Just Another Video Catalyst

Fox News reports of an Iraqi Shi'ite cleric, Nassir al-Saedi who warned the US military advisers heading for their beautiful and bountiful country that "We will be ready for you if you are back." This peaceful man of the cloth referred to the US as "occupiers" and he plans to engage us militarily if we set foot on his lush, verdant nation.

On Thursday, "President" Barack Hussein Obama of the United States of America, TelePrompted that he is prepared to send 300 special troops into the sweet-smelling and fertile war-torn land, but this religious cleric, a man of Allah, gave the warning during "religious" Friday services (when such prayers about hating Jews, Christians, and everyone else that isn't a Shi'ite Muslim abound).

IRS's Koskinen Holds a Clinic on Arrogance

John Koskinen, the new arrogant leader of the IRS (Irritating Ridiculous Scumsuckers) was grilled in a congressional hearing today. The result of the grilling was a shouting match that sounded more like a Mexican cock fight than a group of gentlemen trying to get to the bottom of the controversy of how the scumsuckers lost thousands of emails that would have likely put Lois Lerner behind bars. As of this writing, Ms. Lerner still walks amongst us and is receiving her salary in full. Not a bad gig.

Paul Ryan (R-Wis) sparred with Koskinen, "This is unbelievable," he said. "That's your problem, nobody believes you."

Koskinen responded, "I have a long career; that's the first time anyone's said I don't believe you."

Ryan shot back, "I don't believe you."

When asked by the House Ways and Means Committee to apologize, the bald-headed stooge said that he didn't feel he had to apologize for the agency that takes our money and squanders it on idiotic "training videos," expects us to have years of our own records intact, and then loses the only ones that are relevant in the case against Lois Lerner. That, boys and girls, is arrogance.

"I don't think an apology is owed," Koskinen said. "We haven't lost an email since the start of this investigation."

Well lah dee dah. The problem isn't that the IRS hasn't lost emails since the investigation; the problem is they "lost" the emails that are the only ones that are important to the investigation. Oh, and then you destroyed the hard drive. That is so unbelievable as to be ludicrous.

It is likely that those emails are still available in the cyber world. They are probably on a server and certainly they have to be on the recipients' servers. I say check the White House server and see what's what. 

Tweet

Banning the Reds***s and Other Offensive Things Like the Koran

We need to ban everything that offends a significant number of people in our society. In fact, I believe liberal colleges across the country should offer courses in Offense Theory so that we can learn just how angry we should be over offensive books, titles, ideas, words, etc., etc.

We have banned the "N" word and a whole host of homophobic words and slurs. Why not ban the Koran, the Islamic book allegedly written by Allah with the help of Mohammed who needed the help of a scribe because the prophet of Islam was illiterate and a pedophile? But that's not what this post is about this time.

If we're to ban a team name of Redskins, I think we need to ban books that are clearly anti-Christian and anti-Semitic; specifically, the Koran.

The Koran can be thought of as two books, the early book when Mohammed was in Mecca, and the later or last book, when Mohammed's army had grown from a few hundred to about ten thousand, and this was when he and his troops were in Medina. The chapters, or suras, are not listed chronologically but in terms of length, so sura number 2, for example, actually came during the Medina period when Mohammed was cutting off heads and such. This should sound familiar to anyone who pays attention to world events in Iraq of late.

So, speaking of the Jews, the Koran says: "And they say: Our hearts are covered. Nay. Allah has cursed them on account of their unbelief, so little it is that they believe." (2:88) The "them" being referred to are the Jews. But there's more.

2:98 "Whoever is the enemy of Allah and His angels and His apostles and Jibreel and Meekaeel, so surely Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers."

But I find it offensive for any religion to refute the legitimacy of another religion, but alas, Islam does it: "Ibrahim was not a Jew nor a Christian but he was (an) upright (man), a Muslim, and he was not one of the polytheists." 3:67. As you may know, Ibrahim was Abraham and was born several thousand years before Islam became a religion. And Abe was a Jew--I know, I was invited to his bar mitzvah.

One of my all-time favorite suras is 5:51 "O you who believe! do not take Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other, and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people."

And I am very offended by the Koran where it claims that Muslims gave the Jews their holy scripture, the Torah (2:65), and gave Mary, the mother of Jesus, "Clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the holy spirit" (2:87). First of all, I find it very offensive the Koran did not capitalize "him" when referring to Jesus, like they capitalize "Him" when they refer to Allah. I also find it offensive that Islam takes credit for both the Jews and Christians while actually screwing up time lines of history and changing Judeo-Christian scripture.

"Taste ye Jews, the punishment of burning" (3:18). How sweet the holy Koran and how tolerant. Is it any wonder at all why Islam targets Jews and Christians? Is it any wonder why the Palestinians want to destroy Israel, their "Little Satan" and then destroy us, the "Big Satan?" The hatred is in the Koran and I think we Christians and Jews need to take a stand and get it banned. In fact, that might work as a slogan: "Take a stand and get it banned!"

Tweet:

Coincidences and Coverups

Ahmed Abu Khatalla is captured after 2 years since his involvement with the Benghazi 911 attack that killed our ambassador and 3 Americans. Hillary Clinton gets interviewed by Fox News Network practically at the same time we learn of this. Coincidence?

The IRS loses 2 years of emails that would have clarified the involvement of Lois Lerner and perhaps Barack Obama in the scandal that targeted conservative groups, keeping them from obtaining their tax exempt status. Then 6 more IRS officials had "the dog eat their emails."  Another coincidence?

Obama trades 5 Taliban terrorists for a lowly Army deserter. This happens at the same time when he is planning to close the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility. Now there's talk of him releasing scores more of these dangerous thugs. Yet another coincidence?

We had the Fast and Furious scandal, Benghazi, Bergdahl, Solyndra, the IRS, AP, NSA, James Rosen, and the New Black Panthers voting suppression scandal, lest we forget. One administration, so many "phony scandals." 

We have to ask ourselves the question: what are the chances we will ever get the hard evidence, the communications, emails and the like, about these scandals? Probably about as much chance as catching Jay Carney being totally truthful about Obama.

According to the Associated Press, the Obama administration last year cited "national security" 8,496 times to withhold information requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This is a 57% increase from the previous year. In fact, 36% of FOIA requests made in 2013 were either censored or denied, and in 196,034 other occasions, the "dog ate the homework" excuse was used--that is, they simply could not find the records requested.

So "the most transparent administration ever" is exactly the opposite of that claim. It should give you pause to wonder what other lies have they told, and what are they not telling us.






Tweet

It Only Took 642 Days to Get Him

It took a mere 642 days but the US has finally captured a prime suspect in the 911 attack in Benghazi that took the life of Ambassador Chris Stevens, and 3 other brave Americans. The terrorist is currently on his way to America via ship.

Ahmed Abu Khattala was captured on Sunday near Benghazi, and quite possibly just a few blocks away sipping a slurpee in public, and possibly doing another media interview about his amazing Benghazi adventure.

Ahmed (no relation to Ahmed the Terrorist of Jeff Dunham fame) is a commander of Ansar al-Sharia, the terrorist organization that orchestrated the Benghazi attack on the facility that was being used by the USA for reasons still unknown to those of us who funded it.

Upon his arrival to the USA, Khattala will be treated as a common criminal, not as a terrorist, and will probably be read his Miranda rights, given a brand new Koran and a prayer rug, along with three hots and a cot. He will not be treated as if he killed four Americans in a terrorist attack, and will have the right to remain silent. Khattala, in other words, will be treated as if he simply knocked over a gas station and had an accomplice who killed the attendant.

A small special forces team along with an FBI agent captured Khattala (possibly at an outdoor cafe signing autographs "for the kids" who love his work). He was taken by surprise and wondered if CNN turned him in.

"President" Obama said of the capture that it is a "message to the world" about what happens when Americans are attacked. He did not say: "over a video." He also did not say: "When an American is attacked, be assured that we will give you two, maybe three or ten years and then come after you, just when you think it is safe to appear on "America's Got Talent." And when we catch you, it is at that time when you will be read your Miranda rights and enjoy all the comforts of prison."

Thankfully, nobody was injured in the operation (whose code name was: 'Midterms'), because based upon how long it took to get this scumbucket,, his pursuers may have pulled a muscle or broken their walkers.

Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio believe this terrorist should be sent to Guantanamo Bay Detention, but you're more likely to see a rabbi as the Saudi King's spiritual advisor before Obama would agree to adding a terrorist to Gitmo.

Tweet

The NY Times: America's Most Red Paper

Chelsea Manning had an Op Ed in the Gray Lady, aka The New York Times. You should remember Chelsea as Bradley Manning, but he has since changed his name to fit his self-image of a woman trapped inside a traitor's body.  It seems fitting that someone like Chelsea would write for America's most red paper.

Back in 1996, The New York Times did an obituary piece on another American traitor, Alger Hiss, who died all too soon at the age of 92. The evidence of Hiss's guilt was overwhelming but the paper referred to Alger Hiss as: " . . . the erudite diplomat and Harvard trained government lawyer who was convicted of perjury in an espionage case that became one of the great riddles of the Cold War . . . " in an article by Janny Scott. 

But columnist, George Will said that Hiss's claim to innocence up to the time of his death had become "one of the long-running lies of modern American history." I tend to believe Will and those who testified against Hiss who had no ax to grind.

It seems that the Times always goes out of its way to defend or glorify those who hate America. 

Back to Miss Manning. on August 21, 2013 the editorial board wrote that they believe the 35 year sentence Chelsea received was too severe (see New York Times ).

"He had previously pleaded guilty to lesser versions of those [Espionage Act] crimes that exposed him to 20 years behind bars. For a defense lawyer, a sentence of one-third the potential maximum [90 years] is usually not a bad outcome. But from where we sit, it is still too much, given his stated desire not to betray his country but to encourage debate on American aims and shed light on the "day to day" realities of the American war effort."

So Chelsea gave over 700,000 classified government documents to Wikileaks, the largest cache of secret material ever made public in American history for all our enemies to see, He broke the law, betrayed his oath as a military intelligence analyst, helped the enemies of the United States with information, and The New York Times thinks 35 years is "too long by any standard." 

No, 35 years is too long by The New York Times' standard because they believe Manning's intentions supersede his behavior. That makes as much sense as a drunk driver claiming he didn't mean to jump the curb and kill those people.

Mad Magazine once made light of the Times with a masthead that read: "For all the news that fits we print," a take-off on their actual slogan. The trouble is, that is no longer true of the Times, and most of the mainstream media. They often do not print what they don't want you to read. You have to get your real news from the blogs and a few conservative news outlets.

Tweet

ISIS in Iraq as Heads Roll

Today it's Iraq, tomorrow it's Syria, if ISIS has its way. Then perhaps it will be Turkey until they can get to the final solution and finish off Israel and kill all the Jews. It isn't that they personally know any Jews who they hate, it's just that their "holy" book tells them it's the right thing to do. Of course, they don't have many nice things to say about Christians either, but they have their priorities.

President Barack Hussein Obama has no immediate plans to deal with this world crisis, but perhaps he'll take a poll and see what the public thinks he should do before he makes up his mind. In the meanwhile, he has some rounds of golf to play and there's nothing more important than that for him.

With ISIS planning to march into Baghdad, however, Obama is feeling a wee bit of pressure to do something politically expedient so he'll get back to us on that, after he speaks to his foreign advisers, he advised us. He speaks as if he's still learning what his role is as president, and keeping us abreast of it.

So here's what's going on in the Middle East as I write this.

First of all, the Shi'ites hate the Sunnis even though both groups are Muslims and they hate each other for religious reasons. Go figure. So they fight and kill each other for sport and consider the other group to be infidels. who have polluted Islam. If only they could learn to lovingly co-exist, to compromise, then they could fight the real infidels of the world: everyone else.

Iraq is a Shi-ite majority nation, with only 20% Sunni. The Shi'ites currently control the government and would like to rid themselves completely of Sunni influence. Iraq has already done a bang up job of getting rid of the Christians and an even better job of ridding the nation of Jews, most of whom are dead or fled.

But the word on the sand is that ISIS has its eyes set on Kashmir and would like to "free" it from India so that they can join the world jihad hate-fest. Not every Indian in Kashmir thinks this is a bad idea.

Meanwhile, there are Iraqi heads lining the roads near Tikrit and Mosul and more death and destruction is in the forecast as Obama is considering his options. Imagine if he planned things in advance.

Tweet

Insecurity and Our Borders

The US border is as effective at keeping illegal aliens out of the country as the VA is at expediting treatment for our veterans.

We have become a dumping ground for people who are looking for free stuff from our government, and a country that will care and educate their children on our dime. Where illegal aliens become recipients of US tax dollars, Democrats will become recipients of their votes--it's a win-win for both groups.

 Now I sincerely feel empathy for the thousands upon thousands of children who have been sent here with the assurances that they will not be sent back to their home country, but it doesn't seem fair to those immigrants who have come here legally, gone through the application process, and became citizens.`

The Democrats and some RINOs say it's time for immigration reform while conservatives say that we need to secure our borders first and foremost. The Democrats said that our borders are secure. They lied like Jay Carney on steroids.

The administration, as is typical of them, is defying the First Amendment by not allowing the press to photograph or interview the kids. I guess they didn't want the public to photograph Obama on our side of the border with a checker flag as they came across in droves.

There are scant bathrooms, no showers, and many of the children are sick, but they come here because Obama has given them the signal that it's okay.

It isn't as if we have unlimited resources for these new arrivals. In 2012 about 251 thousand children went into foster care and the total number in the system that year was 400 thousand. It's outrageous to think we can continue along this line of human influx and serve the children effectively. Amnesty doesn't serve the children it serves the Democrats.

It isn't a humanitarian crisis we have here, it's a political ploy.

Tweet