"Biden’s Loan Forgiveness Fiasco: White Farmers Shafted in Race-Based Cash Grab, Whistleblower Spills"

The Biden gang got caught with their hands in the cookie jar, and this time, it’s not just crumbs. They’re dishing out straight-up racial discrimination against White farmers. 

A whistleblower from the USDA spilled the beans, and like dirty skivvies, it stinks. The Biden administration rolled out a loan forgiveness program that was basically a neon sign screaming, “No Whites allowed.” Up to 120% of farm loan debt wiped clean, but only if your skin checked the right box. Financial need? Pfft, who cares? It’s all about that diversity checklist.

The whistleblower, who’s got more guts than a slaughterhouse, told media outlet NewsNation that only minority farmers got the golden ticket. A letter from the USDA flagging their “potential eligibility as a Farm Loan Programs borrower for a payment under Section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan Act.” 

Meanwhile, white farmers got zilch. The program, tucked into the American Rescue Act, was laser-focused on “socially disadvantaged farmers” which is code for anyone who’s American Indian, Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Hispanic, or Latino. Those folks got their loans paid off, plus a sweet 20% bonus to cover taxes. White farmers? Not so much.

The whistleblower didn’t mince words: “It’s not right. It was discriminatory. Unethical. And the people who pushed it are still in charge of the agency . . .  (those) at the national office. Trump hasn’t gotten rid of them.” So, the same suits who cooked up this race-based scheme are still calling the shots, even under new management.

And here’s where it gets interesting. 

A group of White farmers, fed up with being sidelined, hauled the feds to court, arguing this program was a middle finger to the Equal Protection Clause. The judge was not having it. Slammed the gavel and called it like it is: “an actual constitutional harm that cannot be undone.” The ruling laid it bare: White farmers “will suffer the harm of being excluded from eligibility for that debt relief program solely on the basis of race,” and that’s “irreparable.” 

Then the whistleblower dropped another bomb: even after the court slapped this down, the Biden team kept the discrimination train rolling. White farmers were ghosted again, left out of notifications for a new payment and loan modification program under the Inflation Reduction Act. The USDA, under Tom Vilsack’s watch, apparently thought, “Why stop at one screw-up?” 

The whistleblower said the regime “was trying to keep this hushed because of the obvious implications of race-based loan forgiveness.” When your policy reads like a segregation playbook, you probably don’t want that on the front page. But let's remember, it was the Democrats who have historically been melanin conscious, like they were in the Civil War and held slaves.

So here we are, folks: a government program that picks winners and losers based on skin color, not merit, not need, not fairness. And the cherry on top? The masterminds behind it are still clocking in at the USDA, probably sipping Starbucks coffee and dreaming up the next way to stick it to the Constitution.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Dems Use Obese Woman to Court Male Voters

She's hot, but then again, she's always hot

After four disastrous years and a poor showing in the 2024 election, the Democratic Party is on a mission to win back male voters. However, their strategy has raised eyebrows, with many questioning how they plan to attract young men.

Young male voters, especially those under 30, are increasingly abandoning the Democratic Party. Polls reveal a widening gender gap, with men trending conservative while women continue to support Democrats. 

According to a recent Harvard Youth Poll, approval of Congressional Democrats among 18- to 29-year-olds has dropped 19 points since 2017, falling from 42 to 23 percent. Meanwhile, approval of Congressional Republicans in the same age group has increased slightly, from 28 to 29 percent. 

This is the first time in years that Republicans have surpassed Democrats in youth approval ratings.

The Left's conception of bright and beautiful

Are you Curious to know the left’s strategy to win back male voters? Hiring a female Democrat activist to attract men back to the party. While you might expect them to pick a young, attractive woman to appeal to young men, they instead chose morbidly obese left-wing content creator Olivia Julianna.

Not only is she about 500 pounds, or a quarter of a ton, but Julianna said that she has spent a lot of time on college campuses and found that young men, particularly frat boys, are almost always pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, and support Black Lives Matter.

What has she been smoking?  

“I spend a lot of time on college campuses . . . I love young men. I love frat guys, and in that, I realize, even the ones who identify as conservative are almost always pro-choice. [Yeah, sure.] Almost always pro-gay marriage. You'd be surprised at the number of them who supported Black Lives Matter. [Yes, we all would be surprised.] I feel like people kind of just lump them into this box when the truth is, again, a lot of them are with us on the issues. They're just not part of our coalition because they feel like they're not welcome," Julianna told Micah Erfan during an interview.

However, her claims are so full of crap, they would make a farmer's manure-spreader break down.

According to a Gallup poll, only 49 percent of men identify as pro-choice, with support declining further among younger age groups. Additionally, a Pew Research survey found that just 42 percent of white men support the Black Lives Matter movement, while 82 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning voters oppose it.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Alex Marlow, host of the “Alex Marlow Show,” criticized the Democrats’ strategy, saying it’s telling that they chose to feature someone “500 pounds” claiming to love frat guys to appeal to young men. He also argued that the left’s approach is ineffective and pointed out the stark contrast to when Democrats previously relied on major celebrities to promote their message.

Men tend to be attracted to women who weigh less than them and who don't lie whenever their lips move.

Tweet

Biden’s White House Clusterfrack: Secret Service Whistleblower Spills the Tea

A Secret Service whistleblower just dropped a bombshell about Joe Biden’s time in the White House, and it’s going to blow the cover of the Democratic Party.

 The Delaware Democrat’s health cover-up saga just got juicier, with whispers of a prostate cancer diagnosis swept under the rug. Biden recently admitted he’s battling stage four metastatic prostate cancer. But newsflash, that type of cancer doesn’t just sneak up on you in a few months. Chances are, he was dealing with it from day one of his so called presidency. 

But the real kicker? The whistleblower’s dish isn’t just about his physical health, it’s about Joe’s mental meltdown, which was apparently so bad he’d get lost in his own closet. Yes, according to the New York Post, Old Joe would get lost in his own closet.

A Secret Service whistleblower claims that former President Joe Biden was so out of it at the White House that he would “get lost in his closet,” Sen. Josh Hawley revealed Friday.

This isn’t merely a senior moment; it’s a full-blown scandal. Hawley is calling it one of the biggest cover-ups in presidential history, and he’s not wrong. The Democrats played hide-the-truth while Biden wandered around like a patient on the Alzheimer ward.

“This Secret Service whistleblower actually was assigned to Biden,” the Missouri Republican told Fox News host Sean Hannity.

“He told me that Biden used to get lost in his closet in the mornings at the White House,” Hawley claimed, noting that he spoke to numerous Secret Service agents while investigating the assassination attempts against President Trump.

“I mean, the guy literally stumbling around in the White House residence couldn’t find his way out of his own closet,” Hawley continued. “The president of the United States. This is outrageous. We were lied to.”

 
Lost in his closet? Come on, man! This isn’t a sitcom; it’s the White House. And it really isn't funny, or maybe it's both funny and sad.

And yet, the media clowns who propped up this circus are now peddling books with “shocking” tales of Biden’s decline—like they weren’t in on the scam from the start. They gaslit us, swore up and down Joe was sharp as a tack, while the guy was probably asking his socks for foreign policy advice.

We called it. They lied. Game over. 

So, when will Congress fire up the hearings to get to the bottom of this mess? The American people deserve answers, not more smoke and mirrors.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Calif. track & field championship has aerial banner, transgender controversy, and arrests

L. Sally Sims R. Bubbles McGirk

Males have a definite advantage over females when engaging in sports. Of course, there are going to be females who are faster and stronger than their male counterparts, but the overall picture puts males at a clear advantage.

Males have more muscle mass and strength as they have higher levels of testosterone, which promotes greater strength and muscle mass. Males have between 10 and 20 percent more muscle mass and can generate greater upper body strength.

Greater bne density and structure: Males tend to have denser and stronger bones, with larger skeletal frames, which provide better leverage and support for physical activities. This contributes to advantages in sports requiring power, such as weightlifting, tennis, throwing, or sprinting.

Height and Limb Length: Males are, on average, taller with longer limbs, which can enhance performance in sports like basketball, volleyball, or swimming, where reach and stride length are beneficial.

Cardiovascular Capacity: Males typically have larger hearts and lungs, leading to higher oxygen-carrying capacity (VO2 max), which improves endurance and performance in aerobic activities.

Body Composition: Males generally have a lower body fat percentage and higher lean muscle mass, which can enhance speed, agility, and power output in many sports.

Hormonal Factors: Testosterone not only aids muscle growth but also enhances recovery and red blood cell production, improving stamina and resilience during intense physical activity.

Average male swimmer sets records in women's competition

This is why males are the hunters and females are the smart ones.

But seriously, men and boys definitely have an advantage over females and the fact that the left refuses to acknowledge this and supports males to compete against females in sports is not only wrong, it's downright dangerous. But tell that to track and field event officials in California, and you will be told to pound sand.

Clovis, California, was a hot mess on Friday at the track and field state championship prelims, where a trans athlete competing in the girls’ category turned the event into a circus of clashing ideologies, complete with arrests and a sky-high protest banner.

 
The Clovis PD said that at least one person got hauled off in cuffs. The perp is an LGBTQ activist accused of smashing a car window with a flag pole. 

 
“This afternoon at 3:55 PM, a disturbance between two adults occurred at the intersection of Nees/Minnewawa. One adult on the sidewalk and one in a vehicle at the intersection became involved in a disturbance that turned physical. During the disturbance, one of them used pepper spray against the other. EMS was called and one of the adults was arrested,” the police statement read. 

Adults? Hardly.

Sgt. Chris Hutchison wasn’t here for the drama. “We don’t have room for violence or property damage or anything like that,” he said.

Meanwhile, a plane buzzed over Buchanan High School’s Veterans Memorial Stadium, trailing a banner that screamed, “no boys in girls’ sports.” Subtle, right? The stunt, caught on video by California activist Beth Bourne, was the brainchild of Women Are Real and the Independent Council for Women’s Sports (ICONS), who are clearly done with the status quo bs.

Fallon Fox (R) a man, seriously injured Tamikka Brents (L) a woman

Kim Jones, ICONS co-founder, didn’t mince words in a press release: “California is beginning to reap the consequences of defying federal law and brazenly harming girls. How long will Governor Newsom and legislators in this state continue to prioritize granting a few boys the right to take opportunities and recognition away from girls? Not one single boy should ever be in girls’ sports. It’s the easiest problem in the world to solve and the most brazen public ‘screw you’ to female athletes by Democrat leadership. Since when do we tell a single boy he is more important than every girl in the competition? That he has the right to ruin sports for all of them? It’s time for California to pay and it’s time to right these wrongs.” 

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

On the ground, pro-gender dysphoric protesters showed up to cheer on AB Hernandez, the gender dysphoric athlete from Jurupa Valley High School who’s been steamrolling the girls’ track postseason in 2025. 

The California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) meet has been under a national spotlight, and not the good kind. Even President Donald Trump jumped in, firing off a Truth Social post on Tuesday, threatening to yank funding and order local authorities to block trans athletes from girls’ categories. 

Then, the Department of Justice piled on, announcing Wednesday it’s investigating the CIF and California AG Rob Bonta over the state’s law letting biologically male trans athletes compete with girls. The CIF, clearly feeling the heat, scrambled to announce rule changes Tuesday and Wednesday, expanding the competitor pool and tossing medals to any “biological female” athlete bumped by a trans competitor. 

Band-aid on a broken leg, damaged eye socket, loss of consciousness anyone? The idea of men and boys competing against girls and women is ludicrous at best, and dangerous to deadly, at worst.

Tweet

Riley Gaines Smacks Down ‘Deranged’ Keith Olbermann After He Tries to Slam Her Swimming Skills

Leave it to Keith Olbermann, the perpetually unemployed basement-dweller, to pick a fight with a champion like Riley Gaines, host of Gaines for Girls on OutKick.com. Spoiler alert: it didn’t end well for the guy who’s been fired more times than a circus cannon.

Olbermann, who seems to think tweeting snark from his mom’s basement qualifies as a personality, decided to take a swing at Gaines’ athletic record after Education Secretary Linda McMahon pointed out that Gaines might’ve clinched a race if not for a biological male competing. Olbermann, ever the keyboard warrior, fired off this gem:

“She finished 85th in the Olympic Trials,” the loser sneered. “She finished tied for 5th in the only race including a transgendered athlete. If there had been none, she MIGHT have finished tied for 4th, or had 5th place to herself.”

Then, because he can’t resist stepping on his own rake, he added: “[Gaines] was, somehow, a worse swimmer than she is a MAGA stooge.”

What a dork.

Big mistake, Keith. You don’t poke a lioness with a stick and expect to walk away unscathed. Gaines, a former NCAA swimming star, clapped back with the kind of precision that’d make a sniper jealous. She pointed out she was 15 during those Olympic trials.

“And I placed 5th in the nation in a sport measured in .01s of a second without going a best. Would you say the 5th-best college football player is objectively bad at their sport?” she fired back. Then came the knockout: “No. You’re just a misogynistic pig [and] an old, deranged man with a terminal case of TDS who can’t hold down a job.”

Boom! That’s gonna leave a mark. 

And she’s totally on the money about him. Olbermann’s resume reads like a rap sheet of terminations like Fox Sports, Current TV, ESPN (twice, because once wasn’t enough), and MSNBC/NBC. The man’s been canned so often he probably lists “professional firing victim” on his LinkedIn.

Not content to let him slink away, Gaines upped the ante, telling Fox News Digital she’d race Olbermann for charity. At first, she hesitated, and for good reason: “I’d challenge [Keith] to a race where the loser puts up $ to the charity of the winner’s choice, but no one wants to see him in a Speedo.”

Fair point because the mental image alone is enough to make you want to bleach your brain. But Gaines, being the class act she is, threw down the gauntlet anyway—a 200-yard freestyle for a good cause. Olbermann, predictably, scurried back to his cave, dusted the Cheeto crumbs off his keyboard, and tweeted this pathetic dodge:

“This is a brilliant idea [Riley]! A 66-year-old man with an arthritic left knee and chronic stress fractures in the right foot,” he whined. “Somebody you could finally beat!”

So shut up, Keith. Nice try. Even in your glory days, if you ever had any, you’d have been lapped by Gaines before you could say “unemployment check.” Let’s talk credentials. Gaines? A decorated NCAA swimmer with a trophy case full of accolades: 2021 and 2022 All-SEC First Team, 2022 SEC Female Scholar-Athlete of the Year, and one of the most accomplished swimmers in Kentucky’s history. Olbermann? His greatest athletic achievement was reportedly smacking his head on a subway pole at Shea Stadium in 1980, leaving him too dazed to drive. True story.

This isn’t Olbermann’s first time getting schooled by a strong woman. He once tried to tangle with Megyn Kelly over her NBC exit, and she mopped the floor with him. “But the record is very clear that I left voluntarily because I wanted to raise my family,” Kelly shot back. “Something you don’t know anything about because no one would marry you.” She didn’t stop there: “And you have no children. You have a cold, lonely life in which you’ve become a bitter, bitter man.”

He probably went back to the basement and cried quietly into his cat-pissed sofa.

And now, here’s Olbermann, still bitter, still deranged, shouting into the void, desperate for clout by attacking a woman with more talent in her pinky than he’s got in his entire rant-filled existence. Riley Gaines isn’t just a better athlete—she’s a better human. And Keith? He’s just a sad, jobless troll who keeps picking fights he can’t win. Keep swinging, buddy. You’re only knocking yourself out.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

SCOTUS Gives Trump a 'W' on Scrapping Parole for 500K Migrants, Sotomayor and Jackson Aren’t Thrilled

The Supreme Court just tossed President Donald Trump a huge win in his border crackdown saga. On Friday, the justices put a hold on a lower court’s attempt to stop the President from deporting roughly 500,000 migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. This is a short-term victory for Trump as he doubles down on his immigration hardline in round two of his presidency.

The White House was ready to rumble. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt didn’t mince words on Tuesday, saying, “The White House will ‘fight this in a court of law’” after a judge tried to block Trump’s move to end a parole program for folks from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. 

What’s at stake here? Glad you asked.

The court’s order temporarily halts a ruling that stopped Trump from yanking Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for these migrants. TPS is like a legal shield that lets people live and work in the U.S. if their home countries are a hot mess, such as  disasters, wars, or other “extraordinary and temporary conditions.” 

Trump’s team wants to rip that shield away, and for now, the Supreme Court’s got their back.

The decision, like most of the court’s emergency orders, came without a signature or explanation. Classic Supreme Court move to simply drop the ruling and let everyone else figure out why.

But leftist Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson had plenty to say, and it wasn’t pretty. In a fiery dissent, they tore into the court’s call. Jackson, who doesn't know what a woman is, didn’t hold back, saying the court “plainly botched” its assessment and ignored the “devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens [aka illegal aliens] while their legal claims are pending.” 

She went on: “While it is apparent that the government seeks a stay to enable it to inflict maximum pre-decision damage, court-ordered stays exist to minimize, not maximize, harm to litigating parties.” 

The TPS program’s been a lifeline for migrants, especially illegal ones. It is to be renewed every 18 months like clockwork, most recently under former alleged President Joe Biden, before he wandered out of office. 

Illegal migrant flipping off police

But Trump’s crew, led by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, came in hot this February, trying to pull the plug on protections for a chunk of Venezuelan nationals. Their reasoning? It’s not in the “national interest.” Noem’s been out here signing executive orders alongside Trump, who’s clearly not slowing down, and this scares the crap out of Democrats.

U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer wasn’t playing with his toes either. He told the justices earlier this month to let the administration do its thing, accusing U.S. District Judge Edward Chen of overstepping. “The district court’s reasoning is untenable,” Sauer argued, saying the TPS program involves “particularly discretionary, sensitive, and foreign-policy-laden judgments of the Executive Branch regarding immigration policy.” 

In other words, back off, judge—Trump’s got this.

This isn’t the first time the Supreme Court’s given Trump a green light lately. Earlier this month, they okayed his plan to revoke protected status for 350,000 Venezuelan illegal alien migrants, clearing the path for deportations. 

So, what’s next? The White House is gearing up for a legal brawl, and with Sotomayor and Brown-Jackson, throwing punches in dissent, this fight’s far from over. 

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Biden’s Border Disaster: ICE Rounds Up Murderers and Child Rapists in Boston While Sanctuary Policies Shield Criminals

In a shocking display of what open-border policies have unleashed, Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin embedded with ICE in Boston, where agents are taking down some of the worst criminals and illegal immigrants, including an alleged murderer and child rapists. 

This comes as the Trump administration faces pushback from left-wing officials hell-bent on protecting their sanctuary city status over the safety of Americans.

Operation “Patriot,” the largest ICE sweep since President Trump’s return to the White House, is closing in on 1,500 arrests of dangerous illegals. Among them is a Salvadoran scumbag convicted of child rape, deported in 2017, who was caught living right next to a children’s playground. 

If that doesn’t make your blood boil, how about another illegal from El Salvador, on Interpol’s Red Notice for aggravated murder, kidnapping, and robbery? Fox News captured both arrests on camera, exposing the grim reality of Biden’s border legacy. 

So where are the other legacy news outlets?

“It’s not unusual. Due to the open border policies, we are finding that plenty of people who have been previously deported and committed heinous crimes and were removed from the country are now back here, just living among us,” said Patricia Hyde, head of ICE Boston. “And now that’s our job to go round them up.”

ICE deployed 19 teams across Massachusetts, pulling in agents from across the country to clean up the mess left by sanctuary policies in Boston and beyond. About 70% of those nabbed have convictions or pending charges for heinous crimes. ICE also arrested a Colombian illegal facing charges for sexually assaulting a child and a Dominican drug trafficker now peddling fentanyl. Then there’s the Guatemalan illegal charged with aggravated child rape and a Honduran charged with rape—both released from state custody by Massachusetts’ soft-on-crime officials.

“We’re not going away. It might take us longer. It might be harder, but we’re not going away, we’re here,” Hyde declared. “We know what the American people voted for. We understand that we work for the American people and we’re going to be here until we send everyone home.”

But here’s the problem: local ICE activists and sanctuary city policies are making it harder for agents to do their jobs. 

On Thursday, activists tried to physically interfere with an arrest, grabbing a handcuffed illegal. In another case, a crowd blew ICE’s cover while agents staked out a murderer’s home. Hyde didn’t mince words: “I think the lack of cooperation is getting worse and worse, and it’s putting law enforcement lives in danger.”

This is the direct result of Democrat-run sanctuary cities like Boston thumbing their noses at federal immigration laws. As Border Czar Tom Homan surges ICE into these lawless zones, the left’s obsession with protecting criminal illegals over American citizens is on full display. Meanwhile, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin is left scrambling to defend the indefensible as the Trump admin’s deportation agenda kicks into high gear.

The American people have had enough, and ICE is finally delivering the justice they voted for. But with activists and local officials actively working against law enforcement, how many more child rapists and murderers are still roaming free?

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Treasonous Techie Tries to Spill Secrets, Gets Snagged by FBI

Here we go again with another genius thinking they can play spy games and not get caught. 

Nathan Laatsch, a 28-year-old IT geek at the Defense Intelligence Agency, decided he didn’t “agree or align” with the Trump administration’s values and thought the best way to stick it to 'the man' was to try peddling classified information to a foreign government. 

According to the DOJ, Laatsch, who’s been a DIA employee since 2019 with a top-secret clearance, got nabbed in Virginia on Thursday after the FBI got a tip back in March 2025. Apparently, this guy was itching to share “completed intelligence products, some unprocessed intelligence, and other assorted classified documentation” because, you know, he’s got a beef with the current administration. 

Shades of Edward Snowden.

The FBI, doing what they do best, set up a sting operation. Laatsch thought he was chatting up a foreign agent, but surprise, it was an FBI undercover operative. 

Over multiple conversations, he bragged about transcribing classified info onto a notepad at his desk like he’s auditioning for a bad spy movie. The DOJ says he smuggled the stuff out of his workspace over three days, perhaps thinking he was saving the world.

The feds arranged a drop-off at a park in northern Virginia, because nothing screams “covert” like a public park, right? On or around May 1, the geek dropped a thumb drive loaded with a message and documents marked Secret and Top Secret. His note was a cocky little boast about providing “a decent sample size” of classified goodies to show off what he could access. 

By May 7, after the thumb drive was “retrieved,” Laatsch, got greedy, hinting he wanted something in return. The next day, he laid it out: “citizenship for your country” because he’s not optimistic about America’s future. Oh, and he’s “not opposed to other compensation” but doesn’t need “material compensation.” So it appears the dude has principles, but he’s not above a little side hustle.

From May 15 to May 27, he kept at it, scribbling more secrets and sneaking them out by stuffing notes in his clothes like a kid hiding candy. Finally, on Thursday, he showed up at another prearranged drop spot, ready to hand over the goods. The FBI swooped in causing him to soil his skivvies, and now he's cooling his heels, facing a court date on Friday in the Eastern District of Virginia.

I suspect he'll be losing his top secret clearance and probably his freedom as well.

Look, we all know that politics can make people lose their minds. But going full Benedict Arnold because you don’t vibe with the administration? That’s a special kind of stupid. 

Laatsch thought he was outsmarting everyone, but all he did was gift-wrap his future for the feds. Maybe next time, stick to angry Reddit threads, pal.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Hamas unhappy with ceasefire proposal because it favors Israel's right to exist

Hamas is spitting mad, and they’re not shy about it. A source tight with the group told The Jerusalem Post that Hamas sees the latest ceasefire and hostage deal from US envoy Steve Witkoff as a blatant pro-Israel tilt, more lopsided than anything they’ve seen before. “Screwed over” is how they feel, with one insider griping to the Post that the US is peddling a proposal that doesn’t even pretend to guarantee an end to the war. 

No wonder they’re not buying Witkoff’s pitch at face value, Hamas is demanding tweaks, and they’re not whispering it.

The deal’s got some meat: 10 living hostages and the bodies of 18 would be freed, with 125 Palestinian lifers and 1,111 post-October 7 prisoners walking out of Israeli jails, according to Saudi outlet Al-Hadath. Gaza would also get a beefed-up aid flow. But here’s the problem: Hamas has to cough up all hostages in a week, leaving them with zero leverage. Personally, they should be made to release all the hostages immediately, but that isn't going to happen.

A source close to Hamas told Walla that Witkoff rolled over for most of Ron Dermer’s demands in a Tuesday sit-down, making the deal smell like an Israeli wish list.

Worse, there’s no ironclad US promise that the 60-day ceasefire will stick or morph into something permanent, which is always had done historically. Hamas has even promised to attack Israel again and again, until it's destroyed [and therefore all the Jews would be killed. And they try to say that it's Israel, not Hamas, who's employing genocide].

The source fumed to Walla: no clause says the truce holds if talks drag past 60 days, and Israel could pull a March rerun, breaking it unilaterally.

Hamas’ leadership isn’t playing coy. “The Hamas Movement’s leadership has received the new Witkoff proposal from the mediators and is reviewing it responsibly to serve the interests of our people, provide them relief, and achieve a permanent ceasefire in the Gaza Strip,” they said in a statement. 

But Basem Naim, a Hamas political bureau heavy, wasn’t so diplomatic. “The agreement that Israel agreed to does not meet our demands,” he told Reuters, adding that they’re “responsibly considering” their next move. Translation: they’re not signing this anytime soon.

Now, Al-Hadath’s report is stirring the pot, claiming Hamas is on the verge of agreeing to the 60-day ceasefire for those hostages. That’s in direct conflict with what sources are telling the Post and Walla. A senior Israeli official threw more shade, saying, “Contrary to reports, the Witkoff agreement proposed in recent days did not determine the new deployment line of the IDF, nor the manner in which aid would be distributed within the framework of a ceasefire.” So, what’s the real deal? Nobody’s saying.

The proposal itself? It’s got two rounds of hostage releases—10 living, 18 dead—plus that 60-day truce, extendable if both sides play nice. The IDF would pull back from parts of Gaza, and the UN would step in to handle aid distribution, a source told the Post. Sounds tidy, but Hamas isn’t biting. They’re digging in, convinced Witkoff’s deal is a trap dressed up as a lifeline.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

FBI Director Patel had to divert resources to investigate 'copycats' of Comey's "86 47" seashell event

FBI Director Kash Patel is fuming, and you can’t blame him. He has agents chasing down “copycats” who think it’s open season on threatening President Donald Trump, all because former FBI Director James Comey decided to play cute with a cryptic Instagram post. You know the one, seashells on a beach spelling out “86 47.” 

As if we don't know what that means.

Bureau brass told Fox News Digital they’re fed up, saying they need to be laser-focused on “public safety, not cleaning up after political stunts.” Can’t argue with that. Patel, sitting down with Fox News’ Bret Baier, didn’t mince words about the mess Comey’s “beachside venture” has caused. 

The FBI’s now stuck playing whack-a-mole with wannabe assassins, inspired by Comey’s post.

“Do you know how many agents I’ve had to take offline from chasing down child sex predators, fentanyl traffickers, terrorists because everywhere across this country, people are popping up on social media and think that a threat to the life of the president of the United States is a joke and they can do it because he did it?” Patel said. “That’s what I’m having to deal with every single day, and that’s what I’m having to pull my agents and analysts off because he thought it was funny to go out there and make a political statement.”

An FBI official, keeping the exact number of these “copycat” threats under wraps due to ongoing probes, told the outlet that the volume is “significant.” That’s code for “it’s a lot, and it’s a problem.” 

Meanwhile, Comey had to drag himself to D.C. this month to explain his artsy seashell post to Secret Service officials, per two sources who spoke with Fox News Digital. The post, now deleted, showed “86 47” in shells with a caption: “Cool shell formation on my beach walk.” Ha, he implied that he just came across the formation.

Some folks read “86” as “get rid of” and “47” as Trump, the 47th president. Gee, wonder why. Comey, catching heat, played dumb, which for him is a 'left-hand job': “I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message,” he wrote in a follow-up. “I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.” 

President Trump, in a May sit-down with Brett Baier, wasn’t buying it. “He knew exactly what that meant. A child knows what that meant,” Trump said. “If you're the FBI director, and you don't know what that meant, that meant ‘assassination,’ and it says it loud and clear.” 

The FBI is not laughing. 

One official laid it out for the outlet: “What people need to understand is that every copycat threat forces the FBI to divert time, agents and resources; resources that should be spent saving lives and taking criminals and deadly drugs off our streets.” 

They’re not wrong. The Bureau’s got better things to do than mop up Comey’s mess, especially when lawmakers in places like California and New York are still caping for him. The official added, “This kind of chaos was normalized by someone who knows better, and the director reminds lawmakers… that we should be focused on public safety, not cleaning up after political stunts.”

Comey’s little beach art project has the FBI scrambling, and Patel’s team is stuck dealing with the fallout. Next time, maybe stick to collecting seashells instead of stirring the pot, Jim.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Harvard revokes tenure of prof. over data manipulation allegations

Harvard University just yanked the tenure of Francesca Gino, a big-shot business administration professor, after she got tangled up in accusations of cooking the books on her data. This isn’t some minor slap on the wrist. Harvard’s pulling rank, and it’s a rare move. “This is the first time it has occurred in recent decades,” a Harvard spokesperson spilled to Fox News Digital, sounding about as thrilled as a bureaucrat at a tax audit.

Losing tenure is like getting your VIP pass yanked; it’s a big deal and usually only happens if the institution thinks you’ve crossed a major line, like fudging research or breaking ethical codes. Even then, it’s a slog to strip it away, which is why Gino fought for years to keep hers.

Gino’s been slugging it out against these claims for nearly four years, according to The Harvard Crimson. Before the data fraud stink hit, she was a rockstar in the ivory tower, diving deep into the irony of studying honesty and ethics. Her whole gig was preaching integrity while allegedly fudging numbers to make her theories pop. The Crimson says she was raking in serious cash too, pulling over a million bucks a year in 2018 and 2019, making her the fifth-highest-paid suit at Harvard. 

Hypocrisy much?

The trouble started when some eagle-eyed scholars sniffed something off in her work and aired it out on Data Colada, a blog that checks out the veracity of studies and doesn’t mess around. 

“In 2021, we and a team of anonymous researchers examined a number of studies co-authored by Gino, because we had concerns that they contained fraudulent data,” the blog’s authors wrote, dropping a bombshell. They claimed to have found evidence of Gino playing fast and loose with data across a decade, including as recently as 2020. They took their findings to Harvard Business School in fall 2021, and you can bet that lit a fire under the administration.

Gino, not one to go down quietly, slapped a lawsuit on both the Data Colada crew and Harvard itself, per The Hill. Parts of that legal brawl are still grinding through the courts. 

Meanwhile, she’s shouting her innocence from the rooftops—or at least her website. “I did not commit academic fraud. I did not manipulate data to produce a particular result. I did not falsify data to bolster any result. I did not commit the offense I am accused of. Period,” she declared.

Before this mess, Gino was a prolific name, churning out over 140 scholarly papers and scooping up awards like they were going out of style. But now, with her tenure gone and her reputation under fire, she’s fighting to clear her name in a world where trust is harder to earn than a Harvard degree.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Democratic Socialists of America are Jew-haters: defend DC Jewish Museum shooter as "political prisoner"

Elias Rodriguez: the face of the new American Nazi

Let us confront, with unsparing clarity, the moral abyss into which a faction of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) has gleefully plunged. The “Liberation Caucus,” a self-styled “Marxist-Leninist-Maoist” splinter of this increasingly radical outfit, has not only endorsed the cold-blooded murder of two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington, DC, but has demanded the release of the scumbag charged with their killing, Elias Rodriguez. 

This is not a mere lapse in judgment; it is a grotesque celebration of violence that exposes the intellectual and ethical rot festering within the far-left.

The facts are as stark as they are horrifying. 

On May 21, 2025, Yaron Lischinsky, 30, and Sarah Milgrim, 26, a young couple on the cusp of engagement, were gunned down as they left an event at the Capital Jewish Museum, hosted by the American Jewish Committee. Rodriguez, a 31-year-old anti-Israel/anti-Semitic neo-Nazi activist from Chicago, allegedly shouted “Free Free Palestine” as he was arrested, later telling police he “did it for Gaza.” 

How does killing a young couple in the US free Gaza, a place that isn't free because it's under the rule of Hamas, not Israel?

Charged with two counts of first-degree murder, he now stands as a grim symbol of the ideological fanaticism that has infected corners of the progressive left. He can get the death penalty, but that's likely not going to happen in my opinion. If he does, however, count on "The Squad" vehemently protesting the sentence.

The Liberation Caucus, in a display of breathtaking moral inversion, has aligned itself with Unity of Fields, a far-left group that issued a statement dripping with revolutionary sanctimony. “Elias Rodriguez’s targeted attack on two Israeli diplomatic staff on May 21, 2025, was a legitimate act of resistance against the Zionist state and its genocidal campaign in Gaza,” they declared, as if the slaughter of innocents could ever be dressed up in the garb of justice, like they did when Hamas slaughtered mothers in front of their children, the children in front of their parents before killing the parents, torturing, mutilating, beheading, burning, and even strangling the Bibas baby who was taken hostage. 

How does killing innocent babies free so called Palestine? It doesn't, obviously, it's simply Jew hatred.

The group went further, blaming the victims by claiming that “after twenty months of non-stop apocalyptic violence wrought by the Zionist movement” and “political and legal repression by these same Zionists,” the time has come for “real consequences.” This is not reasoned critique; it is the language of nihilism, a call to arms that fetishizes bloodshed under the guise of liberation.

Worse still, Unity of Fields—and by extension, the DSA’s Liberation Caucus—asserts that “Elias Rodriguez’s act was fully justified, at that place where legal and moral duties meet.” Sick.

They invoke international law, conveniently ignoring that such laws are not a blank cheque for murder. Their claim that there exists a “duty to take action to stop genocide, including the use of violence,” is a perverse distortion, a justification for terrorism that collapses under the weight of its own absurdity. They urge their followers to shower Rodriguez with letters, funds, and courtroom support, as if he were a martyr rather than an accused killer.

The Liberation Caucus, not content with merely endorsing this depravity, called the statement “excellent” and proudly added their name to it. “Free Elias Rodriguez and all political prisoners,” they proclaimed on social media, as if the man who allegedly ended two lives in a hail of bullets deserves to be lionized alongside dissidents and freedom fighters. This is not hyperbole; this is their own words, broadcast without shame: “Excellent statement that we are proud to add our name to. Free Elias Rodriguez and all political prisoners.” 

One wonders if they paused to consider the families of Lischinsky and Milgrim, or if such human considerations are merely collateral damage in their ideological crusade. Of course they don't because they have their collective heads shoved up so far into their nether regions, they can't see the truth and everything stinks.

The DSA itself, once a fringe but growing force in American politics, has long since abandoned any pretense of moderation. Its ranks include influential lawmakers like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Greg Casar, and Cori Bush, alongside former members like Jamaal Bowman and Summer Lee. 

Then there is Zohran Mamdani, a rising star and aspiring New York City mayoral candidate, who has made anti-Israel activism the beating heart of his campaign, accusing the Jewish state of “genocide” and denying its commitment to equal rights. This is not a marginal movement; it is a calculated effort to mainstream extremism within the corridors of power.

The DSA’s trajectory has been clear for years. On October 7, 2023, as Hamas’s massacre unfolded across southern Israel, the organization issued a statement blaming the carnage on “Israel’s apartheid regime.”

The very next day, they encouraged their followers to attend an “All Out for Palestine” rally in Manhattan, a move that reeked of opportunism in the face of slaughter. By January 2024, they were calling for an end to diplomatic and military support for Israel. In April, their international committee went so far as to defend Iran’s “right to self-defense” against Israel—a regime that openly calls for the Jewish state’s annihilation while arming and funding Hamas.

This is the intellectual cul-de-sac of the far-left: a world where murderers are hailed as heroes, where the slaughter of innocents is recast as resistance, and where the complexities of geopolitics are flattened into a Manichean narrative of oppressors and oppressed. The DSA and its Liberation Caucus have not merely lost their way; they have embraced a worldview that justifies violence as a first resort, not a last. 

To them, the deaths of Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim are not tragedies but talking points, mere footnotes in their revolutionary fever dream. And that, more than anything, reveals the hollowness at their core.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

U.S. supported aid to Gaza sees chaos: on Day One 500K meals supplied

In the grand, chaotic theater of human suffering that is Gaza, a new act unfolded this week. The American-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), tasked with executing President Donald Trump’s bold initiative to deliver aid directly to Gazan civilians, has emerged from its first day of operations bloodied but unbowed. 

Over 460,000 meals were distributed, a staggering feat, despite Hamas’s predictable thuggery, stampedes, and the inevitable sniping from the usual quarters. This is no small thing in a land where hope is as scarce as uncontested bread.

The mission is not merely logistical but existential: to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those for whom it is intended, bypassing the grasping hands of Hamas, who have long treated Gaza’s misery as their personal fiefdom. Hamas had been stealing the aid, keeping the best for themselves, and selling what's left over at exorbitant prices. Since their barbaric October 7, 2023, massacre, the group has made a grotesque art of pilfering aid, turning desperation into profit. 

A source close to one of GHF’s Secure Distribution Sites (SDS) described the day’s opening salvo: a Hamas roadblock, cynically erected to choke off access to the very people the aid was meant to serve. Yet Gazans, in a rare act of defiance, broke through, forming long, snaking lines to claim boxes brimming with flour, sugar, chocolate spread, rice, canned corn, pasta, tea, sunflower oil, tuna, and more. 

Meanwhile back in the USA and UK, people are clamoring in support of Hamas with chants of "free, free Palestine," and "globalize the intifada." Most of them are clueless of what an intifada is and simply Jew haters with a new excuse.

Videos captured the scene—Gazans cheering American contractors, shouting “Thank you, America!” in a spontaneous outpouring of gratitude. Many, according to the source, said this was the first aid they had received without being forced to pay for it during the war. Let that sink in: the first time in this wretched conflict that sustenance was not held hostage by extortion.

Hamas, predictably, recoiled. Their so-called Ministry of Interior issued a chilling edict, branding GHF’s plan to circumvent their authority “completely unacceptable.” “Anyone who cooperates with the occupation in imposing its agenda will pay the price, and we will take the necessary measures against him,” they declared, their words dripping with the menace of a regime that thrives on fear. 

However, GHF, undeterred, stood firm. “It is clear that Hamas is threatened by this new operating model, and will do everything in its power to see it fail,” the group stated. “These threats will not deter us.” Such clarity of purpose is rare in a world often muddied by moral equivocation.

The day was not without its chaos. Viral videos showed GHF contractors retreating from a stampede as Gazans surged toward a gate, desperation momentarily outpacing order. The team, wisely adhering to protocol, fell back to prevent casualties, and calm was swiftly restored. No shots were fired, a small miracle in itself. By day’s end, GHF had distributed 8,000 boxes, each capable of feeding 5.5 people for 3.5 days—462,000 meals in total. More trucks are expected Wednesday, a lifeline for a population teetering on the edge.

How many other countries feeds the civilians of their enemies? Israel has always had higher expectations than countries that, um, bombed Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Dresden, for example.

The White House, they said, is “proud” to back this effort. “The U.N. and other aid agencies were wrong to criticize – aid is getting to the people in need and through their secure distribution system, Israel is kept safe and Hamas empty-handed,” the official added, skewering the sanctimonious hand-wringing of international bodies that seem more comfortable parroting Hamas’s talking points than celebrating results.

 Indeed, Israel Defense Forces spokesperson Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani noted that over 400 humanitarian aid trucks—unaffiliated with GHF—sit idle in Gaza, uncollected by the U.N.’s designated team. “It’s a strange contrast to the recent lie of 10,000 trucks stuck at the border,” Shoshani wrote. “When the trucks are there, @UNReliefChief is more silent than ever.” One could almost hear the irony in his keystrokes.

Yet GHF faces fire from all sides. Anti-Israel groups dismiss it as a pawn of the Israeli government, while some pro-Israel factions argue that any aid risks prolonging the captivity of the 58 hostages still held in Gaza. GHF, for its part, insists it is apolitical, engaging with Israeli officials only for security and logistics.

“GHF is in communication with Israeli officials solely for the purposes of deconfliction and to ensure aid can be delivered safely,” the group stated. “IDF will not have a presence within the immediate vicinity of the distribution sites.” A spokesman for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denied claims that Israel is funding the mission, leaving one to wonder why the U.N. and certain aid groups spent the weekend undermining an effort that actually delivers. “The media should take a moment to reflect why the U.N. and certain aid groups spent the weekend trying to undermine such an important effort,” the Trump official remarked, with a barb sharp enough to draw blood.

The operation’s security is handled by American military veterans from Safe Reach Solutions and UG Solutions, who escort aid from Israeli border crossings to the SDS, where civilian humanitarian teams take over. “To be clear, security contractors will not be interfacing with the people of Gaza,” GHF clarified, preempting the inevitable accusations. 

Four distribution sites are currently operational. There are three in southern Gaza, one in the central region and there are plans for expansion, including “last-mile” delivery to reach those unable to access the sites. GHF even extends an olive branch to traditional aid organizations, offering its infrastructure to ensure aid is protected from misuse or theft. A noble gesture, though one wonders if it will be met with anything but suspicion.

The story took a poignant turn with the resignation of GHF’s executive director, Jake Wood, who stepped down over frustrations with balancing the mission’s demands against humanitarian principles. “However, it is clear that it is not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence, which I will not abandon,” Wood said, urging Israel to expand aid provisions. 

His successor, John Acree, brings two decades of experience in disaster response and refugee operations, a steady hand for a mission fraught with peril.

In the end, what unfolded in Gaza this week was not just a logistical triumph but a moral one, a defiant stand against those who would weaponize hunger. The cheers of “Thank you, America!” may fade, but the image of Gazans breaking through a Hamas roadblock to claim what is rightfully theirs will endure. 

For once, the aid reached the people, not the predators. And that, in this grim corner of the world, is no small victory.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Biden's 'garbage' line about Trump supporters sent Harris' campaign into panic

Holy cow paddies Batman! Joe Biden’s “garbage” jab at Trump supporters sent Kamala Hahaharris' campaign into full-on damage repair, similar to what Jake Tapper and much of lame-stream media are trying to do about Biden's mental acuity, or lack thereof. 

According to Tapper and Alex Thompson’s juicy tell-all book, Original Sin, Harris was left scrambling, reportedly turning to her team with a frantic nasal, “What are we going to do about this?”

It all kicked off when comedian Tony Hinchcliffe decided to lob a Molotov cocktail of a joke at a Trump rally on Sunday, calling Puerto Rico “literally a floating island of garbage in the … ocean right now, I think it’s called Puerto Rico.” 

Not the best joke, Tony. 

The backlash was swift. Critics screamed racism, and the anti-Israel Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez didn’t hold back, calling it “super upsetting” and an “authentic depiction of how Donald Trump believes and what he thinks about Puerto Rico.” 

Of course, had it been a joke about White people, AOC would not have noticed anything wrong. 

Democrats thought they had a slam dunk to paint Trump as the bad guy, but then Biden, in true Biden fashion, fumbled his words, and then the ball. 

During a speech to Voto Latino, the guy went rogue, allegedly sneering, “And just the other day, a speaker at his rally called Puerto Rico a ‘floating island of garbage.’ Well, let me tell you something… The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters.” 

That same night, Harris was out there trying to drop her big “closing argument” speech, but Biden’s gaffe stole the spotlight like a drunk uncle at a wedding. The Trump campaign pounced, labeling it “terrible” and dragging out the ghost of Hillary’s “basket of deplorables” for a victory lap. 

Trump, never one to miss a photo op, leaned into the chaos, hopping into a garbage truck in Green Bay, Wisconsin, on October 30, 2024, and later strutting out at a rally in a bright yellow vest like he was auditioning for Sanitation Worker: The Musical.

Harris, not one to be found at a Mensa meeting, stuck cleaning up Biden’s mess, tried to distance herself. “I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for, you heard my speech last night and continuously throughout my career. I believe that the work that I do is about representing all the people, whether they support me or not,” she said, doing her best to sound like the adult in the room.

Meanwhile, the 2024 race kept spiraling into a circus. Democrat strategist Brad Howard even popped up to spar with Will over whether Harris could charm Joe Rogan’s audience. Good luck with that one. Harris’ campaign was already dodging Biden’s verbal landmines—what’s one more tightrope to walk?

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Trump may take billions in grant money from Harvard and send it elsewhere

President Trump is at it again, taking aim at the elitist, anti-Semitic cesspool that is Harvard University. He has a bold plan to yank their federal funding and redirect it to something actually useful, and he is seriously thinking that might be trade schools. 

On Monday, Trump dropped a bombshell on Truth Social, signaling he’s had enough of Harvard’s nonsense.

“I am considering taking Three Billion Dollars of Grant Money away from a very anti-Semitic Harvard, and giving it to TRADE SCHOOLS all across our land,” Trump declared. “What a great investment that would be for the USA, and so badly needed!!!”

The guy loves exclamation points, doesn't he.

This comes hot on the heels of the administration’s escalating war with Harvard, the Ivy League’s poster child for woke dysfunction. 

Just days ago, the Department of Homeland Security pulled the trigger on the school's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, citing the university’s “pro-terrorist conduct from students on campus” and its cozy “collaboration” with the Chinese Communist Party. Naturally, the left-leaning academic elite are clutching their pearls and rushing to the courts to fight back.

Not one to back down, Trump doubled down in a follow-up post, oozing confidence that the feds will come out on top. “We are still waiting for the Foreign Student Lists from Harvard so that we can determine, after a ridiculous expenditure of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, how many radicalized lunatics, troublemakers all, should not be let back into our Country,” he wrote. “Harvard is very slow in the presentation of these documents, and probably for good reason! The best thing Harvard has going for it is that they have shopped around and found the absolute best Judge (for them!) - But have no fear, the Government will, in the end, WIN!”

Let’s be real; Harvard’s been skating by on its name for too long, while fostering anti-American, anti-Semitic radicals and cozying up to foreign adversaries. Trump’s plan to redirect that cash to trade schools—where real Americans learn skills that actually keep the country running—is the kind of common-sense move we’ve come to expect from him. 

The left will scream, but as Trump says, the government will win, and so will America.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Father of alleged Israeli Embassy staffers shooter was invited by a Dem to Trump's joint address

The dad of the guy nabbed for allegedly popping off shots at two Israeli Embassy workers outside D.C.'s Capital Jewish Museum this week was rubbing elbows with the elite at President Trump’s big Congress speech back in March, invited by none other than a Democratic rep from Illinois.

"Eric Rodriguez was our guest during the President’s Joint Speech to Congress, but we don’t know his family," a flack for Rep. Jesús "Chuy" García, D-Ill., told Fox News Digital, trying to keep things tidy.
Eric Rodriguez, the old man in question, is an Iraq war vet and a union steward with the Service Employees International Union, clocking hours at a Chicago VA hospital, per the union’s website.

"Eric represents the very best of our community – someone who has served his country, continues to serve his fellow veterans and fights every day to protect the dignity of working people," García said back then, probably not expecting this mess.

On the day of Trump’s speech, Rodriguez was out there slamming the administration’s handling of veterans in a video SEIU tossed up online, making his feelings crystal clear.

Rodriguez and SEIU didn’t hit back when Fox News Digital came knocking for comment. No surprise there.

"The reason why I am in Washington, D.C., is because I’m concerned about what Donald Trump, Elon Musk and DOGE are doing to the VA system," Rodriguez said in that video, throwing shade. "They’re indiscriminately cutting people’s jobs, they’re cutting funding and people rely on these funds. People rely on these services."

Fast forward to Thursday, and Rodriguez’s kid, Elias, was hauled into federal court, staring down heavy charges, including two counts of first-degree murder. Cops say he gunned down Yaron Lischinsky, 28, and Sarah Milgrim, 26, as they stepped out of the Capital Jewish Museum.

Feds claim Elias rolled into D.C. from Chicago the day before, lugging a legal piece in his checked bag, then snagged a ticket to some American Jewish Committee shindig. An unsealed FBI affidavit paints a grim picture: surveillance allegedly catches Elias creeping up behind Lischinsky and Milgrim at a crosswalk, then letting loose.

As the two dropped, investigators say Elias kept blasting, paused to reload, and then went at it again, like something out of a bad movie.

When the cops closed in, Elias reportedly spilled, "I did it for Palestine. I did it for Gaza. I am unarmed." Bystander video’s got him screaming "Free Palestine" as they cuffed him.

If the feds make it stick, Elias is looking at the death penalty or, at minimum, 30 years in the slammer.
"I strongly condemn this horrible, senseless act of antisemitism," García posted on X, trying to get ahead of the storm. "My heart is with the victims and everyone impacted by the attack. We mourn the lives lost and reject the idea that justice can be won through violence."

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

AOC blasted for past anti-Israel comments after anti-Semitic terror attack

Well, folks, Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Communist stepped in it again. This time, the backlash is as scorching as a summer sidewalk in D.C. 

After a terror attack outside the Capital Jewish Museum last week, the darling of the Dems tried to play the sympathy card on X, condemning the attack and tossing in some boilerplate about anti-Semitism. But the internet wasn’t buying her crocodile tears, simply because her track record on Israel reads like a Hamas fan club newsletter.

Here’s what she posted: “Absolutely nothing justifies the murder of innocents. I am devastated by the killing of two people outside an@AJCGlobal event here in Washington. Our prayers are with the victims, families, and loved ones of all impacted. As we await more details, we must be clear that hatred has no home here. Antisemitism is a threat to all we hold dear as a society. It must be confronted and rooted out everywhere.”

Sounds nice, right? Except the X peanut gallery smelled the hypocrisy from a mile away. One commenter nailed it: “Match-lighter Condemns Blaze.” Boom! That’s gonna leave a mark.

Arsen Ostrovsky, CEO of The International Legal Forum, wasn’t here for AOC’s vague platitudes either. He clapped back: “‘Two people’? They were two JEWS. And more specifically, worked at the Israeli Embassy. These are pertinent details. Maybe you ought to be more mindful of your relentless inflammatory rhetoric, that only emboldens the kinds of perpetrators from tonight’s heinous attack.” 

Then there’s Terry Schilling, head honcho at the American Principles Project, who went straight for the jugular: “You need to apologize for your complicity. Stochastic terrorism and all.” Translation: AOC, your anti-Israel word vomit has consequences.

Stephen Miller, a big brain over at The Spectator, pointed out the inconvenient truth: the shooter reportedly yelled “Free Palestine” after gunning down Israeli Yaron Lischinsky and American Sarah Lynn Milgrim. 

There you go; AOC’s favorite protest chant was the soundtrack to a double murder. Now that's embarrassing if you have a soul.

Let’s rewind. AOC’s been waving the “Free Palestine” flag for years, even excusing Palestinian violence back in 2019. Her logic? Israel’s “occupation” of Judea and Samaria—you know, that little corner of Israel where terrorism is basically a local pastime—forces people to riot. 

“I believe that injustice is a threat to the safety of all people, because once you have a group that is marginalized and marginalized and marginalized — once someone doesn’t have access to clean water, they have no choice but to riot, right?” she blabbered on “Ebro in the Morning.” Heavy thoughts for a dolt.

Fast forward to March 2024, and she’s still at it, accusing Israel of “genocide” in Gaza after Hamas pulled off the deadliest attack on Jews since the Holocaust. 

“As we speak, in this moment, 1.1 million innocents in Gaza are at famine’s door,” she bloviated on the House floor. “A famine that is being intentionally precipitated through the blocking of food and global humanitarian assistance by leaders in the Israeli government.” She added, “If you want to know what an unfolding genocide looks like, open your eyes.”

So how has the Gazan population gone from between 60,000 and 80,000 in 1948, to 2,100,000 today if Israel is committing genocide? Isn't that what Hamas was trying to do to the Jews on October 7, 2023? Isn't Hamas stealing aide from Israel and the US intended for Gazans and either selling it at high prices and keeping what they need for themselves?

Here’s the kicker: Israel’s been letting hundreds of aid trucks roll into Gaza daily, only for Hamas to swipe the goods like it’s a Black Friday sale. The UN’s distribution system? A terrorist’s dream. Israel recently eased up on aid restrictions, but guess what? Armed goons are still looting the trucks once they cross the border. Shocker.

AOC’s sanctimonious posturing might play well with her Brooklyn barista fanbase, but when your rhetoric sounds like it could be chanted at a terror rally, maybe it’s time to rethink your brand. The X mob’s got her number, and they’re not letting her skate on this one. Pass the popcorn.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Trump "not happy" with Putin after Russia strikes Ukraine in largest air attack in the war thus far

Trump didn’t mince words Sunday, taking a swing at Vladimir Putin from the tarmac in New Jersey, saying that he "doesn't like" what Putin has been up to lately. He was referring to Russia's largest aerial attack against Ukraine thus far in the war.

At Morristown Municipal Airport, with Air Force One looming like a shiny backdrop for his latest verbal sparring match, Trump let rip. “I’m not happy with what Putin is doing,” sounding like a guy who just found out his steak was overcooked. “He’s killing a lot of people, and I don’t know what the hell happened to Putin.”

The guy’s got a point. Russia’s latest barrage on Ukraine—hundreds of drones and missiles raining down on Kyiv and beyond—was a brutal flex. Trump, pacing the tarmac, wasn’t having it. “I’ve known him a long time, always gotten along with him, but he’s sending rockets into cities and killing people, and I don’t like it at all,” he said, shaking his head like he’s trying to figure out why his old pal Vlad’s gone full supervillain.

This wasn’t just any attack. Ukrainian officials are calling it the biggest aerial assault of the war—298 drones, 69 missiles, a grim fireworks show that left at least 12 dead and dozens more nursing wounds. Trump, never one for subtlety, doubled down: “I don’t like what Putin is doing. Not even a little bit. He’s killing people. And something happened to this guy.” You can almost hear the Jersey in his voice, like he’s ready to take Putin to task over a meatball sub.

The scene was pure Trump—striding across the tarmac, Marine One in the background, tossing verbal grenades before jetting off. He painted a vivid picture: Putin “shooting rockets into Kyiv and other cities” while Ukraine’s trying to negotiate peace. It’s like trying to have a heart-to-heart during a bar fight.

Across the pond, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s sounding the alarm on Telegram, begging the world to wake up. “The silence of America, the silence of others in the world only encourages Putin,” he wrote, practically shouting into the digital void. “Every such terrorist Russian strike is reason enough for new sanctions against Russia.” The guy’s got a point—silence is complicity when missiles are flying.

Trump’s no stranger to Putin, but Sunday’s press gaggle felt different. Gone was the chummy vibe; in its place, a blunt call-out. “He’s killing a lot of people,” Trump said again, like he’s trying to wrap his head around why his old buddy’s playing warlord. The photos from Morristown—Trump strutting, gesturing, owning the moment—say it all. 

The man’s not just talking; he’s performing. And Putin? He’s on notice.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet