Nicholas Sandmann's family goes up against the media after he was dragged through the mud

The parents of Nicholas Sandmann, the 16-year-old Covington Catholic high school student, hired a heavy-weight attorney who specializes in litigating against media organizations for libel and slander, which is exactly what the media did to this kid.

WCPO reported that the Sandmann family has hired L. Lin Wood, whom disgraced and scummy former journalist Dan Rather described as the "attorney for the damned." He also said that Wood is known for "aggressive libel and slander suits against media organizations."

The family made the announcement in a statement released by the Hemmer DeFrank Wessels law firm, according to The Enquirer.

The release explained that "...Todd McMurtry, the family’s legal counsel, conducted an extensive search to find a nationally-recognized attorney skilled in the fields of libel, defamation, and the First Amendment." [That's the Amendment liberals think only applies to them.]

"Mr. Wood brings an unrivaled record of success in the courtroom, having represented such clients as the family of JonBenet Ramsey, former Rep. Gary Condit and Richard Jewell in lawsuits against the media," McMurtry said in a statement. "Mr. Wood visited with the family today in northern Kentucky. He is committed to bringing justice to 16-year-old Nick Sandmann and his family. Further announcements should be expected in the next few days."

Sandmann was thrust into national spotlight over the weekend after far-left activists and left-wing journalists spread a selectively edited video clip of an interaction between him and Native American Nathan Phillips. The activists, known as the Black Hebrew Israelites, a designated hate group by the Southern Law Poverty Center, a leftist group themselves, were harassing the high schoolers in front of the Lincoln Memorial when Phillips came along beating on his drum in the face of Sandmann.

Phillips falsely claimed to be a Vietnam veteran, [he did not necessarily come out and say it, but never corrected the media when they made the claim. He was in the USMC during the war but never went there and was a refrigeration mechanic.] He was also AWOL three times [Absent Without Official Leave, aka "over the hill"] and had been busted [demoted] to private. He also has a history in 2015 of lying about being harassed by white people who allegedly attacked his Native American heritage. The guy is such a phony, it wouldn't surprise me if he isn't even Native American--but I digress.

The Daily Wire reported:

The three-minute video was posted online by a group of Native American protesters who claimed they were harassed and intimidated by a group of Covington Catholic High School students waiting for their bus near the Lincoln Memorial. The video is heavily clipped at the beginning and end, and shows only an apparent "confrontation" between a protester named Nathan Phillips and a Make America Great Again-hat wearing teen. ...

Saturday night, a two-hour long, full video of the confrontation became widely available on social media, and that video shows a very different interaction than the one initially portrayed. The video, taken from the point of view of a second group of protesters who witnessed the interaction, shows that Phillips approached the teens — not the other way around, as Phillips claims — and that the teens were relatively peaceful during the incident, laughing and clapping along with Phillips' drumming, and occasionally asking questions like, "what is going on here?"

The Covington Catholic students were verbally attacked by a designated hate group that called them "Child molesting f**gots," "Dirty a*s crackers," "Future school shooters," and "Incest babies."

Rob Sanders, a prosecutor for Kenton County, Kentucky where Covington Catholic High is located, told Fox News' Laura Ingraham on Wednesday night that a criminal investigation against those who threatened the students is "already underway."

Full transcript of Ingraham's interview with Sanders provided [to Daily Wire] via Fox News:

INGRAHAM: Covington Catholic School has reopened but the violent threats against the students have not stopped. In fact, the Covington Diocese received a suspicious package just tonight. We share tweet after tweet with you from celebrities, liberal commentators calling for attacks and even the death of these teenagers. Tonight some hope that this hate speech will not go unpunished.

Joining me now exclusively for his first national television interview, is Rob Sanders. He's a prosecutor for Kenton County, Kentucky where Covington Catholic High is located. Rob, it's good to see you. What kind of charges could realistically be filed and against whom?

ROB SANDERS, KENTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY PROSECUTOR: Well, we have a number of different charges in Kentucky that might apply. The one that jumps out the fastest is terroristic threatening. Now there's three different degrees of terroristic threatening in Kentucky, two of them are felonies.

The most common one, I think that might apply in this situation is terroristic threatening second-degree, that's any time that someone threatens death or violence against a educational institution in Kentucky or any student in the educational institution in connection with the school function.

Now that is a Class D felony. It's one to five years in the state penitentiary. That could rise to five to ten years in a Class C felony if the person threatens that violence or death in connection to an educational institution in it the use of a device of mass destruction or weapon of mass destruction.

INGRAHAM: Yes. Well, you have - this is happening on Twitter though.

SANDERS: --that would double up the--

INGRAHAM: Mr. Sanders, this is happening on Twitter from different states.

SANDERS: Yes, ma'am.

INGRAHAM: --different locations, does that hinder the prosecution? I mean you don't really need an - I mean, you have to interview these people, they're in different states. You're going to have to get to them somehow.

SANDERS: Well, it makes it much more difficult. It makes it much more difficult, much more complicated, #1. There's a number of misdemeanors that could apply in a lot of these cases, but we can't reach across state lines and extradite for misdemeanors--

INGRAHAM: Right.

SANDERS: --which means, we would have to wait for the person to come back to Kentucky or make a stop in Kentucky before we could ever arrest them. But when it comes to the offenses that rise to the felony level, we can extradite.

Now it's not as easy as staying a Twitter handle. We can't reach out and just arrest someone who - half the time they're using a fake name, fake profile picture that sort of thing. We have to go through a process of issuing subpoenas, search warrants, getting--

INGRAHAM: Are you going to do this?

SANDERS: --information that goes with - it's already underway. I've had detectives in and out of my office all day today. We were starting with some comments, some threats that were made in state, because those are people that we don't even have to extradite. And we are moving on then to the ones that are out of state.

We've had the detective that works in my office has already been busy issuing Grand Jury Subpoenas and composing search warrants for detectives at other agencies.

INGRAHAM: Good.

SANDERS: --sending out, so we can get the information associated with the ownership of these accounts.

INGRAHAM: All right.

SANDERS: We get the IP addresses that are registered--

INGRAHAM: You got to get these people.

SANDERS: Then we find out.

INGRAHAM: I mean, it's only - you are only one office--

SANDERS: That's right, we find out who uses the internet, those IP addresses.

INGRAHAM: Yes, we get the IP addresses. We're going to follow-up with you later in the week to find out where you are on this. But--

SANDERS: Yes, ma'am.

INGRAHAM: --this has to happen. Because, until people--

SANDERS: Well, it's going to happen. Everybody's got to realize that these- -

INGRAHAM: --have to got jail. They have to go to jail. That's got to hurt. Otherwise someone is getting hurt and I fear - we're about to talk to Steve Scalise who felt it in a different way. Someone is going to get hurt or someone is going to get killed. Prosecutor, I really appreciate you joining us.

SANDERS: Yes, there is no doubt.

INGRAHAM: And we'll have you back. I know it's a longer segment. We've got a lot of people to talk to, so we appreciate it.

I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Waffle House customer dances naked in parking lot after being asked to leave restaurant

Freedom Ryder Zobrist: winner of the Stormy Daniels'
Older Sister Lookalike Award

She has the perfect name but not so much the perfect way of handling disappointment. Freedom Ryder Zobrist who looks somewhat like Stormy Daniels will probably look like in a few more years, is scheduled to appear in court on February 7th. after she was arrested outside a  Waffle House restaurant in Pensacola, Florida after allegedly taking off her clothes and dancing naked in the parking lot and even exposing herself to employees.

According to authorities, the woman arrived at the restaurant on Monday morning and was asked to leave by the manager due to her unruly behavior.

She returned later and allegedly threatened to shoot the manager and everyone inside the restaurant, Pensacola's WEAR-TV reported.

Zobrist then walked outside and "pulled down her pants" and started dancing around the parking lot," according to the arrest report obtained by the station.

"It was not even funny," said Manny Mocules, an illegal immigrant from Guatamala. "You shoulda seen her ugly body, man. I couldn't even finish my waffle and coffee."

The manager told police that Zobrist tried grabbing his genitals and then licked both sides of his face. One witness said Zobrist was naked in front of his vehicle, according to the report.

"I mean, who she think she is, man? Stormy Freakin' Daniels?" Mocules added.

The suspect was being held in the Escambia County jail on $800 bond and is scheduled to appear in court on Feb. 7. It is alleged that she asked jailers if she could work out her bail in a "different way, if you know what [I] mean."

"Is not funny. Is not funny, man."

Pensacola, Florida is number two in the nation for naked parking lot dancing and stranger genital grabbing, followed only by Hollywood, California.


I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Elizabeth 'Spouting Bull" Warren does an AOC imitation by not knowing her civics [and I don't mean Honda]

Presidential hopeless Sen. Elizabeth Spouting Bull Warren (Dem-Leftist-MA) was on the Comedy News Network's (CNN) with Anderson Cooper on "Anderson Cooper 360" to discuss several issues on Tuesday. Among the issues discussed was the current partial government shutdown.

Cooper asked the faux Native American: "Do you ever think, look, the realistic end game is that Republicans get two thirds of what they want and the Democrats have to settle for the shorter straw? Is that how the balance of power really works?"

Check out time slot starting at 3:25 and watch her unwittingly do an Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex imitation. [If you watch the video from the beginning, make sure your keyboard is completely covered with a vomit-proof cloth.]

"Well, let's talk about the balance of power," Warren responded. "There are two coequal branches of government, the president of the United States and the Congress."

Occasionally Coherent-Cortex said that there are three chambers of government: the president, the House and the Senate. At least she had the correct number of branches. Of course we have the Executive, which is the president; the legislative, which is the House and Senate; and the Judiciary, which is the Supreme Court. If you don't believe me, just ask a third grader or a real lawyer.

The legislative makes the laws; the judicial interprets the laws; and the executive branch, which enforces laws. And these are divided into branches, not chambers.


I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.



Tweet

A Conservative Spinning Class for Media: 3 spinning lessons

The following is satire, so don't sue me.

It's obvious that the liberal media has the conservative media beaten, hands down, with how they spin the news. They never err on the side of the GOP or Trump, and they know how to preface their stories when it's clear they have no evidence or proof of their ridiculous claims. So I'm going to provide several examples of how to spin a story on the side of truth, justice and the American way.

Examples [in quotes] with my comments are below:

1. "What if Chuck Schumer is having an affair with Nancy Pelosi and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is blackmailing them to move even further to the left than they already have moved? I'm not saying for certain that this is true, but rumors are rumors and often speak to the truth. Chuck and Nancy make a perfect couple and you saw how well they go together when they responded to President Trump's address to the nation over the partial government shutdown and border wall controversy."

What can he be saying to make her smile?

Comment: I never said that any of my claims are true--I used a hypothetical approach and cannot be sued for this. The left does this a lot and it's more annoying than a slug crawling around your nether regions. But it works for those who want it to work. Unfortunately, real conservatives more often than not, are not conspiracy theorists, but there are always independents and a few scattered Democrats who might be taken in by this approach.

2. "According to a source who wishes to rema

in anonymous as they are not permitted to speak to the media, Linda Sarsour, Keith Ellison, Andre Carson and Hassan Nasrallah are suspected of planning the assassinations of President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu due to Trump's moving the U.S. embassy to Israel to Jerusalem and thus recognizing it as Israel's capital. Ellison, who was not indicted for the 'alleged' physical, verbal and mental abuse of his partner, was not available for comment. Sarsour, a friend of public anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan told this reporter that jihad was going to get me and the rest of the GOP. Carson and Nasrallah were both unavailable for comment. Due to the status of the Americans involved, no charges have been filed, as was also the case with Hillary Clinton."

Comment: Anonymous sources are like gold. You don't even need to actually dig them up because you can make them up--who's going to know? And if you make the "facts" almost too incredible to believe, but still have even a small possibility of truth, people who will want to believe you will do just that.

3. "According to a recent poll by Brain Flushings, 79 percent of Democrats who voted for Hillary Clinton think she never had a private server and if she did, so what? Among Republicans the numbers are reversed. Fully 82 percent believe she committed a treasonous act and should be put on trial. Independents to the tune of 77 percent think she is not qualified to be a woman and has blood on her hands and stains on her dress."

Comment: Using the trusty 'recent poll' ploy sounds legitimate and factual. Never say where it took place or exactly when. Recent can mean a lot of things, especially considering the age of the earth. Liberals do this all the time and it works on their liberal readers, thus the term "libtard" came into vogue.

I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Avenatti alleged to have kept money from settlements for himself

He may not be the best lawyer in the world--heck, he may be the worst--now Michael Avenatti is being accused of covertly keeping settlement money from one of his clients, spending the money on himself, then telling the client he hasn't received the funds as yet.

The client, Gregory Barela, said that Avenatti “was operating his law firm in a Ponzi scheme like manner.” But let's face it, if you are stupid enough to hire the shyster Avenatti, you're probably going to get sexed in a bad way.

The Daily Beast reported that Barela filed a statement of claims with Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS), a private arbitration organization, arguing that after Avenatti pocketed the money from the settlement, he turned around and offered to lend some of the funds back to Barela with 10% interest.

Seriously?

The claim, which was shown to the media outlet by Barela’s attorney, claims “Avenatti was operating his law firm in a Ponzi scheme like manner, taking settlement proceeds received for clients to pay off debts, pay the other individual Defendants’ salaries and bonuses, and fund his lavish lifestyle, while telling clients that the settlement proceeds had not been received or would be received at a later date.”

Kathy "The Beheader" Griffin and Mickey

The Daily Beast reports that according to the statement from Barela’s attorney, Avenatti and a third party reached a settlement for Barela, but in January 2018 the third party deposited money into an account from which Avenatti would transfer the funds to Barela, and Avenatti later informed Barela the money had never been deposited, prompting months of worry for Barela and repeated queries of Avenatti as to the whereabouts of the money. Eventually, according to Barela, Avenatti made the offer of a loan, but Barela had now decided to hire attorneys who found from the third party that they had already paid Lyin' Loser Avenatti.

Steven Bledsoe, Barela's attorney, told The Daily Beast, “Mr. Barela hired our firm to investigate what happened to the settlement payment that he was supposed to have received early last year. As part of our investigation, we contacted the lawyer for the settling party and he gave us a copy of the unaltered settlement agreement and the wire-transfer confirmation showing that his client made the settlement payment to the bank account specified by Mr. Avenatti five days before it was due.”

Avenatti denied any wrongdoing as is his habit, telling The Daily Beast, “These allegations are completely fabricated, bogus and fraudulent. [Like all of the other allegations made by everyone else against the toad]. We have no idea where this is coming from or why someone would make up this ridiculous false story and deceive his attorneys. Until recently when we demanded to be relieved as counsel, we previously represented Mr. Barela in multiple matters and he has received 100 percent of what he is entitled to. We have never had any contact with Talitha Barela.” Talitha Barela is Gregory Barela’s wife and co-plaintiff.”

Hopefully we will soon learn the truth, and the truth may not set Avenatti free.

Stormy and Mickey

Avenatti is the so-called lawyer representing pornography performer Stormy Daniels [whose real name is Stephanie Clifford] against President Trump. It isn't known whether he had ever planned to represent Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden, but if he did, that would tell you all you need to know about this guy.

I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Nathan Phillips: Chief Spouting Bull

"If your mother says she loves you, verify" -- Columbia School of Journalism

I am a Vietnam war veteran. I am not a Vietnam era veteran because I was stationed in Chu Lai in the U.S. Marine Corps air wing during the war. We flew A4 Skyhawks [some called the little attack jets 'Scooters'] and people out in the jungle were trying to kill us and destroy our jets. Many times they were successful and I was fortunate like most of my buddies. 

In 2010, in his run for Senate, then Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal  lied about serving in Vietnam and he was outed for it.  

For years, Blumenthal often touted his service in "Nam" as a Marine, but it was eventually discovered that not only had the lying sack of dog crap not served in Vietnam, his USMC service was as a Marine Corps Reserve, which, along with college deferments, kept his sorry butt out of Vietnam. Good for him, but he shouldn't have lied about serving in Vietnam--it's what's known as stolen valor.

Then there's Nathan Phillips.

Phillips is the turd who created a controversy over the weekend as he has done before. He and a group of his phony cronies participating in the alleged Indigenous Peoples March walked into the middle of a group of white Catholic high school students wearing MAGA hats who were the target of verbal attack by another protest group known as the Black Hebrew Israelites, a known crazy hate group.

Phillips [aka Chief Spouting Bull] directly approached one of the kids, got in his face, and proceed to bang his tom-tom right in the kid’s face. 

For about two hours, the leftist lunatics and #NeverTrumpers engaged in a slime-fest of hate. 

But the press jumped on the bandwagon after seeing a very brief video showing the kid standing his ground in the MAGA hat and a smile on his face, and then the proverbial crap hit the fan on Twitter, (the Covington High School administration even admonished the kids before knowing the true story) and of course, Kathy "the Beheader" Griffin and others got into the act, some calling for the doxxing of the kids, some for the burning them to death in the school, some for the firing of school staff, and all the rest of the garbage that gets spewed on social media. 

It was a social media lynch mob.

And then there's Phillips. A USMC veteran who claimed to have served as Recon in Nam but instead, never made it there and worked as a refrigeration repairman stateside. But that wasn't a problem to the leftist media who failed to verify his bona fides. 

One such leftist piece of dog pile is the always dependable Slate: “…Nathan Phillips, a Vietnam War veteran…”

But other media outlets that shouldn't surprise you were:

UPI: “…laughing and chanting at Vietnam War veteran Nathan Phillips…

Washington Post*: “…Phillips, an Omaha tribe elder who fought in the Vietnam War…” which has since quietly edited the story but the original clip is seen below:


The Washington Post: “…Phillips, 64,…”

The Omaha World Herald reprinted a profile it ran of Phillips in November 2000: “Now 45, Phillips has been sober for 16 years” . which evidently confirms his age listed in the Post is accurate. There's no way he served in Nam because he would have been born in 1955 and would have been only 16 in 1971 when the Corps was pulling more guys out of Vietnam than placing them there and he would have needed to wait for parental consent to join in 1972, when he claims he joined. 

Junior enlistees were not sent to Nam in the ebbing of the war, but we know now that he never went to war as the media, which he failed to correct, claimed.

Like Richard Blumenthal, Nathan Phillips is a fake, and the media that failed to verify his history totally validates President Trump's statements about them.

I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint.  Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly. 

Tweet

Rep. Idiot Omar attacks Covington students,, faces backlash

Repulsive Ilahn Omar (D-MN) is getting her comeuppance on social media for reflexively attacking the Covington Catholic students even after it was clearly acknowledged that the media got it all wrong. The kids were misrepresented as instigators of racism based on a fragment of a video.

The kids had all the wrong intersectional creds: they are young, white, Catholic men, so naturally, the left, the media, and others who failed to analyze the situation [including the kids' own school and diocese], immediately believed the boys were in the wrong in what appeared, on the surface, to be a situation in which they surrounded a Native American drum-beating elderly man  near the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

Media and Hollywood figures immediately seized on the viral confrontation between the group of students and Native-American elder Nathan Phillips. 

The initial clip that went viral appeared to show students antagonizing Phillips, but additional video then emerged offering context, including that Phillips approached them amid a confrontation between the students and Black Hebrew Israelite protesters, a known black hate group who yelled racial, homophobic and anti-white slurs. 

The students pushed back on the initial criticism that they were the antagonists, and many of those critics have since retracted their statements -- but others have revived the criticism because they are horrible leftists who see their "cause" as justification to ruin the lives of high school kids in MAGA hats. How brave of them.

Omar, an overt anti-Semite who supports the BDS movement [Boycott, Divest and Sanction Israel] weighed in on the subject, responding to President Trump’s tweet defending Covington student Nick Sandmann and his peers.  She falsely claimed they were taunting the black protesters despite video proof and accounts to the contrary, and citing a videotaped comment about rape, though it wasn't any of the Covington students who said it.

Omar faced plenty of criticism for her tweet, with many calling her a “liar.” The explanation for this behavior is that she is a liar.

The newly elected representative was also criticized for a tweet claiming that Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-SC, was “compromised,” admitting later to CNN that it was an “opinion.” Ironically, the claim alludes to old rumors that Graham is gay. But the left is supposed to support gays, not use them as insults.

I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint.  Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly. 

Tweet

Blowback over Covington Catholic 'Blackface' accusation begins

New York's Daily News' ironically used to be known as New York's picture newspaper. Maybe that's because a large number of those who buy it only look at the pictures. But that's the irony--the pictures [as in video] at the Lincoln Memorial of Native American serial liar, Nathan Phillips, clearly show that the boys from Covington Catholic High School, in Kentucky, did not harass him, but it was the other way around. Yet that didn't stop the rag from trying to go after the school in order to somehow justify their lies about the incident.

After the left-leaning media-led smear campaign against the Covington High School boys fell apart with video evidence clearly demonstrating that not only did the boys not target an African American group with "racial epithets" and "harass" Phillips, (it was the boys were actually the ones who were pelted with insults and harassed) the left-wing New York Daily News published another hit-piece on the Catholic school on Monday.

The piece, shamelessly titled "SEE IT: Covington Catholic High students in blackface at past basketball game," begins by saying snarkily, "This won’t help Kentucky student Nick Sandmann’s case." It then shamelessly "reports":

A photo said to be featuring Covington Catholic High School students clad in blackface during a 2015 basketball game made the rounds on Twitter Monday morning amid last week’s Indigenous Peoples March controversy.
The photo depicts several white students, some in blackface, shouting at an opposing black player.
While the photo’s origins couldn't be verified, the official Covington Catholic High School YouTube account published a video last January boasting its basketball school spirit, and several clips, including one from 2012, showcase attendees chanting in black face, a mockery of the opposing players. The school took down the video later on Monday.

It's obvious to anyone with a high school education, or who at least attended one high school or college basketball game, that the idiots at the Daily News have no idea what they're talking about.

Matt Walsh of the Daily Wire summed up the arguments succinctly in an op-ed:

Anyone with, say, a third of a functioning brain rattling around in their skulls will immediately understand the scene. The kids are all wearing black because the fans of sports teams often will come to games all in the same color. Oftentimes fans will wear black as part of a "blackout." Other times they'll white as part of a "whiteout." Or sometimes they'll wear blue or red or any other color. This is standard operating procedure in American sports, especially scholastic sports. 

Why are they screaming at the opposing player? Well, because he is the opposing player and that's what the home fans do and have done in every basketball game or football game ever played anywhere on Earth. Why is the opposing player black? Well, because that just happens to be his race. If he was white, they would be just as unwelcoming. This is part of the pageantry of sports.

The blowback to the leftist Daily News' hit-piece has gone online, including a post from Robert Barnes, the lawyer who repeatedly called out journalists for libeling the Covington teens and is threatening lawsuits on their behalf against any who fail to adequately retract their false reports.

"Fake news. This is a blackout event, not people in blackface. Hence, notice how the kids entire bodies are in black paint or black clothing. I guess NYDN thought it wouldn’t be fair if they didn’t get sued too," wrote Barnes in response to the Daily News tweet.

Let's hope Barnes is serious and drags their butts to court.

"Many independent journalists who lean left agree the kids were falsely attacked, led by one of the best grassroots journalists in the country on these kind of issues," he wrote Tuesday after a series of posts directed as specific reporters. "No media member who refuses to retract at this juncture has any credible defense to libeling these kids."

The problem is that the First Amendment generally protects journalists from being sued. But this is not journalism--that seems to have died a long time ago, even before Trump became president.


I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint.  Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly. 




Tweet