Rep[ulsive] Adam Schiff (D[weeb]-CA) is once again condemning President Trump and claims he has evidence of collusions with the Russians, which in itself is not illegal unless there's evidence of a conspiracy to go along with it.
Schiff[less]'s comments come in light of Attorney General William Barr's four-page summary of Robert Mueller's investigation, which Barr wrote found no evidence beyond reasonable doubt that President Trump colluded with Russia to swing the 2016 presidential election.
The House Intel Committee chair-dweeb continues to insist that, despite the fact that there aren't anymore indictments, President Trump committed acts that were "deeply unpatriotic, unethical and corrupt," which is almost as bad as accusing a sitting president of something that is factually groundless, at least by what is clearly known.
“There is plenty of evidence of collusion and corrupt co-mingling of work between the Trump campaign and the Russians,” Schiff claimed during an appearance on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Wednesday. “But I fully accept that as a prosecutor that he couldn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that crime.”
There is also no proof that Adam Schiff beats his wife and nobody could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he does so on a regular basis . . . or maybe the other way around, but maybe he does. I don't know for sure and I accept the fact that there's a lack of evidence, but I suspect that he just might be beating the hell out of his wife or she's beating him.
Schiff added that although he accepts Robert Mueller's ruling that President Trump could not be legally implicated in corruption, but does not necessarily believe that means the president didn't commit a crime, anymore than Schiff may or may not have committed treason. But all this negative talk about a sitting president gives me pause and I have to wonder if Schiff is working for the Russians. There seems to be some evidence that he may be working for them because he is doing exactly what they would want him to do under the circumstances.
“I always said, well, there was ample evidence of collusion in the public record,” Schiff claimed. "Whether Bob Mueller could prove the crime of conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt would be up to him and I would accept his judgment and I do.”
In addition, Schiff addressed the allegations put forth by Trump's former lying lawyer Michael Cohen.
Cohen said that Trump was aware of Roger Stone's efforts to work with Wikileaks to release damaging information about Hillary Clinton ahead of the 2016 presidential election. Again, Schiff is falling right into Putin's pocket. He also lied to the Mueller investigation, is a known liar, and is going to prison for lying, so take whatever he says as a lie unless he can prove otherwise.
“There is no doubt about how the president touted the Wikileaks releases,” Schiff claimed. “All of this is in the public domain, and whether it is criminal or not, as I said the other day in committee, it’s deeply unpatriotic, unethical, and corrupt.”
Schiff and other House leaders have demanded Attorney General Barr provide the full, un-redacted Mueller report, and voted to authorize a subpoena for the documents on Wednesday. Naturally, this is a political ploy because it is unlawful for the names of the innocent and other sensitive material to be released until it has been reviewed and properly redacted to protect them and the sensitive information.
Many conservative figures have argued that a judge will likely not issue a subpoena for the documents because it contains sensitive information about individuals who are not going to be indicted on any crime.
Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.
Tweet
Schiff[less]'s comments come in light of Attorney General William Barr's four-page summary of Robert Mueller's investigation, which Barr wrote found no evidence beyond reasonable doubt that President Trump colluded with Russia to swing the 2016 presidential election.
The House Intel Committee chair-dweeb continues to insist that, despite the fact that there aren't anymore indictments, President Trump committed acts that were "deeply unpatriotic, unethical and corrupt," which is almost as bad as accusing a sitting president of something that is factually groundless, at least by what is clearly known.
“There is plenty of evidence of collusion and corrupt co-mingling of work between the Trump campaign and the Russians,” Schiff claimed during an appearance on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Wednesday. “But I fully accept that as a prosecutor that he couldn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that crime.”
There is also no proof that Adam Schiff beats his wife and nobody could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he does so on a regular basis . . . or maybe the other way around, but maybe he does. I don't know for sure and I accept the fact that there's a lack of evidence, but I suspect that he just might be beating the hell out of his wife or she's beating him.
Schiff added that although he accepts Robert Mueller's ruling that President Trump could not be legally implicated in corruption, but does not necessarily believe that means the president didn't commit a crime, anymore than Schiff may or may not have committed treason. But all this negative talk about a sitting president gives me pause and I have to wonder if Schiff is working for the Russians. There seems to be some evidence that he may be working for them because he is doing exactly what they would want him to do under the circumstances.
“I always said, well, there was ample evidence of collusion in the public record,” Schiff claimed. "Whether Bob Mueller could prove the crime of conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt would be up to him and I would accept his judgment and I do.”
In addition, Schiff addressed the allegations put forth by Trump's former lying lawyer Michael Cohen.
Cohen said that Trump was aware of Roger Stone's efforts to work with Wikileaks to release damaging information about Hillary Clinton ahead of the 2016 presidential election. Again, Schiff is falling right into Putin's pocket. He also lied to the Mueller investigation, is a known liar, and is going to prison for lying, so take whatever he says as a lie unless he can prove otherwise.
“There is no doubt about how the president touted the Wikileaks releases,” Schiff claimed. “All of this is in the public domain, and whether it is criminal or not, as I said the other day in committee, it’s deeply unpatriotic, unethical, and corrupt.”
Schiff and other House leaders have demanded Attorney General Barr provide the full, un-redacted Mueller report, and voted to authorize a subpoena for the documents on Wednesday. Naturally, this is a political ploy because it is unlawful for the names of the innocent and other sensitive material to be released until it has been reviewed and properly redacted to protect them and the sensitive information.
Many conservative figures have argued that a judge will likely not issue a subpoena for the documents because it contains sensitive information about individuals who are not going to be indicted on any crime.
Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment