London play to "Make Racism Great Again" by banning White people from the audience

Yes Virginia, there are racists in our midst.

In London a play is only inviting an "all-Black identifying audience" to two upcoming performances as 

the racist playwright declared that it is only intended to open up the performance to groups that do not traditionally feel welcome in a theater setting. Where this cretin is getting his information must be from the broken synapses of his cerebral cortex because Blacks are not the persecuted, unwelcome people he pretends they are, that negative honor would go to the Jews.

"In other circles it would be illegal and racial discrimination," a senior Tory Member of Parliament told the Daily Mail. "I don't understand why this isn't." 

Because it is but our cowardly politicians are too afraid to rock the boat and have fallen slave to minorities on the left in several areas of culture: transgenderism, pronoun requirements, leftist riots that include anti-Israel/anti-Semitic protests that turn into unchained violence.

The racist playwright, Jeremy O. Harris, told BBC Sounds that he was "so excited" to open up ticket sales only to people who identify as Black on July 17 and September 17, that he had to change his underpants several times a day since making the announcement.

Jeremy O. Harris: racist par excellence

"[I]t is a necessity to radically invite them in with initiatives that say 'you're invited'. Specifically you,'" Harris said, not realizing that he is not merely a racist against White people, but evidently has negative beliefs about Black people too, thinking of them as some kind of fragile flowers that need to receive special consideration.

This isn't the first time this has occurred. According to a website about the "BLACK OUT" initiative begun by Harris after he wrote "Slave Play," it "is the purposeful creation of an environment in which an all-Black-identifying audience can experience and discuss an event in the performing arts, film, athletic, and cultural spaces – free from the White gaze."

White gaze? 

Why is it that certain groups of people, not just Blacks, are allowed to spew the bile of racism with impunity? Imagine, just imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and only White people were allowed to attend the play.

Yes, Virginia, anyone can be racist, and in this case, it's disgusting.

Tweet

Is DEI DIEing? Legal challenges suggest what's going on with some companies

As companies have adopted the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) philosophy as a focus in the hiring of individuals, we are seeing the problems that this has created: airlines have had significantly more emergency instances, government hires are not necessarily qualified for the tasks they must deal with, and institutions of higher learning, like Harvard, hire incompetent plagiarists.  And let's not talk about the Biden administration lest you be called a racist for your observations.

Of course there are people from all walks of life that can handle the jobs out there, but when companies use skin color or how folks identify, or what pronouns they use, that makes no sense in the job market.

Even top universities and colleges have used DEI in their admission process, so Asian and White students have a higher hurdle to jump over in their grades than, say, a Black lesbian woman, for example. Again, this is not to say that Black lesbians are not as bright as White straight women--it is to say that this criteria is ludicrous.

In one case, a lovely Nigerian woman (pictured above) named Sophia Danner-Okotie, had plans for a clothing line inspired by her native country, but now Fearless Fund, the company that was going to lend her the funding is experiencing legal battles.

The case against the Fearless Fund alleges that one of its grant programs discriminates against non-Black women and asks the courts to imagine a similar program designed only for White applicants. It is among a growing list of lawsuits against corporate diversity and inclusion programs that are making their way through the courts this year.

And the case highlights the unconstitutionality of the company.

It's like affirmative action, a policy that favors Blacks over Whites and Asians. Cases have been filed by conservative activists after the Supreme Court’s June ruling ending affirmative action in college admissions and are now seeking to set a similar precedent in the working world.

The system being called for is meritocracy, where the best person for the job, the school or whatever, gets what they seek. This will make things run better [like the government], and safer [like airlines]. 

Equal opportunity means just that--it doesn't mean unequal opportunity.

Tweet

NAACP issues travel advisory for blacks to major Democratic-run cities

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) issued a formal travel advisory for Democrat-run cities in order to ensure the safety of travelers.

The following Democrat-run cities are [in no special order of crime and violence]:

Detroit, MI          Rochester, NY           Baltimore, MD       West Palm Beach, FL    Modesto, CA     

Greensboro, NC.     Cincinnati, OH      Vallejo, CA        Hartford, CT    Indianapolis, IN   New Haven, CT    

Springfield, MA  Minneapolis, MN      Baton Rouge, LA          Houston, TX        Nashville, TN

Lansing, MI        New Orleans, LA     Rockford, IL.           Oakland, CA    San Bernardino, CA              

Milwaukee, WI   Albuquerque, NM        Cleveland, OH       Little Rock, AR   Memphis.    St. Louis, MO  

but the leader of all them is . . . wait for it . . . Chicago! with 1965 crimes per 100,000 and 275 murders in 2019.

More people, particularly people of color, are killed in any one of these cities in a year than were killed in the last nine years in the Afghanistan war.

It's perfectly understandable why the NAACP would want their Black members to avoid Democrat-run cities and we Americans, especially we conservative white men, stand behind their decision to protect their members by this advisory.

The streets of Democrat-run cities are dangerous to everyone and we on the right commend the organization for looking out for its people because all lives matter.

Tweet

White student sues Howard U., a historically Black college for $2M over racial discrimination

A White student at Howard University's law school is suing the school for racial discrimination. The student Michael Newman alleges the school created a "hostile environment."

Newman began attending Howard University School of Law in the 2020 fall semester and remained there for two years but was expelled in September 2022. His lawsuit is for $2 million in monetary damages for "pain, suffering, emotional anguish and damage to his reputation."

Vice President and Chief Communications Officer for the school, Frank Tramble, said he couldn't comment "substantively" because of the pending lawsuit, he said that the university “is prepared to vigorously defend itself in this lawsuit as the claims provide a one-sided and self-serving narrative of the events leading to the end of the student’s enrollment at the University.”

Newman suffered “depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts” as a result of “public ostracism, vilification and humiliation,” the lawsuit claims. While no data supports the possibility that Newman is a snowflake, the possibility is quite substantial.

At one point, Global Head of Diversity Recruiting Reggie McGahee allegedly told Newman he had become the most hated student McGahee had seen during his tenure at the university, according to the suit. The reason for the hatred generated by Newman is not clear.

When Newman raised concerns over his treatment to school administrators, the law school’s dean allegedly denied that White students at Howard Law, and Newman in particular, faced racial discrimination to any degree. There will be difficulty on Newman's part to prove that his claims are true, and this is, let us never forget, Black History Month.

Following discussions of Newman’s purported racial insensitivity, students learned of a tweet from Newman’s private Twitter account that included a picture of a slave baring his badly scarred back with the caption, “But we don’t know what he did before the picture was taken,” according to the lawsuit.

Wow!

Newman claimed the tweet was mocking commentators who “attempt to explain away videos of police brutality by claiming the victim must have committed wrongdoing before the video started.” He alleged that students responded with references to his race, gender, sexual preference, age and personal appearance. [H/T NY Post]

I don't know about you, but if I was attending a Black University as a White person, the topic of race would be off the table in all forms of communication.

The court documents claim the trouble began when the pandemic caused the university to shift over to remote learning. Therefore the communication by students was through online forums only and GroupMe chats, according to Newman.

After a symposium featured a Black speaker in the run-up to the 2020 election, Newman said he posted on a professor’s forum page asking if further dialogue could be had on “whether: (1) black voters didn’t question turning to government for solutions, and (2) reliably voting for the same party every election disincentivized both parties from responding to the needs of the black communities.”

Some students responded negatively to Newman’s post and reached out to school administrators, prompting Newman’s removal from one of his group chats for the class, according to the allegations.

Newman also described feeling “utterly disenfranchised” at the school and compared himself to a black student at a primarily white university. The student response was again largely negative, with some calling his comment “offensive,” he claimed.

Newman, who appears to be a horrible communicator, repeatedly apologized for offending anyone, stressing he was seeking to “learn, not just law, but to learn the thoughts and experiences of people of color,” the lawsuit stated.

The attorneys representing Newman filed the suit in federal court.

Newman’s lawyers will try to prove the school broke its contract with Newman, a student who attended on a scholarship, after a series of incidents and accusations led to multiple review panels and hearings that resulted in his expulsion, according to the lawsuit.

* * *

Sex!? Yes, sex sells but so what? If you enjoy reading this blog, please check out the ads on this page. There is absolutely no obligation to buy anything [this isn't Communist China or Russia, after all] but simply clicking on an ad brings sweet, sweet revenue to my blog and helps in the fight against fascism. But sex is still okay, right?

* * *

I'm not sure if Newman is a racist, but I don't believe so. I believe true racists would not attend a school where their race was in the vast minority. But I'm certainly not certain and welcome your opinions.

Peace out.

Tweet

FL police chief fired for racist behavior

Larry Scirotto: a gay mixed race racist

Fort Lauderdale -- Florida police chief Larry Scirotto has been fired after an investigation found that he is a racist when deciding promotion practices. He once remarked "that wall is too white" when referring to photos of the department's command staff.

Scirotto, 48, a self-loathing mixed-race gay man, took over the Fort Lauderdale PD last year in August. According to press releases on Thursday, he was fired by the city after several discrimination complaints alleged that he made hiring and promotion decisions like alleged President Joe Biden makes nomination decisions: with an illegal race-based approach. The only difference is, Scirotto isn't the President of the United States, and Joe Biden holds that title.

Scirotto is a former assistant chief in Pittsburgh. He became the first openly gay chief hired in Fort Lauderdale last year.

The bias complaints against him concluded in a 12-page investigation that he created a "divisive atmosphere" in the department and mentioned the statement [above] about "that wall is too white," and "I'm gonna change that," according to CNN. Brian Stelter, who says he is not gay, did not contribute to this report.

The investigation also found that Scirotto had asked, "which one is blacker?" when considering a promotion, but Scirotto, now the former police chief, denies he said. Perhaps he actually asked, "which one is cuter?"

Scirotto is quoted in the report of saying that he intended to "consider diversity at every opportunity," rather than qualifications, which that implies, but at least this a-hole is woke.

“Overall, there is a very divisive atmosphere within the department based on the perception the chief is intentionally using race, gender and sexual orientation as attributes necessary for promotions,” the report reads. “While the goal to diversify is an important and laudable goal it must be accomplished in a legally permissible manner.”

Police work, like Supreme Court Justices, are not Affirmative Action decisions, although you would never know that under the Biden administration.

Scirotto defended his racial/gender/sexual proclivities decisions in the media, but having said what he reportedly said prior to his selections, he would not have needed to justify himself in the first place with statements like he gave in an interview with Fox affiliate 7News:

“Those minority groups are now being treated as if they were less than deserving, and that’s not the case, and it never was."

“The promotions that I made are of the minority candidates, were because they were exceptional candidates, and they excelled in every level of the organization,” he reportedly added. “They deserved to be promoted, and by the way, they happened to be minority. It wasn’t because they were minority.”

Sounds a lot like Joe Biden telling the American public "I'm gonna nominated a Black woman to the Supreme Court."

* * *

For more hard-hitting content, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against global warming, the heebie-jeebies and COVID-19.

* * *

Had Biden and Scirotto just hired the best person for the job, nobody would have called it racist or sexist. But they're obviously "opposite of intelligent" to have made that decision, as Trump might have said.

Tweet

MSNBC's racist host calls Gabby Petito case "missing White woman syndrome"

If MSNBC host Joy Reid went missing and Tucker Carlson referred to the story as "missing Black woman syndrome," the Left's collective butts would explode [because that's where their thinking comes from].

 Reid, who is a racist Black woman [with a homophobic history she did not get canceled over], was discussing the media's coverage of Gabby Petito, 22, who went missing and has since been found dead. The coroner's autopsy report stated that she was a homicide victim and the story has made national news, perhaps as a distraction from the Biden debacle with Afghanistan.

In her angry, 'all White men are racists'-themed show, "The Reid Out," she agreed that the Petito family deserved "answers and justice" as to the cause of the White girl's death, BUT she believes the same media attention doesn't hold for non-White people when they go missing.

No, the media's attention only holds for people of color when they resist arrest and are shot by a White cop, even when the cop's life is in danger. In fact, more unarmed White men than Black men, are shot by police annually, and the numbers for both groups is small. 

The media's attention doesn't hold when a Black Capitol Police officer shoots and kills Ashli Babbett, an unarmed White woman entering the Capitol Building, the only person to die of violence at the Jan. 6th protest.

"It goes without saying that no family should ever have to endure that kind of pain. And the Petito family certainly deserves answers and justice," Reid said. "But the way this story has captivated the nation has many wondering, why not the same media attention when people of color go missing?"

"Well, the answer actually has a name: Missing White woman syndrome. The term coined by the late and great Gwen Iffil to describe the media and public fascination with missing White women like Laci Peterson or Natalee Holloway, while ignoring cases involving missing people of color," this disgusting racist said, making reference to two high-profile cases of missing women.

Here's the thing, even MSNBC covered the case extensively and had an opinion piece Monday on its website. And when you get right down to it, even Reid covered the case, albeit in her typical racial tones. If there was no such thing as racism, Reid would be out of a job.

Reid spent the rest of the segment talking about missing Black and Native Americans she claims to have never heard about in the same way of the Petito case. Perhaps this is due to her ignorance, or the possibility that Petito was somewhat of a known Instagram entity.

Reid cited statistics from the Black and Missing Foundation suggesting the disparity in media coverage between White and non-White women was due to how they're classified, as runaways, for example. She believes minorities don't get the media coverage because it's thought they live most of their lives with crime and poverty as a regular part of their existence.

Reid ended the segment by suggesting that missing women of color weren't noticed as much because they didn't look like the daughters or granddaughters of newsroom executives, as opposed to Black news anchors and hosts like Joy Reid, Al Sharpton, Roland Martin, Lester Holt, Isha Sesay, Hoda Kotb, Tamron Hall, and last and least, Don Lemon, to name a few hosts of color.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Tweet

Biden calls Black man 'boy' at FEMA briefing

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."  Joe Biden on Barack Obama

Co-President Joe Biden called a Black adviser "boy" while mush-mouthing at a FEMA briefing Monday as he introduced former Louisiana congressman and now senior adviser Cedric Richmond. But at least he didn't refer to him as "clean" as he did in the quote above referring to former president Obama.

"I'm here with my senior adviser and boy who knows Louisiana very, very well and New Orleans, Cedric Richmond," our brain dead President said at the briefing to discuss Hurricane Ida that destroyed much of Louisiana

Now in case you don't know it [and if you don't, congratulations] the term "boy" is considered to be a derogatory term against Black men. 

Biden also made a racist remark during his presidential campaign when he infamously claimed that if a Black person did not vote Democrat, then they "ain’t black." And while many in the Black community were upset by this stupid remark, most still voted for Biden because of Bad Man Orange. Ironically, the left lied about Trump and said he is a racist and anti-Semitic when, in fact, there is no evidence to substantiate this disgusting claim. In fact, his daughter and grandchildren are Jewish.

Insofar as Biden is a racist, I have my doubts. Perhaps we should ask Cornpop, a guy who knows him better than anyone, right down to the hair on Biden's legs. He will not be as clean, bright and as articulate as Obama is, but maybe he can clue us in on just how not racist Joe really is.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

ESPN analyst said Team USA added a "token" white NBA player: they're scared to send an "all Black team"

ESPN analyst [emphasis on 'anal'] and a former NBA basketball player Jalen Rose commented that Cleveland Cavaliers player Kevin Love made Team USA to play in the Olympics only because he's White, and said the team doesn't have the "courage" to send "an all-black team" to play at the games, proving the racists come in all colors and sizes.

Rose, whose surname seems less apropos to his character than the stuff that fertilizes roses, apparently has a short memory. In 2016, aka the last Olympics, the USA sent an all-black team to shoot hoops at the games.

This gold medal-winning U.S. basketball team was made up of all black players and no white players, nor any conservatives voiced opposition to the team's makeup.

"Kevin Love is on the team because of tokenism," the racist Rose said on his "Jalen & Jacoby" podcast Thursday. "Don't be scared to make an all-black team representing the United States of America. I'm disappointed by that."

Truly, a bigger ass can no man find.

Rose argued that Love didn't deserve a spot on the 12-man roster representing the U.S. in Tokyo next month — and that anyone who watched the NBA this year could clearly see that. He's white and that makes him a racist by virtue of how he was born according to asses like Rose and critical race theory.

"Anybody that watched the league this year knows Kevin Love did not have a stellar season, was not the best player on his team, and did not necessarily deserve to be on this squad," he argued.

The former NBA player acknowledged that he's still "excited" about the team and is sure that the U.S. will win gold at the Olympics, but said that will not stop him from critiquing the decision to include Love, who played in only 25 games this season and averaged 12.2 points, 7.4 rebounds, and 2.5 assists. 

But what about equity? What about racial justice for the white man? And why aren't there short players and women in the NBA?

Love joins a roster that includes Kevin Durant, Damian Lillard, Devin Booker, Bradley Beal, Khris Middleton, Draymond Green, Jayson Tatum, Jrue Holiday, Bam Adebayo, Zach LaVine, and Jerami Grant. He is the only white player on the team and he cannot help it as that was how he was born.

Rose believes the Phoenix Suns' Deandre Ayton should have been given Love's spot on the roster, and he obviously doesn't really believe in equity unless it's for people with more melanin.

Rose is just another regressed progressive who would like to see the white man be put in his place, but only after he pays reparations for something he didn't do, to people he didn't do it to, nor had it done to them, of course.

With racists like Rose, we are in deep trouble.

Remember 2016 everyone! We won the gold!

Why not consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.

Tweet

If attacking Fauci is attacking science, is attacking Don Lemon attacking stupidity?

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the second-most prominent doctor in American after Dr. Jill Biden, has recently claimed that people who opposed his views on the COVID-19 recommendations and statements he made are "anti-science," has doubled-down on his self praise. This arrogance is coming from the same "expert" who claimed that a person could catch AIDS sitting in the same room as an AIDS patient. It's coming from the same guy who first said you didn't need to wear a mask, to then saying you did need to wear a mask, to saying you should consider wearing two masks, to prevent the spread of COVID. 

Axios, citing New York Times writer Kara Swisher’s podcast, "Sway," quoted Fauci defending his record on COVID-19.

"It is essential as a scientist that you evolve your opinion and your recommendations based on the data as it evolves…and that’s the reason why I say people who then criticize me about that are actually criticizing science," he said, obviously forgetting that nothing actually "evolved" between his opinion changes.

Recently, another bright light in the world of current events, Comedy News Network's Don Lemon, wondered aloud as to whether White people view Black people as "fully human." He questioned whether White people view Blacks as "deserving of the American dream," as he made his idiotic claim in a Washington Post Magazine's Sunday feature, which primarily discussed his silly career, his book, and his life as an incredibly gay Black news anchor on the fakest of all fake news media.

Don Lemon and his racist White partner Tim Malone

Reporter Eric Easter [who is being pressured by the left to change his name to Eric Dayoff] asked Lemon if revealing "more personal things" about his life was his intention with his latest book.

"I feel like I’ve had to do that because I don’t think America has seen enough people like me," Lemon answered facetiously. "I don’t think America intimately knows enough people like me. I would love America to see Black people, especially Black gay men as — and I hate this word — normal, and as human beings and as part of the culture. That we have our vulnerabilities and our struggles, but we also have our successes. We love, we hurt, and we go through trials and tribulations just like anyone else. I don’t know if America sees Black people and especially Black gay men as fully human, and as deserving of the American Dream."

OMG, what a victim of life poor Don Lemon is. What a tragedy and a travesty of something or other.

"We’re living in two different realities as Black and White people," he said while adding that Donald Trump was the "wake-up" call for people to recognize it but that Dr. Anthony Fauci is the exception to the rule that all White people suck and are racists.

On one side of his mouth, Lemon has requently blasted former President Donald Trump since the 2020 election, while on the other side of his mouth, he tells the media to stop talking about him. Hey, that's my job, he seems to believe.

When asked about Dr. Fauci, all Lemon could do was praise him and blow his horn, so to speak.

So, if attacking Dr. Anthony Fauci is attacking science, is attacking Don Lemon attacking stupidity? Comment.

Why not consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.

Tweet

San Francisco: What the left doesn't want us to know about anti-Asian hate crimes

The suspect in multiple attacks on Asian men in San Francisco last week, will be charged with hate crimes, District Attorney Chesa Boudin said Saturday. What isn't being announced is the alleged attacker is NOT A WHITE SUPREMACIST. In fact, Sidney Hammond is a 26-year-old Black man.

Hammond was arrested on April 30 and charged with aggravated assault with force. He allegedly attacked an Asian man pushing his 1-year-old baby in a stroller.

The alleged scumbag was caught on surveillance video from a nearby grocery store and shows the Asian man, 36, being thrown to the ground and repeatedly punched, presumably for having the temerity of being Asian.

The San Francisco police first told the media that the attack "appeared to be random" and "no words were exchanged during the incident." However, on Saturday Boudin said the department received new evidence that the assault was "racially motivated."

As it turns out, the previous day to this attack, Hammond was caught on video allegedly attacking a 61-year-old Asian man for the same immutable characteristic. Apparently worried the old man might defend himself, Hammond sneaked up from behind and made his move.

The victim in that attack appeared to hit his head on a pole as he fell to the ground, according to a video obtained by KPIX. He had visible injuries to his face and head but refused medical aid.

And one day prior to the attack on the 61-year-old man, Hammond had been in San Francisco County Jail for an incident in which he allegedly threatened AND assaulted a grocery store worker while in the process of stealing something allegedly. He had been released on March 28 for 7 minutes of good behavior and allowed back out on the streets.

These attacks come at a time when anti-Asian attacks have become the new media darling. Earlier in the week, two elderly Asian women were brutally attacked and stabbed in San Francisco. One woman had a lung pierced and the other needed the knife to be removed at the hospital.

Patrick Thompson who is 54 and NOT A WHITE SUPREMACIST, was arrested and charged with two counts of premeditated attempted murder, two counts of assault with a deadly weapon and two counts of elder abuse.

Patrick Thompson

Boudin said Friday that his office is working with police to determine if hate crimes are warranted in that case.

Duh.

The media has been constantly pushing the Black Lives Matter and the 1619 Project narrative that everyone who voted for Donald Trump is a white supremacist. Now they're pushing the narrative that anti-Asian hate crimes are due to white supremacists. But the FBI crime statistics debunks that narrative. 

White people do not represent the biggest violent crime threat to Asians. In fact, the FBI figures show whites are significantly underrepresented compared to their per capita population.

It seems that the problem grew after six Asian women who worked in Atlanta massage parlors were killed and the press jumped on the "white supremacy" bandwagon since the shooter was white.

But the shooter admitted that the attack had nothing to do with the race of the women, rather it was due to his own sex addiction. Also, the media didn't give much detail about the other two dead victims, because they were white women.

But leave it to the Compromised News Network to discount the words of the shooter and blame the attack on "white nationalism and domestic extremism." The morons over at the network explained their slanted thinking in an article titled ‘White supremacy and hate are haunting Asian Americans’.

But unbiased statistics tell a different story, and the Washington Examiner points out the FBI statistics in which white people comprising 62% of the national population, committed 24% of violent crimes against Asians in 2018.

Blacks comprise 13% of the population but committed 27.5% of all violent crimes against Asian Americans in the same year.

So let's cut the crap.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

 

CNN's Fredo does his version of "You ain't Black" like he is

Is Chris "Fredo" Cuomo racist? Probably not, but there is ample proof that the Compromised News Network's village idiot is a total jerk and his latest statement was deemed "f**king offensive."

The 50-year-old overachieving brother of embattled Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) was immediately blasted after a clip was shared Friday showing him hand over to CNN colleague Don LeMon by singing the theme to 1970s’ TV show "Good Times."

Laughing awkwardly like a southern belle, his eyes shyly lowered, LeMon asked his fellow bubble-brain how he knew the words to the TV series about a black family living in a public housing project in Chicago.

"You know I’m Black on the inside," Cuomo responded. And if you don't believe Fredo, you ain't Black.

Although LeMon ignored the comment, it was quickly picked up on Twitter where it was discussed with all the venom the social media website could offer on the spur of the moment.

"It’s f–ing offensive," tweeted Sister2Sister magazine managing editor Aisha Staggers, who said that "Black is not a costume."

After that post, Staggers' mother washed her fingers out with soap.

But Staggers is correct--black is not a costume--it's a skin color resulting from a higher level of melanin than other skin colors. Anything else about black being other than a skin color is based on learned behavior and is often racist.

Many commentators compared Fredo to his embattled brother, [aka "Handy Andy"] who now faces myriad calls for his resignation, not because he is responsible for 15,000 deaths of helpless nursing home residents from COVID-19, but from acting inappropriately with 5 (so far) women. 

The governor's sexual misconduct is merely a distraction used to turn your attention away from how Andy was covered by the media and his political buddies. They would be hopelessly embarrassed if he was impeached over his handling of the coronavirus.

Other Twitter users also had something to say about Fredo's comment:

In the "black on the inside"
"Maybe his heart," @docsamson829 joked.

Rev. Mary Dande said she "had to turn off the television because I’m not here for that nonsense." She tweeted:

CNN needs to have some sensitivity training with their on-air personalities

Another good idea would be to have CNN actually cover the news on both sides of the aisle. Why is it that Fredo could do a comedy routine with Handy Andy when everyone thought the governor was doing a good job, but as soon as he got outed as a sexual predator who kills old folks, he no longer could cover him because "he's my brother." 

It's truly amazing how people on the left don't see the media for what it is.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Was it just a Biden gaffe or is there more to his thinking

"Poor kids are just as talented as white kids."

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American [Barack Obama] who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."

"Look, John's last-minute economic plan does nothing to tackle the number one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: Jobs. J-O-B-S."

If President Trump said any of the above, the mainstream media would blast him relentlessly. Not so much with Biden, whose gaffes are sometimes characterized as "cute," or "[H]ey it's Joe."

Biden's latest gaffes [aka mindless screwup] occurred this week and it was on par with his "you ain't black" statement. He was asked by Yahoo News whether he would take a cognitive test. Note in the video [below] how instead of answering the question, he attacks the interview using anger and feigned indignation and demonstrating why indeed, he should be tested.

Another gaffe was in an interview with NPR's Lulu Garcia-Navarro that aired in the convention of the National Association of Black Journalists and National Association of Hispanic Journalists. Biden was asked whether he would "re-engage" with Cuba if he were to be elected. Rather than succinctly answering the question, he went into a comparison of Hispanics and black Americans on the issue of diversity.

“Yes, yes,” the career ineffective politician responded, as reported by Fox News. “And by the way, what you all know, but most people don’t know, unlike the African American community, with notable exceptions, the Latino community is an incredibly diverse community with incredibly different attitudes about different things.”

You can see the clip [below] on his Twitter post:

@JoeBiden: “Unlike the African-American community, with notable exceptions, the Latino community is an incredibly diverse community" pic.twitter.com/CFO4Q40jEI

After the clip went viral, President Trump, who sometimes uses Twitter to communicate, when he isn't being censored, responded, calling Biden’s comments an insult to the American black community.

“Joe Biden, this morning, totally disparaged and insulted the black community. What he said is incredible. I don’t know what’s going on with him, but it was a very insulting statement he made … It was a great insult to the black community.”

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk responded:

“Can anyone explain to me how Joe Biden can get away with calling a black journalist “a junkie” AND then saying that practically all black people are the same in the span of two days without the media caring at all? Can you imagine if his last name was Trump instead of Biden?” 

Can you imagine if his last name was Trump instead of Biden?

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) August 6, 2020

Joe! Dude! No. This is worse than ‘poor kids are just as smart as white kids’. 🤦🏽‍♀️ https://t.co/fsj9kEA08M

— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) August 6, 2020

Regarding the cognitive testing that Biden reacted to when questioned, he may have forgotten that just a few weeks ago he said that he's tested on a daily basis and he would be more than willing to go up against Trump regarding cognitive testing.

And how soon the public forgets because it's "old news."

But the real question to ask yourself is whether he is becoming increasingly more obvious about a deep-seated racism that he had been successful at covering up all these years. They say that people with dementia may display a magnification of their personality that existed before onset of the disorder. That simply would mean that Biden was always a bit of a racist, but was able to cover it up.

What do you think about this idea? Feel free to add a comment below.

Consider following Brain Flushings, it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

Rachel Dolezal goes back to court for welfare fraud case

Washington state -- Rachel Dolezal [aka Nkechi Diallo] has a new court date for her welfare fraud case.

Dolezal, you may remember, is the white woman who identified as a black woman like Elizabeth Warren who identifies as a Native American [to land a better job] but is actually less Native American than most Europeans.

 Rachel Dolezal, the former president of an NAACP chapter in Washington state made headlines in 2015 after her parents debunked her claims of being African-American. She is actually of German descent and is as white as Liz Warren.

FOX 28 Spokane reported that the case will be heard March 4th.

Dolezal, 41, changed her name to Nkechi [without the clicking sound] Diallo in 2016, in order to enhance her delusion of being black or perhaps her deception to land the NAACP job. She was arrested in May 2018 on charges of first-degree theft by welfare fraud, perjury in the second degree and false verification for public assistance, FOX 28 reported.

Rachel as a kid and her parents

Investigators claim that several years ago Dolezal-Diallo began falsifying reports of her income so that she could qualify for public assistance, the station reported. She claimed she was living on just a few hundred dollars a month, donated by friends, the report said.

Due to her claim, she collected nearly $9,000 in state financial assistance from August 2015 to November 2017, Spokane's KHQ-TV reported, citing court documents. But a state investigation of her banking records discovered that she deposited over $80,000 in that same time period, the report said.

The welfare fraud case began in March 2017 after a state investigator received information that Dolezal-Diallo had written a book -- her autobiography, titled "In Full Color." It's about her struggle with being a white-black person in a full color world.

The investigator reviewed Dolezal-Diallo's records and found that she had been receiving money from book sales, speaking engagements, soap making, doll making and the sale of her art, according to the case file.

After the notoriety that followed the June 2015 disclosure by her parents, with whom she has long feuded, Dolezal-Diallo (then only Dolezal) resigned as Spokane NAACP president, was kicked off a police oversight commission, lost a position as a freelance columnist for a weekly newspaper in Spokane and was fired from her job teaching African studies at nearby Eastern Washington University.

Hopefully the welfare fraud case will be all straightened out and Nkechi will be allowed to go back to the life of a white black woman or man, whatever she chooses this time, and once again go on making soap and dolls, and maybe even strudel and wurst.

Well here we are in the beginning of a new year and the world still hasn't come to an end with President Trump in the White House, in spite of what the media and the left [but I repeat myself] would have you believe.

I hope that you will follow Brain Flushings throughout the year and feel free to comment on any issues of concern. Please subscribe and check out the sponsors on these pages too.

Tweet

American University staff and students call for minority-only safe spaces

The students and staff at American University (AU) want "the creation of more spaces for students of color." They believe minority students should have an area on campus where they don't have to deal with white people because there must be something wrong with us. [I am white, my wife is a woman of color and does not agree with AU for some reason.] The school wants an area where minority people can go to be separate from "whitey" in the name of "diversity and inclusion," which absolutely proves the left has everything backwards. [e.g., men are women; women are men; Antifa is anti fascist.]

The racist students are upset with the school's Hub for Organizing Multiculturalism and Equity (HOME) for being "marketed to students of all backgrounds rather than students of color."

It looks like they don't have a clue about what the word "diversity" means. They apparently want revenge on this generation for the generations preceding them.

“HOME doesn’t provide people with a sense of security, with a sense of belonging, when everyone from all types of affinity groups can be there,” said Othniel Malcolm Andrew Harris to AU’s student newspaper, sounding like one of those folks from GLAAD who sees everything in terms of homophobia or sexism, or the #MeToo movement, who thinks every woman is to be believed, every man is to be considered a likely sexual predator, and old Christmas songs are rape culture material.

AU’s student newspaper goes on to say that many students also called for the university to “create a black house” in response to racist incidents on campus.

Yes, segregation will definitely promote harmony and understanding--look at history and just see how that worked out.

Progressives, or leftists, get everything backwards and the scary thing is, they run the academia.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet

Black folks skeptical over Omarosa's verbiage against Trump

You can't swing a dead puffin without hitting a newspaper or magazine that doesn't have at least one piece about Omarosa Manigault Newman. She's the former "Apprentice" villain who was fired three times by Trump and was rehired by him four times--the last being after he became President.

According to the left-leaning Associated Press, black folks just don't buy into Omarosa's claim that President Trump used the bad word for "Negro" or the "N" word as it is often called. And if the AP is making this claim, you just might know it's true.

The AP says the fact that Newman stayed with Trump for over ten years makes her "deeply unpopular with African-Americans who see her as a sellout for aligning herself with a president who has hurled one insult after another at black people."

Her falling out with Trump and her decision to call him a racist as she sells her new book--and in turn, his calling her a "dog"--have not been enough for many African-Americans to invite her back to the family picnic.

Too little, too late, many said.

"Her tell-all mea culpa won't win her any brownie points with most blacks," said Earl Ofari Hutchinson, author of the book 'Why Black Lives Do Matter.' "Their loathing of Omarosa is virtually frozen in stone. She's still roundly lambasted as a two-bit opportunist, a racial sellout and an ego driven hustler."

Few in the black community immediately rushed to defend Manigault Newman after she wrote a book entitled "Unhinged" about her time in the White House. It paints a damning picture of Trump, claiming without evidence that tapes exist of him using the N-word as he filmed "The Apprentice" reality series, on which she co-starred.

She has since stepped up her attacks on Trump as she promotes her book, telling The Associated Press on Tuesday that the president is "a racist, a misogynist, a bigot."

"I want to see this nation united as opposed to divided," she said. "I don't want to see a race war, as Donald Trump does."

The only war the future may hold involving race, is the race between black unemployed folks to fill out a job application faster than their competition. There has been an increase of 700,000 jobs for blacks alone since Trump took office. This is about three times as many jobs than Obama created in his entire presidency. This is now the lowest black unemployment in American history.

Puffin swinging

The Boston Herald wrote that Trump is "making life better for black Americans everywhere you look while his predecessor fumbled."

Community organizers don't "fumble," they bs.

According to Rasmussen, black support for Trump has risen to 31 percent. That's up by 13 percentage points since last year.

Omarosa needs to get together with Maxine Waters and take to the streets. There she can hawk her novel.




Tweet

Maxine Waters wants white folks to pay black folks reparation

If Democrats win the House in this year's midterms, crazy Maxine Waters promises that white people will pay black people for being black people. It's called reparations but it doesn't repair anything, but it certainly does make everyone angry and divided.

And I suspect Waters has a plan to pocket some of those nice reparations all for herself. After all, she had been named  one of the most corrupt members of Congress by  Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. 

Waters appeared in Selma, Alabama on Saturday with CNN commie Angela Rye. She attacked President Trump, which is her main political platform, saying: "He's a bully--he has a bully mentality." Of course, she never gave specifics but that usually doesn't matter when you're preaching to the choir.

"We need someone in the presidency who not only has good sense, but understands diplomacy and understands what we need to do to have peace in this world so we can all look forward to the possibility that we're someday going to have a world that's about peace and justice and respect for individual liberty," she said, not mentioning how that can be done when the world still has North Korea, China, Russia, Iran and other dictatorships that would like to destroy us.

Comrade Rye asked the raving lunatic "Is that your stump speech for 2020?" 

Waters giggled like a little confused child as the crowd applauded. Rye went on, "Is she running? Is she running?"

Oh, I hope so, but Waters didn't answer due to a low hearing aide battery, perhaps.

The an attendee pushed Waters to call for reparations and take up a bill John Conyers sponsored in this House previously.

Waters said she would call for reparations. "I'd be happy to do that. That's no problem," she shouted through her dentures.

"In order to get where we need to go on this issue and other issues, we really got to understand that 2018 is important in taking back the House and taking back the Senate," she said, adding, "And of course, we've got to get the White House back."

She ended her bloviating by criticizing HUD Secretary Dr. Ben Carson. She told the crazed audience that she was going to "take care" of him, which sounds either like a threat or a sexual innuendo.

Hopefully for Dr. Carson's sake, it's the former.


Tweet

Activists say Harlem Globetrotters have too many black men on team

Equality activists are pressuring the Harlem Globetrotters to end their reliance on a team saturated with black men.

Diversity "experts" ordered the team to "open their minds" and enlist more white female lesbian and straight shooters, Chinese, Japanese, Hopi Indian, Jewish, Hindu, Jain, gay white men, straight white men, transgender this and thats, Muslim women, Muslim men, gay Muslim men and women, Apaches, Vietnamese 'little people' (a rarity in basketball) and the blind.

Insofar as their white opponents go, The Washington Generals, they need to be allowed to win half the games and the same diversity measures that need to be applied to the Globetrotters must also be applied to them, according to diversity "experts."

"It's ridiculous that the Globetrotters never lose. I mean like what's the point of coming to a game if you already know who's going to win?" Gladys Finklemeister told Brain Flushings reporter Vinny Boombots. 

"And why is everyone on the Globetrotters black? Can't there be a few white people and people of variegated colors playing for them? It's crazy," she said.

The team's sponsor, Inner Mongolia Mengniu Dairy Industry, a manufacturing and distribution company of dairy products in the People's Republic of China, is the official marketing partner of the Harlem Globetrotters. 

Mengniu claims that it's their concern as to how many tickets are sold to the games the team plays, but it isn't their concern to meet diversity quotas and they anticipate no changes in the team's race or sexual orientation.

But social justice warriors aren't giving up so easily. They plan to march outside Globetrotter events until things change and the Washington Generals win one for a change.

To follow Brain Flushings, click the Follow tab in the margin




Tweet

Trump racists fire professor because of her skin color

(Photo: Heat Street)

They were racists so they had to be pro-Trump supporters. After all, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (Dummy-NY) said that "every racist in America voted for Donald Trump" therefore they voted for him.

But this was a black college in Missouri where a white professor was fired "because of the color of her skin," a state appeals court ruled.

And the evidence was clear. Beverly Wilkins was awarded nearly $5 million--including $3.5 million in punitive damages--based on her claim that she was discriminated against in favor of less senior black teachers.

Wilkins was hired as an adjunct professor in the Education Department at Harris-Stowe in St Louis, in 2001. But in 2010, after she successfully rose to full-time instructor as a non-tenure-track professor, she was unexpectedly fired from her position by the Board of Regents due to alleged "reductions in state funding."

Her 2015 lawsuit tells a different story. She claimed that two of her black colleagues having taught for less than time than her, were allowed to keep their jobs.

And she was replaced by a new and part-time instructor for a total of $23,000--more than she was getting paid in her position.

There's more, but suffice it to say, this is a clear-cut case of racial bias, or racism. Even the emails of the dean repeatedly spoke of her desire to make the education department "blacker."

So I guess they all voted for Donald Trump.

Tweet

Black artists want Whitney Museum to destroy work of white artist

Black artists are protesting a painting by a white artist, Dana Schutz of New York. They claim she is racially insensitive and they should know because they are black and she is white.

The work in question is titled "Open Casket" (2016) and is based on a famous photo from the funeral of Emmett Till, a 14-year-old African American child who was lynched in Mississippi in 1955. 

Till was falsely accused of flirting with a white woman and the racists beat him and lynched him. 

The Schutz painting depicts the teen's body lying in an open coffin; his face is mutilated and his chest is turned toward the viewer. His mother requested an open coffin so that all could witness the horrible brutality of the racist attack of which he was a victim.

The painting is currently on display at the 2017 Whitney Biennial of Friday. Several black artists physically took turns standing in front of the artwork for several hours to block it from being viewed by the public.

One artist, Parker Bright, (whose surname is obviously an oxymoron) wore a t-shirt with the slogan "Black Death Spectacle" on the back and "No lynch mob" on the front.

"I wanted to confront people with a living, breathing black body," he told The Guardian. 

British-born Hannah Black penned an open letter to museum curators regarding the appropriation of black suffering by white artists as another example of systematic racial oppression. She not only wants the painting to be removed, she wants it "destroyed" and "prevented from entering any market of museum."

If you use the appropriation argument, then you would believe that Black's work and the work of other non-white individuals should not be allowed to be hung in museums if the medium is in acrylics. 

Acrylics were invented in 1934 by German chemical company BASF and patented by Otto Rohm and Otto Haas. Both Ottos were white.

If Hannah Black or any other non-white artist uses oil-based paint for their work, they are appropriating the invention of that medium from Flemish artist Jan van Eyck (1390 - 1441). They need to cease and desist.

Then there's the stone carvings that are so ancient, we can only trace them back to the Greeks, India, Egypt and most of Europe. Africa is not in the mix, so if you're black, you ought not to be working in stone.

"The subject matter is not Schutz's," Black posted on Facebook. "White free speech and white creative freedom have been founded on the constraint of others, and are not natural rights. The painting must go."

Now that's presumptuous of Hannah Black.

The subject medium did not originate in black culture. Acrylics, oils and stone as a medium for art have been used first by whites, Egyptians and Indians, not by Africans. 

But so what?

The argument I'm making is just as ridiculous as the argument that one culture cannot use another culture as their subject matter. Our country has become divided all too much and these black artists would only divide us more if we give in to their demand that we destroy another artist's work.

Personally, I don't feel responsible over what white racists have done in the past and making it a current issue only exacerbates the divide we face in this country. 

I feel angry and upset with racism and it's obvious that racism goes both ways. 


Tweet

Rachel Dolezal, the white 'black' woman may become homeless

Rachel Dolezal, the 'Bruce Jenner' of race, is the infamous white woman who for years passed herself off as black and became the head of the Spokane, Wash. NAACP branch. Now she is jobless and on food stamps, and if things continue along this path, she will soon be homeless.

Rachel, 39, discussed her current situation to The Guardian  and told defiantly them that she's "not going to stoop and apologize and grovel" and revealed that she has only been offered jobs in the porno industry and reality TV, which is not how she rolls.

She said a friend of hers who "identifies as an ATM"  helped her come up with February's rent money but she doesn't know how she's going to pay for March. 

Things can be rough for minorities like Dolezal's--being white but believing you're black in spite of both parents being of white, German origin.

In talking about her belief that she's black, she said, "I do think a more complex label would be helpful, but we don't really have that vocabulary," she told The Guardian. "I feel the idea of being trans-black would be much more accurate than 'I'm white.'" And she blathered on about not being white. 

But there is a word in our vocabulary that describes people who truly believe themselves to be a different race than they are: delusional. 

Obviously, if she knows that she really is white, then she is a liar, charlatan, or simply an opportunist. After all, like Elizabeth Fauxcahontas Warren, Dolezal was able to get a job due to her 'identified race.' And in order to get the job, she kept an actual black person from getting it.

She's the racist!

Ironically, Dolezal sued historically-black Howard University for racial discrimination because she is white. This is the idos of hypocrisy!

Supposedly, Dolezal says she's been turned down for 100 jobs and 30 publishers for her memoir before finding a taker. Gee, Agatha Christie had to wait four years before her first novel was published. Poor Rachel.

Apparently she has also upset another group of people: those with gender dysphoria, or as they prefer to be called, 'transgender.' 

She believes race is a social construct, not biological, which makes me chuckle when it's always the liberals who claim conservatives are 'flat-earthers' who aren't scientific.




Tweet