Jerry Nadler's eyebrows lash out at Trump over 9/11 attacks

Jerrold Nadler Chair-cis-man of the House Judiciary Committee (D-NY) and a guy who's milking it for all it's worth, went on the predictable anti-American attack against a sitting president who tweeted a video over in response to the dismissive remarks freshman Repulsive Ilhan Omar (D-MN) made about the worst terrorist attack on American soil on 9/11.

The formerly morbidly obese Nadler said Trump has “no moral authority” to talk about the deadliest terror attack on U.S. soil and called out Trump for reportedly taking a $150,000 government grant offered to small business owners in lower Manhattan following the 9/11 attacks.

“He wasn’t president then, but Donald Trump actually took a $150,000 grant from the Bush administration,” Nadler said on the  Communist News Network's “State of the Union.” “He stole $150,000 from some small businessperson who could’ve used it to help rehabilitate himself.”

Actually, stealing doesn't really mean that. He would have needed to literally take the money from some small businessperson who had it in his or her possession. But I'll let that go for now.

The building "Jumping Eyebrows" Nadler is referring to is 40 Wall Street, also called The Trump Building. 

Some Trump critics [e.g., everyone on the left] of the president have brought up a clip of him being interviewed on a local New Jersey news station on the morning of the attack, where the then-real estate mogul pointed out that with the collapse of the twin towers, 40 Wall Street is now the tallest building in lower Manhattan.

Is anyone who's reading this believe that Trump never says stupid things? This one was pretty insensitive, but like I said with Nadler's statement, I'll let it go for now.

The controversy surrounding Trump and CAIR's new darling of the jihad, Ilhan Omar, began when the president tweeted the video of the burning World Trade Center towers and Omar speaking last month at the Council on American-Islamic Relations, where she said the organization was founded because "some people did something" and Muslims "were starting to lose access to our civil liberties."

"For far too long we have lived with the discomfort of being a second-class citizen and, frankly, I'm tired of it, and every single Muslim in this country should be tired of it," she said in the March 23 speech, according to video posted online. "CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties."

Of course she lied. CAIR was founded in 1994--even they admit that--but its membership went, shall we say, ballistic, after the attacks. But did any non-violent Muslim lose their civil liberties? 

Of course not. She is making a straw man argument that has no merit.

Omar has made ongoing anti-Semitic, anti-Israel statements for years, for which she has never actually apologized.

Her comments sparked an ugly episode among House Democrats after they responded with a totally watered-down resolution condemning everything from Islamophobia to hatred of the boss-eyed, and, oh yeah, the Jews too.

Omar has not backed down from her comments. She tried to equivocate her words with those of President George W. Bush, who said days after the attacks, standing in front of the rubble at Ground Zero: "The people — and the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon!"

"Was Bush downplaying the terrorist attack?" Omar tweeted. "What if he was a Muslim."

Actually, when Bush said these words, the perpetrators of the attack were not yet known. His words were clearly saying that once we find out who killed almost 3,000 Americans, we're going to hunt them down and kill them. What Omar said simply minimized the act itself. Had she said her words in front of the rubble and the still smoldering ash, it would have meant exactly what Bush had said.

Several top Democrats – and a number of 2020 presidential hopefuls – have rushed to publicly defend Omar because they are all afraid for their jobs.

House Speaker Nancy "Dancing Hands" Pelosi scolded Trump for using the "painful images of 9/11 for a political attack" against the anti-Semite and jihad apologist.

And presidential candidate Elizabeth "Heap Big Story" Warren, campaigning in New Hampshire, accused Trump of "trying to incite violence and to divide us, and every political leader should speak out against that."

Warren, a Massachusetts senator, said Republican leaders in Congress "cannot take a pass on this, cannot look the other way and pretend it isn't happening. It is happening. And those who don't speak out in the Republican leadership are complicit in what he is doing. It's wrong."

No, saying that the attacks on 9/11, the way Omar said it, that "some people did something" incites anger, and anger often incites violence, not the president pointing it out.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) noted that a New York man recently was charged with threatening Omar's life, and somehow that's Trump's fault. Let's not forget, Klobuchar throws things at her staff--she could take out an eye doing that.

"The video the president chose to send out today will only incite more hate," Klobuchar said. "You can disagree with her words — as I have done before — but this video is wrong. Enough."

No, the video is merely the visual event that Omar was minimizing. THAT IS WHAT'S WRONG, you moron.

Not one 2020 Democrat hopeful have ever condemned Omar's anti-Semitic remarks or Rashida Tlaib calling a sitting president a "Mother f***er."

Trump's ego does a lot of his talking--bragging about his building being the tallest after the Twin Towers came down is a great example of this. He should not have said it, but that isn't the same thing as Ilhan Omar saying the Jews have hypnotized the world--that's a anti-Semitic trope, and Omar knows a lot of them.

And Nadler saying that Trump doesn't have the moral authority to speak about the 9/11 attacks is asinine. All Americans have the moral authority to express their feelings and thoughts about that day. As our president, he not only has the moral authority to talk about that, he has an obligation to respond to such a callous description of the attack.

I lived in Brooklyn at the time--about 4 miles from GZ--and had to clean burnt papers that had been blown from the Twin Towers into my roof gutter because the wind had blown south. 

So Democrats, don't lecture us about the video or inciting violence--you are the ones defending those who misrepresent violence.

Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet