Iranian Foreign Minister threatens Israel: a future attack would cause "all-out war"

Another Israeli attack on Iran will lead to a "widespread war," Iranian foreign minister Abbas Aragchi told the host of China's state broadcaster CCTV, He Yanke, in an interview published on Saturday.

The comments came during Araghchi's first visit to China since taking office, between December 27-8, the same day as his meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Iran, Araghchi added, is fully prepared for another Israeli attack. Despite this, he claimed Iran would continue to achieve things through "diplomacy," saying, "We maintain contact with other Middle Eastern countries and continue to consult with our allies such as China." He added that such diplomatic ties will prevent future attacks from happening.

The two men extensively discussed the ties between their two countries, drawing on recent examples of high-level interactions, such as Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian's October 2024 visit to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping in Russia. Pezeshkian referred to China as Iran's most important partner at the time.

Developments in Syria

Speaking on recent developments in the Middle East, Araghchi said that the rebellion in Syria happened "so quickly" and "was not expected." He emphasized his desire for Syria not to become "a gathering place and shelter for terrorists, and Syria should not become a threat to its neighbors and regional countries." "The situation in Syria should be decided by the Syrian people themselves," he continued. Nevertheless, he said the future of Iran-Syria relations depends on how the new government - led by Abu Mohammad al-Julani - chooses to proceed. "How we treat the new Syrian leadership depends on how it acts. Iran is completely well-intentioned. Iran hopes that Syria will stabilize. We hope to help Syria stabilize and ensure the safety of all ethnic groups in Syria, including Shiites, Sunnis, Arabs, and Kurds."

Hezbollah in Lebanon

Araghchi also heaped praise on the "resolute resistance" of Hezbollah and Lebanon, saying he had no doubt the terror organization would come back stronger despite the "great blow" it suffered due to Israeli retaliation. "Israel was forced to accept a ceasefire because of Hezbollah's resolute resistance to Israel's ground offensive in southern Lebanon and because Hezbollah caused casualties in the Israeli army," he said. "The resistance movement still has a bright future, and Hezbollah is rebuilding itself in a careful manner." The two also addressed the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas and the containing hostage-ceasefire talks. Araghchi framed the talks as a loss for Israel, saying that the Jewish state, which wished to eliminate Hamas, was forced to sit down and negotiate against its will. Nevertheless, he said that Iran would support any ceasefire agreement so long as it was accepted by Palestine and Hamas themselves. "Hamas and the Palestinians decide whether to accept the ceasefire. As long as they are satisfied with the ceasefire, we support it."

Araghchi also discussed a potential Iran nuclear deal, which has become a prominent discussion in US foreign policy, especially amid the incoming second term of President Donald Trump. Araghchi said it was important to resume negotiations on the Iranian nuclear issue but said it was "very regrettable that the United States decided to withdraw from the Iranian nuclear agreement without any reason." "The US withdrawal from the comprehensive agreement on the Iranian nuclear issue was a strategic mistake on the part of the United States," he stressed.

The Iranian FM ended his interview with a wish for "no more war" in 2025. "I hope that in 2025, there will be a world without war, atrocities, and aggression, a world based on fairness, justice, and the rule of law, a world that can face up to those who trample on the law and those who are against humanity. To sum it up in one sentence, I hope that the world in 2025 will be a reasonable world."

Tweet

Ketchup Queen's husband under congressional investigation for secret China dealings

Another member of the Biden administration cabinet is under federal investigation. This time it's Teresa Heinz's husband and Special Envoy for Climate John "Hair-plugs" Kerry. The House Oversight and Accountability Committee is looking into Kerry's secret dealings with the Communist Chinese government. 

Evidently, supporting the North Vietnamese communists in the Vietnam War wasn't enough for him.

On Thursday, Fox News reported that Republican Committee Chairman James Comer (KY) sent a letter to "Hair-plugs" informing him of the investigation regarding his covert climate negotiations with the Chinese Communist Party.

The letter also makes clear that Kerry, an aging gigolo, has to date ignored the previous requests by Comer and other Republicans to provide them with the relevant documentation needed to conduct the investigation. This may be due to him being guilty of treason.

“To date, you have failed to respond to any of our requests,” the letter states, “Yet, you continue to engage in activities that could undermine our economic health, skirt congressional authority, and threaten foreign policy under the guise of climate advocacy.”

The letter goes on to say that Kerry's refusal to cooperate with the investigation is a national security threat, but fails to mention that having an Alzheimer poster boy as POTUS is also a national security threat.

“The Committee requests documents and information to understand your role and provide necessary transparency over the SPEC and its activities. As a member of the President’s cabinet, you should be representing the United States’ interests. Your statements, however, consistently show disregard for American national security and taxpayer dollars.”

Let's face it--if Kerry gave a fiddler's fart about taxpayer dollars, he wouldn't be a Democrat.

But the accusation that Kerry's failure to be forthcoming about the details of his covert negotiations with a foreign nation is a huge national security issue, is totally accurate. This would be the case with any foreign nation and the fact that it's China makes it more an issue. 

Who gave this clown the power to make deals with President Xi Jinping without our knowledge? Oh, yeah, it was Biden's puppeteers. 

Biden looks to be in a tenuous position as he currently has to deal with the classified documents scandal, his whoring, drug-addled son's laptop situation, and the recent “Twitter files” revealing that Big Tech actively censored stories about Hunter Biden in the build-up to the 2020 election.

The fact that John Kerry has not been forthcoming with the investigation gives the Biden administration a bad look and make the American public question what was being negotiated between Kerry and Xi.

We do not have elected leadership in America at this time and the country is in crisis.

Tweet

Rumor or Fact: Xi Jinping under house arrest

Social media is a place where blood pressure might be in danger because everything you see there should be taken with a grain of salt. For example, Twitter is lit up with the biggest rumor of the year: the possibility that Chinese President Xi Jinping has been placed under house arrest after what is described as an alleged coup to dethrone him from power.

As per the rumor-- Xi Jinping is now removed as the head of China’s People’s Liberation Army or PLA and has been placed under house arrest. All this allegedly due to an ongoing anti-Jinping campaign in China.

There has also been talk of a revolt within the China’s People’s Liberation Army over the ‘Zero Covid Policy’ in China that mandates anyone who travels out of the country to undergo a rigorous quarantine process.

The word around the Twittersphere suggests the "coup" was planned and executed when Xi was in Samarkhand for the SCO summit that saw where global leaders met in person such as Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif of Pakistan.

There has been no official confirmation yet from the Chinese Communist Party or the state media about the rumor but BJP leader Subramanian Swamy tweeted that the rumor should be checked out. 

The Bharatiya Janata Party is one of the two major Indian political parties alongside the Indian National Congress.

Author and Fox News contributor Gordon G Chang reposted a tweet that claims to show off ‘video graphic proof’ of the rumor. According to the tweet, PLA military vehicles were spotted heading to Beijing on Sep 22. More unverified reports on Twitter that add to the rumor include that of the reports of no commercial flights flying over Beijing. Some China experts however claim that there are no actual signs of a coup yet beyond the commentary on social media.


This video of military vehicles moving to #Beijing comes immediately after the grounding of 59% of the flights in the country and the jailings [sic] of senior officials. There’s a lot of smoke, which means there is a fire somewhere inside the #CCP. #China is unstable. https://t.co/hSUS3210GR

— Gordon G. Chang (@GordonGChang) September 24, 2022

Another expert on China, Aadil Brar, said the reason Xi is out of the public eye could be due to self-quarantining in line with the country's "Zero Covid Policy." He believes Xi will "reemerge in public in the next few days."

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

If the rumor about Xi is true, this will have serious global implications.

Tweet

4 Biden Lies [aka misspeaks] During His Soporific Speech Wednesday

President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.'s joint session of Congress speech had less energy than a Solyndra solar panel at midnight in a cave. He sounded like a harmless old coot, but if you listened without dozing off, you might have been a bit nervous over his words.

But he even lied to the American public in the speech and here are just a few of the myriad fibs he foisted on the public.

1. He lied about travel with Communist Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Biden said: “I spent a lot of time with President Xi, traveling over 17,000 miles.”

But even the left leaning Washington Post said it  “could not get the travel to add up to anything close to 17,000 miles.” Perhaps Biden meant 17,000 meters.

2. He made false and misleading claims about guns, as is his wont and that of the Democratic Party in general.

What "Mumbles" said was: “In the ’90s we passed universal background checks, a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines that hold 100 rounds that can be fired off in seconds. We beat the N.R.A. Mass shootings and gun violence declined, check out the report, over 10 years. … We need a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. And don’t tell me it can’t be done. We did it before and it worked.”

Left-wing ProPublica reported:

A definitive study of the 1994 law – which prohibited the manufacture and sale of semiautomatic guns with “military-style features” such pistol grips or bayonet mounts as well as magazines holding more than ten rounds of ammunition – found no evidence that it had reduced overall gun crime or made shootings less lethal. “We cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation’s recent drop in gun violence,” the Department of Justice-funded study concluded in 2004. “Should it be renewed, the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement.”

And if you can't believe a left-wing report that goes counter to a left-wing President who pretended to be a moderate in his campaign, you probably wouldn't believe anyone.

Biden's words: “We need a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. … Talk to most responsible hunters and gun owners. They’ll tell you there’s no possible justification for having 100 rounds in a weapon. … These kinds of reasonable reforms have overwhelming support from the American people, including many gun owners.” 

This comes from the old guy who recommends shooting a shotgun in the air if an intruder tries to get into your home. He's a "shoot 'em in the leg" kind of guy who has no idea of what he speaks, or remembers what he just said, or where he said it.

When Biden or any president says there is "no justification for having 100 rounds in a weapon, that in itself justifies having 100 rounds in your weapon. He and his Party is the reason for the Second Amendment.

The Washington Post fact-checked a similar claim that Biden made 10 days ago when he mush-mouthed these words at a press conference: “The folks who own weapons, the folks who own guns, they support universal background checks. The majority of them think we should not be selling assault weapons.”

Bull pucks. That's a bald-face lie and he used to know it when his brain was functioning at a mediocre level.

The Post reported:

Numerous surveys show that a vast majority of Americans, including gun owners, support enhanced background checks. But Biden went too far in claiming that a majority of gun owners also support a ban on assault weapons. Personally, I don't know of even one person who owns a gun and holds this view because it's a lie.

The White House could not point to even one poll that supported the claim, while a recent Post poll found that a narrow majority opposed it. The president earns Two Pinocchios and a free discount ticket to a Denny's buffet with a free dessert.

Biden's words were: “From the very beginning, there were certain guns, weapons that could not be owned by Americans. Certain people could not own those weapons, ever. We’re not changing the Constitution. We’re being reasonable.” 

Biden may not have realized who those "certain people" he referred to forbidden to own guns were blacks and Native Americans [we used to call them Indians].

National Review senior writer David Harsanyi, who is a Second Amendment expert, disputed a nearly identical comment that Biden made 10 days ago.

Harsanyi wrote:

I can’t even begin to imagine what rickety basis there is for making such a claim. I mean, I wrote a book on the history of American guns, and never once did I run across any law that restricted Americans from owning any weapons they desired (unless we’re talking about blacks or Indians; because most gun restrictions in U.S. history have been employed to unarm the people who need weapons most). The idea of the federal government conducting any kind domestic “gun policy” whatsoever would have been a completely alien concept to anyone before the 1930s. Even then, no specific types of guns were banned from use. It wasn’t really until 1986 that that fully automatic guns were effectively banned by the federal government.

3. Biden took too much credit for the vaccinations that are being administered, almost as if he was the one who came up with the vaccine in his basement lab with his doctor wife.

What Biden mumbled: “When I was sworn in, less than 1% of seniors were fully vaccinated against COVID-19. One hundred days later, nearly 70% of seniors are fully protected.”

That's because the vaccine, under the Trump administration [as opposed to the Harris-Biden administration] had just been rolled out. By the time Biden took office, about one million people a day were being vaccinated and the increase, by the time Biden was sworn in remained along the same inclined curve that came before him. Had Trump won the presidency--and some believe he did--the same increase would have probably been achieved.

The Harris-Biden administration are idiots for wearing face masks along with the congressmen and women in the Capitol during the speech. They are all vaccinated and still did their anti-social distancing in the chamber with their "fear diapers" on the faces. 

Even the GOP stupidly went along with this moronic theater.

The Washington Post said that Biden’s claim is a “misleading statistic,” adding:

When Biden took office, vaccinations had been given for only about a month. Moreover, health-care workers, residents of long-term care facilities, front-line essential workers and people over the age of 75 were in line to be the first to be vaccinated, which is why a relatively small percentage of people over 65 had been fully vaccinated.

4. Biden also lied about illegal aliens saying,  “Over 11 million undocumented folks, the vast majority of here overstaying visas.” 

The Washington Post stated that while visa overstays outpaced illegal aliens who entered the U.S. in recent years, he “was wrong to say the ‘vast majority’ overstayed their visas.”

But let's face it, Biden was wrong to run for President in the first place and should have known that if he had any awareness that his brain is less dependable than a paper condom. 

And his wife, Doctor Jill Biden, perhaps one of America's foremost doctors, should have encouraged him to ride off into the sunset and plagiarize a book or something instead of running for President.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Xi and bin Laden like Biden for POTUS

Declassified documents show that "Usama bin Laden wanted to kill Obama so 'totally unprepared' Joe Biden would be president, declassified documents show.

" Fox News ran this headline in 2012 and the story came back to haunt the left on April 23, 2020.

“The reason for concentrating on them,” the al-Qaeda leader explained to his top lieutenant, “is that Obama is the head of infidelity and killing him automatically will make Biden take over the presidency... Biden is totally unprepared for that post, which will lead the U.S. into a crisis.”

And now that he's barely sentient, our enemies would be delighted for Biden to beat Trump.

At the time, administration officials said the Obama plot was never a serious threat, and today, he's even less than ever before.

This Thursday, writing in National Review, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) slammed  Biden for his undying support for Communist China; the title alone was a contemptuous attack: “Joe Biden Is China’s Choice for President.”

Cotton noted, “The Democratic Party has always been weak on national security when it comes to China. But some credit is due when it comes to China’s atrocious human-rights record and its theft of American jobs. For a generation, prominent Democrats loudly criticized Beijing on these fronts … Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi have been long-standing China trade hawks, for instance. Even a socialist like Bernie Sanders has been a reliable critic.”

Then Cotton took aim at the now somewhat disoriented Biden. “Despite the occasional box-checking, wishy-washy comment slapping Beijing on the wrist for the worst of its abuses, the reality is that the former vice president’s support of the People’s Republic of China is deep and longstanding.”

Cotton detailed Biden's past actions that held up his attack:

Biden discredited opposition to allowing China most-favored-nation trade status and World Trade Organization membership in the 1990s at the time he served as senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

His support of Communist China President Xi Jinping on his quest for absolute power while Biden “continued to push for closer ties and even more trade,” at a time when millions of American jobs were being lost and while his son, Hunter Biden, was involved in Chinese business affairs. Hunter accompanied Joe on a trip to Beijing in 2013, the same year Hunter joined the board of a Shanghai-based private equity firm. 

Cotton noted Biden’s obsequious attitude toward China, when Biden said, “China is going to eat our lunch? Come on, man. They’re not bad folks, folks. But guess what? They’re not competition for us.” And then said, “Our workers are literally three times as productive as workers . . . in Asia. So what are we worried about?”

Biden always takes China's side and Xi would like to see him in office.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

China is likely conducting secret nuclear tests

The State Department is seriously worried that China might be carrying out covert nuclear tests and if so, that would violate an international agreement banning nuclear testing. [H/T Fox News]

The nuclear tests are small, but a nuke is a nuke by any other name.

The State Department report from Wednesday was first obtained by the Wall Street Journal and it dealt with compliance with arms control and nonproliferation and disarmament. It revealed that China may be skirting international law and conducting the tests in the northwest region of China, using low-level explosive power.

Admittedly, the report was not able to show that China was doing anything illegal but hey, it's the Chinese Communists and you know that they lie like Adam Schiff, so it did raise red flags [pardon the pun].

"Some compliance concerns are raised and some findings of violations are made," it read.

Officials wrote that China had maintained a "high level of activity" at its Lop Nur site in 2019, running around like little coked-up munchkins, and they might be seeking to operate the area year-round going forward.

It also mentioned China’s use of sneaky explosive containment chambers, extensive evacuations at the site and lack of transparency on nuclear testing as reasons for raising suspicions.

The report went on to cite further concerns about China's possible violation of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) by engaging "in biological activities with potential dual-use application. [BWC also stands for "Beware Wuhan Coronavirus."]

The U.S. government also could not determine if China had shut down its biological warfare program, nor could it confirm if Beijing still had access to such weapons, due to its lack of openness, veracity and transparency. But on a brighter note, at least Xi likes Trump.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

China: 'The dog ate our homework, so we ate the dog'

Fudan University

China'a two leading university websites had published academic research about the origins of the Communist Chinese Wuhan Wet Market Lab Created Coronavirus, but somehow the articles have been deleted. Maybe it was the cleaning lady or cleaning man, but the mystery is, well, mysterious.

The posts of Fudan University ["Go Batmen!"] and the China University of Geosciences, (Wuhan) were somehow deleted from online caches. Could it be that China is trying to control the narrative about the pandemic? Maybe blame the United States for spreading the China coronavirus? It's a thought.

The Wuhan university appeared to have published, then deleted several posts regarding academic research that China’s ministry of science and technology needed to approve before publication. After all that hard work, why would they do such a thing? 

Smells fishy, or at least wet marketish.

Similar likely coverups turned up in the form of deleted posts originally published on April 9 by the school of information science and technology at Fudan University in Shanghai. But stifling free speech is nothing new at Communist China's universities.

“They are seeking to transform it from a massive disaster to one where the government did everything right and gave the rest of the world time to prepare,” Kevin Carrico, a senior research fellow of Chinese studies at Monash University, told The Guardian newspaper.

“There is a desire to a degree to deny realities that are staring at us in the face … that this is a massive pandemic that originated in a place that the Chinese government really should have cleaned up after SARS,” he added.

China’s science and technology ministry announced on April 3 that academic researchers were mandated to report their coronavirus findings to officials within three days or be terminated, which can have more than one meaning in China.

The news outlet noted that China’s President Xi Jinping published an essay in March that included “tracing the origin of the virus” a national priority; the science and technology ministry referenced the essay shortly before the universities changed tunes. 

Xi got a B+ on the essay.

The Chinese Communist government has been lying to the world about the virus and now they are covering up what they already published, and they have the help of the American news media who have become a propaganda mouthpiece for them.

It's time for the world to do business anywhere else but China.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Top Chinese officials must self-evaluate

"Fourth down and . . . "

The top cheese of the Chinese government have been forced to undergo a self-criticism session, according to the state media. This is a clear indication that President Xi Jinping is doing all to enforce party loyalty as signs of internal dissent are being felt over Xi's handling of the trade war China is having with the United States.

Members of the Politburo "were asked to conduct criticism and self-criticism in light of work experience," at a meeting held on Tuesday and Wednesday, state news agency Xinhua reported.

Below are a few of the initial questions asked by the state interviewer. The names have been changed to protect the identities of the subjects, all of whom sat in the same room during the interview.

The first question asked by the Interviewer of Chang Pong Bing was:

Interviewer: Tell me, Chang, what is your weakest attribute?

Chang: I try too hard. I find myself slaving over problems until they're solved. Sometimes I take problems home, make wife unhappy but she understand.

Interviewer to Ping Jing Jong: So what is your greatest weakness, Ping?

Ping: I get anxious when work not perfect. It make me to stay late and work until it be done properly.

The were also questioned on "how they have taken the lead to implement Xi's instructions and key Party regulations and policies."

Interviewer: So tell me, Xin Bo Khuan, what would you do if you saw an assassin about to shoot President Xi because he does not want him to remain "President for Life"?

Xin: I get in front of Xi and take bullet for him. If lucky, I die for Xi. He my president, that would be end of my life. No problem.

Interviewer: And now I'm going to ask you all to face the wall and I will stand behind you. When I count to three, I want you to fall backwards and I will catch you. Trust me. . . .


Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do.



Tweet

White House may sanction N. Korea

As a response to its constant nuclear threats, the Trump administration is considering broad sanctions against North Korea and would cut it from the global financial system. The penalties would target the Chinese that do business with Pyongyang, specifically going after the banks and firms.

North Korea has carried out illicit trading through small Chinese banks. The sanctions proposed would have to threaten to prohibit those banks from the international finance system and make it undesirable for them to do business with the North.

In addition, the U.S. may try to seize additional assets from Kim and his family outside North Korea.

Mr. Trump is scheduled to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping next month, and North Korea is expected to be high on the agenda.

The President met with H.P. McMaster, his national security adviser on Saturday to discuss the situation about North Korea. He came to the conclusion that the North is "acting very, very badly," after the country's rocket-engine test believed to be part of their missile program to have the capability of reaching the U.S. 



Tweet

Ukraine and R-S-P-E-C-T Tell You What it Means to Me

There was a time, albeit a short time, when Ukraine was the world's third largest nuclear power. They agreed to give up thousands of their Russian-supplied nukes if the U.S. and Russia agreed to Ukraine's sovereignty. In 1994, all three countries, along with the U.K., signed the agreement known as the Budapest Memorandum.

Now, 20 years later, Vladimir Putin has shown as much respect to that piece of paper as Obama has shown to that piece of paper known as the U.S. Constitution, or at the very least, the GOP.

Putin claimed the commitment Russia signed no longer applies due to the "coup" in Kiev that has resulted in "a new state with which we have signed no binding agreements." However, the U.S., U.K., and Ukraine collectively stated they treat the Budapest Memorandum's agreement quite seriously and expect Putin to do the same.