Posts
Most Americans agree with the CIA's Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EIT) according to an NBC poll. Yes, I said NBC. Fully 51% of respondents to the poll believe that interrogation techniques used on the Bush administration were acceptable. Only 28% said EIT went too far.
One American who actually works for the network, didn't appear to believe her own network's poll. Andrea Mitchell, wife of Alan Greenspan, and host of her own MSNBC show apparently didn't like the numbers in the poll.
But Mitchell is an uber-liberal and uber-liberals don't need actual data to tell them what is real and what they believe is real.
Speaking to NBC's chief foreign so-called correspondent, Richard Engel, she warned her audience of 57 (same as the number of states in the Union, according to Barack Obama) that polling is "always an imprecise measure because of the way questions are asked."
She might have wanted NBC to phrase the question: "If it was your aunt Minnie or any loved one was being tortured by waterboarding and sleep deprivation, would you have approved of those methods?"
Engel, Mitchell's 'yes man,' agreed with her. He said that those responding to the poll were simply responding emotionally (not that emotions have anything to do with libtard thinking) and that they might have been proven morally wrong by "history."
They might have been proven factually necessary by current events if they had not been used and we had another 911.
But nothing stops an uber-liberal from opining. Mitchell showed how she feels about democracy when she asked, "Should pubic opinion really be setting policy?"
No Andrea. Your husband set interests rates without asking us. Why shouldn't you set policy?
Engel, ever the butt-boy, agreed with her saying, "Exactly."
Now you know why MSNBC leaves a sucking sound on your TV when you turn it off.
Tweet
One American who actually works for the network, didn't appear to believe her own network's poll. Andrea Mitchell, wife of Alan Greenspan, and host of her own MSNBC show apparently didn't like the numbers in the poll.
But Mitchell is an uber-liberal and uber-liberals don't need actual data to tell them what is real and what they believe is real.
Speaking to NBC's chief foreign so-called correspondent, Richard Engel, she warned her audience of 57 (same as the number of states in the Union, according to Barack Obama) that polling is "always an imprecise measure because of the way questions are asked."
She might have wanted NBC to phrase the question: "If it was your aunt Minnie or any loved one was being tortured by waterboarding and sleep deprivation, would you have approved of those methods?"
Engel, Mitchell's 'yes man,' agreed with her. He said that those responding to the poll were simply responding emotionally (not that emotions have anything to do with libtard thinking) and that they might have been proven morally wrong by "history."
They might have been proven factually necessary by current events if they had not been used and we had another 911.
But nothing stops an uber-liberal from opining. Mitchell showed how she feels about democracy when she asked, "Should pubic opinion really be setting policy?"
No Andrea. Your husband set interests rates without asking us. Why shouldn't you set policy?
Engel, ever the butt-boy, agreed with her saying, "Exactly."
Now you know why MSNBC leaves a sucking sound on your TV when you turn it off.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment