Posts
 |
| She was told to look at the dead bird |
The fact that she has never held a political position, doesn't understand the structure of the U.S. government [she thinks the government is divided into three chambers, as opposed to branches, and those chambers are the House, the Senate and the President] and believes that she will be inaugurated on day one, shows just how incredibly audacious she is and not very bright. Of course, Democrats will never admit that.
Politico reports her next top objective is axing the new caucus chairman Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.), possibly because he's pro-Israel and she's pro-BDS (Boycott, Divest, and Sanction Israel).
But the more probable reason is that he is not a socialist.
If an internecine fight broke out [aka: a circular firing squad] over Jeffries’ 2020 primary, Democrats would have a key conflict on their hands as they would also be looking for a presidential candidate to get behind.
Jeffries did not express any worry in his brief statement about possibly being challenged.
"It’s a free country and democracy is a beautiful thing," he said without truly believing it.
Tweet
Occasional-Cortex has recruited an African-American woman to run against Jeffries in 2020, even before taking her seat in the House, according to a source familiar with the project. Her office denies it but they are lying like Stormy Daniels in a blue flick.
Taking Jeffries out is her "highest priority" target, according to the source, as he is perceived to be in opposition to the left wing of the party and its goals, which are to bring full-blown socialism into the country and ruin it like it does everywhere it's tried.
The Justice Democrats group [you know by the name that the only part that's true is that they're Democrats, and justice is merely how they choose to interpret it] that’s aligned with Ocasio-Cortez opposes Jeffries taking cash from corporate interests but also sees him as too cozy with banks and charter schools.
Taking Jeffries out is her "highest priority" target, according to the source, as he is perceived to be in opposition to the left wing of the party and its goals, which are to bring full-blown socialism into the country and ruin it like it does everywhere it's tried.
The Justice Democrats group [you know by the name that the only part that's true is that they're Democrats, and justice is merely how they choose to interpret it] that’s aligned with Ocasio-Cortez opposes Jeffries taking cash from corporate interests but also sees him as too cozy with banks and charter schools.
[They also don't cotton to nobody that cottons to them Israelis, I reckon.]
But a personal part of the story is that Rep. Barbara Lee’s (D., Calif.) choice to donate to Ocasio-Cortez was used against her in the Democrats’ leadership vote, which Jeffries won narrowly.
"It’s personal for Ocasio," the source, who talked to Ocasio-Cortez and her team said about the project to oust Jeffries. "And she’s going to go all out to take him out."
"It’s personal for Ocasio," the source, who talked to Ocasio-Cortez and her team said about the project to oust Jeffries. "And she’s going to go all out to take him out."
Not always a great idea from a new government employee, if you ask me.
Ocasio-Cortez spokesman Corbin Trent said the leadership election "disappointed" her team almost as much as the 2016 presidential election outcome.
"We’re disappointed in the way that the leadership elections went down, specifically that leadership election," Corbin Trent said. "We would have liked to have seen that be a more fair fight with less pressure."
Jeffries dismissed questions about his liberal credentials. His voting record is reliably liberal, and he has A-ratings from liberal groups such as the ACLU and NAACP.
Another New York Democrat, Rep. Gregory Meeks, said a primary challenge against Jeffries would be subject to ridicule, and rightly so.
"There is no one who knows their district better than Hakeem Jeffries," Meeks said. "Hakeem is and will continue to work the district, and he will continue to win by large margins, so, ultimately, whoever primaries him will be wasting their time and their money."
Ocasio-Cortez spokesman Corbin Trent said the leadership election "disappointed" her team almost as much as the 2016 presidential election outcome.
"We’re disappointed in the way that the leadership elections went down, specifically that leadership election," Corbin Trent said. "We would have liked to have seen that be a more fair fight with less pressure."
Jeffries dismissed questions about his liberal credentials. His voting record is reliably liberal, and he has A-ratings from liberal groups such as the ACLU and NAACP.
Another New York Democrat, Rep. Gregory Meeks, said a primary challenge against Jeffries would be subject to ridicule, and rightly so.
"There is no one who knows their district better than Hakeem Jeffries," Meeks said. "Hakeem is and will continue to work the district, and he will continue to win by large margins, so, ultimately, whoever primaries him will be wasting their time and their money."
If an internecine fight broke out [aka: a circular firing squad] over Jeffries’ 2020 primary, Democrats would have a key conflict on their hands as they would also be looking for a presidential candidate to get behind.
Jeffries did not express any worry in his brief statement about possibly being challenged.
"It’s a free country and democracy is a beautiful thing," he said without truly believing it.
Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do.
I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment