Russia warns US, Iran threatens US

Moscow (AFP) -- Moscow is warning the U.S. Monday that there would be "negative consequences" if President Trump fails to uphold the suicidal Iran nuclear deal put crafted by our former community organizer cum president, Barack Hussein Obama.

Mr. Trump, who sees the 2015 accord as "the worst deal ever" intends to tell Congress next week that Tehran isn't honoring the deal and thus, it needs to go.

Russia isn't happy about that prospect. "Obviously, if one country leaves the deal, especially such a key country as the U.S., then that will have negative consequences," Russian President Vladimir Putin's spokesman said.

"We can only try to predict the nature of these consequences, which we are now doing," said Dmitry Peskov, who added that his boss, Putin, hailed the importance of the existing deal.

President Trump is expected to announce that he's "decertifying" Iran's compliance with the agreement it signed to limit its nuclear program in exchange for the relief of sanctions.

Congress requires the president to certify Iran's compliance with the deal every 90 days, the next being the "ides" of October. Then Congress would have 60 days to decide whether to reimpose sanctions lifted by the deal.

Meanwhile, the lovely Islamic nation of Iran promised Monday to give a "crushing" response if the United States designated its elite Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist group. 

The promise came a week before President Trump said a final decision on how he plans to contain the Islamic Republic [which is not a 'republic' but a theocracy]. 

Of course, this threat comes at a time when Trump will apparently "decertify" the Iran nuclear deal and define the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) by their mission: a terrorist organization.

"We are hopeful that the United States does not make this strategic mistake," Foreign Ministry spokesman Bahram Qasemi said, according to their state news agency IRNA.

"If they do, Iran's reaction would be firm, decisive and crushing and the United States should bear all consequences."

Members of the IRGC and their entities associated with them are already on the U.S. list of foreign terrorist organizations, but the IRGC as a whole [and a 'hole'] is not. 

IRGC commander and head scum crumpet Mohammad Ali Jafari said Sunday "If the news is correct about the stupidity of the American government in considering the Revolutionary Guards a terrorist group, then the Revolutionary Guards will consider the American army to be like Islamic State all around the world."

Nyah nyah, so there.

Jafari warned that additional sanctions would end future dialogue with the US and that the Americans would have to move their regional bases outside the 2,000 km (1250 mile) range of IRGC's missiles.

U.S. sanctions on the IRGC could affect fighting in Iraq and Syria where both Iran and the U.S. support warring parties fighting the Islamic State, another terrorist organization like the IRGC.

France worries that classifying the IRGC correctly [as terrorists] could worsen tensions in the region.

Germany said it feared Trump would decide Iran isn't respecting the nuclear deal, and worries such a measure would exacerbate insecurity in the Middle East. Perhaps Merkel also is scared that her bloated Islamic population would "go all jihad" on Germany.

The U.N. nuclear watchdog's inspectors say repeatedly that Iran is in compliance with the terms of this horrible one-sided deal. But how can they really know that with certainty when they have to pre-announce their inspection visits and are prohibited from inspecting military installations where Iran has 'pinky-sworn' that there's nothing there to see?

Trump rightfully called Iran "a corrupt dictatorship" in his first UN General Assembly speech adding that the nuclear deal was "the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into".

British Prime Minister Theresa May supports the deal; Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposes it. 

Why is it that the nation in the Middle East with a bullseye painted on it opposes the idea of Iran being able to eventually develop nuclear weapons?


But going back to Iran's Qasemi, the U.S. and Israel are just being "Islamophobic" and our accusations are "baseless".

So I guess we shouldn't believe Iran means it when they chant "Death to America!" "Death to Israel!"

We're just being Islamophobic--as if it's irrational.

That ad hominem attack only works with idiots (aka leftists).

Never forget that after the IRGC captured US Navy sailors and made them "take a knee," the bastards made a statue out of that scene.

Like the Jews have said of the Holocaust: "Never again."


Tweet