Pro-Israel organization prepares list of pro-Hamassholes, hoping Trump will deport them

A pro-Israel organization, Betar, is compiling names of foreign students on visas in the US who spewed anti-Israel bile at campus protests — and is hoping President Trump will give the haters a one-way ticket back home.

So far, the group has about 30 names of students from countries like Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Canada, and the United Kingdom, currently studying at some of the nation's top universities, including Columbia, UPenn, Michigan, Syracuse, UCLA, The New School for Social Research, Carnegie Mellon, and George Washington University.

"We have started commencing lists of Jew-hating foreign nationals on visas who support Hamas," said Ross Glick, director of the US chapter of Betar.

The organization Betar is compiling lists of foreigners who have taken part in antisemitic protests on college campuses over the last year.

Betar has identified these individuals using a combination of facial recognition software and "relationship database technology" to sort out those who participated in antisemitic campus protests over the past year.

"One of our issues is processing power, there is just so much video to work through," Glick said.

Betar is already in touch with "prospective" Trump administration appointees in the Justice Department about the best way to act on those identified, Glick mentioned.

Among those on the list is Momodou Taal, a British national and PhD candidate in Africana studies at Cornell University, who was suspended twice for his involvement in two on-campus Palestinian protests, the most recent in September. University officials initially informed Taal that his F-1 visa might be revoked due to this incident, according to Newsweek. However, the Ivy League institution later reversed its decision.

Weeks after the Oct. 7 Hamas terror attack in Israel, Trump promised to deport foreign students who voiced support for radical Islamic terrorism. He repeated this promise to donors in May.

"When I am president we will not allow our colleges to be taken over by violent radicals. If you come from another country and try to bring jihadism or anti-Americanism or anti-Semitism to our campuses we will immediately deport you. You’ll be out of that school," Trump said at a rally that same month.

Said Glick: "We are strongly supportive of the Trump Administration’s plan to deport jihadis who seek to destroy America. Our campuses and our streets are filled with violent people who hate Jews and cannot coexist with Western society."

On Wednesday, Glick was on Capitol Hill, meeting with lawmakers including pro-Israel Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA). Glick was there to protest a Senate vote on whether to initiate an arms embargo against Israel.

Glick also met with aides to Republican Sens. Ted Cruz and James Lankford.

“They all gave me the thumbs up and told me how to follow up,” Glick said.

On the legislative side, Staten Island Representative Nicole Malliotakis presented a bill in February called the No Visas for Anti-Semitic Students Act. This bill aims to "revoke the visas of students who have engaged in antisemitic activities."

"Entering our country to attend one of our esteemed universities is a privilege, and foreign students who conduct antisemitic activity on our campuses should have their visas revoked," Malliotakis stated. "I'm pleased the Trump Administration plans to take immediate action to have these individuals removed."

Anti-Israel protest 4/30/24 by CUNY

Ross Glick, the leader of Betar US, has been actively meeting with lawmakers on Capitol Hill, including John Fetterman.

Betar doesn't avoid controversy.

The organization has been banned from using platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp because of a controversial jest about distributing beepers to members of a pro-Palestine group at the University of Pittsburgh. This was in reference to Israel's past use of beepers in a targeted attack against Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon.

The group's name, Betar, comes from the Betar fortress, a significant site during the Jewish-Roman wars of the second century. Betar was established in 1923 by Ze'ev Jabotinsky, an influential early Zionist leader.

Tweet

CRT training can violate federal law: Obama appointed judge rules

Judge Wendy Beetlestone of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, an Obama appointee, ruled on Jan. 11 that former Professor at Penn State, Zack De Piero had solid grounds to proceed in his race discrimination lawsuit over critical race theory trainings at Penn State Abington. 

De Piero said the trainings are anti-white and one stated that "White Teachers are a Problem," according to the lawsuit. He sued for race discrimination after he was allegedly subjected to training that the English language is racist and the embodiment of "White supremacy," as well as many other verbal assaults against White people in professional development sessions and meetings, according to court documents as reported by Fox News Digital. He explained in an interview with the outlet in a Wednesday interview that the trainings caused him trauma because he "cannot get them out of his head."

"There's a constant ticker tape, like a newsreel. I see, I hear that disgusting evil phrase. ‘White teachers are a problem,'" he told Fox News Digital. "I wish I could get it out of my head, but I can't."

"I still wake up with this stuff. I still go to bed with this stuff. It still bothers me. It's changed me in a lot of ways. You often hear that hardship leads to greater character. While that might be true, it certainly comes at a cost," he said.

Judge Beetlestone said that discussing the "influence of racism on our society does not violate federal law." But when considering whether to allow the professor's suit to progress, she considered the type of CRT training used at Penn State Abington.

"Training on concepts such as… critical race theory can contribute positively… to form a healthy and inclusive working environment," she said. "But the way these conversations are carried out in the workplace matters: When employers talk about race — any race — with a constant drumbeat of essentialist, deterministic, and negative language, they risk liability under federal law."

De Piero "was individually singled out for ridicule and humiliation because of the color of his skin," according to the original lawsuit filed by the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism (FAIR).

When he complained about the problem that he referred to as "the continuous stream of racial insult directed at White faculty," he was told by the director of the Affirmative Action office that "There is a problem with the White race."  The administrator went on to say that the professor should attend "antiracist" workshops "until you get it."

Had the shoe been on the other foot, and the word 'White' be substituted with 'Black,' anyone with a pulse would realize how racist that sounds--because it is.

Some of the workshops included a presentation captioned "White Teachers are a Problem," according to the lawsuit.

"I see this as an ideological mob that is hostile to free speech, civil discourse, true debate, empirical data," the professor said.

From this writer's perspective,  CRT and DEI are not only anti-White, but they infantilize Black people and do it at the expense of hard working Blacks, other people of color, and White folks, by demanding equal outcomes and not equal opportunities.

That on its face is racist.

His direct report in the English department, Liliana Naydan, "expressed her view that racism practiced against White faculty and students is legitimate," according to the lawsuit. Naydan did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

De Piero's lawsuit alleged that Naydan attempted to coerce school faculty to introduce equity into the grading process to ensure there were no disparities by "penaliz[ing] students academically on the basis of race." Which is, of course, the soft bigotry of low expectations, as Michael Gerson has pointed out.

Did I mention that this is racist policy?

Not surprisingly, the school refused to comment on "ongoing litigation," just like UPenn refused to comment on anti-Semitism as harassment and threats on campus.

Tweet

Israeli Defense Forces eliminated only 20% to 30% of Hamassholes

A Major Hamasshole Pastime

It looks like Israel has only eliminated between 20 and 30 percent of violent Hamasshole terrorists in Gaza, the Wall Street Journal reported Sunday. 

More needs to be done.

While the neutralizing of the Hamas anti-Semites make Harvard, UPenn, NYU, and MIT students [among many others] angry, it also makes a clear statement: Jews are not so easy to f*** with anymore. They will not march into the gas chambers without a fight. They will not stand by when the Jewish State is mercilessly attacked, their children murdered, beheaded, burned or taken hostage, raped, or mutilated, their women and men slaughtered merely for being Jewish.

But the anti-Semites are calling for a ceasefire by Israel, not so much for Hamas to do the same. The Jew-haters are claiming Israel is committing genocide in spite of the amazing growth of the people of Gaza from several hundred thousand to several million, while the Jewish populations across the Middle East has practically reached zero.

It's estimated that Hamas' numbers were about 30,000 terrorists. Last week, the IDF reported that about 9,000 of them had been killed.

It's a good start.

Am Yisrael Chai!

Tweet

Job-scared MIT president tap dances after anti-Semitic colleagues "resign"

The Stooges

Only now does the woke president of MIT want to take decisive actions against anti-Semitism. Now that she and two of her female school president colleagues shamefully testified in front of Congress about their respective school policies regarding harassment and threats, does Susan Kornbluth want to walk it back and pretend she isn't woke, isn't willing to swallow her own Jewish background for the religion of the left.

Unless you've recently returned from a trip to the International Space Station, you know about the situation whereby Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) asked the presidents of Harvard, University of Pennsylvania, and MIT if calling for the genocide of Jews constituted a violation of their school's policy. This comes after the October 7 barbaric attack on Israel that killed over 1,200 Israelis. 

Not one of them had the guts to agree that it was harassment to call for the genocide of all the Jews, which obviously goes against their respective schools' policies. Jewish students had to lock themselves away from the pro-Hamassholes banging on the doors trying to get at them.

Liz Magill of UPenn was the first to resign after various wealthy alumni refused to donate to the schools in the future. And while most of them were Jewish, there was a significant number who aren't but refused to go along with the Hamasshole-supporting left.

So Magill "resigned" and just this week Gay of Harvard also resigned, but she did it without the insight and class that a person in that position ought to show. Instead, she chalked it up, not to her alleged plagiarism, her anemic academic publications that were also likely plagiarized, and her Capitol Hill performance, instead, she pulled the race card from her nether regions where Al Sharpton keeps his, and blamed it on her skin color.

Now MIT's Kornbluth is promising to take "proactive measures" to combat anti-Semitism wherever she finds it on campus. 

If a Jew is hiding behind a tree she will not call for a Muslim to come and kill him, instead she will take measures to protect his right to not be killed because with Magill and Gay gone, she's a changed woman.

“We have been listening to our community and working steadily for many weeks to identify the issues that most urgently need our attention,” Kornbluth wrote in a letter to the school. “As we begin this new year, I want to name the challenges I’m seeing and hearing about, and put us on a path to solving them together.”

Is she freaking kidding? She had to listen to her community to know right from wrong; good from evil? Anti-Semitism isn't new at MIT and it certainly isn't new at Harvard and UPenn. Their racism is historic and it isn't going to go away with committees Kornbluth now wants to form.

She didn't just wake up to these problems--she's part of the problem and houses must be cleaned of this dirt.

Two down, one to go--at least for now.

Tweet

Ousted UPenn''s board chair says donors shouldn't have say in policy even though that's isn't why they pulled donations

Scotty Bok, the UPenn's ousted board chairman says that donors shouldn't have a say in school functions after several of the wealthy businessman donors withdrew their donations to the anti-Semitic school after Jew-hatred incidents occurred on campus and their now ousted president Liz Magill, refused to say whether calling for Jewish genocide constituted harassment or threats, claiming that it depended on the context or behavior. 

Liz Magill

Of course, this all came after the October 7 attack by Hamassholes on Israelis in their beds that killed over 1,200 men, women and children in a single day. It also came after repeated incidents of context and behavior of anti-Semites on campus threatening, harassing and intimidating Jewish students.

But Bok fails to see the reality of the situation. He thinks they withheld their funds in order to get the school to do something about Jew hatred, not because they personally found the hypocrisy of Magill and the school in general when it comes to the Jewish students. 

Use the wrong pronoun some woke student insists you call him or her, you're in trouble. Make a racist remark about any other group beside Jews, you're in trouble. Misgender a mentally ill male student who thinks he's a girl, or a female student who thinks she's a boy, you're in trouble. Call out "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" and you're in the club.

“I think donors are absolutely free to give to whatever organizations they want or not to, and to withhold for any reason they choose to,” Bok told Bloomberg TV.

“But they are not shareholders so I don’t think they should have a particularly loud voice on how universities are run.”

Donors don't want a say in how the school should be run--they want a say in how it should not be run, what should not be permissible. They don't even complain about the school's useless gender studies curriculum and have remained silent on the DEI hiring practices. But for the donors, a substantial number who are Jewish, donating to such a school was too much to expect.

Tweet

Billionaire Harvard donor not donating to Harvard after Gay went neo-Nazi in. Congressional hearing

"I have not yet begun to fight"

Jewish billionaire Len Blavatnik and his family foundation have donated over $270,000,000 to Harvard University in the past. Now that Harvard's affirmative action president Claudine Gay has come out as a plagiaristic Jew-hater the philanthropist has decided to stop shelling out money to an organization that refuses to condemn genocide against Jews, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday.

Ukrainian-born Blavatnik, is worth over $31 billion and Harvard would clearly like to keep getting his monetary support in order to push DEI and other woke bull crap, but refusing to label the call for genocide against the Jewish people harassment or bullying under Harvard's policies, when misgendering a person or saying there are two genders is grounds for expulsion, is a bridge too far for Blavatnik.

He is only the latest donor to close his wallet in protest after Gay refused to call out genocide when she along with the other two stooges basically mouthed the same claims that it all depended upon the "context" and "behavior."

"The problem Harvard has is that all their sources of revenue are strained," David Bergeron told Bloomberg. He is a former deputy assistant secretary in the U.S. Education Department. "Their ability to raise money is clearly strained and their ability to leverage federal programs is potentially at risk."

Gay is facing pressure to resign not only for her antisemitic leanings, but also her alleged plagiarism that has now been growing like a tumor.

Bill Ackman, another billionaire investor and influential Harvard alum, is pushing for the university to fire so called Doctor Gay, claiming her handling of antisemitism on campus since the Oct. 7 terrorist attack by Hamas on Israel has cost the university more than a billion dollars in donations.

However, Harvard and a number of other top universities, receive bribe money from the Middle East to gain influence on what is being taught, so it isn't as if all funding for Harvard is going to dry up; and they still have an enormous tuition income. They'll continue to get foreign funding, but the cut-off of private money is bound to hurt.

Fox Business reported that in a letter to Harvard's governing boards of directors posted on X Sunday, Ackman argued Gay "has done more damage to the reputation" of the institution than any other individual in its nearly 500-year history, going through a litany of criticisms over her leadership which he says has contributed to major donors withdrawing significant gifts that are adding up.

"President Gay’s failures have led to billions of dollars of cancelled, paused, and withdrawn donations to the university," Ackman wrote. "I am personally aware of more than a billion dollars of terminated donations from a small group of Harvard’s most generous Jewish and non-Jewish alumni."

Ackman added, "I have been copied and blind copied on numerous letters and emails to the University from alums who have written scathing letters to Gay and/or the Board withdrawing donations."

Ackman called for the resignations of all three stooges: UPenn's Liz Magill (who finally "resigned"), Sally Kornbluth of MIT, and the present stooge discussed here. The three of them refused to say that calling for genocide of the Jews on their campuses violated the rules and amounted to harassment.

One down and two to go.

Tweet

"Doctor" Gay's continued clusterfrack from her Congressional testimony

Claudine Gay: anti-Semite and alleged plagiarist

Ever since the "Three Stooges of Ivy" testified before Congress, people are taking sides. The anti-Semites, media and useful idiots on one side, and decent, fair-minded people on the other.

Since their testimony Liz Magill, former President of the University of Pennsylvania had to resign, and now two stooges remain: Claudine Gay of Harvard University and Sally Kornbluth of MIT. For now, Gay seems to be the next school president in the public crosshairs.

The law firm Edelson PC has ended recruiting at Harvard Law School due to Gay's disgusting testimony whereby she argued that context was required to determine whether calls for Jewish genocide violated the school's bullying and harassment policies. We know that misgendering a person or using the wrong pronouns does, but hey, this is about those, you know, Joooze.

NEW: Edelson PC, a major law firm, will no longer participate in on-campus interviews at Harvard Law School due to Claudine Gay’s Congressional testimony.

“Dr. Gay was in a position to help lead the country. She did the very opposite,” writes founder and CEO Jay Edelson: pic.twitter.com/aTWhX62BKL— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) December 16, 2023

Anyway, the firm’s CEO Jay Edelson announced the change in a Dec. 14 letter to the Law School’s director of recruitment and operations, Jesse Ohrenberger.

“We, along with the rest of the nation, observed Dr. Claudine Gay’s testimony before Congress, wherein she refused to unequivocally state that advocating for genocide would breach the school’s code of conduct,” Edelson wrote. “In light of these events, we have made the difficult decision to discontinue our participation in on-campus interviews.”

Edelson’s decision came "despite [Gay's] belated [bull-crap] apology."

"[T]he gravity of her initial response cannot be overlooked. As an expert in political and social studies, Dr. Gay certainly knew to expect the types of questions that would be asked of her," Edelson's letter stated.

The issue regarding Gay's alleged dissertation plagiarism was not addressed by Edelson nor was the fact that she appears to be an affirmative action hire.

He noted that the firm’s move will not punish students. Rather than recruiting on campus, they committed to "exploring alternative channels to connect with those students interested in opportunities at Edelson PC, ensuring that our actions are directed appropriately at the administration and do not penalize students for matters beyond their control."

When asked about the allegations regarding plagiarism, Gay said, "I have not yet begun to fight. I shall fight them on the beaches. I shall fight them on the landing grounds. I shall fight them in the fields and in the streets. I will fight them in the cities. I will never surrender!" she said.

Tweet

Magill resigns as UPenn President--time to clean the ivy from the houses

The smirk says it all

New York Congresswoman, Elise Stefanik (R-NY) applauded the resignation of Liz Magill of UPenn who resigned from the post on Saturday for refusing to condemn anti-Semitism as a form of harassment against Jewish students. 

Magill, along with ivy league school presidents Clauding Gay, of Harvard and Sally Kornbluth, of MIT, testified at a Congressional hearing on Tuesday where Rep. Stefanik asked Magill if "calling for the genocide of Jews violate[s] Penn’s rules or code of conduct? Yes or no?"

L to R: Fraus Magill, Gay, Kornbluth

"If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment, yes," Magill responded, later adding, "It is a context-dependent decision."

"This is unacceptable. Ms. Magill, I’m gonna give you one more opportunity for the world to see your answer. Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Penn’s code of conduct when it comes to bullying and harassment? Yes or no?" Stefanik then asked.

Magill and the rest of her cohorts did a River Dance around the question and refused to condemn the anti-Semitism that runs rampant at her school and the others, where Jewish students have to fear for their safety, and in at least one case at UPenn, had to lock themselves in a room to avoid have violence perpetrated against them.

Rep. Stefanik applauded the resignation of University of Magill on Saturday after hearing about the resignation. 

Rep. Elise Stefanik

"One down. Two to go," Stefanik posted to X Saturday. "This is only the very beginning of addressing the pervasive rot of antisemitism that has destroyed the most "prestigious" higher education institutions in America. This forced resignation of the president of @Penn is the bare minimum of what is required. These universities can anticipate a robust and comprehensive Congressional investigation of all facets of their institutions negligent perpetration of antisemitism including administrative, faculty, funding, and overall leadership and governance."

"@Harvard and @MIT do the right thing. The world is watching," she added.

Board of Trustees Chairman Scott L. Bok wrote in a statement Saturday that Magill has resigned.

"I write to share that President Liz Magill has voluntarily tendered her resignation as President of the University of Pennsylvania. She will remain a tenured faculty member at Penn Carey Law," Bok wrote.

So yes, it's one down, two to go, but let's not stop there. Many schools across the country are allowing blatant anti-Semitism to fester like puss pimples on the butts of the women of the Squad. It's ugly and has no place in the world's greatest nation.

And closing the borders might be a good start to deal with part of the problem too.

Tweet

Harvard president suddenly feels "regret" for her testimony before Congress

Harvard President Claudine Gay testified before Congress Tuesday and now feels sorry for the blowback she's gotten after anti-Semitic remarks she made on antisemitism. [H/T Fox News]

"I am sorry. Words matter." the obvious anti-Semite said in an interview with The Harvard Crimson on Thursday regarding her testimony.

"When words amplify distress and pain, I don’t know how you could feel anything but regret," she said, in an attempt to keep her job. 

On Tuesday, Gay sat before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce to discuss antisemitism and threats against Jewish students on Harvard’s campus. She, like her two colleague clowns from MIT and UPenn, refused to say that the genocidal chants and threats students made against Jews should be considered harassment because of "context," and for some reason she now claims to be sorry.

During an exchange with Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), she was asked whether calling for the genocide of Jews on campus violates the university’s codes of conduct related to bullying and harassment.

Gay said it would depend on the "context" of the incident. That is, if the harassment happened to be against black, Muslims, LGBTQ, or other "disenfranchised" groups, then yes, it would be harassment and should result in serious consequences for the perpetrators. But in this case, it's about those, you know, the Jews. They think they're so great with their Albert Einstein and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, but they're not.

When asked to give a yes or no answer, Gay said antisemitic speech could warrant action from Harvard if the conduct crosses into bullying, harassment and intimidation.

Stefanik again pressed Gay to provide a simple yes or no response.

"Again, it depends on the context," Gay said.

Rep. Stefanik said on Fox News' "Faulkner Focus" Wednesday that she was "shaken" after the three stooges who refused to state that calling for Jewish genocide would violate their respective university codes of conduct.

ELISE STEFANIK: I've been in a number of very high-profile congressional hearings over the years and the pathetic moral depravity on display by the witnesses, the three university presidents from Harvard, M.I.T and Penn. I've never witnessed anything like that. And I asked the question in such a way that it was easy. Yes, that calling for the genocide of Jews, in fact, does violate their policies and code of conduct when it comes to bullying and harassment. And their answers were pathetic. I was so shaken and what was probably the most tragic aspect of the hearing to me was there were a number of Jewish students from those schools in the audience sitting behind them. And to watch just the fear as they're listening to the presidents of these universities fail to answer a basic question of moral clarity. It was abysmal. They don't deserve the dignity of resigning. They need to be fired.

Following the well-deserved blasting Gay received on social media, she tried convincing us that some had "confused" a right to free expression with the notion that Harvard condones "calls for violence against Jewish students."

"Let me be clear: Calls for violence or genocide against the Jewish community, or any religious or ethnic group are vile, they have no place at Harvard, and those who threaten our Jewish students will be held to account," she blathered.

Gay further clarified her comments during her interview with the Crimson.

"I got caught up in what had become at that point, an extended, combative exchange about policies and procedures," Gay said. "What I should have had the presence of mind to do in that moment was return to my guiding truth, which is that calls for violence against our Jewish community — threats to our Jewish students — have no place at Harvard and will never go unchallenged. Substantively, I failed to convey what is my truth."

Whenever anyone uses the words 'my truth,' they are lying by implying their beliefs comport with reality. People use that term to absolve themselves of wrongdoing. There is only 'truth,' and it doesn't belong to anyone--it's fact. 

All of three presidents who testified on Capitol Hill, and all others who refuse to hold those students who hate and make threats of genocide, need to be fired.

Tweet

UPenn loses $100,000,000 donation after Magill's congressional testimony

Frau Elizabeth Magill

University of Pennsylvania President Elizabeth Magill, along with Harvard President Claudine Gay and MIT President Sally Kornbluth testified before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. Each one of these bozos had similar prepared answers to the question posed by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) as to whether calling for the death of Jews went against the harassment policies of their respective schools. Each said, in effect, that it depended upon the context and whether the harassment went against an individual.

It was obvious that they were coached as to what to say and it was both cold and disgusting to hear them each refuse to admit what a 3-year-old could answer correctly. Not only that, but if the "context" was about black people or LGBTQ people, people would be expelled, if not indeed incarcerated.

So people chanting and calling for the genocide of Jews must be explored under an academic microscope because these three universitards are too simpleminded to recognize neo-Nazi and Islamic rhetoric in front of their smug faces.

That smugness and refusal to protect Jewish students has  cost UPenn $100 million (via Axios):

A UPenn donor is withdrawing a gift worth around $100 million to protest the school's response to antisemitism on campus. [With such a strong move, you might think the next thing to happen is for the school to forbid men to compete against women in sports.]

The final straw for Ross Stevens, founder and CEO of Stone Ridge Asset Management, was fed up with Tuesday's widely criticized congressional testimony by Penn's president Magill.

The gift from Stevens, a Penn undergrad alum, was given in December 2017 to help establish a center for innovation in finance. It was in the form of limited partnership units in Stone Ridge, with the current value estimated at around $100 million.

Stevens, in a letter from his lawyers to Penn, alleges that the school has violated the terms of the limited partnership agreement, including its anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies.

"Its permissive approach to hate speech calling for violence against Jews and laissez faire attitude toward harassment and discrimination against Jewish students would violate any policies of rules that prohibit harassment and discrimination based on religion, including those of Stone Ridge," Stevens wrote.

Magill has the constitutional right to say whatever she wants and defend her belief that Jews should all die, and Ross Stevens has the same right stand by his moral principals and refuse to support the school that holds the genocidal hatred. 

So UPenn can keep Magill on board as their president, but they should not expect decent people to support the school. Hopefully, this will carry over to every university and academic institution that supports hatred of any group of individuals.

Context? Schmontext. 

Tweet

Ivy League Presidents try damage control after anti-Semitic testimonies

L to R: Frau Magill, Frau Gay, Frau Kornbluth [photo: Babylon Bee]

Question: What’s the difference between a lightbulb and a prostitute?

Answer: You can unscrew a lightbulb.

The presidents of Harvard, and UPenn made a feeble attempt at damage control after they testified on Capitol Hill for the House Committee on Education and the Workplace on Tuesday regarding anti-Semitism at their respective schools of leftist learning and along with the president of MIT came off with talking points that were obviously prearranged, perhaps by a legal team. But they received tons of negative feedback from the public and knew they were screwed.

Harvard President Claudine Gay, MIT President Sally Kornbluth, and University of Pennsylvania President Elizabeth Magill each testified and when Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) asked them whether the call for genocide and mass violence against Jews would be considered a violation of harassment and bullying policies of their schools, she was stunned by the responses she received.

[H/T Townhall.com]

They tried to play it off as free speech and as long as nobody acted out on it, no foul, no harm. It all "depends on the context," or "when speech crosses into conduct."

What a load of crap. Put the shoe on the other foot and see how they would have responded if, say, genocide of blacks or gays was called for by students. You don't have to imagine the response because it's obvious.

Their prepared answers and failure to  "answer with moral clarity" shocked both those on the left and the right.

This is a question a child could answer, unless the child grew up in Gaza, perhaps.

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, was livid.

White House spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement on Wednesday, “It’s unbelievable that this needs to be said: calls for genocide are monstrous and antithetical to everything we represent as a country. Any statements that advocate for the systematic murder of Jews are dangerous and revolting — and we should all stand firmly against them, on the side of human dignity and the most basic values that unite us as Americans.

“It should not be hard to condemn genocide, genocide against Jews, genocide against anyone else,” he told reporters. “I’ve said many times, leaders have a responsibility to speak and act with moral clarity, and Liz Magill failed to meet that simple test. There should be no nuance to that — she needed to give a one-word answer,” he added.

By Wednesday afternoon, a petition calling for Ms. Magill’s resignation had grown to more than 3,000 signatures. Marc Rowan, the chief of Apollo Global Management and the board chair at the Wharton School of Business at Penn, asked the board of trustees to rescind their support for Ms. Magill.

“How much damage to our reputation are we willing to accept?” he wrote in a letter to the trustees.

Governor Shapiro, who is a nonvoting member of Penn’s board, urged the trustees to meet soon.

University sources, speaking on background, said that efforts were underway to hold a board meeting by phone this week. The university did not respond immediately to a request for comment. [...]

One can imagine people in the Middle East scrambling to deal with damage control.

Bill Ackman, the billionaire hedge fund manager and Harvard alumnus, called on all three presidents to resign, citing the exchanges over genocide.

“It ‘depends on the context’ and ‘whether the speech turns into conduct,’ that is, actually killing Jews,” he wrote on X. “This could be the most extraordinary testimony ever elicited in the Congress.”

“They must all resign in disgrace,” he continued. “If a CEO of one of our companies gave a similar answer, he or she would be toast within the hour.” 

With so many calls to resign, Gay and Magill did damage control on Wednesday.

“In that moment, I was focused on our university’s longstanding policies aligned with the U.S. Constitution, which say that speech alone is not punishable, [blah, blah, blah]” Magill said in a video statement. “I was not focused on, but I should have been, the irrefutable fact that a call for genocide of Jewish people is a call for some of the most terrible violence human beings can perpetrate. It’s evil — plain and simple.”

Her Peter Strzok smile no longer seen on her face as she put on a serious demeanor and faked sincerity.

She went on to say she believed "it would be harassment or intimidation" and said Penn is initiating "a serious and careful look at our policies."

While donors may stop donating to these institutes of wokeism, unless something is done about stopping federal funding and foreign donations, nothing is going to change.

Tweet

UPenn donors cutting ties with the university due to anti-Semitism

Rogers Waters and UPenn President Liz Magill

Donors are no longer donating, not even a donut, to the University of Pennsylvania after the university president Liz Magill made squishy statements about the Hamasshole terrorist attacks on Israeli citizens on October 7th.

Hedge fund executive David Magerman and investor Jonathan Jacobson, have made reference to Magill's response late last month to the Palestine Writes festival to which the school played host.

Magerman tweeted:

“I am deeply ashamed of my association with the University of Pennsylvania. I refuse to donate another dollar to Penn. There is no action anyone at Penn can take to change that.”

And Jacobson wrote:

“Enough. It is time to reverse this trend and restore our ‘elite’ universities to the principles upon which they were founded: as places of inquiry, where lively debate, diversity of opinion and communication across lines of difference is not only cherished, but actually mandated."

Jacobson pledged a single dollar for every year Magill remains employed by the school.

Magill suddenly became the purveyor of free speech saying the university "fiercely support[s] the free exchange of ideas as central to our educational mission."

Exceptions do exist, however, when she tried to set a precedent by yanking tenure away from one of its own professors for her politically incorrect statements.

No, Magill draped herself in the mantle of free expression as the school played host over the weekend to the Palestine Writes festival, which included a gaggle of anti-Semites. Among them was the former Pink Floyd frontman Roger Waters, who has donned Nazi regalia and hung an inflatable pig adorned with a Jewish star from the rafters at his concerts.

Ironically, Waters worships pigs.

Magill said in her statement that "many have raised deep concerns" about the anti-Semitic views of some of the speakers, but failed to mention that she obviously shares them.

Meanwhile, the atmosphere on campus in Philadelphia is such that, in the past week, the university Chabad's sukkah and Hillel buildings were vandalized, and a swastika was found at a university building.

Why is it that the university supports free speech by anti-Semites but not by controversial tenured professors who they tried to fire?

Christopher Eisgruber, president of Princeton University pledged to "stand up against racism, wherever and whenever we encounter it," but kept his mouth shut when members of his own faculty welcomed an anti-Semite to campus. 

It's a waste of time to make this argument to Jew-haters. There's really no convincing them how evil they are because they never see themselves as such. If they can support Hamas after what they did, well there is nothing anyone can say.

Is the USA slowly becoming Nazi Germany of World War Two?

Comment, please.

Tweet

A man does not win NCAA's "Woman of the Year" for some reason

Thomas answers the question: "How many testicles do you sport?"

Lia [formally Will] Thomas may have changed his name and swimming status, but he has not changed his biological sex, his genital gear [twig and berries], and his XY chromosome combination that is present in every cell in his body. According to some female swimmers, Thomas hasn't even changed his sexual attraction to women. He has merely changed what he claims to be: a female.

Thomas swam as a male up until his senior year for the University of Pennsylvania. He finished out his senior year on the women's team and although he was a mediocre male swimmer, he destroyed the women with his race times. That's because he is a man and thus has bigger lung capacity, strength, wingspan, and he even has his own built-in rudder.

Thomas was nominated by UPenn earlier this month but since rejected as the Ivy League's nominee for the NCAA's "Woman of the Year." The award recognizes "female student-athletes who have exhausted their eligibility and distinguished themselves in their community, in athletics and in academics throughout their college careers.” 

But Lia Thomas is not a female no matter what he claims but he sure as hell is a narcissistic, selfish piece of crap for beating up on women athletes who excel in their category.

The Ivy League, comprised of Penn, Brown University, Columbia University, Cornell University, Dartmouth College, Harvard University, Princeton University and Yale University, chose as its nominee fencing champion Sylvie Binder of Columbia University/Barnard College, because she actually is a woman and knows it.

Binder, who hails from Armonk, New York, is a three-time first team all-American who won the NCAA women’s foil title in 2019, and the bronze medal in 2018 and 2022. She finished her undergraduate college education with a 3.91 grade point average. Not too shabby.

In her bio after winning a Leadership and Excellence Award, Binder wrote, “To my family and their unconditional love and support for the past 5 years: Dad, Mom, Abby, and Zach, I owe it all to you.”

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

And for all the podium losses NCAA women lost unfairly, they owe it all to Lia Thomas. A dude, not good enough to compete successfully against other dudes. 

The NCAA needs to do some soul-searching of their own to have allowed a man to compete against women in the first place.

Tweet

Ex-UPenn teammate says trans swimmer Lia Thomas is 'mentally ill'

Mr. Thomas beats women

Well, it isn't just conservative writers saying that gender dysphoric [aka transgender] swimmer Lia Thomas, formerly William Thomas, is mentally ill. 

The woman who remains anonymous in fear of repercussions and possible violence done to her, was clear that Thomas, a man who thinks he's a woman, or at least claims to think he's a woman, said the controversial athlete is "mentally ill," making her statement in an exclusive interview with Christopher Tremoglie of the Washington Examiner.

The anonymous former teammate was speaking in response to a recent interview Thomas had with "Good Morning America." Thomas, a man with his junk still intact, was allowed to beat women--I mean compete against women on the UPenn women's swim team in his senior year in college. He claims he make-believe change [aka transitioning, a fake term] brought him true happiness.

Rumor has it that Thomas still digs the women but can't admit it because they might take his record-smashing medals away when he beat the second place actual woman by 38 seconds and set all kinds of NCAA records in the women's swim division.

The anonymous teammate scoffed at Thomas' claim about his true happiness in the Examiner interview:

"You can tell he is mentally ill. I saw the video and was so disgusted.

"Lia identified as a woman, but she is not a female. That is a fact. It doesn't matter how you feel."

Yes, boys have penises and girls have vaginas. Lia Thomas does not have a vagina, so do the math.

Pressed to further explain her comments, the anonymous woman said that Thomas “was not grounded in reality and was instead so consumed with his own life that he failed to acknowledge any damage he inflicted upon his real female teammates.” The psychological term for this is probably narcissism, I have not diagnosed him, but you can call it sucking.

The woman pointed out how Mr. Thomas damaged women's sports and basically stolen opportunities from real women swimmers, such as his teammates and rival women from competing universities. “Lia's experience was his alone, and many suffered so that he could benefit,” Tremoglie wrote in recounting the interviewee's sentiments.

The ex-teammate of Thomas expressed how upset she was about his glib attitude about taking a woman’s spot on the team and the winner’s stand. She said multiple team members felt the same way.

But if you think Lia Thomas sucks, don't forget the fact that the NCAA went along with this woke bull crap.

The interviewee also pointed out Thomas' lack of empathy and concern for the women "forced to sacrifice their rights to happiness." And these women were uncomfortable with a man in their locker room who flaunted his penis and testicles. They questioned why their happiness was discounted.

What I don't understand is why would any woman agree to compete against a man in any sporting event that requires either strength, speed, or both. 

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

In swimming, for example, imagine the impact they would have if they all just stood on the starting platform and let the guy swim his balls off. I realize they would worry that they would be sacrificing scholarships or professional status, but if they all did it, men like Thomas would look like selfish fools and the women would be making a powerful statement that might just give them the results they deserve.

Lia Thomas is a horrible, mentally ill man who, I suspect, hates women at a deep level and has the self-awareness of a guppy. 

Tweet

Gender dysphoric Lia Thomas wants to go to the Olympics and compete against women

Lia Thomas [aka "Tommy Boy"] the former UPenn swimmer says that guys who swim against women are "not a threat to women's sports" because it's clothing that makes the man, or woman. And he plans to wear women's swimsuits so it's okay.

Now Tommy Boy who didn't do so well for 3 years on the men's UPenn swim team and transitioned to the women's team says he has his eyes set on the Olympics where he plans to compete against the fairer sex.

He sat down with ABC News' Juju Chang for his first tv interview to talk about his season in which it was like taking candy from a girl baby in the swim meets. He is the first man to win a Division 1 national title against women, and if this continues to be allowed, either he won't be the last guy to do it, or the women's swim teams in collegiate sports will be dismantled and likely become a memory in the field of women's sports.

"I knew there would be scrutiny against me if I competed as a woman," Lia, [formally William] said. "I was prepared for that but I also don’t need anybody's permission to be myself and do the sport I love," he said, not realizing that thinking he is  not a woman, therefore he is not actually being himself. He is being a turd with an unfair biological advantage who competes against women.

He went on with the interview telling Juju about his victimhood as a gender dysphoric man who claims to believe he's a woman but I don't believe him.  Lucky for him that he has the biological advantages in having the strength and speed that give him the ability to steal first place, and the wisdom to know when to allow women to win and make him appear to be on equal footing.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

It's disgusting how the college sports world allows this to continue. Perhaps there should be a separate category for gender dysphoric men and women. But you will likely not see transgender "men" compete against men in sports requiring strength and speed, and if you do, don't expect them to do so great.

I don't mean to imply that gender dysphoria isn't a real problem nor that those who suffer from it should have no rights. But rights go both ways. You could say rights are 'bi'.

Tweet

Male swimmer tied for 5th place against the women in the 200

Lia Thomas, formerly known as Will Thomas, is a man who swims on the women's UPenn swim team because he says that he identifies as a woman in spite of the fact that he is a guy with a penis and testicles and confessed to a team member that he sexually attracted to women.

Anyway, the dude is competing against women in Atlanta at the women's swimming and diving national championships and was unable to beat 5 women in the 200-yard freestyle final. He came in tied for 5th place with a time of 143.40 which, had he competed against fellow fellows, would have likely put him much deeper at the end of the pack.

A video taken by Fox News Digital shows Thomas getting leaving the pool after his mediocre finish and one can see that he was being ignored by the women who competed as they cheer and hug each other after the event. As he walks alone with his cap and balls, passing several women who do not acknowledge his existence the loud cheers are a reminder that Lia Thomas is not well received by his women competitors because he is, after all is said and done, a man who is capitalizing on his biological advantages and still cannot beat the fastest women in the sport.

Even the crowd was a lot quieter when he was announced prior to the race, and after when the race officials announced the results.

But to has masculine credit, Thomas won the women's national championship in the 500-yard freestyle and has become the first man to do so.

Sadly, even Fox News refers to his pronouns as "she," and "her" obviously lacking the courage to challenge the left's narrative that a man can be a woman by mind shifting or some such baldersnatch. 

Thomas began competing for the University of Pennsylvania in the women's events this year after three years of racing against his own gender and not being as successful because he isn't that fast as his male competition. So he evidently decided that if he says he's a she, he would kick butt in the water.

The fact that the NCAA allows this nonsense and denial of biological advantages a man generally has over women in sports, is disgusting. And the fact that the women who compete against this charlatan do not stand up for themselves and refuse to compete against him, is sad. 

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Imagine that, when the starting gun goes off and all the women remain on their starting platforms just watching Thomas swim alone, the effect it would have on the NCAA. It's a risk but courage requires risk.

Mr. Thomas will compete in the 100-yard freestyle on Saturday. 

Tweet

Former conservative Matt Schlapp defends transgender narrative in Lia Thomas' sports competition

The chairman of the American Conservative Union (ACU) went on Twitter to say that male swimmer Lia Thomas, who changed his name from Will Thomas, [and thereby magically became a female] "deserves our compassion," rather than the women with whom he competed and easily defeated in swimming competitions. 

Thomas went from the men's swim team at UPenn to the women's team at the school and as a man with XY chromosomes and a penis which he proudly has no qualms to display in the ladies locker room, has smashed the existing female swimming records of the school. When he swam against men, he was mediocre at best and placed 554 nationally in the 200 freestyle. He also scores in the mid-500s in other events against men.

According to an anonymous female on the UPenn team, Thomas admitted that he is still sexually attracted to women, not men, so it's obvious that he's a disgusting, selfish prick who doesn't care that he's competing unfairly and possibly taking away the chances of other women to compete at higher levels in their category. If there's anyone who deserves our compassion, it's the women, not the dude known as Lia Thomas.

Matt Schlapp shared a New York Post article about Thomas pushing back against his critics on March 6th. The ACU chairman captioned the article, “No matter what one thinks of Lia’s ability to swim with women her story deserves our compassion. It will be interesting to hear Lia’s pov in 30 years.”

Her story? WTF?

Referring to Thomas as "her" is giving in to the narrative that he's a female and going along with the Left.

No matter what one thinks of Lia’s ability to swim with women her story deserves our compassion. It will be interesting to hear Lia’s pov in 30 years. https://t.co/NLY9f6TO6I

Sorry Mr. Schlapp, I have more compassion for the women who have to put up with Thomas exposing his bat and balls in the lady's locker room and his self-serving behavior. I have absolutely no compassion for him and I believe Schlapp showed his lack of backbone in an attempt to show his virtue.

The editor-in-chief of Swimming World Magazine wrote that the “numbers paint a clear picture” when Thomas competed as a male versus competing now as a female, highlighting the existence of a serious advantage Thomas has over the women he’s competing against.

“The fact that the University of Pennsylvania swimmer has soared from a mid-500s ranking (554th in the 200 freestyle) in men’s competition to the top-ranked swimmer in women’s competition tells the story of the unfairness which is unfolding at the NCAA level.”

Schlapp received some well-deserved pushback on social media. John Cardillo, a former Newsmax host wrote:

“No Matt. HIS story deserves no compassion. He’s a spoiled brat ruining college sports for his female teammates and competitors. I have compassion for them and want to hear their stories. You establishment ‘conservatives’ will cave every single time.”

Cardillo nailed it with the last sentence.

Matt Walsh of the Daily Wire echoed my sentiment:

No, it doesn’t. Also if you’re playing the “preferred pronoun” game you’ve already lost. You’ve surrendered reality to the Left. There is nothing left to fight for. https://t.co/TDHr40Ylmw

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) March 8, 2022

As did Erick Erickson:

*His* story. And while the dude is clearly going through a mental struggle for which we should show concern, we should have more empathy and concern for the girls who are being ignored and pushed aside by the elite so a stronger guy can pose as a girl. https://t.co/iAHtwA54MF

— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) March 8, 2022

Here's more:

Really. Her? When men are infiltrating girls’ and women’s teams, bathrooms, locker rooms, prisons, and abuse shelters, this is the approach? https://t.co/KPCM7uTRdL

— Allie Beth Stuckey (@conservmillen) March 8, 2022

Matt has FIVE daughters… Would he feel it’s compassionate if a biological male with male genitalia were in the locker room with them against their consent? https://t.co/KrHr8OLJfK

— Liz Wheeler (@Liz_Wheeler) March 8, 2022

Wait, wait, wait. The founder of CPAC is down with the anti woman ideology of transgenderism?! I want off that particular conservative train. https://t.co/soBtAopbjM

— Rod Dreher (@roddreher) March 8, 2022

Schlapp also went back and forth in a tweetfest with former Trump campaign lawyer Jenna Ellis.

She tweeted:

No. None of this is remotely conservative, principled, or truthful, Matt. What are you doing?!

It’s sad to see CPAC leadership and the GOP establishment cave to the LGBT agenda.

I will not support this. https://t.co/E0xUPGzT0r

— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) March 8, 2022

Schlapp retweeted and responded, 

“Jenna all I am saying is in the end trans people deserve our love and compassion. We should defend girls sports against competing w men aggressively but in the end remember that all people deserve respect. Kinda simple. If showing decency makes you boycott @CPAC I’m good w it.”

Ellis replied:

That’s not all you said, Matt. You can’t walk back calling a man “her” under the guise of “love and compassion.” Love and compassion requires speaking truth.

Conservatives, this is an open call from Matt to abandon CPAC because he is unwilling to stand for truth.

Do it.

— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) March 8, 2022

But rather than having an honest argument with Ellis, Schlapp went back at her with an ad hominem attack:

Jenna this is a false controversy. You are upset w @CPAC bc we didn’t invite you to speak. We score the bills aimed at protecting girls sports and our kids from gender confusion indoctrination. I don’t wish to normalize it but simply just deal w it w compassion. https://t.co/ODcAaSoQJp

— Matt Schlapp (@mschlapp) March 8, 2022

Schlapp has lost my respect and I hope Mercedes talks with him about what he said about Thomas and what he said to Jenna Ellis. She, Ellis, did not deserve that kind of remark, and he, Thomas, did not deserve compassion for what he is doing in the world of swimming competition.

* * *

For more hard-hitting content, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against global warming, the heebie-jeebies and COVID-19.

* * *

Sclapp needs to resign his position with CPAC and Thomas needs to swim with the men, no matter what bathing attire he chooses to wear.

Tweet

Lia Thomas' teammate reveal he doesn't always cover up his bat and balls in the locker room

Lia Thomas, formerly known as Will, is accused by a teammate of failing to cover up his penis and testicles when he's in the locker room of the UPenn Women's Swim Team, in which he is the dominating swimmer, for some reason. He is also able to beat all of the women on the team in arm wrestling.

The actual women on the team are uncomfortable having to change their clothing and shower in the locker room with this guy and his boys hanging out all over the place, according to a recent report.

According to the Daily Mail, one of the actual female swimmers is speaking out about the issues she and her teammates face after the school allowed a man who claims to be a woman to join the squad this year.

Thomas — who competed on the men’s team as Will Thomas for three years before realizing how mediocre he is competing against fellow fellas, took a hiatus. Then it dawned on him, "Hey, if I say I'm a woman the school will have to allow me to compete on the women's team or suffer the consequences.  I'll call myself 'Lia,' yeah, that's the ticket."

So Will joined the women’s team as Lia, his balls and best friend intact, and became the fastest fake woman on the team. But when he showers, his true gender is out there for the women to see. According to the Daily Mail, while he sometimes covers his bat and balls in the locker room, there has been “a decent amount of nudity,” on his part. 

The unidentified female swimmer told the outlet that the exposure has made the women on the team increasingly uncomfortable. She obviously has to remain anonymous because of the blowback she would receive is she identified herself.

The anonymous swimmer also said that Thomas admitted to his teammates that he is still attracted to women and that never changed even with his so-called "transition," a term that unscientifically implies that a person can change their gender. And the fact that this garbage human being is heterosexual adds to his creepy and unethical personality.

“It’s definitely awkward because Lia still has male body parts and is still attracted to women,” the swimmer said.

This goes beyond the basic unfairness of a man competing against women in a sport. These women are being forced to disrobe and shower with a man who says he is attracted to women just to satisfy the school’s desire to bow to the radical transgender agenda.

But let's not let the women off the hook. 

They could refuse to swim with Thomas in competition. It's easy for anyone to say, but if they're going to lose to this creep, they might as well make a public statement about it by simply refusing to swim. Sure they might get cut from the team, but the public outcry and support might change things for the better.

So much for the make believe 'women's movement.' They have lost all credibility with this issue as well as the treatment of women in Islamic countries, and the female genital mutilation Muslim women face even in Western countries.

The actual women have often asked the school to provide a separate facility for Thomas to wash himself but the school has thumbed their nose at the normal thought and ignored them. The source told the outlet that they  “were basically told that we could not ostracize Lia by not having her in the locker room and that there’s nothing we can do about it, that we basically have to roll over and accept it, or we cannot use our own locker room.”

The unnamed woman said Thomas “doesn’t seem to care how it makes anyone else feel.” This might be due to Thomas being an immoral, self-centered, unethical, narcissistic POS. 

She said the school has told the female swimmers to just stay quiet and take it. “The 35 of us are just supposed to accept being uncomfortable in our own space and locker room for, like, the feelings of one,” she said.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

“The school was so focused on making sure Lia was okay, and doing everything they possibly could do for her, that they didn’t even think about the rest of us,” the woman said, referring to Thomas as a 'her' rather than what 'he' is.

She also said that it “seems like Thomas enjoys” all the attention and controversy he has brought to the Penn swim team.

That's what narcissists do.

Tweet

UPenn swimmer claims Lia Thomas colluded with another transgender swimmer to blow the race

This is a man and he has the balls to prove it

In an exclusive interview with OutKick, a woman on the Penn swimming team said she believes her teammate, a guy who calls himself a woman and changed his name to Lia Thomas, colluded with a Yale woman who calls herself a man, [almost] and swims on the women's team. Her name is Iszac Henig and she plans to have her genitals mutilated to look like a penis. The pair competed in a 100 freestyle race on January 8th and Henig beat Thomas.

The UPenn woman swimmer who calls herself a woman was granted anonymity because of threats from the university and activists who support mental illness. She believes Thomas, who has been comparing himself to Jackie Robinson [because otherwise he would be just a prick who competes against women] thinks he and Henig came up with a plan before the Penn home tri-meet with Yale and Dartmouth.

"Looking at [Lia’s] time, I don’t think she was trying," the Penn swimmer alleges while going along with the pronoun nonsense. "I know they’re friends and I know they were talking before the meet. I think she let her win to prove the point that, ‘Oh see, a female-to-male beat me.'"

When OutKick pressed her on if she flat-out thought it was collusion, and she really seemed convinced.

"I do. I can’t say for sure, but I wouldn’t be shocked if I found out that was 100% true," Mr. Thomas’ teammate said.

In the 100 freestyle race, Miss Henig finished with a time of 49.57; Mr. Thomas touched the wall in 52.84. During a November tri-meet with Princeton and Cornell, Thomas swam the 100 freestyle in 49.42.

The anonymous Penn swimmer also accuses Thomas of mailing it in during the January 8th 200 freestyle race that the transgender swimmer (1:48:73) won by two seconds.

"I was on deck and said to a friend, ‘She’s literally not trying.’ You could just tell," OutKick’s source said. "It was blatantly obvious. I was watching the 200 free and she was literally keeping pace with the other girls.

"She was No. 1 in the country at one point. These are definitely talented swimmers, but they’re not the caliber of being at the top in the country or anything like that."

The UPenn  actual female swimmer acknowledged that the team wasn’t 100% after traveling to Florida after the holidays for training, but noted that the training shouldn’t have made such a difference in Thomas’ performance to the degree that it did.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

"You can tell when someone is dying and they’re swimming slow," the swimmer added. "You can also tell when someone is not trying and I could see [in the 200 freestyle] that Lia was not trying."

Thomas, who has already qualified for the women’s NCAA championships in the 200 & 500 freestyle, was also accused by those who saw him race, of "coasting" and "barely trying" in the 500 freestyle race that Thomas won by one second.

Penn’s swim season continues Saturday with a dual meet on the road at Harvard. It's a good bet the guy will beat the women if there's no collusion.

Tweet