ISIS declares parts of Iraq and Syria to be part of their Caliphate

ISIS, an al--Qaeda splinter group, after seizing large swathes of land in northern and western Iraq, has declared the establishment of an Islamic state. They are demanding allegiance by other Muslim groups because they won this land the old fashioned way: they killed everyone who got in their way.

The terror-religious group posted an online audio statement that coincided with the first day of Ramadan, a so-called "holy month" in which killing is put on hold. The spokesterrorist for ISIS, Abu Muhammad al-Adnani, announced that the group's caliph or head terrorist is Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. The announcement claimed that the caliph's land extends from the city of Aleppo in north western Syria, to the beautiful rolling rocks of of Diyala province in north east Iraq. 

Al-Adnani said al-Baghdadi is "the imam and khalifa (caliph) for Muslims everywhere." He actually had to say that or face beheading on that fun-for-all Islamic TV show, "Heads You Lose." 

Al-Adnani stated that the group ISIS will be changing its name to simply the Islamic State." While not giving an explanation for the change, it is believed the change is being made to make it easier for it to fit on jihadist tee shirts.

Muslims have wanted a world caliphate since Muhammed was a buck private, but leaders in the West, like Obama, pretend this "religious" pursuit is a simple criminal act or workplace violence.





Tweet

Pelosi Puts Variegated Sprinkles on Her Feces Cone

The House Democratic Leader, Nancy Pelosi, argued that the enormous influx of illegal alien children is not a crisis; it's an "opportunity." She's right--it's an opportunity for the future of the Democratic party and a tragedy for legal immigrants who have gone through the requirements to legally obtain residency status or citizenship. It's also going to be a blow to the job market when illegal aliens compete for jobs.

But the hypocrisy of Nancy Pelosi is breathtaking. "If you believe as we do that every child, every person has a spark of divinity in them, and is therefore worthy of respect--what we saw in those rooms was a dazzling, sparkling array of God's children, worthy of respect," Pelosi said, evidently not defining the differences between these divine illegal alien children and the unborn children she is willing to kill in the womb.

Liberals like Pelosi are willing to kill the unborn while proclaiming the divinity of future Democrats. The very notion that they believe we Americans don't see this as hypocrisy is insulting.

Liberals think they can try to feed us BS in an ice cream cone and we will buy it.



Tweet

Liberal Attacks Man in Wheelchair

At the Democratic Convention in Dallas, Trey Martinez Fischer

(D- San Antonio) operated his campaign booth and promoting "Loteria" cards, or Mexican lottery cards. The cards contained political figures and featured people with captions. 

For fellow Democrats, he assigned names that were generally neutral or even complimentary, as he did with Wendy Davis, who he referred to as a "courageous lady." But for Greg Abbott, the current Attorney General of Texas who is running against Davis, he had a photo of him with devil's horns and the caption "Diablito," or little devil.

Illegal Alien Democrats

House Minority Leader, Nancy Pelosi, will go to the southern border of the US tomorrow where she will be briefed by Customs and Border Protection (an oxymoron) regarding the enormous influx of illegal immigrants illegally crossing into our once sovereign nation. She plans to meet with a group of children whose parents or guardians sent them to the border where "coyotes" illicitly helped them enter the country.

Saba Ahmed Says Yadda Yadda

On June 16th the Heritage Foundation held an event on the Benghazi consulate attack where two of the panelists, Frank Gaffney and Brigitte Gabriel addressed a question asked by the only Muslim in attendance, Saba Ahmed. Hannah Harris Green of  The Nation , a far left waste of web space, claimed that Gaffney and Gabriel ". . . promptly attacked her with an Islamophobic rant." It seems when conservatives answer a question with facts and historical content, leftists claim that they are ranting. When you see the video, you will agree that Ahmed's question was answered respectfully and in Gabriel's case, somewhat passionately; but certainly not as an attack. Judge for yourself by viewing the Benghazi Coalition Event video

Brigitte Gabriel

The Nation quotes one verse in the Qu'ran that says there is no compulsion in religion. "You can't force people to convert,"  Green writes. What she didn't tell you, either because she is clueless or doesn't want you to know,  is that there is a little thing in the Qu'ran called abrogation.

Abrogation is when one Koranic verse (I tend to spell Koran the American way not Qu'ran) is cancelled out by a latter one that usually contradicts it.

 Ibn Abbas, a Muslim scholar, is very clear when he addressed the verse Green referred to that states there is no compulsion in religion: "If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah yadda yadda), never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter he will be in the ranks of those who have lost [all spiritual good]" (3:85). 

If you know anything about the Koran, which I suspect Green is clueless, you know that all the latter [Medina] verses are not generally peaceful.

Green, clearly an appeaser, goes on to say "There are a lot of peace verses 60:08 . . . "

But the rule of abrogation, as I mentioned, came about in Mohammed's (peas be up in him) Medina period, when his army of terrorists increased from about 250 terrorists when they were formed in Mecca, to around 10,500 by the time they killed their way to Medina. 

And just because the sura  Green cited is 60:8, this doesn't mean it came later in time. Sura 2, or "The Sura of the Sword" came later in Mohammed's history. 

The Koran is not laid out chronologically but in terms of the length of the suras--the longer ones are placed first in the Koran, followed by shorter verses, and they have nothing to do with when they were written. Oh, and by the way, they were written by a scribe for Mohammed because he was illiterate. And oh, the scribe often made suggestions to fix inconsistencies which Mohammed agreed needed fixing. So how could the Koran be the word of Allah if a lowly scribe could fix it? Oh, I almost forgot, then Mohammed had the scribe killed when he started asking the same questions.

But back to Saba Ahmed. 

Back in 2006, the then 26 year old Beaverton,Oregon woman (who grew up in Pakistan, which Obama pronounces "Pahkeestahn") made a run for Oregon's vacant congressional seat. Her website featured an Islamic prayer in Arabic. At that time, Ahmed said she was studying for an MBA and a law degree. However, in 2004, she was pursuing a double major: electrical engineering and physics at Portland State University. 

She is a family friend of Mohamed Mohamud (no relation to Mohammed Mohamad Mahammad).

 Mohamud is the Somali teenager who attempted to light up the Portland Christmas tree lighting ceremony with a bomb. Luckily the plot failed but Saba currently denies knowing this terrorist wannabe.

In January of 2011, Ahmed was featured in the local news after she was reported missing by her family. They explained to the police that she was diagnosed with a mental disorder and that she disappeared when she was scheduled to check herself into the Providence St. Vincent Medical Center.

Ahmed claimed she was not diagnosed with a mental disorder but she had a family dispute at the time and attributed the "lie" to that. On her blog, Ahmed explained that it all had to do with a complicated story about her involvement with a romantic involvement in Florida for which she was "unfairly arrested" for stalking and simply being trapped in the home of another man who had two wives (Mohammed had 12, peas be up in him).

Several nights ago, Saba discussed the Heritage Foundation "attack" on her, on 

Hannity She didn't stick to the issue and attacked Brigitte Gabriel instead of actually discussing Sharia law and its effect on women. 

Anyway, the good news is, Saba Ahmed's campaign was as successful as Obama's outcomes--she got less than 1% of the vote. There is a God, but His name isn't Allah, that's the moon god.

Tweet

ISIL or ISIS, What Difference Does It Make?

The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, (ISIS) is on the march and has basically surrounded Baghdad. But calling these terrorists ISIS is a mistake. They should be known now as ISIL or the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.

What is the Levant?

The Levant refers to a large area in the Eastern Mediterranean. It includes: Cyprus, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, part of Turkey, and yes, Israel. Remember the Palestinian chant: "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free." This is an Islamic goal--to "free" Palestine by removing Israel. ISIL has the same goal of destroying Israel and exterminating the Jews.

In Iraq, their main airport is under attack and just hours ago, the Syrian air force flew over the border and attacked ISIL positions, but no further information is available at this time.

So who is ISIL?

ISIL is a group of Sunnis led by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, a 43 year old jihadist who even al Qaeda feels is too violent to pray with.

Baghdadi (his friends call him Abu) fought in western Iraq in 2003 and was captured by U.S. forces in 2006.  Of course we released him at the end of 2009 and of course, he rejoined al-Qaeda affiliates in Iraq. This should have been a lesson to a certain president of a certain country, but talking to him is like talking to a wall.

The main goal of ISIS is to establish a caliphate in the Levant and Iraq. They will do this by killing all infidels, Jews, and even Shi'ite Muslims, because they only consider Sunni Muslims to be true Muslims and everyone else are seen as infidels.  

As far as we know, the size of this group is about 6000 members, all of whom hold staunch religious beliefs in Islam as interpreted by the Medina suras, or chapters of the Koran. These are the suras that came later in Mohammad's bloody history. And according to the law of abrogation in the Koran, it is the latter suras that abrogate the earlier ones, the less violent ones. This is why we have Islamic terrorism--they're simply following their scripture.

So Obama's analogy of ISIL being a "Jay Vee" team is as accurate as his 3 point shot. He is in over his head and ought to be impeached for the good of the nation. But if he really loves the USA like he claims, he would resign.

A New York reporter is captured by Islamic terrorists who demand the president release three Gitmo prisoners in exchange. If the president refuses, they will behead the reporter and videotape it for the Internet. But the United States doesn’t negotiate with terrorists so the reporter has 24 hours before he is to die.

The clock is ticking . . .                      

Jihad Joe Soft Cover

click here for ebook version  

My other blog New York Canuck

Tweet

Al Qaeda Joins Team Syria to Provide Technical Assistance

The religion of peace flock

War torn Syria has been working with Islam's own al Qaeda terrorists--affiliated with Yemen--to develop a "new generation" of bombs capable of being smuggled aboard commercial planes. They claim these bombs can defeat the airport security systems and blow the crap out of infidels, which includes anyone who is not a Sunni Muslim. In fact, the Sunnis have a slogan: "Best direct your feet to the Sunni side of the street." And their theme song, "La Bomber" is scheduled to be played at a town near you.

The U.S. is worried about the thousands of Americans and other foreign jihadists who joined up to fight in Syria, and it has sparked a warning to the airlines to be on the lookout for explosives-in-a-toothpaste-tubes, shoes and cosmetics. You'll wonder about more than where the yellow went if one of those toothpaste tubes explodes.

U.S. intelligence has learned of an al Qaeda affiliate in Syria, the Al Nusrah Front, and other religious Islamic groups bent on jihad, were being joined by terrorists from al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula where the Yemen-based group that inspired the Christmas Ball Bomber to blow up his "boys" for Allah--it failed. These wonderful Islamic mission folk were also involved with the other failed attempt to take down cargo planes over the USA using explosives packed in printer cartridges.

Now these groups are working together to produce new and more "creative" designs for nonmetallic explosives and the U.S. believes they may try targeting a U.S. or European-bound plane.

If these terrorists are caught, they can expect to spend some time in prison where they will be provided with their Miranda RIghts, a Koran, prayer mat, great medical care 24/7, three good meals a day, a TV, exercise yard, soccer field, and a comfortable bed. But in the future, they know these things will be taken from them once they are released back into the public. 

I pity them.





Tweet

Obama's War on the US Constitution

Killing Anwar al-Awlaki via drone was justified by the Obama administration as long as it was done in accord with applicable laws of war. 

So it's okay for Obama to kill Americans because we're in a "war on terror" but how is it that we've released five terrorists and now we have the Benghazi attack mastermind on his way to the USA where we plan to treat him like a common criminal? Isn't this one of the the terrorists with whom we're at war?

This administration does what it wants to whomever it wants because they believe that they are above the law, and unfortunately, our other two branches of government does nothing to disprove this notion.

Guns are run into Mexico using straw buyers paid by the DoJ, and congress does nothing about it other than whine.

The New Black Panthers intimidated white voters at a polling place in Philadelphia, but Eric Holder's DoJ decides not to pursue the case and congress again, sits on its hands as Obama wins a second term.

The Benghazi terrorist attack, where Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans were killed ends in a dead end, it seems, while the administration stalls for time as more scandals erupt, and then it's "Dude, that was two years ago." And nothing is done other than congressional fuss-making.

The IRS scandal has Lois Lerner taking the Fifth and we now learn Lerner lost two years of emails. How convenient. And how incredibly convenient that her hard drive was also gone. If Lerner was not trying to target  conservative groups, then why is the left making excuses rather than being angry over a government agency acting inappropriately? But questions are asked by congress and they only get five minutes each to question the suspects who then filibuster without really answering anything of substance.

The Associated Press and the James Rosen scandals? Let's not go there now--freedom of the press deserves more than a paragraph here.

We are no longer the nation we once were. We are no longer a nation of clear laws when political interests are involved. And we need to demand from our representatives that they do a better job stopping the lawlessness of the administration. We obey and protect our Constitution, not shred it like somebody's emails must have been.


Tweet

Kerry Calls Striving for World Caliphate "Spillover Effect"

In a breath-taking display of abject stupidity, Secretary of State John Swiftboat Kerry labeled the Islamic drive for a total world Caliphate the "spillover effect."

 "The greatest threat to all of this region . . . is these terrorists," the Vietnam War Hero/Protester said at a Cairo press conference. The man who attended the opening ceremony to the Viet Nam Communist Museum met with President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi and discussed with him "the grave security situation" in Iraq. 

Yes, when your "security forces" strip off their uniforms and run home to Momma, you have a grave security problem.

Kerry plans to rack up some serious Frequent Flier Miles when he soon heads out

to the Middle East and Europe where his words of wisdom will be lost on many.

After the press conference, John-I-Married-For-Money-Kerry polluted the atmosphere by flying to Amman, Jordan when he will meet with the leaders of the Arab League, an anti-Zionist gang whose main goal is to eventually establish a . . . wait for it . . . world Caliphate.

Lurch Kerry touched upon Libya and danced around Benghazi (he didn't want to offend anyone). He said the United States has the same interests as the citizens of Iraq, which is to create a government that inclueds not only the Shi'ites, who are in the majority, but also the Sunnis and Kurds, both containing 20% of the population each. Kerry did not mention the four Jews who are in hiding for their lives because they're Jews; Kerry may have assumed they would be caught, be bound, and beheaded.

Seriously, if Kerry believesthat any Islamic country can ever be a true democracy, he must have bats living in that obscene head of hair.





Tweet

Atheist Group Offended by Islamic Symbols--No, Wait

An atheist group is trying to keep American mosques from displaying the crescent moon and star above their domes--oh wait, that isn't right. Atheist groups are not offended by Islamic symbols; I almost forgot. 

An atheist group does not want the Ground Zero Cross displayed at the National September 11 Memorial Museum in New York (which opened this past May 21st) where religious Muslims commandeered two commercial jet planes filled with terrified passengers and pilots who had their throats slashed with box cutters, and flew the jets into the Twin Towers, killing 3000 people. 

The mosque displays don't bother the atheists, the cross does.

A federal appeals court now says the group has to better explain how displaying the cross is "offensive" and violates their constitutional rights. Perhaps these atheists are offended by people who believe in God and practice their faiths in ways they see appropriate. Perhaps they had personal experiences with religion that tarnished them for life, or maybe they simply do not believe in a supreme being. What they believe, however, is to stifle the expression of the beliefs of others, except for Muslims.

The 17-foot-high cross is actually a steel beam that was part of the physical structure of one of the towers. It became a source of comfort for first responders who often prayed there and left flowers at its base. This offends atheists but the religious belief in jihad has yet to be confronted by these testicle-challenged atheists.

American Atheists first filed the suit in 2011, allowing 10 years to go by before having the courage to be offended. Imagine if these brave soulless creatures filed the suit in late 2001 or early 2002. The case was thrown out last year by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York.

An amicus brief was filed by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, an non-profit law firm specializing in church-state law, and whose goal is to protect free religious expression and traditions--things that evidently offend atheists.

Eric Baxter, a lawyer for the Becket Fund argued that American Atheists haven't the right to bring a lawsuit in the first place and said, "We're thrilled that the court picked up on this issue."

The atheist plaintiffs have until July 14th to file supplemental legal briefs to determine if the case will proceed. One question they must answer is how the offensiveness of the cross, which the atheists view as a Christian symbol for all 9-11 victims, becomes a "constitutional injury."

Sounds to me like their "feelings are hurt," but hurt is itself a feeling and you cannot hurt a feeling.

Another question these intolerant atheists must also answer is: if displaying the cross "marginalizes them as American citizens" how is that a "particular and concrete injury" compared to just "the abstract stigmatization of atheists generally."

The judge also wants the plaintiffs to prove their claim that taxpayer dollars are funding the museum. Sounds like the atheists make stuff up as they go along.

"Taking personal offense is not an injury that warrants invoking the power of the courts to shut down everything you disagree with," Baxter said. "The Constitution is not a personal tool for censoring everyone's belief but your own."

Sometimes it seems like liberals and atheists search high and low to find things they can be offended by--it isn't that they're actually offended; they just need to feel powerful.

If they really wanted to feel powerful, they ought to do something about the religion that attacked us. They ought to speak out against Islam's hatred for Christians, Jews, and all non-believers. They ought to speak out about those "moderate Muslims" who fail to speak out against jihadist atrocities. But that would require real courage and that is lacking in them like their lacking a belief in God.

Tweet

Divesting Israel, Presbyterian Style

Detroit: The Presbyterian Church voted in favor of the divestment of Israel on Friday. It is a protest against Israel's policies toward Palestinians. It is not meant as a protest against Jews or their medical assistance they provide to wounded and sick Palestinians (often wounded when their home made bomb explodes in their face), nor is the church protesting against the Jewish school children who face Palestinian rockets. It isn't even about how the Jews react to the Palestinian chant: "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," which refers to pushing all the Jews into the sea and taking over Israel.

The protest is simply an anti-Semitic rant based on a fantasy that Palestine was somehow a country that belonged to Palestinians, who, in fact, are mostly Jordanians. So the ignorant Presbyterians of Detroit want to boycott Israeli products, except those they really need like: cell phone texting, Microsoft products, medical technology that can save their lives, and desert irrigation systems that Israel invented and gave to the Arabs, to name just a very few.

What Jihadists Want

The American Jewish Committee said the divestment was "driven by hatred of Israel." I say it was driven by hatred of Jews, because that's what Israel means to most anti-Semitic individuals.

But genderless Heath Rada said of the vote to divest Israel "in no way is this a reflection of our lack of love for our Jewish brothers and sisters."

Rada is correct. The vote exemplifies a lack of knowledge of the reality of the situation between Israel and the Jew-hating Islamists who for 1400 years followed the Koran's cry to "kill disbelievers wherever you find them" (Sura 9:5, aka Sura of the Sword).

If you have any doubts that Jew-hating, Christian-hating, and just plain infidel-hating is part of the religion of peace, go here.

Peace in Israel means no more Jews to the Palestinians. To those Americans that support divestment, you haven't a clue about what you're doing.

Tweet

Just Another Video Catalyst

Fox News reports of an Iraqi Shi'ite cleric, Nassir al-Saedi who warned the US military advisers heading for their beautiful and bountiful country that "We will be ready for you if you are back." This peaceful man of the cloth referred to the US as "occupiers" and he plans to engage us militarily if we set foot on his lush, verdant nation.

On Thursday, "President" Barack Hussein Obama of the United States of America, TelePrompted that he is prepared to send 300 special troops into the sweet-smelling and fertile war-torn land, but this religious cleric, a man of Allah, gave the warning during "religious" Friday services (when such prayers about hating Jews, Christians, and everyone else that isn't a Shi'ite Muslim abound).

IRS's Koskinen Holds a Clinic on Arrogance

John Koskinen, the new arrogant leader of the IRS (Irritating Ridiculous Scumsuckers) was grilled in a congressional hearing today. The result of the grilling was a shouting match that sounded more like a Mexican cock fight than a group of gentlemen trying to get to the bottom of the controversy of how the scumsuckers lost thousands of emails that would have likely put Lois Lerner behind bars. As of this writing, Ms. Lerner still walks amongst us and is receiving her salary in full. Not a bad gig.

Paul Ryan (R-Wis) sparred with Koskinen, "This is unbelievable," he said. "That's your problem, nobody believes you."

Koskinen responded, "I have a long career; that's the first time anyone's said I don't believe you."

Ryan shot back, "I don't believe you."

When asked by the House Ways and Means Committee to apologize, the bald-headed stooge said that he didn't feel he had to apologize for the agency that takes our money and squanders it on idiotic "training videos," expects us to have years of our own records intact, and then loses the only ones that are relevant in the case against Lois Lerner. That, boys and girls, is arrogance.

"I don't think an apology is owed," Koskinen said. "We haven't lost an email since the start of this investigation."

Well lah dee dah. The problem isn't that the IRS hasn't lost emails since the investigation; the problem is they "lost" the emails that are the only ones that are important to the investigation. Oh, and then you destroyed the hard drive. That is so unbelievable as to be ludicrous.

It is likely that those emails are still available in the cyber world. They are probably on a server and certainly they have to be on the recipients' servers. I say check the White House server and see what's what. 

Tweet

Banning the Reds***s and Other Offensive Things Like the Koran

We need to ban everything that offends a significant number of people in our society. In fact, I believe liberal colleges across the country should offer courses in Offense Theory so that we can learn just how angry we should be over offensive books, titles, ideas, words, etc., etc.

We have banned the "N" word and a whole host of homophobic words and slurs. Why not ban the Koran, the Islamic book allegedly written by Allah with the help of Mohammed who needed the help of a scribe because the prophet of Islam was illiterate and a pedophile? But that's not what this post is about this time.

If we're to ban a team name of Redskins, I think we need to ban books that are clearly anti-Christian and anti-Semitic; specifically, the Koran.

The Koran can be thought of as two books, the early book when Mohammed was in Mecca, and the later or last book, when Mohammed's army had grown from a few hundred to about ten thousand, and this was when he and his troops were in Medina. The chapters, or suras, are not listed chronologically but in terms of length, so sura number 2, for example, actually came during the Medina period when Mohammed was cutting off heads and such. This should sound familiar to anyone who pays attention to world events in Iraq of late.

So, speaking of the Jews, the Koran says: "And they say: Our hearts are covered. Nay. Allah has cursed them on account of their unbelief, so little it is that they believe." (2:88) The "them" being referred to are the Jews. But there's more.

2:98 "Whoever is the enemy of Allah and His angels and His apostles and Jibreel and Meekaeel, so surely Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers."

But I find it offensive for any religion to refute the legitimacy of another religion, but alas, Islam does it: "Ibrahim was not a Jew nor a Christian but he was (an) upright (man), a Muslim, and he was not one of the polytheists." 3:67. As you may know, Ibrahim was Abraham and was born several thousand years before Islam became a religion. And Abe was a Jew--I know, I was invited to his bar mitzvah.

One of my all-time favorite suras is 5:51 "O you who believe! do not take Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other, and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people."

And I am very offended by the Koran where it claims that Muslims gave the Jews their holy scripture, the Torah (2:65), and gave Mary, the mother of Jesus, "Clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the holy spirit" (2:87). First of all, I find it very offensive the Koran did not capitalize "him" when referring to Jesus, like they capitalize "Him" when they refer to Allah. I also find it offensive that Islam takes credit for both the Jews and Christians while actually screwing up time lines of history and changing Judeo-Christian scripture.

"Taste ye Jews, the punishment of burning" (3:18). How sweet the holy Koran and how tolerant. Is it any wonder at all why Islam targets Jews and Christians? Is it any wonder why the Palestinians want to destroy Israel, their "Little Satan" and then destroy us, the "Big Satan?" The hatred is in the Koran and I think we Christians and Jews need to take a stand and get it banned. In fact, that might work as a slogan: "Take a stand and get it banned!"

Tweet:

Coincidences and Coverups

Ahmed Abu Khatalla is captured after 2 years since his involvement with the Benghazi 911 attack that killed our ambassador and 3 Americans. Hillary Clinton gets interviewed by Fox News Network practically at the same time we learn of this. Coincidence?

The IRS loses 2 years of emails that would have clarified the involvement of Lois Lerner and perhaps Barack Obama in the scandal that targeted conservative groups, keeping them from obtaining their tax exempt status. Then 6 more IRS officials had "the dog eat their emails."  Another coincidence?

Obama trades 5 Taliban terrorists for a lowly Army deserter. This happens at the same time when he is planning to close the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility. Now there's talk of him releasing scores more of these dangerous thugs. Yet another coincidence?

We had the Fast and Furious scandal, Benghazi, Bergdahl, Solyndra, the IRS, AP, NSA, James Rosen, and the New Black Panthers voting suppression scandal, lest we forget. One administration, so many "phony scandals." 

We have to ask ourselves the question: what are the chances we will ever get the hard evidence, the communications, emails and the like, about these scandals? Probably about as much chance as catching Jay Carney being totally truthful about Obama.

According to the Associated Press, the Obama administration last year cited "national security" 8,496 times to withhold information requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This is a 57% increase from the previous year. In fact, 36% of FOIA requests made in 2013 were either censored or denied, and in 196,034 other occasions, the "dog ate the homework" excuse was used--that is, they simply could not find the records requested.

So "the most transparent administration ever" is exactly the opposite of that claim. It should give you pause to wonder what other lies have they told, and what are they not telling us.






Tweet

It Only Took 642 Days to Get Him

It took a mere 642 days but the US has finally captured a prime suspect in the 911 attack in Benghazi that took the life of Ambassador Chris Stevens, and 3 other brave Americans. The terrorist is currently on his way to America via ship.

Ahmed Abu Khattala was captured on Sunday near Benghazi, and quite possibly just a few blocks away sipping a slurpee in public, and possibly doing another media interview about his amazing Benghazi adventure.

Ahmed (no relation to Ahmed the Terrorist of Jeff Dunham fame) is a commander of Ansar al-Sharia, the terrorist organization that orchestrated the Benghazi attack on the facility that was being used by the USA for reasons still unknown to those of us who funded it.

Upon his arrival to the USA, Khattala will be treated as a common criminal, not as a terrorist, and will probably be read his Miranda rights, given a brand new Koran and a prayer rug, along with three hots and a cot. He will not be treated as if he killed four Americans in a terrorist attack, and will have the right to remain silent. Khattala, in other words, will be treated as if he simply knocked over a gas station and had an accomplice who killed the attendant.

A small special forces team along with an FBI agent captured Khattala (possibly at an outdoor cafe signing autographs "for the kids" who love his work). He was taken by surprise and wondered if CNN turned him in.

"President" Obama said of the capture that it is a "message to the world" about what happens when Americans are attacked. He did not say: "over a video." He also did not say: "When an American is attacked, be assured that we will give you two, maybe three or ten years and then come after you, just when you think it is safe to appear on "America's Got Talent." And when we catch you, it is at that time when you will be read your Miranda rights and enjoy all the comforts of prison."

Thankfully, nobody was injured in the operation (whose code name was: 'Midterms'), because based upon how long it took to get this scumbucket,, his pursuers may have pulled a muscle or broken their walkers.

Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio believe this terrorist should be sent to Guantanamo Bay Detention, but you're more likely to see a rabbi as the Saudi King's spiritual advisor before Obama would agree to adding a terrorist to Gitmo.

Tweet

The NY Times: America's Most Red Paper

Chelsea Manning had an Op Ed in the Gray Lady, aka The New York Times. You should remember Chelsea as Bradley Manning, but he has since changed his name to fit his self-image of a woman trapped inside a traitor's body.  It seems fitting that someone like Chelsea would write for America's most red paper.

Back in 1996, The New York Times did an obituary piece on another American traitor, Alger Hiss, who died all too soon at the age of 92. The evidence of Hiss's guilt was overwhelming but the paper referred to Alger Hiss as: " . . . the erudite diplomat and Harvard trained government lawyer who was convicted of perjury in an espionage case that became one of the great riddles of the Cold War . . . " in an article by Janny Scott. 

But columnist, George Will said that Hiss's claim to innocence up to the time of his death had become "one of the long-running lies of modern American history." I tend to believe Will and those who testified against Hiss who had no ax to grind.

It seems that the Times always goes out of its way to defend or glorify those who hate America. 

Back to Miss Manning. on August 21, 2013 the editorial board wrote that they believe the 35 year sentence Chelsea received was too severe (see New York Times ).

"He had previously pleaded guilty to lesser versions of those [Espionage Act] crimes that exposed him to 20 years behind bars. For a defense lawyer, a sentence of one-third the potential maximum [90 years] is usually not a bad outcome. But from where we sit, it is still too much, given his stated desire not to betray his country but to encourage debate on American aims and shed light on the "day to day" realities of the American war effort."

So Chelsea gave over 700,000 classified government documents to Wikileaks, the largest cache of secret material ever made public in American history for all our enemies to see, He broke the law, betrayed his oath as a military intelligence analyst, helped the enemies of the United States with information, and The New York Times thinks 35 years is "too long by any standard." 

No, 35 years is too long by The New York Times' standard because they believe Manning's intentions supersede his behavior. That makes as much sense as a drunk driver claiming he didn't mean to jump the curb and kill those people.

Mad Magazine once made light of the Times with a masthead that read: "For all the news that fits we print," a take-off on their actual slogan. The trouble is, that is no longer true of the Times, and most of the mainstream media. They often do not print what they don't want you to read. You have to get your real news from the blogs and a few conservative news outlets.

Tweet

ISIS in Iraq as Heads Roll

Today it's Iraq, tomorrow it's Syria, if ISIS has its way. Then perhaps it will be Turkey until they can get to the final solution and finish off Israel and kill all the Jews. It isn't that they personally know any Jews who they hate, it's just that their "holy" book tells them it's the right thing to do. Of course, they don't have many nice things to say about Christians either, but they have their priorities.

President Barack Hussein Obama has no immediate plans to deal with this world crisis, but perhaps he'll take a poll and see what the public thinks he should do before he makes up his mind. In the meanwhile, he has some rounds of golf to play and there's nothing more important than that for him.

With ISIS planning to march into Baghdad, however, Obama is feeling a wee bit of pressure to do something politically expedient so he'll get back to us on that, after he speaks to his foreign advisers, he advised us. He speaks as if he's still learning what his role is as president, and keeping us abreast of it.

So here's what's going on in the Middle East as I write this.

First of all, the Shi'ites hate the Sunnis even though both groups are Muslims and they hate each other for religious reasons. Go figure. So they fight and kill each other for sport and consider the other group to be infidels. who have polluted Islam. If only they could learn to lovingly co-exist, to compromise, then they could fight the real infidels of the world: everyone else.

Iraq is a Shi-ite majority nation, with only 20% Sunni. The Shi'ites currently control the government and would like to rid themselves completely of Sunni influence. Iraq has already done a bang up job of getting rid of the Christians and an even better job of ridding the nation of Jews, most of whom are dead or fled.

But the word on the sand is that ISIS has its eyes set on Kashmir and would like to "free" it from India so that they can join the world jihad hate-fest. Not every Indian in Kashmir thinks this is a bad idea.

Meanwhile, there are Iraqi heads lining the roads near Tikrit and Mosul and more death and destruction is in the forecast as Obama is considering his options. Imagine if he planned things in advance.

Tweet

Insecurity and Our Borders

The US border is as effective at keeping illegal aliens out of the country as the VA is at expediting treatment for our veterans.

We have become a dumping ground for people who are looking for free stuff from our government, and a country that will care and educate their children on our dime. Where illegal aliens become recipients of US tax dollars, Democrats will become recipients of their votes--it's a win-win for both groups.

 Now I sincerely feel empathy for the thousands upon thousands of children who have been sent here with the assurances that they will not be sent back to their home country, but it doesn't seem fair to those immigrants who have come here legally, gone through the application process, and became citizens.`

The Democrats and some RINOs say it's time for immigration reform while conservatives say that we need to secure our borders first and foremost. The Democrats said that our borders are secure. They lied like Jay Carney on steroids.

The administration, as is typical of them, is defying the First Amendment by not allowing the press to photograph or interview the kids. I guess they didn't want the public to photograph Obama on our side of the border with a checker flag as they came across in droves.

There are scant bathrooms, no showers, and many of the children are sick, but they come here because Obama has given them the signal that it's okay.

It isn't as if we have unlimited resources for these new arrivals. In 2012 about 251 thousand children went into foster care and the total number in the system that year was 400 thousand. It's outrageous to think we can continue along this line of human influx and serve the children effectively. Amnesty doesn't serve the children it serves the Democrats.

It isn't a humanitarian crisis we have here, it's a political ploy.

Tweet