Posts
What do these attacks all have in common:
1. In 2009 Army Major Nadal Hasan shoots and kills 13 soldiers in Ft. Hood.
2. Arid Uka kills 2 airmen in Frankfurt, Germany in 2011.
3. In 2013, the Tsarnaev brothers kill 3 and wound almost 200 spectators at the Boston Marathon.
4. Zaim Farouq Abdul-Malik attacks 4 NYPD officers with a hatchet in 2014.
5. In 2015 the Islamic State kills 130 people, injuring 368 others, using suicide bombers and small arms.
6. Belgium, March 2016, three coordinated bombing occur: two at Brussels Airport in Zaventem, one at Maalbeek metro station in Brussels, killing 32 innocent people and 3 attackers.
The list goes on and on and on.
The commonalities are not the absence of gun control, as Democrats claim--they happen even where gun control is tighter than a liberal and his Che Guevara tee shirt. They happen globally and a wide variety of weapons, such as high explosives, pressure cookers, cars, guns and knives.
Gun control has nothing whatsoever to do with these attacks--it's irrelevant--but liberals can't even wait for the bodies to be removed from the carnage before they call for more gun control.
What is common in all these attacks is, first, what motivates the terrorists: religion and their geopolitical ambitions.
The second common area is the total disrespect for our laws and even hatred of them. Islamic terrorists, and that's who's doing most of the killing, only respect Sharia, or Islamic law. Democracy and our Constitution go against Sharia, or what they believe is 'Allah's word.'
Terrorism is against the law. What makes anyone think that Islamic terrorists will respect gun control laws? What makes anyone think that they will not be able to get their greasy hands on guns?
And guns are no more to blame than pressure cookers, high explosives, knives and cars.
But it seems that House Democrats don't believe fighting terrorism is as important as fighting conservatives for more gun control. They voted only 40 of 188 for the National Defense Authorization Act in May.
The bill would provide tools for our military to fight global jihad and grant authorization and resources for the fight. It would also serve to arm our allies along with the Kurds and Jordanians and train their troops.
It would fund our intelligence resources to help stem the flow of future attacks.
Finally, the bill would fund Operation Inherent Resolve, the war against the Islamic State. But the Democrats see taking guns away from Americans as the solution.
They apparently get their military strategy from the ostrich and believe that their stupid calls, led by liberal Nancy Pelosi, for "no-guns for terrorists" would keep terrorists from getting guns.
They need to get their heads out of the ground, or wherever dark place they have stuck them.
Tweet
The list goes on and on and on.
The commonalities are not the absence of gun control, as Democrats claim--they happen even where gun control is tighter than a liberal and his Che Guevara tee shirt. They happen globally and a wide variety of weapons, such as high explosives, pressure cookers, cars, guns and knives.
Gun control has nothing whatsoever to do with these attacks--it's irrelevant--but liberals can't even wait for the bodies to be removed from the carnage before they call for more gun control.
What is common in all these attacks is, first, what motivates the terrorists: religion and their geopolitical ambitions.
The second common area is the total disrespect for our laws and even hatred of them. Islamic terrorists, and that's who's doing most of the killing, only respect Sharia, or Islamic law. Democracy and our Constitution go against Sharia, or what they believe is 'Allah's word.'
Terrorism is against the law. What makes anyone think that Islamic terrorists will respect gun control laws? What makes anyone think that they will not be able to get their greasy hands on guns?
And guns are no more to blame than pressure cookers, high explosives, knives and cars.
But it seems that House Democrats don't believe fighting terrorism is as important as fighting conservatives for more gun control. They voted only 40 of 188 for the National Defense Authorization Act in May.
The bill would provide tools for our military to fight global jihad and grant authorization and resources for the fight. It would also serve to arm our allies along with the Kurds and Jordanians and train their troops.
It would fund our intelligence resources to help stem the flow of future attacks.
Finally, the bill would fund Operation Inherent Resolve, the war against the Islamic State. But the Democrats see taking guns away from Americans as the solution.
They apparently get their military strategy from the ostrich and believe that their stupid calls, led by liberal Nancy Pelosi, for "no-guns for terrorists" would keep terrorists from getting guns.
They need to get their heads out of the ground, or wherever dark place they have stuck them.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment