Vox defends Islamist and calls Duncan Hunter a 'racist' while spouting racism

Vox.com, the website that pretends to help low-functioning readers "understand the news" has defended Ammar Campa-Najjar, the left-wing grandson of a legendary Palestinian terrorist who has taken donations from CAIR, an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Relief and Development for terror-financing, against attacks by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA).

Vox is calling the voters of the district racists because most would rather vote for a man who quit his job after the September 11 attacks and joined the United States Marine Corps, graduated from Officer Candidates School and served as a field artillery officer in the 1st Marine Division after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, completed a second tour in Fallujah, Iraq in 2004, then after his honorable discharge in 2005, remained in the Marine Corps Reserve, and served a third tour of duty during the War on Terrorism, than vote for the other guy Vox is promoting.

Rep. Duncan Hunter

Now there's a run-on sentence that you can sink your teeth into.

Campa-Najjar is challenging Hunter in the 50th District of California, a district that's traditionally Republican, which, in the obfuscated eyes of Vox writers, has therefore got to be racist, in spite of the fact that it isn't and that it has become more competitive since Hunter and his wife were indicted for alleged misuse of campaign funds.

Hunter vehemently protests his innocence and has called Campa-Najjar a "security risk" and ran a controversial ad accusing him of attempting to "infiltrate" the government. This has drawn criticism from the left and a variety of local and national media outlets, because the media is biased to the left and Hunter is a Republican.

Whipping out the trusty old race card, Vox's Tara Golshan defended Campa-Najjar writing that Hunter is using "the same kind of race-baiting Republicans have retreated to over and over again when they feel under siege."

Golshan coddles up to Bill

Then Golshan added: "This is the part of California where you see Confederate flags, and where many people only socialize with people who look like them."

So Golshan [who may have changed her name from 'Golsham'] cited zero evidence for her anti-White, racist claim, other than her stating that "Volunteers for Campa-Najjar's campaign will tell you they find themselves explaining that their candidate disavows terrorism."

No kidding. What else would one expect from a guy running for the House who has his background, his curious name changes, and his refusal to return the CAIR money or money from a Palestinian diplomat.

Explain that, please.

We need to read the writing on the wall

Apparently Golshan is unable to see the irony of her stereotyping hundreds of thousands of people as racists due to their geography--Southern California's wealthy coastal communities, while accusing Hunter of racism.

And Islam is not a race--it's a misogynistic, anti-Semitic, war-inciting ideology. The very fact that Campa-Najjar accepts campaign financing from CAIR and a Palestinian diplomat is very, very troubling.


Please click the "Subscribe" button at the top and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Media attacks Trump for attacking MS-13

President Trump gave a powerful speech on Friday vowing to "destroy the vile criminal cartel" MS-13. It disturbed some of the flowers of the media who proceeded to harshly criticize him for saying such nasty things about the thugs who kill, rape, rob and deal in drugs. 

This may be due to the fact that they're largely comprised of illegal immigrants who, because of this status, must be misunderstood and need to be given a chance at the American dream.

Trump's speech on Long Island, New York, where the gang members have gone on a violent rampage, brutally killing 17 people over the last 18 months, highlighted a plan to crack down on the gang violence and enforce immigration policies to prevent these scum wafers from illegally entering the United States.

"[MS-13 has] transformed peaceful parks and beautiful quiet neighborhoods into blood-stained killing fields. They're animals. We cannot tolerate as a society the spilling of innocent, young, wonderful vibrant people . . . " The audience cheered in approval, in spite of his sentence structure, because he actually wants to do something for the American people.

It sucks to spill people, and POTUS is very very keen on not spilling them.

Despite Mr. Trump's pledge to stop the killings and stop the spillings and keep America safe again from gang members, several leftist outlets was somehow making MS-13 "stronger" with his words.

How that's possible is anybody's guess, but the left would have something negative to say even if Trump cured Alzheimer's, "Now all those poor old folks who had Alzheimer's are going to remember all the terrible times in their lives. He should have left it alone."

Crappy News Network (CNN) said Trump's speech was "emboldening" MS-13, allowing the group to more readily recruit members. Yes, just like saying ISIS is a horrible, violent and disgusting organization will get people to turn to orthodox Islam and go on beheading sprees.

Neurotic CNN leftist Dan Lieberman interviewed two gang members, who one day hope to get their photos on Rolling Stone magazine like Tsarnaev, the Boston Marathon bomber. The gang members complained to Lieberman that "murders from MS-13 don't only hurt one family, but hurt both."

"I started growing up in that type of neighborhood. I didn't really get love from my family. Where I grew up, [MS-13] were there, almost all of them," one gang member told Lieberman. "They seemed like really nice people. They were there for me through tough times [like when he wanted to have a classmate killed with a bat for not letting him cheat from his answer sheet they killed the guy for him]."

One media outlet, Vox, tried to twist Trump's words to make it seem as if he believed all illegal immigrants were "subhuman."

It's really disgusting.

Slate's Jamell Bouie said Trump's words on MS-13 and illegal immigration are used to "make white people afraid."

So Jamell's default position, like most leftists who have no solutions to actually offer for any problem is to pull the race card.

Hopefully, liberals and independents will see through the bull crap, but I'm not counting on it anytime soon. They don't get the news the left-leaning media doesn't want them to see.

Tweet

Trump can't take the heat

There is no question that Donald Trump was a crucial factor in the viewership of the first GOP debate on Fox News. About 24 million people watched the debate and got to know the candidates because many wanted to see the "Trump Show."

In this way, "The Donald" has helped the Republican party garner more viewers than any cable news program in history. This can be attributed to Trump's entertainment factor and the anger many conservatives share against political correctness and the lies we constantly get from politicians.

Trump has tapped into our anger and he pulls no punches.

But there comes a point when substance is important. Voters want specifics about what the candidate can do for them and how they think. This gives us the chance to evaluate what's being said/promised, and come to intelligent conclusions.

In the debate, Fox News' Megyn Kelly asked Trump a specific question about his disparagement of women: "Mr. Trump, one of the things people love about you is you speak your mind and you don't use a politician's filter. However, that is not without its downsides, in particular, when it comes to women. You've called women you don't like, 'fat pigs,' 'dogs,' 'slobs,' and disgusting animals."

Trump quickly interjected, "Only Rosie O'Donnell." Everyone knows about their feud and how they sparred in the past.

But Megyn Kelly didn't allow him to get away with that reply. "No, it wasn't," she said. "Your Twitter account has several disparaging comments about women's looks. You once told a contestant on Celebrity Apprentice it would be a pretty picture to see her on her knees. Does that sound to you like the temperament of a man we should elect as president, and how will you answer the charge from Hillary Clinton, who is likely to be the Democratic nominee, that you are part of the war on women?"

Trump's comeback was to argue about political correctness being "the big problem."

"Frankly, what I say, and oftentimes it's fun, it's kidding," Trump said. "We have a good time. What I say is what I say, and honestly Megyn, if you don't like it, I'm sorry."

Trump told CNN's Don Lemon that Megyn Kelly had it out for him during the debate. "She gets out and she starts asking me all sorts of ridiculous questions. You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her . . . whatever."

The implication was clear. You don't have to be a deviant to know what he was going to refer to but decided that sometimes political correctness is the only way to go.

Vox, the far left ragblog, supported Trump and came out with what they referred to as a "complex theory" as to why Fox went after him.

It's not just about what happened at Thursday's debate. It's also about the way Fox News had, until Thursday, been inflating the Trump bubble, and the broader tension between Fox News's role as a ratings-obsessed cable network, an actual journalistic outlet, and one of the most important institutional actors in the Republican Party.

So, according to Vox, Trump was basically ambushed by Megyn Kelly. That would seem to imply that Kelly threw 'softballs' to the other candidates so that they would outdo The Donald on stage.

But alas, that wasn't the case. 

Kelly asked Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin about his strict abortion stance: "Would you really let a mother die, rather than having an abortion?" 

And while the death of a mother over a child is extremely rare, Walker dealt with the question admirably.

She asked Jeb Bush about saying that his brother's decision to get us into Iraq was a mistake: "To the families of those who died in that war . . . how do you look at them now and say your brother's war was a mistake?"

Bush dealt with it.

She asked Ohio Gov. John Kasich about his justifying the expansion of Medicaid in Ohio by arguing that he would be able to speak to Saint Peter at the pearly gates about it. "Why should Republican voters, who generally want to shrink government, believe you won't use your Saint Peter analogy to expand all government?" Then she asked him: "If you had a son or daughter who was gay or lesbian, how would you explain to them your opposition to same sex marriage?"

Kasich dealt with both questions quite well.

Kelly's first question to Dr. Ben Carson was directed at his readiness to be president based upon his previous lack of knowledge of government affairs. 

Carson dealt with it and came away from the debate by "sticking the landing." 

Kasich's questions, like those posed to Walker, Carson and Bush were tough, but they all dealt with them and handled them thoughtfully and well.

Trump also dealt with the question that Megyn Kelly posed, but he appeared arrogant, angry and seemed to take it personally, attacking Kelly for what she called him out on: misogyny. 

And like an angry kid who didn't want to clean his room, Trump complained to CNN that he was treated "unfairly."

I don't think calling politicians "stupid," and "losers" is going to continue to work for Trump. There's just so much traction one can get from anger without substance.

Anger without substance is like a hula-hoop for a snake--they don't have hips.

And Vox has as much credibility as Hillary Clinton's server story.



Tweet

Bad Deals: a legacy of incompetence

Touchdown!

While Europe is considering tougher immigration laws, the Obama administration has become almost lawless on the way it deals with this issue. The reasoning behind Europe's thinking is due to the rise of Islamic terrorism and the influx of Muslim jihadists.

It has gotten to the point where illegal aliens are demanding a safer way to cross the border into the USA. See the Gateway Pundit for more on this.

The thinking behind Obama's non-intervention/permissiveness on immigration policy has nothing to do with America's security, but everything to do with his socialist aspirations of fundamentally changing America, and his legacy he leaves behind. Unfortunately, the legacy will be the mess he leaves behind and may prove catastrophic once he's out of office and safely tucked away somewhere.

Worse than his failure to secure our borders, Obama's administration has declassified Iran and Hezbollah as terrorist entities. He stated on VOX that climate change is a bigger threat than terrorism. Perhaps he needs to actually take a course in meteorology before making this claim, but I'll take a 0.02 F degree increase over the last decade than a beheading. And for anyone to say "the science is in," doesn't know anything about the scientific method.

But let's get back to terrorism. 

Obama is working on declassifying the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) as a terrorist organization, which spits in the eyes of the FBI and UAE. It's likely that Obama needs to make this terror-funding group appear to be the good guys because he often meets with them in our White House. He also meets with the Council on American and Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim American Society (MAS). The names alone are oxymorons to what they actually wish to do to our country, which is, to destroy us from within.

Declassify terrorist organizations? It's hard to imagine how the definition of terrorism can be so flexible.

Obama is obviously more comfortable dealing with Iran and the MB than he is with our only true ally in the Middle East, Israel. We all know how much he and Netanyahu hate each other but is it also possible that Obama has caught the latest strain of the anti-Semite virus that has been plaguing the USA?

While CAIR makes crazy claims of Islamophobia, there is far more anti-Semitism being displayed all across America. But Islam likes to play the role of victim while simultaneously attacking you for victimizing them. 

There are many people in the Middle East who believe Obama is taking sides in the sectarian fighting and is refusing to deal or discuss human rights violations that are taking place. He is turning a blind eye all for the sake of a nuclear deal with Iran and this will cause some of the middle class to turn to the Gulf states for help protect their towns, while the rural class joins the Islamic State or Al Nusra to protect their families. 

So Obama will end his presidency with a legacy, but not the legacy he is hoping for. 

Tweet