New video shows 'un-Islamic' ISIS executing 5 "spies"

ISIS just circulated a video supposedly showing them execute five men who they accuse of spying for Syria and Britain. The video shows the men "confessing" to filming and taking photos of sites within Raqqa, the self-declared caliphate led by that PhD in Islamic studies we have come to know as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. He definitely doesn't know Islam.

The video cannot be verified but in the past, they usually turn out to be the real thing.

The so-called traitors in the video spoke Arabic and are represented as "the enemy" and "apostates" by ISIS. An apostate is a person who leaves the religion of peace and then is supposed to be killed by anyone in the religion of peace who finds them. 

The five in the video are wearing what is apparently 'hand-me-down' orange jumpsuits and then they are shot in the head by masked Muslim executioners.

One of the executioners spoke before killing his victim. He mocked British Prime Minister David Cameron and refers to the men they were about to kill as "spies." He goes on to say that ISIS will one day invade Britain and impose their version of Islamic law known as Sharia.

David Cameron had no comment other than to say that Islam is a peaceful religion. They only talk of love for thy neighbour (he spells 'neighbor' with an extra vowel) and how ISIS is not Islamic, nor is it a state, and those Muslim jihadists who are following the literal teachings of the Koran are not Muslim and should be ashamed of themselves for taking the "Noble Koran" so seriously.

Okay, Cameron didn't really say all of that this time, but he was thinking it. That is because David Cameron is a dhimmie and a fool.


Tweet

Terrorists love a borderless Europe

Liberals like to think of themselves as morally superior to conservatives. The truth is, they are overcompensating for their lacking in the reality department of life.

The Oresund bridge connects Sweden and Denmark after opening in 2000. If you want to go from one country to the other, there's no problem. Of course, there's also no problem going from one country to the other if you happen to be a migrant or a terrorist in the cause of Islam.

Sweden finally woke up and realized that the bridge supported a record flow of migrants and now, starting tomorrow, there will be new travel restrictions to stem the flow. After a year of terrorism and migration all throughout Europe, borders are making a comeback. Liberals are at a loss of what to do. 

No longer will people be able to go from one country to another without ever having to produce your passport. Europe is going back to borders and sovereignty. 

How very conservative. 

Sweden wants to prevent undocumented (read "illegal") migrants from entering their country, now that 160,000 asylum-seekers stormed in last year. Many of them were from Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, and the majority of them were young men. They could have stayed back and fought ISIS and the Taliban, but immigration jihad is so much safer.

Finally, border checks are being performed in Germany, France, Belgium, Austria and in other countries that what was touted to be a passport-free, 26 country travel zone.

Due to the inability of liberals to ever admit they are wrong, the move is slated to be temporary. But if the inevitability of migrants and terrorist immigration continues, as it likely will, the move will be extended. 

Some European nations have suspended EU rules as they've experienced problems with security, terrorism and public order. "It's basically every country for itself now," said EU expert, Mark Rhinard of the Swedish Institute of International Affairs.

Shades of Angela Merkel.

About one million migrants crossed the Mediterranean last year. Both Sweden and Germany welcomed them with open arms and open wallets. Hungary built a fence to keep them out--the Mexicans didn't pay for it. 

The Danish government threatened migrants that they would confiscate their jewelry to cover their expenses--the migrants didn't want to have to pay their way so they largely avoided Denmark, their jewelry intact.

There were EU rules requiring migrants seek shelter in the first EU country they enter. Greece and Italy were inundated by sea arrivals and other northern countries allowed migrants to continue on to their intended destinations, as long as the destination was elsewhere. 

The EU worked to evenly spread out the refugees across the bloc, but it met with stiff resistance from its member states and only 150 of the 160,000 had been relocated from Italy and Greece. 

They were stuck with them like a community organizer seeks to stick our nation with the same problem. Not only will jobs be taken from legal immigrants and others, we are inviting unvetted people into the country and ISIS said that they will be among them.

How very liberal.



Tweet

Trump and 8 additional jihadist recruitment tools

Taking their cue from Hillary Clinton, an Al Qaeda-linked terrorist group in Somalia released a recruitment video Friday, allegedly featuring Donald Trump as a reason to wage jihad on the United States. Of course, the video also had a guest appearance by Hillary, but that's not newsworthy to her.

It may be true that ISIS and other Islamic terrorist groups use people like Trump and the Clintons for the recruitment of jihadists, but let's face it, there are other reasons for Islamic terrorists to wage war against us, and these things can be just as powerful in the recruitment process as Donald Trump saying that we should not allow more Muslims into the US. 

Some of the reasons they hate us and would use as a recruitment tool to wage jihad against us are:

(1) We like music and we like to dance. Islam forbids both, which is why many Muslims hate the Sufi version of Islam--they pray through music and dancing a whirling dervish.

(2) Our women can vote, go to school, drive cars, leave home without a male chaperon, have their face showing, and have opinions that differ from those of their husband. Muslim women are often less valued than the cattle their husband owns and does with what he wishes. They are also made to wear cloth coffins in sweltering hot countries where Islam is practiced in a more literal manner.

(3) We support Israel (except for the left and Obama, who sides with Islamic nations like Iran). Islam hates Israel only for one reason--it's where the Jews are. They are taught as children to hate Jews. It's in the Koran, their "holy" scripture.

(4) We support our Constitution, an incredible legal document that gives equal rights to all people without any basis on their religious beliefs. Muslims can often be seen at Islamic rallies holding up signs that say "Democracy can go to hell."

(5) We support same-sex marriage. They kill gays, lesbians, transsexuals, and so on, but it's okay for Muslims to have sex with young boys made to look like girls. Being made up like a girl means it isn't homosexual to their way of thinking.

(6) We freed the slaves. Islam breeds the slaves. Throughout the world, slavery is still being practiced by Muslims.

(7) We don't allow for female genital mutilation (FGM) and our women appreciate that very much. Islamic nations perform FGM on their young girls. They hate the idea that women should also be allowed to enjoy sexual intercourse and part of the fear comes from their own insecurity about their performance. 

(8) Bill Clinton: he is hated by religious Muslims because of his extramarital affairs. In general, Muslims only have sex with any one of their 4 wives, slaves, or muta marriage partner. For more on these temporary marriages, not dissimilar to Islamic prostitution, see the video (above)--it's not a joke.

So claiming that Donald Trump is ISIS's best recruiting tool is not only stupid on Hillary's part, it's hypocritical. 

Tweet

Anti-Muslim fire set by um, a Muslim

A little mosque on the Houston, Texas prairie was set on fire on the day celebrating the birth of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. 

Yes, Christmas Day. A fire was set at a storefront mosque and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) was quick to "jump-the-sword" by blaming it on "anti-Muslim sentiment." I still wonder what kind of "relations" Islam really wants to have with America.

Unfortunately for the CAIR script (that never changes) it was discovered that the fire was actually set by a fellow Muslim who attends the mosque--a 37-year-old guy named Gary Nathaniel Moore. He was arrested last Wednesday.

It seems that mosque-torching has become somewhat of a Christmas holiday tradition among Muslims as the same thing happened last year in Fresno, California. It's what they do to make the rest of us look bad by accusing us of the crime.

In the latest Islamic attempt of trying to blame it on the infidel, the Houston Chronicle reported that the Houston man was arrested on Christmas Day. 

Nicole Strong, a spokeswoman for the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (all but one of which Muslims, who take the Koran literally, are permitted to use for their jihad pleasure) confirmed the arrest of Moore early Wednesday after midnight. He appeared in court on Wednesday morning.

Moore had been attending the mosque for 5 years, and prayed the required 5 times a day, 7 days a week, day in and day out, rain or shine, hell or high water. He was a very very religious Muslim and has a zabiba (forehead callous caused from Islamic prayer) to prove it.

Surveillance video from multiple nearby businesses helped investigators identify the religious miscreant and a search warrant of his home was issued and conducted. A backpack with clothing that matched the suspect on the video was found along with two-packs of charcoal lighter fluid bottles that matched another lighter fluid bottle found at the scene of the fire. Probably not a coincidence.

Baadahbing!

pseudo-journalist

Reuters "journalist" Jon Herskovitz also reported on the arson, but somehow forgot to mention that Moore was a regular attendee of the mosque. If you read what Herskovitz wrote, you will not need an emetic for a week:

"Anti-Muslim sentiment has been on the rise in the United States, stoked by recent Islamic State-related attacks in France and California and anti-Muslim statements by Republican presidential hopefuls.

"The Council on American-Islamic Relations, which tracks such incidents, said the scale of vandalism, damage and intimidation at American mosques this year is the worst in the six years it has kept records." 

It's disgusting how the mainstream media refuses to report the truth.

Tweet

Muslim workers fired after walking off job

Cargill Meat Solutions in Fort Morgan, Colorado, has fired 190 Somali Muslims who walked off the job last week because the company refused to bend over backwards to accomodate their demands.

A Cargill spokesman said, "There has been a desire among some employees to go in larger groups of people to pray. We just can't accommodate that. It backs up the flow of all the production. We're a federally inspected USDA inspected plant. We have to ensure food safety. We have to ensure the products we produce meet consumer expectations."

Balderdash! Muslims believe they come first and must be accommodated before the infidel public. The company better take heed.

The truth is, prayer times in Islam are rather flexible and missed prayers can be made up later. Thus, there should be no doubt that a ploy such as this is merely an Islamic supremacist act to secure special perks for Muslims. 

If this was the first time that Muslims asked for special privileges, I wouldn't have wasted time writing about it, but it isn't. A Muslim trucker refused to deliver beer because of his religion and was awarded a ton of cash. Read about it in the PJ Media article--it's a hoot.

The bottom line is this: when our laws come in conflict with Islamic law, even when the latter allows for flexibility, it's our law that must bow toward Mecca.

One has to give Cargill some credit. They tried to resolve the dispute with the Somali demands, but in the end, the Muslims refused to bend and out they went to collect unemployment and perhaps wage legal jihad with Cargill. 

The firings of the workers came after they failed to report for work for three consecutive days last week to protest what they claimed were changes in times allowed for Muslim prayer. Remember, even Islamic scholars agree that prayer time (salat) can be flexible according to the circumstances. The workers know this but refuse to be flexible in order to show Islam's superiority over the infidel world.

Cargill said it made a "reasonable attempt" to give religious accommodation for all their employees at the Fort Morgan plant without interrupting the operations of the facility. 

"At no time did Cargill prevent people from prayer at Fort Morgan," Michael Martin, a spokesman for the company said. "Nor have we changed policies related to religious accommodation and attendance. This has been mischaracterized."

Naturally, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas-linked organization, will step in to represent the fired jihadists, in spite of the fact that their complaints with Cargill were vague and centered around space and time provided to pray. CAIR specializes in legal jihad and uses "lawfare" to get what they want.

And what they eventually want, and are willing to wait for, is a world caliphate.


Tweet

Councilman calls for pelting of cops with sticks & stones

How he wants to be seen

Jackson, Miss. -- Democratic Councilman Kenneth Stokes's website touts himself as being a man "who puts God first." It would do him well to think about how he describes himself, versus what he actually does.

Stokes told the media Thursday that police from surrounding jurisdictions put Jackson children in danger when they pursue suspects (wanted for "minor crimes") into his neighborhood.

"What I suggest is we get the black leadership together, and as these jurisdictions come into Jackson, we throw rocks and brick and bottles at them," the guy who puts God first said. He explained that it would send a stern message to police officers who want to track down young men who steal bubble gum. Really, the idiot said that--bubble gum.

Is Kenneth Stokes the stupidest Councilman ever elected to a public office? 

Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, a Republican, issued a statement denouncing Stokes' remarks. He said this on Facebook:

Mr. Stokes' remarks are reprehensible, particularly with the attack we have seen against our men and women in law enforcement. I condemn any such remarks in the strongest possible manner. This is not short of an outright assault upon all who wear the badge."

The governor plans to have Miss. Attorney General James Hood investigate as to whether the remarks constitute a criminal threat against law enforcement. 

Gee, ya think?

Stokes anemically explained his position to the Jackson-Clarion Ledger:

How he doesn't want you to see him

"My position is this: When you have these police officers coming from other jurisdictions and they will not respect human life, then I said we should use rocks, bricks or bottles to try to get the message over: stop endangering our children."

Randy Tucker, the sheriff of Madison County, warned Stokes that he and his officers will not be intimidated by Stokes. "Any Madison County law enforcement that is attacked because of your ignorant statements, I will hold you responsible," he said.

Jackson Mayor, Tony Yarber, a Democrat, agree that jurisdictional boundaries demand respect, but added that he could never condone violence against cops. He figured he leave that to Black Lives Matter.


Tweet

Crimes against Allah and the Fidels

A horrible crime was committed. A crime so heinous, so evil, so shocking that the FBI is offering a $5,000.00 reward for any information leading to the apprehension and conviction of the person who surreptitiously placed raw, dead swine in the Masjid Tawheed, a Las Vegas mosque.

So now, whatever happens in Vegas, gets punished in Vegas, if it goes against Islam.

FBI spokes-dhimmie, Barack Obama, said "We will catch the perpetrator who did this, Inshallah, and bring the infidel to justice."

Okay, so maybe Barack Hussein isn't the FBI spokes-dhimmie, per se, and maybe he didn't actually say that, but it isn't a far reach to imagine him saying something along those lines.

A surveillance camera captured the image of a bespectacled man entering the mosque and wrapping raw bacon around door handles. Bacon, as you might know, is haram, the Islamic version of non-Kosher, and is considered to be worse to Muslims than committing an honor killing of their daughter for going out with an infidel.

The FBI originally suspected, and brought in for questioning, Oscar Mayer, but the bacon magnate had a solid alibi and was released.

Seven worshipers from the mosque were slightly injured trying to escape after seeing the haram meat seductively hanging on doorknobs in their holy place of worship, and one man actually touched the meat with his unprotected, naked hand. Under Sharia law, it is possible the hand will have to be amputated--oh, wait--sorry, that's done for stealing. He gets to keep his hand but must wash it seven times for seven days at a Seven Eleven.

On a lighter note, a Muslim man of North African descent screamed "Allahu akbar" ("my god is greater") as he religiously tried to run down four military infidels with his car outside his mosque in Valencia. The imam of the mosque, Abdullah Dliouah (his friends call him "Abby Vowels") told the press that the man was known by him, but he never expressed his love for jihad prior to the attack so it came as a pleasant surprise.

Meanwhile, in Jerusalem, a teenage girl  under the influence of Palestinian TV's version of the religion of peace, was toting a knife and a Koran in her backpack. She was later arrested for attempting to kill a few Jews wherever she could find them. This was her second attempt--the first was two weeks prior to her arrest. 

No bacon was involved in the attack and fortunately, nobody was killed.

In order to assist the FBI and other law-enforcement Sharia-compliant agencies, I've created a short-list of un-Islamic activities that they should keep on the lookout for so as to prevent insulting those members of the religion of peace:

(1)  Bacon and all forms of swine, excluding ISIS, Hamas, Taliban, al-Shabab, and Al Gore.
(2)  Women not wearing cloth sacks or at minimum covering their face in public.
(3)  Dogs--Mohammad hated dogs so Muslims are supposed to hate them too (also see Jews, Christians, infidels, apostates, gays, lesbians, Hindus, Jains, and so on).
(4)  Women leaving their home without a male family member.
(5)  Making friends with un-believers--they can pretend to be friends, but only to help the cause.
(6)  Drinking alcoholic beverages--this is to be saved until getting to Paradise where rivers of wine flow like the BS from a liberal's lips.
(7)  Music that isn't about Allah or Mohammad. 
(8)  Women marrying a non-Muslim. Men are allowed to marry a non-Muslim but she must convert after the marriage.
(9)  Insulting Islam. In spite of the fact that an ideology cannot be insulted because it has no feelings, it's best for your health not to say anything even slightly negative about the religion of peace if you value yours.
(10) Having 5 wives. Only 4 wives are permitted, unless you happen to be Mohammad (peas be up in him) who had as many as 12 because he was a special case.
(11) Shaking hands with the opposite sex or being a woman alone in a room with a man.
(12) Failing to spit at a Jewish person in passing on the street.

Any one of the above un-Islamic (haram) happenstances should result in nothing less than a $5,000.00 fine and 6 months in a federal prison.

Allahu akbar, Obama.


Tweet

Muslim Brotherhood: holding the door open with its foot

There is a[n] [currently] unconstitutional bill in Congress HR 569 that addresses freedom of speech against what one thinks about Islam and Muslims. While Congress refuses to label the bill Sharia 569, that is exactly what this bill is prescribing. And while the bill will not pass at this time in America's history, it should send a clear message to the nation about the dangers of the Obama administration courting the Muslim Brotherhood.

The text of HR 569 is as follows--followed by my response:

Condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.

Whereas the victims of anti-Muslim hate crimes and rhetoric have faced physical, verbal, and emotional abuse because they were Muslim or believed to be Muslim;

[My response: The FBI statics for 2013 shows a significantly higher hate crime rate against Jews (60.3%) than that against Muslims (13.7%) from a total of 1223 victims. That translates to approximately 737 Jews versus  168 Muslims. Why isn't Congress saying anything about anti-Semitism in America?]

Whereas the constitutional rights to freedom of religions practice is a cherished United States value and violence or hate speech towards any United States community based on faith is in contravention of the Nation's founding principals;

[My response: while this is true, no religion is free to oppose the laws of the Constitution that are cherished by the United States. An example of this is clearly seen in the law that forbids multiple wives as was practiced by the Mormons and currently Muslims in Islamic countries. Violence is never accepted, but it is no more a problem for Muslims than it is for other religions, and even a bigger problem for Jews in this country.]

Whereas there are millions of Muslims in the United States, a community made up of many diverse beliefs and cultures, and both immigrants and native-born citizens;

[My response: According to Wikipedia, after all Christians, which comprise about 70% of the population, the next largest religious affiliation in the United States through identification of the religion are the Jews, ranging between 5.3 and 6.6 million (roughly 1.9%), while Islam represents 0.9% of the population. America is made up of people with diverse beliefs and cultures, but it seems that only Islam makes demands on the government that other cultures do not.]

Whereas this Muslim community is recognized as having made innumerable contributions to the cultural and economic fabric and well-being of United States society;

[My response: "Innumerable contributions?" There are no Muslim-American Nobel Prize winners, although that doesn't necessarily matter when people like Al Gore, Yassar Arafat and Barack Obama have won the Nobel Peace Prize. If you compare Nobel prizes between the Jews and Muslims in general, you will see an incredible disparity between 1.4 billion Muslims in the world--2 out of every 10 people versus 12 million Jews--2 out of every thousand people in the world. The economic fabric is another problem when you consider that Sharia law does not allow for interest to be acquired or paid by Muslims--in direct opposition to our capitalist economy that has made the average American far richer than most others in Islamic nations.]

Whereas hateful and intolerant acts against Muslims are contrary to the United States values of acceptance, welcoming, and fellowship with those of all faiths, beliefs, and cultures;

[My response: I have no problem with this except to say that most Americans with eyes and ears that see and hear are sick and tired of Muslims pretending to be the victims, even after we are attacked by jihadists. It's always the feigned fear of retribution Muslims talk about, in spite of the fact that this has never actually occurred in large scale.]

Whereas these acts affect not only the individual victims, but also their families, communities, and the entire group whose faith or beliefs were the motivation for the act; 

[My response: it sounds like HR 569 is speaking to the victims of jihad terror attacks, but they're actually speaking to the practitioners of the religion of peace; a religion whose Koran is 61% political and only 39% religious. You can open the Koran to any page and find at least one angry reference to infidels or "People of the Book," or how Allah is angry about one thing or another.]

Whereas Muslim women who wear hijabs, headscarves, or other religious articles of clothing have been disproportionately targeted because of their religious clothing, articles or observances; and

[My response: according to Islam, Muslim women are seen as inferior to men and legally, are only entitled to half of what a man receives from a parental estate. Also, the more religious the Muslim country, the fewer rights women have, including such restrictions as being forbidden to leave the home without a male chaperon; being forced to wear a burqa or other religious clothing, and being denied child custody over their husband. Men are permitted to have up to 4 wives while women are permitted one husband. The cases in which women in the West have been restricted from wearing hijabs or other so-called religious clothing, is often due to jobs where doing so would present a danger, or a particular form of dress code would forbid any clothing that doesn't comply. CAIR had sued over these issues for years. One case had to do with a woman soccer player who wanted to wear a hijab in the games. It was too dangerous and thus denied, but CAIR didn't care. There are many more examples of these ridiculous demands.]

Whereas the rise of hateful and anti-Muslim speech, violence, and cultural ignorance plays into the false narrative spread by terrorist groups of Western hatred of Islam, and can encourage certain individuals to react in extreme and violent ways;

[My response: I dare the Muslim Brotherhood give honest examples of anti-Muslim violence they speak of--instead, there are literally tens of thousands of examples of Islamic violence since 9-11. If you want to address cultural ignorance about Islam, let's talk about honor killings, jihad and the issue of Koranic abrogation, which basically discounts all the peaceful Suras in favor of the latter ones.]

Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) express its condolences for the victims of anti-Muslim hate crimes  [Me: such as???]

(2) steadfastly confirms its dedication to the rights and dignity of all its citizens of all faiths, beliefs, and cultures; [Me: name any rights we have taken from Muslims. We don't even permit ourselves to monitor what goes on in their mosques where known terrorists have 'worshipped.']

(3) denounces in the strongest terms the increase of hate speech, intimidation, violence, vandalism, arson, and other hate crimes targeted against mosques, Muslims, or those perceived to be Muslim; [Me: the problem with the notion of 'hate speech' is that it is, by definition, a thought crime and insults the Second Amendment. I hate hate speech, but I believe strongly in the Constitution and that the best way to fight 'hate speech' is with 'more speech.' It's beginning to sound like the House of Representatives is becoming increasingly more like a college campus filled with word-sensitive liberals who cannot handle anything they disagree with. Will The House soon request "safe areas" where you cannot debate them?]

(4) recognizes that the United States Muslim community has made countless positive contributions to the United States society; [Me: but CAIR, which is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, wants to "destroy" our "miserable house from within."  I'm not implying that Muslims have made no contributions to our society, but to call them countless is a bit of an exaggeration when compared to other groups of Americans. That being said, Muslims who pose no internal threat to the nation, should enjoy all the same rights of any citizen, no more, no less.]

(5) declares that the civil rights and civil liberties of all United States citizens, including Muslims in the United States, should be protected and preserved; [Me: I totally agree. I would, however, wonder how willing CAIR and other Islamic groups, would be to add the words "and Jewish" after the word "Muslim" to HR 569.]

(6) urges local and Federal law enforcement authorities to work to prevent hate crimes; and to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law those perpetrators of hate crimes; and [Me: who defines 'hate crime?' Will the definition of hate crime limit free speech? free thought? It sounds like the House of Representatives is getting its ideas from the proponents of Sharia law, a part of Islam with the goal of becoming the only law that rules the world caliphate.]

(7) reaffirms the inalienable right of every citizen to live without fear and intimidation, and to practice their freedom of faith. [Me: I would add--and to not practice any faith if they so choose. But CAIR, who obviously had a big hand in penning this crap, believes that everyone needs to be faithful to Allah, or at least pay a tax to fund wars fighting in his honor.]

It's unlikely that this will ever pass, but the mere fact that it's even being proposed should make you aware of the foot-in-the-door the Muslim Brotherhood has in our country.

Who would have guessed that it was only a little more than 14 years ago when jihadists came to our soil and killed so many, and then they called it 'the religion of peace?'  

It's called "Taqiyya." 







Tweet