Fredo calls Marco Rubio "Mr. Bible Boy"

Chris Cuomo

Compromised News Network host Chris "Fredo" Cuomo made fun of  Sen. Marco Rubio’s faith on Monday, calling him "Mr. Bible Boy." Not only is Fredo rude and irreverent, he's now tied with his brother Andrew for the dumbest brother competition.

Calling a grown man "boy," is racist.  Calling Chrissy Cuomo "Fredo" is simply what he deserves because he's a fool.

Seriously, how can CNN be considered a news source? The entire network is opinion, based on their leftist interpretation of events.

Fredo said of Rubio that  "he’s got a Bible quote for every moment, he just never speaks truth to power or acts on any of it."

Marco Rubio and family

Fredo and his fellow co-host Don Lemon, [pronounced "Lay Monn"] are both laughingly labeled as news anchors while their opinions heavily defend the left and attack Republicans.

Monday was no different, as Lemon moved his wedding ring to his pinky, [he is married to Mr. Tim Malone] and attempted to impersonate a combination of President Trump and a stereotypical mob boss to mock the recently leaked phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.

What a knee-slapper!

Lemon then dropped the faux accent and because he went up against President Trump in the phone conversation,  praised Raffensperger as a "man of faith."

Le Monn doesn't know that Raffensperger is a man of faith anymore than Fredo knows addition and subtraction. Both of these clowns are despicable.

Squatting Fredo in his home gym 

But at least Fredo works out--he makes sure everyone knows that he's buffed, because that's all Mr. Dumbell Boy has got.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Kamala Harris does a 'Joe Biden' in interview about "Fweedom"

In an interview with Elle magazine Monday, Vice President-elect Kamala Harris (D) fabricated a story about her tough days as a California toddler of color. Her story may have been inspired by the tales told by her running mate, Joseph Robinette Biden, when he spoke of Cornpop and the hair on his legs.

Harris' story was basically the same one told in an interview by Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. that he gave to Playboy magazine in 1965.

“Senator Kamala Harris started her life’s work young,” Elle's suck-up, fawning profile began.“She laughs from her gut, the way you would with family, as she remembers being wheeled through an Oakland, California, civil rights march in a stroller with no straps with her parents and her uncle. At some point, she fell from the stroller (few safety regulations existed for children’s equipment back then), and the adults, caught up in the rapture of protest, just kept on marching. By the time they noticed little Kamala was gone and doubled back, she was understandably upset. ‘My mother tells the story about how I’m fussing’ Harris says, ‘and she’s like, ‘Baby, what do you want? What do you need?’ And I just looked at her and I said, ‘Fweedom.””

And if you believe that balderdash, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

After the interview became public on Twitter, Andray Domise, a contributing editor to Maclean's, revealed the stark similarity of Harris' tale to a story told by Rev. King in the Playboy interview.

In that interview with Alex Haley, King responded to a question regarding the difficulties of leading the Civil Rights movement. He spoke about the suffering for the cause and how he was inspired by a story he heard about a little girl.

During an interview with Alex Haley, King answered a question about the burdens of being the leader of the Civil Rights movement. Describing his suffering for the cause, he referenced the inspiration he received from a story he had heard about a little girl:

I never will forget a moment in Birmingham when a white policeman accosted a little Negro girl, seven or eight years old, who was walking in a demonstration with her mother. “What do you want?” the policeman asked her gruffly, and the little girl looked him straight in the eye and answered, “Fee-dom.” She couldn’t even pronounce it, but she knew. It was beautiful! Many times when I have been in sorely trying situations, the memory of that little one has come into my mind, and has buoyed me.

Do you see a similarity between Rev. King's story and the irreverent Harris' story? If not, I can get you a really good deal on that bridge I mentioned.

So it turns out Kamala Harris lifted her "Fweedom" story from a 1965 Playboy interview with Martin Luther King, by Alex Haley. Much thanks to @EngelsFreddie for spotting the similarityhttps://t.co/zDONW4Ueqs pic.twitter.com/yQuWZHYEMz

— Q. Anthony (ɔpɛ asem) (@andraydomise)

Harris is shameless when it comes to telling tales about her and her struggles in the Civil Rights movement, even going so far as to attack her now running mate, Joe Biden, during the Democratic primary race. 

Referencing Biden’s willingness to work with notoriously segregationist former Sens. James O. Eastland of Mississippi and Herman Talmadge of Georgia, Harris said, “It was not only that, but you also worked with them to oppose busing. There was a little girl in California who was part of the second class to integrate her public schools and she was bused to school every day.”

“That little girl was me,” Harris added.

No, she wasn't that little girl forced on the school bus--that was a lie. And when she was asked about that statement in subsequent interview, Harris laughed from her gut, the way you would with family, or when you're nervous, and simply said, "It was a debate . . . it was a debate."

If you don't believe the media helped Biden and Harris win this election, the price just went down on that bridge in Brooklyn. It's a great opportunity.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Eric Swalwell attacks GOP Senators with Chinese proverbs he learned somewhere

Ted Cruz (R-TX) along with about eleven additional Republicans, will join with Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) as well as dozens of House members in objecting the electoral outcome of the presidential election scheduled for January 6.  

It's highly likely that Joe Biden will be sworn in on January 20th, but there is nothing illegal or unusual about the plans these Congress members have, and they have every right to go forward with this plan.

In spite of the fact that Democrats have done exactly the same thing by disputing past elections numerous times, some of them are attacking the GOP members who are initiating the move. 

Eric Swalwell (D-CA) is one such silly guy. You know Swalwell--he's the guy who let 'er rip on live TV.

However, instead of coming out directly against the Republicans involved in the plan, Swalwell has decided to take a different tact--he will be slinging Chinese proverbs in the hope of getting Republicans to reconsider what they plan to do.

The now bearded Senator went on the Comedy News Network and spoke with host Brian Stelter, who is not gay. "A bird does not sing because it has an answer; it sings because it has a song," Swalwell said as his eyes looked upward at the studio ceiling.

"That is quite profound," Stelter softly responded. "What exactly do you mean?"

"The Republicans, like Donald Trump, refuse to their fate. I'm saying the election outcome is the song and Trump doesn't know the words. But remember, Brian, a needle is not sharp at both ends."

"Wow."

"And talk does not cook the rice," Stalwell strangely added.

"How do you know of such things?" Stelter asked.

"I once knew a beautiful young lady from the Asian continent. She knew of many things and taught them to me. Some of those things have helped me with my marriage, and others have helped me with my campaigns."

"Have Trump supporters attacked you on your anti-Trump rhetoric?" Stelter asked the sage.

"Yes," Swalwell replied, a strange sound emanating from somewhere below the tabletop. "But Brian, only one who can swallow an insult is a man. And remember, even a hare will bite when it is cornered, so I warn them to tread lightly with their insults."

"Again, words of wisdom. Do you think one day that you'll run for Biden's position?"

"Distant water does not put out a nearby fire, Brian. I say, better the cottage where one is merry than the palace where one weeps."

"Well, that's all the time we have, Eric. Thanks for coming."

"And I just want to add, that I owe much of my success to Fang Fang and hope she'll return to work with me and the party some day."

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver concludes prayer with a display of his woke cluelessness

A Democrat in Congress on Sunday showed us how stupid, albeit woke, he is. In his opening prayer for the 117th Congress, he concluded with the phrase, "Amen and Awoman," proving his lack of knowledge regarding the words that come out of his mouth.

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D) led the opening prayer. He is also a pastor at St. James United Methodist Church of Kansas City, Missouri, which should be a cause for embarrassment to anyone attending his church.

Cleaver's prayer to “The God known by many names and faith,” concluded with, “Amen and Awomen,” obviously, and ignorantly, ascribing gender to the traditional “Amen” conclusion of a prayer.

The word Amen comes from the Greek and Hebrew and is used by Christians and Jews in prayer. 

Amen means “truly” or “it is so” and has nothing to do with gender. It isn't a man, or men, but is more like, "Yep, that's the truth." Any pastor should know that, and if he or she actually did but used it in a gendered way, should be ashamed to call him- or herself a pastor, much less a Christian or Jew.

Reverend Rep. Cleaver also shared a video of his prayer on social media which, due to his lack of knowledge, did not embarrass him.

I was honored to deliver the opening prayer for the 117th Congress. May God bless each and every Representative with the courage and wisdom to defend our democracy and the liberties we all hold so dearly. https://t.co/z3vkWOk7lc

— Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (@repcleaver) January 3, 2021

Seriously, the guy is a dummy, and some ridiculed him on social media:

.How dumb are these people?
They think ”amen” is a gendered word.
“Amen and Awomen." pic.twitter.com/pweNiIiQA5
— Breanna Morello 🇺🇸 (@breannamorello) January 3, 2021

 ComedianLarry the Cable guy weighed in on the blatant stupidity.

Congress today did a prayer and finished it with “amen” AND “a woman” to be gender equal. Are they really that dumb. Amen is Latin/Hebrew for “Truly” or “So be it”? It has nothing to do with Gender. These people are complete idiots. Ex: “God is great.” “Amen” (truly) duh!

— Larry The Cable Guy (@GitRDoneLarry) January 3, 2021

The Democrats are losing their collective mind over wokeness to the point where we may need to start changing or adding words:

menstruation becomes womenstruation

meningitis becomes womangitis 

menses becomes womanses

manual labor becomes womanual labor

manuscript becomes womanuscript

Manhattan becomes Womanhattan

It makes just as much sense to make these changes as to what Cleaver did with the word Amen.

Seriously, liberalism is a mental disorder.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Alyssa Milano supports alleged domestic abuser Warnock

Alyssa Milano, is a #MeToo advocate, which is a person who supports women who have been raped or otherwise assaulted by men. The movement came about the same time as #BelieveAllWomen came into being which resulted from empty claims of sexual misconduct against now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

But like many leftists, Milano only tends to believe and support those who have the same political beliefs as hers. So it should come as no surprise that Milano supports Rev. Raphael Warnock, the Democratic senate contender from Georgia, in spite of recent allegations made by Oulèye Ndoye, the very Rev. Warnock's wife that he's an abuser. After an argument, Ndoye said that he ran over her foot with the car but he denies that.

Believe all women, unless they're causing problems in the Democratic Party. Then do what you have to do to shut them up.

Although Milano was a self-proclaimed spokesperson in the #MeToo movement, many are saying that her morals waver when it comes to Warnock. 

In 2018 at the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, she was wildly critical of Kavanaugh and accepted all the empty allegations leveled at him without question. At the trial she wore a sash that read: "BELIEVE WOMEN" and sat behind Kavanaugh while holding up a booklet that read: "I BELIEVE SURVIVORS."

Then she lied to The Hollywood Reporter about her motivation for attending the confirmation hearings saying, "I wasn't there with any political agenda. I was there to support a survivor of sexual assault. As a survivor, it literally is all of our worst nightmares come true. This is exactly the reason why we don't come forward, or we don't report. Because of the scrutiny. Because a man's word will always mean more than our word. And it's disgusting."

Enter Warnock. 

Now Milano is raising money for the Democratic Senate candidate and seems to have forgotten where she stands for women.

Regarding the incident in which Warnock allegedly ran over his wife's foot during a domestic inciden, police responded to it and body cam footage shows the aftermath of a verbal altercation between them.

The couple got divorced in November 2019.

Ndoye told police in that interview: "This man's running for the United States Senate and all he cares about right now is his reputation. I work at the mayor's office and this is a big problem. I've been trying to be very quiet about the way he is for the sake of my kids and his reputation.

"I've tried to keep the way that he acts under wraps for a long time and today he crossed the line," she continued. "So that is what is going on here and he's a great actor. He is phenomenal at putting on a really good show."

While Ndoye said Warnock ran over her foot, medical examiners found no physical damage.

In another incident in 2002, Warnock  "repeatedly disrupted a 2002 police investigation into child abuse at a church-affiliated summer camp, interfering with interviews and discouraging counselors from speaking with investigators," according to two Maryland State Police reports obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

But Milano stands by her man on the left. She is proudly supporting the extremely Rev. Warnock, working the phone banks, giving him praise, taking out the trash. She is also in the bag for Jon Ossoff, another Democratic Senate candidate who is also far Left.

Some online commentators pointed out the hypocrisy of Milano raising money for someone who has accusations against him by his ex-wife.

One Twitter used asked, "Where's the Me too movement now?"

Another wrote, "Do you see a hypocrite when you look in the mirror @Alyssa_Milano Asking for a friend #metoo #timesup." The reply included a Rose McGowan tweet, where the actress torched Milano and called her a "fraud" for her silence about the sexual accusations against Joe Biden by former Senate staffer Tara Reade.

"You are a fraud. This is about holding the media accountable. You go after Trump & [Supreme Court Justice Brett] Kavanaugh saying Believe Victims, you are a lie. You have always been a lie. The corrupt DNC is in on the smear job of Tara Reade, so are you. SHAME," McGowan wrote in April.

The hypocrisy is so thick, you can cut it with a tweet.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Portland Mayor Wheeler removes head from nether regions and has an epiphany about Antifa

Portland, Oregon Mayor Ted "The Head" Wheeler (D-of course) finally realized you can't make nicey-nice to an alligator and expect it not to eat you. He now understands that antifa and other anarchists do what they do because they like it.

Wheeler finally removed his head from his nether regions and condemned antifa after yet another looting and riot spree on New Year's Eve. He's a slow learner and we cannot even be certain that he has actually learned from the past.

The far-Left Mayor spoke at a press conference New Year's Day and said protesters caused tens of thousands of dollars in damage. They broke windows, started fires and spray-painted private businesses in the downtown area of the city late Thursday night.

Wheeler proved his level of stupidity and incompetence by asking during his press conference, “Why would a group of largely white, young and some middle-age men destroy the livelihood of others who are struggling to get by?”

Answer: because it's fun and it's how they roll. They don't need a good reason, they simply need a reason, Teddy, you moron.

Law enforcement said that some of the protesters threw Molotov cocktails Thursday night and caused thousands of dollars in property damage in the downtown area.

Wheeler spoke with Multnomah County DA Mike Schmidt [not the former baseball great] and finally called for more prosecutions and accountability for "radical antifa and anarchists" seeking to cause damage and wreak havoc in the city. The violent protests have been going on for scores of nights in 2020.

“My good faith efforts at de-escalation have been met with ongoing violence and even scorn from radical antifa and anarchists,” Wheeler naively said. “In response, it will be necessary to use additional tools and to push the limits of the tools we already have to bring the criminal destruction and violence to an end.”

Tools? Hahahaha. No, seriously . . . hahahahaha. With Trump leaving office, they are running out of excuses for the anarchy.

Wheeler committed to three counter-approaches for handling violent protesters in the city, including asking federal, state, county and local law enforcement "to convene to deal with anarchist violence as soon as possible."

He finally called on the state legislature to increase penalties for repeat offenders, adding that he believes people who are convicted of criminal destruction should be "required to meet with those whose businesses they damaged." 

But will they be allowed to walk out of court, bail-free? Kamala Harris thinks they should, and so do many, many leftists. 

In 2020, Wheeler did all but French kiss BLM leaders and antifa thugs while President Trump urged him to call in federal troops to quell the violence. Wheeler did nothing and his lack of initiative emboldened them even more. With Trump leaving office, the Democrats are going to have to do something, which is not how they roll.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Rob Reiner says GOP lawmakers challenging election will be "committing sedition and treason"

Leftist Hollywood dolt who got his start playing in "All in the Family" as Archie Bunker's son-in-law referred to as "Meathead," has finally perfected that role. Reiner is attacking GOP lawmakers for doing the exact same thing Democrats have done a number of times in the past, starting in 1969 when both they and the Republicans wanted to get rid of the electoral college.

Now Meathead is attacking the Republicans who plan to challenge the electoral college results and is accusing them of committing "sedition and treason."

Sedition is defined as "conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarchy." 

Treason is "the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign of overthrow the government."

Sorry, I don't see it. Neither definition applies to the notion of challenging or questioning the results of the electoral college. The Republicans are not trying to overthrow the country or betray it. They don't want to kill President-elect Joseph Robinette Biden--he will likely be leaving office before finishing his first term if his mental capacity continues its spiral down at the same rate it appears to be going. All the Republicans want to do is to take a good, hard look at how the election turned out the way it did.

Meathead has constantly called Trump a Russian asset, a claim that has been disproved and should embarrass anyone who continues to make it. But meatheads don't embarrass easily, I suppose.

“Every Senator and Congressperson who votes to overturn the election will be committing an act of Sedition and Treason. Their names will be recorded for history,” Reiner wrote.

Funny, Reiner and the Democrats didn't oppose it when members of their Party did the same thing in the past. In fact, the prior three times a Republican was elected president [Trump in 2016, and George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004], House Democrats' heads exploded and they objected to the electoral votes in states Republicans won.

 In early 2005 specifically, Sen. Barbara Boxer, (D-CA), along with Rep. Stephanie Tubbs (D-OH), objected to Bush's 2004 electoral votes in Ohio. 

Thus, the chambers were forced to leave their joint session and debate separately for two hours on whether to reject Ohio's electoral votes. Neither did, but the objection by Boxer and Tubbs serves as a modern precedent for what is likely to happen in Congress on Jan. 6 and the blatant hypocrisy on the part of the Democrats where some praised Boxer's move including Sen Dick Durbin (D-IL) on the Senate floor:

"Some may criticize our colleague from California for bringing us here for this brief debate. I thank her for doing that because it gives members an opportunity once again on a bipartisan basis to look at a challenge that we face not just in the last election in one State but in many States."

But who went hard on Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) for challenging the electoral college results:

"The political equivalent of barking at the moon. This won’t be taken seriously, nor should it be. The American people made a decision on Nov. 3rd and that decision must and will be honored and protected by the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives."

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) is another hypocrite who previously praised Boxer:

"I believe that Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH) have performed a very valuable public service in bringing this debate before the Congress. As Americans, we should all be troubled by reports of voting problems in many parts of the country," Van Hollen, who was then a House member, said in a press release. "I have been particularly concerned about the lack of a verifiable paper record in connection with electronic voting systems. I am proud to be a co-sponsor of legislation to solve that problem."

House Speaker Nancy "Frenetic Paws" Pelosi (D-CA), made similar comments at a Wednesday press conference.:

"I have no doubt that on next Wednesday, a week from today, that Joe Biden will be confirmed by the acceptance of the vote of the Electoral College as the 46th president of the United States," she said.

But in 2005 on the House floor Pelosi said lauded Boxer's challenge. 

"Today we are witnessing Democracy at work. This isn't as some of our Republican colleagues have referred to it, sadly, as frivolous. This debate is fundamental to our democracy," she said at the time. "The representatives of the American people in this house are standing up for three fundamental American beliefs: The right to vote is sacred; that a representative has a duty to represent his or her constituents; and that the rule of law is the hallmark of our nation."

Pelosi, however, made clear that "under the rule of law today this House will accept the election of President Bush and Vice President Cheney. ... There is absolutely no question about that. This isn't about in any way rejecting that outcome. ... It is instead to discuss the real problems with our electoral system."

Back to Meathead Reiner--he tweeted:

Every Senator and Congressperson who votes to overturn the election will be committing an act of Sedition and Treason. Their names will be recorded for history.

— Rob Reiner (@robreiner) January 2, 2021

Yes, whenever a Congressman votes, their votes are recorded for history; Reiner got that one correct. The treason and sedition part, not so much. Leftists like to think that whenever someone disagrees with what they want, those people are committing some crime against the country. 

Except when their side does the same thing.

A number of Republicans in the Senate and House plan to challenge the electoral college results on January 6th. They cite allegations of voter fraud, poor enforcement of voting laws, as well as other irregularities in the election.

At least 140 House Republicans are expected to join the effort to challenge the results, Breitbart News reported.

Reiner’s claim that GOP lawmakers will be committing “sedition and treason” is stupid and has no basis in law. 

Was it not sedition and treason four years ago when several House Democrats objected to the electoral college results of Trump’s 2016 presidential victory?

Rob Meathead Reiner has made numerous and unfounded accusations against President Trump, calling him a murderer and a white supremacist on social media. The man has no credibility.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

 

Before the facts are known, Ilhan Omar blames cops for shooting black man cops say shot first

Minneapolis -- Rep. Ilhan Omar's (D-MN) default button is to blame the cops or white people in general whenever there is an incident involving them and people of color or people who share her Islamic background.

Minneapolis police shot and killed 23-year-old Dolal Idd on Wednesday according to ABC News. The incident occurred in the same neighborhood were George Floyd died at the hands of police and people are looking for answers. Apparently, Omar already "knows" the reason for the shooting and puts the blame fully on the police in spite of her not being there or seeing the evidence for what happened.

Omar called the shooting a "state sanctioned murder."

"A man was killed, his family terrorized & robbed of a son and all they are left w/ is more questions than answers," the Minnesota congresswoman who married her own brother tweeted. "Let's stop normalizing + justifying state sanctioned murder by those who take an oath to uphold the law."

Normalizing? How in the world did Omar come up with that thought? Anytime a person of color is killed by police, whether that person poses a physical threat or not, the leftist media is all over it.

Justifying? Yes, if a person is about to attack a cop with a weapon and the cop's life is in danger, he or she has the right to defend themselves. 

Police had body cam on and you can see what happened below. Caution, violent content:

It seems clear that Idd fired first but to Omar and her ilk, that doesn't matter.

According to Minneapolis law enforcement, who have since released brief footage from one of the officers involved in the fatal shooting, police officers only shot and killed Idd after he fired on officers first.

The reason the cops stopped Idd was because he was a suspect in a felony gun investigation. You would think leftists who oppose gun ownership would certainly have been on board with stopping someone for illegal guns. And after the incident, a gun was found in the car.

Police Chief Medaria Arradondo said that officers on the scene, nearby witnesses, and the released body cam footage confirm that Idd shot first. 

What would Omar have the police do? Leave the guy alone? Perhaps she would suggest that a social worker would have done a better job by talking to the man to get him to stop shooting at them.

"When I viewed the video that everyone else is viewing... it appears that the individual inside the vehicle fired his weapon at the vehicle first," Arradondo said, according to ABC News.

Still, Idd's family is demanding answers. I suggest they look at the video.

The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension is heading up the investigation into the incident.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet