Posts
 |
| "So tell us why Trump is such a piece of s**t?" |
According to a report by The Geller Report an ABC whistleblower is allegedly planning to release an affidavit attesting that Kamala Harris was given “the same questions that were given during the debate” and was assured that Trump would be “fact-checked” and she would not.
Again, this is alleged and has not been proven to have occurred, but if ABC is anything like CNN, it isn't a crazy conspiracy theory. Who do they think they are--Donna Brazile? Candy Crowley?
In 2003, Streisand tried to suppress photographs of her Malibu home from being published by suing the photographer. However, the lawsuit had the opposite effect, leading to widespread public interest and the viral spread of the photographs that might otherwise have gone unnoticed.
Essentially, the Streisand effect shows how efforts to suppress information can backfire, resulting in the undesired information becoming even more public and widely disseminated.
If it is proved that ABC fed Harris the questions with the pledge to not question her but would instead challenge Trump's claims, heads should roll, indictments should fly and people should be fired.
Mark Penn, a former advisor for the Clintons, is calling on an independent investigation into ABC News for rigging a debate. Below are a few of the posts that address the allegation.
If this turns out to be true, this is a serious breach of journalistic ethics and a death blow to @ABCNetwork reputation. https://t.co/lRZA9CZTpx
There are actually 5 whistleblowers now. Even former Clinton adviser Mark Penn is calling for ABC to probe if there was some effort at "rigging the outcome of this debate." Additionally, a very short video is circulating of Linsey Davis who is a sorority sister of Kamala Harris,… pic.twitter.com/4WyBG4Vykm
— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) September 12, 2024
🚨BREAKING: It is now confirmed that Kamala Harris cheated and rigged the debate.
– Kamala was given the questions before the debate.
– Kamala was told that she would not be fact checked no matter what she said and that Trump would be fact checked. pic.twitter.com/evP3v7XRrz
— Philip Anderson (@VoteHarrisOut) September 12, 2024
The real losers were ABC and its two partisan moderators, Muir and Davis. They sought to warp a debate, disgraced their network, and offered a good reminder why such media “moderators” should never be allowed anywhere near presidential debates. https://t.co/2nHe16lcL0The ABC “fact-checks” were fake, which has inversely drawn MORE attention to these topics, aka the Streisand Effect, which is a social phenomenon that happens when there's an attempt to censor or hide information but inadvertently brings more attention to it.
— Victor Davis Hanson (@VDHanson) September 12, 2024
 |
| Besties |
In 2003, Streisand tried to suppress photographs of her Malibu home from being published by suing the photographer. However, the lawsuit had the opposite effect, leading to widespread public interest and the viral spread of the photographs that might otherwise have gone unnoticed.
Essentially, the Streisand effect shows how efforts to suppress information can backfire, resulting in the undesired information becoming even more public and widely disseminated.
If it is proved that ABC fed Harris the questions with the pledge to not question her but would instead challenge Trump's claims, heads should roll, indictments should fly and people should be fired.
No comments:
Post a Comment