No Joke: Hamas demands temporary immunity for terrorists in tunnels beyond Yellow Line

The Middle East peace process is like watching a bad sequel to a hostage thriller where the villains demand artisanal kale smoothies and immunity from plot twists. According to Al Jazeera, Hamas and Israel are apparently locked in direct talks. That's right, the same Hamas that's been using Gaza as their personal underground Airbnb for jihadist raves.

Take this snapshot from Gaza's Beit Hanun, pre-Oct. 7: an Al-Quds Brigades fighter striking a pose that's equal parts "freedom fighter" and "budget Che Guevara." Charming. 

Fast-forward to Sunday, and Hamas is now haggling for temporary immunity for their tunnel-dwelling terrorists in Rafah. The ask? Let these lovable scamps scurry from their subterranean spas to safer spots inside the Yellow Line—because nothing screams "ceasefire compliance" like admitting you've got a Hamas happy hour still bubbling away underground.

This little revelation basically hands the IDF a neon sign saying, "Hey, guys, we know you're still harboring heat-seekers in violation of the deal." Israeli media's whispering that Hamas wants a get-out-of-Gaza-free card for about 200 of these tunnel terrorists. Crickets from the officials at publication time, probably because responding to "Please don't drone our murderers" feels like negotiating with your ex over who gets the good silverware.

Army Radio drops the mic further: these aren't just any three stooges; they've been the recent stars of "Kill IDF Soldiers: The Remix," plus they've been lobbing lead at troops like it's casual Friday in Khan Yunis.  Army Radio pinged the Prime Minister's Office and Defense Ministry for a soundbite. At press time? Still waiting on that statement, like it's the world's slowest pizza delivery.

For the uninitiated, the Yellow Line is the IDF's polite "back off, buttercup" boundary after they pulled back to let the US-brokered ceasefire breathe. Mediators, those eternal optimists, are mulling ops to hustle these terrorists past the Green Line (wait, Yellow? Green? At this point, it's all just crayon scribbles on a napkin deal). Al Jazeera's hot take: Red Cross vans as the getaway cars, because nothing says "neutral humanitarian aid" like chauffeuring militants to their next foxhole. The whole scheme's on ice, pending Israeli thumbs-up. Sure, that'll end well.

This all bubbles up after last month's IDF side-eye at re-encroaching on Gaza turf they'd already vacated, Hamas violations being what they are, like bad tattoos you regret but can't quite laser off. And cue the drama: a Palestinian terrorist decides to play Red Rover, crossing that Yellow Line to menace IDF troops. The Israel Air Force? Polite as ever, struck him down like a piñata at a kid's party gone wrong. The IDF's now festooning the line with markers, because apparently, even in a war zone, you need traffic cones for the apocalypse.

The withdrawal? All per that starry-eyed US-brokered Gaza ceasefire, where "peace" means Hamas gets to play hide-and-seek with international law while everyone else holds their breath. 

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

Iran UN ambassador calls Soleimani droning an 'act of war' but US death 'OK'

It's the height of hypocrisy that Iran's UN ambassador is calling the droning of terrorist Gen. Qassem Soleimani an "act of war," but the rocket attack that left one American dead and subsequent attack on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad akin to "some people did something."

Ambassador Majid Takht Ravanchi told the Compromised News Network that there would be "harsh revenge" for the killing of their terrorist head of their Quds Force on Friday. CNN nodded in agreement with the horror of losing one of their own anti-Trumpers.

“In fact, it was an act of war on the part of the United States against the Iranian people,” he said, discounting the American killing and subsequent attack on our embassy, which is considered US soil and a fully legal act of war.

The US “started a military war by assassinating, by an act of terror, against one of our top generals,” Ravanchi lied--it wasn't an assassination, it was the preemptive elimination of a future threat that was in the works, planned by one of the world's worst terrorists.

“We cannot just close our eyes to what happened last night,” he said. “Definitely there will be revenge. There will be harsh revenge. Iran will act based on its own choosing. The time and place will be decided by Iran.”

And once that is decided, Iran will again be in the crosshairs of the U.S. military. It's really up to them to decide our response should they again attack us. Perhaps they will try taking our sailors hostage, as they did in the Straits of Hormuz. Maybe they will try to blow up a Marine Corps barracks, as they did in Beirut. But whatever they try, President Trump is not going to take their crap as past presidents have.

When there are consequences, Iran will think twice. Oh, they'll do something to avoid losing face, but I seriously doubt it will go as far as all out war. Sadly, I suspect the left would like a war, simply to prove Trump wrong.

On Friday, President Trump told reporters that the terrorist Soleimani had to be taken out to protect American lives, saying: “We took action last night to stop a war. We did not take action to start a war.”

“Soleimani was plotting imminent and sinister attacks on American diplomats and military personnel, but we caught him in the act and terminated him,” Trump said.

As predicted, the left took Iran's side.

The commander-in-chief said that Soleimani had plotted the rocket attack last weekend that killed an American contractor and wounded service members, as well as the attack on the US Embassy in Baghdad that followed.

Ravanchi denied those facts in another bullcrap interview with NBC News.

Meanwhile, protestors are out on the streets of Bill de Blasio's city protesting Trump and supporting Iran. I would love to see them in Iran protesting the Ayatollah.


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.




Tweet

Erdogan calls on Muslims to flood Jerusalem mosque to protect its identity

Turkey President Recep Tayyip [Pee-Yi-Yo-Kay-Yay] Erdogan has called upon the world's Muslims to fly to Israel, head on over to Jerusalem and visit the Al-Aqsa Mosque. 

It would also be great if the pilgrims fly Turkish Airlines and leave a generous donation at the mosque to support jihad while ostensibly going there to protect the site's Islamic identity. 

Muslims believe that their holy pedophile prophet was transported from the Sacred Mosque in Mecca to al-Aqsa during the make believe Night Journey. Legend has it that Mo led prayers towards this site until the seventeenth month after the emigration, when the Devil directed him to turn towards the Kaaba--the pagan stone that Muslims worldwide walk around and practice stone-throwing for future sharia enforcement.

Erdogan, true to the Koran, never misses the chance to bad mouth Israel and this time he compared Israel's policies to South Africa's Apartheid era.

Speaking in Istanbul, where he threw the bull, Erdogan discussed Palestinian economic development and lashed out at Israel over its settlement plans in the West Bank and Jerusalem, in total disregard of the Old Testament describing how the Jews occupied Israel long before Mohammed was even born. 

"We, as Muslims, should be visiting Al-Quds more often," the Turkish leader declared, using the Arabic name for Jerusalem. "Each day that Jerusalem is under occupation is an insult to us."

He was referring to the fact that the Koran calls for the killing of Jews, and what better place on earth to find Jews than the Jewish State.

About 26,000 Turks visited the Temple Mount in 2016. But for Erdogan, that wasn't enough. As a stockholder in Turkish Allahu Akbar Airways, he said that "hundreds of thousands" should be visiting the site, which is considered holy by Muslims. "[It] would be the greatest support to our brothers there," he said.

"Al-Quds is holy for all three divine religions. It is the heart and summary of all human history.

"Both in terms of our religion and historical responsibility, Al-Quds and the fight of our Palestinian brothers for rights and justice is of great importance to us. We will keep making efforts for Quds to turn into a city of peace."

By 'peace' Erdogan is referring to the idea that once all Jews and other infidels are either converted to Islam or dead, there will then be peace. That's what the Koran says, and that's what extremists believe, and Erdogan is an anti-Semitic extremist.

"What's the difference between the present acts of the Israeli administration and the racist and discriminatory politics that were practiced against black people in the past in America--and up until a short time ago in South Africa.

"Here is the only solution," the idiot said. "The establishment of a fully sovereign and independent Palestinian state, with East Jerusalem as its capital along the lines of 1967."

Which, if those lines were established, would leave Israel totally vulnerable to the Muslim world that wants to see them pushed into the sea, so that "Palestine could be free."

It's a pipe dream to believe that if Israel simply gave up even more land, as it has always done to soothe the angry Muslim souls that demand it, to the Palestinians, that this would end all fighting. No, the Palestinians (aka Hamas) have made it very clear that the only good Jew is a dead Jew.

Israel's foreign ministry responded to the Turkish hypocrite saying that "Whoever systematically violates human rights in his country should not preach morality to the only true democracy in the region.

"Israel adheres strictly to full freedom of worship for Jews, Muslims and Christians--and will continue to do so in spite of this baseless slander."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wasn't originally going to respond to Erdogan's speech, but after he heard the hypocrisy being vomited forth and widely reported by the media, he changed his mind.

Erdogan also warned President Trump that he'd better not dare move our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, saying it would be "extremely wrong" and "ill advised."

"It is not a simple location change," Erdogan said. "Those who think that way are not aware of how delicate the balance is in the Holy Land."

Sure--but it was a lot more holy and tolerant before the Muslims came and destroyed churches and synagogues there and around the world.

And while Erdogan and his ilk preach Islamic peace and tolerance, theirs is the one religion that has never seen peace and never were tolerant, not even of different Islamic sects, much less other religions and cultures.


Please follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow tab.



Tweet

Arab Press Can't Believe Muslims Don't Speak Out Against ISIS

The Arab press is attacking the Islamic State terrorists for making the rest of Islam look bad. Many Muslim leaders and Arab pundits are calling the "actions" of IS "cancerous," and that it makes other Islamic jihad terrorism pale in comparison.

Muslim imams and other members of the so-called "religion of peace", such as the the Ayatollah, Osama bin Laden, Anwar al-Awlaki, Imad Mughniyah, Hassan Izz-Al-Din, Ali Atwa, Abdul Rahman Yasin, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Ahmed Ibrahim Al-Mughassil, Ali Saed Bin Ali El-Hoorie, Ibrahim Salih Mohammed Al-Yacoub, Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed Al-Nasser, Mohammed Atef, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Mustafa Mohamed Fadhil, Ahmed Ghailani, Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, Sheikh Ahmed Salim Swedan, Anas al-Liby, Saif al-Adel, Ahmed Mohammed Hamed Ali and Mushin Musa Matwali Atwah, to name just a few, were criticized in the past for not condemning terrorist acts against innocent civilians. 

All these terrorists had to say for themselves was that nobody who refuses to worship Allah is innocent. They added, "How do I know? The Koran tells me so." Okay, I added that--it comes from an old spiritual song.

But an editorial in Al-Quds Al-Arabi based in London (where English soldiers are beheaded on the street and there are 'no go' zones galore) called on moderate Muslims to denounce ISIS. "All we have to do to understand the high price that Muslims pay on all levels [for such actions] is to see how Westerners snatch up [such reports on] ISIS's conquests, invasions and despicable actions, and share them on social media in order to tarnish the image of Islam," the editorial read. "We haven't heard one single voice in the camp of moderate Islam condemning taking women prisoner or expropriating peaceful citizen's property and money of ISL in Mosul, or any who distanced themselves from the shocking fatwas that seem to be carefully formulated for [maximum] service to the enemy."

I take issue on that statement. We Westerners don't "snatch up" reports on "ISIS's conquests, invasions and despicable actions" to share them on social media in order to "tarnish the image of Islam;" we put them on social media to DESCRIBE Islam. Some of us even quote the Koran to show why terrorism is taking place in the world. It's part of jihad and the caliphate. Who spoke out against the fatwah on Salman Rushdie for writing Satanic Verses? The same self-righteous Arab press who wrote this editorial said nothing.


Young Muslims do not stand up against ISIS, many actually leave their family to join the terrorist group. And to refer to ISIS as "militants" gives them credibility of purpose. They are terrorists, plain and simple. They kill people who don't view religion, freedom or democracy the same way as they do, and they are totally intolerant.

But it isn't only Muslims who refuse to make their voices heard, it's all the PC liberals, the gays, the women's organizations who pretend to advocate for women the world over. When GLAAD takes a serious stand against Iran hanging gays, when NOW takes a stand about the stoning of women for myriad reasons, then I'll change my tune.

The Associated Press claims that CAIR, "the largest Muslim civil rights organization in the United States has also rebuked the militants and repudiated those who encourage Americans and others to join extremist groups." But CAIR is as much for civil rights for Muslims as they are for defending Israel's right to exist--not at all.

CAIR has been designated as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trials and many of its leaders are associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization whose charter clearly states "It is in the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet." Hassan al-Banna, Muslim Brotherhood founder.

"American Muslims view the actions of ISIS as un-Islamic and morally repugnant," CAIR said. "No religion condones the murder of civilians, the beheading of religious scholars or the desecration of houses of worship. We condemn the actions of ISIS and reject its assertion that all Muslims are required to pay allegiance to its leader."

But the Koran, Islam's most "holy" book, says: "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." (Koran 2:216) 

Maybe CAIR isn't being straight with us. I don't mean to imply that they're being homosexual with us by not being straight, homosexuality is un-Islamic and merits death.

There are 109 verses that call for Muslims to fight non-believers in Islam. There are also plenty of examples in the Hadith, or biography of Mohammed, the prophet of the religion of peace, but you get the point.

Tweet