPD Party and co-organizer of the protest — told local media outlets. 

[H/T Algemeiner.com]

Waters is currently on tour of five German cities in the midst of his support of the BDS [Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, meant to destroy Israel's economy] in addition to his anti-Semitic tropes he has made in his concerts and on media.

The main speaker at the protest in front of the building was the head of the Munich's Jewish community, Charlotte Knobloch. She was quite vocal regarding her anger at the concert going ahead.

“Agitation against Jews clearly has a place in this country,” she said. “Today, this place is the Olympiahalle … Despite all the big words and good intentions, we stand here to protest against the appearance of an anti-Semitic arsonist.”

A number of Waters’ fans heckled Knobloch during her speech, with one man, who was either a Waters-loving anti-Semite or simply ignorant of his racism, displaying his intellect by repeatedly chanting the name “Roger Waters” over and over.

“Go inside and listen to him, if you love him so much,” Knobloch told him.

“There has been a dispute about this concert since October 2022,” said. “Since then, motions and headlines have been produced – to no avail. So here we are, protesting a concert that’s happening exactly how Waters wanted it to happen, with his constant hatred, with his attacks on Israel and with his lies and distortions.”

Rumor has it that Waters has a picture of Hitler on the ceiling over his bed. But it's just a rumor that I made up--pass it on.

The protest rally also had two Ukrainian Jewish refugees who fled the Russian attack on the city of Kharkiv for Germany last year. 

Waters also claimed that Russian fascist President Putin is “fighting fascism.” 

Last February Waters delivered a rambling speech to the UN Security Council at the behest of the Russian mission to the UN. In the Biden-ish utterances, he claimed to be speaking for the world's "voiceless majority" and denounced Ukraine's elected leaders as "provocateurs."

“We want to counter the lies with truth,” Yaroslav Mrzenov told the crowd, while his friend, Tamara Okhrimenko, warned that “these lies and this propaganda are killing people.”

Waters anti-Semitic tropes and outright statements dates back to 2011. Some of the things he has stated in the past are listed below:

In an August interview with World Beyond War, Waters continuously promoted anti-Semitic conspiracies and themes including that a nefarious “Israel lobby” prevented the election of Jeremy Corbyn in the UK rather than the voters who saw Corbyn as the racist POS he is.

When asked about the fighting between Israel and Gaza-based terrorist groups, Waters claimed the Israel thinks Jews are superior to everybody else on the planet, claiming, " . . . religious supremacy, the idea that the Jewish people are somehow superior to everybody else on the planet but particularly the Arabs, the Palestinian Arabs...the Israeli state who believe that the Jewish people are superior, more important than any of those people, those people’s lives are worthless.”

This, of course, is baseless and simply a made up anti-Semitic trope.

In July last year Waters appeared in a video interview with the Canadian Foreign Policy Institute where he demonized Zionists as "settler-colonialists" and incredibly claimed that Jews had no connection to the land of Israel, calling Zionists a "cabal," an anti-Semitic trope: “It’s about a bunch of Europeans back in the middle of the 19th century deciding that they were going to take over this piece of land, and kick out anybody that lived there and take it over for themselves and their own little cabal.”

It seems that Waters gets his history from the Palestinian Authority.

In May 2021, the idiot accused Israel of committing genocide and called the nation an "apartheid state," which is everything Israel is not. Over 21% of Israel's population is Arab and they have full citizenship rights and ten Arabs are in the government's knesset. On the other hand, no Israelis are allowed to live in so called Palestine, and of course there are no Jews in their terrorist-funding government.

This is what 10 miles of stupid looks like

In an April 2019 op-ed regarding Madonna’s performance in the Eurovision contest hosted by Israel, Waters wrote: “To perform in Israel is a lucrative gig but to do so serves to normalize the occupation, the apartheid, the ethnic cleansing, the incarceration of children, the slaughter of unarmed protesters … all that bad stuff.”

Show us where this is happening; I dare him to do that. There is no occupation as he calls it--the land of the Jews dates back to the Old Testament, long before Islam was invented by a Jew-hating leader who incorporated that hatred into his new religion. 

There is no apartheid on Israel's end of the deal; apartheid comes from across the border.

Ethnic cleansing? Are you kidding me? Buy a mirror.

The only "children" that get incarcerated are those caught having killed or tried to kill Israelis. Unlike the Hamassholes and other terrorist groups, the Jews don't kill children nor fire rockets at schools and public places, launching them from their mosques, knowing Israel won't shoot at their "religious" structures or schools, like they do.

The slaughter of unarmed protesters?

That seems to be a problem with Hamas et al. Just last month, a young mother and her two daughters were slaughtered in the Jordan Valley on their way to a Passover get-together. But leave it to Christiane Amanpour and CNN to categorize the slaughter of the three unarmed Jewish women as a "shootout." She just now apologized to the father/husband Rabbi Leo Dee for her "misstatement."

And you wonder why the news coming from the Crappy News Network is as trusted as Joe Biden's stories about Beau dying in Iraq and Hunter being the smartest guy he knows.

But I digress, as I am wont to do when hearing anti-Semitic lies.

Back in March, Munich Mayor Dieter Reiter called the prospect of Waters performing in the city “unspeakable” and “unbearable,” expressing the fear that “anti-Semitic slogans will be thrown around.” But the privately-run venue, the Olympiahalle would have faced breach of contract proceedings had it canceled the concert.

It seems like anti-Semitism and anti-white hatred has become the norm; the former being an old norm, while the latter is more recent. We all need to fight this bigotry and hatred in any reasonable way we can, but violence should only be a response in kind. 

Tweet

Terrorist sympathizer and CNN host claims unarmed Israeli family killed in a "shootout"

When you hear the word "shootout" you think of two sides firing at each other with weapons. Bullets fly in both directions and there's usually a sense of an equal chance of victory to both sides. But when a fake news, anti-Zionist, Jew-hating "reporter" calls the execution of a Jewish family in Israel a "shootout," fake news has reached a new and more disgusting level.

Last week the Compromised News Network's Christiane Amanpour claimed that members of the British-Israeli Dee family were "killed in a shootout." HonestReporting, a media watchdog organization, showed video of Amanpour making the claim about mother Lucy Dee and her daughters Maya and Rina.

The media watchdog noted, “A shootout is two sides firing at each other. A mother and her two daughters were shot at close range by Palestinian terrorists.”

But people like Amanpour don't see terrorist acts as terror, they see it as freedom fighters that fight for their cause.

Terrorist in training

The Jerusalem Post reported that the Israeli Consulate in Atlanta intends to send a letter of complaint to the Crappy News Nitwits. It's doubtful that they'll apologize or do anything about their so called reporter, but to do nothing would be a crime. The outlet also said that the Israeli Foreign Ministry confirmed they are working on the letter.

The murders of the Dee mother and daughters occurred over the Passover holiday as they drove through the Jordan Valley and terrorists fired multiple rounds at their car, shooting them over 20 times. 

Tell us, Amanpour, how the hell is that considered to be a shootout?

The family patriarch, Rabbi Leo Dee, told HonestReporting that he demands an apology, The Jerusalem Post reported.

“This is the perfect example of ‘terror journalism,’ where you have moral equivalence between the terrorist and victim,” Rabbi Dee told The Post. “This type of journalism perpetuates the conflict in the Middle East,” he added. “The real cycle of violence is a comment like this followed by a terrorist atrocity and then more of the same.”

Tweet

Dr. Fauci still useless after all these years: refuses all blame for his pandemic remedies

THE SCIENCE

Dr. Tony "The Science" Fauci, the former director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Trump appointed pandemic guru, rapped in an interview this week. He put down that "whitey and the rest of you clowns" need to "step down" and quit aiming "finger guns" at him because it's "time to end the blame game 'bout the Covid thing."

Comedy News Network's devout anti-Zionist Christiane Amanpour asked The Science what he thinks he and his science community screwed up or "got wrong" with the useless policies they implemented and demanded the public obey under penalty of death.

“What are the real takeaways, the real lessons for public health?” she queried Doctor Science.

“I think we have to get away from the blame game because so many of the things that you have mentioned were unknowns at the time,” Fauci responded. “It’s so easy.”

Except that at the time, he made it sound as if he knew so many of the things he now says he didn't know.

“This is really big time Monday morning quarterbacking here, which is what it is,” he now claims. “So, rather than have a blame game, and that’s one of the things that we have to stay away from because there were things that happened and it was a moving target and there were things that you did not know at the time and you had to, out of necessity, make a decision.”

Sorry "Science," you don't get to walk away from your mess and say you didn't make it.

TRANSCRIPT:

CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: You know, there were many instances, and we could play many and repeat many, you’re obviously very familiar, but, you know, the fisticuffs with people in Congress, presidential candidates, senators, governors, DeSantis, you know, and other people who just basically blamed you. They basically blamed you. They said everything you did was contrary to saving lives. As if you were in full charge.

So, I realize you’re going to say, well, no, I wasn’t in full charge. But I want to know what you think you and the community got wrong. Was the closing of the schools too draconian? How much of a delay did the fact that nobody fully understood the asymptomatic spread of this, nobody figured out that it could actually bus through certain vaccine levels as well?

THE SCIENCE: Yes, yes.

AMANPOUR: What are the real takeaways, the real lessons for public health?

THE SCIENCE: Yes. I think we have to get away from the blame game because so many of the things that you have mentioned were unknowns at the time. It’s so easy, and I made that comment in my response to one of the questions that Davis Wallace-Wells asked me in the —

AMANPOUR: This is in “The New York Times” profile.

THE SCIENCE: In the “The New York Times” profile. And I didn’t mean it as an affront to him, but I said, you know, this is really big time Monday morning quarterbacking here, which is what it is. So, rather than have a blame game, and that’s one of the things that we have to stay away from because there were things that happened and it was a moving target and there were things that you did not know at the time and you had to, out of necessity, make a decision.

And sometimes the decision was partially right. For example, let me give you an example of a partially right decision. I think the idea, when you having trucks, that were cooler trucks, pulling up to hospitals in order to put bodies in because the morgues were overflowing and the hospital beds were being challenged that you had a triage, you had to shut down. I don’t think anybody who has any realistic evaluation knows that you’ve got to do something dramatic.

Once that’s done, then the thing that you need to now go back and analyze, I don’t think anyone would argue with the fact that you had to shut down, is how long you keep the shut down and how complete it is, how does that relate to schools when you shut down schools, if you do. And I have been very vocal about this and I think that people who like to point fingers, I say, go look and look at the tape. You know, the tale of the tape, when I kept on saying over and over again, we’ve got to get the children back to school as quickly as possible. We’ve got to get them in school safely and we’ve got to make sure that they are not essentially out of school, at home, getting it over the negative consequences.

Different parts of the country interpreted that differently. There were schools that stayed closed far too long and longer than they should have and there were those that essentially didn’t close at all. You know, my daughter is a school teacher in New Orleans, they closed out for two weeks, and we’re essentially open for the rest of the time and other schools —

AMANPOUR: The result was?

THE SCIENCE: And the result was, you know, they didn’t do too badly. I mean, the kids got infected, a lot of them did, you know, virtually. It was very difficult to determine, and say, well, if you shut down this long, you get no negative effect on the child and minimum effect on the infection, those studies weren’t done. It was just trying to do as best as you can in these circumstances that you are in.

So there you have it. You can easily see how Amanpour's questioning failed to seriously challenge Fauci and instead, her questions sounded more like a "blame game" against the GOP, and Gov. DeSantis in particular. She also implied that Fauci wasn't fully in charge, but at the time, when he labeled himself "The Science," when the world was scared of dying, Fauci was in charge and acted like it. And now he still refuses to take any responsibility for his incompetence.

Remember when he said, [and I paraphrase] that people who did not listen to his wisdom were not following "the science." Now he admits he knew as much about what to do in regarding the pandemic as barbers knew when they were performing surgery in the 19th Century.

CNN remains as competent reporting the news as President Biden is piloting an F-35.

Tweet

CNN "reporter" obscenely compares Israel with Syria

On January 5th, the Contemptuous News Network (CNN) reporter Christiane Amanpour once again could not contain her deluded disdain and prejudice against Israel. She obscenely compared the defensive actions of the Jewish State to those of the Syrian regime in an interview with Dror Moreh, the Israeli director of the film "The Corridors of Power." They were discussing topics of Ukraine, Bosnia, the Holocaust, Kosovo and Syria.

Amanpour asked Moreh:  “You are an Israeli. I don’t know whether you were in Israel at the time, but you said that this red line in the neighboring country of Syria, where all these atrocities were being committed really, really made you angry and upset. Many will want to know, you know, do you feel equally angry about the horrible situation that’s going on in your own country, and the human rights attacks, killings of Palestinians? Obviously, we know Israelis are also attacked, but what is your perspective, as an Israeli given the whole ‘never again’ paradigm in which you place this investigation?”

The comparison is obscene.

In the 10 years of Syrian conflict, more than 306,000 civilians have been killed, not including military.

In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, starting in December 1987 when the First Intifada began, up until May 2021, approximately 14,000 lives were lost on both sides, including civilians and combatants. Unlike the Syrian conflict in which around 30,000 civilian lives were lost, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict averaged about 400 lives in total. This includes the most deadly periods such as the Second Intifada and other operations against Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza.

Obviously, the Syrian civil war cost more than twice as many lives in a single year than has been killed in the 34 years of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This is not to say that any of these lives do not matter, but to make a similar comparison is bizarre.

What makes Amanpour's statement even more bizarre and morally obscene is her obvious partisan framing. Syrian regime atrocities targeted civilians, barrel bombing hospitals and using chemical weapons on civilian neighborhoods. The only people specifically targeting civilians in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, was Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. 

But the so-called 'reporter' frames the latter conflict as the "killings of Palestinians." She kind of mentions that the Israelis were "also attacked" as if it was an afterthought, while forgetting to mention that the majority of deaths in 2022 (167 as of Dec. 13, according to the Palestinian Authority) occurred when they were attacking Israelis!

Others were killed in crossfire, or in the context of clashes. It's like saying the coalition strikes against Islamic State was the "killing of Muslims" without mentioning their affiliation and what those Muslims were doing.

However, the 31 Israelis killed by Palestinians last year, 27 of them were civilians who were deliberately targeted. So if Amanpour wants to make comparisons, she would be more accurate to say that the Palestinians act more like the Syrian regime in targeting people.

These Israeli deaths occurred during a significant growth of terrorist activity in the West Bank. According to Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a non-partisan think tank organization, there were 796 Palestinian terror attacks between March to December 2022.

Christiane Amanpour's reality is butt-backwards. Her propagandistic description and implication does not comport with the data that shows Israel has targeted combatants in the context of repelling deadly Palestinian terrorist attacks against civilians, even Israeli schools. 

There is an avenue for debate as to specific Israeli policies and procedures, but to compare Israel to Syria is, as I said, obscene, both statistically and morally.

But it comes as no surprise that Amanpour holds contempt for Israel and places hatred over veracity.

Tweet

CNN finally fires "Team Hitler" producer

Ilhan Omar's doppelgänger?

It took HonestReporting, a media watchdog organization, to expose a Compromised News Network (CNN) producer who covered Israel before the network fired him. This is a person who posted pro-Hamas and "Team Hitler" messages on Twitter [BEM: aka Before Elon Musk] and nobody at CNN seemed to notice. 

[H/T unitedwithisrael.org]

“After HonestReporting notified CNN of their producer’s offensive social media history, a spokesperson immediately assured us the matter was being investigated,” said HonestReporting in a recent statement.

“A deafening silence followed, however, leaving us wondering whether CNN was serious about dealing with an employee who glorified Adolf Hitler and lavished praise on a terrorist group,” the watchdog outlet added.

The scumcrumpet to whom HonestReporting referred is Idris Muktar Ibrahim, who was contributing reporting to the network’s international desk, including coverage of Israel.

Ibrahim received a degree from the University of California Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism, which apparently didn't teach him about bias reporting. The creep posted the hashtag "Team Hitler" about a soccer match between Israel and Germany, which had as much taste as a Feces McMuffin.

The anti-Semite also championed the Palestinian terror group Hamas, referring to its members as “modern day freedpm fighters [sic]” who are “definding [sic] their land.” He obviously doesn't check his work as he spells worse than a first grader during the pandemic.

Speaking of first graders, HonestReporting also noted that "just hours after Ibrahim posted” this tweet, “a Hamas rocket struck a kindergarten in the southern Israeli town of Gan Yavneh.”

CNN initially took no action regarding Ibrahim's overt anti-Semitic sentiments so HonestReporting took action by calling on its social media followers to contact the network.

After that, CNN sent HonestReporting this message: “Idris was employed as a freelancer by CNN. We were not aware of these tweets, which were published before we began working with him. We have informed him that we will no longer be working with him in the future.”

JNS.org quoted HonestReporting executive director Gil Hoffman as saying, “We at HonestReporting will continue to make sure that those who call for the annihilation of the Jewish people will not report the news about the Jewish state.”

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Critical Race Theory, ignorance, The New York Times, and bovine flatulence. You also help me and the orphans. Thanks.

* * *

This isn't the first time CNN has experienced controversy over anti-Semitism. During the Trump administration, CNN's Christiane Amanpour likened Kristallnacht [the "night of broken glass" in which on November 9th to 10th 1938, Jewish-owned businesses, synagogues and Jews were targeted and 90 Jews were killed by the Nazis] to the former President's administration. Thus, like many anti-Semites, Amanpour diluted what the Holocaust was really about. She eventually apologized, but don't they all.

Tweet

CNN's Amanpour worries Taliban 'repressive regime' won't respect USA after SCOTUS abortion ruling

Joke journalist for the Comedy News Network, Christiane Amanpour, [aka کریستیان امان‌پور] claims that she's worried other countries would see the U.S. as a budding "repressive regime" that doesn't support women's rights to kill their unborn babies after the SCOTUS left abortion policies up to the individual states where they belong.

The British-Iranian was reacting to "President" Joe Biden's ramblings to reporters about protecting a woman's right to kill her baby after the landmark decision was made. She opined that world leaders [many of whom head countries with much stricter abortion laws than the US] were upset about women's right and democracy, in spite of the fact that the SCOTUS decision was more democratic because it left it up to the majority voters within each state. You can't get more democratic than that.

"[T]hey expressed sadness and concern and deep worry for the specific Roe V. Wade being overturned and the — what it means to women's rights," she said, namedropping various European leaders, like a loser who hopes to impress others.

The CNN anchor suggested the U.S. would soon be viewed as a repressive regime on the global stage, but like Johnny Depp's marital bed, she is full of crap. Try killing your unborn after 14 weeks in France or Spain, mothers; it ain't gonna happen. And in Egypt, only in special cases where the woman's life is in danger, which is rare, or if the child has severe abnormalities can a woman have an abortion.

"And let us just not forget that I've covered repressive regimes who have set back women's rights throughout my career, never in the history of women's rights in America have we seen such a reversal in a developed country. It just hasn't happened, and the rest of the world is watching this very, very closely as America talks about, you know, shoring up democracy abroad, it really has to happen at home as well. Particularly for women's rights," she bulls**tted.

Shortly afterwards, Amanpour expanded upon her emotional plea by arguing the Taliban wouldn't even respect the United States' commitment to women's rights anymore. Yes, they are so committed to womanhood there, unless a woman shows any skin, in which case she is beaten or stoned to death, depending on the mood of the Taliban leader.

Great example, Chrissy.

CNN's "journalist" has gotten into hot water for comparing the U.S. to murderous regimes before. But it was merely comparing former President Trump to the Nazi regime, so it was okay.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

After the 2020 presidential election, she said on CNN that the Trump presidency reminded her of the Holocaust. The irony she spewed is that while she comes from England, her family emigrated there from Iran, a country known to deny the Holocaust and hate the Jews, as well as the USA.

But when you think about it, her using Holocaust analogies, like Hitler analogies, dilutes the horrors that emanates from their memory.

Tweet

Israel PM Naftali Bennett calls out Christiane Amanpour for lying

Failing CNN anchor Christiane Amanpour interviewed Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett about his country's policies used to control violent rioting on the Temple Mount and "settlements" [aka Jewish communities] in Judea and Samaria. 

PM Bennett pulled no punches to her obvious bias as she pushed the narrative that the reason for the terror meted out by the Palestinians was due to the stalled peace talks and that both sides are to blame for the cycle of violence, and asked what's he going to do about it.

“I object to the notion of ‘both sides.’ No,” PM Bennett replied. “When they don’t attack us, we have no issues with them. But when they do attack us, I have to fight back and hit them [in] their terror bases, and that’s what any leader would do, and that’s what I’m doing.”

There is no real moral equivalency between Israel and the Palestinians. Israel does all it can to minimize innocent casualties when they retaliate; the Palestinians do all they can to maximize casualties when they target schools, hospitals and dwellings. That's just a fact.

Amanpour went to Twitter to post this:

There’s a constant cycle of bloodshed between Israelis and Palestinians. Can @IsraeliPM @naftalibennett spend political capital to finally end that? He says, “I object to the notion of ‘both sides’… When they do attack us, I have to fight back & hit them at their terror bases.” pic.twitter.com/0bTPKTbUPC

— Christiane Amanpour (@amanpour)

After Amanpour, whose father is Iranian and Bosnian, insinuated that violence carried out by “Jewish settlers” is a major national security concern on par with Palestinian terror, quoting Bennett and an IDF general’s previous remarks on the issue, the premier interrupted her.

“What you’ve been projecting is blatantly false,” Bennett said. “It’s a lie, simply a lie.”

“No, sir, you cannot say that to me. You cannot tell me I’m lying,” replied Amanpour, who appeared taken aback by his factual statement. Of course he can call her a liar--she's a damned liar and stretches the truth to accommodate her agenda. This is a woman who compared Donald Trump to Kristallnacht and the Nazis, and never even mentioned that little part of it being about the killing of Jews.

“I can,” Bennett said. “You’re misrepresenting the facts… I said a tiny minority, and I object [to] the symmetry that you’re trying to create here.”

While violence or vandalism from settlers is unacceptable, it also pales in comparison to deadly Palestinian terror, Bennett said.

“Who’s getting murdered? We’re seeing Palestinians murder Israelis. We’re not seeing Israelis murdering Palestinians, and that’s why there’s no symmetry here…

“I also object, these are not occupied territories, they’re territories in dispute, and we have claims to our own places, as well as them,” he added.

“I get it,” the Israeli leader continued. “No one’s going anywhere. We have to figure out how to live together. That’s my job. To provide security for Israelis, dignity for Palestinians. I’m working on that very hard, and we’re succeeding.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

“The problem is that the Palestinian leadership is totally corrupt, incompetent, so we have to do the job because there’s no one to work with on the other side, and… indeed, we’re adding jobs, better jobs, but at the end of the day, my utmost responsibility is to provide security to the Israeli people.”

Sad to say but Prime Minister Naftali Bennett is right and, while there is bias in all reporters, Christiane Amanpour is too biased to be believable.

Tweet

Iran's Rouhani refuses to allow a quarantine in spite of Iran's massive COVID-19 spread

Don't let the eye glasses fool you--this guy
is no genius

When people think that licking religious shrines will help protect them from coronavirus [COVID-19], they tend to contract coronavirus and pass it on to others who think in similar fashion. Thus, Iran reported the biggest single-day leap of coronavirus deaths.

To add stupidity to injury, Iran's President Hassan Rouhani, ruled out a general quarantine as the pandemic runs amok, because he may be an idiot.

According to their reporting, Iran had over 100 coronavirus deaths Sunday. This was their biggest single-day increase in fatalities since the outbreak began. Many analysts believe that the actual numbers of cases and deaths are much higher than Iran reports, but even so, it has the fourth highest death toll in the world, in spite of some of their religious population licking shrines to ward off the evil virus.

Iran’s Health Ministry reported 113 new deaths, bringing the death toll to 724, and confirmed COVID-19 cases reached nearly 14,000. The country is considered the epicenter of the pandemic in the Middle East. [H/T Fox News]

In addition to ruling out a general quarantine, Rouhani on Sunday said the government was working to keep the nation’s borders open, leading one to believe that he has licked one shrine too many.

Iran blames the U.S. sanctions for why they are slow to adopt reasonable measures to slow the virus' spread. Other Middle East countries have imposed sweeping travel bans and canceled public events while calling on non-essential businesses to close for the coming weeks. Schools and universities have also been temporarily shuttered.

Iranian health officials expressed concerns that if the rapid rise in cases continues, health facilities might not be able to accommodate all the sick.

“If the trend continues, there will not be enough capacity,” Ali Reza Zali, who is leading Iran's campaign against the outbreak, was quoted as saying earlier by the state-run IRNA news agency.

Iran is believed to have around 110,000 hospital beds, of which 30,000 is in the capital, Tehran. Authorities have pledged to set up mobile clinics as needed.

Zali said that “many” of those who have died from the illness caused by the virus were otherwise healthy, a rare admission by local authorities that the virus does not only prey on the sick and elderly but can be fatal to otherwise healthy people.

Health Ministry figures show that while 55 percent of fatalities were in their 60s, some 15 percent were younger than 40, which was previously thought to be a relatively safer age in which to fight COVID-19.

The virus has infected over 150,000 people worldwide and killed more than 5,800. More than 70,000 people worldwide have recovered after being infected.

For most people, the virus causes only mild or moderate symptoms, such as fever and cough. For some, especially older adults and people with existing health problems, it can cause more severe illness, including pneumonia. Most people recover in a matter of weeks.

But the real "silver lining," according to PBS's Christiane Amanpour, is that in spite of all the misery and death, the huge reduction in global aircraft and other transportation, will decrease air pollution. That is a paraphrase, but she really said that.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.






Tweet

Joy Behar never read a U.S Constitution she liked--wants Trump charged for 'hate speech'

"Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.”
― Benjamin Franklin

Joy Behar, the least intelligent host on "The View," asked on Thursday why President Trump has not yet been "charged" with "hate speech." She was being serious when she said, "Why can't he be sued by the ACLU [American Civil Liberties Union] for 'hate speech'"?

“I don’t get it,” she said in a full-throated admission that she doesn't know her derriere from her antecubital fossa. “How does he get away with this?” she wondered, having never actually read nor understood the U.S. Constitution, particularly the First Amendment.

Joyless, as she is known to Megan McCain, was referencing Trump’s recent tweets about four fresh faces of Congress: Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).

The tweets sparked a leftist media feeding frenzy, and created controversy at the president’s campaign rally on Wednesday night in North Carolina where “send her back” was briefly chanted by the crowd about Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN). Trump should have stopped the chant immediately but waited and finally condemned it on Thursday, telling the press: “I disagree with it ... I felt a little bit badly about it ... I was not happy with it, I disagree with it.”

When it first occurred, the "press" and the Democrats contrasted the grace of the late Sen. John McCain, who while on the presidential campaign trail against Barack Obama, stopped a woman from implying that he was from Kenya. That is now, but when McCain was running in 2008, the press and the other hypocrites on the left attacked him as a "racist," "bigot" and whatever else they could get away with.

In a series of Sunday tweets, Trump wrote:

So interesting to see ‘Progressive’ Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run . 

 Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how it is done. These places need your help badly, you can’t leave fast enough.

I’m sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements!

Behar’s idea that Trump should be shut up and charged by the government for saying words is characteristically stupid on her part. Just because speech is offensive, it is protected under the First Amendment and Behar, a failed comedian with a history of controversial statements herself, should be well aware of this.

Earlier this year, another sort of comedian pretending to be a journalist, Christiane Amanpour, said Trump supporters chanting “lock her up” about Hillary Clinton were engaging in “hate speech” and should have been banned from doing so. Amanpour should know better, but it's possible she is from another planet and doesn't quite understand the law.

If you enjoyed this post, consider following my blog, but even if you choose not to do so, please check out the sponsors on this page.

Tweet

Hillary defends Bill, attacks Trump and thinks Americans are stupid

Hillary Clinton, whose greatest accomplishment as NY Senator and Secretary of State was to keep herself out of prison, spoke about her promiscuous and lascivious horny-toad hubby, Bill.

She compared Bill Clinton to President Trump because both men have been accused of sexual harassment--although, unlike Bill, Trump hasn't been accused of rape or of using a cigar as a sex toy.

Hillary told the Comedy News Network's (CNN) Christiane Amanpout on Tuesday that the situations are "different" because the allegations against her husband were "investigated" [except for the rape allegation that actually had actual corroboration, and all the others].

By "investigated" Hillary meant "ignored."

"Well, there's a very significant difference and that is the intense, long-lasting, partisan investigation that was conducted in the '90s," Clinton said out of the side of her mouth. "If the Republicans, starting with President Trump [she then threw up in her own mouth] on down want a comparison, they should welcome such an investigation themselves."

The former failed New York Senator, failed Secretary of State, and failed presidential nominee was presumably referring to the sexual harassment claim made by Paula Jones and perhaps the affair and  oral sex Bill received by Monica Lewinsky after allegedly lying under oath about his affair with Lewinsky.

Of course, she was not referring to the highly credible claim by Juanita Broadderick that Bill Clinton violently raped her because they were not investigated. Her face was bloodied and she told people about what had allegedly happened approximately 30 minutes after the attack.

Hillary went on and on trying to convince us that her husband isn't a slime-ball womanizer who she defends. "Bill had to be incredibly strong, [because women tend to put up a fight] first to be elected, then to be reelected, and to survive," she told CNN [aka: LMAO]. "He really believes Democrats have to be tougher and have to stand up to the bullying and intimidation."

Well, that's just plain Orwellian balderdash. Poor Antifa has to stand up to having to deal with broken baseball bats and broken chains when conservatives try to speak.

President Trump is accused of sexual harassment by 22 liberal women, two of whom are former Miss USA pageant contestants.

Bill Clinton is accused of rape and sexual harassment of several women. I am not excusing President Trump at all for what he is alleged to have done. But for Hillary Clinton to come off defending her husband and by doing so, attack his accusers, is a disgusting, thing to do and hardly something real feminists would condone.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Kerry wants Trump not to do to Germany what Obama did to Israel

London --  Lame Secretary of State John Kerry said on Monday that it is "inappropriate" for Donald Trump to brand German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy a "catastrophic mistake." 

Perhaps Trump should brand it "a really nice gesture in spite of all the problems." Or, perhaps he should just do what the Obama administration has been doing for about 8 years: lie to the American people about what you really think.

"I thought frankly it was inappropriate for a president-elect of the United States to be stepping into the politics of other countries in a quite direct manner" [like President Obama did with Israel], he told CNN's leftist reporter and anti-Zionist Christiane Amanpour on a London visit in the last week of the Obama administration and compliments of the US taxpayer.

"He will have to speak to that; as of Friday, he is responsible for that relationship," the Vietnam War hero added.

Trump told The Times of London and Bild that he respected Merkel but did not go along with her stance on refugees that allowed over a million of them coming into Germany and causing serious problems.

But Trump isn't alone in going after Merkel--the German people are angry at her for the refugee problem. 

Kerry, always the devil's idiot, said "I think we have to be very careful about suggesting that one's strongest leaders in Europe, and most important players with respect to where we are heading, made one mistake or another. I don't think it's appropriate for us to be commenting on that," he said. 

James Taylor agrees with Kerry and wrote a tune to that end, which Kerry plans to have him play some time in the future.

Kerry rejected Trump's accurate description of Merkel's refugee policy as "catastrophic."

"I think she was extremely courageous. I don't think it amounts to that characterization," Kerry said, adding that he also thinks Caitlyn Jenner is courageous for his decision to pretend he's a woman and that James Taylor is courageous for continuing to sing in public.

"It has had some problems, [like the sexual assaults of Cologne and the crime sprees and church burnings and rapes] but everybody has had some problems with this challenge of how to respond as a big nation [except for the Islamic nations that refused to take in any Islamic refugees running from Islamic extremism] a great nation, as the West, where our values, our principles are important with respect for caring for people who are in distress," he said, as Amanpour's cameraman threw up in his mouth.

The CNN interview came just one day after Kerry threw Israel under the proverbial bus at the 70 nation Paris conference on Israeli-Palestinian peace. 

Hypocrisy on a falafel.


Tweet

Obama al-Jazeera bin Lyin

How different is Al-Jazeera's whitewashing of Islamic barbarism from the Obama administration's? Answer: as different as identical twins.

Al-Jazeera America began by pretending it would cover the news honestly and in depth, but it apparently has as much depth as the snake oil salesman, Al Jazeera Gore, who sold them the slot in 2013 from Current.

The National Review obtained an email that directed Al Jazeera's propagandist "reporters" to not use terms such as "jihad," Islamist," and "terrorist." A top executive for the company, Carlos Van Meek, wrote to the New York and Washington newsrooms about how words can become problematic and also said, "One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter."

"Freedom fighter" shoots unarmed cop

Or "activist," if you work for CNN, as Christiane Amanpour called the Charlie Hebdo terrorists who massacred the staff at the newspaper. 

Scum buckets who kill children, behead journalists and others while screaming "Allahu Akbar!" are not freedom fighters. The children and journalists they kill are not in any way compromising their freedom. They are terrorists, and Islamic terrorists to be clear. The people who killed 3000 Americans and others on 911 were not freedom fights or militants; they were terrorists, of the Islamic kind.

Van Meek, who fits his name, said we should call terrorists "militants," or "fighters." He said that calling them extremists is forbidden. "Do not use the term Islamist," he said, because it's a "simplistic label."

Van Meek's level of political correctness has reached a point of pandering to Islamic terrorists. Al Jazeera is a champion at pandering--before they pandered in America, they pandered to Osama bin Laden and his terrorists of the Islamic kind. 

But don't fret, patriots, Al Jazeera has about as many prime-time viewers (18,000) as an Al Sharpton anti-white march.

So what about Obama and the boys on the left? Well, they're trying to convince us that Jordan's plan to swap Sajida al-Rishawi the terrorist, for Muath al-Kaseasbeh, the Jordanian pilot, is not the same as the Bergdahl trade last year. 

Bergdahl, a deserter at best, and a traitor at worst, was traded for the release of 5 Taliban terrorists at worst, and Islamic terrorists at best from Gitmo. 

Eric Schultz from the State Department made the case that the Taliban is not a terrorist group but an "armed insurgency." This Obama butt-boy claimed that "we don't pay ransom, we don't give concessions to terrorist organizations." So by this logic, the Taliban cannot be a terrorist organization because we made a concession. That's what we call an argument from fallacy:

We only make concessions with non-terrorist organizations.
We made concessions with the Taliban.
Therefore, the Taliban is a non-terrorist organization.

What we need to consider, in order to determine whether or not the Taliban is a terrorist organization, is our observations and the answers to the following questions:

1. If the Taliban was designated a terrorist organization during the Obama administration in 2010, and identified Hakimullah Mehsud and Wali ur-Rehman as specially designated global terrorists, has anything changed to declassify the Taliban as terrorists?

2. Does the killing of 141 people, 132 of them children at a Peshawar school by the Taliban, qualify them as terrorists?

3. Does the use of Improvised Explosive Devices, used to indiscriminately kill human beings, qualify the users of such devices (i.e., the Taliban) as terrorists?

If you still think the Taliban is merely an "armed insurgency," you might be a lberal.

Tweet