Left-wing anarchist arrested for inciting Capitol riot

Utah resident and left-wing anarchist John Sullivan, 26, was arrested by the FBI and DOJ for inciting a riot inside the U.S. Capitol. There is video evidence of him agitating the crowd and encouraging violence. He obviously was not inspired to do this by President Trump, but perhaps was trying to have fun because anarchists just wanna have fuh-un, yes anarchist just wanna have fun.

Based on public information and information provided by Sullivan in a January 7, 2021 interview, Sullivan is the leader of InsurgenceUSA, a group that organizes leftist protests.

Back in July 13, 2020, the scumcrumpet Sullivan was charged with rioting and criminal mischief by local law enforcement in Provo Utah in regard to a violent protest on June 30th of that year in which a civilian was shot and injured. The case is still pending.

There is another video which seems to have been removed from YouTube that shows a protest in Washington, D.C. where Sullivan is seen telling the crowd over a microphone “we about to burn this s**t down,” “we got to rip Trump out of office . . . f**king pull him out of that s**t . . . we ain’t waiting until the next election . . . we about to go get that motherf***er.” 

Sullivan then can be seen leading the crowd in a chant of, “it’s time for a revolution.”

Finally after the last barricade was breached, Sullivan and others approach the Capitol Building and the scumbag is heard at various points in the video: “There are so many people. Let’s go. This s**t is ours! F**k yeah,” “We accomplished this s**t. We did this together. F**k yeah! We are all a part of this history,” and “Let’s burn this s**t down.”

But as mentioned above, YouTube does not want you to see how the Left "protests," and they removed the video.

Now let me be clear: most of the rioters appear to be Trump supporters and they do not in any way represent Trump's majority nor condone the Capitol breach. Many also agree that Trump should have immediately diffused the situation if he could, but he is no more responsible for it than Bernie Sanders supporters are for the baseball field shooting by one of his supporters that nearly killed Steve Scalise.

It's disgusting that some on the left say that all of us who voted for Trump should have known what was going to happen. Ridiculous. They also say that those of us who voted for him are white supremacists and Nazis. 

Does that mean that since some pedophiles watch Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo and Anderson Cooper  that these hosts are pedophiles? 

Using Lemon logic it would be so.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Israeli airstrikes destroys Iranian weapons depots in Syria

Israel targeted Iranian weapons stores in Syria and were successful in taking out their targets. Massive airstrikes killed at least 40 people, 31 who belonging to “loyal militias of Iranian nationalities other than Syria,” as well as nine Syrians. Many others were injured in the strategic, pinpoint attacks in weapons facilities in eastern Syria along the Iraqi border.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) said that in the attacks that occurred just after midnight and extended from the city of Al-Zour to the Syrian-Iraqi border. It targeted "ammunition and weapons depots for the regime forces, the Lebanese Hezbollah, Iranian forces and militias loyal to it."

According to the Associated Press and quoting a senior U.S. intelligence official, the U.S. supplied Israel with the intelligence for the airstrikes that “targeted a series of warehouses in Syria that were being used in a pipeline to store and stage Iranian weapons.”

The official said that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo met with the head of Israel's Mossad agency Yossi Cohen, to discuss the logistics of the strike, adding that the warehouses being targeted also were used as a pipeline for components that were to be used in Iran's nuclear program. The clandestine meeting took place at a cafe in Washington, D.C.

The airstrikes targeted facilities in the area of the city of Deir Ezzor, as well as warehouses of ammunition and weapons in the Albu Kamal desert and in the Al-Mayadeen desert, according to the SOHR. They also said that “this Israeli targeting is the most intense of its kind on Syrian territory, while no response or attempt to confront the Israeli bombing was monitored by the [Syrian] regime’s air defenses.”

According to the SOHR, the city Deir Ezzor are under Russian control.

We are fortunate to have Israel as an ally as they are fortunate to have us. Imagine what would happen if Iran goes nuclear. 

Finally, please consider subscribing to my free blog, Brain Flushings. I can be satirical, sometimes angry, and generally fair. Sometimes I can even be funny--at least to myself and hopefully you. The only ways I get paid is by knowing I've made a difference in the world and also when you click on one of the ads on the page. Just one click does the trick.

Tweet

CNN's Jake Tapper questions legless vet on his commitment to democracy

Comedy News Network's Jake Tapper used to be a journalist. He is now an ass clown who has no self-awareness, as is the wont of ass clowns. 

On Wednesday, Tapper questioned the loyalty of Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL) who lost both his legs in 2010 in Afghanistan while serving as an explosive ordnance disposal technician for the United States Army in Operation Enduring Freedom. 

Tapper never served in the military but knows of the dangers of war because he wrote words about it and thus, he is loyal to American democracy.

Mast spoke at the House impeachment debate and asked whether any of the rioters who breached the Capitol on Jan. 6th had been called before Congress to say if their behavior was carried out "because of our President."

Tapper's remarks came during a broader discussion about the GOP House members who planned to vote against impeachment of Trump, a mere week before his term was over, as to whether Trump fomented the attack on the U.S. Capitol building.

“The other thing I think is really, really important is the fact that we have video,” said CNN's Democrat apologist Dana Bash, referring to evidence showing that Trump actually did inspire the Capitol riot, "and I was just watching it as they were starting this [impeachment vote in the House], of the people who were storming the Capitol saying, ‘The president told us to come here.’”

Yes, Trump did tell them to come to the Capitol, but if you saw the entire video you would see and hear Trump tell them to protest "peacefully" and "patriotically." He may have said other things he shouldn't have said, but clearly, he was not calling for violence.

"Technically, one of the rioters reportedly said, “Our president wants us here,” while another was recorded saying, “We were invited by the president of the United States,” but let’s not quibble."

“Right,” Tapper said scornfully.

“There is video of this,” Bash continued, “just exhibit ‘A’ of the reams of evidence that we have.”

“One other thing,” Tapper, the former journalist, interrupted, “what you're saying is relevant because congressman Brian Mast, a Republican from Florida, who lost his legs, by the way, fighting for democracy abroad, although I don't know what his – I don't know about his commitment to it here in the United States, he said, ‘Did anybody say that?’”

Disloyal American?

Mast did not say that. Rather, Mast asked if any of the rioters had been asked to testify about whether they attacked the Capitol building at the behest of President Trump. That would be evidence that might be impeachable.

Mast's words on the floor of the House: “I rise with a very simple question. On Jan. 6, thousands of people broke the law by taking siege of our Capitol here with us inside. Has any one of those persons who brought violence on our Capitol been brought here to say whether they did that because of our president?”

No less than 30 seconds of silence followed his question.

“It appears I will receive no answer,” the congressman concluded.

But the former journalist stuck to his fantasy of the events.

“Yes,” Tapper said in response to a question Mast did not ask, “we heard them.”

Sure, Mast was wrong about what the rioters said last week. That doesn't excuse Jake Tapper to use Mast's remarks to question his loyalty and dedication to the country that he served honorably for over ten years in the Army. The only thing Tapper has served is himself.

Jake Tapper is an ass clown working for an ass clown outlet that sees the news as performance theater.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

GOP Rep. will file for impeachment of Biden on day one

Photo: Tom Williams/Getty Images

Georgia freshman Rep. Marjorie Greene (R) said on Wednesday she would file articles of impeachment against Joseph Robinette Biden on day one of his presidency. [H/T NewsmaxTV]

"I would like to announce on behalf of the American people, we have to make sure that our leaders are held accountable. We cannot have a president of the United States that is willing to abuse the power of the office of the presidency and be easily bought off by foreign governments, foreign Chinese energy companies, Ukrainian energy companies," Greene said.

"So on January 21st, I will be filing articles of impeachment on Joe Biden," she added.

Greg Kelly, host of the TV show, said the effort would have a slim chance of success since the House of Representatives is controlled by the Democrats. He asked Greene if the move was merely symbolic.

"Well, like I said, I'm a big believer of having people in office that are actually willing to do the job. And I can't imagine people in this country being so fearful of a future of a Biden presidency that they may be willing to commit violence like they did in the Capitol here in Washington, D.C.," the congresswoman said.

"We cannot have that, I do not condone that violence. The American people need hope," she explained. "They need to know that there are Republicans in Congress that are willing to stand up and fight for them, regardless of being in a minority, regardless of having all odds against us, against me, or against anyone in Congress. We have to hold people accountable."

Greene went on Twitter:

"On January 21, 2021, I'll be filing Articles of Impeachment against Joe Biden for abuse of power."

Her spokesperson told TheBlaze the following:

Rep. Greene simply wants to be a voice for the voiceless. American conservatives have been banned, censored, de-platformed and physically attacked. Unfortunately that removes hope from the people. Congresswoman Greene wants to defend these Americans and represent the Silent Majority.

Not everyone thinks Greene's plan is a good one, including many Republicans. Some have said that she's going after Biden in order to raise campaign funds and gain political points. Greene has also been criticized for previously supporting the QAnon conspiracy theory, which is crazy at its core. Google it.

Greene made the impeachment announcement the same day President Trump's second impeachment debates began.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Clowns at Comedy News Network see good riots vs. bad riots

The two half-wits at CNN just don't add up. Together, adding both halves, you'd think they'd make a full-wit, but no, they're still nitwit half-wits.

Comedy News Network's (CNN) hosts Don LeMon and Chris "Fredo" Cuomo believe that there are good riots and bad riots, it all depends on which side of the political aisle you're on.  

Somehow these cretins believe that Black Lives Matter and Antifa destroying public and private property, burning and destroying businesses, attacking non-rioters including Andy Ng, a reporter, is justified, while rioting as a Trump supporter should be punishable by death or something far worse. Sure, I'm exaggerating, but only slightly.

Speaking with Ken Cuccinelli on his "leftist light" show Tuesday night, Fredo posited that trying to overturn an election is “different than being pissed off about being shot by the cops.”

He apparently believes that breaking department store windows and stealing TVs is justified when someone who wasn't there, and doesn't care, uses the shooting, justified or not, as an excuse. This has to mean that Chris Cuomo is actually the dumber Cuomo brother, but all the results are not in.

If you don't think Cuomo is a schmuck, then you're not up on your Yiddish.

Later, when passing the schmuck baton off to Don LeMon for the night, the two CNN hosts tried to convince their viewer or two on how the riots do not compare.

“That was a very important interview. And listen, I’m glad you mentioned about being shot by cops because you cannot compare. And I’m sick of people comparing. You can’t compare what happened this summer to what happened at the Capitol. It’s two different things,” said LeMon, trying to look intelligent.

“One is built on people, on racial justice, on criminal justice, right, on reform, on police not beating up – or police treating people of color differently than they do whites. Okay? That is not a lie. Those are facts. Go look at them. What happened at the Capitol was built on a lie perpetrated by the president and the people who support him,” he continued. “So, just on that one merit, if you want to call it, it’s not comparable. That things are not comparable. So they should not be doing it. And stop this whataboutism.”

Of course, they didn't mention the innocent victims in all riots. But if I mention it now, they call it whataboutism. Innocent victims are not only comparable, they are measurable. You can count the number of people victimized by both the Capitol breach riots and all the riots over the summer that resulted in billions of dollars in damage, loss of livelihoods and lives, but with the blessings of some folks on the left like Kamala Harris, Ayanna Pressley, Maxine Waters, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [aka Alexandria Obviously-Commie] and others who either refused to condemn the BLM and Antifa rioting or condoned it with excuses.

Fredo even said that whenever conservatives bring up the BLM riots they mean to say that they “do not care” about what happened at the Capitol last week. 

That's total bull crap. No conservatives believe the Capitol riots were okay. None. But conservatives call for law and order in all cases--that's what makes us conservatives, you dolts. It isn't "apples to oranges" as LeMon claimed. It's riots to riots.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Twitter's self-awareness is that of a cactus

You've heard the overused term 'you can't make this stuff up.' Well Twitter has people saying that and it shows the social media giant's total lack of self-awareness to the point it makes you laugh and be angry simultaneously.

The statement Twitter made regarding the Ugandan election, just prior to permanently banning President Trump from its platform, is almost too hypocritical to believe, but they meant what they pontificated to the African nation, optics be damned.

Here's the story: just days after Twitter permanently banning President Donald Trump from its platform, Twitter posted their thoughts about "freedom of expression" and "access to information" regarding the Ugandan election. Normal people who read the post either laughed at the hypocrisy or were amazed at Twitter having the balls to pontificate about the exact thing they are guilty of doing to the President of the United States of America.

The post stated:

"Ahead of the Ugandan election, we're hearing reports that Internet service providers are being ordered to block social media and messaging apps," Twitter Public Policy began. "We strongly condemn internet shutdowns — they are hugely harmful, violate basic human rights and the principles of the #OpenInternet."

But not so much for President Trump and a bunch of conservatives with different political and cultural views.

Twitter Public Policy next added: 

"Earlier this week, in close coordination with our peers, we suspended a number of accounts targeting the election in Uganda. If we can attribute any of this activity to state-backed actors, we will disclose to our archive of information operations."  

Then came the the incredible, blatant hypocrisy: 

"Access to information and freedom of expression, including the public conversation on Twitter, is never more important than during democratic processes, particularly elections."

Huh? Are you freaking kidding us?

When leaders from Germany, France and Mexico condemn banning Trump from social media, all leaders who are not fond of Trump, you know there's a "freedom problem" in the United States.

The anti-American values of the far-left didn't see it as a problem but they're too stupid to see that their loss of freedom will soon come for them.

Many normal people hit back at Twitter for what they said about the Ugandan election:

"Are there no mirrors at Twitter?" TheBlaze's Jessica O'Donnell asked. 

"High comedy!" conservative filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza exclaimed. "You can't make this stuff up."

My personal favorite:

"Twitter's like: 'Don't restrict people's speech, that's our job,'" another user said.

So Twitter shuts down the New York Post for a story they don't want going public, then bans prominent conservatives and President Donald Trump from their platform, and think they own the moral high ground to lecture Uganda?

If you don't see the unintentional humor in Twitter's virtue signaling, you need to pay closer attention. I will continue posting Brain Flushings on Twitter, at least until they ban all conservative narratives. Perhaps you'll subscribe to this blog and others as you see fit. I really hope you will because it's only a matter of time when the voices on the right will be hard to hear.

Please subscribe and look for other voices too. 

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Capitol Police requested DC Nat'l Guard assistance prior to riots but it was denied

According to Fox News, the FBI visited known Trump extremists and urged them not to attend the Capitol protest in Washington, D.C. They along with the NYFD warned them of possible riots, but the warning was as useful as teaching a catfish to shave.

Steven Sund was the U.S. Capitol Police chief during the deadly riots last Wednesday, but he has since resigned. Prior to the protests and riots he reportedly asked his supervisors for permission to request the D.C. National Guard to be on standby in case the protests escalated. 

Sund's request was denied. He revealed this in an interview with the Democratic newspaper The Washington Post.

"If we would have had the National Guard we could have held them at bay longer, until more officers from our partner agencies could arrive," Sund said, and described how the riots of January 6th might have turned out differently.

The Washington Post reports that on the Monday before the riot, Sund asked House and Senate security officials for permission to request the Guard be placed on standby in case he needed hasty backup.

But the House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving argued that he was uncomfortable with the "optics" of such a move. [It is unknown Irving's comfort level with the "optics" of the riots.]
 

Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger told Sund that he should informally reach out to his contacts at the Guard and ask them to "lean forward" and be on alert, he told the outlet.

Sund followed Stenger’s advice and called the head of the D.C. National Guard that night, who allegedly told him he believed he could get 125 personnel to the scene quickly if needed. 

The police chief then briefed Irving and Stenger on that information Tuesday and Stenger said the backup – which also included the Metropolitan Police Department offering to potentially lend a hand -- seemed sufficient, according to Sund’s interview with the soft-news, hard-Left Washington Post.

Since the cluster-fritz of a riot went down, Irving and Stenger also resigned from their posts and are salting fries and burgers at McDonald's.

The D.C. National Guard finally arrived when the coast was fairly clear at 5:40 p.m., or 1740 for you ex-military or European folks. By that time, four people had died, security was breached, and AOC was having a cow.

Pentagon officials said last week that Capitol Police never requested D.C. National Guard backup before Wednesday and later made an urgent request as the pro-Trump mob was about to breach the Capitol building, the newspaper adds.

"We rely on Capitol Police and federal law enforcement to provide an assessment of the situation," Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman said. "And based on that assessment that they had, they believed they had sufficient personnel and did not make a request."

And these are the folks who protect our leaders.

Sund told former newspaper The Washington Post, that now he believes the suspected pipe bombs found in D.C. the same day as the breach, were deliberately placed as a way to draw police away from the Capitol building, and it worked like chum in a swimming pool of hungry sharks.

"As soon as they hit the fence line, the fight was on," Sund told the newspaper. "Violent confrontations from the start. They came with riot helmets, gas masks, shields, pepper spray, fireworks, climbing gear -- climbing gear! -- explosives, metal pipes, baseball bats. I have never seen anything like it in 30 years of events in Washington."

In other words, they learned from Antifa and BLM, and honestly, my first thought when I heard the news about the rioting was that it was those two groups of anarchists doing the breach. I was wrong, although some of the rioters may have been from the left.

The Capitol Police has since been facing well-earned, bipartisan criticism for its mishandling of the riots.

But to their credit, the USCP was able to escort 99 Senators, Vice President Pence, journalists [it's unknown whether Jim Acosta was among the so-called journalists, but if he had been, watch out rioter--he would have taken yiz all on] out of the Senate Chamber to safety before it all went downhill.

However, lawmakers are frustrated that they haven’t been given a full explanation as to why the situation became as dire as it did.

Perhaps Jim Acosta can fill us in on the scoop.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Tenn. rioter allegedly seen in Senate Chamber with zip ties: held without bond

The breach of the Capitol and Senate Chamber last Wednesday was disgusting and unconscionable. Conservatives are consistent in that belief, while leftists forgave the rioters over the summer who burned, looted and destroyed private property and businesses and also causing grave bodily harm to many individuals.

What happened Wednesday, however, ought never to happen again.

One guy from Tennessee, an alleged rioter and insurrectionist who stormed the Capitol and entered the Senate Chamber had brought along plastic restraints, implying the possibility that he was planning to kidnap Senators and/or other personnel. He was ordered held in police custody Monday.

The Nashville anarchist in question, Eric Munchel, 30, known as the "zip tie guy," appeared before a federal judge, and was held without bond pending further hearings. He is one of two rioters who had restraints with them in the chaos going on around them in the Capitol building, where Trump supporters were rioting. The other rioter caught is Larry Rendell Brock who was arrested in Texas on Sunday.

Munchel faces charges of knowingly entering or remaining in a restricted building on grounds without lawful authority, and one count of violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. 

Since there was no kidnapping, he cannot be charged for that crime.

Eric Munchel is believed to be a man photographed [see above] carrying zip ties into the Senate Chamber during last week's riot, the FBI said.

Prosecutors asked that he remain in custody pending extradition to Washington, D.C.

The FBI said photos of someone believed to be Munchel was carrying the restraints, an item in a holster on his right hip and a cellphone mounted to his chest with a camera facing outward.

"In my experience, flex cuffs are used by law enforcement to restrain and/or detain subjects," FBI agent Carlos Fontanez wrote in an affidavit.

Munchel has not been charged in connection with allegedly using the zip ties because he apparently didn't get the opportunity.

Law enforcement encountered Munchel at a Washington, D.C. hotel the day of the Capitol breach. They observed him carrying a "Taser Pulse," a device that emits electrical shock. He claimed he had it with him for self-protection at the Trump rally.

According to authorities, he attended the rally with a woman who was also pictured with him inside the Capitol, they said. Their relationship was not disclosed.

A hearing on Munchel's case is scheduled for today Tuesday.

"I want to remind you that it's very important that you communicate with them (attorneys) about your case. You need to speak openly and freely with them," U.S. Magistrate Judge Chip Frensley told him, according to the newspaper. "You don't talk to them and communicate with them, it's real hard for them to represent you. We have challenges in the COVID era, and they're going to work through those things, and I need to work with them so that they can do everything they can to represent you."

It is highly doubtful that Kamala Harris or any other Democrat will post bail for him if it is permitted after the hearing, as they did for Antifa and BLM thugs.

Stay tuned to this blog for more as the story develops--if they don't censor my free speech.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet