Monday, June 6, 2022

Carolina Panthers add 1st transgender woman to cheer squad



The Carolina Panthers have announced that they are adding Justine Simone Lindsay, a transgender woman, to their squad of biological women. According to Lindsay's Instagram post, he has made the Panthers' TopCats squad.

“Cats Out the Bag you are looking at the newest member of the Carolina Panthers TopCats Cheerleader’s @topcats as the first Transgender female,” he wrote on Instagram. “I would like to thank the beautiful and talented dancers who supported me along the way alumni TopCats family and friends for your love and support.”

The TopCats didn't announce that the 29-year-old was a biological man with gender dysphoria, but The Spin noted that the squad knew that Lindsay was transgender from the outset, [possibly from visual evidence in the squad's changing room].

“My goal is to create a team of individuals that are absolute fire on the field but are incredible human beings in the locker room, good friends, good people, and at the end of the day, you have to walk through the door first to get to that spot,” TopCats director Chandalae Lanouette told BuzzFeed News.

Lindsay is the NFL’s first transgender cheerleader that we know of, but he didn't reveal to his followers that he was trying out for the squad ahead of time, lest he not make the cut.

“I was so scared,” he told BuzzFeed. “There’s just some things you can’t post.”

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

“I’m happy because I was able to break down that door and tell people, hey, we are not just sexual beings,” Lindsay concluded. “We are actual human beings who want to better ourselves. I felt like why not tell the world — hey listen, this is a great accomplishment.”

The Panthers players are simply over the moon with the new addition to their cheerleading women.

Sunday, June 5, 2022

LA DA Gascon walks back claim of sheriff's involvement in hit-and-run case


Hard left Los Angeles DA George Gascon is up for recall and needs only about 60 thousand additional signatures for this to go forward by July 6th, and it looks like they will get them. LA county is practically lawless under his watch and people have finally awakened to it.

Now Gascon, a George Soros supported DA, is walking back his claim that the sheriff's department "agreed with the felony charges" and extremely light sentencing against a teenager convicted of intentionally driving a car into a mother and her infant son on August 6, 2021.

The driven now 17, pleaded guilty to two felony charges of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury and one felony count of hit-and-run. He was sentenced to a 5 to 7 month vacation in a juvenile probation camp. I call it a vacation because the camp has been described by prosecutors as  "less than a military school and a little bit tougher than a summer camp."

An initial statement by Gascon provided to Fox News Digital said that the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department agreed with the charges and sentencing. Turns out Gascon isn't just incompetent, he's also a liar. 

His office told the media:
"Fortunately, the baby was uninjured, and the mother received a laceration to her elbow. The Sheriff’s Department agreed with the felony charges that were filed. At arraignment, the minor admitted two felony counts of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury and one felony count of hit-and-run. The Probation Department recommended, and the court sentenced the minor to a youth camp for five to seven months, an appropriate resolution."
The statement added that juvenile justice is intended to "rehabilitate young people." [By evidently not holding them accountable for violent criminal behavior.]

"In this case, this teen will be held accountable for his actions and receive the needed services to foster positive development to keep him from committing future offenses," the fallacious statement read.

Los Angeles Sheriff Alex Villanueva called out Gascon saying, "We were never consulted as we were not the investigating agency." 



Once Gascon's office was "outed" it corrected the statement on Saturday, admitting that the sheriff's office was not involved.

"Need to correct our statement [aka false claim] from yesterday. LASD was not involved in the decision on the felony charge, as they were not the investigating agency in that case," a spokesperson for the district attorney's office said.

Villanueva had previously said that his office was not consulted regarding the charges.

"We were never consulted as we were not the investigating agency," the Los Angeles official wrote on Facebook and Twitter early Saturday. "Sheriff’s investigators would never be OK with the lightweight sentencing in this hit-and-run case. Stop empowering and encouraging criminal behavior. Hold them accountable #VictimsMatter."


The incident of what appears to be attempted murder was caught on surveillance video and shows the car hitting the mother and her infant in a stroller.

The mother wrote in a victim's impact report that she thought "those were the last moments of our lives."

"I thought those were the last moments of our lives; we were dead," the mother, who asked to be identified only as Rachel, wrote in a victim’s impact statement. "That feeling, along with the memory of a car accelerating directly into us, will haunt me forever."

Police sources say that the driver, who was 16 at the time, initially told police that the mother appeared out of nowhere and hit her on accident with the stolen car.

"As the car approached me and my child, I stopped walking and moved the stroller and myself up against a building on the right side of the road to ensure that we gave the reckless driver plenty of room to pass," Rachel said. "As the car got dangerously close to us, [the juvenile suspect] turned the wheels in our direction and accelerated as he aimed to kill us."

Rachel blasted Gascon for what she feels is basically a non-sentence because it is so light.

"I was also told that his record would be wiped clean when he turns 18," she continued. "How on earth can that be? He tried to murder two innocent pedestrians. Murder. And we have video evidence. My child would be dead if I hadn’t been there to protect him."

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

A better sentence might be that the driver is banned from driving until he reaches the age of at least 35. If caught driving before that time he would be sentenced to 20 years in prison and stripped of his future driving privileges. His record should not be wiped clean. 

And Gascon must go. 

Saturday, June 4, 2022

Film critics afraid to review Matt Walsh's "What is a Woman"


Their bravery is only excelled by Alexandria Obviously-Commie's who was not quite killed on January 6th by a guy in buffalo horns at the Capitol riots. The bravery I'm referring to is to those film critics who refuse to look at "What is a Woman?", a documentary by Daily Wire's Matt Walsh that explores the question the left cannot or will not answer: the definition of the word 'woman.'

People who lack a cohesive argument are quick to call others racists and bigots if they don't share the same ideologies, and in the case of this documentary, these film critics are obviously too scared to put themselves out in the public eye and actually critique the artistry of the movie, and the message it expresses. They know that if they had the courage to see it and provide an honest review, they would be cancelled and stripped of their freedom of expression by the mob on the left. They are so scared that they are refusing to watch it.

When the documentary was first live-streamed on Daily Wire and was the single most-trafficked live stream ever presented by them, progressive film critics refused to view it and hurled profanity and insults accusing it of being "transphobic" bigotry. Also, someone tried to block the premiere stream from being seen 

The word 'transphobic' is a make-believe term. It is used to shut people up who, for example, do not want their young children being read to by a man dressed as a sexualized woman wearing clown makeup at the public library's "Drag Queen Story Hour." It's the same strategy the left uses with the word 'racist,' which means whatever the left doesn't like. 

And while leftist film critics didn't watch it, they gave it bad reviews. This should tell you about their film review credibility and moral courage. 

But fans love it — although only one critic had the courage to offer a review, audience members gave the original film a 98% score on Rotten Tomatoes.

On Friday, Matt Walsh shared some email responses from so-called film critics invited to watch "What is a Woman?" by Daily Wire VP of Publishing Alyssa Cordova.

Despite “What is a Woman?” being “the most talked about film in the country right now and a smash hit,” according to Walsh, film critics “were less than enthusiastic” when given the opportunity to share their thoughts. [By being "less than enthusiastic," they were more than cowardly.]
“What Is A Woman” is the most talked about film in the country right now and a smash hit. We thought film critics might be interested in giving it a look. Here are the responses we got back when we sent out the screener. They were less than enthusiastic it turns out pic.twitter.com/cHAQnVEBHV

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog)
“Unsubscribe. Lose my email. Forget my name,” one critic said, shaking like the tail of a rattlesnake.

“Hard f***ing pass. I won’t give that transphobic bigot a platform on my site,” added another, ignorant of the content of the film. “Never email me again!”

“Absolutely f***ing not. He’s a bigot and you should be ashamed to be associated with him,” offered a third. “Have a great weekend!”

“Yeah, I’m not reviewing a film by a bigot,” another lashed out.

How is Matt Walsh a bigot? Perhaps Matt should do another documentary "What is a Bigot?" It's beginning to sound a lot like racist and the truth is, the people who call him that have likely never listened to his program on Daily Wire. The left loves to use moving target definitions that always suit their arguments.

Cordova said that she realized “if we received any reviews as a result of this pitch that many — or even most — would be scathingly bad.” But she was surprised that even film critics are “so ideologically hollow that they can’t stand to actually WATCH the movie to give it a bad review.”

It isn't that they cannot stand to watch the movie; it's that if they do, they would be blackballed and canceled by others who did not watch the movie.

Opinions based in ignorance are acceptable to the left as long as they concur with their preconceived notions.

Those of us who watched the film — which is available on demand for Daily Wire subscribers — aren't surprised to see that the so-called “experts” refuse to view it or even engage with ideas that challenge their unscientific and illogical worldview. 

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

In "What is a Woman?" Matt sits down with medical professions, lawmakers, activists and other promoters of radical gender theory as he looks to find the answer to that very simple question. He is usually met with definitions like "a woman is someone who identifies as a woman," which is circular and unacceptable as a definition, or clear anger and attacks on his character for even asking the question. It's fun to watch how these so-called "experts" can't even offer a real definition of what is a woman.

“Someone doesn’t want you to see this movie. See it anyway.”

Friday, June 3, 2022

Report: Hunter caught making porn flicks and shared them with 'Dad'



The idiot son of PINO Joe Biden is still the smartest man he knows, so taken literally, that means Joe thinks that Hunter Biden is smarter than Barack Obama, Michelle Obama [if the rumors are true], John Kerry, Jeffrey Epstein, and Xi Jinping, to name just a few. This should gives us a clue about Joe's own intelligence and analytical abilities, but to even imply Joe has analytical abilities is a stretch.

As you may have known, Hunter Biden slept with his dead brother's wife [which tells you something about her too], loves crack cocaine, sneaky business dealings with China and Ukraine, and enjoying the company of prostitutes.

The Daily Mail published an exclusive, highlighting the lowlights of Hunter's internet search history, the contents of which will surprise absolutely no one but the women of "The View."

According to Daily Mail, "Hunter Biden's search history reveals an obsession with porn including incest fantasies, '18yrs old', 'lonely widow' porn, 'MILK crack cocaine porn'" and a whole host of other disturbing and revealing subjects.

Beyond his PornHub search history, he like sharing his sexual exploits with a wide audience. He recorded homemade videos with various women of questionable character to upload to the website and shared links to videos to Joe Biden, or someone he calls "Dad," using text messages.


According to Daily Mail, Hunter "texted a link to a PornHub page to a phone number he had saved in his contacts book as 'Dad' on October 22, 2018," just 4 days prior to Hillary Clinton's birthday. While one may have little or perhaps nothing to do with the other, it's always worth mentioning Hillary in some negative context because she deserves it.

However, The Mail also goes on to say that in other texts, he and POTUS used each other's phone numbers at various times. "Dad" could have been someone else--even Hillary Clinton or perhaps Bill. Dad certainly cannot refer to himself because he has an out of wedlock child and he has not been a "Dad" to her, unless you preface it with "deadbeat."

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Hunter's laptop was full of videos of himself in playful antics with whores. One can imagine from the clips, how Hunter could be called a genius by his father who has lost the ability to distinguish genius from genitals. 

Now just imagine Hunter serving on the board of a large corporation in Ukraine.


ACLU wants Johnny Depp to pay Amber Heard's legal expenses:




The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) with the oxymoronic name, demands that Johnny Depp, the winner in the case against his lying ex-wife, Amber Heard, pay the legal expenses  it incurred during the defamation lawsuit. It's like asking a shooting victim to pay the shooter for the bullet.

Radar Online reported that it obtained court documents that show the ACLU filed a motion seeking reimbursement as part of the 2021 lawsuit Depp filed against the ACLU. Depp sued the ACLU for records related to Heard.

The newly filed motion asks for $86,253.26 for production expenses from Depp, but he should sue them for writing the hit piece against him in Heard's name in the amount of $86,254.26 just to make a point.

They argue the star should reimburse them for the “considerable expense spent responding to onerous subpoenas served by Mr. Depp from an underlying action in which neither the ACLU nor any of its employees are parties.”

One might imagine that the ACLU does not ask others who request documents from them and they are only doing so because he kicked Amber Heard's butt in the proceedings and the ACLU got caught over the hit piece.

The organization said they had to review 7,500 documents and eventually turned over 2,000 documents to comply with a subpoena.

Also, “the ACLU produced three witnesses—including its Executive Director—for over sixteen hours of depositions. Along the way, Mr. Depp rejected numerous compromises to minimize the burden and expense on the ACLU and its employees.” 

Had they not gotten involved with Heard's case and her promising to pay them $3.5M but only paying them $1.3M [she even lied to them], they might not have been so upset.

The ACLU said it has given Depp all the documents he sought. Their lawyer argued “while they cannot get back the significant time they spent responding to Mr. Depp’s subpoenas and the disruption to their work,” they are “entitled” to reimbursements.

The former civil liberties organization, now an arm of the progressives, had the berries to blame Depp for dragging their butts into court when they initially refused to turn over relevant documents for the case. Depp asked a judge to compel the ACLU to respond to his request for the documents that related to Heard’s pledge from her divorce settlement from Depp to two charities: the ACLU and a children's hospital.

Heard never paid the pledge, though, and the ALCU officials ended up testifying in the trial. Now they want reimbursement for time taken to prepare and submit the documents in spite of the ordeal being entirely her fault. Had she not lied to the charities, Depp would not have any reason to prove her a liar. if anything, they should be suing her, but they know she's broke and may have lost future work as a terrible actress.

Ironically, Johnny was one who helped Heard out when she decided to not honor her pledges, at least not yet, due to the lawsuit he filed against her.

At the time, Heard said all the money would be donated by 2018. While on the stand in the ongoing trial in Virginia, a representative for the ACLU said that Heard only paid $1.3 million of the promised $3.5 million.

The American Civil Liberties Union’s general counsel, Terence Dougherty, testified that $100,000 of the $1.3 million slice came directly from Depp. The Guardian reports that, based on an email from Elon Musk, the court was told that $500,000 came from a donor-advised fund connected to Musk yet registered as a donation from Heard.

While on the stand, Amber Heard admitted she had yet to fully make the payments but said she had every intention of fulfilling her pledge. She blamed Depp and the current case but the timeline shows that her promise to pay was long before the current case was filed.

It's laughable that the ACLU acted as if they were inconvenienced and surprised that they were called to testify. They were up to their necks in the case ever since their staff help Heard write the op-ed in the Washington Post in 2018. That was the reason Depp opened a case on Heard in the first place.
ACLU refused to voluntarily hand over documents pertaining to the case, so Johnny Depp asked a judge to to legally compel them to respond ~ his motion was granted.

Now the ACLU wants Johnny Depp to reimburse them $86,253.26 for time taken preparing & submitting the docs.

Nuts. pic.twitter.com/GEt0orh3fi

— Greg Ellis 🏴‍☠️ (@ellisgreg) May 31, 2022


The ACLU admitted it helped with the op-ed on its website and that Heard pledged the donation in 2016. In 2018, the ACLU asked the less than mediocre actress to become their ambassador and was asked to work with them on the op-ed to call attention to sexual assault and domestic violence issues, having never verifying that Heard was a victim or a liar about her claim. It turns out the latter was deemed to be true by a jury.

The ACLU denies it offered the ambassadorship to Heard in exchange for her donation, but if you really believe that, I have a genuine Rolex you might want to check out.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

The losers in this case were Amber Heard and the ACLU, an organization that has become a cheap knockoff of what it once was. They used to advocate for free speech and First Amendment rights, but now they want to shut us up for saying such things as 'a man is a man and a woman is a woman.' Now they get involved in political issues and clearly take sides. 

Why did they write the op-ed for Heard in the first place? It was their idea to do that, not Heard's. For the ACLU to try squeezing Johnny Depp for money should tell you who they are and to show Amber Heard as an angry, probably borderline woman with little to no acting ability, try as she did.


Thursday, June 2, 2022

Michael Avenatti will never be POTUS because he's going to do a 4-year bid for fraud


Former CNN presidential hopeful, Michael Avenatti, will never be President of the United States and Brian Stelter, along with the entire cast of the Comedy News Network, is sad to hear that Mike, as they called him, will be doing a 4-year bid in the joint. "At least that's one less than a nickel," Wolf Blitzer opined.

Disgraced lawyer lost his case for cheating his former client, sex performer Stormy Daniels, [aka Stephanie Gregory Clifford] out of $300,000. He was convicted of aggravated identity fraud and wire fraud in New York federal court earlier in the year and faced up to two years in prison for the first rap and 20 big ones for the second.

Thirty months will be served concurrently with the  two-and-a-half-year sentence sentence he was previously handed down in a case in which he tried to extort  the Nike Corp. out of $25,000,000. If he's smart, [doubtful] he'll be a sucker ducker in the joint and avoid the spider monkeys, if you know what I mean. 

Avenatti spoke after the sentencing and acknowledged the "series of mistakes" and "poor judgment" he made but never once mentioned CNN and his feelings for Brian Stelter.

"I will forever be branded ‘disgraced lawyer’ and worse," he said. [The 'worse' might be, for example: a-hole, scumcrumpet, slime-ball, and general turd.]

Ahead of sentencing, Avenatti had sent a letter apologizing to Daniels, but the judge said this gesture was "too little, too late." He did not send pictures of his genitalia nor did he ask her for one last chance.

Avenatti requested to be sentenced remotely but judge Furman denied the request, ordering him to appear.

"In the Court’s view, the gravity and significance of the sentencing proceeding would be ill served by a remote proceeding," Furman wrote.

For her part, Daniels took delight in the ruling, tweeting, ""See ya there, b--ch!... except I'm flying in first class. Buwahaha."

Avenatti rose to fame as the attorney for Daniels when she was trying to get out of an October 2016 agreement where she received $130,000 in exchange for her silence regarding her claim that she had an affair with former President Donald Trump in 2006. Trump has denied that the affair took place but who cares anyway? He's Trump and he does Trump things.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Avenatti has an upcoming retrial in California federal court in a separate case in which he is accused of stealing nearly $10 million from five clients. A judge declared a mistrial in the first trial last August after prosecutors failed to turn over relevant financial evidence.

Keep your schadenfreude fingers crossed.

Joe tells US Naval Academy grads about his time as "Top Gun"


Annapolis, MD -- President Joseph Robinette Biden spoke to the US Naval Academy graduating class of 2022 on Wednesday and reminisced about his time at the Naval Academy where he graduated first in his class of midshipmen and went on to become a naval aviator. But not just a run-of-the-mill flyboy, but Top Gun.

"It was hard. Very hard, but I worked harder than the rest of my patriotic aviators and got into the Top Gun program in California, I believe. We flew, we drank and we made love to hot women we met at a bar. This was before I met Jill, of course. There's nobody hotter than Jill, and she's a doctor. When we make love, she makes me call her "Doctor Jill" and she calls my "Mister Vice President.

"Flying Top Gun was no picnic, but sometimes on nice days the guys would get together and actually have a picnic; I'm serious. We didn't have any women in the program when I flew, and there were no gays or transgender aviators. Just a bunch of two-fisted, tough-as-nails jet jockeys. I mean it.

"So we were assigned to fly a secret mission--I wish I could tell you about it but then I'd have to kill you.

"The admiral told us we might not come back home to the hot chicks at the bar or our wives or both. I'm not lying. 


"The problem was, the admiral couldn't speak--he had to type out the words he couldn't say into a machine, which I read and came to understand that this was 'goodbye' to my best friend, Icepack.

"The mission was to destroy an underground nuclear facility located in a canyon that we'd have to fly low into and laser-paint the sucker and follow up with a bomb to destroy the joint. I won't tell you where that facility was located, but I can tell you these were bad dudes who liked to sing 'Death to America. Death to Israel.'

"My call sign was "Brett Maverick" and I was assigned to follow up "Hummingbird" who would laser-paint the target and I would bomb the crap out of it, good Lord willing.

"My wingman was a dude whose call sign was 'Cornpop.' Bravest flyboy I ever knew, and we got in there like bats out of hell and did what America said we had to do.

Brett Maverick and Cornpop


"As we pulled back hard on our sticks to get over the mountain, Cornpop blacked out from the high gees and I knew I had to think quick. His F-19 was plummeting to Mother Earth faster than a speeding bullet, so I got my bird under his bird and used my thrust to shove his bird back up before disaster struck.

"We just made it. 

"Sadly, Cornpop is no longer with us. He's in the Big Airport in the sky.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

"I'm not gonna stand here and tell you graduates of this fine academy what the outcome was, but look around you and remember, we didn't go to war with that country whose name rhymes with dustpan.

"So get outta here and make America proud. Make your parents proud. And most of all, make me proud. Cornpop would've wanted that.

"God bless you. God bless me. God bless the US Navy."

And then President Biden was escorted off the stage.


Wednesday, June 1, 2022

Uvalde PD stop cooperating with state amid words that make them feel unsafe




The Uvalde, Texas police department and local school district police have stopped cooperating with the Department of Safety investigation as they are feeling "unsafe" with the words being used to describe their behavior during the massacre that killed 19 children and two teachers at the Robb Elementary School. Their lack of cooperation is not surprising as we have witnessed their lack of action against the now-dead shooter, an 18-year-old mentally ill man.

"It was scary," a cop who wished to remain anonymous to avoid dangerous, scary criticism said. "I was hoping he would run out of ammo and then we'd charge him, but he was well prepared and we used strategic patience, like Barack Obama used. It didn't work out very well for all parties."

The Uvalde Police Department and Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District police force stopped cooperating Friday after they were criticized at a press conference, which made them feel unsafe and forced them to retreat to their "safe spaces."

 Steven McCraw, the head of the Texas Department of Public Safety, said the police made the "wrong decision" when they stayed a safe distance from the danger in order to go home to their wives and kids or just dogs and cats, depending upon who you asked. 

Peter Arredondo, the Uvalde school district police chief, has stayed out of sight and not responded to Texas Rangers for two days for a follow-up interview after having made initial statements following the shooting. 

Arredondo made the decision to not immediately confront the shooter at the school during his rampage last week because it was too dangerous. The "bravest" waited in a school hallway for almost 50 minutes. Fifty freaking minutes! Children were being shot and these cowards did nothing to stop him for 50 minutes.

McCraw said that Arredondo believed the situation had changed from active shooter to barricaded shooter, in spite of 911 calls coming from children inside the classroom. In spite of the training the cops received only 8 weeks prior to the rampage that clearly directs law enforcement to waste no time and confront the threat immediately once the location is known.

Then the cops didn't have a key to open the door and they worried that they might get cut if they came in through a window or perhaps have to pay for the door if they broke it down.

The entire incident was a clusterfrack of misinformation, cowardice, bad decisions, and lies. Nineteen children and two teachers were killed by this mentally ill person and the signs were there that he had a problem.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Meanwhile the left used the opportunity to 'never let a crisis go to waste' and called for more gun control, as if that would have prevented this incident. 

Locked doors with only one school entrance, armed and trained school staff, metal detectors, faster, braver police response, and improved reporting of mental health issues, especially after threats are made, would have likely prevented this from happening, at least to the horrible degree that it did. 



Fauci's top advisor indicted as 'co-conspiritor' in huge COVID cover-up

The United States Department of Justice dropped a bombshell on Tuesday, announcing that Dr. Richard Morens, one of Dr. Anthony Fauci's m...