The Religion of Peace? Let's Do the Math--Part 1

What is the true nature of Islam? Is it a religion of peace, like G.W. Bush, Barack Hussein Obama, all liberals including the mainstream media claim, or is it a misogynistic, brutal, backward, intolerant, violent, intellectually barren ideology out to destroy Western civilization and everything un-Islamic?  The popular sterilized view is that Islam is one of the great world religions--peaceful, a foundation of true world civilized thought, and its Golden Age was the high point of human history.

The numbers suggest otherwise.

In order to understand Islam, we must understand that the foundation of the religion is based on a trilogy of the Koran and Sunna, and since the Sunna is found in the Sira and Hadith, then these three texts, Koran, Sunna, and Hadith comprise all that is accepted in Islam--if it isn't there, it isn't Islamic.


1. Women and the men who abuse them: there is a separate set of rules for men and women in the religion of peace. If you consider the Koran verses (a total of 151 verses in all) in the trilogy that attribute women their status with High-Equal-or Low Status, the breakdown, taken from all verses is: High Status= 5.3% Equal Status=23% and Low Status= 71%.  Not very cheerful numbers for those people who have no penis. 

But all Koraning aside, let's look at the Hadith, those texts that include the Sira, or Mohammad's bio, and the Hadith, which is a collection of small stories, and obsessive-compulsive traditions (like Mohammad wiping his penis tip with a stone after urinating, and another tradition of killing dudes for their booty and taking their wives as slaves). The Hadith numbers have a similar outcome, and are based upon a total of 49,151 words of text from this holy book: High Status= 0.13% Equal Status= 7.1% and Low Status= 93%. Holy moley Batgirl, you're screwed.

Girls ready for marriage: they're potty-trained

Needless to say, statistics imply that women have a significantly low status in both the Koran and Hadith. However, women are given the priviledge of not being age restricted to marry any man, in religious Islamic countries. In fact, many very young women, who I will refer to as girls, are getting married to older men, who I will refer to as "old farts," all the time. This is because Mohammad married Aisha when she was 6 and consummated the marriage when she was 9--so in Saudi Arabia, women are allowed to marry, whether they like it or not, at the age of 9, just like Mohammad's wife.


2. The Koran, Allah's Perfect Book for All Time, except for some imperfections: When considering the Koran, we need to understand that, in effect, there are two Korans--the first when Mohammad was in Mecca, and the second, when he and his merry band of men went to Medina. The trouble is, the Koran you find today is not the same as the one in 632 AD, when the prophet of Islam died. Uthman, a supreme ruler, or caliph, rearranged Allah's perfect masterpiece, and put the chapters (called Suras) not in chronological order, which would have made sense, but from longest chapter to shortest chapter--you know, like in school we called it "size place."  (Why? Because that is what wiping off your penis with a stone does to your brain, I suppose.)

But if you know anything about Islam, there were few Muslims when Mohammad was in Medina. Mo lived there for about 13 years, and in all that time, he had only about 250 Islamic followers. When Mohammad and his army cameled their way into Medina, the followers grew like the dickens, and there were about 10 thousand, and by the time Mo bought the proverbial farm, there were about 100 thousand Muslims.


And the Medina Koran, when Mo's forces were strong, with men coming out the wazoo, had a tone that was much different than the Mecca Koran. In Medina, the Koran talks hardly at all about Allah, but becomes political in the sense that it speaks about kafirs, or deceivers, polytheists, idolaters, and just very very bad people indeed. Kafir is not a glowing term, so if a Muslim man calls you a kafir, know that he doesn't like you. Fully 64% of the Medina Koran is devoted to kafirs and explains why good Muslims should hate them. The Medina Koran also badmouths the Jews, because Mo was upset with them for refusing to drop their God and accept his god--an angry god who had an uncanny resemblance to the big M.

When you think of either Koran, think of President Obama's attitude of "I can do no wrong," and you'll have a similar feeling about Mohammad. It says 91 times in the holy book that Mo is the perfect Muslim. He is the divine human prototype and the only pattern of living that Allah finds acceptable and cool. Obama says that he is the perfect President, rivaled only by Lincoln, LBJ, and Teddy Roosevelt. 


So next time someone tells you that nobody's perfect, refer them to Mohammad and Obama.

This is part one of three parts, more or less. If you liked this, tell your friends. If you didn't like this, you may be a liberal.  for part 2 click here 

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

I See Your Race Card and Raise You One Dead Border Agent

     Yes he's black, and so is Obama, sort of. Yes, people don't seem to like him and they want him to resign or be impeached, so too Obama. But just because he's incompetent or has "dirty hands," doesn't make us, who think he should go, racists, nor does it make him any less culpable, incompetent, just plain stupid, or all of the above. I would say, "so too Obama," but that would be like me making fun of Jesus Christ, or drawing a picture of Muhammad. Probably more like drawing Muhammad than Jesus, knowing what we know about our present President.

     He told the New York Times that this is a way to get at the presiden--by getting at him they get at Obama--because they're both black. Allen West R-FL, said that it's nonsense, and of course, it is. It's just another way to deflect from Holder's legal worries, and Obama's incompetence, and another way to divide us--not just left and right, but now in black and white. Ridiculous.

     But Eric Holder, aka, Eric the Rat Whisperer Withholder, aka, Eric the Red, aka, Yo Eric, is the most incompetent or perhaps most seditious Attorney General we've ever had in this country. He would make a great police officer in Calcutta where bribes are rampant, or an Occupy DoJ protester, if that category existed. As a person whose job it is to uphold the Constitution of the United States, the Attorney General has a general rule of disregarding it, unless it meets the needs of Obama or the party of the left. His race has nothing to do with anything. Not pursuing the unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land trial, CAIR, when the case should have gone to trial, is just another example of his Obama-style do-nothing policies. It is more than outrageous--it's un-American.


     Todd Rokita, R-IN is still awaiting a response from Holder to his letter about voter fraud from 2010. You know, that case where people's signatures were fraudulent and they never signed the petition for Obama to be allowed to run in that state. Nothing happened to the New Black Panthers in Philadelphia when, in the 2008 election, they intimidated white voters into not voting, and this was caught on tape--Holder did nothing, as usual.

Brian Terry

     So call those who oppose you racists, because that's your best shot. You can't deny the charges against you, and Brian Terry is dead because of your screwed up ideas over gun control and how to trick the American people into going along with it.
 

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

Tweet

Freudian Islam: the Shame of Veggies (Peas Be Up In Him)

Phil the Happy Phallus

For you and me, a European cucumber, a pair of apples, and throw in some sprouts, we have some of the makings of a salad. For Saudi Arabian Muslims, we have a very large penis, pink testicles, and pubic hair. For us, a banana, for them a phallus. For us, a banana split, for them, well, you get it. An article in el-Senousa News featured this guy, a Muslim cleric, in a recent article about fruits and vegetables and how they can be, well, sexually stimulating to men with minds that get sexually stimulated over the removal of a bandaid.

Sex Orgy

No kidding--an Islamic cleric living in Erurope gets turned on when Muslim women, even those shrouded in complete burqas, touch these items with their naked hands. Knowing what it does to him, he is concerned that all Muslim men are susceptible to the fruitful caresses of women when they go shopping. The cleric sees phalluses everywhere, and they become his phallus when women make salad. And Allah forbid they have to cut them up to serve--it hurts so bad--so they must have their husband, brother, or son do the job, because this cleric believes that all Muslim men are like him, and this would cause them to "go zucchini." 

The Last 2011 GOP Debate on Fox

So, who won last night's GOP campaign debate on Fox? In my opinion, it was definitely Newt, and it was absolutely necessary for his campaign that he did win in Iowa because he had lost 12 points from the previous one. His responses on the Keystone pipeline, defense and what he said about judges, was excellent. Not so excellent was how he responded to Michele Bachmann's attack on the money Newt received from Fannie and Freddiem where he kept claiming he wasn't a lobbyist. Sorry, but anyone with anything beyond a medulla knows he had to be getting Republican support for those programs. Otherwise, Newt kicked butt. Interestingly, the New York Times did not even mention Fox News, nor any on the panel--they remain the Democratic campaign information center.

With Cain gone, Ron Paul picked up lots of numbers and went into Iowa as the great Democratic hope--the dems know that if Paul runs, Obama wins--but after last night, the American public should have come to its senses with Paul's delusions that 9-11 and terrorist attacks in the United States is due to the fact that we are in their country and this pisses them off. This, of course, discounts the Islamic concept of jihad, the clear statement of Ahmadinejad that he will destroy us, Israel, and anyone else who plans to eat at a kosher deli. It discounts the Beirut bombing, the shores of Tripoli, and even what Mohammad has said of us infidels. Paul is not a fool--Paul is a dangerous fool. Worse, he's even anti-Semitic with the pretense of cutting off aid to them for their own good. That's like putting a cigarette out on the carpet to make it stronger. So hopefully, Paul is in the toilet where he can do no harm as he spins down into the oblivion of where Chamberlain dwells.


Mitt was okay, especially on his defense of his governor stint in Massachusetts, and I do not believe he hurt himself and will stay around the 20s in the race. Michele Bachmann, I feel, attacked Newt a little more than necessary, but she drew blood at the Fannie Freddie attack. Does that help or hurt her? We shall find out.


Rick Perry has become more proficient as a debater, but is too stuck on his talking points, and needs to get out of Dodge, literally--he needs to get beyond Texas if he plans to run the rest of the country.

Rick Santorum looked as if the Alka Seltzer is working. There was no uncomfortable gassy look on his face, and his record as a conservative rings true, as Michele's does too. 


Finally, my last word on Newt was his high point, which came when he mentioned that he would kick Obama's butt in a debate.  If he refused to debate with Newt, he would do what Lincoln did to Douglas and follow his schedule, show up 4 hours behind Obama, and rip his speeches apart. Everyone knows debating is Newt's strength, so this was the perfect response. But let's not forget that Obama is no slouch when it comes to talking--that's all he does, and nobody says nothing better than him. It's going to be an interesting ride in the months ahead.





Tweet

Snarky Anger Makes Me Laugh

I blogged about my predictions regarding tonight's debate and posted it this morning. I mentioned how Newt has a large ego and Mitt has attacked him and vice versa. This is more than my opinion, it's fact and it's historically true, and it's part of the campaign process that seems to have morphed into a verbal confrontation amongst candidates. It happens on both sides and for me, it's unfortunate as I would rather see an intellectual exchange based on policies, rather than ad hominem attacks based on truths, half-truths, and lies.

But someone named "Anonymous" attacked me for "playing psychoanalyst" as I mentioned that I played one, in jest, when, in fact, I worked for over 20 years as a psychotherapist, using cognitive-behavioral techiques. I specializing in depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, particularly Panic Disorder, with and without Agoraphobia, as well as Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Social Anxiety. I have since retired from this field, not to manage a McDonald's as my attacker suggested, but to write and do photography. I have done both successfully like, I imagine, Anonymous has attacked others successfully. How sad AnonyMouse has to do this to make herself or himself happy--I'm not sure of the gender, but while the word usage sounded masculine, the method of attack sounded feminine-feline.

I briefly touched upon Ron Paul, who I believe would lead America down a self-destructive path with his foreign hands-off-Iran-Can-Build-Whatever-It-Wants policy, and his anti-Zionist sentiments. I suspect Anonymous is a Ron Paul fan and the word 'fan' comes from 'fanatic,' so you know where I'm coming from. If he is not a Ron Paul fan, then I have no doubts he's a liberal-socialist-Marxist-Obama-tingler.

Anyway, I love making people like AnonyMouse rant and rave because they think they matter in the final analysis. But the truth is, in the final analysis, nobody who rants and attacks others for their beliefs from a safe anonymous position, has done anything to build America. In fact, they would do what they could to change America (sounds a little like the O-Man?), but fortunately, they are impotent to change anything, including their clothing without their mommy's help. 

American core values should never change, which is why we should respect the Constitution--and why Ron Paul is half right, because he does, in his own funny way. But it was interesting, this attack on me, saying that I should go back to my job managing a McDonald's, as if this mouse who roared thinks she could manage anything at all. I apologize to all restaurant managers, and all of us who actually work for a living. 

For you, Anonymous

The only thing she was able to manage, was to get me to laugh at her feeble attempt of insult and pseudointellectual banter, disguised as criticism. I honestly feel sorry for her, or him, or whatever. Closet attackers have no courage, which is why they do nothing to build the nation, only try to tear it down along with those who love it. 

Tweet

My Fox Debate Predictions for Dec. 14, 2011

Pre-Cain MSM Scandal

I'm not a political analyst--but I was a psychoanalyst in my earlier life, and I believe knowing something about human nature can be somewhat helpful in predicting tonight's debate on Fox News. My predictions are a bit unconventional for me, because I believe the person I saw as the brightest guy in the room, is going to flub it tonight. Of course I'm speaking about the New Newt.

Newt is, without a doubt, the master debater compared to the rest of the crew. He is quick with his answers, glib with his expressions, and humble about his past. But his main problem is that ego of his. He attacked Mitt about his work in the private sector, because Mitt attacked him with his work Fannie and Freddie and la chambre a coucher. Newt did not allow his brain to engage his tongue before responding, and that seems typical of people with big egos.

But I like much of what the Newtster says, and I really like the way he says it. His ideas on immigration seem rational, and his thougths about Palestine being invented history is true; but Mitt is more thoughtful in his approach to the Palestinian-Israeli problem than Newt, while Newt is more sincere. For me, this is the biggest problem America and the free world faces regarding security and the Islamic problem the religion of peace poses. 

Getting back to immigration--there is no rational way we can elect a president who wants to deport all illegal aliens. I'm a law and order guy, I even watch it on TV, but any candidate taking that stand will lose the independent vote and Obama will continue his reign as socialist POTUS. Ron Paul's idea of not allowing them benefits or jobs and thus forcing them to leave, sounds like a plan, but Paul strikes me as a person who left his work at medicine because he couldn't stand people being helped. He takes that stance on Israel and pretends he's doing them a favor by allowing them to remain independent--he just leaves out the part about also being vulnerable to the surrounding Muslim nations that want death to the Jews, and an end to Israel. Paul is as anti-Zionist as they come.


Michelle Backmann is a true conservative, but she's a one-issue candidate and that isn't enough. Her stance on health care and repeal of Obaminationcare is right on the money, and she actually knows a thing or two about foreign affairs, while never having one in her past, but she doesn't stand up to the electability test. She will probably remain at the low end of the totem pole tonight.


Ron Huntsman is an arrogant RINO who is gracing the podium with his revered presence. Independents may like him but true conservatives see him as a liberal with an attitude. His knowledge of Mandarin, however, will get him good service at Fong Chow's, but I'm afraid that if he was nominated, we would have the same fiscal problems that Obama has ameliorated with his socialist policies and Russian czar appointees. Personally, I'd like to see Rick Santorum punch Huntsman in the kisser.


And speaking of Rick's, Perry should pull the plug, get back on his horse, and ride out into the sunset. Yes, he's making tons of expensive commercials and may have influenced the conservative Christian vote, but as a debater, he sucks, and just because he admits that he sucks, is not a good reason to give him a free pass. A good candidate must be a good debater. Mitt was excellent in the last debate, and Newt was kind of vanilla. But tonight's debate will be the big one, I think. Tonight's debate will tell us who should go forward, and in part, who should step away and hang up their guns.

"Number one . . . uh, um . . ."

I'll be blogging my thoughts tomorrow about the debate. I'd be grateful for your feedback and criticism--but remember, this is a family blog, so watch the expletives, please.


Tweet

274 American Servicemen's Bodies Dumped in a Garbage Dump

 I'm not a tough guy but I don't cry very readily for most things. I nearly did cry, however, after hearing about the 274 US Air Force bodies and body parts, totaling 976 fragments, and over 1700 unidentified remains, that were contracted out for cremation and disposal at a private site. Yes, these servicemen, and women, ended up in a garbage dump, wait, a landfill--sorry, that sounds much better--at the King George Landfill in Virginia. The job was contracted out by Dover Air Force Base and given to the MedTrace Inc. medical waste company, who say they were not aware of the content of the boxes they recieved with the military dead. This secret practice was halted 3 years ago, and was allegedly never revealed to the Pentagon officials who might have been adverse to dumping heroes in a dump.


The reason given as to why these bodies were treated this way was because there were no family members to claim them. I suspect this was also true with the "Unknown Soldier" but he was treated differently in the old days.

Have we gotten so callous as a nation, so uncaring and cold? Or is it that we are so damned lazy that we shirk our duties as human beings? Are we taking for granted those who would serve us and protect us? Where is the shame in all this--why has the concept of life deteriorated to the point where we can do this to our heroes? I am not blaming you, dear reader, but those in power who allowed this to happen on their watch need to do something for those who died serving our nation.


These military men and women had parents; some may have had children, and spouses, people who loved them in life and continue to love them in death. They deserve the same honor we accord our own families--because they are family. But the military, our government, felt the shame of this act and did not release the names of those who were dumped like garbage in a landfill, lest someone who was a family member become upset. People who do this deserve the shame, and so do many politicians whose honor has long deteriorated like those who allowed this to happen.

One thing that makes sense to me is the likelihood that those who did this are secular rather than religious. Not that all secular liberals are bad people, just misinformed about right and wrong.

If you are interested in reading a novel about Islam, terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links below for both the hard copy (softcover) edition and the ebook edition of my latest novel.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a NY based reporter who is taken hostage by Islamic terrorists and must talk his way out of captivity before he is beheaded the following day. The clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe: a Novel   Create Space Hardcopy edition

Jihad Joe see it here

ebook version
Tweet

Walter Reed Anti-Religion Medical Center

 In September of this year, a memo went out at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. The memo was sent by their Chief of Staff, Colonel C.W. Callahan, and it pertained to visitors of the wounded heroes, many of whom fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, and it stated: "No religious items (i.e., Bibles, reading material, and/or artifacts) are allowed to be given away or used during a visit."  

In other words, friends and families were not permitted their First Amendment rights, the same rights these warriors fought to preserve for our country. Representative Steve King (R-IA), who serves on the House subcommittee on the Constitution, was quite upset with this policy.  In his response to this he stated: "The idea that these soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines that have fought to defend our Constitution--and that includes the First Amendment rights to religious liberty--would be denied that religious liberty when they are lying in a hospital bed recovering from wounds incurred while defending that liberty is the most bitter and offensive type of an irony that I can think of." 

The text below is a rescinding statement subsequently put out by the hospital, but Callahan still has a job, and all this took place while prisoners at Gitmo were provided with Korans, handed to them by guards who were required to wear gloves so as not to soil the 'holy book' with their dirty hands of infidels. One can only wonder what the Medical Center would have done if Muslim visitors wanted to bring their Korans.

Here is their statement found on the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Homepage:
      

We are in the process of rewriting our policy and would like to offer the following statement:

Bibles and other religious materials have always been and will remain available for patient use at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. The visitation policy as written was incorrect and should have been more thoroughly reviewed before its release. It has been rescinded. We apologize for any confusion the policy may have caused.

Please know that at admission, all patients are asked for their religious preference and a chaplain associated with their preference visits them regularly to provide spiritual services. In addition, their families may also bring religious material and we will not refuse any religious group entrance.

WRNMMC provides multiple venues at WRMNMC for religious expression and worship. There is daily Catholic Mass as well as Protestant, Hindu, and Muslim services. Eucharist is also available at the bedside. There are weekly Torah studies, multiple weekly Christian bible studies, as well as weekly Qur'an study. Furthermore, chaplains coordinate spiritual needs for those whose faith groups are not represented by staff chaplains (such as Latter-Day Saints, Buddhist, and Christian Scientist).

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center remains committed to supporting the religious preferences of all our patients and we will continue to ensure their spiritual needs are met. 

Their version of religious artifact

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Their public affairs officer Sandy Dean told the press, when the story first broke at the beginning of this month, that  a new policy "will be written to articulate our initial intention, which was to respect religious and cultural practices of our patients." This is nonsense and obvious when she further stated that the policy was "in no way meant to prohibit family members from providing religious items to their loved ones at all."   


Read the memo from Callahan again. Tell me, how is anything in that memo ambiguous? Lies, lies, and more lies. Just another example of the Obama administration's war on religion, his "metrosexual military" that sees diversity as more important than military preparedness, and his secular leftist views that exclude Christianity, but include Islam, the "religion of peace."

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

Conservatweets ebook free download

Tweet