Fauci Takes Fifth 111 Times Because Answering Questions Would Force Him to Admit He's Not Actually a Deity

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a shocking development that has left half the country clutching their “In Fauci We Trust” prayer cards, Dr. Anthony Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times during his recent Senate grilling. 

Sources close to the hearing confirm the real reason wasn’t fear of perjury, it was sheer, unadulterated pride. The man simply could not bear watching his own golden statue melt under the harsh light of basic questions. 

Former Rolling Stone editor Matt Taibbi dug through the wreckage of Fauci’s July 29 appearance before the Senate Homeland Security Committee and discovered what many already suspected: America’s most celebrated public health rock star spent the pandemic treating the country like his personal arena tour. 

Diary entries paint a portrait of an egotistical asshat clown who demanded federal employees chase cash prizes for him between Zoom briefings, while casually noting that vaccinated people were still getting infected; details he somehow forgot to share with the flock still waiting for their next booster sacrament.

Taibbi observed that Fauci’s chaotic performance did precisely nothing to dent the religious devotion of the faithful Left. Science, the FBI, the CIA, and the entire intelligence community can whisper “lab leak” until they’re blue in the face; Fauci remains their false prophet, an invidious huckster-narcissist whose reckless experiments may have endangered the world. 

One does not simply question the high priest of “I Am Science.” 

Joe Biden’s blanket pardon, issued with the intellectual clarity of a man who once introduced his own shadow as a Cabinet member, somehow failed to cover this particular hearing. Perjury traps yawned open like the mouths of hungry interns. So Fauci took the Fifth. Legal strategy? Partially, but deeper analysis reveals the true motive: pure ego up his wazoo. 

Three hours of systematically dismantling his own temple was simply too much for a man who once believed the adoring media had permanently canonized him. The heart of the matter, as Taibbi noted, was the exquisite legal loophole left by the outgoing Obama administration in 2017. By redefining “potential pandemic pathogen” with the semantic precision of a leprechaun rewriting the rules of a drinking contest, officials created a glorious gray area. 

Suddenly, taking a bat virus that couldn’t infect bats, inserting twelve nucleotides to give it a furin cleavage site, and watching it become devastatingly transmissible to humans wasn’t “gain of function.” It was just creative virology. 

As former CDC Director Bob Redfield helpfully clarified, if you start with something that doesn’t hurt people and make it hurt people, congratulations, you’ve invented a brand-new category of research that definitely doesn’t count. 

Fauci’s diaries seethe with irritation at the “nonsense” in Congress over gain-of-function questions. In his mind, the funding never “likely” caused widespread human transmission, so everything was fine. Never mind the diary entry fretting that Dr. Zheng-Li Shi had been busily adapting spike proteins to human ACE2 receptors for years. Never mind that the virus that escaped Wuhan just happened to possess the exact engineered feature scientists had been discussing. Details, details. 

The important thing was that the paperwork looked clean. 

Taibbi concluded that half the country is still averting its eyes because one blue-state heartthrob sits at the center of the disaster. Investigating the greatest public health catastrophe in a century might require admitting their idol was fallible clusterfrack of a doctor, and that simply cannot be allowed. God help us when the next novel virus needs a little laboratory TLC. 

In the end, Fauci pleaded the Fifth not merely to avoid legal jeopardy, but to spare himself the humiliation of watching his carefully curated legacy go up in flames while he held the match. Sorry, Doc. The secret is out. The temple has fallen. And no amount of Fifth Amendment invocations can put the furin cleavage site back in the bottle.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Mass Passes Bill to allow killing babies up to birth

“The real question today is not when human life begins, but, What is the value of human life? The abortionist who reassembles the arms and legs of a tiny baby to make sure all its parts have been torn from its mother’s body can hardly doubt whether it is a human being. The real question for him and for all of us is whether that tiny human life has a God-given right to be protected by the law — the same right we have.”-- Ronald Reagan

The radical Massachusetts Senate on Friday rammed through a grotesque bill that greenlights the slaughter of healthy unborn babies right up until the moment of birth. Lawmakers have now shipped this atrocity to Gov. Maura Healey, a fervent abortion advocate who is all but certain to sign it into law and further cement the Commonwealth’s status as a sanctuary for the abortion industry.

Democrats [aka socialists] steamrolled the measure this afternoon, deliberately short-circuiting the normal committee process so the full Senate could rubber-stamp the bill before the legislature adjourned. House Bill 5595 had already sailed through the heavily Democrat-controlled House on July 22 by a lopsided 119-33 vote. The babies involved are too young to vote.

Under existing Massachusetts law, abortions are already permitted through 24 weeks—yet even that permissive regime contains only the flimsiest exceptions that effectively allow the procedure until birth. Abortions beyond that point have been restricted to cases where the mother’s life or health is purportedly threatened (a loophole so elastic it can mean virtually anything) or when the child is judged unlikely to survive outside the womb.

This new legislation shreds those last remaining fig leaves. It replaces specific medical criteria with a single, rubber-stamp approval from the abortionist himself. In plain English, it authorizes the killing of babies at any gestational age after 24 weeks—for any reason whatsoever. [If this isn't legal barbarianism, I don't know what is.]

Second- and third-trimester abortions typically involve either dismemberment [cutting off arms, legs, beheading, for example] or labor induction. The latter can and does result in a living child being delivered if the abortionist has not first injected a lethal dose into the baby’s heart to ensure “fetal demise”—a step many openly admit they skip. That is, the baby is born alive and then killed.

The Charlotte Lozier Institute documents that more than 60,000 abortions occur after 15 weeks every year in America, a developmental milestone at which science confirms the unborn child feels excruciating pain. The real science, not the Anthony Fauci version.

Pro-life defenders [aka decent human beings] sounded the alarm: this bill obliterates every remaining protection and licenses the execution of fully viable unborn children up to the very threshold of birth.

“This bill basically allows abortion at any time of the pregnancy and for any reason, so it is absolutely egregious,” said Michael King, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute. He noted that the measure would also “take this whole process of abortion outside of the hospital. So a doctor could do this perhaps anywhere they think is viable to do this kind of procedure and take out the safeguards of a hospital.” 

Massachusetts Citizens for Life President Myrna Maloney Flynn underscored that the legislation offers zero genuine help to women confronting real medical crises. “Women experiencing unimaginable, heart wrenching pregnancy complications absolutely deserve all the support they need, but that support is not what this bill provides,” Flynn remarked. “Instead, this bill ensures increased abortion industry profits and taxpayer-funded late-term procedures.” 

Flynn highlighted that the legislation allows a single doctor “to subjectively decide that any unborn infant can be killed in or outside of a hospital,” thus allowing them to play G_d for real. 

SBA Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser mourned the news of the extreme law passing: “Massachusetts already allows abortion in the first 24 weeks, but that isn’t enough for Democrats whose party holds the position of no limits on abortion whatsoever. If Gov. Healey signs this bill into law, Massachusetts will join 10 states and Washington, D.C. with an all-trimester abortion policy where babies are killed after the point they can survive outside of the womb.” 

“These extreme laws that only 10% of Americans support are enabled by the ‘states-only’ philosophy on abortion. The GOP must abandon the failed ‘leave it to the states’ position and move the country toward a national protection for unborn children across this nation.”

Abortion advocates claim the change is necessary so women need not travel out of state because it should be easy to abort the soon-to-be-born so why should they have to schlep across states?

Responsible medical experts categorically reject the falsehood that intentionally ending a child’s life is ever required to save the mother. 

“It is never medically necessary to purposely end the life of a pre-born child in order to save her mother,” said Christina Francis, a board-certified OB-GYN and CEO of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists. In true emergencies, she explained, a physician must separate the mother from the baby when necessary, but that is not an abortion: “AAPLOG recommends referring to these interventions as ‘maternal-fetal separations’ given the clear difference of intent between those lifesaving treatments and induced abortion.”

Should Healey affix her signature, which the witch likely will, Massachusetts will become the 11th state plus the District of Columbia with literally no limits on abortion—joining a tiny, radical minority. 

The United States remains one of only eight nations on earth, alongside Communist China, that permits abortion at any stage of pregnancy, according to a 2024 study. Meanwhile, another 2024 analysis shows that 46 of 50 European countries impose limits after 15 weeks.

If an alien from another planet came here and saw what we do to our unborn for convenience, or form of birth control, or any other reason, they would be appalled.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Sleepy Joe's Preemptive Pardon of Fauci Won't Cover Any Fresh Lies to Congress, Comer Warns

House Republicans are calling for a rare dose of accountability ahead of Dr. Anthony "Tony" Fauci's Senate hearing Wednesday, a development that has left the nation's most celebrated public health celebrity scrambling to update his memoir title from "I Am Science" to "I Am Science, Your Honor.

"Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), condemns Dr. Anthony Fauci as a 'megalomaniac' and 'infamous villain' following the release of his private diary entries. Johnson alleges Fauci knowingly funded gain-of-function research, contradicted himself on COVID-19's origin, pushed experimental vaccines over early treatments, and oversaw devastating lockdown policies.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY), is warning Fauci that his presidential pardon has limits ahead of the former public health official's high-profile day on Capitol Hill. 

Fauci is set to testify before a GOP-led Senate panel on Wednesday, days after hundreds of pages of his COVID-19 pandemic-era diary entries were made public, revealing a man who spent more time polishing his halo than tracking where the virus came from. "We now know why President Biden gave a blanket pardon to Dr. Fauci. While obsessing about his own fame, Dr. Fauci wasn't truthful with the American people about the origins of COVID and advised schools to be closed," Comer told Fox News Digital."

Americans are still reaping the consequences of Dr. Fauci's actions. 

Biden's pardon doesn't cover Dr. Fauci's testimony this week and if he continues to lie, he must be held accountable. "Fauci was among several recipients of controversial "preemptive pardons" by former President Joe Biden made during the final hours of the Democratic administration. The pardon covers any offenses from January 1, 2014, through its issue date, or anything related "to his service as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as a member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force or the White House COVID-19 Response Team, or as Chief Medical Advisor to the President.

"Because the pardon covers conduct during his government service, there will likely be some debate over whether it would protect him from liability stemming from his testimony. Legal experts on the left are already preparing arguments that "lying under oath" somehow counts as essential pandemic response work. But other House Republicans are also accusing Fauci of behaving in a way that hurts public trust in U.S. health, including the co-chairs of the House GOP Doctors' Caucus, both of whom are physicians themselves and therefore apparently qualified to notice when someone treats science like a choose-your-own-adventure book.

"Dr. Fauci, who never met a mirror he didn't love, put politics above science during the pandemic. He is primarily responsible for the resulting multi-generational erosion of trust in American medicine," 

Rep. Greg Murphy (R-NC), told Fox News Digital. "A perfect example of ego destroying whatever achievements he had prior to the pandemic."Rep. John Joyce, R-Pa., told Fox News Digital that Fauci "must be held accountable" by the House as well as the Senate."The release of Dr. Fauci's diary entries validates what many Americans suspected all along: he was not honest about the origins of COVID-19," Joyce said. 

"His fixation on preserving his own image and maintaining a position of power eroded public trust, undermined the integrity of our public health institutions, and failed the American people." Diary entries made public by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), a medical doctor and longtime Fauci critic and chair of the committee before which Fauci is appearing on Wednesday, show the high-profile doctor reflecting on his pandemic-era fame and raising questions about the disease's origins, mostly while admiring how well the lighting hit his face during television interviews.

Some entries appear to show Fauci taking credit for influencing policies that closed schools during the pandemic, something that has become one of the most hotly debated aspects of how the government handled COVID. But he lied and told the House Oversight Committee in January 2024, "I did not close the schools." 

Historians are now racing to determine which version of Fauci will appear under oath this week: the one who shut down childhood or the one who merely suggested it while looking very concerned on cable news. 

Fauci has long denied any wrongdoing and instead has argued that he's been made a political target by people on the right who are critical of how governments handled COVID-19, a defense that works best when delivered from behind a presidential pardon and a wall of media flattery.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Fauci's Pandemic Memoirs Read Like a Hollywood Audition With a Side of Public Health

While Americans were wiping down groceries, homeschooling kids, closing businesses, canceling funerals, and wondering whether standing six feet apart from grandma was enough to survive the apocalypse, Dr. Anthony Fauci apparently had another pressing concern.

His fan mail.

Newly released private diary entries, published ahead of Fauci's Senate testimony after being subpoenaed by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), paint the portrait of a man who seemed just as fascinated by his exploding celebrity status as by the virus consuming the world.

Instead of reading like the journal of a wartime physician carrying the weight of a global pandemic, the entries tend to resemble the diary of an aspiring influencer who suddenly found himself trending.

"Press still hot and heavy about me," Fauci wrote on April 7, 2020. "Multiple stories per day directly or indirectly involving me."

What a dork.

At the time, thousands of Americans had already died, hospitals were scrambling for supplies, and families were saying goodbye to loved ones over FaceTime. Fauci, meanwhile, appeared to be tracking media mentions like they were stock prices. [Dud I mention he's a dork?]

By May, the self appreciation had only intensified.

"Big front page article abut me appeared in the Washington Post. Very flattering. The situation with my national and international fame is explosive and really unimaginable. It is not hyperbole to say that today I am the most famous and talked about person in the country and one of the most recognizable person in the world," Fauci wrote as he looked in his full-body mirror.

Not content to stop there, he added, "Countless profiles on me in multiple media. I cannot even read all the things that are written about me since I am so busy … seriously. POTUS seems to be enamored of me even though I am taking the spotlight away from him. We are developing a very unique and interesting relationship."

Look at me--I'm Mister Cool

So, while the globe is suffering from a raging pandemic, our humble servant is depicting himself as one of the most recognizable people on Earth.

The diaries also suggest Fauci viewed television appearances less as an opportunity to inform the public than as oxygen.

After complaining that White House officials were limiting his media access, he proudly recorded a conversation with then Vice President Mike Pence.

"I told him that I am being blocked from TV and I needed to get on TV to give the 'risk reduction' message and that I would avoid being pitted against him or the POTUS merely by not playing that game," Fauci wrote. "He did promise that he would get me out there on TV since he really liked my message. First time anyone ever spoke that way to VP. He truly likes me a lot (and vice versa)."

Dork.

Apparently, flattening the curve was important. Keeping Fauci off cable news was the real emergency. The people needed him; the world needs him.

At another point, Fauci admitted privately that the administration's contact tracing strategy was a "f*cking disaster and an abject failure."

Then, almost seamlessly, he noted he had been invited to appear on "Dancing With The Stars."

It's obvious that when the nation's pandemic response is collapsing, your next thought is ballroom choreography.

The celebrity obsession did not end with television.

The diaries feature a cast list worthy of the Oscars. Julia Roberts hosted him on Instagram Live, sent him flowers, and presented him with an award. Vogue editor Anna Wintour, comedian Trevor Noah, NBA star Steph Curry, actors Sean Penn and Matt Damon, rapper Lil Wayne, billionaire Larry Ellison, and numerous media personalities all wandered through Fauci's journal.

CNN's Jake Tapper appears repeatedly through calls, dinners, and text messages. Dana Bash congratulated Fauci after his exchange with Rep. Jim Jordan, even telling him that Wolf Blitzer joked nobody would have blamed him if he had told Jordan to "go f--k yourself."

When journalist Peter Nicholas suggested Fauci had been "humiliated" over a canceled CNN appearance, Fauci's diary recorded his response in two concise words.

"F--- you, Peter."

Apparently, social distancing did not apply to grudges [nor to certain state governors].

The journals also reveal Fauci becoming increasingly irritated with White House officials who threatened to reduce his television appearances. Mark Meadows allegedly argued with him over messaging, while Fauci praised communications director Alyssa Farah for helping restore his media bookings. He described Michael Caputo as "a con man who is completely full of sh-t."

His relationship with President Trump, however, began warmly. Fauci recalled Trump calling him "the smartest person in the world," telling him, "We are counting on you," and appearing "enamored" with him before the relationship later deteriorated after more information came forward.

Perhaps the most unintentionally revealing entries involve Fauci marveling that Secret Service agents no longer bothered checking his credentials because they recognized him. That made him a bit moist.

"Everyone is worried about my health and welfare, probably because it is all over the place that I am almost 80 years old," he wrote.

Some people measure success by lives saved; Fauci measured it by the number of his tv appearances and whether security waves them through the front gate by recognizing him.

The diaries conclude with yet another celebrity cameo. At the 2022 Kennedy Center Honors, Fauci hugged Hunter Biden, who joked the internet "would explode" if someone photographed them together because they were both "being attacked by the far right GOP."

One almost expects the next page to include an acceptance speech thanking his agent, his stylist, and everyone who made his rise from bureaucrat to pandemic superstar possible.

Rand Paul argues the journals reveal a public official more concerned with his personal brand than the crisis facing the country. After months of negotiations broke down, Paul subpoenaed Fauci to testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

"He’s been slow-walking information to us for six months or more," Paul said. "We’ve been negotiating over the date for several months. He agreed, then he said he wouldn’t. So, I think it’s time that we bring him in."

The American people spent the pandemic wondering whether the science was settled.

The diary suggests at least one thing certainly was.

Anthony Fauci never missed an opportunity to check whether the spotlight was still shining on Anthony Fauci.

What a dork!

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Bioethicist of NIH fired, mainly because she's Dr. Fauci's wife slated to decide whether he is ethical

Christine Grady is a bioethicist at the National Institutes of Health. Her job is to analyze ethical issues in healthcare, medicine, and biological research. She also happens to be the wife of Dr. Anthony Fauci and would have been the person who decides whether his behavior regarding his COVID-19 recommendations and personal involvement with China was ethical.

Grady recently lost her position under the leadership of U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. which now signals new priorities with how things are going to get done. 

In the past, Grady supported firing nurses who declined the Covid vaccine, and now she apparently is receiving the same treatment she once supported.

Earlier this week, Grady was included in the mass layoffs at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of RFK Jr.'s more extensive overhaul at the NIH. The point of the layoffs is to move the institute’s focus away from pandemic preparedness and toward more pressing issues. 

She was reportedly offered a reassignment to regional offices of the Indian Health Service, which serves American Indians and Alaska Natives, but declined the opportunity, possibly to raise a public issue with the administration.

An NIH official told the Daily Caller News Foundation that Grady was “a good person with a major conflict of interest.” Gee, ya think?

“One of the problems when the coverup was going on of the Wuhan lab leak, that whole fiasco, was that they were not listening to anyone giving ethics advice,” the anonymous official said. “If they had had someone at the table with knowledge of this, they would have said: ‘Hey, do you want to play it this way, or be more transparent?’ Someone could have raised the question.”

The official stated that Grady was restricted from performing specific duties due to her marriage to Fauci.

Fauci and Grady's combined net worth exceeded $11 million, with an increase of over $7 million since the onset of the pandemic for some strange reason. 

This week’s layoffs impacted at least 10,000 individuals.

"I pour my heart into these posts, and if they’ve sparked something for you, I’d be thrilled if you’d treat me to a coffee over at Buy Me a Coffee – totally optional, of course!"

Tweet

Biden's DHS "likely" violated First Amendment by working with Big Tech to censor election content

" . . . it makes sense, ice cream has no bones."

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

An injunction was ordered Tuesday on the Department of Homeland Security by a federal court after it found that the agency probably violated the First Amendment by coordinating with social media companies to effectively censor "election-related speech."

[H/T Fox News Digital]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals extended the scope of an injunction in place that limits the Biden administration's communication with big tech companies to include the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) within the Department of Homeland Security.

Of course it wasn't Biden himself who did the communicating now that it's obvious communicating isn't one of Joe's strong points--it's likely someone behind the curtain pulling his strings.

According to Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey (R), who is leading the litigation against the Biden administration, CISA is the "nerve center" of the White House's "vast censorship enterprise" and "the very entity that worked with the FBI to silence the Hunter Biden laptop story." 

"CISA was created to protect Americans from foreign attack, and now it has begun targeting its own citizens," Bailey told the outlet.

A three-judge panel determined that CISA was the "primary facilitator" of the FBI's interactions with the social-media platforms and worked in close coordination with the FBI to push the platforms to change their moderation policies to cover "hack-and-leak" content.

The opinion in the order describes CISA’s "switchboarding" operations as "merely relaying flagged social-media posts from state and local election officials to the platforms." But the judge said that "in reality, the practice is ended up being "[s]omething more,'" the order reads.

"CISA used its frequent interactions with social-media platforms to push them to adopt more restrictive policies on censoring election-related speech. And CISA officials affirmatively told the platforms whether the content they had ‘switchboarded’ was true or false," it added.

"Thus, when the platforms acted to censor CISA-switchboarded content, they did not do so independently. Rather, the platforms’ censorship decisions were made under policies that CISA has pressured them into adopting and based on CISA’s determination of the veracity of the flagged information. Thus, CISA likely significantly encouraged the platforms’ content-moderation decisions and thereby violated the First Amendment," the judges said.

Well this is worse than Watergate and J6 combined. 

The injunction stems from a lawsuit brought by Missouri and Louisiana attorneys general against the Biden administration that accused high-ranking government officials of working with giant social media companies "under the guise of combating misinformation" that ultimately led to censoring speech on topics, including Hunter Biden’s laptop, COVID-19 origins and the efficacy of face masks.

If any word in the English language can be used to promote Marxism, that word is "misinformation." Because it's the ones who define what misinformation is, that has the power to shut down dissent.

The attorneys general deposed Dr. Anthony Fauci, and FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan. Federal Judge Terry A. Doughty of the Fifth Circuit ordered the first injunction on July 4th (Independence Day) preventing White House officials and other federal agencies from meeting with tech companies about ways for them to impose "Big Brother" tactics in order to censor social media.

The scathing injunction said the government's actions during the pandemic were akin to "an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth.'"

"If the allegations made by Plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history," the injunction states. "In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the Federal Government, and particularly the Defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment’s right to free speech."

The Justice Department has appealed the court order to the Supreme Court, arguing that the government faced "irreparable harm" because Doughty's order may prevent the federal government from "working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."

But the truth is, the American people would face "irreparable harm" if these leftists had their way.

Tweet

Fauci blasted on social media as a "fraud" and "liar" after mask study indicates that he is

Tony Fauci in his penguin face mask and backup mask beneath it

So the good doctor, Doctor Anthony Fauci, MD went on the Comedy News Network where he was confronted by CNN host Michael Smirconish who showed him a study about the lack of efficacy of face masks in that they made basically no serious difference in the COVID-19 pandemic outcomes. 

Following the broadcast on Saturday, the good doctor, Doctor Anthony Fauci, MD was blasted by conservatives after he acknowledged the study but continued to insist [that is, lie with a Brooklyn accent] that other research shows that at an individual level, face masks help curtail the spread of the COVID.

“When you’re talking about the effect on the epidemic or the pandemic as a whole, the data are less strong,” Doctor Fauci, MD admitted to Smerconish.

“But there are other studies, Michael, that show at an individual level, for individuals,” they might be protective, he said, not citing any of those "other studies." 

A Mask for Every Occasion: "GO, Skins!"

Doctor Fauci also claimed that “we’re not talking about forcing anybody to do anything,” but the only people who might believe that this is the way it's going to go in the future are the same people that believe the Maui fire was started by aliens from the planet LGBTQ12649x.

Libertarian and Medical Doctor Senator Ran Paul (R-KY) who has been a Fauci foe for years said on X, formerly Twitter, “Fauci admits that masks don’t work for the public at large but still absurdly claims masks work on an individual basis. More subterfuge.” 

Doctor Fauci, MD, had previously said that he didn't impose any mask mandates in spite of what the left did in Democrat-run states during the Covid pandemic. Unless you were Nancy Pelosi, Gretchen Whitmer, Bill DiBlasio, or Gavin Newsom, you couldn't go to public places without a cloth mask, regardless of its quality, or even be permitted to eat in restaurants such as The French Laundry.

Uses Chlorox Wipes at every red light

“Holy s***t @cnn just directly confronted Dr. Fauci on air with bullet proof scientific evidence that masks don’t work at all. It only took three years, but finally!” Outkick host Clay Travis X'd.

“This is amazing. According to Fauci, masks work at the individual level but not on the pandemic level. Makes sense,” TRIGGERnometry podcast co-host Konstantin Kisin.

“Wow Fauci is SMOKED on masks and he has zero comeback,” conservative host Liz Wheeler wrote.

“Fauci confronted with most definitive data analysis possible that masks make ZERO difference against Covid. Not a little, not slight- Zero. And he just mutters some numerical illiteracy bulls–t about ‘individual protection.’ He’s a fraud and a liar,”  Buck Sexton, a conservative podcaster said.

Fauci, who is two years older than President Biden, stepped down from his Trump-appointed post as chief medical adviser to the president and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, last year.

When the China virus first struck, Doctor Fauci, MD, lied and said that masks don't provide the type of protection "people thin it is," and later admitted he lied due to the shortage of masks that were needed by health care providers. Once mask production ramped up, Doctor Fauci, MD, started to endorse masking to stem the flow of democracy and admitted he was a liar.

Conservatives were angry but like the late Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) he refused to say that he regretted his lying words.

“I don’t regret anything I said then because in the context of the time in which I said it, it was correct. We were told in our task force meetings that we have a serious problem with the lack of PPEs and masks for the health providers who are putting themselves in harm’s way every day to take care of sick people,” Fauci told CBS News about his reversal on masking at the time.

There has been a sharp uptick in COVID-19 cases nationally over recent weeks due to the approaching campaigning season. You will likely see an increase in people driving alone in their cars wearing masks, not to prevent infection, but to make the statement: "I am woke, hear me virtue signal."

Tweet

Coronavirus subcommittee releases damning email about what Fauci ("Da Science") knew and when he knew it

Dr. Anthony "Da Science" Fauci is a self-serving scumwafer and the House select subcommittee has demonstrated this after it released a damning email through its Twitter account on Thursday evening.

The email shows that Fauci, the former White House coronavirus advisor and National Institute of Health director, knew that the Wuhan lab was doing gain of function research, and he clearly says so in his own words.

🚨BREAKING🚨

New emails reveal that Dr. Fauci was aware of risky gain-of-function research occurring in Wuhan, China prior to the emergence of COVID-19.

Why didn’t he tell the American people?@COVIDSelect is demanding answers👇 pic.twitter.com/pvxtaCRB5s

— Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic (@COVIDSelect) July 13, 2023

You can read Fauci’s email below:

Letter from Dr. Anthony Fauci after conference call. (Credit: House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic)

The letter is dated February 1, 2020, in which Fauci discusses a meeting held by the White House task force he attended regarding the origins of the virus. He wrote that the scientists there were concerned about a paper by an Indian research group suggesting “that there were mutations in the virus that would be most unusual to have evolved naturally in the bats and that there was a suspicion that this mutation was intentionally inserted.”

The worries were exacerbated by the fact that scientists in Wuhan University (GO, FIGHTIN'  FORTUNE COOKIES!) were known to be working on gain-of-function experiments to determine the molecular mechanisms with bat viruses adapting to human infection, and the outbreak that began in Wuhan, China.

The subcommittee also sent a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, which demanded his department answer about the summary email, and documentation on the conference call that is mentioned in Fauci's email.

According to a separate U.S. government official with knowledge of the conference call, the Department [HHS] or one of its sub-agencies are in possession of contemporaneous notes from the conference call.

The Subcommittee informs Becerra that, as part of its investigation “into the origins of the COVID-19,” they request documents and other information to be turned over “no later than July 27, 2023”.

So we wait with baited breath to see if more dirt on Fauci exists and try to guess how the Biden administration will tap dance around it like a bag of cocaine at a Mexican Hat Dance festival.

Tweet

Dr. Fauci still useless after all these years: refuses all blame for his pandemic remedies

THE SCIENCE

Dr. Tony "The Science" Fauci, the former director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Trump appointed pandemic guru, rapped in an interview this week. He put down that "whitey and the rest of you clowns" need to "step down" and quit aiming "finger guns" at him because it's "time to end the blame game 'bout the Covid thing."

Comedy News Network's devout anti-Zionist Christiane Amanpour asked The Science what he thinks he and his science community screwed up or "got wrong" with the useless policies they implemented and demanded the public obey under penalty of death.

“What are the real takeaways, the real lessons for public health?” she queried Doctor Science.

“I think we have to get away from the blame game because so many of the things that you have mentioned were unknowns at the time,” Fauci responded. “It’s so easy.”

Except that at the time, he made it sound as if he knew so many of the things he now says he didn't know.

“This is really big time Monday morning quarterbacking here, which is what it is,” he now claims. “So, rather than have a blame game, and that’s one of the things that we have to stay away from because there were things that happened and it was a moving target and there were things that you did not know at the time and you had to, out of necessity, make a decision.”

Sorry "Science," you don't get to walk away from your mess and say you didn't make it.

TRANSCRIPT:

CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: You know, there were many instances, and we could play many and repeat many, you’re obviously very familiar, but, you know, the fisticuffs with people in Congress, presidential candidates, senators, governors, DeSantis, you know, and other people who just basically blamed you. They basically blamed you. They said everything you did was contrary to saving lives. As if you were in full charge.

So, I realize you’re going to say, well, no, I wasn’t in full charge. But I want to know what you think you and the community got wrong. Was the closing of the schools too draconian? How much of a delay did the fact that nobody fully understood the asymptomatic spread of this, nobody figured out that it could actually bus through certain vaccine levels as well?

THE SCIENCE: Yes, yes.

AMANPOUR: What are the real takeaways, the real lessons for public health?

THE SCIENCE: Yes. I think we have to get away from the blame game because so many of the things that you have mentioned were unknowns at the time. It’s so easy, and I made that comment in my response to one of the questions that Davis Wallace-Wells asked me in the —

AMANPOUR: This is in “The New York Times” profile.

THE SCIENCE: In the “The New York Times” profile. And I didn’t mean it as an affront to him, but I said, you know, this is really big time Monday morning quarterbacking here, which is what it is. So, rather than have a blame game, and that’s one of the things that we have to stay away from because there were things that happened and it was a moving target and there were things that you did not know at the time and you had to, out of necessity, make a decision.

And sometimes the decision was partially right. For example, let me give you an example of a partially right decision. I think the idea, when you having trucks, that were cooler trucks, pulling up to hospitals in order to put bodies in because the morgues were overflowing and the hospital beds were being challenged that you had a triage, you had to shut down. I don’t think anybody who has any realistic evaluation knows that you’ve got to do something dramatic.

Once that’s done, then the thing that you need to now go back and analyze, I don’t think anyone would argue with the fact that you had to shut down, is how long you keep the shut down and how complete it is, how does that relate to schools when you shut down schools, if you do. And I have been very vocal about this and I think that people who like to point fingers, I say, go look and look at the tape. You know, the tale of the tape, when I kept on saying over and over again, we’ve got to get the children back to school as quickly as possible. We’ve got to get them in school safely and we’ve got to make sure that they are not essentially out of school, at home, getting it over the negative consequences.

Different parts of the country interpreted that differently. There were schools that stayed closed far too long and longer than they should have and there were those that essentially didn’t close at all. You know, my daughter is a school teacher in New Orleans, they closed out for two weeks, and we’re essentially open for the rest of the time and other schools —

AMANPOUR: The result was?

THE SCIENCE: And the result was, you know, they didn’t do too badly. I mean, the kids got infected, a lot of them did, you know, virtually. It was very difficult to determine, and say, well, if you shut down this long, you get no negative effect on the child and minimum effect on the infection, those studies weren’t done. It was just trying to do as best as you can in these circumstances that you are in.

So there you have it. You can easily see how Amanpour's questioning failed to seriously challenge Fauci and instead, her questions sounded more like a "blame game" against the GOP, and Gov. DeSantis in particular. She also implied that Fauci wasn't fully in charge, but at the time, when he labeled himself "The Science," when the world was scared of dying, Fauci was in charge and acted like it. And now he still refuses to take any responsibility for his incompetence.

Remember when he said, [and I paraphrase] that people who did not listen to his wisdom were not following "the science." Now he admits he knew as much about what to do in regarding the pandemic as barbers knew when they were performing surgery in the 19th Century.

CNN remains as competent reporting the news as President Biden is piloting an F-35.

Tweet

House committee has Fauci's number re: COVID lab leak theory: pushed drafting publication to 'disprove' lab leak theory

The GOP on the House Coronavirus Pandemic Select Subcommittee said on Sunday that there exists evidence that strongly suggests Dr. Anthony Fauci "prompted" the drafting of a scientific paper to "disprove" the theory that COVID-19 came from a China lab leak and not a wet market.

"The evidence available to the Select Subcommittee suggests that Dr. Anthony Fauci 'prompted' Dr. Kristian Andersen, Professor, Scripps Research (Scripps), to write Proximal Origin and that the goal was to 'disprove' any lab leak theory," the report states in regarding the March 2020 paper titled "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2."  

Proximal in this context refers to the center area in which the coronavirus originated, i.e., the location of its point of origin.

The paper concluded that evidence points to the notion  COVID "is not a purposefully manipulated virus" and the study's authors said they "do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible."

Which is now believed by most virologists to be a load of bull crap. Most agree that it came from a lab, if not the Wuhan Lab, from where it most probably did originate.

The paper was edited and approved by Fauci before it was even published, the subcommittee stated. It went on to become one of the most-read scientific works ever, and Fauci had the balls to cite if from the White House to quash any doubts that the lab leak concerns were bogus, much like his credibility.

We have been lied to by those in power and it looks like the public is catching on to their lies.

Tweet

Rand Paul warns Fauci that his resignation won't protect him

As many readers know, the very reverend and exalted Dr. Anthony Fauci is resigning from his myriad government jobs after his incredible screwup of the pandemic and lying to Congress about his involvement with gain of function experiments and the Wuhan lab. He is supposedly leaving in December and will quite likely work for the Compromised News Network or MNSBC,

Meanwhile, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said on Monday that although Pope Tony will step down in a few months, he promises that this quack will testify before Congress.

“Fauci’s resignation will not prevent a full-throated investigation into the origins of the pandemic,” Paul said in a Monday morning tweet of the Brooklyn-born narcissist who calls himself "science." Paul and Fauci have gone toe-to-toe during congressional hearings, where Paul has stated facts about Fauci's involvement with China, and where Fauci denied this and used ad hominem attacks against Paul because that's what people do who have no real argument.

“He will be asked to testify under oath regarding any discussions he participated in concerning the lab leak,” Senator Paul said.

Fauci stated on Monday that he will be stepping down as so-called President Joe Biden’s top medical adviser and the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases later this year, but unfortunately, he isn't retiring in spite of his old age of 81.

“I will be leaving these positions in December of this year to pursue the next chapter of my career,” threatened Fauci, a total failure at the NIAID. His directives were all over the place from day-to-day: wear a mask, don't wear a mask, wear two masks, wear three masks, mask toddlers, close the schools, pull my finger. Americans were finally seeing through his facade and were disgusted with the lockdowns, the ineffectiveness of the "vaccines" which did not prevent COVID-19, even for pope Fauci.

Fauci emphasized that he is “not retiring,” promising to use his [lack of] knowledge to “advance science and public health.” Yeah, like he did in the pandemic.

In any case, Paul has repeatedly promised to investigate this charlatan, warning that “there will absolutely be consequences for the people who are flouting the law.”

“He just wants you to listen to his authority,” Paul said of Fauci, to the Daily Signal last November. “He has the authority. He wants people to listen and not question him, but that’s sort of a recipe for authoritarianism, so I greatly object to him.”

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Fauci is to medicine as Hillary Clinton is to women. They know the words to use but only have negative effects when the rubber meets the road.

Tweet

Texas ENT Doctor accused of spreading 'misinformation' and suspended, sues the hospital

Houston, Texas ear, nose and throat specialist Dr. Mary Bowden, runs a private practice and announced Monday that she is suiting Houston Methodist Hospital after they accused her of spreading "misinformation" about COVID-19, FOX 26 Houston reported.

Who does she think she is anyway--Anthony Fauci or the CDC?

Her lawsuit seeks data from the hospital detailing the effects of the vaccines and financial reports.

Dr. Bowden held provisional privileges at Houston Methodist prior to she resigned in mid-November of last year after a public dispute with the hospital.

Houston Methodist Hospital posted a series of tweets in November that Bowden had been using her social media to express political opinions about the COVID-19 vaccine and treatments, the FOX 26 reports. The hospital powers that be accused her of "spreading dangerous misinformation which is not based in science" [aka Dr. Fauci].

Bowden said, "Vaccine mandates are wrong" and highlighted her attempts to prescribe patients Ivermectin, a controversial drug hailed as a coronavirus treatment option by some, but apparently shows some efficacy as witnessed by Joe Rogan's recovery and perhaps those of myriad Indians.

Methodist hospital said Bowden had never admitted a patient at the hospital.

Bowden held a press conference in November and said the way Methodist hospital handled the situation led to her name being "vilified" and people calling her "the sister of the devil." She said her focus was on treating the unvaccinated and she wanted to "eliminate the mandates" and let "people have a choice."

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

How horrible is that--people actually having a choice as if it's their body and choice and not Big Pharma's.

Don't be surprised gentle reader, to discover, perhaps years from now, that those who touted the vaccines and boosters, and more boosters, had lined their pockets with incredible wealth of insatiable proportion.

Tweet

Since Obama bash Matha's Vineyard has most COVID cases since April

The bad news: since Barack Obama's birthday bash, the town of Martha's Vineyard has seen more coronavirus cases since April. The good news: Obama is a Democrat so nobody cares nor will the legacy media report on it, therefore it's no big deal.

Obama's party had to be reduced from over 500 "friends" to a little less due to concerns over COVID-19. In fact, the Obama party was so concerned and preoccupied about the virus, that the guests "forgot" to wear masks. But never one to encourage bad behavior in others, Obama ordered his guests to not post photos of the party because it might send the message that masks are only for the "non sophisticated" peons who don't have the same freedoms and his special guests, many of whom flew in on their private carbon-belching jets [think John Kerry] to celebrate the birth of a man who divided our nation by skin color and political party.

The birdcage liner known as The New York Times called the event safe, certainly not a super spreader due to its "sophisticated, vaccinated" crowd. 

Writer Caleb Howe posted this:

The hundreds of maskless people at Obama’s birthday party don’t have to worry about covid because they are a “sophisticated, vaccinated,” crowd per @cnn expert. I’m so glad covid can tell if a crowd is sophisticated. pic.twitter.com/GxnMqMAEPH

So, as long as you are part of the sophisticated crowd, "experts" believe you don't need to give up your freedom to the government. And the "sophisticated crowd" includes all Left-wing demonstrators, Democratic governors and mayors, antifa rioters, BLM Marxists, and the cowardly Texas Democrats who fled the state. 

Somehow the virus is progressive enough to lay off those people so they can go about their business or attend Obama's 60th birthday party. Unfortunately, Pope Fauci couldn't make it, I believe.

But the "experts" who saw no problem with the gathering, didn't count on the Martha's Vineyard encountering the largest spike in infections in four months, with 74 positive test results in the week since Obama boogied. 

The media remains silent.

Meanwhile, the media is going after Republican Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida claiming that he is killing people, in spite of the FACT that Florida, the second oldest state in the nation, comes in 26 in the country for deaths per capita while New Jersey and New York, Democratic-run states, come in 1st and 2nd respectively according to Statista.

In truth, based on what we know of the vaccine, Obama's party should be of no concern as the attendees were all vaccinated. But it's the blatant hypocrisy that should concern us and the fact that the Biden-Harris-Fauci-Obama-Jarrett-AOC administration would have us be masked up for eternity if we allow it.

Screw you all--we don't trust you and we shouldn't. You don't know what you're doing other than trying to grab more and more power over us and we've had enough of your nonsense.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

Faith in Father Fauci Finally Falls

"Hmm . . . where did I put my mask?"

It may be the end of an error, the American public, especially Republicans, putting trust in Dr. Tony Fauci from Brooklyn. His fan club has been reduced dramatically over the past year, according to a recent Trafalgar Group poll. 

Participants in the poll were asked whether their confidence in Saint Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has increased or decreased over the past year, and of those surveyed, 42.2% said their trust in him "decreased." And of that group, 12.1% said their confidence simply "decreased," but 30.1% said it had "decreased significantly."

 Among science denying Democrats, only 20% said their confidence in Fauci decreased while 32.4% claimed it actually increased proving that the media is manipulating their inchoate brains. 

Republicans distrust in Fauci hit a whopping 66.1% and of these folks, 50.8% said their confidence decreased significantly.

The survey also found that the faith of Fauci in 34.7% of Democrats has remained unchanged, while only 13% of Republicans retained the same opinion of him that they had 12 months ago due to their more superior organic development compared to the Democrats.

Conducted between Sunday and Tuesday, the poll included 1,093 likely voters and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.96 percentage points, which is relatively low, meaning the poll was fairly accurate.

You older folks may recall that Fauci was involved in the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s. He believed at the time that AIDS was an airborne virus and could be transmitted simply by being in close proximity to an infected person. 

A YouGov and Yahoo News COVID-19 Vaccination Survey done earlier in May also found Fauci’s approval ratings falling basically along party lines, with 54% of Democrats claiming they claimed Fauci is doing an “excellent” job and around 25% believing he is doing a “good” job. Remember, these are Democrats and everybody gets a trophy.

By contrast, only 5% of Republicans believe Fauci’s performance has been “excellent,” 12% believe it has been “good,” 19% believe it has been “fair,” and a staggering 55% said he has done a “poor” job and were not viewers of CNN where even Andrew Cuomo was praised even after removing the old folks from New York.

As the poll indicates, increasingly more people have questioned Fauci’s competence as the pandemic has dragged on and he seemingly continues to contradict himself, such as flip-flopping yet again on masks earlier this week. 

It shouldn't surprise anyone to learn that Fauci's missing mask was found in his nether regions where his head is often located.

[H/T Daily Wire]

 where more than half of the city identifies as Black, Latino, AAPI, or Native American.”

“Diversity and inclusion is imperative across all institutions including media. In order to progress we must change,” she continued. “This is exactly why I’m being intentional about prioritizing media requests from POC reporters on the occasion of the two-year anniversary of my inauguration as mayor of this great city.”

Critics blasted Lightfoot’s decisio from all sides Wednesday. Beyond the journalists who noted that they were shut out by the policy limiting interviews, Lightfoot faced criticism from a Latino news organization, which refused to interview the mayor after she refused to lift the moratorium on white journalists, per Fox News.

She also faced blowback on Twitter, where racial justice advocates suggested that Lightfoot was likely using the policy to distract from her inability to handle questions of violence. “Lori Lightfoot presided over an enormous increase in homicides, almost all of them in African American or Latino communities, and she’s hoping these PR stunts get liberal America to give her a pass for failing to save people’s lives,” journalist Zaid Jilani pointed out.

Indeed, on the same day that the mayor’s office announced the policy favoring “black and brown” reporters, Lightfoot aides announced that “a compromise plan to make past police disciplinary records available to the public,” essentially turning down a request from Chicago’s racial justice activists to expand police transparency.

  You haven’t highlighted anything yet

When you select text while you’re reading, it'll appear here.

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Determines Who Interviews Her Based On Race, Local Reporters Claim
By
Ryan Saavedra
The Daily Wire
3 min
View Original




Local media reporters in Chicago are alleging that Democrat Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot is selecting who gets to do one-on-one interviews with her based on the race of the interviewer.

NBC 5 political reporter Mary Ann Ahern made the initial allegation on Twitter, writing: “As ⁦ @chicagosmayor ⁩ reaches her two year midway point as mayor, her spokeswoman says Lightfoot is granting 1 on 1 interviews – only to Black or Brown journalists.”

Chicago PBS news anchor Paris Schultz responded: “I was told the same thing.”


I was told the same thing.

— Paris Schutz (@paschutz)

Chicago PBS political reporter said that she could “confirm” what Ahern was alleging.


I can confirm, alderman

— Heather Cherone (@HeatherCherone) May 18, 2021

Lightfoot’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Daily Wire or Fox News.

Australian political commentator Rita Panahi responded to the allegations by writing on Twitter: “More ‘anti-racist’ racism. Almost amusing how regressive race-obsession is celebrated among the Left.”


More "anti-racist" racism. Almost amusing how regressive race-obsession is celebrated among the Left. https://t.co/VtzpQyfklg

— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) May 19, 2021

“Racism in the name of wokeism is still racism,” another commentator said. Another added, “So wouldn’t that make her a racist?”

Progressive writer Zaid Jilani wrote: “Is she going to do some kinda DNA test to assure she upholds this rule?”


Is she going to do some kinda DNA test to assure she upholds this rule? https://t.co/9d7rXZTnCV

— Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) May 19, 2021

“It is unclear when such a practice was enacted and if it only applies to local reporters, particularly after her MSNBC appearance with Stephanie Ruhle on Monday,” Fox News reported. “During her MSNBC interview, Lightfoot told Ruhle she would ‘encourage’ Chicago residents to continue wearing masks despite the new CDC guidance allowing those with the coronavirus vaccine to go without them.”

“I know for me personally, I’m going to continue to wear a mask in public and I’m going to encourage others to do so,” Lightfoot told Ruhle. “We’ve got to make sure that people are continuing to follow the public health guidance that has gotten us this far, and masks, I think, are a big and important part of that.”

Lightfoot said on Tuesday afternoon that her decision to continue to encourage people to wear masks was not based on distrust of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

“But I think their guidance last week regarding masks has people confused…We need clarification,” Lightfoot said. “We still have a long way to go to hit the critical mass (of vaccinations) or herd immunity. I don’t want people to have false confidence.”

“To say, ‘If you’re vaccinated, you don’t have to wear a mask,’ that’s great. But what about all of the other people who are out there that aren’t vaccinated?” Lightfoot added. “There’s no way to know that. So I think for the time being, most people are gonna continue to wear masks outside of their homes.”

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Determines Who Interviews Her Based On Race, Local Reporters Claim

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet