Nancy "Dancing Dentures" Pelosi blasts Trump for 'cognitive' issue, then mixes up Biden with Trump

You can't make this stuff up. First our barely sentient President Biden attacked former President Trump for seeming to mix up Nikki Haley with Nancy Pelosi. Now we have Pelosi challenging Trump's cognitive abilities and got him confused with Joe Biden. 

The former House Speaker said she wouldn't get involved with discussing Trump's "cognitive disorders" on Tuesday before briefly confusing President Biden with 'The Donald.'

MSNBC's comrade Rachel Maddow asked Pelosi about Trump's attempt to attack the former speaker over the response to Jan. 6, but appeared to confuse Pelosi with GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley. "We’ve heard what Nikki Haley thought about that, that confusion, that mistake by Donald Trump. But I don’t know what you thought about it, and I’m curious," comrade Maddow said.

Pelosi said she wouldn't spend too much time on Trump's "cognitive disorders" before having a brief slip-up herself.

"Well, let me just say, I’m not going to spend too much time on Donald Trump’s cognitive disorders," she said. "He tried to say that Nikki Haley did not allow the National Guard to come, but it was Nancy Pelosi. It was nobody. It was Joe – it was Donald Trump. He knows, and you know, that Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer, and I begged for hours for the National Guard to come."

The slip-up of "Joe's" name is likely an unconscious trigger based upon Biden's obvious cognitive decline. It's therefore easy to confuse him with someone who she was trying to blame for the slip-up. 

"He knows that we don’t have the authority to bring the national guard, the president does. Sad to say to the District of Columbia, because every other state, the governor has that power. So, I’m more concerned about what he was trying to accuse her of, and again, his many misrepresentations. But don’t spend so much time on him. We don’t agonize about him," Pelosi said, her hands nearly a blur as her dentures did the Electric Slide.

So we have the pot calling the kettle cognitively impaired. Nancy Pelosi is not a rocket surgeon, that's for sure.

Tweet

BREAKING: Alabama death row nitrogen hypoxia inmate loses last ditch appeal

Alabama death row inmate, Kenneth Eugene Smith, 58, lost a last ditch effort for a stay of execution and is scheduled to be put to death with nitrogen gas, which is less painful than his victim who was stabbed to death.

Smith was convicted of the March 18, 1988 murder-for-hire of Elizabeth Sennett. Her husband, Charles Sennett Sr., hired a man named Billy Gray Williams to murder Elizabeth, and Williams, in turn, recruited Smith and John Forrest Parker to assist in the murder. The pair worked in concert and stabbed Elizabeth Sennett to death in her home in Colbert County, Alabama.

When her husband found that he too was a suspect in the murder, he killed himself. 

And on a happy note, Billy Gray Williams was sentenced to life without the chance of parole and died in the slammer in November 2020. Smith and John Forrest Parker were both sentenced to death and Parker got on the Hell Express via lethal injection in 2010.

Now it's Smith's turn and we shall see how this turns out. He's scheduled for execution Thursday, Jan. 25, 2024, which is tomorrow as of this post.

Tweet

Staff a LA Times being dramatically cut: now they'll have to take their own advice

The woke go broke is a true prediction and the LA Times is no exception. There downfall has been going on for quite some time and so too has the Washington Post. 

As with any company, if you're not making money you're not long for this world. And the way for the news media to make money is to appeal to the general public, and not simply the small percentage of woke folk who apparently never nursed properly or have serious problems with reality.

The LA Times has customer numbers in the proverbial dumpster and had to lay off 115 employees on Tuesday. They made the announcement that they were laying off about 20 percent of the newsroom of the 142-year-old tabloid.

This comes amid projections that the newspaper, if you can still call it that, will face yet another year of heavy losses to the tune of around $35 million a year and zero readership growth, according to the paper’s owner, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong.

So Dr. Soon-Shiong will possibly be Soon Gone as advertisers don't want to waste money on a no win situation for themselves.

But let's take a walk down Memory Lane and remember how the woke targeted non-college educated folks, particularly the miners whose jobs were lost due to woke policies starting with Obama whose plan was to destroy the coal industry altogether.

The left suggested the coal miners "learn to code," and anyone who loses their job because they didn't go to college should do the same.

I hope the staff takes their own advice now that they are in the same position.

And you know what--I don't have any tears to shed for them.

Tweet

Maddow has a cow over Trump's NH win

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow had a verbal hernia yesterday when it was obvious that former President Donald J. Trump trounced Nikki Haley in the New Hampshire primary. This makes it two-in-a-row for Trump and it makes Maddow nuts, in spite of her not needing much of a push to get over that hump. If mouths could have hernias, hers would be a double.

When Trump gave his victory speech on Tuesday evening, Maddow went into a state of deep depression, like when he won the Iowa caucuses and the far-left network cut him off without allowing their viewer to hear it. [No, not a typo.] 

The communist lesbian cut into the audio feed and began a sweaty "fact-checking" rant.  "This is what makes it hard to take him—his pronouncements—live."

Rather than actually showing an unbiased news report to their viewer, MSNBC has refused to give the former US President "an unfiltered live platform," because they need to censor what they don't want their viewer to see and hear.

"There is a cost to us as a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things," the leftist host said earlier in the month, as the fake news network cut away from the live footage of Trump. Then she lied and said that "[I]t's not out of spite." Well, perhaps it wasn't a lie--it was probably more out of hatred of Trump rather than simple spite. 

Maddow and Joy Reid, who now sports a Trump hairdo,  laughably attempted to characterize Trump as a senile old man in decline, while the characterize Biden as a Mensa maven.

Everything the left says is exactly the opposite of the facts.

Tweet

A pro-Hamasshole calls to 'normalize massacres' and London Bobbys respond

A pro-Hamasshole speaker issued a call to "normalize massacres" last week as the anti-Semites held a demonstration on Saturday. They are calling for Israel to ceasefire and let Hamas get a second crack at them as they promised. And if the second crack at killing all the Jews in Israel doesn't do the job, Hamassholes vow to keep the terrorism going. It's a religious calling, one might say.

Now police are looking into the matter after the march through central London took place as part of a global day of action against the Jews, or the Israeli military action against Hamas in Gaza, as they like to call their propaganda. 

Palestinian scumcrumpet Mohammed el-Kurd, addressed the crowd in Parliament Square.

"I dare you to look into the eyes of a Gazan child and tell him you tried your best," the Hamasshole supporter told the crowd. "Our day will come. But we must not be complacent. Our day will come. But we must normalize massacres as a status quo."

I dare anyone to look at the body of a beheaded Israeli baby, or the burnt bodies of civilians who were attacked on October 7. I dare anyone to look at the slaughter that took place that day, a horrific event that Hamas took video to show their families. I dare any of those creeps who call for the genocide of Jews to think about how they would feel if their mothers, sisters, wives and children were tortured, raped, burned and mutilated.

Sorry, this stuff gets me angry.

El-Kurd later responded to normal people pushing back hard about his statement regarding the normalization of massacres on X, writing that he "would never say that."

But he said it and too cowardly to stand behind his words. He was hoping for an all anti-Semite crowd.

"I was clearly saying we shouldn't be complacent, we shouldn't normalize massacres," he cowardly wrote. "Willfully distorting my words is an indication of your own bankruptcy. I'm allowed to misspeak. Also: idagf. Call the police! Write a Yelp review!"

If he dagf, he would not have responded so cowardly.

Anyway, London Bobbys posted a statement on X saying that authorities were aware of the video and the remarks.

"Officers are aware of the remarks, the commentary surrounding them and the subsequent statements issued by the speaker," Metropolitan Police said. "They are assessing the matter and as part of that assessment will be seeking to speak to the individual concerned."

The assessment might take years if I know London.

Despite claiming that he misspoke in that one instance, videos posted online show el-Kurd’s speech also directly called for Zionism to be extinguished from the world. Zionism of course is the Jews of the world. 

He's only going along with the Islamic scripture in the Qu'ran that actually calls for the killing of Jews and unbelievers. It's a hard truth but it's the truth, nevertheless:

The Quran God hates the non-Muslims (30.45, 60.4)
The Quran is against having Jews and Christians as friends, they are considered wrong doers (5.51)
The Quran calls Jews and Christians, the worst of creatures. (98.6)
The Quran is intolerant of other religions. (3.85, 3.19, 8.39, 48.28, 9.29)
The Quran God wants the Muslims to rule the earth. (24.55)

"Zionism is apartheid, it’s genocide, it’s murder, it’s a racist ideology rooted in settler expansion and racial domination, and we must root it out of the world," el-Kurd said, thinking it was "Backwards Monday."

He continued: "We must de-Zionise because Zionism is a death cult, Zionism is indefensible."

So what was October 7th, and who are Hamas? 

It seems that the Left and Islam hates it when the Jews fight back. 

No ceasefire until Hamas is eliminated from the Middle East.

Tweet

CRT training can violate federal law: Obama appointed judge rules

Judge Wendy Beetlestone of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, an Obama appointee, ruled on Jan. 11 that former Professor at Penn State, Zack De Piero had solid grounds to proceed in his race discrimination lawsuit over critical race theory trainings at Penn State Abington. 

De Piero said the trainings are anti-white and one stated that "White Teachers are a Problem," according to the lawsuit. He sued for race discrimination after he was allegedly subjected to training that the English language is racist and the embodiment of "White supremacy," as well as many other verbal assaults against White people in professional development sessions and meetings, according to court documents as reported by Fox News Digital. He explained in an interview with the outlet in a Wednesday interview that the trainings caused him trauma because he "cannot get them out of his head."

"There's a constant ticker tape, like a newsreel. I see, I hear that disgusting evil phrase. ‘White teachers are a problem,'" he told Fox News Digital. "I wish I could get it out of my head, but I can't."

"I still wake up with this stuff. I still go to bed with this stuff. It still bothers me. It's changed me in a lot of ways. You often hear that hardship leads to greater character. While that might be true, it certainly comes at a cost," he said.

Judge Beetlestone said that discussing the "influence of racism on our society does not violate federal law." But when considering whether to allow the professor's suit to progress, she considered the type of CRT training used at Penn State Abington.

"Training on concepts such as… critical race theory can contribute positively… to form a healthy and inclusive working environment," she said. "But the way these conversations are carried out in the workplace matters: When employers talk about race — any race — with a constant drumbeat of essentialist, deterministic, and negative language, they risk liability under federal law."

De Piero "was individually singled out for ridicule and humiliation because of the color of his skin," according to the original lawsuit filed by the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism (FAIR).

When he complained about the problem that he referred to as "the continuous stream of racial insult directed at White faculty," he was told by the director of the Affirmative Action office that "There is a problem with the White race."  The administrator went on to say that the professor should attend "antiracist" workshops "until you get it."

Had the shoe been on the other foot, and the word 'White' be substituted with 'Black,' anyone with a pulse would realize how racist that sounds--because it is.

Some of the workshops included a presentation captioned "White Teachers are a Problem," according to the lawsuit.

"I see this as an ideological mob that is hostile to free speech, civil discourse, true debate, empirical data," the professor said.

From this writer's perspective,  CRT and DEI are not only anti-White, but they infantilize Black people and do it at the expense of hard working Blacks, other people of color, and White folks, by demanding equal outcomes and not equal opportunities.

That on its face is racist.

His direct report in the English department, Liliana Naydan, "expressed her view that racism practiced against White faculty and students is legitimate," according to the lawsuit. Naydan did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

De Piero's lawsuit alleged that Naydan attempted to coerce school faculty to introduce equity into the grading process to ensure there were no disparities by "penaliz[ing] students academically on the basis of race." Which is, of course, the soft bigotry of low expectations, as Michael Gerson has pointed out.

Did I mention that this is racist policy?

Not surprisingly, the school refused to comment on "ongoing litigation," just like UPenn refused to comment on anti-Semitism as harassment and threats on campus.

Tweet

Rachel Maddow says USA doomed if Trump wins again: she's blowing smoke

It looks like the United States of America was able to sneak past destruction when former President Donald Trump was President Trump. We almost became the Untied States of America and only by incredible luck were we able to make it past the four years of his term. Thankfully, Joe Biden somehow pulled an historical number of votes from his nether regions to defeat him in the last election and win the presidency by a whisker.

At least that's what MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow [aka: Rachel Madcow] thinks. 

Maddow claimed Monday that Trump's re-election pitch is that he will end politics in the country if given the opportunity. 

Evidently, his former term as President proves her point. There were no wars started, the economy was getting into high gear, jobs were plentiful, and our enemies weren't doing enemy things. So Trump's track record somehow scares Maddow because he's Trump.

"Donald Trump is not leading the Republican Party and leading the Republican field of candidates because of his youthful vigor or because of his eloquence. None of that is going on," Maddow told Psaki, the former ginger White House press secretary for President Biden and her current colleague at MSNBC.

Biden, however, is leading the Democratic Party and his leftist colleagues because of his youthful vigor and eloquence, except when he can't walk up a flight of stairs, find his way offstage, or speak two sentences consecutively.

Maddow argued that Trump is increasingly being honest about his dictatorial ambitions to his base, [unlike Biden who never met an executive order he didn't override, or law he didn't uphold as dictator].

"What he's offering is what he both inherently offers and now, more and more, explicitly offers, which is that ‘if you pick me, that’s the end of politics,'" Maddow claimed.

The MSNBC anchor summarized the deal that American voters would get in the scenario that Trump wins the 2024 election and causes, in her view, the collapse of the American political system, because that's the tune the left always whistles to scare the public.

"You won't have to deal with politics anymore. You won't have to deal with contested elections. You won't have to deal with contests or divisions when it comes to power. You'll have a strongman leader, and I'll just do what I want. Won't that be a lot simpler?" Maddow said, paraphrasing Trump's re-election pitch, which she purposely takes out of context.

Doesn't Maddow understand the system of checks and balances and the fact that he was President once before and that didn't happen or even come close to happening? If he wins, he can only serve one term as President and there is no way he, or anyone in that position can become a dictator? 

"That's what he's offering," Maddow falsely claimed. "That strongman model is what the Republican base is enthused about. That sets him apart from every other Republican candidate. And I think that we're naive to think that he's tricking people into picking him and then surprised that he's going to act like a dictator."

"What's he's offering is strongman leadership, the end of politics, the end of elections" and the "sidelining" of major branches of government, like Congress and the Judiciary, Maddow said. "He'll be the man in charge and he'll get it done."

"That's what he's selling and that's what they're very eager to buy," she added, referring to Republican supporters of Trump who the Left gladly demonizes. 

Trump made it clear that he and the GOP are not planning to end democracy.

Trump said in a speech hosted by the New York Young Republican Club that claims that he is a threat to democracy are a "hoax" and a "new idea."

Trump went on to say that Democrats and the media "think the threat to democracy will save Biden from having created the worst inflation in our country's history, a fragile economy, that may soon end in a depression like 1929 … We are very, very close to a depression, the likes of which you have never seen. We owe $36 trillion and this guy has no clue."

All the Democrats have is fear and identity politics because their policies have only made things worse. Just visit California's big cities for starters.

Tweet

Black nat’l anthem to be sung at Super Bowl LVIII: there is some social media blowback

The National Football League announced that it intends to have something called the Black national anthem played before the game because the country isn't divided enough. Sure, former President Barack Hussein Obama tried his best to do the job, and to his creds, he almost completed his mission. But nothing comes close to finishing the job as to have a separate national anthem for people with darker skin from White people.

Of course we also should have an LGBTQI+1 anthem for those fine folks. And why not an Hispanic national anthem what with all the folks coming here from Spanish speaking countries? Asians too should have their own anthem, it's only fair.

The Black national anthem, "Lift Every Voice and Sing" needs a new title. How about "Lift Every Black Voice and Sing?" or "Lift Every Voice Except You Know Whose and Sing." 

"Lift Every Voice and Sing," has been played at every Super Bowl since Super Bowl LV and has stirred controversy on social media every time. This year, the NFL said the song will be performed by Grammy-winning R&B singer Andra Day.

The NFL started to play the Black national anthem in the 2020 season following the death of a Black thug named George Floyd who was being arrested by Minneapolis police officers. The incident started a wave of actions against racial injustice across the U.S. even though it was found that the officer who was pinning Floyd to the ground used proper police procedure. 

"Bro, we're American. Why tf do we need Lift Every Voice and Sing?" one NFL fan wrote in response to ESPN’s Adam Schefter’s post on the NFL’s announcement.

Conservative radio host Larry Elder was among others who spoke out.

"Sigh… While they’re at it, how about the University of Michigan fight song?" he posted on X.

Others on social media wondered what would happen if Americans had a "White national anthem." But race hustler Nikole Hannah-Jones claimed the U.S. already had a "White national anthem," which is racist on its face.

Tweet