ISIS Captures 88 Christians, Obama Still Baffled

They tried to sneak out of Libya last week but ISIS captured and kidnapped 88 Eritrean Christians in a people-smugglers' caravan. Obama blames the Crusades and past atrocities for the anger that ISIS harbors for Christians. He blames Israel for Islam's hatred for the Jewish people. 

He also claims that ISIS is not Islamic.

No mustache, like his prophet 

The Libya Herald newspaper reported that a convoy of migrants was ambushed by ISIS south of Tripoli last Wednesday.

Meron Estafanos, co-founder of International Commission on Eritrean Refugees, based in Sweden told the newspaper that the migrants included "about 12 Eritrean Muslims and some Egyptians. They put them in another truck and they put 12 Eritrean women Christians in a smaller pick-up." Estafanos did not say whether ISIS planned to sell them as sex slaves or behead them. Al Baghdadi needs to check the Koran to see which method is the most Islamic.

When ISIS initially stopped the truck they demanded that the Muslims on board identify themselves (but that had nothing to do with Islam, says Obama). 

Everyone claiming to be Muslim was then tested on the Koran and how they observe the religion of Islam. This was done to weed out Christians pretending to be Muslim in order not to be killed by ISIS for being an infidel.

But ISIS is not Islamic, says Obama.

As the truck drove away, about 9 men jumped off, trying to escape. Three apparently did but have yet to get out of Libya. The fates of the others is not known.

While Libya is the starting-point for migrants from the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa, there has been a greater ISIS presence there, as well as other terror groups, which increases the risk for Christians and all other un-believers of Islam.

But ISIS is not Islamic, according to Obama.

When asked in August of last year about the strategy the U.S. has to defeat ISIS, our so-called "president" said that he has no strategy. Now, ten months later, he is singing the same sorry song but now blames it on the Pentagon.

Of course, Obama is lying through his capped teeth. The Pentagon can quickly develop a military strategy to defeat 50,000 Islamic State jihadists before you can say, "Commence Fire!"

In fact, they say a strategy was available last year and they have a strategy now.

I believe the real problem Obama has about going after ISIS and other Islamic terror groups is that he has no stomach for war, particularly against Islamic fighters. This is probably due to his "Daddy issues," his personal history with Islam, and his apparent dislike of American exceptionalism.

Obama pretends that ISIS is not Islamic and we know that he has read the Koran as a madrassa student in Indonesia, where he said the call to prayers was the most beautiful sound he has ever heard. 

But ISIS jihadists are the most orthodox Muslims today. They follow their prophet to the letter with beheadings, kidnapping of non-Muslim women to sell or use as sex slaves, and their hatred of Jews, gays, Christians and all other people on earth, as well as dogs, because Mohammed hated dogs.

Yes, Obama has begun to "fundamentally change America." He has taken a "balls-to-the-wall muscle car" known as the United States of America, and made us a pogo-stick.

If America gets through the rest of this clown's term without a major catastrophe unleashed by one of our enemies, we can count ourselves lucky. 


Tweet

No Strategy or No Clue?

President Barack Hussein Obama admitted he doesn't yet have a "complete strategy" to defeat ISIS (or, as he calls them, ISIL, because he has to be oppositional on everything that matters) and blames it on the Iraqis, in part, and the Pentagon. He is never at fault for his ineptitude, and if there was a way he could somehow nail George W. for this, he would. 

"Who needs strategy when I got beer?"

Back in August 2014 he first admitted that he had no strategy to defeat ISIS, so nothing has changed except for those he now blames. 

"When a finalized plan is presented to me by the Pentagon, then I will share it with the American people," the empty suit said. "We don't yet have a complete strategy."

By "complete strategy" Mr. Obama was referring to "any strategy to win." He was given several strategies from the Pentagon but refused to take action against ISIS back then, possibly fearing he might accidentally kill someone he is close to or related to.

Obama spoke about the ISIS situation at a press conference during a break at the G7 summit in Germany. After listening to his prattle, it became clear that
 a) he has no idea of what he is talking about, or 

b) if he had any idea of what he's talking about he is either purposefully trying to allow ISIS to gain more territory and establish a caliphate, or he needs to be impeached and replaced with someone who actually knows how to win a war and not simply leave and declare to the American public that you ended the war.

As it stands, Obama seems to be thinking about adopting a new strategy for speeding up the training and equipping Iraqi security forces so they can be on the front lines against ISIS and provide the terrorist group with American equipment once again. "We're reviewing a range of plans for how we might do that," the suspected Islamic sympathizer said. 

A U.S. official explained to the media that Obama was only talking about optimizing the train-and-equip mission, "including integration of Sunni fighters," and stressed that this was in no way an "overall strategy." In other words, Obama is clueless on how to defeat ISIS. In fact, according to him, they aren't even Muslims.

Michael Short (no relation to Martin, but almost as funny) spoke to the comment Obama made last August saying "the fact he still doesn't have a final plan for the deteriorating situation in Iraq is unacceptable."

Except that it has, so far, been acceptable because nothing is being done to not accept it.

Regarding his recent statement at the G7, a military official was upset with Obama's claim that he was waiting for options from the Pentagon. "What the f**k was that? We have given him lots of options, he just hasn't acted on them." 

Perhaps military options upset Obama's fragile stomach and reflect his lack of testicular fortitude. 

But Pentagon lackey Col. Steve Kissup Warren backed up Obama's statement that he was still awaiting a "finalized plan' from the Pentagon. He added that the SecDef Ash Carter has gotten together a group of "experts" to talk about possible things they could do to "increase support" to Iraqi forces. 

Warren gave no timeline when a "finalized plan" would be presented to Obama, but don't hold your breath.

What needs to be done is not something that requires a group of Mensa meeting attendees need to be involved with--Col. Ralph Peters said it nicely: "Kill them all and then kill their goats."


Tweet

Lack of Jobs the Reason ISIS Beheads Folks

War strategist and State Department spokes-cretin Marie Harf has a way to defeat the Islamic State jihadis claiming, "We cannot kill our way out of this war," we need to give Islamic State jihadis a shot at a good job.

Seriously, she said that on MSNBC to Chris "Tingles" Matthews, the guy who goes gaga over Obama, and even he found it difficult to digest. But the truth is, both sides  of the aisle have tried to propagate the bull crap that poverty causes people to become terrorists and paying off Islamic countries will rid the world of terrorism and the radical religious belief that Islam has held dear for 1400 years.

Like it did with the 911 hijackers? Like bin Laden, the hijackers all came from wealthy families and had better educations than most of their countrymen. It wasn't money or jobs.

We tried pumping money into Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan, and see how well that turned out for us. It's about the religion, stupid. These "folks" are fighting for Allah, for their religious beliefs, and not because they want a job parking cars instead of blowing them up.

What other way is there to win a war than to "kill our way out of it?" We did it in WW2 when the Japanese realized our A-Bombs would kill them all. In fact, the A-Bomb saved more lives than it killed because it ended a prolonged and bloody war.

Jihadists aren't saying to themselves, "Gee, if only I had a job, I wouldn't be hacking this Christian's head  off and I could go to Disneyland with my wives and our fifteen children."

It's insulting to anyone who has even a small inkling of what motivates the Islamic State. Marie Harf, like Jonathan Gruber, thinks the American voters are stupid. They happen to be talking about their own party because conservatives haven't bought into their propaganda since Day 1.

Matthews told Harf (rhymes with barf) "if I were ISIS, I wouldn't be afraid right now--nothing we do right now seems to be directed at stopping this," to which the woman who gives blonds a bad name responded: "I think there are a few stages here. Right now what we're doing is trying to take their leaders and their fighters and their fighters off the battlefield in Iraq and in Syria, that's really where they flourish. We're killing a lot of them and we're going to keep killing more of them, so are the Egyptians, so are the Jordanians they're in this fight with us. But we cannot win this war by killing them; we cannot kill our way out of this war. We need, in the longer term, medium and longer term, to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups, whether it's lack of opportunity for jobs . . . "

ISIS Job Lines

Even Chrissy knew she was trying to blow smoke up his nether regions. He cut her off and said, "we're not going to be able to stop that in our lifetime, or fifty lifetimes. There's always going to be poor people, there's always going to be poor Muslims, and as long as there are poor Muslims, the trumpet's blowing, they'll join. We can't stop that, can we?"

Harf's response was sadly laughable. "We can work with countries around the world to help improve their governance, we can hep them build their economies, so they can have job opportunities for these people. You're right, there is no easy solution in the long-term to preventing and combating violent extremism, bit if we can help countries work at the root causes of this, what makes these 17-year-old kids pick up an AK-47, instead of trying to start a business?" And so on and so forth, yadda, yadda, yadda.

Marie Harf is another example of people who are either ignorant of Islam or willfully deceiving the American public. 

But the public is not as gullible as it once was. According to a recent CNN poll,

most Americans believe Obama is handling the Islamic State as well as he handles a three-point shot from half court at the buzzer. 

Fifty-seven percent disapprove of his handling the ISIS threat, which is a significant decline since late September when it was 49%.

Is there anything this administration is doing that is working well?

Tweet

The "No Strategy" Strategy?

Austrians do not speak "Austrian," there are not 57 United States, and you can't "manage" a terrorist organization. And here's a little secret: the "p" and the "s" are silent in the word "corpsman."

Obama is an empty suit. He is as much of a genius as Harry Reid is a baritone. 

ISIS has done everything George W. Bush warned us about back in 2007 and still Obama emptied Iraq of all U.S. troops, leaving the door wide open for the influx of terror, and now he has no real strategy on how to deal with it. In fact, when it comes to foreign affairs, he just isn't all that interested.

But when it comes to politics, Obama goes to the head of the class. He spoke at a news conference in Wales today at the end of a meeting with our NATO allies. Obama changed his previous tune of "managing ISIS" and vowed to "degrade and ultimately defeat" them. "We are going to degrade and ultimately defeat ISIL, the same way we have gone after Al Qaeda," he said. By "we" he was referring to our brave men and women in the military that comprise not him. 

So first he said that our goal was to destroy ISIS, then he said we would "shrink" it to a "manageable" problem. Now you know where Debbie Wasserman Schultz gets the walking back lessons.

John "Rugs" Kerry said on Friday that there is no strategy to "contain" the group, to which the Obamanator agreed, saying that you can't dismantle a group that's running roughshod over the land, so our goal has to be to "dismantle" it. To that end, he has no strategy, which might in itself be a decoy strategy, but I doubt it--Obama just isn't that bright.


Tweet