Biden: "Rational" gun 'policy' is to ban '50 clips in a weapon' and more gibberish

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden knows as much about weaponry as Alexandria Obviously-Comatose knows about psychocypernetics and the branches of government.

Regarding guns, he believes we need a "rational policy" that ensures people cannot have "50 clips in a weapon," which illustrates that he doesn't know a clip from a round, a round from his butt, and his butt from AOC.

"Middle class Joe" as he claims people call him, added that a person would need a lot more than an AK-47 to take on a tyrannical government. He made his brilliant observations on the New Hampshire campaign trail while discussing why children learn active shooter drills in schools, saying, 'because we're unwilling to have a rational policy that says you cannot have 20, 30, 40, 50 clips in a weapon."

The Biden Special

And like the broken clock analogy that's right twice a day, the clip analogy is correct--you absolutely cannot jam even 2 clips in a weapon at the same time.

Biden also tossed out the claim: “I now have over 58% of the NRA members acknowledging that you cannot own an assault weapon. There is no need for it. You can’t have a magazine that is more than 10 rounds in it.”

The NRA told Daily Wire that Biden's claim is pure bullcrap because as a private organization, they do not give out private information on its members, and certainly not for polling purposes.

At a different point in his spectacular town hall, the Democratic rear-runner said, “Those who say, ‘The tree of liberty is watered with the blood of patriots’ – a great line, well, guess what: The fact is, if you’re going to take on the government, you need an F-15 with Hellfire Missiles. There is no way an AK-47 is going to take care of you if you’re worried about the government knocking down your door.”

F-15's don't use Hellfire missiles in their arsenal. Helicopters and drones are the main users of this air to ground missile. But c'mon, man . . . it sounds macho.

Biden’s remarks drew instant mockery online from critics who attacked his abject ignorance on weaponry.

Federalist co-founder Sean Davis wrote: “Joe Biden is so dain-bramaged that he thinks ‘The government will bomb your house if you get out of line’ is an A+ argument against the 2A in the state whose motto—’Live Free or Die’—was coined by a militiaman who personally defeated the British Empire.”

Biden’s ignorant gun control policies includes banning semi-automatic firearms and “magazines that can hold multiple bullets in them,” which effectively would ban the overwhelming majority of firearms.

Not only do Biden’s views on guns go against the U.S. Constitution, they are also non-nonsensical and only work in favor of miscreants who own illegal firearms.

For example, last September Biden attacked Texas Governor Greg Abbott for signing a bill into law that made it easier for Texas to carry firearms into their places of worship.

“Dealing with firearms, it is irrational, with all due respect to the governor of Texas, irrational what they are doing,” Biden told reporters on September 2. 

“On the very day you see a mass shooting … and we’re talking about loosening access to have guns, to be able to take them into places of worship, it’s just absolutely irrational. It’s totally irrational.” Which is why Biden is an idiot who is consistently falling in the polling because it was Jack Wilson, a good guy with a gun, who saved lives in a church shooting several months later.

But maybe the Democrats don't want to stop mass killing. After all, every one of them agreed that killing a mass murderer terrorist, Cassem Soleimani, was something we should not have done.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

AOC quotes Milton Keynes, a fictional economist

Perhaps the reason the Democratic Party doesn't do so well with economic growth has more to do with the "geniuses" in the Democratic Party who don't know their elbow from their nether regions.

Enter Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [aka Alexandria Obviously-Comatose].

Once thought to be the "future" of the Democratic Party by DNC Chairman Tom "Potty Mouth" Perez, socialist and Boston University graduate AOC (D-NY) went on Instagram Saturday to enlighten the world with her analysis of our country's economy.

She said she recently read how, in 1930, "famed economist Milton Keynes predicted that by 2030, GDP and technology would have advanced so much, that it would allow everyday people to work as little as fifteen hours a week and provide for their families."

Not only does this aim to appeal to those who hate working, it also appeals to those who are clueless about what this cretin says. There is no such "famous economist" named Milton Keynes, nor has there ever been.

Comatose evidently confused famed libertarian economist Milton Friedman with John Maynard Keynes, the latter who was a progressive liberal.

She later clarified that she'd mistaken Friedman with Keynes which would have given her a zero on her economics exam, and pretended it was a typographical error. Except if you look at the video which I so graciously provided below, you can see that she doesn't appear to be reading from a script.

"UGGGH TYPO. It's John Maynard Keynes. Mixed his name with Milton Friedman — a (very) different economist," she wrote in a subsequent Instagram story.

The Cambridge Dictionary defines typo thus: a mistake made in printed material produced by a computer or a typewriter.

So AOC not only doesn't know what she's talking about, she doesn't even know that what she's talking about wasn't a typo. Imagine her as POTUS some day.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Billionaire-dissing Fauxcahontas is willing to take money from billionaire Bloomberg if he offered

After Friday's ABC Democratic primary debate in New Hampshire, Sen. Elizabeth "1/1024" Warren (D-MA) held a pow-wow with CNN's Dana Bash and Erin Burnett.

Warren spoke about her travels [via private fuel-guzzling jet] to “31 states and Puerto Rico,” and asserted that she isn’t “sucking up to billionaires and spending 70% of [her] time on fund-raising.” Definitely not those bad, bad terrible no-good billionaires because she's only a millionaire and they're okay, just like Comrade Bernie Sanders.

Burnett asked a follow-up question pertaining to rival billionaire Michael Bloomberg.

The following exchange should have occurred but didn't exactly:

BURNETT: On this issue of billionaires – you brought it up, obviously, with Mayor Pete and specifically the PACs and everything else – you know, Mayor Bloomberg obviously is out there now, right? He’s spending a lot of money, and he has said if he’s not the nominee, he’s willing to support whoever is.

WARREN: Good. The little twerp has no business running for president. He's white and he looks like a freaking puppet. He has the audacity to want a box to stand on at the debates.

BURNETT: Anyway, ff that’s you, if you were the nominee, would you take his money?

WARREN: Of course I would. What the hell is wrong with you?  I have flexible standards because I am what's best for the country, and when I become the Chief, you will see the heads of corporate billionaires roll like balls at a busy bowling alley.

She then tried to explain her rationale and perception of the difference between what her semi-rich rivals are doing and what she would be doing in accepting Bloomberg’s donations.

"Because look, what I believe is that we should not be selling access to our time. You know, this isn’t for special meetings and listen to my little issue. This is about how our democracy should work. I get it, rich people can own more shoes than the rest of us, more cars than the rest of us, maybe more houses than the rest of us – but by golly, they shouldn’t own a bigger share of our democracy. I want that and their freaking cars and shoes too.

BURNETT: But aren't you already a rich person? And what you just said makes no sense. What are you talking about?

Warren then deflected the question and took the opportunity to criticize the idea of a wealthy person self-financing their campaign:

“Anyone who spends their own money rather than other people's money, is a capitalist and that in itself should be grounds to throw the bum out. Capitalism, free trade, allowing the market to determine the value of goods and services goes against the very foundation of what me and Bernie Sanders have been advocating for--the good will of the government taking care of our needs.

"And that is why, for me, I think we should not be doing these campaigns either letting billionaires finance themselves, or using unlimited spending through Super PACs which everybody on that stage was using except [Sen. Amy Klobuchar] and me, unless they are willing to support what is right for this great nation, and that is supporting my campaign and the free things I promise to deliver.”

The senator from Massachusetts went on to note that she has funded her campaign via a “grassroots” effort by encouraging socialists to go to her website and “pitch in $5 because our democracy is at stake.” And the Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!

Our democracy is at stake if you put a socialist in the White House because in order to get her "plans" to work, you need to forcibly steal from those that have to give much to yourself and give some to those who have not.

If we’re going to be a country," Warren said,  "if we’re going to be a Democratic Party, where the only way you get the nomination is you either are a billionaire or you suck up to billionaires, then buckle up because we’re going to have a country that’s just going to work better and better for billionaires, and leave working people and everyone else behind."

Earlier in the debate, Warren had railed against billionaires self-funding campaigns, as well as the influence of PAC money, but like everything else woman who speak with fork tongue says, eventually changes.

And we are a country, Lizzy. We are by far, the most successful and freest country on Earth. We are not perfect but we're a hell of a lot better than second place.

Forked tongue Warren hasn’t always shunned billionaire donors. In 2019 she took about $10.4 million in "leftover funds from her 2018 Senate campaign to underwrite her 2020 run, a portion of which was raised from the same donor class she is now running against," reported the New York Times, a former newspaper.

Elizabeth "Dances Like Tree" Warren is full of buffalo dung.

The same Times piece noted that former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, who both "recruited donors" and donated to Warren's 2018 Senate re-election campaign, chose to support Joe Biden. "Can you spell hypocrite?" he reportedly stated in reference to Warren.

Alexandria Obviously-Comatose replied on her behalf: "H-i-p-p-o-k-r-i-t-t."

The "squad" confirmed that she was correct.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.





Tweet

Biden: "Buttigieg is not Barack Obama" AOC: "Everyone knows that"

AOC  looking for a dead bird

Former Vice President Joe Biden is fighting hard in his campaign to capture the Democratic primary for the presidential election. In his speeches, he has been going after the front-runner thus far, former mayor of South Bend, Indiana Pete Buttigieg. He says, "Buttigieg is no Barack Obama."

Congresswoman Alexandria Obviously-Comatose (D-NY) is supporting her fellow Comrade Bernard Sanders (I-VT) and thus, is attacking everyone who is not named Sanders including Israel and its inhabitants. She refused to allow Biden's remarks go unchallenged.

She wore eyeglasses so everyone would know how smart she is.

"Joe Biden says such obvious things," she began. "Everyone knows, even everyone who didn't study economics and Milton Keynes like I did, that Barack Obama is a black man and Pete Buttigieg is a white guy and therefore is racist. Obama is handsome and Buttigieg looks like an "Angry Magazine" character Paul Newman. If you're going to say things, get your facts correct. Duh."

Then she danced and cooked on Instagram.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.



Tweet

Biden, Biuttigieg and Bernie would have let Soleimani live and prosper

Dems: "An austere, religious man"

The "Three BB's": Biden, Buttigieg and Bernie said at the 8th Democratic Debate on ABC that they all would have allowed Iran's top terrorist Cassem Soleimani to live and prosper if any of them were the president of the United States because while he is the mastermind behind thousands of deaths, many which were Muslim, he seemed kind of austere and religious with a Sean Connery kind of look.

"Oy think he had nice eyes," Bernie Sanders said, referring to the man who, since 1998 commanded Iran's Quds Force (IRGC-QF), the terror arm of the regime tasked with planning and executing terror and military operations beyond Iran's borders.

Monica Hernandez asked Senator Sanders: What if he didn't have nice eyes--would you have then droned him?"

Sanders replied, "Only if he was getting funded by Wall Shhtreet bankers or other billionaires. I would also have drone them to, dammit." [Sanders stopped using 'millionaires' as evil, greedy, corrupt people once it went public that he's also a millionaire.]

"He posed no immediate danger to the United States," said Pete Buttigieg about the man whose Quds Force fueled destabilizing sectarian conflicts throughout the Middle East for decades and continues to wage a campaign of terrorism, assassinations, and violence.

ABC Moderator George Stephanopoulos asked Buttigieg, "If Soleimani posed a threat to your husband, would you have then droned him?"

"George, as much as I hate to say it, yes. Nobody screws with my husband," Buttigieg said emphatically.

Biden's response was slightly less controversial: "You know Muslims don't pray in churches like Christians," Joe said. "They use those round things called mosques. There are lots of mosques in the United States and as I stand here in Idaho, I plan to help all illegal immigrants." Turning to Adam Sexton of WMUR Biden smiled and added, "And you, young man, have a very sexy name. It reminds me of a ton of sex. Get it?"

Soleimani directed and guided the IRGC-QF terrorist attacks across six continents and inside the United States and his organization has been designated Soleimani as a Specially-Designated Global Terrorist. As Quds leader, Soleimani was directly responsible for arming, funding, and training proxy groups in Iraq, Syria, Bahrain, Lebanon, Yemen, and Afghanistan for starters.

"Cowabonga"

Operations carried out by the proxy groups have led to the deaths and suffering of TENS OF THOUSANDS, including hundreds and hundreds of Americans, civilian men, women and children included.

If anyone on planet Earth deserved to be "put down like a dog," Cassem Soleimani was the guy.

Even right before his death, orders given by that scumbag escalated Iran's campaign of violence and terrorism against Americans and our interests in the Middle East. He orchestrated a series of attacks against American forces in Iraq in the past several months, culminating in the rocket attack on December 27, 2019, which resulted in the death of an American citizen, wounded four American service members, and threatened the lives of many more American personnel, the State Department asserts.

"It was unfair. Soleimani wasn't such a bad guy
until Trump made him a bad guy"

General Soleimani also ordered the assault on the American Embassy in Baghdad. General Soleimani continued to command Iranian supported proxies in Iraq, which posed an escalating threat to the lives of Americans.
For his actions, Soleimani had been designated and sanctioned by the United Nations, European Union, and United States and is banned from international travel by United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231. In defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions, however, Soleimani continued to travel to Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon directing and coordinating lethal actions that pose a threat to regional peace and security.

Put any of these Three BBs in charge and it won't only be our economy collapsing.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

High School Teacher Reportedly Celebrated Limbaugh's Cancer Diagnosis: "It's Awesome That He's Dying"

On February 3rd, the country was told directly from the mouth of Rush Limbaugh, that he has late stage lung cancer. That is a very serious diagnosis and not a very good prognosis and any conservative who has ever listened to his radio broadcasts is saddened by the news.

But in the great state of Wisconsin, there is a high school teacher who is celebrating Rush's cancer diagnosis. That makes this teacher the poster boy for skivvy skidmarks.

Following Rush's announcement, Travis Sarandos, a high school English teacher in Milwaukee, vomited out a tweet celebrating the diagnosis, and wishing him a painful death, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

The tweet read:

Limbaugh absolutely should have to suffer from cancer. It’s awesome that he’s dying, and hopefully it is as quick as it is painful.

The Sentinel reports that the coward has since deleted his Twitter account, and that he has been placed on leave from the school.

According to the Daily Wire, the Milwaukee Public School director of communications and outreach, Shahree Douglas, said:

We are aware of Mr. Sarandos’ actions and can confirm that he was not speaking on behalf of any students or staff of Milwaukee High School of the Arts or Milwaukee Public Schools. The district is following policy and procedures related to personnel matters. Mr. Sarandos has been placed on leave pending further investigation.

Imagine if he was speaking on behalf of the students and staff. Imagine if Ms. Douglas actually admonished the scumcrumpet for the mean-spirited, ill-willed, disgusting wishes of this mentally ill mentor of the young minds he teaches. Imagine what this horrible person tells the teens in the privacy of the classroom that he might not say in public.

Politics is one thing, but this goes beyond party lines and reveals the darkness of the man's soul.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Pablo Escobar's hitman dies after losing battle with cancer

Bogota, Colombia -- Jhon Jairo Velásquez was a former hitman for cocaine kingpin Pablo Escobar. "Popeye" as his friends and loving parents called him, died in Colombia on Thursday after losing his battle with stomach cancer, prison authorities said. He was only 57 and the underworld will miss him.

Popeye had been hospitalized at the National Cancer Institute in Bogota where his days of "three hots and a cot" have ended. His days of killing people for profit are over. He had confessed to killing no less than 300 people as well as coordinating the deaths of thousands beyond that number for his boss' Medellin cartel in the 1980s and 1990s.

The bastard spent more than 20 years behind bars for plotting the murder of an ex-presidential candidate and was released in 2014 on parole.

After his release, he traded the bullet for the written word and even gained a bit of fame on YouTube where he angrily denounced leftist rebels and corrupt politicians, because if there was one thing he hated, it was unethical behavior. He aspired to run for a senate seat.

However, in 2017, Popeye found himself in deep trouble as authorities said they were seeking his arrest for violating parole after he was caught partying with a major drug trafficker wanted by the U.S. He was eventually captured in 2018 on charges of extortion.

Velásquez spoke of the murders he committed on Escobar's behalf as if he was discussing stock market strategy. In one TV interview he explained how he preferred to use a revolver when killing people and he enjoyed working "from the eyebrows up."

What a guy. He will be missed like toenail fungus.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Democrats call WaPo "fake news" for acquittal headline

The following is satire.

The Washington Post is being accused by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of being 'fake news' because they printed the headline: "Trump Acquitted."

Schumer, along with the rest of the fuming Democratic Party, say that the President of the United States cannot be acquitted because there were no witnesses at the Senate trial. This makes about as much sense as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez thinking she has to explain that one cannot pull themself up by their bootstraps because of the issue of gravity--not everyone is as dumb as she is.

In response to the Democratic Party, the Washington Post, which is an arm of the party, profusely apologized and fired the reporter who wrote the piece. "He'll never work in this town again," said editor in chief I.C. Nada.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet