Joe claims he won't pardon Hunter: believe him this time?

POTUS seen here picking his nose

It's hard to tell when President Joe Biden is lying because it's hard to decipher the sounds emitted from his mouth. So when the White House's incompetent black lesbian Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre [KJP] speaks on Joe's behalf, it's best to wait and see what ends up being the truth.

KJP was her usual adamant self when she claimed that Joe's drug-addled, whoring, bag-man son, Hunter, would not be granted clemency by the President. This comes one day following his rejected probation-only plea deal on gun charges and taxes that U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika issued after she realized Hunter's lawyers were trying to play her. 

“Is there any possibility that the president would end up pardoning his son?” a reporter asked the affirmative action Press Secretary at her regular briefing.

“No,” KJP replied, uncharacteristically responding to the question with a related answer.

When the same Fox News reporter tried to ask a follow-up question, KJP snapped, “I just said no — I just answered” and called on a different journalist, but not the guy from Africa who she always refuses to call on but someone who would ask easier questions.

The way the U.S. Constitution is worded, a president could pardon anyone they want, and in our geriatric president's case, that would be his son. However, if he did, that would cause a huge political blowback.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (RINO-CA) has made comments this week about a possible impeachment inquiry into the President's role in Hunter's foreign business dealings such as those in China, Mexico, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine, where Hunter did not register as a foreign agent as the law requires, and where he paid off someone referred to as the "big guy."

A reporter from the far-left Salon asked a question to which KJP claimed that Hunter did not receive "favorable treatment" from his father's Justice Department, and amazingly, nobody rolled on the floor laughing their ass off.

He borrowed Dad's aviator glasses

In fact, two IRS whistleblowers revealed that Biden-appointed US Attorneys in Washington, DC and Los Angeles blocked charges against Hunter leading to what assistant US attorney Leo Wise repeatedly admitted in court Thursday was an unprecedented plea deal.

The Salon "reporter" asked KJP, “Can you state categorically that the administration has neither sought nor received favorable treatment from the DOJ for any investigation into the president, members of the administration, his family or former President Donald Trump?”

“Absolutely not,” the incompetent Press Secretary responded. “The Department of Justice is independent, the president respects the rule of law, he’s been saying that since he was before [sic] president and that will remain the case,” she said, hoping anyone would believe the load she was shoveling.

Joe Biden repeatedly interacted with his son’s foreign business partners in spite of him lying that he never was involved with any of Hunter's business deals.

Hunter’s plea deal to two tax misdemeanors and a gun possession felony would have been expunged after two years had the judge fallen for the gambit his lawyers tried to trick the judge into signing.

The sides will appear again in court in 30 days after filings on next steps.

Tweet

O'Rourke would punish churches that don't support gay marriage

Democratic dullard Robert Francis O'Rourke [an Irishman who uses the name "Beto" to make himself sound Hispanic] has little regard for the U.S. Constitution. He admitted that he would disregard the Second Amendment and take away guns from law abiding citizens.

More recently, during a CNN LGBTQetc town hall event on Thursday, O'Rourke said that if he somehow won the cosmic lottery and won became president that he would take away tax-exempt status from churches that follow their scripture and thus refuse to support same-sex marriage.

This is an example of how progressivism is the new religion of the left and is intolerant of opposing ideologies, free speech and the right to defend oneself.

“This is from your LGBTQ plan and here’s what you write — this is a quote: ‘Freedom of religion is a fundamental right, but it should not be used to discriminate,'” CNN's cretin and gay host Don Lemon said. “Do you think religious institutions like colleges, churches, charities — should they lose their tax-exempt status if they oppose same-sex marriage?”

O’Rourke answered: “There can be no reward, no benefit, no tax break for anyone or any institution, any organization in America, that denies the full human rights and the full civil rights of every single one of us. So as president, we’re going to make that a priority, and we are going to stop those who are infringing upon the human rights of our fellow Americans.”

Fortunately for America, O'Rourke has as much chance of winning the presidency as Rashida Tlaib has of buying Israeli savings bonds after planting a tree in Israel while denouncing Hamas.

Who the hell does O'Rourke think he is?

For him, it's okay to deny the human and civil rights of those who follow a particular religion. How quickly he is to condemn Christians while being unwilling to speak about Islam's similar and even more radical beliefs about homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

The left has lost its tongue when it comes to Islam's treatment of gays. In many Islamic countries, being gay, lesbian, queer or transgender is a death sentence if caught. But the left never seems to discuss that situation, only the fact that Christians, who would serve the LGBTQ community but would not serve for a same-sex wedding, should be punished for refusing to go against their religion.

Even the Trump-hating Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) slammed O'Rourke for his "bigoted nonsense."

“This bigoted nonsense would target a lot of sincere Christians, Jews, and Muslims. Leaders from both parties have a duty to flatly condemn this attack on very basic American freedoms,” Sasse wrote. “This extreme intolerance is un-American. The whole point of the First Amendment is that…everyone is created with dignity and we don’t use government power to decide which religious beliefs are legitimate and which aren’t.”

It's clear that if O'Rourke had his way [which is as likely as a Texan being struck by lightning three times in succession at noon in Times Square on a sunny day] there would eventually be no Christian, Jewish, Muslim or religious academic institutions left standing in America. The only "religion" would be Communism, but they probably will not call it that--they'll use a catchy term like Democratic socialism.

Professor Denny Burk wrote on Twitter: “Beto O’Rourke calls for Christian churches to lose their tax-exempt status unless they endorse gay marriage. This draconian assault on the First Amendment is now the MAINSTREAM view within the Democratic party. This could bankrupt many churches and religious institutions because it would dissuade contributions. Many churches would lose their property as a result of being unable to pay property taxes — especially in big cities. This is truly draconian and unconstitutional.”

Burk is exactly correct.

Even left-wing journalists that work for far-left publications found the cretin's comments to be repulsive, possibly because he panders to his two supporters: his dental hygienist and his barber.

Slate writer Ruth Graham tweeted: “I’m late on this, but it’s astounding, and it’s exactly where conservatives have been warning that progressives are heading.”

Many in O’Rourke’s party view him as a moron and have called him a loser publicly.

Former Chicago Democratic Mayor Rahm Emanuel, a loser of another kind, essentially said the same thing about O’Rourke last year.

“If Beto O’Rourke wants to go and run for president, God bless him,” Emanuel said. “He should put his hat in and make his case. But he lost. You don’t promote a loser to the top of the party.”

Rahm was referring to the mainstream media when discussing the idea of promoting a candidate, because real journalism has been dead and buried for years now and the media has become an extension of the Democratic Party.

Coming soon: Beto's proctology appointment on video.

Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not. But seriously, please check out the ads as this is my source of generating revenue. And you can also see my blog on the Times of Israel.

Tweet

Factophobia: a leftist disorder

Boycotting the House Select Committee on Benghazi by Democrats is a clear example of Factophobia. The liberals don't know the facts but they know that they don't want to know them. Factophobia is the same disorder that Rutgers low-information liberals suffer from as well.

Rutgers planned to have Condoleezza Rice give a speech at the commencement program and have previously had Hillary Clinton speak at the "university." Hillary appeared at Rutgers in 2007 and was accepted with open arms and closed minds by students and faculty alike. But with the announcement that Condi was scheduled to be the speaker at their commencement, the little anarchists went ballistic and protested loudly. 

The hypocrites blamed Condi for supporting the war in Iraq, but somehow forgot to blame Hillary for supporting the same war with her vote. Somehow they were able to dismiss Hillary's decision but not Condi's; perhaps they're racists, a term they love to throw out there.

The little anarchists even made fun of her name, as you can see from the sign they made.

The Rutgers leftists, and leftists in general, are as tolerant as is the religion of peace, good ole Islam. The funny thing is, when a gay leftist or female leftist sides with Islam (e.g., marching against Israel in favor of the Palestinians), they have no clue of what it would be like for them to live in an actual Muslim country. Well, the gay person wouldn't live too long upon arrival if he or she were openly gay.

But back to Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton.

The Daily Targum, Rutgers' largest school paper, had urged the school administration to not allow Dr. Rice to speak there due to her "questionable politics." It seriously sounds like Rutgers is afraid of things that are open to question. That may be a problem when it comes to "higher learning" in real academia, and heaven forfend, it might actually open the floor to a debate where not everybody wins a trophy.

If you compare the accomplishments of both Condi and Hillary as Secretary of State, it's easy to see who actually has real ones. Mail Online discussed this and shows an interview with Jen Psaki. She discusses Hillary's accomplishments as Secretary of State on video, and you can judge for yourself.

Even more interesting is the Capitol City Project interview where even Hillary is thrown at a loss as to her accomplishments. But never fear Hillary lovers; she has won more awards than practically any other human being on the planet. The only award she is currently striving for is "Best Dressed Woman in a Polyester Suit Award."

When it comes to Condi's accomplishments, even Slate's Fred Kaplan had to concede to her. Of course, he couldn't do it without attacking George W. Bush, but that's to be expected of a Marxist loving propaganda machine like Slate.

So the truth is evident about Rutgers and their cowardice. The university administration didn't cancel Dr. Rice's appearance, she cancelled herself. She said, "Commencement should be a time of joyous celebraton for the graduates and their families. Rutgers' invitation to me to speak has become a distraction for the university community at this very special time."

Condoleezza Rice isn't a special kind of person because she opened nuclear negotiations with North Korea, or because she crafted the terms of the UN resolution to investigate war crimes in Sudan, among many other accomplishments.

No, Dr. Rice is special because she has more class than all of the leftists at Rutgers combined. And she has more class than the Rutgers administration, who did nothing to change the outcome.

Undoubtedly, it is Rutgers' loss, but they're too clueless to know that.

Tweet