Obama the Movie

Hasta la vista, baby--the immortal words of Arnold Schwarzennegger in Terminator Two, Judgment Day, may have been the catalyst that vaulted him into politics as governor of California. They may have even been the words that Maria Shriver said to him when he was outed as the father of his housekeeper's child. Who knows? What's important is that the media has incalculable power to influence the masses and people like Barack Hussein Obama know this.  Of course, anyone who can be influenced by a movie without really knowing the facts, is gullible or simply wants to be influenced.


A movie is being made about the heroic Navy SEALs operation that took down Osama bin Laden at his complex in Abbottabad, Pakistan. This movie is scheduled for release on October 12, 2012, just weeks before the presidential election in which the hero of the movie, Barack Hussein Obama, will be vying for re-election and will somehow be depicted as the mastermind of the mission. Anyone in the movie industry would tell you it's virtually impossible to predict the release of a movie so far in advance, so it's without question that this is a political propaganda movie for Obama, and it's shameful--a strong president would not have waited 16 hours before giving the "go ahead," as Obama did--they may have waited 16 seconds. He is indecisive, fearful of making obvious mistakes, and shows us that he lacks true leadership.  He leads from his behind.

But if you remember the photograph of the administration in the war room, when Obama, Clinton, Biden, and the military leaders of the operation were watching what enfolded, you might recall our mousey president sitting like a child after an adult told him to eat his peas.  Joe Biden, a man you will never run into at a Mensa meeting, looked more presidential than Obama, and Hillary looked like she was the person in charge.  Yet somehow I know that Obama is going to be depicted like JFK in the movie PT 109.  JFK, who had a new prostitute to quench his sexual thirst, almost every night, and whose drug habit would have put him in prison if he weren't the president. The real stories are never told. It's the men you don't hear about who are the real heroes 99% of the time. The men who do the actual fighting, who risk their lives, and who quietly accept their heroism because they believe defending America is more important than personal accolades.


And what about the "kill photos" of Osama bin Laden? We were not allowed to see these photos because this may have angered the Islamic world, and we never want to anger or offend these people because that would justify them killing you and your children and you wouldn't be allowed to say anything about it because you would be wrong since you asked for it by angering them in the first place. 

But if Obama doesn't want to show us the kill photos, why is he having a movie made about the kill? Wouldn't that really piss off a bunch of imams and their loyal terrorists? Wait . . . I just realized why he'd make the movie--he would do or say anything, break promises, sell out his friends, lie, cheat, and probably kill, just to get re-elected to a job that he has taken that has proven the merits of the Peter Principal.


The most frightening thing about this movie is that it just might work to get our worst president re-elected. People need heroes and Obama will play one in this movie--at least an actor playing Obama. I hope they can find someone who is both eloquent and stupid at the same time, having big ears to listen, but never does.

Tweet

London's Burning

A young gang member gets shot, his friends get angry at the cops who shot him, and young people all over London and the surrounding countryside go 'planet of the apes'. Vehicles and buildings are set on fire, people are attacked randomly, and 16,000 police are deployed--more cops than actually work in London--being brought in from other towns. PM Cameron tells the nation that the perps will feel the full force of the law.

Why is this happening? Is it really about the 29 year old man who was shot? Lefties say it's the fault of the banks, but as they say in England, that is balderdash. The left is trying to romanticize this criminal activity, saying that it's frustration over lack of jobs and funding for education. It somehow doesn't feel right to me that these kids are thinking more about their burning desire to go to school, than their burning desire to burn something. 

In Philadelphia there are "flashmobs" going into convenience stores and robbing them. Because these are angry young men, they think they are allowed to vent this way, but in reality,  it isn't venting, it's simply an excuse to get a new notebook, new smartphone, or whatever, and now there is a 9 pm curfew in Philly for kids under the age of 18 on Fridays and Saturdays. The Mayor has had enough and he wants parents to act like parents and take control of their kids.

In Ontario, Canada, of "flashrob" got together after coordinating a rendezvous at a local convenience store, and about fifty kids walked into the store and helped themselves to whatever they could grab. They used social networking to pull this off.


What's going on with our society? Is it the economy? Jobs? Social injustice? Or is it simply the fact that they can get away with it and get "stuff" without the hassle of having to pay for it?  I really welcome your opinion.

Tweet

Illegal Aliens--let's call 'em undocumented immigrants

Obama wants us to embrace “undocumented immigrants,” and believes they need our help.  Specifically, in his Dream Act, Obama believes that undocumented immigrants who want to attend an out of state college, should be able to pay tuition at a state resident rate.  Legal aliens, who pay taxes, have gone through the legal system and have taken the time and effort to obtain the necessary documents to satisfy the legal process for immigrants, are expected to pay full out of state tuition levels for their college education. 

This only seems unfair because it is unfair.  It makes no sense, except in the case where this would get Obama votes and an almost guarantee of being re-elected.

But how can an undocumented immigrant vote without being discovered and outed by the “system”?  Well, if the Democrats have their way, there will be no voting identification requirements to cast a vote, and I suspect that each household in question will receive a pamphlet from some liberal community organization, on how to go about beating the “system.” This liberal organization will be similar to those community organizations that our president is so familiar with—you know, like ACORN, and SEIU.

It’s always the evil “system” that has held back these people who have come to the land of hope, the land of dreams, and kept them from succeeding.  It is never the fact that they refuse to comply with what is expected of any alien in any country who looks to make a better life for him or herself, and go through the legal procedures to accomplish this goal. 

Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an unlicensed pharmacist.  It’s shameful and Obama, if he had a real conscience, would be ashamed.

Who are these illegal aliens? Thanks to my Twitter buddy, Tom O’Halloran, I have a list of some of the contributions that illegal aliens have made to our society:

Contributions of Illegal Aliens to our Society (hat tip Tom O'Halloran)

2006 (First Quarter) INS/FBI Statistical Report on Undocumented Immigrants

CRIME: Illegal aliens account for 95% of all warrants in Los Angeles. In Phoenix, AZ, 83% of murder warrants are issued to illegal aliens, while in Albuquerque, NM, 86% of the warrants are for this group.

California detention centers hold almost 30% of the inmates who are Mexican Nationals, here illegally. Over half of all gang members in Los Angeles are ILLEGAL ALIENS

40.1 % of all inmates in Arizona detention centers are Mexican Nationals here ILLEGALLY

29 % (630,000) Convicted ILLEGAL ALIENS felons fill our state and federal prisons at the cost of $1.5 Billion annually.

I could go on discussing the problems with crime, but you get the picture.

BIRTHS: 380,000 Plus “ANCHOR BABIES” were born in the U.S. in 2005 to ILLEGAL ALIEN PARENTS, automatically making 380,000 babies U.S. Citizens, while 97.2% of all costs incurred from those births were paid for by American taxpayers.  (But think of all the votes the Democrats can count on when illegal aliens can count on them to look the other way.)

66 % OF all births in California are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal whose births were paid by taxpayers

HOUSING: 300,000 plus illegal aliens in Los Angeles Country are living in garages and about 60% of all HUD properties are occupied by illegal aliens.

SCHOOLS: 34% plus of Arizona students in grades 1-12 are illegal aliens and 24% plus are non-English speaking

39% plus of California students in grades 1-12 are illegal aliens and 42% plus are non-English speaking

In Los Angeles County, 5.1 million people speak English – 3.9 million speak Spanish

SOCIAL SERVICES : 43% of all Food Stamps; 41% of all unemployment checks; 58% of all Welfare payments are issued are to illegal aliens. Less than 2 % of illegal aliens  are picking crops but 41 % are on welfare

POPULATION: Over 70% of the U.S. annual population growth (and over 90% of CA, FL, and NY) results from immigration—no wonder Obama wants to look the other way where the laws are concerned.

TAXES: 62 % of all “undocumented immigrants” in the U.S. are working for cash and not paying taxes, predominantly illegal aliens are working without a green card

The lifetime fiscal impact (taxes paid minus services used) for the average illegal alien is $55,000 cost to the American taxpayer in a 5-year span.  You personally pay $11,000 every year to illegal aliens.

JOBS (per Center for Immigration Studies – September 2006): Between 2000 and 2005, 4.1 million immigrant workers arrived in the U.S., accounting for 86% of the net increase in the total number of employed persons (16 & older), the highest share ever recorded in the U.S. Of the 4.1 million, between 1.4 and 2.7 million are estimated to be illegal aliens.  Also, between 2000 and 2005, the number of young (16 to 34) native-born men employed declined by 1.7 million – at the same time, the number of new male immigrant workers increased by 1.9 million. 

This is only a partial list—to detail all of the contributions illegal aliens make to our country would take too much space than a blog should take on one issue. But the one thing you should take from this is that illegal aliens are a problem, and they are given a special status that they don’t deserve.  They are given this status because liberals know they’ll get their illegal votes—it’s as simple as that.  Liberals might tell you how humane their intentions are, but make no mistake; their history of civil rights, both pre and post Civil War, is abominable. They were the original slaveholders, not the conservatives.

If you want to read more from Tom O’Halloran, you can go to: http://tomohalloran.com/

Tweet

Obama is as Qualified to run USA as Stevie Wonder is to Drive the Indy 500

There is nothing exceptional about the United States. The Constitution of the United States of America is the problem because it forces people with different perspectives to sit down and try to negotiate. For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country.

Barack Obama, Cokie Roberts, and Michelle Obama each spoke these sentiments, respectively. I paraphrased them, but the words are accurate in describing their views on America, how liberals view it's greatest and most sacred document, and how they feel about this country.

Why does the American public vote for liberals? Well, here's a quote that may help explain: "How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think."   The same person who said these words, also said:  "I use emotion for the many and reserve reason for the few."  Was it Obama who said these words? No, but the philosophy seems to be key to his thinking. These were the words of Adolf Hitler, the hero of Islamists world-wide.  "Islam is a religion of peace.  We will never be at war with Islam," these were Obama's words. Is he out of touch or is he the least transparent president this country ever had?  He spent about $1.4 million in legal fees to stay opaque, in spite of what he said about being transparent.

The liberals count on people not thinking, but feeling; using emotion rather than rationality;  singing "Kumbayah" rather than "The National Anthem."  With the failure of Obama's administration, the failure to keep any of his promises, and one would think the liberals would ditch him like rats on a sinking ship, but they don't really care that he has no clue about what he's doing; or that he ran and hid at Camp David when the Dow plunged 512 points; or that he had no concrete plan.  They only care that he has good intentions--at least they "feel" he does, and that's all that matters.  Obama cares about people--except for those of us who actually make a decent salary. He wants us to share it with those who are out of work, people who need cell phones, and those who want to get free birth control from your insurance premiums.  He cares about illegal aliens and even calls them "undocumented immigrants," which is the same as calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist."  But the truth is, Obama cares about people's votes, not people as individuals.  And what would Michelle think if her husband didn't get elected?  Would she have not been proud of her country--ever? 

So now that the American Communist Party is endorsing Barack Obama he can be assured of at least another 70 thousand commie votes.  As it stands, he will be getting the socialist vote, the gay vote (ever notice that nothing is known about his sex life prior to Michelle?), and the mindless "his heart is in the right place" vote--even though his heart is made from Ben and Jerry's "Chunky Monkey" (oh damn, now I'm going to be accused of being racist by  liberals when all I should be accused of is trying in vain to be funny).  We can only hope that people on the left will realize that our country, while it has flaws, is the best of all the flawed nations in the world, and they will know that voting for Obama is voting for a person who doesn't see America as anything exceptional; anything better than any other country.  That voting for him is a vote for a person who refuses to identify our enemies, and support our friends.  Voting for him is voting for the only American president who bowed to kings, and who is an embarrassment to the office of President of the United States of America.


Tweet

Talking Points

"Bloodbath on Wall Street". "The Tea Party is just a bunch of terrorists, holding the nation hostage, with a gun to their heads".  "Acting like grown ups". "Eat your peas". "Hobbits."  Here's one from Moron Dowd:
New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd on Wednesday continued to ramp up the newspaper’s vitriolic attacks against Tea Party conservatives, bizarrely describing them as “cannibals” “zombies” and “vampires.”

These are the talking points being used by the mouth-breathing left who need to create scary images of the right because their side cares less about facts and more about Kumbayah, hand-holding, and intentions. The left create social welfare programs that are ineffective, but sound good, Head Start programs that don't improve anything except, perhaps on paper, and policies that on the surface seem all cuddly and warm, but when you actually think about it, are totally unfair and yes, socialist, like the Dream Act. How fair is it to be an American citizen, living in a state and having to pay out of state tuition to a college when an illegal alien is allowed to go to this college from out of state and pay the tuition rate of a state resident? What part of 'illegal' do Democrats not understand? Why are illegal aliens even allowed to stay here illegally, collect benefits that we taxpayers shell out, and take jobs from those of us who live here 'legally'? It only makes sense if you agree with a socialist state--that is, if you agree with Obama.

It doesn't matter if leftist policies fail, jobs decline, entitlement programs morph into black holes that cannot suck enough--like the mental health programs, for example, with their bureaucratic balderdash statistics, pretending to be making "progress" in the lives of people that they are designed to "help." What matters is that their intentions were good.  Of course, if you look at what motivates the left to create these programs, it isn't really good intentions, the real purpose is to serve as Democratic vote magnets. And while serving this purpose, the left can smugly assert that they are the morally superior because they really "care" about their fellow human beings, while the Tea Party and the right, are terrorists who are holding this nation hostage. 

They dilute the power of words. They are no different from those back in the days of Bush (pick either one) when they used the H Bomb to spread fear. Everyone who believed in the free market was a Hitler and some of these leftists actually believed in some of what they said. Even back then, the media was on the left. Even back before this time, the New York Times was defending Soviet spies like Alger Hiss and the Rosenbergs, but today, the media is so far over to the left, it's hard to tell them from Obama's administration. 

The one thing the left hates to be called is hypocritical. They have a hissy-fit if you say that they are hypocritical because they need to say that to you first, and you beat them to it. Obama and his 50th birthday was a fund-raising event--everything with him is a fund-raising event--when he takes a dump, he probably sells it as magical fertilizer and uses the proceeds for his 2012 campaign. He is more concerned with winning in 2012, the country can go to hell in a hand basket while he's campaigning and using your tax money to fund it. "But he's the President of the United States of America," Jay Carney says in his defense. If Obama had his way, he'd be President of the United Socialist States of America.

If you ask yourself the question, what scares the people on the Hill about the Tea Party movement, you might find the answer in their mission statement:

·         "The impetus for the Tea Party movement is excessive government spending and taxation. Our mission is to attract, educate, organize, and mobilize our fellow citizens to secure public policy consistent with our three core values of Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government and Free Markets".    The idea that those who are paying for government would actually want their money to be used effectively and not haphazardly, and that the law of the land, as written in the US Constitution, should actually be taken as the letter of the law and thus be taken seriously, and that government should not take over all aspects of our lives and should be limited, as Jefferson suggested, scares the empty suits in Washington. They might be held accountable for their spending--like the Pelosi Air Force jet parties that cost us $2.4 million,, or Holder's failure to prosecute members of CAIR, a Muslim Brotherhood organization fronting as a civil rights organization, or Republicans in name only (RINOs) who are elected to represent our values but are so entrenched in the Washington political machine that they vote like Democrats.  These clowns are afraid of the Tea Party because like any employee who screws up, they might find themselves asking the question: "Would you like fries with that order?"

So don't let the liberal bs talking points throw you off your own points, which, if you're a conservative, make more sense than their nonsense. The Constitution is not, as Obama said, a flawed document. The fact that our founding fathers had the foresight to allow for its amending proves that. The democratic process is not merely a tedious necessity--it's put there to keep potential tyrants like Obama in line. And unlike Michelle Obama, her husband's election was not the first time in my life that I was proud of my country--I have always been proud of my country and once we get rid of Barack Hussein Obama and his "transparent lies," I will know that all is well in Mudville--mighty Obama has struck out.

Tweet

NYSE is not NICE

The NYSE closed down at -512.76 and job growth is as anemic as a vampire victim. Obama has no growth plan and even CNN is pointing this out, which is really amazing since they have done everything but shined his shoes since he took office. Well, okay, that would be MSNBC, but CNN does go to the extent of generally overlooking his lack of leadership (which more and more people are referring to as "leading from behind"), and they seem perturbed that he is not being a real leader. The question is, does Obama have a grand plan--let's call it a political jihad--in which he wants the economy to fail in order to push forth his socialist agenda? It certainly is possible.

For political socialism to take root, the economy has to fail, particularly the large corporate structure so that the government can step in (a la GM and Wall Street), and bail them out; and in the case of GM, to take them over. Have you noticed, however, that whenever big government tries to play at business management, they invariably fail? This is due to the lack of incentives created by competition between like companies. It's really quite simple but the American public always gets amnesia when it comes to the outcome of socialist or communist regimes. 

So if the grand jihad is to put the economy in the dumper, Obama is laughing behind our backs. Kind of like he must have laughed when he used non-union workers to handle his fund-raising birthday party. My theory is that he doesn't really have a birthday--he is not human but a creation of a Bilderberg-like secret society, probably religious in nature, probably not the least bit similar to western culture. 

Tweet

High Drama in Politics

 The O Ship is taking on water; the crew is thinking of jumping ship. Bernie Sanders (Ind. VT) thinks the GOP has won large in the budget talks and 7 Senate Democrats voted against the debt bill to support this view. Wolf "I need to take a breath" Blitzer is even questioning whether or not Obama will be reelected, but Sanders thinks there's a possibility. Sanders worries that jobs will be lost, kids will be left out of Project Head Start (a program that has been as effective as a divining rod finding water in an Arabian desert), and the country will be going down the tubes, but CNN continues to advocate for Obama and his campaign as a good leftist media should.


Gabrielle Giffords showed up last night on the Senate floor, and while some may think the timing of her return is nothing more than theater, I'd rather like to think of it as high drama--after all, the Democrats are counting on her to bring in more sympathy votes for the O Team in 2012, and I doubt they'll let her disappoint them.  Remember when that lunatic Loughner killed all those people and seriously wounded her, the liberals immediately jumped on the bandwagon to denounce gun rights, and said the shooter had to be conservative pro-gun nut job. Well, it turned out that he was known as a liberal to those who know him, and pretty much non-political. But when Giffords arrived, her colleagues cried, sniffled, had runny noses, and for some, it "literally took their breath away," according to CNN. I certainly hope that those poor souls whose breaths were "literally taken away" have recovered from lack of oxygen .  .  .  literally.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta feels Giffords is doing well, but she still has a lot of recovery time ahead of her. Blitzer asked Gupta her about her speaking ability since the injury, and he believes that it should be okay. But the question I would have asked would've been about whether her judgment might have been affected from the shooting. If so, then it is incumbent upon her to step down--yet we all know that stepping down will never happen before the 2012 election because Obama needs her; the Democrats need her because they need to play on voter's feelings, rather than their intellect.  

Comments are welcome.


Tweet

From POTUS to KOTU in One Term

Budget? What's a budget?

So what's Obama's real plan? One thing for sure, It isn't about the debt ceiling, the financial crisis, or jobs.  No, it's about the 2012 campaign and what he plans to do once reelected. Perhaps he'll change his title from POTUS to KOTU (President of the United States to King Of The Universe). Maybe he will have our entire nuclear arsenal dismantled, or at least lower defense spending to the point that the military will only be able to purchase slingshots. Who knows, maybe we can get Iran to sing "Kumbayah" and hold hands with us. What we do know is that Obama wants to spend $1 billion on his campaign, and with the money crisis in this country, I'd say that is obscene.  


Obama, as you know, has called for tax increases on the wealthiest Americans--the corporate jet-setters and families who make at least $250 thousand per year.  But if you look at his 2010 tax returns, you will see that he forgot to include himself in the grand plan.  Obama has avoided paying his "fair share" of taxes that he would have "the rich" pay. Socialists always want to spend other people's money, never theirs.  If you want to read an interesting article from American Thinker, you can read it  here
The article spells out just how hypocritical Obama is--it's the old "do as I say,  not as I do" dance.

  How do we balance the budget and avoid default? I'm not an economist but it seems that the way the media (CNN in particular) is looking at government spending is an "all or none" model. They're talking about cutting out entire programs, but why not cut down how much we spend in each program rather than cutting out the programs completely? If we spend $7 billion in entitlement programs, why not cut the amount to say, $5 billion, and do the same with other programs. Military spending is another issue.  While Obama quietly snuck us out of Iraq, he got us into Libya's war (without congressional approval, by the way), so to cut defense spending would be suicidal. 


One thing for certain is that Obama is an idealistic amateur who has convinced young voters that he is the answer to the future.  But "Change you can believe in" turns out to be the $1.53 in your pocket at the end of the week. The rest of his promises you already know are make-believe socialist folly. Obama is losing his following--people who thought he would be America's hope now realize they've been duped by a sharp talking charleton who says what he knows you want to hear, but lies without blinking an eye. He does speak well, knows a lot of big words, invented the sentence opener "Look . . ." and actually speaks to your heart. But it doesn't get you a job nor protect your 401K and bank account. These are words spoken by an empty suit who does everything he can to protect his money while reaching into your back pocket to steal yours.


Go, my rant has ended. 
  
Tweet