Say what you want about Barack Hussein Obama, but you have to admit, he can say nothing better than anyone else. He didn't hear about the AP scandal until he heard it on the news. No clue had he about the IRS scandal. Benghazi? Well, that was really unfortunate, wasn't it?
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Monday, May 13, 2013
Gosnell Guilty on 3 Counts, Planned Parenthood on 3 Million Counts
After ten days of deliberation, Kermit Gosnell was found guilty of murder on 3 counts of murdering babies, and involuntary manslaughter of murdering a woman seeking an abortion. Most of the mainstream media did not cover the story, but Fox News and the conservative blogs did. After the verdict, Planned Parenthood spoke out against Gosnell, tap dancing around the issue of the dead babies involved, but advocating for the rights of women to have safe abortions (at a Planned Parenthood clinic near you). One can only wonder what PP would have said had Gosnell been acquitted. And Gosnell's clinic may not be the exception, but the rule. There appears to be a late term abortion industry in this country and they are under the radar, and liberals want to keep them there, in spite of what Planned Parenthood pretends to be saying. There are more regulations at your local beauty parlor than at abortion clinics.
One of the apparent criteria as to whether an abortion can be deemed legal is the issue of viability. That is, if the fetus were taken out of the womb, would there be a reasonable chance that it could live. I stand with Hillary Clinton on that by saying, "What difference does it make?" If a fetus is not a human being, then what is it? Liberals like to use the power of words to make their points, such as "a woman's right to choose," "women's health issues," and so on.
In well over 90 percent of the time, abortions have nothing to do with health issues for the mother. They also are only very rarely about ending the result of a rape--and even when it does involve rape, is it moral to kill a baby for the sins of the father? (I am not using the word 'sins' in a religious sense, but to make a point.)
![]() |
| This is not politics--this is reality |
Now the sentencing phase should come and Kermit Gosnell faces the possibility of the death sentence. Will he actually be executed? Probably not. He's 72 years old and will likely die in jail and some liberal will likely develop a crush on him, like the teenager who developed a crush on the Boston Marathon bomber number two.
For every piece of human excrement who goes about killing the innocent, there is a human fly attracted to this subhuman garbage.
Tweet
Who's On First? Not Obama
Hillary didn't know what was going on in Benghazi, even though her emails seem to indicate she was informed. Susan Rice was simply told what to say by someone who the public is not privy to knowing. Eric Holder had no idea about who walked the guns to the Mexican drug cartels in the Fast and Furious caper. Barack is clueless about why help was never sent to save the Benghazi outpost or whatever the proper term is for the non-consulate, non-embassy, and he has no idea about Fast and Furious or the current IRS scandal where conservative organizations, donors, and individuals who may be involved with the Tea Party. In other words, nobody is running the country. Nobody but the people at the bottom of the political food chain are guilty of misdeeds.
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Hillary is Not Judgment-Proof
It has become very clear that at least some of the deaths at Benghazi could have been prevented and that the Obama administration was directly involved in covering up the facts that pointed to their incompetence. Specifically, Hillary Clinton the Former
Secretary of State, did nothing to come to the aid of the consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed by Islamic terrorists belonging to Ansar al-Sharia, an arm of al Qaeda.
Victoria Nuland, the Department of State spokesperson, was instrumental in removing all references to Ansar al-Sharia, al Qaeda, and basically all aspects of the truth regarding what really happened last September 11th.
The Boston Marathon jihadist bombing on April 15th, in Jay Carney's way of thinking may have been "fairly long ago," and the administration would like to see that buried along with Benghazi, but it hasn't gone away. Terrorist One, the older brother of the pair, was killed and no cemetery in Massachusetts wanted to allow his body to be buried on their grounds. But it was learned that an Islamic cemetery in Virginia has opened its arms to the dead carcass and provided him with an Islamic funeral, complete with the al-Fahtihah, a prayer prescribed to be said 17 times a day that denounces the Jews and Christian infidels. The people in that Virginia community were not told of the burial and only today was it mentioned on Fox News after the story appeared yesterday on Pamela Geller's: AtlasShrugs.com.
Now we've learned of another misstep in this administration, but this time it's with the IRS. Seems like our least liked arm of government has been going after not-for-profit organizations with names like "Tea Party," or "Patriot." They've been asking questions about managment's connections things of a more personal nature. It seems that the companies singled out by the IRS, even though they initially denied doing that in the first place, are those that have supported conservatives. Many liberals are just as upset as conservatives as this constitutes an abuse of power by an organization that is supposed to be nonpartisan, but some liberals are yelling "foul," and say the right is being political. Funny, but they never said anything foul about the left when
they went after Nixon for exactly the same thing.
But back to Benghazi. Former Vice President, Dick Chaney told lawmakers on Thursday, "I think Hillary (Clinton) should be subpoenaed if necessary."The good news is that Republicans will continue to press for answers because contrary to what Hillary said, it actually does matter how our four Americans were killed. It not only matters to the family, the mothers who are having a sad Mothers Day today, but it matters to us and our understanding of how something as terrible as this happened and what can we do to prevent a recurrence.
Hillary lied at least 3 times. First when she told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that "we didn't have a clear picture" about the actual facts on the attack, when in fact, Gregory Hicks, the second in command at the U.S. Mission in Libya, testified on Wednesday that he informed Clinton the night of September 11th and 12th of exactly what took place at the compound.
Next, she lied to the Senate when she said that she herself saw what Chairman Mullen and Ambassador Pickering referred to as timely and exceptional coordination--there was no hesitation, no delays in decision-making, and no orders to stand down from Washington or the military." But the Benghazi hearing revealed that help was denied twice--by the State Department's Foreign Emergency Support Team and when Lt. Col. Gibson was ordered to stand down.
Third, when Clinton told the Senate that she did not see any diplomatic cables from Libya asking for more security. "I didn't see those requests," she said. "They didn't come to me. I didn't approve them. I didn't deny them." However, Gen. Dempsey had told the Senate in February that it seemed improbable that she did not see the cables, saying, "I would call myself surprised that she didn't."
One thing that seems quite clear to me is the need for Mrs. Clinton to be subpoenaed for this hearing. I would also like to see Leon Panetta testify too and prove what he said when he arrogantly told us that when the danger is unclear we do not deploy help when American lives are at risk. That's precisely what we do. We do not wait until the danger subsides--we act, we fight, we extract our people--even when they're dead. That's what the military does, and Panetta should know that as Secretary of Defense. Maybe they should have simply made him Secretary of the Secretary of Defense and put a military person in that position; say someone like Alan West. He would have known what to do. But enough said about Panetta; let's get back to Hillary.
Clinton's role in the Benghazi debacle is unclear because she wasn't interviewed by the State Department's Accountability Review Board, and they made great efforts to blame those at the bottom while protecting those at the top. And the media would never hold her responsible for anything that might affect her run for office in 2016--in fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see them applauding when she enters the room.
What's obvious is that there are those on the left who would hold Hillary Clinton blameless under all circumstances--not because she actually is blameless, but because she, like Obama, is a rock star politician. I can only hope that the Benghazi whistleblowers will cast a shadow of real doubt on this administration, but somehow I think they're laughing at the country because they believe they'll get away with their incompetency.
Tweet
Secretary of State, did nothing to come to the aid of the consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed by Islamic terrorists belonging to Ansar al-Sharia, an arm of al Qaeda.
Victoria Nuland, the Department of State spokesperson, was instrumental in removing all references to Ansar al-Sharia, al Qaeda, and basically all aspects of the truth regarding what really happened last September 11th.
The Boston Marathon jihadist bombing on April 15th, in Jay Carney's way of thinking may have been "fairly long ago," and the administration would like to see that buried along with Benghazi, but it hasn't gone away. Terrorist One, the older brother of the pair, was killed and no cemetery in Massachusetts wanted to allow his body to be buried on their grounds. But it was learned that an Islamic cemetery in Virginia has opened its arms to the dead carcass and provided him with an Islamic funeral, complete with the al-Fahtihah, a prayer prescribed to be said 17 times a day that denounces the Jews and Christian infidels. The people in that Virginia community were not told of the burial and only today was it mentioned on Fox News after the story appeared yesterday on Pamela Geller's: AtlasShrugs.com.
Now we've learned of another misstep in this administration, but this time it's with the IRS. Seems like our least liked arm of government has been going after not-for-profit organizations with names like "Tea Party," or "Patriot." They've been asking questions about managment's connections things of a more personal nature. It seems that the companies singled out by the IRS, even though they initially denied doing that in the first place, are those that have supported conservatives. Many liberals are just as upset as conservatives as this constitutes an abuse of power by an organization that is supposed to be nonpartisan, but some liberals are yelling "foul," and say the right is being political. Funny, but they never said anything foul about the left when
they went after Nixon for exactly the same thing.
But back to Benghazi. Former Vice President, Dick Chaney told lawmakers on Thursday, "I think Hillary (Clinton) should be subpoenaed if necessary."The good news is that Republicans will continue to press for answers because contrary to what Hillary said, it actually does matter how our four Americans were killed. It not only matters to the family, the mothers who are having a sad Mothers Day today, but it matters to us and our understanding of how something as terrible as this happened and what can we do to prevent a recurrence.
Hillary lied at least 3 times. First when she told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that "we didn't have a clear picture" about the actual facts on the attack, when in fact, Gregory Hicks, the second in command at the U.S. Mission in Libya, testified on Wednesday that he informed Clinton the night of September 11th and 12th of exactly what took place at the compound.
Next, she lied to the Senate when she said that she herself saw what Chairman Mullen and Ambassador Pickering referred to as timely and exceptional coordination--there was no hesitation, no delays in decision-making, and no orders to stand down from Washington or the military." But the Benghazi hearing revealed that help was denied twice--by the State Department's Foreign Emergency Support Team and when Lt. Col. Gibson was ordered to stand down.
Third, when Clinton told the Senate that she did not see any diplomatic cables from Libya asking for more security. "I didn't see those requests," she said. "They didn't come to me. I didn't approve them. I didn't deny them." However, Gen. Dempsey had told the Senate in February that it seemed improbable that she did not see the cables, saying, "I would call myself surprised that she didn't."
One thing that seems quite clear to me is the need for Mrs. Clinton to be subpoenaed for this hearing. I would also like to see Leon Panetta testify too and prove what he said when he arrogantly told us that when the danger is unclear we do not deploy help when American lives are at risk. That's precisely what we do. We do not wait until the danger subsides--we act, we fight, we extract our people--even when they're dead. That's what the military does, and Panetta should know that as Secretary of Defense. Maybe they should have simply made him Secretary of the Secretary of Defense and put a military person in that position; say someone like Alan West. He would have known what to do. But enough said about Panetta; let's get back to Hillary.
Clinton's role in the Benghazi debacle is unclear because she wasn't interviewed by the State Department's Accountability Review Board, and they made great efforts to blame those at the bottom while protecting those at the top. And the media would never hold her responsible for anything that might affect her run for office in 2016--in fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see them applauding when she enters the room.
What's obvious is that there are those on the left who would hold Hillary Clinton blameless under all circumstances--not because she actually is blameless, but because she, like Obama, is a rock star politician. I can only hope that the Benghazi whistleblowers will cast a shadow of real doubt on this administration, but somehow I think they're laughing at the country because they believe they'll get away with their incompetency.
Tweet
Friday, May 10, 2013
The Stench of Benghazi Lingers
![]() |
| Something smells real bad |

You can see from the timeline just how the changes took place seen here and judge for yourself. Remember, Carney insisted that they relied solely on CIA talking points that the intelligence community wrote and revised.
On "Good Morning America," Jonathan Karl said that many of the changes of the emails came from Victoria Nuland, the State Department spokesperson. She said that the information of the CIA warnings could be used by members of Congress to "beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that . . . ?"

It seems that the motivation for all the editing in the emails was to ensure that each incompetent department within the Obama administration was not seen as incompetent. I mean, why go there? It might make Hillary look incompetent too when she got that call at 2:00 AM.
I would simply like to know where Obama was, what did he do when he found out about it, and why is he not impeached.
Tweet
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
Terrorist One: Cover Him Over 'fore he Stinks, Boys
We have a dead terrorist laid out on a slab in a funeral home. No cemetery in the Greater Boston area wants to allow him to be buried on their property, so the rotting dead guy has no place to go. His name was Tamerlan Tsarnaev, better known as terrorist number one--I didn't want to use his name because he doesn't deserve the notoriety, but for clarity sake, I felt it is necessary.
His family has not claimed him, but his terrorist-loving jihadist mother would like his carcass to be returned to Russia at taxpayer's expense. She will not be coming here to retrieve her son because she would likely be arrested for the crime of shoplifting. Terrorist number one's father is mute on the subject, except to say he's too ill to make the trip here, and number one's uncle would like him to be buried in the Boston area. Fat chance.
I may have a solution to the problem. Tell me what you think of the idea if you would. How about we give him the same honor we gave to Osama bin Laden? We can swaddle the body in clean white linens, transport him via Navy vessel to the mid-Atlantic, have an imam say a Muslim prayer; perhaps he can say the al-Fahtihah:
![]() |
| Not to be mistaken for Miss America |
His family has not claimed him, but his terrorist-loving jihadist mother would like his carcass to be returned to Russia at taxpayer's expense. She will not be coming here to retrieve her son because she would likely be arrested for the crime of shoplifting. Terrorist number one's father is mute on the subject, except to say he's too ill to make the trip here, and number one's uncle would like him to be buried in the Boston area. Fat chance.
I may have a solution to the problem. Tell me what you think of the idea if you would. How about we give him the same honor we gave to Osama bin Laden? We can swaddle the body in clean white linens, transport him via Navy vessel to the mid-Atlantic, have an imam say a Muslim prayer; perhaps he can say the al-Fahtihah:
In the name of God, the Entirely Merciful, the Especially Merciful.
All praise and thanks is for to God, [The] Creator, Owner, Sustainer of the Worlds.
The Entirely Merciful, The Especially Merciful.
Owner of the Day of Recompense.
You alone do we worship and You alone we seek for help.
Guide us to the Straight Path.
The path of those whom Your blessings are upon, not of those who You have cursed nor of those who have gone astray.
![]() |
| A Jihadist in "Heaven" |
I always marvel at how all powerful and mighty Allah is supposed to be, but he created so many mistakes by creating Jews and Christians, so say the Muslims, and then he needed the help of Muslims to kill them. Guess he isn't as powerful as they say.
My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.
In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist,
Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed
if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners. Of
course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed,
the clock is ticking.Tweet
Saturday, May 4, 2013
Saturday Night Flushings
![]() |
| Bad Day for a Killer Terrorist |
It turns out that Tamerlan died of blunt force bullet holes and head and torso injuries caused by a fleeing brother in a stolen car that dragged the dirtbag about 50 yards..
![]() |
| "They're dead. What difference does it make?" |
And speaking of Benghazi, it's back in the news (sorry Hillary and Obama, truth happens). I don't know what the outcome is going to be, nobody does, but you can bet Hillary is somehow going to walk away from it and still run for president in three years. It's destiny--she's karmatically slated to be the first woman POTUS and hopes Benghazi will just go away again. There is a group of twitter conservatives who refuse to allow this to happen so perhaps I will be wrong and she wll get her just dessert--humble pie with a side of crow. But, as Jay Carney said to the press, Benghazi was long ago. Yes, seven months is long ago in terms of liberal accountability. We must try to forget the past and allow Benghazi to go away. I'm still waiting for Obama to get back to Ed Henry. I'd love to see Obama's day schedule for September 11th last year--he was quite visible for Osama's take-down but invisible for the terrorist attack that killed 4 Americans. Hmm . . . do you suppose he really was fast asleep dreaming about shooting 3-pointers?
As I write this, the Boston Bruins are playing the Toronto Maple Leafs. I'm a New Yorker currently living in Canada. I don't like Toronto--I'm a Sens fan, but I'm a New Yorker and I am smiling at the final score: Bruins 2 Leafs 4. Anyone but the Bruins or Red Sox. :)
My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.
In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist,
Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed
if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners. Of
course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed,
the clock is ticking.
Tweet
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
3 More Suspects Suspected of Being Involved with the Boston Bombing
Three more suspects have been taken into custody related to the Boston Marathon bombing. Two are foreign "students", and one is an American citizen. It's totally possible that these three are just Bidenesque, which means they are dumber than a bag of damaged rocks and were simply tried to ditch the evidence left behind by their buddy, terrorist #2. So, it is possible that they might not have been involved with the actual bombing, but still, they aided their terrorist buddy rather than turn him in to keep him from killing more innocent people.
I believe they knew about terrorist #2's plan because they knew just what to get rid of--the computer, fireworks, and Vaseline. At best, even if they didn't know, they put their friendship with this Islamic terrorist ahead of the lives of those he killed and maimed, and had he gotten away with the bombing, the lives of future victims he might have killed. These "students" need to be put away for a long time, but not as criminals--as enemy combatants. We are at war, my friends.
Some are calling these terrorists "self radicalized terrorists," but only by people who have never read the koran. The koran is the Islamic scripture that clearly talks about killing the infidels "wherever you find them." It is Islam itself that is radical, not people who somehow misinterpret it. We continue to pretend that Islam is a religion of peace out of fear that we will offend Muslims and they will strike out at us. Well, how's that working out for ya? They strike out at us when we draw a cartoon of their violent, anti-Semitic prophet, peas be up in him, and they strike out at us when we don't.
I suggest we never call these terrorists by name and when we label them as such, we need to be clear and call them Islamic terrorists. To liberals, this will be considered "racist" even though Islam is not a race but a radical geopolitical movement cloaked in religion. And by using the term "Islamic," we are defining the problem and thus the enemy. If you don't believe that Islam itself is the problem, just quote parts of the Medina koran (Sura 9:25 for example) and watch the reaction from Muslims.
Tweet
![]() |
| Terrorists #s 1 & 2 |
I believe they knew about terrorist #2's plan because they knew just what to get rid of--the computer, fireworks, and Vaseline. At best, even if they didn't know, they put their friendship with this Islamic terrorist ahead of the lives of those he killed and maimed, and had he gotten away with the bombing, the lives of future victims he might have killed. These "students" need to be put away for a long time, but not as criminals--as enemy combatants. We are at war, my friends.
Some are calling these terrorists "self radicalized terrorists," but only by people who have never read the koran. The koran is the Islamic scripture that clearly talks about killing the infidels "wherever you find them." It is Islam itself that is radical, not people who somehow misinterpret it. We continue to pretend that Islam is a religion of peace out of fear that we will offend Muslims and they will strike out at us. Well, how's that working out for ya? They strike out at us when we draw a cartoon of their violent, anti-Semitic prophet, peas be up in him, and they strike out at us when we don't.
I suggest we never call these terrorists by name and when we label them as such, we need to be clear and call them Islamic terrorists. To liberals, this will be considered "racist" even though Islam is not a race but a radical geopolitical movement cloaked in religion. And by using the term "Islamic," we are defining the problem and thus the enemy. If you don't believe that Islam itself is the problem, just quote parts of the Medina koran (Sura 9:25 for example) and watch the reaction from Muslims.
My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.
In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist,
Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed
if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners. Of
course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed,
the clock is ticking.
Tweet
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Conservatives Finally Find Yet Another Reason to Cancel Netflix
Netflix Discovers That Mocking a Murdered Conservative on the Anniversary of His Assassination Is Apparently Not Great for Customer Retentio...












