"Doctor" Gay's continued clusterfrack from her Congressional testimony

Claudine Gay: anti-Semite and alleged plagiarist

Ever since the "Three Stooges of Ivy" testified before Congress, people are taking sides. The anti-Semites, media and useful idiots on one side, and decent, fair-minded people on the other.

Since their testimony Liz Magill, former President of the University of Pennsylvania had to resign, and now two stooges remain: Claudine Gay of Harvard University and Sally Kornbluth of MIT. For now, Gay seems to be the next school president in the public crosshairs.

The law firm Edelson PC has ended recruiting at Harvard Law School due to Gay's disgusting testimony whereby she argued that context was required to determine whether calls for Jewish genocide violated the school's bullying and harassment policies. We know that misgendering a person or using the wrong pronouns does, but hey, this is about those, you know, Joooze.

NEW: Edelson PC, a major law firm, will no longer participate in on-campus interviews at Harvard Law School due to Claudine Gay’s Congressional testimony.

“Dr. Gay was in a position to help lead the country. She did the very opposite,” writes founder and CEO Jay Edelson: pic.twitter.com/aTWhX62BKL— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) December 16, 2023

Anyway, the firm’s CEO Jay Edelson announced the change in a Dec. 14 letter to the Law School’s director of recruitment and operations, Jesse Ohrenberger.

“We, along with the rest of the nation, observed Dr. Claudine Gay’s testimony before Congress, wherein she refused to unequivocally state that advocating for genocide would breach the school’s code of conduct,” Edelson wrote. “In light of these events, we have made the difficult decision to discontinue our participation in on-campus interviews.”

Edelson’s decision came "despite [Gay's] belated [bull-crap] apology."

"[T]he gravity of her initial response cannot be overlooked. As an expert in political and social studies, Dr. Gay certainly knew to expect the types of questions that would be asked of her," Edelson's letter stated.

The issue regarding Gay's alleged dissertation plagiarism was not addressed by Edelson nor was the fact that she appears to be an affirmative action hire.

He noted that the firm’s move will not punish students. Rather than recruiting on campus, they committed to "exploring alternative channels to connect with those students interested in opportunities at Edelson PC, ensuring that our actions are directed appropriately at the administration and do not penalize students for matters beyond their control."

When asked about the allegations regarding plagiarism, Gay said, "I have not yet begun to fight. I shall fight them on the beaches. I shall fight them on the landing grounds. I shall fight them in the fields and in the streets. I will fight them in the cities. I will never surrender!" she said.

Tweet

Over 200 real Native Americans sign letter demanding Fauxcahontas clarify her Cherokee heritage

Over 200 actual Cherokee Nation Native Americans and other tribes have written a strongly worded letter to Sen. Elizabeth Warren of the fictional Hiyaliyar Tribe (D-MA) demanding she either explain her claims about having Cherokee ancestry, or admit she speaks with forked tongue and retract her claim.

People have made "dubious" claims to having Native American ancestry for years, and according to the Los Angeles Times, "more than $800 million in government contracts reserved for minorities instead went to companies set up by members of groups with dubious claims to being Cherokee and Creek Indian tribes."

Many of the claims stem from fake or inaccurate family lore that includes "evidence" of Native American ancestry and, like Warren, results from commercially available DNA tests. In the Fauxcahontas case, her 1/1024th positive results could have come from anywhere in North or South America.

But the real proof of her Native American heritage is her MeeMaw's Pow Wow Chow recipe of crab casserole and her own high cheekbones.

But I digress. The group's letter states:

“Your history of false claims to American Indian identity and the defense of these claims with a highly publicized DNA test continue to dog your political career. For Native Americans, this moment is more than an annoyance; it represents the most public debate about our identity in a generation. In a country where Indigenous people are mostly invisible, what Americans conclude from this debate will impact Native rights for years to come.”

So yeah, Elizabeth Warren really kind of sucks and she lies like someone's Bonny over the ocean.

The letter accuses Warren of normalizing the process of “stealing” Native American ancestry to gain some form of notoriety or access to benefits reserved for Native Americans — reserved as a form of restitution for the history of mistreatment at the hands of the United States government. It's not much different than the crime of stolen valor of those of us who have served in the military.

“When you still defend yourself by stating you believed what you heard growing up, you set a harmful example for these white people stealing Native identity and resources with stories very similar to your own,” the group letter states.

Warren claims she didn't benefit from claiming Native American ancestry, but she lies so often it's virtually impossible to know the truth.

Harvard Law School listed Fauxcahontas as a member of a minority group in official publications, and Warren listed “Native American” as her ethnicity on her application for the Bar.  In effect, she stole the heritage of Native Americans.

Warren often has spoken about her family’s history with the Cherokee nation — often using racist stereotypes, like “high cheekbones,” associated with Cherokee ancestry — as evidence of her family’s Native American DNA. One would not be surprised if she claimed she only eats the meat that she kills after eating the heart of the animal and thanking the food god.

Her claims — and a subsequent DNA test in response to President Trump's trolling her into it, revealed Warren to be about as Native American as Ilhan Omar.

Warren responded to the letter late Tuesday, apologizing for her past claims of Native American ancestry.

“I was wrong to have identified as a Native American, and, without qualification or excuse, I apologize,” Warren said, though she did not, as requested, explicitly retract her claims because she knows she will never get elected President and her minority status just might score her another high paying gig.

She also distanced herself from contract abuse, lying that her “situation differs from these cases because I never benefited [from Native American ancestry] financially or professionally” [except at Harvard Law School by beating out the competition].

Leaders of the group that issued the letter noticed that Warren’s apology did not include a retraction. They told the LA Times that it’s clear Warren has “made an effort” to address the injustice but that they “hope that after further dialogue with the campaign, Warren will bravely and publicly tell the truth about her family.”

Hopefully, none of the tribe elders will hold their breath waiting for her to tell the truth, other than telling her truth.

Elizabeth Warren is actually more annoying than Hillary Clinton, a feat that is almost impossible to believe.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Newsweek does an "Onion" spoof

Newsweek magazine may be sued by The Onion for an article they published by an alleged Harvard Law School professor who goes by the name Lawrence Lessig, an actual Harvard Law School professor. 

The Onion-like spoof suggests a scenario whereby Hillary Clinton could still become president.

Harvard professor, Newsweek mocked for claims Clinton can still become president, even though she was never voted into that office after being embarrassed by losing to Donald J. Trump.

The real Lawrence Lessig is a Roy L. Furman professor of law and leadership at Harvard Law School. This person [it could be a man or woman, we don't really know] outlined a fantasy in which Clinton could steal the reins of power in the event of a series of impeachments of the Trump administration.

The Onion, normally a smiley-faced satirical newspaper, was livid by the spoof.

Anyway, here's what the so-called "professor" said:

If Trump resigns or gets impeached, Vice President Mike Pence resigns or gets impeached and then House Speaker Paul Ryan, who would become the next in line as POTUS, could then appoint Hillary Clinton as his deputy and then resigns, she would become the FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERRRICAAAAAA!

"This is one way that it could happen," the person calling him- or herself Lessig told Newsweek, who then printed the story. The so-called professor first envisioned this scenario in a blog post in October.

"If Ryan became President because the Trump/Pence campaign committed treason, who should he nominate as his Vice President?" he blogged. "The answer seems unavoidable: He should nominate the person defeated by the treason of his own party, and then step aside, and let her become the President."

Hahahahahahahaha.

No wonder The Onion is angry at Newsweek. They tried to pull this crap off as real. 

Nobody who is serious about political philosophy would ever believe this load of garbage, except perhaps someone who still cannot get over the loss of Hillary Clinton, the worst possible candidate who ever cackled and farted quarters, to a reality TV guy, known to have cheated on all three of his wives and said he could shoot a person on the streets of Manhattan and get away with it.

A few people on social media thought that Newsweek was being serious about this article and attacked the canary cage liner mag pointing out that the U.S. Constitution and existing laws clearly define the line of succession and Clinton's position isn't mentioned even  once.

But Newsweek had to be kidding. Nobody would take that assertion seriously, would they?

Wall Street Journal writer Byron Tau said, "What's left of Newsweek is actively making people dumber and less informed and honestly should be unfollowed and shunned for this kind of behavior."

I guess Tau just didn't get the joke. The writer of the article couldn't possibly be a real law professor.



Tweet