Democrat Jan Schakowsky legislates via her son

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) gives women a bad name. She used her son to convince her to vote yes on the impeachment of Trump and has been hammering her about this since last June, a full month prior to the phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that sparked another excuse for impeachment.

“It is my adult son Ian Schakowsky, whom I will always credit for my decision last June to support an impeachment inquiry,” Schakowsky said, possibly forgetting that this round of impeachment came at the end of July. “It had never been my goal to impeach a president, but Ian made such a compelling case,” as did her Ouija board.

“He reminded me of the oath that I have taken eleven times now to support and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Schakowsky continued, obviously not realizing that there is nothing in the Constitution justifying impeachment on the grounds the House is trying to get past the public's opinion. “He said, ‘Mom, this is not about politics, this is not about party,’ and pushing back against my arguments, he said, ‘This has nothing to do with the final outcome, it’s about doing the right thing, even if others don’t.'”

In other words, the right thing has nothing to do with the actual laws involved in this case, but it's about her son's obvious hatred of Trump, and of her kowtowing to her son's needs and her inability to make a viable argument supporting the President's rights under the Constitution.

“He made me see that it was about my legacy, my modest place in history,” Schakowsky said. “I want to thank you my son for helping me do the right thing today, to vote to impeach the President of the United States, Donald Trump, because no American is above the law.”

She should be proud to have such a son who is able to exhibit his mother's subservient role as a woman and as a mother.

Schakowski has set women's lib back fifty years and in the process, has discredited her impartiality in this impeachment.


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.





Tweet

SC Dem who smeared cadets, calls them 'immature'

Rep. Mandy Powers Norrell (D-SC) without knowing what she was talking about, gave the white supremacists at 4chan the credibility they crave, while attacking West Point cadets. And then, instead of making an actual apology for her clueless claim, she blamed the cadets for needing "sensitivity training" and attacked those who wanted her to apologize--fat chance of getting a leftist to apologize for anything.

It's always the liberals who commit the offense they blame on others. [Think Antifa claiming they're against fascism. Or Al Sharpton calling a Republican a racist.]

About two weeks ago during the Army-Navy game, cadets were seen on camera playing what is known as "the circle game." It's where one guy flashes the "OK" sign below his waist and if another guy looks down at it, the first guy gets to punch him in the arm. We played that in the Marine Corps and those who got caught looking were called "guppies," because they were easy to catch.

Norell's tweet:

"Three separate cadets making the white power symbol on television. Wonder what the culture is like for the cadet in the front. There’s no excuse and he and other minorities there shouldn’t have to deal with such a cruel and disrespectful environment.”

But Norrell falsely claimed that the young men playing the game were flashing "white power" signs, which actually started as a rumor that the real white supremacists on 4chan started saying that the OK sign symbolized white power. In effect, Norrell gave the real racists the credibility they want.

In her apology, she called the cadets “immature” and demanded that there be sensitivity training at the service academies to educate the cadets because hand signals mean “different things to different people.” [Especially Democrats who see everything in terms of identity, racism and victimhood, much like people with anxiety disorders who see the world as a dangerous place at all times.]

Unable to admit her mistake, Norrell then attacked those who pointed out her false statements as being “Twitter trolls.”

Several days after her tweets, the "racism whisperer" remained silent as calls grew for her to apologize for her false accusations against the cadets and after multiple media publications reached out to her for comment in recent days.

In her apology letter, which was addressed to Lt. General Darryl A. Williams and Vice Admiral Sean Buck, Norrell wrote:

On December 14, I retweeted a post regarding the racially charged hand gestures displayed by cadets and midshipmen at the Army-Navy game. I publicly expressed my concerns regarding their judgement and intent, as well as the environment at the two military academies. I took down my Twitter post when I realized soon after that the matter was becoming bigger and more volatile than the circumstances seemed to merit. I was pleased to see the findings of the academies’ investigations, showing that the young men’s conduct was merely immature and not intended to be malicious or racist.

I have written letters to the young men expressing my regret for adding fuel to the firestorm and offering them encouragement as they continue their studies and careers. I request that you forward these letters to them, as I do not know their names. I hope they can learn from this moment — as I have — that words, gestures and symbols matter, and that they may mean different things to different people.

Also, I want to take this opportunity to earnestly apologize to your institutions for some of the words I used in publicly describing the environment surrounding the incident as potentially “cruel and disrespectful” to minority members of the service. Though my concerns are sincere, those words were typed in the passion of the moment and without proper reflection.

Norrell went on to claim that the reason she assumed the cadets were flashing “white power” signs was because she has “always held our men and women in uniform” to “a higher standard of conduct,” which seems to contradict why she would make the assumption in the first place.

“Ironically, I now apologize to you and your institutions for me not being more mindful of those same character traits within myself when choosing words to post on social media,” Norrell later added. “I am confident that you and your staffs will seize this moment to incorporate the sideways “OK” hand gesture into any social awareness and sensitivity orientation your institutions provide.”

No. Don't incorporate any of that crap. Use the OK gesture to symbolize "OK" and to play the circle game because by refusing to give power to people who want to steal our symbols and change our culture is one of the ways of fighting racism, not by bowing to racists.

On Friday, the U.S. Military Academy released, in a series of tweets, the findings of their investigation into the cadets over the hand gestures that they used at the football game.

“The U.S. Military Academy announced today it has concluded an internal investigation of the cadets who displayed hand gestures during a broadcast of ESPN College GameDay at the Army-Navy game Dec. 14,” the U.S. Military Academy tweeted. “The investigating officer concluded that the cadets were playing a common game, popular among teenagers today, known as the ‘circle game’ and the intent was not associated with ideologies or movements that are contrary to the Army values.”

Despite playing an innocent game during a college football rivalry game, the U.S. Military Academy added, “based on the results of the investigation, those cadets involved will receive appropriate administrative and/or disciplinary actions.” Thanks to the female Fredo of the Left.


MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY HANUKKAH TO ALL


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.




Tweet

Fredo's brother won't let Trump-appointed judges officiate weddings

Fredo's brother, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) hates President Trump so much that he just vetoed a bill that allows all federal judges to officiate at weddings in New York. He says that he cannot stomach the idea that even some of the judges might be Trump appointees. That is the mental illness known as Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS).

“I cannot in good conscience support legislation that would authorize such actions by federal judges who are appointed by this federal administration,”  the progressive older Cuomo said in a statement Friday as he nixed the bipartisan bill that was passed overwhelmingly by the Democratic-controlled state legislature.

“President Trump does not embody who we are as New Yorkers,’’ the Democratic governor said, referring to New Yorkers with the same political affiliation but leaving out the many who voted for Trump.

“The cornerstones that built our great state are diversity, tolerance, and inclusion. Based on these reasons, I must veto this bill.” Because he is intolerant and doesn't include those who voted for Trump, nor respect the members of his own party who voted for the bill. Much of this has to do with him being a sufferer of TDS.

Under current New York law, all state judges can preside over weddings in their official capacity — as can the governor, mayors, former mayors, some city and deputy city clerks, local justices, clergy members and any member of the public ordained especially for the occasion.

But only certain federal judges in New York — from the second circuit court of appeals and Southern, Eastern, Northern and Western districts — are eligible to officially preside over the ceremonies. The bill would have expanded that to all New York federal judges, as well as those from out of state, and it would not be a big deal because it has nothing whatsoever to do with who the president is at the time, and has to do with being civil.

Cuomo took jabs from both sides of the political aisle over what critics called his petty partisanship.

Democratic state Sen. Liz Krueger of Manhattan told The Post that she helped sponsor the bill because it was a no-brainer, much like Andrew Cuomo.

“Four years ago, we gave the governor the ability to perform marriages. Two years ago, we gave legislators that ability. So when it was suggested to me that we expand it to federal judges, I thought, ‘Why not? The more the merrier!’ ” Krueger said.

“I’m certainly no fan of the judges this president is choosing to appoint, but since any New Yorker can become a minister online for $25 and legally perform weddings, I didn’t consider this to be a major issue.’’ Because it is not a major issue for normal people.

Cuomo’s Republican foes were less diplomatic.

“It’s hard to imagine a more petty, small action from a sitting governor, but that’s Prince Andrew in a nutshell,’’ said Nick Langworthy, chairman of the state Republican Party.

Marc Molinaro, Cuomo’s former GOP opponent for governor and the current Dutchess County executive, called the veto “absurd.”

“Couples can and do make the decision about who should officiate their most special day themselves,’’ Molinaro said. “My gosh, this state allows about any official to be a marriage officer. One can get a license to marry online.

“Why should a federal judge not have the same ability?”

Albany Law School Professor Vincent Bonventre said that while he generally supports Cuomo and considers “many of President Trump’s nominees to the federal bench … far too ideological and rigidly partisan,’’ the governor’s stated reason for his veto “is utterly unpersuasive.”

Because Cuomo, like his brother Fredo, is a block of wood. The competition as to which brother is the dumbest of the two rages on, and for now, Andy Boy is in the lead.

MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY HANUKKAH TO ALL


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.




Tweet

Alyssa Milano: "Use the force, Luke; use the force"

The following is satire based upon some laughable reality.

Trump-hater/agitator Alyssa Milano has a plan to get rid of the President of the United States: just lie on your back, look at the lines in the ceiling, breathe in and out, and recite the mantra: "Believe in believing. The impossible is possible" then "we'd like to create a changing of the guard." Do that for seven minutes a day, but remember, it's private, so don't tell your psychiatrist.

The mentally challenged Milano tweeted:

 I need your help manifesting a change-of-guard in Washington. For 7 minutes a day, I’ll be chanting the following mantra: ‘Believe in believing. The impossible is possible.’ As I do this I’ll be thinking of the special world we want to create. JOIN ME. We’re stronger together.

 Guru Milano then added:

“This is what I’m going to do starting tomorrow morning. JOIN ME. Upon waking, lay in shavasana (look it up), set your alarm for 7 minutes. Say this mantra: Believe in believing. The impossible is possible. And then out loud say, ‘we’d like to create a changing of the guard.'”

The Chopra Yoga Center for the Insane sort of explained the term shavasana thusly:

During this pose, you close your eyes, picture President Trump being impaled by the beak of a bald eagle through the heart, as you breathe naturally to the count of four, and practice eliminating tension and anything else you need to eliminate from your body.

Ideally, this posture lasts for 10 to 20 minutes … but with Trump as President, there isn't any time to wait as this is a national emergency, much like the stalled impeachment hearing in the House. So take only 7 minutes and think hard about that freaking screaming eagle impaling Trump through his f***ing chest.

Savasana helps relieve: mild depression caused by both of Hillary Clinton's tragic presidential losses; high levels of Democratic senatorial flatulence; headaches caused by having to think; fatigue from having to create false narratives; and insomnia caused by having thoughts of another four years with Trump as President.

Savasana can even calm the nervous system and promote equanimity [look it up, Milano] in your entire body.

With the election arriving so soon, cultivating the art of Savasana for destroying Trump is more valuable than ever.

Our society tends to place greater value on computer speed and productivity; learning how to do nothing like House Democrats is a skill that can help you become more indolent when you want to be.

At a recent rally the night before the impeachment vote, Milano screamed:

Fellow snowflakes, listen to me carefully! I am angry! If he’s thought Greta [Thunberg] was angry, he’s seen nothing yet … I am ANGRY! And do you know why I’m so angry? I’m angry because I’m so tired. I’m tired of this. Now don’t get me wrong; I’m not tired of fighting Donald Trump and his many, many impeachable offenses; I’m not tired of speaking truth to power; I will never tire of that. But I am so tired of being lied to by a president. And I’m tired that the entire Republican Party thinks that we are all stupid.

Well, no--just you. The so-called impeachable offenses you speak of have not as yet been enumerated by Nancy "Dentures of Fury" Pelosi. The two bs articles of impeachment are pure bull pucks, but give her enough time, say in another year and she'll think of something with which to impeach Trump.

Alyssa Milano is an angry person clearly suffering from TDS. [Look it up.]


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.





Tweet

Socialist AOC: "I'm not a socialist" "Trump fears me"

Not only is socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) obtuse, we discover that she is also delusional.

In a blockbuster of a saccharine interview with Noticias Telemundo, the Latina political heartthrob said in Spanish that President Trump is "afraid" of "strong women" and then hallucinated openly with the bizarre claim that she is not a socialist. The most frightening aspect of the interview was that nobody laughed at her claims.

“One of the most controversial people with whom you have had exchanges is the president, Donald Trump,” Noticias Telemundo’s Correspondent Guadalupe Venegas said to Ocasio-Cortez. “He called you a whack-job on social media. He called you crazy, right?”

“Si [yes],” Ocasio-Cortez succinctly responded.

“What do you think about the president?” Venegas asked.

“I think that if the president is calling me crazy, that’s good,” Ocasio-Cortez said in her annoying nasal tone.

“It’d be a problem if he said he agreed with me, because he has a lot of issues. He’s a racist and he’s anti-immigrants, but more than that, his administration is very corrupt. I think he has a track record of… I think he’s afraid of women, of strong women, of Latina women,” she asserted without being able to substantiate her claims, as is her wont.

In counterpoint to her claim that POTUS is afraid of "strong women," Trump employs more strong women as senior advisers than Obama ever did. In fact, he has done so even more than Bill Clinton [who loves him some women] and George W. Bush had done at the same point in their presidencies.

The notion that Trump is “afraid” of “strong women” is not well supported by facts — especially his record when it comes to who he has appointed as senior advisers in his administration.

In fact, Trump's appointment of women as key advisers so early in his presidency, is probably higher than any other president in the history of the United States, and perhaps the world.

What is AOC talking about? Does she know anything at all?

At this point in his presidency Trump has seven (7) top advisers compared to Barack Obama's measly three (3). Only Bill Clinton comes close with five (5) but some of them might be considered "bottom advisers" if you get my meaning.

Forbes was reporting over the summer that the Trump administration tapped approximately 300 women for politically appointed positions, and has appointed dozens of female judges and ambassadors.

AOC speaks lies to power.

Socialist Cortex said in the powderpuff interview that it was more important for fellow socialist Bernie Sanders [pronounced 'Sandahs'] to win in the election of 2020 than it was for Trump to lose onnaconna Trump hasn't done anything to fix "the system" in the United States.

“I want to ask you what you would tell the people who call you a socialist,” Venegas said. “For example, people coming from countries that have leftist governments like Venezuela, Nicaragua or Bolivia and who are here today. What would you tell them when they call you a socialist?”

“When the president or people call me that, I always say, ‘Look at our policies, what we’re proposing' [a Green New Deal that will bankrupt the country]. We’re not advocating total control of the economy,” Ocasio-Cortez lied. “We’re talking about humane economic rights [that takes the wealth from those who earned it]. We’re talking about education, [forced] healthcare, and fair wages [as she deems fair, rather than wages mutually agreed upon]. Here in the US, those values are called socialist values, [because they are] but to me that says a lot about where we are in the US. Basic human rights [which are not found in true socialist countries] are considered socialist. But what we see in this country is very different from what we see in others.” [Such as people eating their pets.]

Myriad op-eds of major national publications have all described socialist Ocasio-Cortez as a socialist, not to mention numerous think tanks and research groups that have noted her $93 trillion “Green New Deal” is “a radical front for nationalizing” the U.S. economy — which, by the way, is socialism — and the socialist has already admitted that her extremist proposal is a “massive government intervention.”

Stupid people don't realize that others are able to see through their radical ideas.


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.




Tweet

Woman who thinks she's a guy sues Nike for not calling her "they"

We are living in a crazy world where people with gender identity disorder are now considered normal and their diagnosis thrown out with the aborted baby in the bathwater. I know that sounds offensive because it is, but that's how crazy things have gotten.

A former Nike contractor who is a biological female because of her YY chromosomes and female genitalia, has sued the company and a staffing firm that hires for Nike, alleging that they permitted a hostile work environment because coworkers refused to go along with her delusion that she is a man, because she isn't, by not referring to her as "they," "thrm," or "their."

Some might see the refusal as a therapeutic form of reality-testing, but leftists see it as a justified limit on free speech, or any speech leftists deem offensive.

CBS News reports that computer engineer Jazz Lyles worked for Nike between May 2017 and September 2018. She "identifies as transmasculine and prefers the pronouns they/them/their," and wants $1,100,000 in so-called damages, because as a dude, her male sensibilities have been hurt and she has been crying over those meanies at Nike for oh, so long. Sigh.

The lawsuit states, “When someone refuses to acknowledge a person’s gender identity or insists on referring to them by a gender to which they do not identify (called misgendering), this causes real and significant harm. This is particularly true when a person is misgendered repeatedly on a daily basis.”

So we are being told that if a woman tells us she's a man, we are to go along with her delusion or face a lawsuit for our correct interpretation of her biology, First Amendment be damned.

The lawsuit also states, according to biz journals.com, “In efforts to maintain a positive brand image and reputation, Nike has stressed inclusivity with its ‘Be True’ campaign, emphasizing equality and diversity to the public, and utilizing transgender athletes as part of that campaign. However, behind closed doors, Nike’s culture is one of inequality and pervasive harassment for those who do not fit the gender stereotypes and mold of the dominant cisgender white male culture.”

It is also a culture of praising a cop-hating, knee-taking, mediocre football player with a grandiose sense of entitlement.

In response, Nike claims that it “is committed to a culture of diversity, inclusion and respect where everyone can succeed and realize their full potential.” Even the mentally ill who need help rather than confirmation of their false beliefs.

In September last year, Lyles filed a workplace discrimination complaint with the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries. She said, "The talked a great game on LGBTQ issues, but when you ask them to actually stand up for these issues, it gets communicated to you that you are the problem.” 

The Willamette Week reported:

Lyles started at Nike’s campus on May 1, 2017, working on IT teams that combined independent contractors with Nike employees and supervisors. Lyles was paid $62.50 an hour. Lyles says from the beginning, colleagues insisted on referring to them as “she” and “her” and greeting them by saying such things as “Hey, girl, what’s up?”

Now that seems uncalled for as it sounds like taunting, and if it was, she makes a good case in that regard. But let us not pretend she isn't a woman.

CBS News reports that the suit claims that coworkers termed Lyles “stupid” and “unstable," which may or not be true. It isn't nice, but it's free speech.

According to the network, other complaints are: one colleague reportedly told Lyles, “I know I’m not supposed to call you ‘she-male,'” another employee allegedly eschewed working with Lyles, and another refused to use Lyles’ preferred pronouns for religious reasons.

The company did administer training regarding gender pronouns, according to the lawsuit, but it made Lyles feel singled out and made tensions worse in spite of her being the catalyst of the training.

Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.

Tweet

Jealous De Niro thinks POTUS deserves to have feces thrown in his face

Robert De Niro is obviously jealous of President Trump. After all, De Niro will never have such power as a president of the most powerful nation on Earth, and while Trump is an actual President, De Niro can only pretend to be other people. He pretends to be a tough guy but it's only a role in a movie.

Maybe if he could play the role as the President, he wouldn't be so chronically angry and so disgusting in his remarks aimed at Trump. The things he says about Trump are not only witless, they're juvenile and it's clear that Trump has a special place inside the actor's head that he cannot shake free. It would be laughable if it weren't so pathetic.

“I’d like to see a bag of s**t right in his face,” the genius said Friday during an appearance on the Rumble podcast of leftist documentary filmmaker Michael Moore, another angry, morbidly obese Trump-hater whose last good idea was to forego the second Whopper.    

“Hit him right in the face like that and let the picture go all over the world,” De Niro said, like the sophomoric doofus he is, trying to be edgy. [He's about as edgy as water.]

At the 2018 self-aggrandizing Tony Awards, De Niro said a bad word several times. Yes, he dropped a myriad of "F-bombs" and showed the world just how brilliant and classy he is:  “I’m gonna say one thing: “F**k Trump. It’s no longer ‘Down with Trump,’ it’s ‘F**k Trump!’” 

For the left, the "F-bomb" is like fish to trained seals, earning De Niro a standing ovation and raucous applause. Wow, does it get any edgier than that?

De Niro also believes in some weird conspiracy theories.

In November De Niro told the Daily Beast that President Trump will “likely start a war” in order to stay in the White House for 12 years. He offered no explanation as to how he came to that conclusion, but then again, he never offers any serious reasoning for the things he says against Trump.

“I’m worried because if he gets re-elected, it’s gonna be very, very bad—very bad on a lot of levels. We already have a lot of reparations, if you will—repairs—to do to the damage that he’s already done, and he has to be gotten out,” De Niro told The Beast. “He’s going to be history at one point, though he’d love to be president for life. He jokes about it. I think that if he became president for a second term he’d try to have a third term, and let smarter people manipulate it into getting us into some kind of altercation: a war.”

Robert De Niro is not only a professional liar, he's also a mindreader.

It's obvious as to why he's so fixated on scatological references when considering the chronic costive expression on his face.

Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.




Tweet

Resistance to Va. Democrats' anti-Second Amendment is soaring

Gov. Ralph Northam

Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Virginia is not sitting on its hands after the state passed an extreme anti-Second Amendment agenda. Now nearly 90 percent of the counties have declared themselves to be sanctuary cities for the right to bear arms in response to Democrats' anti-Constitutional, anti-freedom agenda.

Over 100 cities, towns and counties have passed resolutions in preparation for leftist Democrats taking over the state and indicated a strong desire to confiscate semi-automatic firearms from law-abiding citizens.

“The National Rifle Association (NRA) has voiced support for the movement on social media but has not been actively organizing its supporters to attend local meetings,” The Free Beacon reported, adding, “thousands of people [are] expected to show up for a pro-gun rally in the state capital next month.”

Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL), a pro-Second Amendment group, is planning a massive protest on January 20, 2020, on the steps of the state Capitol.

VCDL President Philip Van Cleave told The Free Beacon that Democrats in the state do not “realize the magnitude of what they’re looking at,” and that this massive resistance that has sprung up across the state has “been like a freight train” in terms of the how hard of an impact it has had on state politics.

“[Democrats] truly don’t understand it,” Van Cleave said. “They think that money’s coming in from the National Rifle Association, some big organization is behind this. It’s not that at all. It’s mostly grassroots. Localities have passed this that weren’t even on our radar. It’s like a grass fire that the grassroots had started and then we went in and threw some more gasoline and a match on it to make it burn even brighter.”

I only wish the protesters felt this strongly about abortion in the state after the Gov. Ralph Northam made it clear that he's all for killing babies even after they are delivered as long as the mother and doctor make him or her comfortable and have a nice chat as to what they want to do with the baby.

“We’re gonna say you’ve got the partisan map then you’ve got the gun-owner map,” Van Cleave added. “In essence, this is a referendum saying ‘no more gun control.’ This is clearly not what the election was about and these people want to make sure you understand that. You need to stay away from their gun rights.”

Now they know what Democrats are all about. This has been their plan all along.

The movement has picked up so much momentum that Virginia Democrat Attorney General Mark Herring, who has openly admitted to wearing racist blackface, [as the governor did yet both refused to resign] said that it is his opinion that the new sanctuary cities mean nothing in legal terms.

“It is my opinion that these resolutions have no legal effect,” Herring said on Friday. “It is my further opinion that localities and local constitutional officers cannot nullify state laws and must comply with gun violence prevention measures that the General Assembly may enact.”

Gun violence protection? From law-abiding citizens who have the right to self-defense?

The issue has become so intense in Virginia that one Sheriff in the state has promised to deputize his citizens if Democrats go through with their extreme anti-freedom balderdash agenda that denies citizens their constitutional rights.


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.




Tweet