While Fox News claims that Clinton was "hammered" for saying that FBI Director James Comey "confirmed her statements on her email scandal were "truthful"-with one prominent fact-checker giving the claim four "Pinocchios," the truth is, the liberal media is nevertheless going to be in the bag for her--so "what difference does it make?"
When Wallace cited Comey's statements disputing Clinton's claims that she never sent or received classified emails or any marked 'classified,' Clinton disagreed.
She reminded me of the old and outdated psychological concept of crazy making.
In other words, Hillary appears to be denying our ability to perceive reality and accept facts as facts. But we heard Trey Gowdy question Comey about her statements and we heard Comey's answers confirming that she lied. She didn't tell 'untruths' or 'differently moraled,' as Jasper Fforde wrote. She lied. And anyone who is willing to be honest with him-- or herself can see that.
"That's not what I heard Director Comey say," Hillary answered. "Director Comey said that my answers were truthful and what I've said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails."
The liberal newspaper, The Washington Post, gave Hillary the four "Pinnochios" their worst rating for truthfulness.
The Post wrote that "Clinton is cherry-picking statements by Comey to preserve her narrative about the unusual setup of a private email server. This allows her to skate past the more disturbing findings of the FBI investigation." The pointed out that Hillary was relying on Comey's statement to Congress, "We have no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI."
"While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American people--which was the point of Wallace's question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements," The Post wrote.
But the most damning part of The Post's article was when they concluded with: "And although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified private server. That's the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting."
In spite of the campaign stressing that the emails apparently marked classified, and that Comey said in the hearing the markings weren't properly marked, and the State Department saying the markings should not have been there, the markings were there and the damn emails should not have been sent.
Just because someone is a lousy shot, doesn't mean it wasn't attempted murder.
Hillary even lied about the number of devices she used. She claimed she used one but Comey said otherwise.
Her claim of having turned over all work-related emails was as true as the statement someone else made: "I did not have sex with that woman . . . Miss Lewinsky."
But the worst thing about Hillary Clinton is her inability to take responsibility for her mistakes. She tries to spread blame: "I take classification seriously. I relied on and had every reason to rely on the judgments of the professionals with whom I worked. And so, in retrospect, maybe some people are saying, 'Well, . . . among those 300 people, they made the wrong call. All the time, there was no reason, in my view, to doubt the professionalism and the determination by the people who work every single day on behalf of our country."
Please try no to throw up in your mouth.
So which professionals among the 300 got fired or indicted for allowing poor, Hillary 'What, like with a cloth' Clinton to use a private server and set it up for her?
And who is she going to blame as president when her incompetence comes floating to the top like a Tootsie Roll in a public pool?
Hillary will do anything and say anything to get elected. The trouble is, she's too incompetent to know she's incompetent.