CBS pressured into returning Catherine Herridge's files

After CBS fired their best journalist, Catherine Herridge, they seized her files, all her records and her computers. She was in the midst of pursuing several stories regarding Joe Biden and his family, as well as other investigations. 

When Herridge's union, SAG-AFTRA heard what CBS did, they condemned their actions and demanded they return her files. The union said that this was a dangerous precedent and was a threat to the First Amendment.

The House Judiciary Committee Chair demanded to know who was behind her termination and all the documents related to her firing/the seizing of her files. 

They wanted answers by March 1st. 

CBS was taken by surprise by the blowback they received and released a statement that claimed they never actually "seized" her files and went on to claim that her office had been secured and they respected her wishes not to go through her files, and pinky-swore they didn't do anything that they got caught doing, and the cookie jar was already broken, so don't tell mom.

According to sources, who wished to remain alive, someone at CBS only boxed up Herridge's personal belongings but not her files. What does that tell you?

Obviously they were forced into walking it back and have now turned over her files, as the New York Post reports.

“Catherine Herridge’s union representative picked up her materials this morning,” a CBS News rep said on Monday, pretending it was all standard operating procedure, hoping nobody would notice.

“This was a standard HR conversation about materials in her office, which Catherine then referred to her union representative,” a spokesperson claimed.

Herridge reportedly faced "roadblocks from higher-ups" in her coverage of Hunter Biden, the drug-addled, whore mongering son of Joe Biden, and this put her on the wrong side of CBS president Ingrid Ciprian-Matthews. The question is, was the CBS reverse moonwalk about the Biden crime family or about her wrongful termination?

As of now, it isn't known who dropped the hatchet down on Herridge; it may have come from Ciprian-Matthews, CBS News CEO Wendy McMahon or CBS CEO George Cheeks. However, a top CBS source said that neither Cheeks or McMahon were involved in the decision to hold onto the files.

As they say in Iran, "heads will roll," if it's discovered, because the public will demand it.

If CBS fails to provide this information requested by the House Judiciary Committee by March 1st, they may get subpoenas to further explain their tardiness.

Tweet

CBS finally admits Hunter's laptop is real after the NY Post broke the story over 2 years ago

It took CBS "News" 769 days since the NY Post broke the story about Hunter Biden's laptop and the authenticity of the data found on its hard drive. When the Post broke the news Jack Dorsey's Twitter social media website and Facebook refused to have it posted and Joe Biden ended up winning the election. Many people said had they known about the laptop and its contents, they would have not voted for Dementia Joe.

So on Monday CBS "News" said it confirmed the authenticity of the data after The Post first revealed its contents ahead of the 2020 presidential election and the mainstream media refused to carry the story.

CBS correspondent Catherine Herridge, formerly of Fox News, reported that she received a copy of Hunter’s hard drive from former Delaware computer repairman John Paul Mac Isaac, and that Minnesota computer scientists led by former Secret Service computer crimes expert Mark Lanterman said the files appeared legitimate. Wow! Who'd a thunk?

Lanterman’s firm determined that the laptop’s contents accumulated over the course of time, as would be expected, and that there was no evidence that the documents were altered by outsiders.CBS news correspondent Catherine Herridge reported that she was able to confirm the authenticity of data in Hunter Biden’s former laptop.

Herridge did not specifically say which documents from the laptop were determined to be authenticated, including an infamous May 2017 email that described a 10% cut for the “big guy” as part of her reporting — but said that two sources confirmed to her that Joe Biden was the person identified as the “big guy.”

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Critical Race Theory, ignorance, The New York Times, and bovine flatulence. You also help me and the orphans. Thanks.

* * *

But let's not believe for one moment that anything is going to come of this. The Bidens seem to be untouchable.

“Two of Hunter Biden’s former business partners, including Tony Bobulinski, who received the email, told CBS News that the 10% ‘held by H for the big guy’ was shorthand for 10% held by Hunter for his father,” Herridge reported. 

Tweet

AG Barr slams Mueller, calls Steele dossier very troubling and more

Attorney General Bill Barr spoke with CBS's Catherine Herridge on Thursday about the FBI's use of the Steele dossier in the investigation into the Trump campaign. The most troubling aspect is the fact that it could have contained Russian disinformation. [And the Democrats accuse Republicans of colluding with Russia!]

"Based on the evidence that you have seen," Herridge began, "did senior FBI officials conspire to throw out the national security adviser?"

“Well, as I said, this is a particular episode,” Barr replied. “And it has some troubling features to it, as we’ve discussed. But I think, you know, that’s a question that really has to wait an analysis of all the different episodes that occurred through the summer of 2016 and the first several months of President Trump’s administration.”

In the interview, Herridge mentioned the Steele dossier and how the footnotes suggested that it was "the product of Russian disinformation."

“And there were multiple warnings to the FBI at that time, yet they continued to use that. How do you explain that?” Herridge asked Barr.

“I think that’s one of the most troubling aspects of this whole thing,” Barr said. “And, in fact, I said it in testimony on the Hill, I can’t remember if it was my confirmation, that I said I was very concerned about the possibility that that dossier and Steele’s activities were used as a vector for the Russians to inject disinformation into the political campaign.”

“I think that is something that Robert Mueller was responsible for looking at under his charter, which is the potential of Russian influence,” Barr continued. “But I think it was ignored and there was mounting indications that this could very well have been happening and no one really stopped to look at it.”

It was ignored because Trump beat Clinton.

Later in the interview Barr was asked about the DOJ's decision to drop the charges against former national security adviser and former three-star General Michael Flynn. He explained that the department acted out of a sense of justice and "undid what was an injustice," and added, "it's not gonna be the end of it."

Herridge asked him to elaborate on his statement that it was “not gonna be the end of it,” and he responded, “I said we’re gonna get to the bottom of what happened.”

Herridge asked about the U.S. Attorney John Durham's current criminal investigation into the roots of the Russia investigation. Barr said,  “Well, as you know, I’m not gonna predict the outcome. But I said that we’re certainly — there probably will be a report as a byproduct of his work. But we also are seeing if there are people who violated the law and should be brought to justice. And that’s what we have our eye on.”

Finally, Barr was asked whether those involved in the Flynn case, a clear miscarriage of justice, he responded,  “I don’t wanna get into particular individuals.”

Hopefully the nation will see real justice carried out and those responsible in the FBI and elsewhere, will be held accountable. But don't hold your breath.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.



Tweet

Hillary's emails confirmed top secret by FBI: what difference does it make?

We now know that there were two "top secret" emails on Hillary Clinton's personal water closet server, according to an exclusive report by Catherine Herridge of  Fox News. Both were top secret when she received them and one has since been downgraded to a lower secret level as more information became publicly known.

The sources who spoke with Herridge described the controversy regarding whether both emails were classified at the highest level as a "settled matter." 

The original sources of the emails that owned the classification are the CIA and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA). These agencies reviewed the emails to determine how they are to be stored, in spite of the State Department's discontent of the classification they received. 

Boo-freaking-hoo, State Department--you don't get to make the call.

According to Fox News, the subject matter of the messages is allegedly about the movement of North Korean missiles and a drone strike. Top secret designation requires the highest level of security and may include the use of a government approved safe to store it, because anything designated "top secret" has the potential to cause harm to the nation if it fell into the hands of our enemies.

Clinton did not care about that little fact.

The State Department has been given the findings but they continue to challenge the intelligence community's conclusions about the email classifications. In spite of their whining, they have no authority to change the classification because they did not originate the information--only the agency that "borns" the information has the authority to classify it.

Now it's up to the FBI to conclude if Clinton is charged with a criminal violation. I doubt they will, however, as Hillary seems to get away with murder all the time.


Tweet