Brussels: Flying out on a wing and a prayer

The first plane took off at Brussels Airport since the March 22 attack. The Brussels Airlines jet flew to Faro, in Portugal. Security at the airport was tight, but they sobered up and security got better.

Arnaud Feist, CEO of Brussels Airport Co. labeled he Sunday flight as a symbolic "sign of hope" coming after "the darkest days in history of aviation in Belgium."

Well, I hope Arnaud is right--I hope that Belgium gets its head out of that dark place known best by Islam appeasers and finally realizes the problems all normal nations face: Islamic terrorism.

The Brussles airport has new check-in procedures for passengers--kind of like closing the barn door as you see the horse's butt going over the hill. Now, instead of asking if you packed your suitcase yourself, and if you're a terrorist, they have you open your suitcase when asking that question.

People pushing covered trolleys while wearing only one glove will be asked the same question: "Are you a terrorist, and if so, what are your plans for today?" If they say they plan to have lots of sex with brown eyed virgins, call for backup.

If you really want to curb these Islamic jihad attacks, first you need to hire people whose backgrounds you have completely checked--including their social media.

Then you need to ask the right questions about their belief system and the like.

People who are responsible for any "hands-on" with the aircraft need to be fully vetted. If they happen to be members of the religion of peace, you might take that into consideration in terms of how much information you believe you need in order to feel safe having your kids fly on a plane they dealt with.

Lastly, get Israel to teach you how to make air travel to and from your country safer. They have an incredible record of positive security outcomes.

Most importantly, don't allow your head to wander into that dark region.

Tweet

Obama weepy over Iran's behavior

There is only so much advice one should take from another individual whose emotional involvement affects one's decisions. Valeria Jarrett is not the person Obama should be listening to when it comes to trusting the behavior of the Iranian theocracy. According to the blog  Conservative Report, Jarrett was the "brains" behind the Benghazi decisions that saw 4 Americans killed.

So who knows who the decision-maker regarding the Iranian nuclear deal was? Maybe it was Jarrett, maybe it was Obama. Either way, the United States came out of that deal looking like naive rubes. 

"Iran so far has followed the letter of the agreement," Obama whined, "but the spirit of the agreement involves Iran also sending signals to the world's community and businesses that it is not going to be engaging in a range of provocative actions that are going to scare businesses off. When they launch ballistic missiles with slogans calling for the destruction of Israel, that makes businesses nervous." 

Not that calling for the destruction of Israel bothers Obama all that much--it's just bad for business. You know, "First they came for the socialists . . . then they came for . . . " yadda yadda. 

It might scare away the Obama socialists.

It's amazing that Obama didn't think Iran would not abide by the spirit of the agreement. Amazing . . . unless he's as smart as his zombies believe he is and did the deal in spite of the consequences. After all, he lives in a protected environment and can duck radiation with his girls and Valerie by his side.

And perhaps Michelle if she gets off his case now and then.

So now Obama is criticizing Iranian leaders for undermining the "spirit" of last year's historic nuclear agreement, even as they stick to the "letter" of the pact.

After our president virtually bent over backwards for Iran, what do the go and do? Use your imagination.

Obama claimed that Iran's troubles after the sanctions were lifted and we still plan to allow them access to our banking system and Hillary's emails, were due to Iran's support of Hezbollah, ongoing ballistic missile testing, and other aggressive behavior.

Like humiliating our Navy.

But it's only a military organization, to Obama, so what's the big deal again?

"Iran has to understand what every country in the world understands, which is businesses want to go where they feel safe, where they don't see massive controversy, where they can be confident that transactions are going to operate normally. And that's an adjustment that Iran's going to have to make as well."

Obama loves to lecture the world. He's definitely the smartest man who ever lived, or ever will.

Except for any conservative, patriotic American.


Tweet

Obama: a double-crosser or just a liar?

Obama invents the 'groin salute'

You've heard the lies by Barack Obama: 

"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor . . . period." Saying that his position on ISIS being a JV team wasn't referring to ISIS. Saying that "Most young Americans right now, they're not covered [with healthcare]." "Fast and Furious began under the Bush administration." "We've excluded lobbyists from policymaking jobs.""I have not said I was a single-payer supporter." "We import more oil today than ever before." 

For more lies perpetrated by Obama,  go here.  The above lies were just the tip of the iceberg.

Now Robert Gates, former Secretary of Defense under both George Bush and Obama, says that he feels "double crossed" by our current empty suit. The lie, this time, was Obama's promise not to cut the defense budget.

When Fox News asked Gates whether Obama kept his word, Gates responded, "Well, I think that began the fray. 'Fray' may be too gentle a word." 

The defense budget had already been slashed when Gates was told to cut it again to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars. "I guess I'd have to say I felt double-crossed. After all those years in Washington, I was naive."

Gates tried to get Obama to make the defense cuts gradual, but with the Islamic State growing from a "JV team" to "State Champs," our so-called commander in chief thought that less is more. People who have their brains in their nether regions often think backwards.

Fox also spoke with former Gen. Michael Flynn who was director of the DIA under Obama. Flynn too wasn't impressed with Obama's strategy. "Frankly, the United States of America is in a less strong position today because of the readiness and the size of our armed forces," he said, and then added, "I think he sees the military actually as something that is more dangerous to the world. I think that he looks at the United States military and sees it as a threatening application around the world, than actually as a useful tool."

There is no question that Obama does not see the USA as a force for good in the world.

He makes military veterans and other patriots ashamed of having him as the president.




Tweet

Police say 50 ISIS friends worked at Brussels Airport

Brussels airport partially reopened today after the March 22 attacks by two suicide bombers, killing 35 people, shut it down. An open letter from police, who had gone on strike after the attacks, made claims that hopefully will allow the West to remove their collective heads from their nether regions.

A police contingency wrote an open letter to the press criticizing alleged security failings at Zaventem airport. They claimed that 50 ISIS supporters remain on the airport staff and believe this may cause safety problems in the future especially to passengers who are not Muslims, or who are of a different Islamic sect, or who are gay, or who are of the same sect but don't pray five times a day to the moon god, Allah.

So the police demanded extra security measures be taken to ensure the safety of all infidels, which in the mind of ISIS, is everyone but ISIS card holders.

The specific demand is for checks at the main entrance to the departure lounge. In the past, authorities worried that checking for bombs, guns, and other weapons of mass airport destruction could create unwanted bottlenecks going into the airport.

"Now remove your shoes, granny"

The police officers complained that some airport workers jumped with glee, handed out candy,  performed "high fives,"and patted each other on the back in celebration of the Paris attacks.

That has to be bad for business and makes bottlenecks seem rather trivial in comparison.

Some Muslims suspected of having fought in Syria came to the airport as "false tourists," (Taqiyya tourists) the police said in the letter, and they reported this to authorities. However, they do not know if anything was done with the information, the letter added.

"When we checked these people, we were surprised more than once. It was men with radical ideology and a long police history," they said.

[After delving into the backgrounds of these men, it was discovered that the men in question were all religious Muslims who believe fully in the precepts of a book called the "Holy Qur'an."]

The letter went on: "Even today, there are at least 50 supporters of the Islamic State who work at the airport. They have security badges and have access to the cockpit of a plane."

For me, I would not only investigate these so-called "workers," I would investigate the people or person who authorized their employment.

But maybe I'm being too picky. After all, if that happened in the USA, I wouldn't want the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to jump all over me.

The letter admits that "In the past, a number of people had their badges revoked because they had IS sympathies. But clearly not everyone, especially in store personnel, cleaning services and baggage where we find the most suspicious people."

I can hear the people at CAIR saying, "Aww, c'mon. What damage can a baggage handler do?"

Tweet

Obama blames the video again

French President Francois Hollande spoke this week in Washington regarding Islamic terrorism that is perpetrated by Muslims who follow the Islamic religion religiously. Listening to the speech President Obama was as uncomfortable as an armless kid with poison ivy covering his chicken pox.

The speech Hollande gave was video recorded by expensive, sophisticated video equipment--much better equipment than the equipment used by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula when he made Innocence of Muslims, a video that landed him in jail for the abuse of freedom of speech the administration doesn't like.

Hollande spoke at an international summit on nuclear security focusing primarily on global terrorism. The exact demographics of these terrorists is still a mystery to the Obama administration, but they are exploring it in depth.

Part of Hollande's speech, the most important part regarding the First Amendment was"

"We are also making sure that between Europe and the United States there can be a very high level of coordination. But we're also well aware that the roots of terrorism, Islamist terrorism, is in Syria and in Iraq. We therefore have to act both in Syria and Iraq, and this is what we're doing within the framework of the coalition . . ." 

But somehow, according to the Obama administration, the audio failed just at the moment Hollande's English translator said "Islamist terrorism, is in Syria and in Iraq."

They don't make coincidences like that anymore.

As luck would have it for conservatives, but not so much for libtards, the Media Research Center caught the omission. No liberal watchdog group was lucky enough to have caught it, however.

Perhaps when Obama was a young boy going to an Indonesian madrassa, he was instructed to never put the words 'Islamic' and 'terrorist' together as it will rob him of his future virgins. I don't know. But Hillary Clinton is just as stubbornly set on never mentioning who the terrorists actually are--maybe that's the suicidal aspect of political correctness.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said, "After every one of these attacks, the president does a national TV conference where he refuses to say the words 'radical Islamic terrorism.' Instead he lectures Americans on Islamophobia. Well, enough is enough."

In an effort to assist our so-called president when dealing with the aftermath of an Islamic terrorist attack, I designed a template, which you can read all about here. 

ISIS jihadists praying to Allah

Anyway, the White House told several news agencies on Friday that the audio gap was simply the result of a "technical issue," not an attempt to scrub or censor President Hollande's words. 

Maybe, but I kind of doubt it--too serendipitous for my liking. They finally put up the full audio on their website after they were caught omitting it.

But here's the funny part: Obama says that he doesn't say "radical Islamic terrorists" because saying it legitimize the efforts of the Islamic State.

No, the words don't legitimize anything, President Empty Suit, they describe the enemy which can only serve to help produce strategies to fight them.


Tweet

World leaders meet on ISIS nuke drones

Britain Prime Minister David Cameron warned Western leaders that ISIS plans to use drones to spread nuclear material over Western cities in order to kill as many infidels as humanly possible in order to achieve the rewards of Paradise.

Well, he didn't exactly put it in those words, but that's the reason ISIS do what ISIS do.

President Obama, who refuses to see any connection between Islam and terrorism, made a sour face and casually flipped the PM off. "We don't call 'em ISIS here in the USA," he said. "We call 'em ISIL to include the Levant."

There is a growing concern that Islamic terrorists are looking to buy commercial drones to launch dirty bomb attacks over major metropolises like New York and London.

Obama, who lives in a protected environment in Washington D.C. said, "I personally don't believe it, and would you please stop saying 'Islam.' They are the kindest, gentlest, sweetest, most productive, smartest, best-smelling people on the planet. Hell, they built that."

Cameron met with US, French and Chinese officials as he voiced his concern in his rather effete British accent, saying the dangers of ISIS getting nuclear material were "only too real." The three nations are planning to plan a way to counter any future nuclear attack.

ISIS may have already seized around 90 pounds of low-grade uranium from Mosul University in Iraq after they captured it in 2014.

"So many summits are about dealing with things that have already gone wrong [thanks to Obama]. This is a summit about something we are trying to prevent," Cameron pretentiously added.

Cameron plans to hire a thousand more armed police and deploy counterterrorism units on the perimeter of London to counter any attacks. 

Mr. Obama is planning to watch him do that.




Tweet

April Fools Day for Islamofauxbia

New York City -- A Muslim woman in full-battle hijab was walking along lower Manhattan at Broadway and Rector Street. That would be the area in the shadows of the World Trade Center, if they hadn't been destroyed in an Islamic terrorist attack.

The 20-year-old woman claims that she had just left cosmetology school where she was studying to become a beautician (how un-Islamic) when a person came up to her, yelled "terrorist," then slashed her across the cheek.

She later admitted that she was lying to police.

The reason Muslims like this one lie about being assaulted is to get sympathetic media coverage and push the notion that Islamophobia is rampant in the US. It's the same whenever there's an Islamic terrorist attack in the world--Islamic organizations tell us how much they worry about "blowback" from crazy Americans. CAIR is masterful at using this ploy.

Except there is no blowback.

The reason Muslims make claims like this knife jihad is to shut up all criticism of Islam. You most often learn later that the person who wrote graffiti on the mosque wall was actually a Muslim from its congregation looking to get sympathetic press coverage so they can scream "Islamophobia."

Except that it's actually "Islamofauxbia."

The New York Daily News reported:

A woman who told cops she was called a terrorist and slashed on her cheek in lower Manhattan on Thursday later admitted she made up the story, police said early Friday.

The woman, who wore a headscarf, told authorities a blade-wielding wacko sliced open her face as she left a Manhattan cosmetology school, police sources said. 

But police could find no video or witnesses to back up her account and she ultimately admitted her wound was self-inflicted. 

The woman was taken to Bellevue Hospital for treatment and later a psychological evaluation. 

The woman is probably not as crazy as she is religious. What she did was done to further the goals of Islam. The very word 'Islamophobia' was invented to do exactly the same.

She must have thought that we're April fools.


Tweet

U.S. gives Iran love, gets the bird

Our wheeler-dealer-in-chief president is apparently willing to allow Iran to access our banking system. That goes way "above and beyond" the requirements of the so-called nuclear deal, according to Mark Dubowitz, a top sanctions expert.

Dubowitz is the executive director of Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD).  He detailed a US Treasury Department plan that permits the use of US dollars to facilitate global business transactions with Iran, describing it as a "bait and switch which ignores a long-standing administration commitment not to green-light Iran's access to the greenback. This is above and beyond what is required by the nuclear deal," Dubowitz said.

The Associated Press reports that "Several restrictions would apply, but such a license would reverse a ban that has been in place for several years and one the administration had vowed to maintain while defending last year's nuclear deal to skeptical U.S. lawmakers and the public."

In other words, if Iran wants to mess with our dollar, they might gain the ability to jury-rig the system to do so. 

Sen Marco Rubio (R-FL) along with Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL) documented Treasury Department assurances that it would not allow Iran any access, direct or indirect, to our banking system as part of the nuclear deal.

In their letter to Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew they wrote:

Senior officials in the Treasury Department have repeatedly assured Congress that the Administration will not allow Iran direct or indirect access to the U.S. financial system, and we believe this prohibition to be prudent in light of the Iranian regime's continued state sponsorship of terrorism, threatening ballistic missile activities, and egregious violations of human rights. In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on July 23, 2015, you said: "Iranian banks will not be able to clear U.S. dollars through New York, hold correspondent account relationships with U.S. financial institutions, or enter into financing arrangements with U.S. banks." And in testimony before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Union Affairs on September 17, 2015, Acting Under Secretary of the Treasury Adam Szubin assured lawmakers that "no Iranian banks can access the U.S. financial system; not to open an account, not to purchase a security, and not even to execute a dollarized transaction where a split seconds worth of business is done in a New York clearing bank."

By allowing Iran to have access to our banking system in any way would severely limit the U.S. ability to impose new sanctions on Iran if and when they break the nuclear agreement, which, of course, they will. This is both Dubowitz and Annie Fixler, a policy analyst at FDD saying that.

When Obama refuses to call out Islamic terrorism for what it is, and refers to Islamic State not as ISIS but as ISIL, that should tell us where his heart lies, and it certainly isn't with Christians nor Israel.

When the national disgrace to the Navy uniform, State Department spokesman John Kirby, was questioned about the new sanctions relief during a Monday presser, he declined to answer and referred the question to the Treasury Department.

So not only is this administration the worst when it comes to making "deals," it is the worst in protecting its citizens against countries who very clearly wish "death to America."




Tweet