Welcome

Welcome to my blog. Here you will find information that is both interesting and useless. You can even see how Steve, my camera, sees the world through my eyes, or get your hands on my latest novel, Jihad Joe at:

http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/119633

Thanks for visiting. Hope you enjoyed the coffee and cake. Sorry we ran out of donuts.


Thursday, December 31, 2015

Sweden: Refugees want to leave haunted house

It's like the Islamic version of the Abbott and Costello flick, "Hold That Ghost." Thirty-five Syrian refugees believe that they are being haunted at the Grannaforsa facility in Sweden.

Hamid Alojaili, a Syrian refugee who currently lives at the facility told the local newspaper Smalandsposten "we are sure" the building is haunted. The building is located in Smaland province, a small Swedish village.

The lights flicker, the plumbing makes curious sounds (perhaps a ghost with a bladder problem) and things go "bump" in the night (or not) Magnus Petersson, a manager at the Swedish Migration Agency said. 

Petersson said 35 of the 58 Syrian refugees in the shelter came to the agency's office in Alvesta, demanding to be relocated. My guess is they didn't like the decor and decided to use this ploy. They other 23 refugees heard no evil.

After the report was made, the 35 who made the report reluctantly returned to the facility where they were not attacked and had better living conditions than they had ever experienced. 

Jinns are imaginary critters that live in the stratosphere and are common in Islamic culture and found in the Koran. Most are evil but there are a few good ones. Hopefully the latter are the ones inhabiting the facility because there are no plans to relocate the "guests" who have been complaining about their accommodations.

Bwahahahhh!

Enjoy the movie and Happy New Year!


Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Obama warns Iran that he might warn Iran

Okay, it's time to stop playing games with Iran. Ever since our anemically weak administration has bent over backwards to accomodate their demands they simply keep making more of the same.

First Iran sank a replica of a U.S. aircraft carrier back in February near the Strait of Hormuz, and conducted missile tests which received a good tongue-lashing from our so-called commander in chief. It even seized a Marshall Islands-flagged cargo ship and released it last May, and before that surrounded a U.S.-flagged cargo ship as it sailed into the strait.

But now they've gone too far and tongue lashings, like make-believe "red line" warnings, only make Iran and others laugh at us.

Iran fired unguided rockets that passed within 1500 yards of the aircraft carrier USS Truman. The USS Bulkeley and FS Provence, a French frigate, were also in the area along with other commercial sea vessels.

According to Cmdr. Kyle Raines, a Central Command spokesman, the Iranians gave us only 23 minutes notice over maritime radio about the exercise. That's even less warning than Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi's radio address warning us of the coming caliphate.

Cmdr. Raines called the Iranian's actions "highly provocative," [but exactly what those actions are going to provoke beyond another Obama verbal assault, is anyone's guess].

"Firing weapons so close to passing coalition ships and commercial traffic within an internationally recognized maritime traffic lane is unsafe, unprofessional and inconsistent with international maritime law," Raines said, causing the Iranian Supreme Leader to practically wet himself from laughter, knowing full well that we have complained before and Obama did nothing but tongue lash.

A U.S. military official told The Hill that the Iranian ships approached the USS Truman and some of the other vessels prior to making the live-fire announcement and warning them to stay clear. Soon thereafter, the rockets were launched.

Aircraft carriers are not made to turn on a dime--they need miles to turn--and the warning given by Iran was totally provocative and clearly done to intimidate the United States.

I am not in any way proposing military action based on the events in the Straits of Hormuz, but I believe that we must make it abundantly clear that this is the last time Iran will try to intimidate us. The next time will be met with sanctions; any other occurrence will be met with shock and awe.

The only problem is, we don't have a president, we have a community organizer who appeases Islamic nations and goes against our closest allies, especially Israel. 

His departure from the White House cannot come soon enough, but I hope it comes in time.

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Explosion of condoms, one dead

If you're going to blow up a condom vending machine, you'd better know what you're doing. 

A 29-year-old German man, whose recent use of a condom may have failed and he got his partner pregnant, or caught AIDS or something, tried to blow up a condom vending machine. But the machine blew up him, it appears.

The man was brought to the hospital by two other men who initially said the victim fell down some stairs, but the metal fragments embedded in his noggin apparently didn't jive and the hospital staff called the police.

The victim's friends admitted they had tried to blow up the machine and the man was injured by a fragmentation when he failed to shut the car door in time and the metal hit him in the head.


He died at hospital of his injuries.

The police found condom packets and money lying on the ground, while sad and disappointed teens looked on or texted. 






Hostages win, taxpayers lose again

Why is it not surprising that the U.S. taxpayer will be footing the bill Iran was supposed to pay for the embassy personnel taken hostage in the 1979 Islamic Revolution?

It isn't surprising because this administration would go so far as to kiss the Ayatollah's butt in Macy's window to appease him.

A fund known as the "United States Victims of State Sponsors of Terrorism Fund" (better known as "Americans Will Handle the Heavy Lifting for you, Iran Fund") with over $1 billion of taxpayer money set aside, was an added boner to the omnibus bill penned by Congress and signed into law by so-called President Barack Hussein Obama on December 28th.

What the hell, it isn't their money.

The 52 Americans that were held in captivity by Iran can get up to $4.4 million each, and each spouse and child of the victims get another $600,000 each. It looks like Iran lucked out with the U.S. picking up the tab.

The victims have been seeking numeration for being held but were prevented from suing Iran because the 1981 Algiers Accords, which secured their release. The Algiers Accords had a provision barring litigation by the hostages from suing the Iranian government.

The hostages were taken from the U.S. embassy in Tehran when hundreds of student protesters stormed the complex. A few months later, former failed President Jimmy Carter authorized Operation Eagle Claw, a rescue attempt that failed as miserably as his presidency. Thus, the hostages were held for 444 days and after lengthy negotiations, were released on President Ronald Reagan's inauguration in January 1981.

As usual, Obama lets Iran win while American taxpayers continue to lose.


Franklin Graham has had enough

Franklin Graham said Tuesday that he is leaving the Grand Old Party due to the GOP-led spending bill passed last week [by a Congress dominated by Republican cowards]. He described the bill as "wasteful" and compared the funding of Planned Parenthood (PP) to Nazi concentration camps.

As much as I hate the Nazis, I think comparing PP to them gives the Nazis a bad name.

"Shame on the Republicans and the Democrats for passing such a wasteful spending bill last week," the evangelist said. "And to top it off, funding Planned Parenthood." 

Graham said that the nonchalant way PP talked about selling baby parts from aborted fetuses reminds him of Joseph Mengele and the Nazi concentration camps. "That should've been all that was needed to turn off the faucet for their funding," he said. "Nothing was done to trim this 2,000 page, $1.1 trillion budget."

Mr. Graham said he no longer has hope for either political party and wrote "Unless more godly men and women get in this process and change this wicked system, our country is in for trouble."

Although Graham supported Donald Trump in his White House bid, he has now lost faith in the political system, and that might also mean that he's lost faith in Trump as well.



Malaysia refuses Israel to show its flag or play its anthem in sailing competition

When Muslims comprise over 50% of a country's population they tend to have final say in all matters political. That is, they tend to dominate all other religions and show complete contempt for Israel and the Jews as proscribed in the Koran and called for by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Muslims who take the Koran at face value don't like Christians very much, or any other religion including Islam that isn't in accordance with their version of the religion of peace.

Malaysia's Muslim population is over 61% followed by Buddhist at 19.8%, Christian 9.2%, Hindu 6.3% and the rest are either traditional Chinese or unspecified. It's obvious which religion dominates that country.

Malaysia issued a special visa forbidding Israeli athletes from wearing the Israeli flag in a sailing competition, nor are they permitted to have the Israeli National Anthem played if they were to win the gold medal.

Israel's sailing federation is threatening legal action, but I suspect that with political correctness, nothing will come of a lawsuit that has Allah on its side.

The visa specifications caused two Israeli windsurfers along with their coach to withdraw from the International Sailing Federation's youth championships in protest. Amir Gill, the Israel Sailing Association Chairman, said he and the windsurfers were offered the conditional visas to compete this past Sunday, but the terms were unacceptable to them.

And who can blame them?

Malaysian anti-Zionist, anti-Semitic Muslims says it decided on the conditional visas "after following existing diplomatic policy, the Malay Mail Online reports. 

The organizers of the event said it will investigate and seek clarification from Malaysian officials. First they need to finish their investigation of Malaysian Airlines and the suicidal Muslim Captain.

But no need to bother; I can clarify the situation.


The Koran's directive is to make the Christians and Jews "feel themselves subdued" (9:29). The Koran also refers to Jews as "prophet killers" (2:61; 2:87; 2:91; 3:181; 3:183; 4:155; and 5:70). This has become one of the main devices for Islamic anti-Semitism.

Imam Muhammad Hussein Ya'qoub of Egypt summed up the Islamic argument for anti-Semitism in a TV sermon in 2009:
"If the Jews left Palestine to us, would we start loving them? Of course not. We will never love them. Absolutely not. The Jews are infidels--not because I say so, and not because they are killing Muslims, but because Allah said: "The Jews say that Uzair is the son of Allah." These are the words out of their mouths. They imitate the sayings of the disbelievers before. May Allah fight them. How deluded they are, [9:30] It is Allah who said that they are infidels." 
The opening prayer in mosques is "Surat Al-Fatihah" is said at least 17 times a day. It praises Allah and goes on to say: "Guide us in the Straight Way. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).

The words in parentheses are not mine, they are in the Saudi Arabia edition (Publisher Darussalam). 

The Koran is very clear about how Allah feels about the rest of the world's people, and it's the Muslim Brotherhood that clarifies this by calling for jihad against "the Muslim's real enemies, not only Israel but also the United States. Waging jihad against both of these infidels is a commandment of Allah that cannot be disregarded."--Muslim Brotherhood Supreme Guide Muhammed Badi, Sept. 2010.

The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) Charter calls for the murder of Jews, the "obliteration" of Israel which will replace it with an Islamic theocracy. Thus, one can see that Hamas is a wing of the MB.

The MB supports Hezbollah in its war against the Jews. The MB leader Mahdi Akef said that he was "prepared to send 10,000 jihad fighters immediately to fight at the side of Hezbollah" during Hezbollah's war against Israel in 2006.

So it isn't a mere technicality or misunderstanding about the Israel sailing team. It's a clear and worldwide Islamically-inspired hatred of the Jews and only slightly less so for Christians and other religions. 

Of course, atheists, lesbians and gays are also deeply hated and are to be killed.

But to believe that Israel will win a lawsuit against Malaysia is to discount the existence of the lengths we go to appease Islam. I doubt it will ever happen.


Monday, December 28, 2015

FDNY test: 7th time's a charm

If I'm going to need brain surgery, and many who read my blog believe I do, I'm going to want a neurological surgeon who was a "straight A" student and proficient in his field.

If my house is on fire and my cat (whose name is Barack Obama) needs to be rescued from the blaze, I want a firefighter who can break down the door and do whatever is physically necessary to rescue her. 

Just kidding, I don't have a cat.

I don't want someone who has failed the fire department test 6 times and got a "free pass" on the 7th to arrive at the scene and try saving me or my loved ones if I could chose someone stronger who passed the test.

I'm talking about a woman named Wendy Tapia. She was allowed to conditionally graduate from the Fire Academy (of the FDNY) on May 17, 2013, in spite of her failing the running test. She blamed her last failure on a foot injury (or boo-boo).

Now she's to take her seventh go at the exam but critics are saying that she's going to pass because the fix is in.

She had been sworn in, the FDNY gave her the 5 shots to run a mile and a half in 12 minutes or less, but she failed it and quit the test. She has not worked an actual tour of duty, but political correctness will see to it that she passes on this go around.

FDNY test requirements aren't easy, but neither is battling a fire.

Ms. Tapia is now 34 and works as a medical technician and among a group that was promoted to probationary firefighter and starts the 18-week training on Monday. This comes at a time when the FDNY has reduced its standards for the test, much like the Democrats have done for the "do-nothing" Hillary Clinton.

New York City had to shell out $98 million to settle a federal lawsuit charging bias against minority applicants, and the Big Apple doesn't want to go through a gender-discrimination suit at this point. They have enough problems with their socialist mayor DiBlasio.
NYPD rank and file refuse to look at DiBlasio
while giving speech

There are only 49 female firefighters out of the 10,500-members on the force.

After her boo-boo in 2013, United Women Firefighters, a group comprised of retired FDNY women, convinced then-Commissioner Sal Cassano to allow Tapia to graduate and pass the test at a later time. 

According to the New York Post, Lt. Elizabeth Osgood, a female firefighter, objected to Tapia being given special treatment. Of course, this caused Osgood from being promoted for months. And Capt. Paul Mannix, president of Merit Matters, an anti-quota group, was told to keep his mouth shut about Tapia's situation.

A reporter from the New York Post called a week ago but she hung up on him.

One can only hope that Tapia passes the test, gets assigned, and never fails to save a life due to her physical limitations.


Obama cat-fights Senate over his love of Iran

You've probably heard the term 'creeping sharia.' It's how Islam tries to demand non-Islamic governments to give in to their Sharia laws by starting off asking for something insignificant on the surface, like allowing imams to dispense with divorce proceedings, etc., then having it grow to the point where it supersedes American law. 

Now we have 'creeping appeasement' with Iran. They want us to bend over backwards to go beyond the boundaries of the nuclear deal we made with them and give in to their demands. 

Kerry is asking Iran how far backwards must he bend, and if he can place a cushion behind him to ease the fall in case he topples over on his hair plugs. 

The deal is supposed to gradually ease economic sanctions we placed on Iran because they're a terrorist state and are supporting terrorism all over the globe. Now Kerry,  Obama's "Boy Friday," is telling Iran's Foreign Minister that although Congress has passed legislation that tightens restrictions on coming to the USA on those people who in the last 5 years have traveled to Iran, Iraq, Syria and Sudan, he believes the president can waive these restrictions for Iran.

It isn't like we have a separation of power within the United States government anymore. 

Check out the video on FoxNews.com and hear it for yourself. It's amazing what this administration is getting away with as Democrats move further and further to the left.

But U.S. lawmakers, some Democrats included, agree that it is necessary for us to retain the ability to quickly re-trigger those sanctions if [read 'when'] Iran cheats; to be able to do so would require the extension of the sanctions law.


Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) and Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill) introduced the Iran Sanctions Relief Oversight Act of 2015. Menendez warned president Obama that Iran "will continue to test the limits of international order."

Of course they will test us. It's how the Middle East mentality works--if they smell weakness (like that feline odor emanating from Obama's body) they continue with their attack. 

The worst part of this situation is that Obama isn't as stupid as he appears to be--he knows what's going on and he doesn't care.




Sunday, December 27, 2015

United for free: U.S. moves to cut UN dues

It seems that nothing this administration does is ever quite out in the open where the sunlight can make it fresh and clean. 

We are now in a covert struggle with some of the poorer nations over the UN tab and how much the U.S. is willing to pick up over the next three years, according to FoxNews.com. The biggest part of the cost is the expenses paid out for peacekeeping activities.

Dag Hammarskjold, the second UN secretary general once said that the UN "was created not to lead mankind to heaven but to save humanity from hell." He was talking about the kind of hell mankind created in Hitler's extermination camps and the creation of the atom bomb.

In a recent article by The Guardian, it says: "The United Nations has saved millions of lives, and boosted health and education across the world. But it is bloated, undemocratic--and very expensive." 

Yes, it's so expensive that in its 70 years has spent over $500 billion. And while it goes to war to promote peace, it has been a bystander through genocide, The Guardian correctly points out.

So whether the Obama administration is being sneaky in deciding if we're going to pay the tab for other nations, the more important question is: do we need the United Nations anymore?

The UN is seen by the poorer nations as an organization dominated by the wealthier countries like the U.S. and much of the West.

And accounting for inflation, the cost of operations of the UN is 40 times higher than it was in the 1950s. Now the poor nations are hoping the U.S. can decrease the UN's "scale of assessments"--a dues system that favors poor nations and even less poorer nations that pay less than their 'fair share' as Obama would frame it. They want the U.S. and other rich nations to pay the difference of what they're not paying.

So the U.S. will continue to pay billions more than anyone else and other rich nations will have additional costs, but not as much as we will have. The Obama administration does not reveal our costs to the public, but it has increased significantly. Our last official contribution amount was in 2010 and was about $7.6 billion, but likely much higher than revealed.

In the process of increasing our costs to the UN, the plan is to quietly reduce the cost to others.

Heck, it isn't Obama's money anyway, right?


Islamic State taunts Islamophilia POTUS

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi released a new 24-minute audio message in which he says that the United States is afraid to fight Islamic State "caliphate." He claims our "hearts are full of fear from the mujahedeen." 

"America and its allies dream of destroying the caliphate through their proxies and henchmen, and whenever an alliance of theirs fails or a tail is cut, they hasten to establish another, until they recently declared the Salouli (Saudi) alliance that was falsely called Islamic," the PhD in Islamic studies claimed. 

But what does he know about Islam?

Al-Baghdadi is like the kid in the school yard who grabs his crotch, bounces his shoulders, bravado style, and taunts the gang of nerds to come and fight him and his gang. He reminds me of the Black Knight from Monty Python's The Holy Grail. Only a lot more dangerous.

But the only nerd here is Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama believes that certain rules of war apply when fighting these crazy terrorists. The rules of engagement have limited the U.S. coalition forces so drastically that it's practically impossible to destroy ISIS. Obama even had us drop flyers on ISIS oil trucks so the drivers could make a safe exit before we blew up the trucks that were headed for Assad's Syrian forces.

If we relaxed the rules of engagement, we could destroy these asshats in a few months at most, I believe.

Even so, ISIS has been getting hit hard from the Saudi-led Islamic military coalition fighting in the Middle East and with U.S.-backed Syrian rebels fighting a ground offensive that has captured the strategic Tishrin Dam on the Euphrates River. These ground forces are about to draw out ISIS from Ramadi, another strategic foothold for the scumcrumpet terrorists.

Although airstrikes cannot win a war, the U.S.-led coalition along with Syria and Russia have wiped out Syrian oil facilities and killed several ISIS leaders in the past few weeks.

Ever the warm-hearted anti-Semitic Sunni Muslim, al-Baghdadi said that if the Saudi-led alliance was truly Islamic, then it would fight the Syrian army and its Russian "masters," as well as Shiites and Jews.

This is Islam in its purest form, its clearly anti-Semitic, intolerant
of all-else form, that al-Baghdadi spouts and translates into the hatred of Israel and love of Hamas generally found in Muslim communities.


"We promise you, God willing, that whoever participates in the war against the Islamic State will pay the price dearly," al-Baghdadi bragged.

It's time to send him and his murderers away for good.





Saturday, December 26, 2015

Another cop awakens BLM

A Chicago police officer (whose melanin quantity has not been disclosed) shot and killed a man and woman while responding to a domestic disturbance call on Saturday. The location of the scene was on the city's West Side.

One victim, Quintonio Legrier, 19, was pronounced deat at 4:51 a.m. and Bettie Jones, 55, and a neighbor of Legrier and a mother of 5, died at 5:14 a.m. at another hospital.

Autopsies are awaiting scheduling, the ME's spokesperson Becky Schlikerman said.

The shootings occurred around 4:25 a.m. when police responded to the call. They "were confronted by a combative subject," the Chicago Police Department said in a statement.

Legrier's mother, Janet Cooksey, told the Chicago Tribune that her son studied engineering at Northern Illinois State and that he "was going somewhere." She revealed that her son had mental issues and said that her son "didn't have a gun. He had a bat."
Schumer's proposed ban on carpenters

So that made it wrong to shoot him because bats aren't guns.

Well, according to a Breitbart.com report, in 2011 "there was 323 murders committed with a rifle but 496 murders committed with hammers and clubs."

The truth is, we weren't there to see what really happened but it seems that our new "default" position is to blame the cops and not the attackers. In fact, the Associated Press pressed the Chicago PD for more information but received no response. It is unclear if either Legrier or Jones were armed or if there is any video of the incident.

Ms. Cooksey said she wants Mayor Rahm Emanuel to provide her with a personal apology, but she may need to take a number and get in line. "Are we gonna get protected or is the police just gonna keep taking lives?" Cooksey said. "I mean, whose gonna answer these questions?" she asked.

Right now the Chicago PD is under a federal civil rights investigation regarding the video that was recently released showing a melanin challenged officer, Jason Van Dyke, shooting a 17-year-old black person, Laquan McDonald, 16 times in 2014. The video seems very damning but let's not have a knee-jerk reaction to every case that comes into the public view. I'm not saying the police are innocent in this case, but I am not willing to condemn the people who protect us ever day.

I hope this terrible incident doesn't lead to more violence and public unrest and destruction of property. That would be the fault of George Soros.


BREAKING: Ground forces approaching Ramadi

The Iraq military on the ground is closing in on the ISIS compound in Ramadi, a city merely 60 miles from Baghdad and considered to be extremely strategic for the coalition forces. The compound had been a government structure but has been taken over by the hardcore Muslims and the only area still under Islamic State control.

There are about 100 Koran-clutching terrorists as the Iraqi forces move within a mile of their position and the going is slow in spite of the larger size coalition forces. The land is filled with landmines and IED, and the dwellings they've come across are often booby-trapped.

"Our preparations to attack the government compound are still on and we are approaching step-by-step," Brig. Gen. Ahmed al-Bilawi said. He is the commander of the Anbar province emergency police division and has not received public opposition from any Iraqi "Black Lives Matter" protesters.

The U.S. is leading the airstrike campaign as the Iraqis began a new push at the beginning of the week.

On another happy note, U.S.-backed rebels in Syria comprised of a coalition of Syrian Kurdish, as well as Arabs and Christians, captured a major dam on the Euphrates River north of Islamic State's position.

The coalition is called the Syria Democratic Forces (SDF), but I doubt that any American Democrat is among the fighters. The group seized the Tishrin Dam today which will cut off supply lines between ISIS strongholds in northern Syria.

Unlike the orders given by the Obama administration, the SDF did not forewarn the scumcrumpets of ISIS that they were coming to take the dam from them, like Obama warned the ISIS oil truck drivers before we blew up their vehicles as they were on their way to juice up Assad.

The dam supplies most of northern Syria with electricity which ISIS doesn't really need as they are still living in the Seventh Century.

The SDF is dominated by Kurdish militia (aka People's Protection Units, aka YPG), in its fight against ISIS but we have yet to supply them directly with arms.


Syrian refugees and the limited job market

According to the website Muslim Statistics, about 65% of Syrian refugees entering Germany will have a tougher time than non-refugees in academic fields such as law and medicine. This is due in large part to the fact that they are functionally illiterate. 

Just try getting through med school or law school without being able to read or write. It's really tough.

So if Angela Merkel was hoping the influx of Syrians would enhance the sciences, develop cures for shingles, or create a stronger economy, she was mistaken.

Of course, the same problem exists in all countries in Europe that have been kind enough to take in Syrian "refugees," but isn't it odd that about 70% of these folks are men?

The Obama abomination has agreed to take in 10,000 refugees per year and ISIS has agreed to plant a few of its members among them. This should not be a cause for alarm based on the statistical probability of you actually being personally involved as part of the carnage that may occur.

But even if there isn't an ISIS attack created by the refugee situation, you can bet your grandchildren's future that over 50% of them will receive some form of welfare assistance.

I sincerely hope I'm wrong, but that's the way it's beginning to look in the EU.


Germany's welfare guests refuse to leave

It isn't working out so well for Germany and the Muslim situation. But the problem isn't only about the new refugee situation, it also stems from their 'guest worker' program.
Syrian refugees: note all the women and children

When the Turks came to Germany on 'guest worker visas' they were there to provide cheap labor and then leave. Instead, they went on welfare; at least 80% of them did. 

Muslims call such payments from any state they inhabit 'jizya,' or tax levied by a Muslim state on certain non-Muslim people residing in Muslim lands. It is religiously required.

But you're probably wondering why they would think this way, after all, Germany isn't a "Muslim state."

The goal of Islam is to spread the religion throughout the world until every person worships only Allah. Therefore, Islam considers the entire planet to be theirs. Anywhere that Muslims go, you can see how they move in the direction of domination of the people living there prior to the 'immigration jihad.'  This is precisely what is happening in Germany and has already been going on in France, Sweden, the Netherlands, and coming soon to a neighborhood near you.

So the welfare payments in their way of thinking, is rightfully theirs.

If you consider the implications of welfare jizya, you can imagine what we can expect in the United States after the Syrian refugees settle in and feel the same sense of 'ummah' the Turks in Germany feel.


Friday, December 25, 2015

UK knows the Muslim bros

Europe, particularly the UK, seems to be waking up, finally. According to FoxNews.com, the UK is accusing the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) of "being sympathetic to terrorists and a risk to British national security." Ya think?

Of course, this is in sharp contrast to the Obama administration who has the MB to the White House for tea, crumpets and strategy talks. Some say the U.S. needs to wake up to the threat of the MB, but I am fairly certain they know exactly with whom they are dealing.

And that is the real scary part.

An internal review of the MB was ordered by Prime Minister David Cameron. The findings of the report, according to Nile Gardiner, director of the Heritage Foundation's Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom are "a damning indictment of the Muslim Brotherhood, and it's a very realistic assessment of the nature of the Brotherhood itself." He went on to tell FoxNews.com "The British government has taken a far more serious approach compared to the Obama administration's."

While some of the report is classified, some have been ordered by Cameron to be made public.

What the findings basically show is that the MB puts on a "front" by renouncing violence, but in reality they have defended Hamas' terrorist attacks on Israelis and have even justified attacks against coalition forces in the U.S. and Afghanistan.

But like the "crazy-making" parents of a schizophrenic child, the MB leaders have made claims that the 9-11 attacks were fabricated by the United States government in order to justify our attacks on Muslim countries. Alex Jones would be proud of them, I suspect.

The report says that even though the MB prefers non-violent strategies on the grounds of expediency, "they are prepared to countenance violence--including, from time to time, terrorism--where gradualism is ineffective."

Egypt declared the MB to be a terrorist organization in December 2013. Obama, not so much.

While the West praised the Arab Spring revolutions in Egypt and beyond, when Morsi was overthrown, they were embarrassed. Thus, after this recent report, Cameron, chucking his indefatigable PC wisdom finally had enough. He told MPs that association with the MB "should be considered as a possible indicator of extremism."

Okay, so he didn't quite "chuck" his PC, but he at least made an attempt. He said the U.K. would refuse visas to those associated with the MB who have made "extremist" comments [like quoting the Koran, Mr. Cameron?].

Obama, on the other hand, pretends to be neutral. In January 2015 the State Department met with the MB's own Egyptian Freedom and Justice Party. You know, the guys who'd cut the hand off a thief or give 100 lashes to a woman whose body isn't in a bag.

Even the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper described the MB as "mostly secular." He gives "national intelligence" a whole new meaning. 

The MB is as Islamically orthodox as you can get without blowing yourself up.

In many Muslim countries one is not allowed to say Merry Christmas.

Merry Christmas.



Thursday, December 24, 2015

Shopping mall shooting leaves one dead

With the last-minute rush to buy that one gift you forgot, and the crowds window shopping with looks of glee on their faces, then running in every direction to get away from a mall shooter, you can tell that it's beginning to look a lot like Christmas.

FoxNews. com reported that an armed man in the people-stuffed Northlake Mall in Charlotte, NC, was confronted by off-duty officers and was shot and pronounced dead on scene. The police believe it began as a kerfuffle between two groups of people when the officers intervened. At least three people were rushed to nearby hospitals.

As store employee at Aldo inside the mall said she heard five or six shots and immediately closed the door to the store and went to the back room. After a short time, mall security came and told people to evacuate.

Due to the massive crowd leaving the mall to get into their vehicles, the parking lot looked a lot like Manhattan's Fifth Avenue during rush hour. It moved like the petal of the iris opening for the Buddha.

The cause of the kerfuffle is still unknown, but we hope it had nothing to do with any religious requirements imposed upon the shooter, if you know what I mean.

But seriously, Merry Christmas. Please be safe.


Hillary Clinton #NotMiAbuela--gracias a Dios

"Hola, senora. Que pasa?"
Liberals can't help it. They have to look at people in racial, gender or religious affiliation terms and play to that in order to win them over. Often it works, but this time it backfired.

Hillary Clinton's campaign tried to sway Latino voters with her latest campaign post. The campaign's "7 ways Hillary Clinton is just like your abuela" [Spanish for 'grandmother') plays up to the ethnic stereotypes Democrats use to demonize Republicans, but all it did this time was piss off many people on social media.

The campaign's attempt to trick Latino voters came the same day that Hillary's daughter, Chelsea, announced she was pregnant with Clinton's second grandchild. But this feeble attempt was immediately ridiculed by online users as a poor stereotype with basic Spanish vocabulary and Hillary posing with singer Marc Anthony to show how cool she is [not].

The campaign post said: "It's no secret that Hillary is loving her role as grandma. And she was thrilled to learn that next summer, her granddaughter Charlotte will have a sibling to play with."

It is also no secret (unless you only get your news from MSNBC) that Hillary broke the law with her private email server which accepted Top Secret correspondence, and allowed 4 men to die in Benghazi due to her incompetence. 

But that isn't what my post is all about.

The campaign then used the word respeto many times (respect in Spanish) and goes on to say about Donald Trump that she has one word for him: "Basta! Enough!" Then it ends with "Everybody loves abuela--even this guy," showing the Scandal Queen with Anthony.

Twitter users began expressing their disgust with the hastags #NotMiAbuela or #NotMyAbuela.

Hillary did the same "abuela" move two months ago in another post entitled: "6 cosas que no sabias sobre Hillary Clinton."

Of course this means: "6 reasons you should not for Hillary Clinton sober."



Tuesday, December 22, 2015

Kerry's verbal calisthenics: takes Iran's side over Congress

Iran keeps doing whatever it wants to do with its missile tests, support of terrorism, and uranium shenanigans. It says whatever it wants to say about death to America and Israel. 

And John-the-Gigolo-Kerry writes to Javad Zarif, Iran's Foreign Minister, suggesting that the Obama administration might be able to forget about the little detail Congress passed on visa restrictions and allow Iran to skate around it. 

"Congress, Schmongress," Kerry might have said. "Who needs 'em?"

After all, how is Valerie Jarrett going to be able to entertain her old friends if they can't come to the US from the country of her youth?

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) wasn't too thrilled by Kerry's suggestion. "Instead of bending over backwards to try to placate the Iranian regime, the White House needs to be holding it accountable for its recent missile tests, its continued support of terrorism, and its wrongful imprisonment of Americans," he told FoxNews.com.

I just got a picture of Kerry bending over backwards and it made my eyes throw up.

The United States has finally tightened its security requirements for the visa waiver program. There are 38 countries whose citizens can come to the U.S. without visas, but now if they've traveled to Iran, Iraq, Sudan and Syria within the past five years, they must get a visa to enter the U.S.

It kind of keeps the jihad influx rate lower when we tighten things up like that. It might even prevent acts of terrorism like in San Bernadino from happening. 

But Iranian jihadists complained the changes violate the terms of the nuclear agreement, which says that we and other world powers will refrain from any policy that adversely affects normal trade and economic relations with Iran [until they destroy us, at which point, it won't matter].

Kerry responded to Zarif in  an excessively emetic letter, suggesting that maybe the rules can be overlooked.

I think Lt. Col. Ralph Peters was making reference to more than just one person when he called Obama that feline word suggesting a lack of backbone and strength.

"I am also confident that the recent changes in visa requirements passed in Congress, which the Administration has the authority to waive, will not in any way prevent us from meeting our [nuclear deal] commitments, and that we will implement them so as no to interfere with legitimate business interests of Iran," the pussy Kerry said.

So Kerry was telling Zarif that we will give in to Iran's demands: "To this end, we have a number of potential tools available to us, including multiple ten-year business visas, programs for expediting business visas, and the waiver authority provided under the new legislation," he wrote.

The legislation Kerry was referring to includes a provision that would allow our Homeland Security (which has become an oxymoron under our current administration) to waive the requirements if the secretary deems that this "is in the law enforcement or national security interests of the United States."

On the contrary, the entire purpose for the legislation is for the security of the homeland. Duh.

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) worried that Kerry was proposing a "blanket" waiver to kiss up to Iran, stating that it isn't Congress' intent "Contrary to what the Secretary of State seems to be saying to Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarid, it was not and has never been Congress' intent to allow the Administration to grant a blanket waiver to travelers from Iran in order to facilitate the implementation of the Iran deal."
"Good job, Barry. Just like I told you to do"

He said the legislation was to bolster security and "keep the American people safe from terrorism and from foreign travelers who potentially pose a threat to our homeland."

If left to their own devices, this Administration would be playing tickle-slap with the Ayatollah and his terrorist crew and the country would pay the price.

But Valerie Jarrett would still be our president.


Monday, December 21, 2015

Obama goes after the Donald

President [but not for long] Obama accused Donald Trump of using the administration's messed up economy and job growth to scare and frustrate those of us who already were and still are. Mustering more emotion on this topic than all the emotion he showed on San Bernadino, Paris, ISIS and all Islamic terrorist attacks, he gave the most direct criticism so far, to the Donald.

This can only mean one thing: the Democrats are worried.

Mr. Obama spoke on NPR radio, the taxpayer-funded radio station that overtly supports the Democratic party, but although that is illegal, nothing will be done about it because Congress lost it's testicular fortitude long ago.

And the media wonders why Trump is doing so well?

The president spoke on NPR as he began his highly expensive and lavish Hawaiian vacation. I believe the entire family flew on the same aircraft this time and will boast about how that is saving the environment, unlike the Paris agreement designed to save the world in spite of emitting about 300,000 tons of CO2, according to Wired.com

Obama said "particularly blue-collar men have had a lot of trouble in this new economy, where they are no longer getting the same bargain that they got when they were going to a factory and able to support their families on a single paycheck, you combine those things and it means that there is going to be potential anger, frustration, fear.

"Some of it justified but just misdirected," said the man who has never taken the blame for his incompetence as president. "I think somebody like Mr. Trump is taking advantage of that. That's what he's exploiting during the course of his campaign."

Much like Jonathan Gruber said he was exploiting the stupidity of the American voter when it came to Obamacare.

When asked to expand on his claims and talk about the concerns of those who believe Obama is trying to make unwelcome changes, the Divider in Chief got into a contentious exchange with Steve Inskeep of NPR that discussed the issue of .  .  .  wait for it .  .  .  race!

Big surprise.

This provided Obama with a perfect opportunity where he suggested there are "certain circumstance around being the first African-American president that might not have confronted a previous president," then pointing out about "specific strains in the Republican Party that suggest that somehow I'm different, I'm Muslim, I'm disloyal to the country, etc., which unfortunately is pretty far out there and gets some traction in certain pockets of the Republican Party." 

He quickly added: "But that's not to suggest that everybody who objects to my policies may not have perfectly good reasons for it."

It's good to know that we are allowed to disagree with him without being labelled a racist. 

He then pretended that the government isn't telling us about "the work we've been doing for more than a year now to defeat ISIL," as he then bragged about the 9,000 airstrikes we've carried out in over a year. That's like a piddle in the pool: 9,000 is nothing, especially when the rules of engagement are so strict. Over 75% of the sorties return with their ordnance load.

I may or may not vote for Donald Trump, but I certainly enjoy his lack of self-censorship. He says what he's thinking--not always the smart thing to do, but at least we know where he stands.

Some of his ideas are ludicrous, like not allowing Muslims into the country. It's not only unfeasible, it's unconstitutional. 

You can't complain about Obama circumventing the Constitution and be okay with Donald Trump wanting to do the same thing. But at least he's changed his tune on that somewhat.

Tremendous.


Hillary attacks Donald who attacks back better

Hillary Clinton said of the GOP front runner, Donald J. Trump, that he was "becoming ISIS's best recruiter." She said that ISIS "is going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists."

She carefully avoided using the term "radical Muslims" even though jihad is an Islamic term. But worse, there is no actual evidence that her claim is true. None.

And it's pretty obvious that ISIS will use anything it can to recruit Muslim jihadists. They use our freedom and democracy to recruit, our Constitution versus their Sharia law, to recruit, anything that goes against their Islamic ideology. I wouldn't be surprised if they wouldn't use Hillary's acceptance of same sex marriage as a recruitment tool.

Trump told Matt Lauer of the "Today Show" that he wants Clinton to apologize for making that statement. Hillary has as much chance of giving Donald an actual apology as Bernie Sanders has of not giving Hillary one. 

"Whether it was Whitewater or the email scandal, she always lies. And now to be saying that we're just right in the perfect spot [to defeat ISIS]," he said, referring to another debate statement she made, "I don't think that's a lie, I think she really doesn't know what she's doing." He went on to say, "She's been a mess no matter where she's been. She has created a mess--look at her record as Secretary of State."

Does Hillary Clinton have a bad relationship with the truth? I discuss it here in part, but there's plenty of evidence that concurs with Trump's assessment (although his statements are also occasionally murky regarding the facts).

Hillary's spokesliar, Jennifer Palmieri struggled with a few verbal contortions in a feeble attempt to defend her boss, as she spoke to ABC's George Stephanopoulos. It was pathetic.

"Um, the uh, uh, you know, Donald Trump, I think, was talking, uh, you know, what Secretary Clinton was saying last night is that one of the many dangerous things about Donald Trump is that, uh, his hot rhetoric, saying we shouldn't allow Muslim refugees into the country is being used, and this is something that [an international group] has who monitors social media and uh, on ISIS has said--" Palmieri babbled as Stephanopoulos interrupted.
"But there have been no videos," he said. 
"Well, what they have said is that they are using him--he is being used in social media by ISIS as propaganda," Palmieri stammered. "She didn't have a particular video in mind, but he's being used in social media, and, uh, you know what they haven't found is the video Mr. Trump keeps talking about, this alleged mystery video of thousands of people in Jersey cheering the collapse of the World Trade Center. But it is true he is being used in social media by, um, ISIS, to, to help recruit and propaganda." 
"But to be clear, you don't have a video, as she said," Stephanopoulos asked.
"She's not referring to a specific video. But he is being used in social media by ISIS as propaganda." 
But she clearly said that Trump appears on videos that are being used by ISIS to recruit jihadists. 

Sorry, that's what Clinton said. Changing the argument to "Well Trump said there are videos with Muslims dancing in the streets in Jersey when the World Trade Center came down," [my paraphrase] is using a post hoc ergo propter hoc argument or perhaps a false analogy. It doesn't change the fact that Hillary is a liar who lies even when she yells "Good morning," to Bill in the next room. 

If you want to see more about Hillary Clinton's short list of lies, Politifact can get you started. However, the site only discusses the more recent lies and doesn't go into the Benghazi scandal, the email scandal that was generated by the Benghazi scandal, and Whitewater. 

This is an excellent video by Rush Limbaugh that clearly explains what Whitewater was all about. 

Hillary should not be in public office, she should be in prison. The notion that she actually could be our next POTUS is frightening.

Hillary has never met a scandal she didn't lie about and never gave an apology she should have given.



Sunday, December 20, 2015

Congress back Obama 100% on immigration priorities

It is becoming increasingly clear why so many conservatives and even some Democrats are favoring Donald Trump over all the other candidates in the 2016 presidential election. You might not like everything the Donald says, but at least he says what's on his mind uncensored.

The Washington Free Beacon reported that at least 3 million foreign nationals were granted work permits and green cards in 2013, mostly from Mexico, India and China. Although last year's numbers haven't been disclosed as yet, the numbers given to Congress reveal that work permit numbers continue to soar.

The numbers include 1 million green cards with work authorization, 1 million employment-based non-immigrant visas for foreign workers, and 1.2 million work-permit authorizations for foreign nationals.

There are 26 million foreign workers in the United States as of 2014, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, terror attacks be damned. And these numbers will probably increase in leaps and bounds as Congress prepares to approve a huge spending bill that will hardly change Obama's plan to increase work permits and bring in 10,000 Syrian Muslims to America.

I can hardly wait to hear their demands as the population of foreign nationals grows exponentially.

"The omnibus will fund 100 percent of the continued issuance of work permits, work visas, green cards and refugee admits, continuing to accelerate the U.S. beyond all known historical immigration precedent," a congressional source said. "The U.S. presently has four times more migrant residents than any other country in the world, regardless of population," hitting a record 42.4 million last year of both legal and illegal immigrants.


Congress will fund 100% of Obama's immigration priorities. Trump wants to halt immigration for a few years. He worries that a Syrian influx of un-vetted immigrants will result in ISIS making it into the country. 

Think of the vast majority of Syrian immigrants as nonviolent moderate Muslims. Now think of the "I Love Lucy" chocolates that get wrapped (in the video I provided) as these moderates. Now imagine the chocolates that get past Lucy and Ethel as ISIS.

See the problem?



Hillary, the ISIS queen

A socialist, a pathological liar, and the invisible man walk into a bar. Just kidding--they walked into the Democratic Debate last night.

The good news is, the Jets beat Dallas (sorry, my Texas friends). The bad news is, Hillary Clinton is still not indicted for her national security breach.

One of the most illuminating moments of the debate was when Bernie Sanders profusely apologized to Hillary regarding his staffer who got his hands on her voters list. 
"Between us we're only 142 years old"

There should be no doubt in the mind of the American voter that Bernie is the kind of weakling we currently have in the White House, only difference is Bernie has a Brooklyn accent. I can hearing him telling Putin, "Oy want to apologize to yew, to Rusha and to the woild faw Amerika's behayvyah in the past. Yew won't get any trouble from me, I can assure yew. We ah very much alike, yew and me, Vladimir."

The other illuminating moment came when Hillary claimed that the United States is "where we need to be" in the fight against ISIS. In other words, she is Barack Obama with lipstick and a better three-point shot.

The Democratic nominee (unless she is charged with the crimes she committed, which is highly unlikely) talked about her anti-ISIS strategy after Bernie and Martin O'Malley (some guy they threw into the mix to add legitimacy to the "race") went after her for backing "regime changes" in Syria and Libya. Of course, these regime changes resulted in a myriad of problems which the liberals didn't foresee.

Her answer to the attack by her so-called competition may have come from her novel "Hard Choices" as she described the jihadist situation as a series of "complex problems." She touted that "We now finally are where we need to be. We have a strategy and a commitment to go after ISIS which is a danger to us as well as the region, and we finally have a U.N. Security Council resolution bringing the world together to go after a political transition in Syria."

The tallest Republican hopeful, Jeb Bush tweeted: "No @HillaryClinton--We are not 'where we need to be' in fight against ISIS."

Then Michelle Obama tweeted a photo of herself holding a sign saying: #BringBackOurGirls.

Bernie Sanders said he wanted to 'tawk' about climate change and the economy.

The Clinton campaign didn't back down as they argued that the U.N. resolution is a positive step, in spite of the fact that most Americans, whose vote is not based on a candidate's physical composition, disagree with that nonsense. 

Clinton made the outrageous claim that ISIS is circulating videos of Trump's comments about Islam as a recruitment tool. "He is becoming ISIS' best recruiter," the Scandal Queen monotoned.

People who will vote for Hillary, even if she beheaded Monica Lewinsky on the debate stage, do not care if she can back up her claim with proof. 

"If Hillary said it, it must be true, for the very mouthing of her words make it true."

And when Donald Trump called the San Bernadino shooting an act radical Islamic terrorism, Hillary argued that his remarks about Muslims are "fanning the flames" abroad for radical Islam. 

In other words, if you see something, call it anything but what you saw because you might make someone angry. What nonsense.

And you have to laugh when you hear Sanders 'tawking' about 'Wall Shtreet' and how much they're going to hate him, as Hillary nods her head in agreement, as if they're going to hate her too.

She doesn't mention that her campaign donor's list includes a ton of Wall Street firms, Time Warner, 21st Century Fox, Lehman Brothers and much more. But if you examine who gives to her foundation in the Nonprofit Quarterly, you will see the vast sums of money given by foreign countries who ask nothing in return but favors if and when she becomes the next POTUS.

That's why some call her the Scandal Queen.


Paris climate talks was big business

Climate change seemed to be the last thing on the minds of the developed countries in attendance of the Paris COP21 (Conference of Parties) if you believe Rajendra Singh, of India.

The Hindu interviewed Singh, a Magsaysay Award winner and water conservationist, in a country where water, especially clean water, is precious and often scarce. 

Mr. Singh is known as the "Waterman of India" and was awarded the Stockholm Water Prize for outstanding achievement in water conservation. This is a real award, not like the Nobel Peace Prize given to terrorists like Yassar Arafat, opportunists like Al Gore, and empty suits like Barack Obama.

Singh described the Paris talks as a playground for business interests of developed countries. "The Paris agreement is a defeat for India, and it is a sign that our country has let developed countries like America take the upper hand," Singh told The Hindu on Saturday.

I see Singh's point but believe it's a case of the liberals in this administration taking the upper hand on underdeveloped countries.

"India's knowledge system prioritizes love and respect for nature. We are leaders in this field, but with the Paris agreement we have given a clear path for commercialization of nature. This is completely against our tradition."

Mr. Singh believes the Paris agreement absolves the United States of its liability for causing climate change in the first place, but China, the biggest polluter on the planet, is not mentioned. Singh feels it is the U.S. that is the biggest climate culprit. 

I believe it's the four seasons that play the biggest role in climate change.

Singh was in Paris during the negotiations and alleges that much of the process was a discussion of business interests rather than environmental concerns. "COP 21 became a playground for business and economic interests of developed countries, and they forced everyone to accept their terms. They are happy now," he said. 

With about 40,000 people in attendance, the real decision-makers made up a "blue zone" of not more than 400 people. "They called the shots," Singh said.

It was due to this exclusionary climate (no pun intended) that Singh organized an alternative COP forum with like-minded activists who actually discussed "climate and not business."

How revolutionary. Someone ought to tell Obama.

Singh added that "If they were really discussing the environment, they would be discussing water and greenery. Instead, they only ended up talking about the sale and purchase of technology and how different consultancies could be engaged to help one another."

Funny how liberals become free-market entrepreneurs when the money goes in their pockets.

He believes that India was willing to go along with the terms of the Paris agreement because it had its own narrow self-interest in mind, in effect telling the U.S. "Look, we absolved you of the blame for the climate change you caused. In return, you should let us use coal to produce electricity," said Singh.

He believes that producing electricity through coal is considered damaging, but India pitches for its right to do so because it needs more energy for manufacturing. "In order to achieve this one thing, you have sold away your traditions and your beliefs," said Singh.

What developed countries need to understand is that burning coal to produce clean energy is a lot better than the poor having to burn dog or cow poop just to keep warm. 

Saturday, December 19, 2015

A terrorist named Sarah got away: the law helped him


Sarah Abdeslam is one of the "jihad-minds" behind the Paris attacks in November. Sarah is a guy in this case, and it was learned that he could have been captured by Belgian police if they were allowed to do their job.

There is a rather stupid Belgian law that prevents raids between the hours of 9 p.m. and 5 a.m. unless there is a crime in progress.

Belgian folks really want a peaceful night's sleep more than they seem to want a peaceful world . . . so they waited until the time was right. 

It was believed that Abdeslam was in an apartment in Molenbeek, a Brussels neighborhood, two days after the attack. But Belgium's [hogtied] justice minister told reporters that the police weren't allowed to capture him due to the law.

What, me worry?
So while the U.S. has its sanctuary cities, Belgium has its sanctuary hours of quiet.

The cops waited until the allotted 5 a.m. and busted into the apartment, but Abdeslam's alarm clock was set for 4:45 a.m. and he split the scene without taking the time to shower.

You may recall that Abdeslam was assigned to blow himself up with a suicide vest as part of the attack, but he must have used chicken wire to arm the device. His vest was found in a garbage bin the following week.

Some of Sarah's fellow jihadists are now saying that he can go to hell for not blowing himself up. They meant that literally.



Federal judge chastises Hamas-linked CAIR

The Counsel on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) may finally be getting its comeuppance in a public trial. The Hamas-linked organization with close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood will get the exposure it so much wants to avoid if the trial takes place. Their biggest fear is for them to be exposed as an embedded, subversive Islamic front group.

Robert Spencer's blog Jihad Watch discusses the case in detail.

On Thursday Federal Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly denied CAIR's motion to reopen discovery in what has become known as the Muslim Mafia Trial.

CAIR sued the Center for Security Policy (CSP) and its employees back in 2008 for compiling a documentary to expose CAIR's Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas ties along with other illegal activities. 

In the documentary, Dave Gaubatz and his son, Chris, went undercover as CAIR interns and learned of multiple crimes committed by CAIR. From the information they gathered, renown author, Paul Sperry, wrote a book describing CAIR's crimes and terrorist connections. Dave taught Chris to work as a CAIR intern and gain access to the criminal evidence.

However, there was no investigation by the Department of Justice or the FBI. Instead, CAIR sued Gaubatz and his son for wiretapping and computer hacking and other charges. But even with the information they gathered against CAIR, the Obama administration has done nothing about it, and this gave the terror-linked group to open the lawsuit, and since the suit began, CAIR added more defendants including CSP which is headed by Frank Gaffney, a Reagan administration official.

The American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) founded and led by David Yerushalmi and Robert Muise, represents the CSP defendants. Yerushalmi has also represented Pamela Geller, the co-founder of the American Freedom Defense Initiative, in legal battles with CAIR.

Earlier this year, the federal court had ordered both parties to prepare for trial or mediate a settlement. CAIR, with its terrorist connections was in no position to settle and after months of delay, and its 12th lawyer for the case, Haytham Faraj, the Hamas-linked organization filed a motion to re-open discovery and allow CAIR's counsel to name experts who could testify about the reputational damages the poor dears suffered as a result of the publication of the book Muslim Mafia. 

Yerushalmi and Muise filed an opposition to the motion saying that Faraj failed to explain why the case should be further delayed and not ready for trial (since it had 7 freaking years to get ready).

The AFLC lawyers also pointed out in the opposition that CAIR had early on in the case renounced any claim for reputational damages, including any losses attributed to loss in donor income or the inability to lobby government officials, because CAIR didn't want its reputation placed center-stage in the litigation.

The Court agreed with AFLC and denied CAIR's motion:
Although a trial date has not yet been set in this case, the dispositive motions in this case are finally resolved, and it is now time to prepare for trial rather than time to reopen discovery, particularly when certain prior decisions of the Court were premised on the explicit disclaimer of reputational damages. Reopening discovery at this point, even for a limited purpose, would not serve a "just, speedy, and inexpensive" resolution of this matter. Accordingly, for all of these reasons, and given the long history of this case recounted above, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have not shown good cause to reopen discovery, and Plaintiffs' motion is DENIED.
The judge added a warning comment to CAIR and its new counsel:
The Court notes that this request to reopen discovery comes as Plaintiffs retained new attorneys--once again--purportedly to take this case to trial. While it is Plaintiffs' prerogative to switch jockeys mid-course, they may not rewind time and begin the race again. To do so would be neither fair nor efficient.
Both AFLC lawyers applauded the judge's ruling and are eager to expose CAIR as the "subversive Islamist front group" that it is.

CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator and Muslim Brotherhood-Hamas front groups by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office in the Holy Land Foundation trials (HLF).

HLF was a fund raiser for violent jihad by Hamas and top CAIR leaders were part of the conspiracy. From this, the FBI publicly ended its outreach activities with CAIR and the United Arab Emirates has officially declared CAIR a terrorist organization.

In spite of this, however, president Obama continues to have a relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood, of which CAIR is an arm.