IDF neutralizes fire bomber attacking troops in Hebron

Israeli Defense Forces did their job Wednesday by defending Israel and its troops and fatally shooting a firebomb-throwing Palestinian. The incident occurred during violent riots in Hebron

IDF eliminated fire bomber attacking troops in Hebron just hours after Israel defended itself from rocket fire toward Israeli civilian communities overnight.

This one-way ticket to Jannah and the 72 virgins waiting there represented the first death since tensions rose following the release of President Trump’s Middle East plan, according to Palestinian officials.

It is believed by some that Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) is in deep, prayerful mourning for the victim and prays that the Israelis all die.

Guess what his first name was.

The Hebron fire bomber was identified by the Palestinian health ministry as Mohammed al-Haddad. He joined a group of Palestinians in Hebron throwing firebombs and stones at Israeli forces hoping to kill as many Jews as possible, but it didn't work out for them.

Dozens of Palestinians have taken part in violent riots in Hebron in recent days because there's nothing on television worth watching and it's February.

The Palestinians have roundly rejected President Trump's Mideast proposal because they reject every proposal offered to them. Their real hopes and dreams is a world without Israel and the Jews who live in the world. They have not even once accepted a proposal while Israel has accepted every reasonable one offered.

Rioters burned U.S. and Israeli flags as well as posters of Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu because it was a day ending in the letter "y."

The Israeli military said a soldier was wounded by a firebomb at one protest. It says it has instructed troops to “contain” the protests and take their crap, concerned that Palestinian casualties would set off further violence, and the Palestinians needed something to do with their hands now that the fires have quit smoking.

In Gaza, World Israel News reports that the military targeted a Hamas weapons manufacturing site. There were no reported casualties. The exchange comes amid an increase in cross-border rocket and explosive balloon launches from the Hamas-controlled territory. 

Some of these attacks were aimed at primary schools in the hope of eliminating future IDF troops.

The Gaza Strip has been relatively calm in recent months as part of an informal truce between its Hamas rulers and Israel, but tension has increased since President Trump unveiled his plan.

Following the latest rocket fire, the IDF said it viewed the incident with “great severity and is prepared for various scenarios.” It said the zone available for fishing off the coast of the Palestinian territory would be tightened from 15 nautical miles to 10 in response to the rocket fire and explosive balloons.

Palestinian official Mohamed Mohammad Mahmoud Mohammad (his friends call him "3M") demanded that Israel "quit breaking our balloons."

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

McConnell files cloture on more conservative judges

Before the echo of ripped paper dissipated from the halls of Congress, and dentures got back to the gums of where they belong; and before all the angry Democrats filed out of the impeachment trial of President Trump, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) filed cloture on more conservative judges than Flintstones has children's vitamins.

At present count, there are 191 judges put in place by this administration, making the U.S.'s judiciary more conservative than ever before.

The judges included Andrew Lynn Brasher to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eleventh Circuit, Joshua M. Kindred to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Alaska, Matthew Thomas Schelp to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, John Fitzgerald Kness to be U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, and Philip M. Halpern to be U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York.

At present, the Senate is on track to confirm the 34th Circuit Court judge during Trump's presidency by next week and there are three more ready for floor action, which would give Trump about 20 percent of the Circuit Court seats in the country after just two years in office. At this rate, McConnell and Trump could leave few, if any, vacancies there for a potential Democratic president in 2021 and keep America from circling the bowl as the left would like to see.

Even more upsetting for Democrats, the GOP is also preparing to pull the trigger on the “nuclear option,” a move first put in place by former Democratic Senate Leader Harry Reid. This would change Senate rules once again with a simple majority to allow much quicker confirmation of lower court judges in the coming months.

The Trump administration now has 128 District Court vacancies to fill. Under current rules, if any senator demands a delay, it can take a long time to get them appointed. But if Republicans do the Harry Reid nuclear option, Trump could likely fill most of the appointments over the next 20 months.

President Obama was only able to appoint 55 Circuit Court judges in all his 8 years of dividing the country. Trump and the Senate has already appointed 50 in three years, and those that were appointed are seated for life and are all young. 

Thank you Harry Reid.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Lazy critter found in cave--scientists name him "Bernie"

A rare cave salamander named Bernie has been discovered by spelunkers who enjoy checking on things like this and found that he has stayed on the same spot for seven years. He ate on that spot, pooped on that spot, and yes, had his hopes and dream dashed on that spot.

Bernie is a rare creature known as the olmen or olm for short. These creatures can live a very long life and never have an idea that's worth sharing or even have a reason for leaving the spot. This little guy hasn't budged from his crap-laden spot for 2,569 days and all he does is complain and complain about the other salamanders who have more.

“They are hanging around, doing almost nothing,” lead scientist Gergely Balázs told The New Scientist, which angered Alexandria Obviously-Comatose, who refuted Gergely's claims.

Balázs and his colleagues at Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary came across the lazy jerk inside a cave in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Olms can go years without eating or eating other salamander's food, and they don't tend to enjoy socializing. Other animals don't bother to prey on them, according to The Independent. What they really like to do more than any other thing is to complain about the other types of salamanders who refuse to share insects and such.

The small, sedentary, socialist olmen tend to move, according to the study, only when they need to find a mate -- which only happens roughly once every 12 years or so throughout their 100-year life span. But once they find that mate, they tend to move a lot more to the beat of the music, if you know what I mean.

Fortunately, most of these creatures are too lazy to vote.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Rev. Spike Lee says Senators who voted for acquittal are going to hell. Rev. Al agrees

Shelton Jackson [aka Spike Lee] spoke with the very right racist Reverend Alfred Charles Sharpton Jr. [aka Al Sharpton; aka Al Sharptongue] about his religious belief that if the GOP senators were to acquit President Donald J. Trump that they will "burn in hell."

"Especially the white men," Sharpton opined, believing he has God in his corner in his fight against the white.  

“Let me ask you a question,” Rev. Lee said, as reported by Fox News. “Did they have to put their hands on the Bible when they took the vow?”

“I don’t know if they had a Bible out there but I think that they had the Bible up on the podium,” Sharpton responded. “By the way, what exactly is a Bible and why do you ask?”

Erupting into raucous laughter, Lee answered, “They’re going to burn in hell if they put their hand on that Bible,” he said, then added, "and I know that for a fact because I got a direct line to the Big Man Himself. He told me that He's a Democrat and all senators who don't vote along that party line and impeach that motherf****r are going straight to hell."

"No way, brother Spike. He really said that shee? Well roll me over and call me a dead roach. I can't believe you got yourself a direct connection to the Big Guy.

As Lee went on, he also confirmed that God told him that Republicans will be “struck by lightning,” and said that history will judge them harshly and they better hope like hell Adam Schiff or AOC never becomes president.

Sharpton replied, "Ain't no Jew ever gonna be no president, not while I'm here guardin' the hen house."

And just then, an incredibly loud clap of thunder filled the studio creating a moment of fear and mass hysteria among the MSNBC crew.

Fortunately, it turned out merely to be flatulence emulating from Rev. Al Sharpton's nether regions.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

BREAKING: Ethics complaint filed by lawmakers over Pelosi tearing up SOTU speech

Maybe she was just looking for something to do with her hands--those hands that cannot remain motionless for more than a microsecond. But House Speaker Nancy "Dem Dentures" Pelosi (D-CA) is having action taken against her by multiple lawmakers for ripping up President Trump's State of the Union Address on Wednesday night after he finished presenting it to Congress and the American people, as reported by the Daily Wire.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) tweeted:

“BREAKING: I’m filing an ethics complaint against @SpeakerPelosi for destroying @realDonaldTrump’s State of the Union speech. Her conduct was beneath the dignity of the House, and a potential violation of law (18 USC 2071). Nobody is above the law. She must be held accountable.”

There is even some who claim that there's photographic evidence that Pelosi pre-tore the pages below the dais level where she sat while trying to keep her dentures from doing the "Electric Slide."

In a letter addressed to Ethics Committee Chairman Ted Deutch (D-FL), Gaetz requested that the Committee open an investigation “into Speaker Pelosi’s flagrant violation of decorum, as defined in clauses 1 and 2 of House Rule XXIII, and request a criminal referral for her potential violation of 18 U.S.C. §2071 (Concealment, removal, or mutilation of documents), following President Trump’s recent State of the Union address of February 4, 2020. Her unseemly behavior certainly warrants censure.”

“It is hard to overlook the symbolism of such a gesture — the sense that Speaker Pelosi was utterly dismissive of the President’s achievements, and, more importantly, the achievements of the American people,” Gaetz wrote in the letter.

Regarding the violation of 18 U.S.C. §2071 it states:

(a)Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b)Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX) introduced a resolution going after Pelosi for ripping up the document [one page at a time] on national television, calling it was “a breach of decorum,” and noting that it brought “discredit on the House.”

“Speaker Pelosi’s actions last night were appalling and shameful,” Granger said in a statement. “Regardless of her personal feelings, she had a responsibility to conduct herself with civility as the presiding officer representing the House of Representatives. She is not the Speaker of the Democrats, but of the People’s House.”

Yeah, tell that to Pelosi.

“Not only were her actions disrespectful of the Office of the President and the millions of Americans who elected President Trump, they were a slap in the face to the American heroes and their families he honored in his address,” Granger explained. “The privileged resolution was introduced under Rule 9 of the standing rules of the House. It is expected that the House will vote on the resolution later this week.”

Granger tweeted:

Today, I introduced a privileged resolution strongly disapproving @SpeakerPelosi’s appalling actions following President @realDonaldTrump’s #SOTU2020 address. Speaker Pelosi ripped up far more than a speech.
She is not the Speaker of the Democrats, but of the People’s House! pic.twitter.com/LXZNa0KvNY

— Rep. Kay Granger (@RepKayGranger) February 6, 2020

Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) also tweeted Wednesday that he was introducing a resolution censuring Pelosi for her actions and called her actions a "classless outburst" and "[I]n a new low, she violated the Code of Official Conduct requiring Members 'behave at all times in a manner that shall reflect credibility on the House.'"  pic.twitter.com/gvf6KWNpSM

It's difficult to imagine that the GOP is doing more than just spinning its wheels because nothing ever seems to stop the Democrats from their untoward behavior. If Hillary Clinton can get away with violating the Espionage Act and their Party can get away with a politically-driven impeachment attempt, nothing seems punishable.

I hope I'm wrong.

There should be more to follow on this breaking story.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

SOTU: Nancy on a tear, socialism attacked, best speech ever

President Donald Trump's third State of the Union address to Congress was, to date, a work of showmanship and art. I believe that it was Trump's best speech yet.

But after the address, House Speaker Nancy "Dancing Dentures" Pelosi decided to tear up her copy of the State of the Union address while standing behind the President as the nation watched her childish display.

The entire address was a video display showing that the real adults in the room was the GOP and the Democrats, especially Pelosi along with Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Ilhan Omar (D-MN) who both played with their phones, were like spoiled children.

Pelosi's actions resulted in angry blowback, most significantly from the vice president, Mike Pence, a guy not known for angry expression.

During an appearance on “Fox and Friends” Wednesday, VP Pence was asked about Pelosi’s decision to rip up President Trump’s speech in front of the cameras immediately following the speech’s conclusion. He said, “I didn’t see her do it. I found out just a few moments later — and I think it was a new low.”

“I wasn’t sure if she was ripping up the speech or ripping up the Constitution,” he added.

“The contrast here was a president who spent an hour and a half making the speech about America,” Pence continued. “And Nancy Pelosi, in the final moments, tried to make it about her. And I think the American people see through it. I think they see through the pettiness, they see through the politics of all of it.”

They also see how Pelosi's childishness and poor self-awareness, because she came off as an angry loser.

Pence continued, “I think what they got last night was a speech that lifted up the country, that celebrated the incredible progress that we’ve made in our economy, rebuilding our military, strengthening our courts. The stories the president told were American stories, and I just know that it was a great, great blessing to people all across America. And it’s one of the reasons you see the momentum growing behind this president.”

Pence ended by making a prediction. “I just have a strong feeling that she’s going to be the last Speaker of the House to sit in that chair for a long time,” he said.

After the hosts noted that “we’ve never seen anything like that before” and that Pelosi’s actions are being criticized by some as a “sore loser move,” Pence was asked if he thought the speaker planned the act of defiance all along.

“It felt like it. It was such an immediate moment,” said Pence.

Evidently, the seal-begging-for-fish hand-clapping didn't work in her favor, so she waited to put on her immature display. She tore the address one page at a time, just to make sure the nation saw her.

“I’ve been to a lot of State of the Union addresses as a member of Congress, and now this was my fourth as a Vice President of the United States,” he added. “And there’s always a basic decorum and a basic respect. But to have her stand up and tear up that speech really dishonored the moment, and I really thought it was beneath the dignity of a joint session of Congress — and I think it will be remembered as such.”

She also broke with House tradition by introducing the President without the usual honorific: “Members of Congress, I have the high privilege and distinct honor of presenting to you the President of the United States.” And if President Trump actually refused to shake her hand, the hand of the person who would see him removed from office, I commend his honesty. But even that, in terms of whether it was intentional, is unclear.

Following her disgusting act of disrespect on the national stage, Pelosi, with her uncontrollable dentures, told reporters that she felt compelled to do it because it was a “dirty speech” and that her actions were actually the more “courteous” thing to do considering the “alternative” — an alternative that may have included using the address like a Sears catalog in an outhouse.

Were the parts she found dirty may have been about the Tuskegee Airman Charles McGee or his great grandson? Perhaps it was Rush Limbaugh with his dirty cancer. Or the elected President of Venezuela, Juan Guaido? Maybe even the wife of a victim of a Cassem Soleimani roadside bomb? Or the Sergeant who was reunited with his family? It's not obvious what was dirty in her dirty little mind.

But most likely the parts she found dirty were Trump's successes: the soaring economy; the drastic reduction in unemployment across the entire intersectional spectrum that the left finds so important to their political ambitions; the increase in life expectancy; the respect the country is getting from other nations; or simply the fact that Trump is still president and will not be impeached.

The Democrats looked petty and very small. If Trump can maintain the decorum that he had in his SOTU address, he will have another four years to make Democrats crazy again.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Soviet spy congratulated Bernie for 1983 election win, met in his office too

Sen. Bernard "Comrade" Sanders before becoming a prominent Communist contender for the U.S. presidency and before becoming a U.S. senator, was a mayor of Burlington, Vermont.

Upon his win, a spy from the Soviet Union, congratulated him in March 1983 for the re-election win. He even met Comrade Bernie in the mayoral office where they discussed who knows what.

The Washington Post reported on Monday: 

“The documents from the Sanders archives include a letter from Soviet Embassy First Secretary Vadim Kuznetsov in March 1983, congratulating Sanders on his reelection as mayor and thanking Sanders for receiving him in Sanders’s office,”  “Kuznetsov had been in Burlington to attend a conference on nuclear disarmament at the University of Vermont a few days earlier. Neither Sanders nor conference organizers appear to have read a 1976 Time magazine article that identified Kuznetsov as a member of a ‘Soviet intelligence squad’ posing as diplomats to infiltrate U.S. politics.”

Perhaps the Post underestimates Sanders by assuming he didn't know about Kuznetsov's career goals, but c'mon, the guy honeymooned in the Soviet Union and shirtlessly sang patriotic Russian songs with his commie buddies.

The TIME Magazine article that the Post linked to stated: “Posing as diplomats, embassy officials and newsmen, Soviet intelligence agents have been conducting a determined effort to get classified information on Capitol Hill by bribing or compromising staff members in key positions. TIME has learned that in more than a dozen cases in the last decade or so the FBI has stepped in to ‘control’ the relationship, fearing a staffer might begin giving out restricted data.”

The congratulatory letter Kuznetsov sent to Sanders stated:

Dear Mr. Sanders,

Please accept my sincere congratulations on your re-election to the post of Mayor of Burlington.

I have been following with a great interest the final stage of this mayoral race which attracted a lot of coverage by the national news media.

Thank you for receiving me in your office on February 3.

With best wishes,

Vadim Kuznetsov

"Destroy this note after reading," should have been added.

Democrat strategist Zac Petkanas posted a copy of the letter and tweeted: “For the love of all that’s holy. The piece links to the actual letter a Soviet official sent Bernie Sanders congratulating him on getting elected. Can you IMAGINE what Trump would do with this?”

Can you imagine if the mainstream media was conservative!

Hoover Institution research fellow Dr. Paul R. Gregory, a Harvard economist, wrote in a 2019 article that Sanders was a socialist because there was little to no difference between what socialists believe and what Sanders believes as a self-described “Democratic Socialist.”

Gregory wrote:

Sanders has spent a long political career obfuscating his true political beliefs. The media rarely pushes back on his standard platitudes, such as “we must create an economy that works for all, not just the very wealthy.” His two-minute video, promising to explain his brand of socialism, leaves the viewer clueless, probably deliberately. Sanders insists that he is not a “socialist” but a “Democratic Socialist,” as if the difference is self-explanatory. When pressed further about his Democratic Socialism, he resorts to filibustering about the Scandinavian-like paradise of free medicine and education, guaranteed jobs, livable wages, and other free things he intends to introduce when elected. He does not bother to note that the Nordic states rank among the most free-enterprise economies of the globe.

Gregory noted that Sanders is “fully on board with the [Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)] narratives of capitalist exploitation and the need to organize” and that there is no distance between what Sanders believes and what DSA promotes. 

In other words, they basically hate the country but they don't come out and say it.

Sanders' current legislative initiatives, such as Medicare-for-all, as described in his Senate bill, nationalizes all medical care and people with private health insurance can basically go to hell.

So, private health insurance and employer insurance would disappear and private providers would need to reorganize as non-profits and/or governmental organizations. A enormous government bureaucracy would thus determine our medical care. What could go wrong? It isn't like an Iowa caucus, right?

Let's face it, if Sanders is prepared to nationalize fully one-fifth of the economy, he should have no qualms about doing the same to his loathed private energy and the banks and other financial institutions.

Smelly Karl Marx declared that a socialist revolution would be required to part the capitalists from their capital. That's called theft and envy and it's immoral.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Schiff warns us that Trump could sell Alaska to Russia

Seriously, would let this guy pack your parachute?

Under the word "alarmist' in the dictionary is a photo of Adam Schiff, the Democratic congressman from the failing state of California.

Schiff, who is the House lead impeachment manager [a guy who couldn't manage to cover his mouth when he sneezes] warned the nation on Monday that if President Trump's Ukraine dealings are not impeachable [the way he sees it] then nothing would stop him from attempting an even bolder power grab, such as declaring himself king of the world as he rides the bow of the U.S.S. Titanic while grabbing Stormy Daniels on one of her body parts, or even use Alaska as a bargaining chip with "the Russians" for support in the 2020 election.

"Hey Vladimir, this is the Donald," Schiff said in his best Trump-Mafia imitation voice. "I've got an interesting proposition for you if you support me in the next election. Yeah, that's the one I'm in and going to win. So here's the deal, Vlad--you support me and I'll give you Alaska and all the people who live there. You can make them Russian citizens and you can have our airbase and hey, there's even gold in them thar hills. So whaddaya say; you in?"

Schiff floated his schizophrenic thought during closing arguments at the Senate fake impeachment "trial." He appealed to GOPers who acknowledged that the phone call was not "perfect," and that Trump says a lot of crap he shouldn't say. The cockeyed optimist called on the GOP to prevent a "runaway presidency," as his eyes grew three times their normal size and glazed over like a Dunkin' Donuts vanilla creme softy.

"If abuse of power is not impeachable [which it isn't] ... Trump could offer Alaska to the Russians in exchange for support in the next election or decide to move to Mar-a-Lago permanently and let Jared Kushner run the country, delegating to him the decision whether to go to war," Schiff opined. "Because those things are not necessarily criminal, this argument would allow that he could not be impeached for such abuses of power. Of course, this would be absurd. More than absurd, it would be dangerous."

No, dude. What's absurd is that people actually voted for you.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet