Chicago mayor defends herself with the "R" word

When you cannot criticize someone of color with whom you disagree, because to do so would make you "racist," then you are putting people of color in a special category and thus committing what Condoleezza Rice calls the "soft bigotry of low expectations." Ironically, that would make you the actual racist.

In a knee-jerk reaction, Chicago Democrat Mayor Lori Lightfoot called a "Scooby-Doo" parody that criticized her 'racist' without having read it.

The Chicago Teachers Union posted a "Scooby-Doo" parody Wednesday which criticized Lightfoot for refusing to defund the police. The "not-only-light-in-the-foot" mayor suggested the cartoon was "clearly racist." Not possibly racist, but clearly racist. Of course, she provided zero evidence to back up her disgusting claim, a claim aimed at shutting up and shutting down people who disagree with her. But more importantly, she DID NOT EVEN READ THE TWEET!

On Saturday, the artist of the cartoon responded, criticizing Lightfoot for being ignorant of the cartoon’s true intentions.

Mayor Lori Lightfoot Blasts ‘Clearly Racist’ Tweet By Chicago Teachers Union Showing Her As Scooby-Doo Villain https://t.co/hQVe10KsPz pic.twitter.com/o0lILGDW0B
— CBS Chicago (@cbschicago) June 18, 2020

According to Fox News, Lightfoot  censured the image and the CTU in a news conference on Thursday.

“If that kind of tweet, which is clearly racist, had been put forward by a right-wing group, we would rightly be denouncing them, and I think our scorn should be no less because it was put out by the CTU,” she said.

“It’s certainly disappointing when a group that professes to be educators, people who are in our classrooms teaching our young people, would engage in these kinds of really deeply offensive and disappointing tactics.”

Electricstripe, the artist of the parody, asked how the leftist meme, calling for defunding the police, could also be considered racist.

“My only question to those people is, how can you have an illustration that promotes the defunding of police, in favor of the Black Lives Matter movement, and also imagery of a Black person being lynched in the same picture? It’s contradictory and simply doesn’t make sense,” Electricstripe told TooFab.

“I’ve been out here protesting alongside my Black brothers and sisters everyday that I can. Why would I throw that effort away with a racist drawing? There are people out here who really hate our teachers and seriously went out of their way to make something what it’s not.”

“When the illustration was described to our mayor, (which I had no idea she was visually impaired to see it for herself) they were described as a group of ‘unhappy white people, around a tied up black woman in rope,'” he said.

“You can already imagine what kind of image pops up into your head when you hear such description. They decided to only describe what was most convenient for them.”

The left eating its own--it has to make you smile.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Hillary speak with forked tongue on private server

Hillary Clinton never told a lie . . . that she didn't like, or that wasn't politically expedient for her. Regarding the email scandal, she has changed her story as often as a mother changes her infant's diaper. 

In fact, there's a disturbing similarity in that analogy.

Now her email infamy claim about her personal server claiming that "everybody's doing it" doesn't wash with the State Department's former Inspector General, Howard Krongard. In fact, he said that had he been IG at the time, he would have started an investigation. 

Krongard also said that Condoleezza Rice did not use a personal server for government business, but Clinton did.

"Certainly to my knowledge at least, Secretary [Condoleezza] Rice did not have a personal server. I certainly never either sent an email to one or received an email from one," Krongard said. 

He continued, "I would have been stunned had I been asked to send an email to her at a personal server, private address. I would have declined to do so on security grounds and if she had sent one to me, I probably would have started an investigation.


John Hickenlooper  (Duh-Colo.) believes the only reason Hillary is being attacked over the personal email server is because she's a woman (and the reason she's giving the economy job to Bill--girls aren't good at math) proving once again that Democrats are stupid.

If women want to be treated as men, and men running for President are closely scrutinized, then Hillary needs to be closely scrutinized. 

Double-Duh.

The only reason Clinton used a personal server was to avoid Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. There is no question that Hillary Clinton was in violation of Federal law.


There is a big question as to whether she will be indicted .  .  .  can you indict a monarch?


Tweet

Hillary Clinton's emails may be recovered

It is possible that copies or logs of Hillary Clinton's emails are stored on servers of companies she used for her private email domain. If so, these additional emails would provide more information to hackers and they would also allow federal agencies investigating the former secretary of state's server to compare those records with what she turned over to the State Department in December.

Hillary said she handed over all work-related emails to State, but if you believe that, you might think that dark cloud above you is a gaggle of chickens coming home to roost.

The Daily Caller interviewed an IT pro who explained that mail exchange records (MX records) for Hillary's email domain, clintonemail.com, indicate that emails entering her server first entered via MxLogic, a spam management and compliance company now owned by McAfee. It's unclear if her outbound email also went through MxLogic, but it's a good bet that it did.

An apparent IT expert interviewed by TheDC, and whose last name is Walker (first name not given) said, "I'd bet to some extent that [Clinton's] emails are sitting in an MxLogic data center either on the server used to service her domain, or within their elaborate backup system. Even if she somehow wiped the data from MxLogic through their interfaces, it probably still exists somewhere within their organization."

Walker admits the company might not have the actual contents of the emails, "but they do have logs of all of the transactions that took place." He was also surprised that Hillary's server configuration was pointing to MxLogic's servers, not her own.

"If I'm in the business of hiding email servers from governments I think I would point my MX record directly to my mail server and handle my anti-spam problem on my own server, and not through a third-party company," Walker said.

Another IT expert (who wishes to remain anonymous due to the Clinton's history of causing others to mysteriously commit suicide) has been looking into the Clinton email scandal and says he has no doubt that McAfee "has log files of all the email traffic that passed through their firewall to or from clintonemail.com."

This same expert believes that a congressional committee investigating the Clinton's server setup "should require McAfee to describe in detail the disposition of transaction logs kept by their servers covering email transfers to and from clintonemail.com." And if they destroyed the logs, they need to ask McAfee why and when.

Unlike some Americans, I have no doubts about Hillary Clinton.

Some people think she's God's gift to womankind; I see her as God's "Punk'd" to women. She pays them less and in countries that oppress women, she takes bribes from their leaders as a "donation" to her foundation.

Some people think Hillary is as truthful as Mother Theresa. I see her as truthful as her husband, Bill, when he said, "I did not have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinsky." 

Some people see Hillary as a strong, competent leader. Those people have Hillary confused with Carly Fiorina, Condoleezza Rice, Sarah Palin, and Michele Bachmann.

Hillary Clinton is a fraud. She was impotent as Secretary of State but the liberal media never challenged her on those supposed accomplishments.

Somehow the liberal public is convinced that she has a date with destiny to be our next president. I hope her date with destiny is in a federal prison if she is found guilty of the charges regarding national security. It is unacceptable for there to be two rules  of law: one for the public and another for high-ranking politicians.

We have become a nation cleaved in the middle by this administration, led by a man who promised to bring us together, to end racism and poverty, to part the ocean. He hawked "Hope and Change."

Now intelligent Americans are hoping to change what Obama has brought to us and what Hillary Clinton would carry on if somehow she becomes our next president.

But some liberals vote based on the demographics of the liberal candidate, not with logic and facts. They want the first black president to be followed by the first female president, but they don't have a problem with schools like Washington University to ban words like 'female.' 

As things stand now, Clinton's emails may be recovered by the FBI and handed over to the Benghazi committee and scrutinized to find if any classified information was sent or received on her server. 

Whether or not the FBI finds she lied about the emails she sent or received, there should be no mistaking the fact that Hillary Clinton is not fit to be president.

But since when has that fact gotten in the way of liberal voters?

Tweet

Deepa Kumar's PR ploy: good thing she's an American leftist

Not So Deep

Deepa Kumar is a Marxist, misandrist and a professor of journalism at Rutgers University. She has written a novel about Islamophobia and is likely looking to get her face in the media to hawk it, a technique known as capitalism.

Kumar has made the schizophrenic claim that the U.S. is "more brutal" than ISIS and also made racial slurs against white men in our country.

Kumar is able to say these things precisely because she is wrong about this nation. And her status as someone who 'professes' to know something she hasn't got a clue about

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

The reason she is able to say these hateful things is precisely because she is wrong about the US. She is someone who 'professes' to know something about white men in the US, but doesn't have a clue about the issues. The sounds that come out of their mouth and the words that creep into their tweets demonstrate how racist she is--and that's a word I don't like throwing out there.

This so-called professor also attacked Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a woman who was forced to undergo female genital mutilation as a young girl due to her family's Islamic practices. Kumar called her an 'Islamophobe.' The word 'Islamophobe' is used to silence people from exploring Islam and how it treats women, atheists, homosexuals, infidels, Christians and Jews. It's akin to being called a racist, but look closer and come to your own conclusion as to who's calling the kettle 'white.'

 I wonder how intact Kumar's clitoris is to say such things about Ayaan Ali.

 In fact, Kumar's Hindu background would get her killed by ISIS if she refused to convert to Islam. And if she's an atheist, it's an automatic beheading. In the US, she is able to say we are more brutal, but if she said that in ISIS controlled Syria, for example, she'd be killed on the spot.

Kumar led the protest that stopped former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice from speaking to students at the school. I guess her belief in the First Amendment only applies to other leftists who support her ideas. 

What are our institutions for higher learning coming to? Maybe they define "higher" another way.

The sludge-slinging Kumar recently tweeted: "Yes, ISIS is brutal, but US is more so, 1.3 million killed in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan."

But even before that obnoxious statement, Kumar tweeted: "Okay, I'm sold on using the term 'douchebag' to describe rich, white entitled males and their misgynistic, racist behavior!" She didn't give examples and I suspect her generalizing comes from her feelings over the lack of facts.

Kumar claims to love Marxism, perhaps due to the lifestyle and personality of Karl Marx. 

Marx had seven children but lived in such poor conditions while in London, only three survived to adulthood. It's also alleged that he fathered a son, Freddy, by his housekeeper, Helene Demuth. 

Lucky for Kumar she lives in a country where she can say such things and not be killed for it. 

Maybe she needs to relax at a White Castle.




Tweet