"No TikTok state ban for me, only for thee" Dem gov implies

Frau Whitmer

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) is the female version of South Park's Cartman: she does what she wants. But if you try it, you're in a world of trouble.

Michigan has banned the Communist Chinese-owned app TikTok on March 1st, on state-owned devices, but that doesn't stop Whitmer from flipping off the ban when it comes to herself.

“It is banned for state devices,” Jayson Cavendish, Michigan’s acting chief security officer, said in an interview with the MLive media group.

So TikTok is not allowed to be on state-owned devices except for Frau Whitmer's, which is the most state owned a state owned device can be.

The ban applies to all state-owned devices except for Whitmer, a [hypocrite], and for purposes of promotion, law enforcement, and cybersecurity, MLive reported.

Cavendish also noted, according to MLive, that Whitmer’s TikTok account “is accessed on a secure device that has never been on the state’s network, nor connected to the state’s wireless environment.”

Like most Democrat governors and others on the left, the rules don't apply to them, only to the peons who pay their salaries. So during the pandemic travel bans, Mr. Whitmer attempted to travel in order to take out his boat. The Landshark Bar & Grill in East Lansing where Gretchen sat with a large group of Democrats in violation of her own COVID-19 policies wasn't a problem as she saw it because hey, she's the governor. 

Gov. Newsom (D-CA) was with a dozen people at an expensive restaurant known as The French Laundry. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and the very attractive Mayor of Chicago Lori Lightfoot (D) had their hair done at a salon when establishments such as those were ordered to remain closed. 

Back to Whitmer.

Since the ban, Whitemer has posted on TikTok many times, as late as last Thursday, because she's special.

“It’s a state of Michigan device, but it follows the guidelines that are in place for the exceptions,” said Bobby Leddy, a spokesman for the governor’s office. “And the exceptions are for any department that feels that they need it for their job to convey with the public, or for investigative purposes.”

I think it's time the public reacts to this elitist crap at the ballot box. However, most Democrats don't generally know who or what they're voting for. As Nancy Pelosi pointed out [and I paraphrase]: if a turd shaped like the letter "D" ran against any Republican in her state, the turd would win."

This seems to be a proven fact.

Comments?

Tweet

Nadler might be under federal investigation for what he did

Jerry Nadler and his giant hearing aide buds

Rep. Jerold Nadler (D-NY) may have found himself in deep poo after likely violating basic ethics rules for United States representatives, a government watchdog group says.

The group, Americans for Public Trust [not a joke] told Fox News that it believes one of Big Jerry's senior staff members may be providing legal services for him, and that is in violation of House rules. The House Committee on Ethics website states, “[T]he outside employment restrictions define certain activities for which senior staff (as well as House Members and officers) may not receive any compensation whatsoever.” So if Nadler is paying the senior staff member, thus employing his services, he is in deep trouble for which the penalty would likely result in a clucking of tongues. 

“The restrictions prohibit senior staff from, among other things, (1) receiving compensation for practicing any profession that involves a fiduciary relationship, including, for example, law or accounting, and (2) serving for compensation as an officer or director of any entity.”

Robert Gottheim, district director, received payment from Nadler while he was a senior staffer from 2019 to 2021, and this could be a problem for Nadler, resulting in the wagging of fingers along with the aforementioned clucking of tongues.

According to Federal Elections Commission data, Gottheim was paid a total of $81,345.00 between 2019 and 2021 for what was categorized as “legal and political consulting.” See, words matter.

He's sticking to his diet, no matter what his doctor says

However, it sounds a lot like the term “fiduciary services,” for which Nadler is expressly prohibited from compensating Gottheim, according to House ethics rules.

A mouthpiece for Nadler's campaign denied even a hint of wrongdoing and said Gottheim “doesn’t practice law in any capacity, including the campaign.”

“He’s a campaign advisor, which doesn’t have any fiduciary responsibility. When the campaign files the quarterly reports the treasurer must choose a category to list his expenditures, so they chose ‘legal & strategic advising.’ He’s a strategic advisor, not a lawyer.”

So that may 'splain it, Lucy. But does it?

Gottheim is listed on the New York City West Side Democrat’s website as the organization’s treasurer, and his bio says he has been working as a Counsel for Nadler for Congress since 1997. It states that he has been  “handling all campaign finances & compliance issues with the FEC.” 

Again, this is fan-hitting information that is clearly prohibited for a senior staffer.

Nadler won't do well in a federal lockup. He's too soft; the guys would make mincemeat out of him--a lot of mincemeat.

APT executive director Caitlin Sutherland blasted Nadler for what she said was a violation of the law.

“Jerry Nadler brags about being the ‘conscience of the House,’ yet he can’t even ensure that his top staffer is in compliance with simple House ethics rules,” Sutherland said.

“It is absolutely against the law to be compensated for campaign work that involves fiduciary duties, and accordingly, we will look into filing a complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics.”

If the allegations against Nadler are true, and it seems likely they are, this would be extremely disturbing given his position. As the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, the big guy is supposed to uphold justice and fairness for all, especially himself.But as a Democrat, this isn't so important. He has bigger fish to fry and maybe BBQ a side of beef with a health salad to negate the cholesterol.

But if Nadler is going down, he's going to take a lot of House Democrats with him come November.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Let's investigate Nadler and see just what he's been up to. Next we can do the other millionaires on the Hill.

We're coming for you, Nancy, Chuck and Alexandria Obviously-Communist.

Tweet

Dems relieved the vaccine mandate doesn't apply to them

Democrats were almost up in arms when President Biden [his Indian name is "Shines Through Both Ears"] announced vaccine mandates for all businesses with over 100 employees and others that are connected to the federal government. 

However, once the left learned that the mandates didn't apply to them, they were behind it all the way. After all, elections have their consequences, right?

So while small businesses will be fined $1,400 per day per employee who fails to comply, this does not apply to members of Congress and their staff, the legislative and judicial branch, postal workers and teachers unions.

It's Joe's way of saying, "Your body, my choice."

The same philosophy applies to the mask mandates as well. You can't go to a restaurant without wearing a mask until you're ready to eat, but California's Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and all in his company can.

And during the lockdowns of last year, only Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi [her Indian name is "Sliding Dentures"] was going unmasked to the beauty salon, and it turned out to be a waste of time anyway.

And the Communist News Network's Chris Cuomo [his Indian name is "Reflection Erection"] didn't care that he ventured out of his home onto the public streets while he still had COVID, and then pretended he was in his basement all that time. He's a leftist like his sexually inappropriate, senior citizen killer brother Andrew [whose Indian name is "Blows Smoke Like Nose"] and they believe mandates aren't for them.

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) and even her husband, didn't think the rules applied to them. He tried to take out his boat during lockdown and she was caught on camera with a bunch of others who pushed tables together at an East Lansing bar, thus violating her own rules over masks and social distancing.

But this is not at all a comprehensive list of all those Democrats who broke Covid rules. The hypocrisy is amazing.

Co-President Biden came out with his dictatorial and racist vaccine mandates on Thursday. The mandates are racist due to the fact that a large percentage of people hesitant to take the vaccine are Black, and others who already had contracted covid are immunized even better than the vaccine can do but they too are mandated to take the Fauci prick.

But way back in April, "Dancing Dentures" Pelosi said that the House couldn't require members to get vaccinated. “So—so here is the thing. We are—we cannot require someone to be vaccinated. That’s just not what we can do. It is a matter of privacy to know who is or who isn’t.” 

“I can’t go to the Capitol Physician and say, ‘Give me the names of people who aren’t vaccinated, so I can go encourage them or make it known to others to encourage them to be vaccinated.’ So we can’t—we can’t do that,” she said.

And while Pelosi's tribe said that she was referring to House members only, since when do they have privacy rights that regular Americans don't have? That was the case they were making.

But even Biden [whose other Indian name is "Dances with Stairs"] said as late as July that he couldn't impose mandates that violate privacy rights.

He was just kidding, it turns out. That only applies to Democrats.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

CDC still hiding COVID data regarding mask reversal

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention [an oxymoron when it comes to COVID-19] issued new guidance that fully vaccinated people from the coronavirus should wear masks indoors in spite of the conflicting messages Pope Fauci had previously made public. 

If the vaccine protects us from the virus, then why should masks be worn? After all, if vaccinated people choose not to wear a mask and are willing to take the chance they might get reinfected with less chance of dying from coronavirus, then what is the problem?

Also, if you choose to take your chances with not getting vaccinated, that should be your right. And if you don't want your child getting the shot because they have a better chance of dying from the flu or suicide, that should be a parent's right, not a government mandate.

But the CDC is mandating a new guidance and refusing to show their work as to how they came to that conclusion. Their lack of clarity and obvious political inclinations as to how they base their decisions seems more likely to emanate from a totalitarian ideology than a scientific one. 

I had the jabs, I will not wear a mask because I cannot infect you and you cannot infect me. If you don't want the jabs, that's on you and I respect your decision even if I disagree with it. Why doesn't the government do the same?

And what's with Speaker Pelosi (D) with her cloth designer masks? The CDC says that cloth masks are basically useless, much like the Speaker herself. 

The idea that masks must be worn practically at all times is a deterrent for those who may have been weighing on whether to get vaccinated. What's the point if nothing changes?

"While the CDC issued their guidance yesterday at about 3 p.m., they have not yet released their scientific reports on the data that underlies their recommendation," New York City Health and Hospitals President and CEO Mitchell Katz said at a Wednesday press conference with Comrade Mayor Bill de Blasio, one of the top worst Democratic mayors of major US cities.

Supported the Sandinista cause

"I think we owe it to New Yorkers to very carefully, as you say, review that information and understand its implications," Katz added. "Our focus has to be on getting people vaccinated."

"We're assessing the information. What really is important is to assess the research behind it. Which is what our team is doing," de Blasio said when asked why the city is delaying any action to mandate mask-wearing for vaccinated folks. "We've got to make sure we understand the ramifications and what makes sense to do."

For de Blasio, it would be to resign and take up blow-painting with Hunter Biden.

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, a Harvard graduate, explained that the reason for the CDC's reversal on indoor masking for vaccinated people is because "in rare occasions, some vaccinated people infected with the delta variant after vaccination may be contagious and pass the virus to others."

[In rate occasions sober people driving within the speed limit get into fatal accidents. Does that mean we should prevent people from driving altogether, or perhaps make a federal speed limit of 5 miles per hour to prevent deaths? Harvard has become a joke.] 

They "may be contagious," Walensky said, because "the amount of virus" in vaccinated people infected by the delta variant "is pretty similar to the amount of virus in unvaccinated people."

But what's the mortality rate? If the symptoms are mild and practically nobody dies, who gives a crap? Should we wear masks forever because, you know, the flu, the common cold, the Democrats?

"The vast majority of transmission is occurring through unvaccinated individuals," Walensky said Tuesday. But, she added, "we thought it was important for [vaccinated] people to understand that they could pass the disease onto someone else." 

Yes, someone who decided to not get vaccinated because they have the right not to put something into their body. Whatever happened to "my body, my choice?" It's only true for the left when it's convenient.

Lastly, want to fight the COVID crisis in the United States? Stop undiagnosed illegal aliens from coming into the country with their high percentage of the virus.

If the GOP can't win back both Houses, they are useless and we will deserve what we get.

Why not consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.

Tweet

POTUS Pulls Plug on Pelosi on stalled COVID-19 talks

"How, Senator Warren"

One thing you have to say about President Trump, he takes no balderdash [as in crap] from the left or anyone else for that matter. The President announced Tuesday that he has put the kibosh on negotiating with the Democrats for another round of federal coronavirus aid.

Trump, as is his wont, tweeted  that Speaker Nancy "Dancing Hands" Pelosi "is not negotiating in good faith" and is seeking too much money.

Well, there's a big surprise.

Trump tweeted out that he is  “rejecting” a request for a $2.4 trillion package, which is tons more money than the $1.6 trillion offer from Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin. 

[Fun Fact : The difference between the two figures is $800 billion and the  difference between the two figures in one dollar bills weighs a lot more than a ton.]

Trump said he plans to pass a “major stimulus bill” after he wins a second term “that focuses on hardworking Americans and small businesses.” That is what is known in television land as a "tease."

Mnuchin and Pelosi, a loose-denture California Democrat, have made little progress toward a deal on new federal aid mainly due to her incessant insistence of putting socialist pork in the bill.

Trump’s announcement means there won’t be a new round of stimulus checks or more money for schools, day care and coronavirus-related health costs between now and next year, and while you can blame Trump for that, the real blame lands squarely on Pelosi's round shoulders. She simply wants to avoid passing a bill with Trump's signature on it because her only goal in the twilight of her enriched life is for Trump to fail, even if it comes at the expense of Six Pack Sam. 

But what does she care? She still stocks her $22,000 fridge with designer ice cream and rubs it in your face.

C'mon, man. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

Pelosi rips Trump 'a new one' and finally feels ashamed of herself

House Speaker Nancy "Dirty Hands Dancing" Pelosi (D-CA) tried to rip President Trump "a new one" by accusing him of a cover-up of "something, but I don't have all the information yet," and said his actions were "criminal."

Every Thursday, Pelosi and her hands hold a press conference in which she takes questions implying that President Trump is the worst president ever and everything is his fault, and then she disparages Republicans and Trump in public.

But this was the first time she went too far and admittedly, she has regrets.

The geriatric Speaker took questions about the president’s recent statement that he was open to taking oppositional information on his opponents from foreign nationals to use against them.

Dancing Dirty Hands spoke to the media:

Pelosi: “Everybody in the country should be totally appalled by what the president said last night. But he has a habit of making appalling statements. This one borders on so totally unethical that he doesn’t even realize it.”

“He does not know the difference between right and wrong,” she continued, “and that’s probably the nicest thing I can say about him. What is it about the Republicans in Congress? How much more can they bear of the president’s unethical behavior that they think that they are honoring their oath of office?”

Pelosi was asked whether it was “a good idea” to accuse Trump of a criminal cover-up right before her aborted infrastructure meeting with him a few weeks ago.

She answered, “I say almost every day that the president is involved in a criminal cover-up. He just chose to pick it up that day.”

Upon hearing Pelosi's words as he flipped through channels on the White House TV, President Trump heard what she said and he reacted with immediate ferocity, reaching into his bag of a dozen insults and tweeting:

Pelosi is a washed up hag and should be ashamed of herself.

Upon reading Mr. Trump's tweet, the Speaker of the House realized the gravity of her statement and hung her haggard head in abject shame. She knew she was wrong to have gone so far as to imply that the President of the United States of America, the most powerful country in the entire galaxy, unless proven otherwise, is a common criminal.

She tweeted back to POTUS:

I am so sorry and totally ashamed to have said that word and I take it back completely. Please forgive my impudence and know that next time I plan to speak to the media, my hands will think twice.

Case closed.


Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey
Thanks


Tweet

Pelosi Puts Variegated Sprinkles on Her Feces Cone

The House Democratic Leader, Nancy Pelosi, argued that the enormous influx of illegal alien children is not a crisis; it's an "opportunity." She's right--it's an opportunity for the future of the Democratic party and a tragedy for legal immigrants who have gone through the requirements to legally obtain residency status or citizenship. It's also going to be a blow to the job market when illegal aliens compete for jobs.

But the hypocrisy of Nancy Pelosi is breathtaking. "If you believe as we do that every child, every person has a spark of divinity in them, and is therefore worthy of respect--what we saw in those rooms was a dazzling, sparkling array of God's children, worthy of respect," Pelosi said, evidently not defining the differences between these divine illegal alien children and the unborn children she is willing to kill in the womb.

Liberals like Pelosi are willing to kill the unborn while proclaiming the divinity of future Democrats. The very notion that they believe we Americans don't see this as hypocrisy is insulting.

Liberals think they can try to feed us BS in an ice cream cone and we will buy it.



Tweet