Showing posts with label Michael Bloomberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Bloomberg. Show all posts

Friday, April 18, 2025

"Friends of Bernie Sanders" spent $200,000 on jets to fight the elusive Oligarchy



Imagine the spectacle of comrades Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, those self-styled scourges of the elite, soaring above the toiling masses in a private jet—a gleaming chariot of hypocrisy that burns through $15,000 an hour and pollutes the skies equivalent to a medium-size village. This, we are told by Fox News, was their chosen mode of transport for their so-called “Fighting Oligarchy Tour” along the West Coast. Fighting oligarchy, it seems, requires the kind of opulence that would make a Gilded Age robber baron blush.

The Washington Free Beacon, digging through the financial entrails of Sanders’ campaign, reveals a princely sum of over $200,000 spent on private jets in recent months. “Friends of Bernie Sanders, which manages the Fighting Oligarchy Tour, contracted three firms that charter jets: Cirrus Aviation Services, N-Jet, and Ventura Jets,” the Beacon reports, with payments to these firms gobbling up nearly 75 percent of the campaign’s transportation budget. 

A modest $63,830 went to commercial flights—presumably for the plebs in the entourage—while $41,000 was splashed on lodging and a cool $248,245 on event production. One wonders if the irony of such extravagance ever pierced the bubble of their righteous indignation. In other words, who are the oligarchs?

The National Republican Congressional Committee’s Ben Petersen put it with deadly bluntness: “Champagne socialists Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez demand Americans surrender their pick-up trucks, air conditioning and meat from the luxe leather seats of their private jets that cost more per hour than most Americans earn in months. Their hypocrisy is staggering.” 

Staggering, indeed. This is the same Sanders who, in 2014, thundered against the fossil fuel industry, writing, “The fossil fuel industry is destroying the planet with impunity and getting rich while doing it. That must end.” Yet here he is, guzzling carbon like a robber baron at a banquet, all while preaching austerity to the proletariat.

Sanders’ rhetoric is as unrelenting as it is unreflective. “We will not accept a rigged economy where working people struggle while billionaires become richer,” he declared in his Brooklyn accent on Tuesday, taking a swipe at Elon Musk and the “billionaire class.” This from a man who, as Michael Bloomberg pointed out during the 2020 Democratic primary debate in Nevada, is “the best-known socialist in the country” and “a millionaire with three houses.” Bloomberg’s retort was a rapier thrust: “What did I miss here?” 

Nothing, Mr. Bloomberg. You missed nothing.

Sanders’ own words betray him. In that same debate, he proclaimed, “We are living in many ways in a socialist society right now,” before launching into a paean to “democratic socialism for working people, not billionaires, health care for all, educational opportunities for all.” 

Fine words Bernie, but how they ring hollow when uttered from the plush confines of a private jet. The late Bernie Marcus, co-founder of Home Depot, saw through the charade. “Don’t bring up Bernie Sanders, because that’s a red flag in front of me,” he once said. “He is the enemy of every entrepreneur that’s ever going to be born in this country and has been born in the past.”

And so, the Sanders and Alexandria Obviously-Commie roadshow rolls on, a carnival of contradictions. They rail against the excesses of capitalism while indulging in its most ostentatious trappings. They decry the billionaire class while living that lifestyle. It's a performance of such breathtaking audacity that one can only marvel at the sheer gall of it all.

I call it 'The Audacity of Dope."

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure, it's your call.


Wednesday, January 29, 2020

Beto blows it for his Texas leftist candidate

Beto changes a flat tire
The Senate election and presidential candidate loser Robert Francis [aka Beto] O'Rourke, a guy who had to adopt a fake Hispanic name to try winning their vote, didn't do any better with his support for Democrat Eliz Markowitz in her race against Republican Gary Gates for state House District 28.

It was a blowout on Tuesday for Gates who polled 58% of the vote to Markowitz's paltry 42% in final, but still unofficial results, according to the Associated Press.

This victory for Gates comes in spite of the other endorsements by leftists like billionaire Michael Bloomberg, and multi millionaire liar Sen, Elizabeth "Dances Like Tree" Warren (D-MA).
Eliz plays a guitar
Regarding O'Rourke, the AP wrote: “Beto O’Rourke practically made the district a second home after ending his own presidential campaign in November, spending weekends knocking on doors in Katy’s affluent neighborhoods. One national Democratic group called Forward Majority, which is spending millions of dollars nationwide to flip GOP-controlled state houses, says it has spent $400,000 on the race, at least four times what the group spent on any other Texas district in 2018.”
Beto also plays guitar
Democrats and the media had tried to claim that this was a bellwether race for this November that this race was going to help them push their narrative that Texas was turning purple. Hopefully they are right about this bellwether prediction as it seems that red is the new purple.

“It’s the symbolism,” said Mark Jones, a political scientist at Rice University. “It would help Democrats with the narrative that Texas is turning purple.”
Beto shreds on skateboard
Abbott’s office published a video on Twitter showing Gates celebrating the victory late on Tuesday night.

Abbott took a shot at O’Rourke earlier in the evening, writing: “Wait. Beto math was that if he won or was close in a House district then he could help a democrat win. He came within 3% in this district. Early returns show the Republican winning by about 18% Beto math doesn’t work. All of that $ was incinerated.”

Markowitz tried to do verbal calisthenics after her bellwether double digit loss, pretending somehow that it is a win. This makes perfect Democrat sense, if losing is the new winning. She bloviated that Texas Democrats had established momentum heading into November. If by momentum she means staggering losses, then she makes a good point.
Beto goes to the dentist
“We knew this election would be tough — it’s not easy to take on Republicans in an off-year special election, but we made this seat competitive in a way it’s never been before,” Markowitz bloviated. “We head into November having established a movement for change and that movement will continue across the state of Texas through November. This is a grassroots campaign dedicated to putting people over special interests, and we’ve built a network that will last for years to come.”

And by grassroots, if Markowitz means that she is smoking grass, then point well taken.

Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel responded to the blowout win by writing on Twitter:
“Big GOP win in a TX special election! Dems spent $1M+ and called #HD28 a “bellweather” [sic] for 2020. National Dems like Biden, Bloomberg, Beto & Warren went all-in. Congratulations @GatesforTexas , @RSLC , and our hundreds of grassroots volunteers who got involved!”
It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.




Saturday, January 23, 2016

Bloomberg may throw your soda cup in the ring

Michael Bloomberg, billionaire, former New York City mayor, and owner of Bloomberg News, a media outlet, is thinking  about running against another billionaire real estate developer and TV show entertainer from New York City if Trump gets the nomination. It looks like that's what's going to happen, but hey, ya never know. 

Of course, Bloomberg will also need to run against people on the left, notably a woman who may be indicted for disobeying the law regarding the Espionage Act, and who has logged more miles than any other Secretary of State while doing nothing for the country, and whose family foundation funds may have been used illegally and to buy political influence for foreign countries.

Another leftist Bloomberg will have to run against if he truly wants to become POTUS is a socialist who, as a New Hampshire senator, has done very little with his time in the Senate and who believes in the possibility of raising taxes on Americans to 90%.

The other leftist was mayor of a failed Baltimore, Maryland, then governor of the same state. He is as relevant to this election cycle as a yo-yo is to a flounder.

Like Donald Trump, Bloomberg says he will finance his campaign with his own money and has already commissioned a poll and ordered his advisers to start drafting plans, but he will likely wait to see what happens with the Iowa caucus on February 1st.

Bloomberg, a notorious flip-flopper has run as a Democrat, a Republican, and would now run as an Independent.

Ted Cruz (R-Tx) is a close second to Donald Trump, while Bernie Sanders (D-NH) is making a "shhtrong" bid for the Democratic nomination. 

Like Sanders, Bloomberg is pre- "The Howdy Doody Show," which makes them both quite old.

Changin' with time
While Bloomie's odds at actually winning the election is on par with winning the lottery without buying a ticket, he would probably screw things up for both parties in the general election. As a person who has screwed up New York City by regulating everything possible, that suits him just fine.

One would think that owning an entire media platform would disqualify a person from becoming president, but the times, they are a changin'.

Although no Independent ever was elected to POTUS, Bloomberg, a supporter of highly restrictive gun laws might sway disaffected voters on both sides of the aisle.

If, in fact, he were to get elected, it would be a blow to the Constitution and our civil liberties. 

C'mon folks, the guy put restrictions on the size of soda pop servings allowed in restaurants, and like Moochelle Obama, would even try to control the food we're allowed to eat, and then there's that little issue about the Second Amendment.


Thursday, June 14, 2012

Banning Choice

16 oz. can get you "Five"
Michael Bloomberg is banning the sale of 16 ounce soft drinks in restaurants in order to help fight obesity in New York City. In order to stay fat, gluttons will have to order two 8 ounce soft drinks to keep up the forbidden calories, but I suspect they might go for a couple of 10 ounce drinks just for spite. Maybe they'll have to ban all soft drinks. Just as long as they leave marijuana alone, Bloomberg is okay with it, like he is with donuts as he celebrated "Donut Day" in New York right after making the soda ban announcement.


Now there is talk of banning other fattening foods like popcorn. What about ice cream and those deadly high in fat, low in satiation, croissants? What about sugary cereals and donuts (what will the cops do)? What about things that help us maintain our portly figures like television and public transit--we should be forced to walk or bike to work.  And since the reason for the fight against obesity is ostensibly for health reasons, why not ban low SPF sunscreens and only allow 40 or higher SPF's to be sold? How about banning tight jeans for men as they inhibit the reproduction of viable sperm cells? Milk is high in cholesterol so why not ban it too? And second cups of coffee should land you in jail for nothing less than a month, while candy should land you in the slammer with serious hard time.


I say we ban toilet paper too, because it is a fact that in over 95% of all cancer-related deaths in western society, the deceased was a regular user of toilet paper--the correlation is indisputable.


Bloomberg: "King of New York" 
Or maybe the best solution is to get rid of politicians like Bloomberg, a little man with a big ego who thinks he has the right to tell us what we can or cannot eat because he knows it's for our own good. Or maybe he's just into the power surge he gets when he dictates from his bully pulpit.  He wants to be your mommy just like Obama wants the government to be your nanny. Why is it that the rich and powerful want the rest of us to share our wealth and be dependent upon the government in aspects of our lives that is none of their damned business when they aren't willing to give up what they have?


Socialism doesn't bring the lowest up to the socio-economic middle, it brings the middle down to the bottom, while the rich stay rich and powerful. And a nanny state doesn't help you, it makes you dependent and weak as it weakens the nation where everyone is a winner and nobody is a winner--except for the politicians and the real people in power who put them there--the Soro's of the world.


Please tell me what you think in the comments section.



If you want a great read about modern day terrorism and suspense, my latest novel, Jihad Joe, is now available both in soft cover and as an Ebook--see the links below. 

     



Thursday, June 23, 2011

Superman is a Conservative

Watching over the RNC
In 1932, American writer Jerry Siegel and Canadian-born American artist, Joe Shuster, teamed up and created a comic book character the world knows as Superman. Although the original usage of this moniker came from Friedrich Nietzsche, it's unlikely these men, both from Jewish immigrant families, got the inspiration for the character from the man whose work inspired Adolf Hitler.  Raised in Kansas by a farmer and his wife, Superman was brought up with a strong moral compass and clear American values.  It's interesting, however, that Siegel and Shuster were left-leaning liberals and Superman was originally created as a social activist fighting dishonest businessmen and crooked politicians. Imagine what Superman would have done to Bernie Madoff and Michael Bloomberg.

If Superman were really a flesh and blood super-hero, he would find himself engaged in chasing down politicians and bad guys like Bill and Hill Clinton, JFK, Eliot Spitzer, Anthony Weiner, Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, and a whole slew of lefties too numerous to mention. He would be able to fly at the speed of light, go back in time, and determine with certainty whether or not B. Hussein Obama really was born in Hawaii and was an actual Christian. Superman could check out who funded Obama's Harvard education, and what he wrote for his college thesis at Columbia. He might even get to see what Michelle Obama did all of her "adult lifetime" before she was proud, for the first time, of America.  He would even stop the Islamization of the west.

But sadly, Superman does not exist. He is a fiction originally created by the left; but there is no doubt in my mind, if Superman did exist, he would be a Republican.              

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.
click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

Alleged UFC White House Terror Plot Exposes Yet Another Security Nightmare

Just when you thought the threat environment surrounding President Trump couldn't get any crazier, federal investigators say they disrup...