Showing posts with label Nicholas Sandmann. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nicholas Sandmann. Show all posts

Thursday, January 9, 2025

Cretin News Network worried over defamation suit's outcome as trial heats up



Alright, buckle up, because CNN's in for a wild ride, or should I say, a defamation lawsuit rollercoaster! Here's the scoop from Fox News, and trust me, it's juicier than a five-pound burger at a vegan conference.

CNN's bigwigs are sweating bullets over this defamation case that's hotter than a summer day in Phoenix. They're not just worried about losing their reputation; they're terrified of another massive payout that could make their already dismal ratings look like the good old days. [I refer to the Nick Sandmann case where CNN paid a bundle to the smiling teen.]

Now, while the network's bottom feeders are dealing with sinking viewership and whispers of layoffs, they're also staring down this lawsuit from Navy vet Zach Young. This guy says CNN smeared him worse than a tabloid does to a Hollywood starlet, claiming he was some kind of black market profiteer during the chaotic Afghanistan pullout under Biden.

"It's a big concern of upper management," an insider squealed to Fox News Digital. "All the damning stuff, text messages, etc., has already been published. So I don't think there's concern in terms of exposure. But I think there's definitely concern about the outcome. It seems very likely that CNN is going to have an enormous payout at the end of this."

Young didn't just sit back; he warned CNN's reporter, Alex Marquardt, that he'd see them in court if they aired what he considered a load of bull. He claims CNN "destroyed his reputation and business" by painting him as the bad guy exploiting "desperate Afghans" in a segment aired on "The Lead with Jake Tapper."

The discovery process? Oh, it's like Christmas for lawyers, with internal CNN chats showing editors had doubts but went with the story anyway. And let's not forget the charming language used by CNN staff to describe Young in private.

But, here's the kicker: while this lawsuit is brewing like a witch's potion, the everyday CNN grunt isn't losing sleep over it. They've got other fish to fry, like their own jobs and ratings that are lower than a limbo stick at a beach party.

Another insider spilled, "I don't know if that pans out. But for some reason it hasn't permeated the org at all. And that is probably because the org is in toxic shock daily and crisis at its situation, so there are bigger morale fish to fry." They added, "Ratings, cuts, confusion on strategy, all of the above. Which isn't unique to CNN but is acute at CNN."

CNN, trying to put on a brave face, says, "When all the facts come to light, we are confident we will have a verdict in our favor." Sure, they're as confident as a cat at a dog show.

New CEO Mark Thompson, who's been cleaning up since Licht's departure, isn't denying the pink slips are coming. They're pivoting to digital, but with ratings that would make a ghost town look lively, it's like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

And let's not forget, CNN's ratings have hit rock bottom, with numbers so low you'd need a microscope to count them. They're losing to the Food Network, for crying out loud!

So, while Thompson's got his game face on, the industry's like a sinking ship with everyone bailing water, from the Washington Post to HuffPost.

"I think people still feel right now it's a very uncertain time in the business overall, so I think that there's still a feeling of, 'what's going to happen to CNN,' and that people don't really know about that," said the insider.

In the end, it's a mess at CNN, and this defamation suit might just be the cherry on top of a very sour sundae. Stay tuned, folks!


Sunday, January 5, 2025

Jake Tapper's vilification of Fox News may kick him in the butt in CNN defamation trial



CNN anchor Jake Tapper's criticism of Fox News might come back to haunt the network during an upcoming defamation lawsuit. This lawsuit stems from a 2021 segment on Tapper's show where they wrongly accused a Navy veteran named Zachary Young of exploiting Afghan nationals trying to escape after the Taliban took over.

A Florida judge decided on Thursday to side with Young, who claims that Tapper and CNN wrongly painted him as an "illegal profiteer" during America's exit from Afghanistan. This ruling allows Young to bring up Tapper's harsh words about Fox News from November 2023 in court. Back then, Tapper called Fox News a "cancer on the democracy we have" and accused them of not fulfilling their "grave responsibility" to report news fairly and honestly. This was first reported by Law and Crime.

Young is seeking $1 billion in damages, arguing that Tapper’s statements should be part of the trial to demonstrate that both Tapper and CNN knew they had a duty to deliver accurate and fair news. He claims the November 2021 broadcast harmed his reputation and destroyed his business, Nemex Enterprises.

Judge William Henry, overseeing the case in Florida’s 14th Judicial Circuit, has also allowed Young to use text messages in court. These messages allegedly show that CNN staff intended to tarnish Young's image as a war profiteer.

In one text, Alex Marquardt, the national security correspondent for CNN and lead reporter on the segment, said he wanted to "nail this Zachary Young mfucker." Another message from CNN senior editor Fuzz Hogan referred to Young as "a shit." CNN did not respond to requests for comment on this matter.

This lawsuit could be another public relations hit for CNN, which prides itself on being "the most trusted name in news." Previously, they settled with Nicholas Sandmann, a 16-year-old student from Covington Catholic High School, in 2020 after wrongly depicting him in a confrontation with activist Nathan Phillips.

The trial against CNN is scheduled to begin later this month, shortly after ABC News paid Donald Trump $15 million to settle a claim over comments made by ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos, who labeled Trump a rapist.

Tapper, who once worked for ABC News after serving as press secretary for former Congresswoman Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky in the 1990s, joined CNN later in his career.



Saturday, January 26, 2019

Nicholas Sandmann's family goes up against the media after he was dragged through the mud

The parents of Nicholas Sandmann, the 16-year-old Covington Catholic high school student, hired a heavy-weight attorney who specializes in litigating against media organizations for libel and slander, which is exactly what the media did to this kid.

WCPO reported that the Sandmann family has hired L. Lin Wood, whom disgraced and scummy former journalist Dan Rather described as the "attorney for the damned." He also said that Wood is known for "aggressive libel and slander suits against media organizations."

The family made the announcement in a statement released by the Hemmer DeFrank Wessels law firm, according to The Enquirer.

The release explained that "...Todd McMurtry, the family’s legal counsel, conducted an extensive search to find a nationally-recognized attorney skilled in the fields of libel, defamation, and the First Amendment." [That's the Amendment liberals think only applies to them.]

"Mr. Wood brings an unrivaled record of success in the courtroom, having represented such clients as the family of JonBenet Ramsey, former Rep. Gary Condit and Richard Jewell in lawsuits against the media," McMurtry said in a statement. "Mr. Wood visited with the family today in northern Kentucky. He is committed to bringing justice to 16-year-old Nick Sandmann and his family. Further announcements should be expected in the next few days."

Sandmann was thrust into national spotlight over the weekend after far-left activists and left-wing journalists spread a selectively edited video clip of an interaction between him and Native American Nathan Phillips. The activists, known as the Black Hebrew Israelites, a designated hate group by the Southern Law Poverty Center, a leftist group themselves, were harassing the high schoolers in front of the Lincoln Memorial when Phillips came along beating on his drum in the face of Sandmann.

Phillips falsely claimed to be a Vietnam veteran, [he did not necessarily come out and say it, but never corrected the media when they made the claim. He was in the USMC during the war but never went there and was a refrigeration mechanic.] He was also AWOL three times [Absent Without Official Leave, aka "over the hill"] and had been busted [demoted] to private. He also has a history in 2015 of lying about being harassed by white people who allegedly attacked his Native American heritage. The guy is such a phony, it wouldn't surprise me if he isn't even Native American--but I digress.

The Daily Wire reported:

The three-minute video was posted online by a group of Native American protesters who claimed they were harassed and intimidated by a group of Covington Catholic High School students waiting for their bus near the Lincoln Memorial. The video is heavily clipped at the beginning and end, and shows only an apparent "confrontation" between a protester named Nathan Phillips and a Make America Great Again-hat wearing teen. ...

Saturday night, a two-hour long, full video of the confrontation became widely available on social media, and that video shows a very different interaction than the one initially portrayed. The video, taken from the point of view of a second group of protesters who witnessed the interaction, shows that Phillips approached the teens — not the other way around, as Phillips claims — and that the teens were relatively peaceful during the incident, laughing and clapping along with Phillips' drumming, and occasionally asking questions like, "what is going on here?"

The Covington Catholic students were verbally attacked by a designated hate group that called them "Child molesting f**gots," "Dirty a*s crackers," "Future school shooters," and "Incest babies."

Rob Sanders, a prosecutor for Kenton County, Kentucky where Covington Catholic High is located, told Fox News' Laura Ingraham on Wednesday night that a criminal investigation against those who threatened the students is "already underway."

Full transcript of Ingraham's interview with Sanders provided [to Daily Wire] via Fox News:

INGRAHAM: Covington Catholic School has reopened but the violent threats against the students have not stopped. In fact, the Covington Diocese received a suspicious package just tonight. We share tweet after tweet with you from celebrities, liberal commentators calling for attacks and even the death of these teenagers. Tonight some hope that this hate speech will not go unpunished.

Joining me now exclusively for his first national television interview, is Rob Sanders. He's a prosecutor for Kenton County, Kentucky where Covington Catholic High is located. Rob, it's good to see you. What kind of charges could realistically be filed and against whom?

ROB SANDERS, KENTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY PROSECUTOR: Well, we have a number of different charges in Kentucky that might apply. The one that jumps out the fastest is terroristic threatening. Now there's three different degrees of terroristic threatening in Kentucky, two of them are felonies.

The most common one, I think that might apply in this situation is terroristic threatening second-degree, that's any time that someone threatens death or violence against a educational institution in Kentucky or any student in the educational institution in connection with the school function.

Now that is a Class D felony. It's one to five years in the state penitentiary. That could rise to five to ten years in a Class C felony if the person threatens that violence or death in connection to an educational institution in it the use of a device of mass destruction or weapon of mass destruction.

INGRAHAM: Yes. Well, you have - this is happening on Twitter though.

SANDERS: --that would double up the--

INGRAHAM: Mr. Sanders, this is happening on Twitter from different states.

SANDERS: Yes, ma'am.

INGRAHAM: --different locations, does that hinder the prosecution? I mean you don't really need an - I mean, you have to interview these people, they're in different states. You're going to have to get to them somehow.

SANDERS: Well, it makes it much more difficult. It makes it much more difficult, much more complicated, #1. There's a number of misdemeanors that could apply in a lot of these cases, but we can't reach across state lines and extradite for misdemeanors--

INGRAHAM: Right.

SANDERS: --which means, we would have to wait for the person to come back to Kentucky or make a stop in Kentucky before we could ever arrest them. But when it comes to the offenses that rise to the felony level, we can extradite.

Now it's not as easy as staying a Twitter handle. We can't reach out and just arrest someone who - half the time they're using a fake name, fake profile picture that sort of thing. We have to go through a process of issuing subpoenas, search warrants, getting--

INGRAHAM: Are you going to do this?

SANDERS: --information that goes with - it's already underway. I've had detectives in and out of my office all day today. We were starting with some comments, some threats that were made in state, because those are people that we don't even have to extradite. And we are moving on then to the ones that are out of state.

We've had the detective that works in my office has already been busy issuing Grand Jury Subpoenas and composing search warrants for detectives at other agencies.

INGRAHAM: Good.

SANDERS: --sending out, so we can get the information associated with the ownership of these accounts.

INGRAHAM: All right.

SANDERS: We get the IP addresses that are registered--

INGRAHAM: You got to get these people.

SANDERS: Then we find out.

INGRAHAM: I mean, it's only - you are only one office--

SANDERS: That's right, we find out who uses the internet, those IP addresses.

INGRAHAM: Yes, we get the IP addresses. We're going to follow-up with you later in the week to find out where you are on this. But--

SANDERS: Yes, ma'am.

INGRAHAM: --this has to happen. Because, until people--

SANDERS: Well, it's going to happen. Everybody's got to realize that these- -

INGRAHAM: --have to got jail. They have to go to jail. That's got to hurt. Otherwise someone is getting hurt and I fear - we're about to talk to Steve Scalise who felt it in a different way. Someone is going to get hurt or someone is going to get killed. Prosecutor, I really appreciate you joining us.

SANDERS: Yes, there is no doubt.

INGRAHAM: And we'll have you back. I know it's a longer segment. We've got a lot of people to talk to, so we appreciate it.

I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Abortion criminal serving life sentence is no longer serving for some reason

Philadelphia infant murderer who was serving a life sentence for his numerous crimes is no longer serving time. Kermit Gosnell is dead at th...