Native activist outs Hollywood producer for falsely producing fake Cherokee background

"Can I get a cowabunga?"

Hollywood producer Heather Rae, 56, lied about her Native American background. She is even less a Native American than Sen. Elizabeth "Running Cons" Warren (D-MA). The latter clocks in DNA-ishly at a 1 in 1024 shot at victimhood, while Rae is only 1 in 2048 for a chance at the victimhood prize.

Native American watchdog group the Tribal Alliance Against Frauds (TAAF) demanded Rae's apology for speaking with forked tongue not in cheek.

Rae, who serves on the Academy of Motion Pictures' Indigenous Alliance claims that she is the daughter of an "Indian" mother and a "cowboy" father, and some so called news outlets reported her having a "Cherokee" parent. But recently, the  New York Post reported about recent claims by Native American activists insist that Rae is, at best, only 1/2048th Cherokee, about the same amount as does Kim Jong Un.

According to the TAAF’s research, Rae has no ancestors recognized by the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, the Eastern Band of Cherokee and the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians. In addition, a divorce certificate from 1969 listed both of Rae’s parents as White and, according to Democrat's standards, racists.

"Being an American Indian person is not just about who you claim to be, it is about who claims you," Tribal Alliance Against Frauds director Lianna Costantino told the New York Post. "And it’s much more than just race. We are citizens of sovereign nations. Being an Indian is a legal, political distinction."

The closest connection TAAF could recognize as a possible Cherokee connection was Rae’s fourth great-grandparent. 

Prior to this allegation, Rae led the Sundance Institute’s Native American program. She also worked as "narrative change strategist" for the "unapologetically ambitious and innovative Native women-led" organization IllumiNative--a takeoff of Illuminati--which sought to amplify "contemporary Native voices."

Her most recent film "Fancy Dance"--a takeoff of Fancy Pants--was also partly funded by the Cherokee Nation and premiered at January’s Sundance Film Festival.

Following this claim, a source connected with IllumiNative allegedly told the Post, "It is important to note that blood quantum minimums and citizenship requirements within the Native community continues to be a sensitive and nuanced issue that has a dark and complicated history. Those within the Native community deserve the space and the agency to have these conversations."

Prior to this accusation, the Native American community was rocked by another scandal in Oct. 2022. Activist Sacheen Littlefeather, who gained notoriety after rejecting Marlon Brando's Best Actor award for "The Godfather" in his stead at the 1973 Academy Awards, was revealed to, in fact, have no Native American heritage. She was simply another victim seeker like Liz Warren, who used her fake claim as a gateway to a Harvard job that might have gone to an actual Native American.

After her death earlier that month, Littlefeather’s sisters Trudy Orlandi and Rosalind Cruz revealed that the activist, born Marie Louise Cruz, was not in the least bit Native American. According to Orlandi and Cruz, Littlefeather had changed her name after believing to find Native American heritage and became more active in protests.

"It's a lie. … My father was who he was. His family came from Mexico, and my dad was born in Oxnard," Orlandi said.

There's a long line of wannabe victims who hope to access the benefits of victimhood. It all kind of stinks when you realize that wanting to be in the victim class is a subtle message to those in that class that they are less than you. That's the soft bigotry of low expectations, aka racism.

Tweet

AOC has no idea what dangers TikTok poses to US

Largemouth Lass

If Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Comatose (Socialist-NY) had any idea of the threats that the Chinese Communist Party's company TikTok poses on the American people, she probably wouldn't be shilling for them, but maybe she would, come to think of it.

The House of Representatives recently held a series of congressional hearings regarding TikTik and the company's control by communist China. Even the engineers in China had to admit that the company does indeed have access to personal information of many millions of Americans, and thus, so does the Chinese government, which would use that information for their goals, and those conflict with ours.

When asked about the horrendous security issue, TikTok's CEO claimed that criticism of his company and the Chinese government is xenophobia and even when pressed, he refused to comment on the Uyghur genocide.

Another group supporting the invented right that China has the right to have our information is the Democrat Party, at least some of their members. Rep. Comatose, for example, put out her "first" TikTok and heaped praise on the communist company's spy operation.

ICYMI: @AOC has joined tiktok to talk about tiktok — & she’s spot on📲🫡👏pic.twitter.com/QwqsXNWq94

— Annie Wu (all socials: @annie_wu_22) (@Annie_Wu_22) March 25, 2023

While Wu obviously supports AOC, it isn't known if she has slept with Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) as of now.

Granted, some Democrats actually see the problems that allowing TikTok to operate under the cloak of communist China can cause. Having our information is like having influence over us as the company learns more about us, item by item.

But is AOC merely defending and lauding them out of ignorance, of which she has more than her fair share, or is it because TikTok's parent company, Bytedance, gave the Hispanic Congressional Caucus Foundation $150,000 this past December, and AOC sits on the advisory board? Hmm.

Another Democrat Rep. Jamal Bowman (D-NY) also supports the communists and has decided to be vocal about it. Can it be that he supports China spying on us because Bytedance has supported the Congressional Black Caucus, which Bowman also sits on its board. And there are additional Democrats who sit on the boards of these two foundations who have been greased by Bytedance.

Money talks, patriotism walks. Is that the way it's going to be? 

Leftists like Comatose and Bowman don't mind selling Americans' personal information to China as long as the wheels of their foundations are greased with donations. They could care less about the average person, even while AOC pretends to care about the little guy while she profits and goes to Met Galas and create a corruption scandal in her "Tax the Rich" dress.

"Let them eat crickets."

Investigate everyone who supports TikTok spying on us.

Tweet

Trump rally hushed when he mocks DeSantis

Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican --Ronald Reagan

Waco, Texas -- Former President Trump had a huge crowd at the Waco, Texas rally on Saturday. They loved seeing him up on the podium again and believe he'll win the nomination and then win back the presidency. They cheered loudly and enthusiastically.

But then he took aim at Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis and his words were met with little response from the throng in attendance.

DeSantis has yet to declare his candidacy in the 2024 race, but it's widely believed that he will, in fact, go for it.

Trump argued that DeSantis owed his governorship to his endorsement and would have lost without it. Then he began an impersonation of DeSantis allegedly begging him for his support in the 2018 state's primary.

During his Saturday campaign event in Waco, Texas, on Saturday, Trump argued that DeSantis had little chance of becoming Florida's governor without the former president's endorsement, with Trump breaking into a pejorative impersonation of DeSantis allegedly begging him for his support in the state's 2018 Republican primary.

"So, he came, and he really wanted [my endorsement]. I said, ‘You can’t win, can you? How do you – can [you] win?'" Trump said, recalling the alleged conversation with DeSantis. "‘Sir, if you endorse me, I’ll win. Please, please, sir, endorse me,'" Trump continued as he acted out in a crying, pleading voice that didn't ring true about DeSantis.

It's noteworthy that in past Trump rallies, whenever he went after his opponents the crowd would loudly support him, but not so this time. Of course, some in the crowd laughed or clapped as Trump kept going after DeSantis, but there didn't appear to be the same enthusiasm to cheer the attack of the governor as there had been with others by Trump in the past.

DeSantis graduated from Yale in 2001, magna cum laude, and Harvard Law School in 2005 with a Juris Doctor cum laude. In 2004, while at Harvard, he was commissioned as an officer in the U.S. Navy and assigned to the Navy Judge Advocate General's Corp (JAG) and completed Naval Justice School in 2005.

Donald Trump graduated from the Wharton School with a BS in Economics in 1968. He has never disclosed his academic performance so if he received any honors, he is being humble about it.

As it stands, DeSantis, while not yet declared, stands to be Trump's biggest rival in the GOP field, after having won re-election in Florida by a landslide without the help of former President Trump.

DeSantis has not taken Trump's bait and has not gone toe-to-toe with him.

Tweet

Trump makes incredible claim about DA Bragg's case on him

GOP presidential candidate and former President Donald J. Trump is not one to temper hyperbole. He said on Saturday that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has dropped the case against him regarding alleged campaign violations.

"I think they've already dropped the case," Trump told reporters after appearing at a campaign rally in Waco, Texas. "It's a fake case. Some fake cases, they have absolutely nothing," he claimed.

And Trump may be correct. Alvin Bragg seems to have his eyes set on bigger things than even his belly--like running for New York State Governor and maybe even the presidency one day. So it's a no brainer that this entire case against Trump is political, especially since Bragg bragged about getting Trump when he vied for the DA job.

Trump's campaign spokesman Steven Cheung was asked by Fox News Digital about the Trump claim about the case being dropped and said: "This has been dropped because everyone knows this was a partisan witch-hunt by a radical, leftist DA that sought to politically weaponize the Justice system to influence an election."

Last week Bragg's office was expect to issue an indictment for alleged hush-money payments that Trump supposedly made as a presidential candidate in 2016 to porn actress Stormy Daniels [whose real name is Stephanie Clifford] in 2016. Trump, who dubbed Daniels with the sobriquet "Horse Face" denied the claim.

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee demand Bragg testify before Congress about the details of the probe, which was met with a harsh response on Saturday by Bragg who apparently does not want to be held accountable for his politically motivated actions.

The office seemed to say: "We evaluate cases in our jurisdiction as we see fit, based on facts that correspond with our truth, and evidence that supports our cause against whiteness." 

But they didn't come out and say it this way.

The office told Fox News Digital that Bragg "stands by" his previous pledge to publicly state the conclusion of the investigation, "whether we conclude our work without bringing charges, or move forward with an indictment."

Then it's on to the governorship in the near future.

Meanwhile, the case is still in limbo as we wait to see if it will go forward or prove Trump right . . . again.

Tweet

NYC teachers union hosting seminar on 'harmful effects of blackness in our lives'

Erica Sandoval: what a real race hustler looks like

Just kidding. 

The United Federation of Teachers would never get away with hosting a seminar titled "The Harmful Effects of Blackness In Our Lives," silly. It's actually called the "Harmful Effects of Whiteness In Our Lives." That kind of racism is acceptable and makes for great cocktail talk among the woke white folk who need to virtue signal and are actually signaling their soft bigotry of low expectations.

When you put the shoe on the other foot, you can easily see the racism, but it's like Chris Rock using the "n" word, as if that's acceptable for some reason.

The United Federation of Teachers’ online seminar, dubbed “Holding the Weight on Whiteness,” is scheduled for Monday, from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m., and will be hosted by Queens-based psychotherapy charlatan and self-proclaimed “Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Leader” Erica Sandoval who is hoping to make a financial killing with the title she gave herself.

UFT members who are licensed mental health professionals can earn two hours of credit toward their continuing education credentials, which can eventually result in a higher salary and a considerable reduction in IQ.

The workshop costs $25 to attend and will focus on “key cultural themes … related to the Latinx/e communities,” including “internalized racism, privilege, [and] white identity,” according to the union’s website and an Instagram post.

As Dilbert cartoonist and influencer Scott Adams suggested, White people should start using the term "Whitx" just to piss off the woke. He also called out the left for having only one note in their "racism symphony," because they have no viable ideas on how to run things.

“Participants will leave the workshop with a better understanding of how to center ourselves as a form of resistance against the harmful effects of whiteness in our lives, the organizations we work for or direct, and the communities in which we serve,” the racist post ridiculously says. 

The only harmful effects of whiteness is that people will use it to excuse racism and enhance their self loathing. 

The only real harm are the workshops themselves whose only intention is to divide us and distract us from the serious problems in this country: crime, poverty, the economy, open borders, China, Russia, Iran, militant Islam, and family values. 

News of the event has some people angry. 

Council Minority Leader Joe Borelli was contacted by many angry teachers and parents asking why fighting "toxic whiteness" has become a top priority of a leftist union that represents a school system plagued by poor performance in the classroom.

“Why is it important for employees of the New York City Department of Education to serve as a form of resistance against the effects of whiteness in their lives, the Department of Education, and the diverse communities in which they serve, which may consist of white students and families?” wrote Borelli (R-Staten Island) in a letter Friday to Tina Puccio, director of the UFT’s Member Assistance Program.

“To be clear, I don’t actually care what your speakers tell your members in an optional and private seminar.

“I care how members will implement the ‘resistance’ against these ‘harmful effects of whiteness’ when dealing with students and parents as part of their employment with the department.”

About 150,000 students — or 14.7% percent of the overall school population — are white, according to the DOE. They are not toxic nor are their parents as a result of their skin color--to believe otherwise is racist and a setback in our culture.


Maud Maron, a public school parent activist, said the workshop isn’t just “unnecessary,” it’s also “racist and bad for students whose education and well-being should be top of mind for everyone, including the teachers’ union.”

“There is nothing wrong with being white, and the sleight of hand of talking about whiteness is not even a fig’s leaf worth of cover,” she added.

“My kids have a white mom and Latino dad. This training says there is something wrong with mom and absurdly calls dad ‘Latinx’ — a word he would never use.” [That may be due to the fact that it's a word invented by a non-Latino or Latina.] 

When asked about the outrage, UFT spokeswoman Alison Gendar said the union “offers professional development on a range of issues” but didn’t offer additional comment because Alison has no good answer.

Racism sucks and so do the woke racists who divide us.

Tweet

Kanye West likes Jews again: the world is now a better place

Former billionaire turned millionaire rapper Kanye West likes Jews again after disliking them and publicly proclaiming it. And all it took for this deep thinking former anti-Semite to stop anti-semiting is having watched a Jonah Hill flick and perhaps checking his bank balance.

The foul mouth rapper said in his first social media post in months that he "likes Jewish people again," after seeing Jonah Hill in 21 Jump Street.

Ye, aka Kanye West, posted:  “Watching Jonah Hill in 21 Jump street made me like Jewish people again.”

That's like really deep.

“No one should take anger against one or two individuals and transform that into hatred towards millions of innocent people. No Christian can be labeled anti-Semite knowing Jesus is Jew,” he added. Sounds like he's feeling publicly isolated after going on a Hitler love affair and he probably misses his billionaire status after losing endorsements and fans who didn't like his racist rhetoric.

“Thank you Jonah Hill I love you,” he said.

Last month, the Anti-Defamation League released a report documenting dozens of anti-Semitic acts perpetrated under the “Ye is right” slogan. His mother should be very proud.

“Kanye West’s repeated anti-Semitic remarks – and his dredging up some of the worst anti-Jewish tropes imaginable — are inspiring people to commit real-world acts of hate,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, ADL’s CEO. 

Anti-Semitic tweets referencing the “Ye is Right” slogan also reached nearly 5 million users of the platform and making West the StopAntisemitism's “Antisemite of the Year” and outstanding scumbag with a beat.

Kanye’s incessant vitriol started in early October, when he tweeted that he would be going “death con 3 on Jewish people.”

He also said Jewish people should “let it go” about the Holocaust and “forgive Hitler.”

A week prior, he told conspiracy theorist Alex Jones that “There’s a lot of things I love about Hitler, a LOT of things.”

And now he watched a movie and changed his life, at least for now. 

Jonah Hill is a miracle worker.

Tweet

Justice Brown Jackson lone dissenter on vacating abortion ruling

She doesn't know what a woman is because she isn't a biologist, and evidently doesn't know what good parenting is because she is a flaming progressive. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson [I will only use her first name once] wrote the only SCOTUS dissent after the U.S. Supreme Court vacated a federal court decision Monday that upheld a minor's right to go to court to get an abortion without her parents' consent.

The high court overturned the lower court ruling that said a state court clerk could be sued for denying a pregnant teen's request permission to get an abortion without her parents' consent. The Supreme Court remanded the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit with instructions to dismiss the case as moot [i.e., subject to debate]. 

In her parent-neutralizing dissent, Jackson criticized the court's application of Munsingwear vacatur, a legal doctrine that addresses what should happen to a court decision when the appealed case becomes moot while it is pending review by a higher court. 

The doctrine states that such decisions should be vacated, with an important exception for cases where the party adversely affected by the vacated decision was not responsible for rendering the case moot.

Pro-Abortion Justice Jackson, who has already been born

"I am concerned that contemporary practice related to so called ‘Munsingwear vacaturs’ has drifted away from the doctrine's foundational moorings," Jackson wrote in her dissent. She is also concerned that parents have parental rights and generally know what's best for their child.

This case stemmed from a lawsuit in Missouri alleging that court clerk Michelle Chapman violated a 17-year-old pregnant teenager's rights by keeping her parents out of the affair. Missouri law requires a pregnant minor to obtain permission from her parents to have an abortion. In certain circumstances, the law allows a minor to get court permission to bypass parental consent but Chapman may have thought the teenager's parents may have known that an abortion would adversely affect their child in the future, or maybe her parents thought that all life is sacred.

When the teenager, referred to as Jane Doe, went to court in 2018 seeking permission to get an abortion, Chapman told her the court would have to notify her parents about the hearing. Doe instead traveled to Illinois, where she obtained court permission and later had her baby killed.

Chapman claimed immunity from the suit, but both a federal district court in Missouri and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit rejected her claim. However, the Supreme Court vacated the 8th Circuit's decision, agreeing with Chapman that the ruling should have been thrown out because the case was made moot by the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the constitutional right to an abortion.

In her dissent, Jackson argued that Munsingwear vacatur should only be extended to "extraordinary" or "exceptional" cases. She wrote that this case became moot when Chapman and the teenager agreed to have their original case in Missouri district court dismissed, asserting that "Chapman contributed to the mootness of this case insofar as she stipulated to its dismissal."

As such, Jackson said it was not unfair to deprive Chapman of her right to appeal. 

"Indeed, Chapman's only argument in support of vacatur is that the Eighth Circuit's opinion was wrongly decided. But mere disagreement with the decision that one seeks to have vacated cannot suffice to warrant equitable relief under Munsingwear," Jackson wrote.

"In my view, it is crucial that we hold the line and limit the availability of Munsingwear vacatur to truly exceptional cases," she insisted, calling Chapman's case, "far-from-exceptional."

"To do otherwise risks considerable damage to first principles of appellate review," she said.

Yes, lawful law, words, legal terms and all that, but a teenager, whose brain is not yet fully developed, should have to discuss this life-altering procedure with her parents.

Tweet

Iran-sponsored militants launch rockets on 2nd US military base in Syria after Biden's "precision airstrikes"

Iran-backed military style jihadis launched a second rocket attack on a U.S. base in Syria on Friday in a retaliatory exchange after President Biden's handler [whoever that is] ordered not very  “precision airstrikes” on their positions. 

Three missiles narrowly missed a US base in northeast Syria  on Friday morning, with two falling in the nearby Al-Omar oil field and another striking a luckless civilian house, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported.

No casualties were reported from the strike but three of the wounded serving as part of a coalition to beat back ISIS militia scumcrumpets had to be medivaced to Iraq, according to the Pentagon.

The missile attack occurred hours after one of Biden's handlers ordered US Central Command to launch “precision airstrikes” from F-15 fighter jets on groups linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, killing at least 11 and thus scrambling 731 brown-eyed virgins to service the dead in Jannah.

Biden allegedly had airstrikes ordered after an Iranian suicide drone killed a US contractor and injured five US military service members and another contractor at a coalition base near al-Hasakah.

Woke Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin confirmed the airstrikes had targeted the IRGC, which the US designates as a terrorist group mainly because they are. He also said the unmanned drone was of Iranian origin.

“As President Biden has made clear, we will take all necessary measures to defend our people and will always respond at a time and place of our choosing,” Austin said, obviously covering for the fact that Biden makes nothing clear. “No group will strike our troops with impunity.” [With the exception of those terrorists who killed 13 Americans during the fustercluck known as the Afghanistan withdrawal.]

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said on Friday the US airstrikes had killed 11 terrorists, including six confirmed pro-Iran militants and two Syrians.

The woke and useless White House national security spokesman John Kirby on MSNBC called the Iran-backed missiles “completely ineffective” and noted that no US personnel were harmed.

“It is not uncommon, when we take a retaliatory strike like this, for them to answer right back with some ineffective rocket fire — and these were largely, completely ineffective,” Kirby said. “Nobody was hurt, no U.S. casualties at all.”

US Central Command General Michael Kurilla promised further action if necessary.

“We are postured for scalable options in the face of any additional Iranian attacks,” he said in a statement.

Kurilla informed Congress on Thursday that since January 2021 Iran has been behind at least 78 attacks on US positions in Syria.

And still they enrich uranium while we do nothing to stop them.

“Iran’s vast and deeply resourced proxy forces spread instability throughout the region and threaten our regional partners,” Kurilla told members of the House Armed Services Committee.Groups linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps were behind Friday’s attack.

And while war seems like it could be on the horizon, we have a President who couldn't run a lemonade stand, much less a country; a Vice President who sounds like she's perpetually drunk or plain stupid and confused; and a military more concerned with transgender and gay issues than doing what it's intended to do.

Tweet