Obama blames the video again

French President Francois Hollande spoke this week in Washington regarding Islamic terrorism that is perpetrated by Muslims who follow the Islamic religion religiously. Listening to the speech President Obama was as uncomfortable as an armless kid with poison ivy covering his chicken pox.

The speech Hollande gave was video recorded by expensive, sophisticated video equipment--much better equipment than the equipment used by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula when he made Innocence of Muslims, a video that landed him in jail for the abuse of freedom of speech the administration doesn't like.

Hollande spoke at an international summit on nuclear security focusing primarily on global terrorism. The exact demographics of these terrorists is still a mystery to the Obama administration, but they are exploring it in depth.

Part of Hollande's speech, the most important part regarding the First Amendment was"

"We are also making sure that between Europe and the United States there can be a very high level of coordination. But we're also well aware that the roots of terrorism, Islamist terrorism, is in Syria and in Iraq. We therefore have to act both in Syria and Iraq, and this is what we're doing within the framework of the coalition . . ." 

But somehow, according to the Obama administration, the audio failed just at the moment Hollande's English translator said "Islamist terrorism, is in Syria and in Iraq."

They don't make coincidences like that anymore.

As luck would have it for conservatives, but not so much for libtards, the Media Research Center caught the omission. No liberal watchdog group was lucky enough to have caught it, however.

Perhaps when Obama was a young boy going to an Indonesian madrassa, he was instructed to never put the words 'Islamic' and 'terrorist' together as it will rob him of his future virgins. I don't know. But Hillary Clinton is just as stubbornly set on never mentioning who the terrorists actually are--maybe that's the suicidal aspect of political correctness.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said, "After every one of these attacks, the president does a national TV conference where he refuses to say the words 'radical Islamic terrorism.' Instead he lectures Americans on Islamophobia. Well, enough is enough."

In an effort to assist our so-called president when dealing with the aftermath of an Islamic terrorist attack, I designed a template, which you can read all about here. 

ISIS jihadists praying to Allah

Anyway, the White House told several news agencies on Friday that the audio gap was simply the result of a "technical issue," not an attempt to scrub or censor President Hollande's words. 

Maybe, but I kind of doubt it--too serendipitous for my liking. They finally put up the full audio on their website after they were caught omitting it.

But here's the funny part: Obama says that he doesn't say "radical Islamic terrorists" because saying it legitimize the efforts of the Islamic State.

No, the words don't legitimize anything, President Empty Suit, they describe the enemy which can only serve to help produce strategies to fight them.


Tweet

Libyan Brain Flushings

Is freedom of speech being challenged by the Obama administration?   If coming down hard on the guy who made the Muhammad video and accusing that video of being the catalyst that caused the attack in Benghazi, then yes, Obama is challenging our First Amendment right to freedom of speech.  The fact is, Obama and the Situation Room knew about the attack in real time, and were totally clear about it within an hour as emails have shown us, but his administration confabulated a false claim and a man is in prison because of it, and four Americans are dead because of an order to "stand down." 

But even more frightening is what Hillary Clinton said to Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone Woods, one of the slain SEALs.  She told him not to worry, the administration plans to fully prosecute the man who made the video about the prophet of Islam, Muhammad, which they claimed incited the riots that were actually responsible for killing his son.  Of course, Clinton didn't use those words, but that's basically what the message was--as if the video had anything to do with the terrorist assaults in the first place.  

The story told by Federal authoirities was that the demonstration was an unplanned spontaneous response to that "disgusting" video, a movie trailer made by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, a 55 year old Coptic Christian in southern California.  I have viewed this video, Innocence of Muslims, and concur that it's not very good, but it's an expression of Nakoula's freedom of speech.  Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to say things that people want to hear, but it includes the freedom to say things that people don't like and don't want to hear.

In my next blog, I plan to discuss our First Amendment right in more detail.  I believe  this issue is one of the most important ones that we face for the immediate future, particularly if Obama is re-elected.

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover       

click here for ebook version   

Check out: My other blog New York Canuck

Tweet