Occupy Bye Bye

Cleaning up body fluids & body waste of pigs

Occupy Wall Street is being evicted. They were told to leave Zuccotti Park and the NYPD is finally removing them.  An odiferous woman with oily hair commented: "All my friends are in there--this is my f***ing home," When asked to produce a legal deed for the property, she flipped the reporter "The Bird." The smell of feces and sewage is gone and now the park smells like disinfectant. Tonight, the protestors are allowed back into the park, but the police are checking them to ensure that they brought no sleeping equipment.

You can evict our bodies but not our message: "Um"

The protestors believe they have the right to "live" in Zuccotti Park. Some guy who looked like a Vietnam War protestor, spoke out on the news about how it was a victory that they were being allowed back into the park--a private park--and he said that he is willing to sit upright all night, since sleeping gear is no longer going to be permitted.  Mayor Michael Moneybags Bloomberg spoke about the Constitution and how it is clear that the protestors have no Constitutional rights to continue to be in the park. He said that it is unconstitutional.  It's as if the Constitution was written last week and Bloomberg is upholding it. What about when these idiots first arrived? What about the Constitution at that time? What about the Democruds and their take on the Constitution? Did it just now become valid? Lucy Billings, a judge who worked for the ACLU, told Bloomberg, the smellers could occupy the park as long as they want, but she was rightfully overruled by a higher court, and a judge with a brain.

In my mental travels along lower Manhattan, I was fortunate to run into my old buddy, Michael Mierda, who provided me with a live, albeit emitic interview:

Me: So, Mr. Mierda, the police have orders to ask you all to leave. How do you feel about that?
Mierda: Right now I'm not feeling nothin' but the freak. I got my freak on with some of the best s**t you can get here, man, and ain't nothin' gonna screw my freak.
Me: Are you saying you're high on drugs now?
Mierda: (begins singing "Rocket Man," by Elton John) An' I think it's gonna be a long, long time . . . yeah, man, you could say that I'm feelin' high.
Me: But you're going to have to go elsewhere tonight, Mr. Mierda. The park is being closed to the Occupy movement. What are you going to do? Where will you go?
Mierda: Dude, if I gotta sleep on Bloomberg's fu*kin' lawn tonight, so be it. Hey, ha ha, I never ever used 'so be it' man, that's cool. So be it.
Me: Mayor Bloomberg is saying that you'll be able to return to Zuccotti Park after it's cleaned up, but protestors aren't going to be allowed to have sleeping bags and tents there anymore. Where will you go?
Mierda: F**k, if it comes to that, man, we'll sleep sitting up, leaning against each other, like brothers and sisters, and our bodies will keep each other warm, man. You know what I'm sayin'?
Me: Once this protest is over, what will you do and where will you go?
Mierda: Easy, man. I'll go back to my old lady's basement and sell my foodstamps. I'll be cool. If I can get rid of my school loan, like the movement advocates, hey, that's another cool word, well, if I can dump the loan, then maybe I'll get a job. Don't want no job if I gotta pay back the loan, man.
Me: Thanks for your time, Mr. Mierda. It's always an adventure talking with you.
Mierda: I think I just crapped myself again, man.

Michael Moore's Lake House: where he goes when he laughs at the "99%"

Tweet

GOP Debate Number 895637

First question about last night's debate: why is Jon Huntsman even there? He's at point zilch in the polls and is more RHINO than Republican. But he has lovely daughters who support him and lend him a smidgeon of cred.

Scott Your-Time-is-Up Pelley

Now the debate. Scott Pelley from CBS, and Major Garrett, from National Journal, (and a mother who gave her son a somewhat mediocre ranking for a military position), moderated the debate, which lasted 90 minutes, 60 of which was televised and 30 of which was on the internet for those with longer attention spans. The questions were asked by these liberal moderators, and one minute was given for the answers with 30 seconds for follow-up questions by liberal moderators not satisfied they heard what they wanted to hear, or thought they could get the debaters to fight it out between themselves.


Herman Cain got the first question which was about Iran's weapon threat and what he would do about it. Herman basically talked about how he would involve the Iranian opposition forces within the country and help them fight back. Cain was clear that if push came to shove, he would not engage Iran militarily if they developed a weapon. For me, bad answer--they will use a nuke as quickly as they would use a prayer rug.


Mitt Romney was asked the same question by the Major moderator and he was clear that if Obama was re-elected, Iran would have a weapon; if Romney was elected, they would not. He also made it clear that he would do whatever was necessary militarily to stop weapons production. Good answer--I want a happy future without having to pray to Kukla, Fran, or Allah. After 30 seconds of trying to answer the question, Scott Pelley cut Mitt off then realized he was a jerk and apologized. Mitt kept his presidential smile intact and continued on in his Mitt-like way.


Then Newt was asked by Major Garrett about Romney and he tried to get Newt to attack him. But Newt refused to comply with the minor Major, and made it clear that every single person up on the dais would do a far better job running the country than Obama. Newt rocks when he isn't rolling.

Perry tried to speak about Iran but was disparaged by the moderator (I believe it was Pelley, but it doesn't matter since they both were as vacuous as a black hole). He made it clear that he could answer both the moderator's new question and the more important one as he sees it. Perry's answer, like Cain's was okay, but it was something that he could have gotten from a conservative newspaper, like the Daily Planet, since that may be the only conservative newspaper left.

Then we have Ron Paul, along with his enthusiastic and loud audience, The Pauliberalatos. They cheer when he speaks, and boo when anyone else does. They hang on every word he utters, much like baby monkeys hang onto mommy's udders when they suckle. But Paul, who probably wasn't much of a physician, would not be much of a president, heaven-forbid that would ever happen. He is the epitome of what a true RHINO is, and even said that if he is not nominated (speaking like the proverbial snowball in hell), he would not support the Republican nominee. This, to me, is an excellent reason to not have him speak at the Republican debates--he's not a true Republican.

About three days into the debate, the moderator asked Michele Bachmann her first question and her answer, about tactical strategy in Afghanistan, was spot on. Of course the moronic moderator Pelley, interrupted her, but that's to be expected on CBS, which stands for Consistent Balless Swill. Both she and Perry made it clear that Obama was wrong and dangerous to our troops for announcing to the enemy when the pullout would take place. Next thing you know, Obama will email Ahmadinejad the plans for our nuclear weapons systems and brag that he'll never be able to duplicate them.


For me, Newt won the debate, hands down. He consistently refuses to allow the left to dictate the rules of engagement in these debates, and his knowledge, encyclopedic information, and verbal acumen makes him stand out and makes him outstanding. 

Dumbest and Dumbester

I think a pretty cool guy once said, "He who amongst us is free from sin, should cast the first stone." Newt's past is laden with mistakes that men of power frequently make. Does that make them poor leaders? I don't think so. Does it make them bad people? Definitely no worse than many of us who refuse to cast stones. Oh, and while that goes for Newt, it also goes for Herman, who I still believe is totally innocent of all claims that were made without proof. The left, as I've said before, never needs actual proof--their proof is their feelings. And how can feelings be wrong? Just ask Roseann Barr and Michael Moore.





Tweet

Hypocrisy Squared

Change--please change

On January 21, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama welcomed his new senior staff and Cabinet Secretaries to the White House. He made one of his typical flowery speeches but the most important thing he told them was:  

"Going forward, anytime the American people want to know something that I or a former president wants to withhold, we will have to consult with the Attorney General and the white house counsel, whose business it is to ensure compliance with the rule of law. Information will not be withheld just because I say so; it will be withheld because a separate authority believes my request is well-grounded in the Constitution. Let me say it as simply as I can: transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency."

Now his Attorney General, Eric Holder, has his own problems, not with transparency, but his lack of it in the now famous, (at least to the conservative media audience), Fast and Furious operation, where weapons were allowed to "walk" into the hand of straw buyers and subsequently, to drug cartels. At least two weapons were responsible for the murder of ICE agent Brian Terry.  Holder denies any knowledge of the operation, the administration is not releasing all the records requested, and the roots of this operation are as transparent as Obama's secret meeting on the actual issue of transparency, back in the same year he took office. Yes, you read this correctly--Obama had a secret meeting on the issue of transparency and how it should be "handled" by his people.  This is known as hypocrisy. At least Holder was not guilty of being hypocritical as he did not call the parents of Brian Terry, nor say to them that he was sorry for the agent's death.


Hypocrisy: the state of pretending and professing to have standards, virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, and the like, that one does not actually possess. It involves deceit, falseness. Hypocrite: one who practices hypocrisy


 Used in the following sentences:
1. Liberals tend to display hypocrisy when attacking conservatives. 2. Who is more of a hypocrite, Nancy Pelosi or Barack Obama? 

Let's get specific. Bill-Smoke-This-Clinton could not keep his pants from falling below his knees when he was, in the liberal mind, the greatest president who ever did not have sex with that woman . . . Miss Lewinsky. The media protected him, even after other women came forward. Lots of other women. Instead of looking into Bill's behavior, they attacked the women who were harassed by Bill. On the other hand, when Clarence Thomas, a Republican, was accused by Anita Hill of sexually harassing her, the media was all over him and made her out to be a saintly victim of this oversexed black man. Liberals always see black men as oversexed while they pretend to be the party for racial equality. Tell that to the southern blacks lynched by the Dixiecrats for looking at a white woman.

Now we have Herman Cain, who is being accused of nonspecific inappropriate behavior, by three anonymous women and one woman who seems suspect due to her past and her current need for money. Chris Matthews already labeled Cain as guilty, without a trial, without evidence, and for Matthews, with nothing more than a tingle up his leg for Obama. The liberal rationale is, that if one woman makes a claim of sexual misconduct, well, no big deal. If two, then maybe there's something to it. Three, well he must be guilty. Four is a given. Except that all four women were connected to the National Restaurant Association, all from Chicago, and one even lives in David Axelrod's building. And if you know anything about Axelrod and Chicago politics, you know that having doubts about the authenticity of anything he is involved with, is legitimate.  

Cain only worked for the NRA for 3 years and has decades more time in businesses spent elsewhere, and he has an impeccable record. In America, a man is innocent until proven guilty. That's what separates us from dictatorships. And let's face it, no matter what those morons on the left say about America, you don't have any leftists moving from here to Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. They come here because of our freedoms and opportunity.

Killing babies since 1966

Hypocrisy on the left is clearly visible with certain leftist organizations, like the National Organization for Women, "taking no real action for women since 1966." Their claim to fame was burning their bras back in the 60's along with the proud killing of babies, but when it comes to real feminist issues, like those issues where women are stoned to death in certain parts of the world, by their Muslim counterparts for being raped, or for marrying or not marrying those who they wish to marry or not, NOW is as useless as reason at an Occupy protest. NOW should be ashamed of their lack of action where these poor women are concerned, but they dismiss them as irrelevant to their cause. I guess killing innocent babies is what they really stand for.

Sharia law in action

In my next blog, I will discuss more hypocrisy as it involves the left and its take on religion, sharia, and the Constitution. Or maybe I'll just rant about something else.



 

Tweet

Hey, Take That American Flag Off: This is America

I believe the United States of America is the only country in the world so politically correct, that we subordinate ourselves beneath other countries when it comes to respect--at least where self-respect is involved.   

In California, the Supreme Court decided that school administrators can ask students to remove their  American flags from their clothing on Cinco De Mayo, a Mexican holiday.  This is to avoid offending Mexicans, both legal and illegal, I suppose, and to keep violence to a minimum.  Soon they will be thinking about having Christians remove their crosses on Yom Kippor, a high holiday for Jews, and Jews remove their Star of David and mezuzahs on Christmas. Of course, we will not be able to call it Christmas because that will offend non Christians, and perhaps we should stop openly celebrating Jewish, Christian, Hindu, and all other religions but Islam, as it will offend Muslims if we continue worshipping other deities than theirs. I can see a time come when atheists will ask all religions to cease and desist their religous practices--well, maybe not Islam--atheists tend to be short on testicular fortitude and would never tell a Muslim to remove a Koran from the room.

We all know California is flaky, but this is ridiculous and it's becoming the norm in other areas of American life, which, by calling it American life, offends immigrants.

Click here to sample Jihad Joe, a novel

Tweet

Conservative Thoughts of the Day

A suicide, a homicide, some drug overdoses, multiple injuries, and rapes--protestors dropping like flies while the flies are dropping from the odor of the anarchists. The media has been attacked and even the liberal mayoral leaders are getting tired of the garbage, the violence, the anger of these directionless socialists who, on one hand protest capitalism, while on the other, want the capitalists to forgive their loans, give them jobs, feed them and keep them warm during the night. Why isn't Nancy Pelosi (Princess Nancy as Cain called her) being interviewed and asked how she feels about these cretins?

Obama holding his own

Oakland cops tell rallyers to "protest at your own risk". Gunfire killed one guy in a brawl that began with a fistfight; then the shooting began--but they're saying it had nothing to do with the demonstrations (they actually call hanging around, having public sex, doing drugs, crapping on police cars, yelling at working people, demanding free food, debt forgiveness, and jobs, "demonstrations"). In Oakland, they are politely asking the smellers to "please leave peacefully" but I doubt they will.               

Solyndra emails have been reluctantly released by the White House. Of course, they released nothing incriminating--they may smell fishy, but they're not stupid. Imagine if you only watch MSNBC you wouldn't even know what Solyndra is/was.

Eric Holder is still free from prison, but hopefully the Republicans will correct that problem. The parents of Agent Brian Terry, who was killed in Operation Fast and Furious,  are calling for Holder to step down. Holder refused to apologize to the Terry parents, but dickheads often behave that way.


Obama honored veterans today at Arlington National Cemetery. He looked about as comfortable as a man on a pogo-stick in a minefield. Michele looked like she was pretending to be proud of her country for the second time in her adult life. I cannot imagine how the left feels about our leader.

Jerry Sandusky

Question: Why can't Jerry Sandusky have a chemical orchiectomy and spend the rest of his life in prison? He got his supply of children from the charity he ran--how convenient. There are actually some psychiatrists who want pedophilia to be decriminalized--the news hasn't mentioned this today. I wonder if it ever will become mainstream media worthy. Ha.  Interesting how the students of Penn State are siding with Joe Paterno--the famous coach who knew about Sandusky's pedophilia and didn't go to the police--I guess it's hard to prosecute a winning coach, just like they're allowing Sandusky to walk the streets without putting him in prison because he too, wins football games. Well, not anymore.So, Paterno has "lawyered up" and Sandusky is on bail.


Tweet

State Pen and Penn State

Propedophile Sandusky

 For fifteen years, Jerry Sandusky, Assistant Coach to the famous and popular Joe Paterno, was sexually assaulting prepubescent boys. The total number of these children, at least those we now know about, is eight. What we also know is that Joe Paterno, ('Joe Pa,' as Penn State football fans lovingly refer to him) was aware of Sandusky's behavior but did nothing to stop it from continuing, thereby allowing this piece of garbage to continue molesting children. Paterno "regrets" this, but I bet the parents of those eight children regret it a lot more. 

Angry but not angry enough

What could a bystander like Paterno say to himself to justify not doing anything to stop the asssaults? "He's too damn good of a coach to let this get in the way of our winning"? or "They'll get over it and forget about it in time, like nothing happened"? I'm not sure that there is anything that justifies saying nothing when you know something terrible is happening to young innocents.


Mike McQueary, another team coach, saw Jerry Sandusky rape a young boy in the shower several years ago. McQueary is not going to be coaching the game this weekend because the college is afraid for his safety. But why is the school firing Joe Pa but not McQueary? It sounds weird . . . in fact, it sounds queer. 

Mike "Speak No Evil"  McQueary

Whatever you think of Joe Paterno, he is, after all, just a man. There is no question that he should have reported the abuse of the boys as soon as he knew it occured--to withhold it from the authorities, is akin to sanctioning it, and it makes Paterno culpable. How incredibly sad that a guy Paterno's age, who has led such a wonderful and long career in college football coaching, should end it this way. How sad a man like Joe Paterno, who saw and did nothing, cannot be prosecuted for his lack of action when it could have saved at least 7 kids from sexual trauma that they will have to live with for their entire lives. McQueary is no better and deserves the same punishment if the facts are real, and that Paterno and he were aware of Sandusky's disgusting behavior.


The mob at Penn State is protesting Paterno's firing. The mob always takes the wrong side, which is why they are a mob--think Occupy Yadda Yadda. The mob has become the voice of the left. It is a voice of empty thought and false emotion. If your child was the ninth child getting raped by a pig like Sandusky, how would you feel about Paterno and McQueary?





Tweet

Debating the Debaters

I'm not going to pretend I watch CNBC or any of the NBC affiliates. As far as I'm concerned, NBC stands for Not Being Credible or National Bull Chippers, and MSNBC stands for Matthews Speaks Nothing But Crap. I've had it with leftist media, and while I want to keep an open mind on both sides of the political spectrum, I find it intolerable to listen to the garbage the left spews pretending it's newsworthy.

I am not going to pretend that I know the names of the libtards who questioned the GOP candidates in the debate. The woman, who I've seen before as I heard her smear the GOP candidates, I will refer to as Clay Lips. She seemed to delight in attacking the answers to the questions she asked before they were completely formed by Cain, Gingrich, and Romney, and I believe she had an orgasm, (much like Biden did when Solyndra was first mentioned in his office), when Perry screwed up his answer by forgetting the third program he would cut if he were King of the Forest--I think all of America's conservatives felt sorry for him, but those of us who know about his sympathies with Islam and sharia law, felt relieved.

Rick Santini, I believe his name is, was an utter moron with his tone and the framing of his questions, and he couldn't hide his hatred for the right when he challenged their answers. I thought a debate was supposed to be between the candidates, not between the people asking the questions and the candidate trying to answer them. I wish Republicans would stand together to boycott the overtly liberal-socialist media, but that would probably be impossible from a practical standpoint as they all feel they need as much exposure as possible. (Why does the word 'exposure' always remind me of Democrats like Weiner, Clinton, and JFK?)


But Clay Lips, Santini, and the Sphincter Brothers aside, I think we can see who came out on top in this debate. If you said Perry, you weren't watching--his brain fart, I believe, caused him the nomination. But if you said Romney or Cain, I think you're on the right track. Cain handled the questioning of the sexual harassment allegations extremely well and, as always, is personable and likeable. I think his reference to Nancy Pelosi as "Princess Nancy" was a big mistake because it was petty and may have taken away some of his likability score. Romney seems presidential and really is a job creator, whether you agree with that or not. I concur with Dick Morris that Romney actually is a conservative and his Massachusetts politics was his way of getting elected. I may be wrong, but I'm the last to admit it, with the exception of Obama.

I believe that Gingrich, as always, did well, but he was a bit pedantic and somewhat pissy, and this will not score points with independent voters. He comes off too professorial but he is glib and knowledgeable, with tons of political experience and success behind him. But then there's that little issue of scandals to deal with--this is his thorn.

I think Bachmann was fine, but she's like that longshot I bet on a few years ago at Belmont Park--still running for the clubhouse turn at the stretch with a lot of track out in front.  The left wing media also portrays Bachmann as an insane flake, which is disgusting of them to do, but certainly not out of character. The one thing you have to say about Michele Bachmann is that she is consistent in her beliefs, and is very good with dealing with numbers involving the economy.

Santorum about to do something

Rick Santorum always looks like he is about to cry or soil his pants, and Ron Paul looks like he should be holding a rectal thermometer and preparing to use it on you. (Rectal thermometers, by the way, remind me of Al Gore, who, I always think of as "earth's rectal thermometer.') John Huntsman seems like the kind of guy who always had his lunch money taken from him by some big kid named Jimbo. His numbers suck like a black hole but he's fun to listen to because he acts like he knows everything and even speaks Mandarin or whatever. 


I can't believe that there's less than a year for the election. Time seems to fly under socialism, cronyism, and Eric Holder's lies. The thing that worries me is that Obama has tons of money and the average IQ is 100.

Tweet

Guilty Until Proven Innocent

The 4th Accuser Sharon Bialek

What is the one part of a man that gets him in the most trouble? Exactly--his libido. Herman Cain is being accused of having made inappropriate sexual advances on a bleached blond woman named Sharon Bialek (pronounces by Cain as "Blech"). She is the 4th woman to make such accusations but what about her?

Ms. Bialek has a history of financial and lawsuit problems. She has had tax liens, been a defendant in about 6 lawsuits, and has ongoing financial problems. Coincidentally, she and David Axelrod live in the same high-end Chicago apartment, attended the same  gym, but Sharon said she never said or did anything to or with Axelrod in the steam room or elsewhere in the gym, and that has nothing to do with the Cain situation. It is just an incredibly amazing coincidence and that's all.  She simply wants to set the record straight and have Herman lose any and all chances of being elected President of the United States of America after he admits all his wrong doing.

When Cain allegedly put his hand up Ms. Bialek's skirt, shoved her head toward his crotch, she implored him to stop by saying, "Why are you doing this? You know I have a boyfriend." That seems to me to imply that she would have gone further had she been flying solo in her life, but I can't prove it--but neither can Bialek prove her allegations. Of course, proof doesn't seem to matter in our society anymore--it's enough to be accused.

I don't think Cain would have been nominated for the GOP candidate, but if he was, I would have voted for him over Obama in a heartbeat. But now I suspect that he will have to bow out of the campaign, even after his press conference, scheduled to take place in about an hour. I am going to watch the conference and finish my thoughts on this submission. As it stands now, Cain is tied with Romney in the polls, but this might be subject to change rather abruptly. 

Briefly, and on a lighter note, President Obama's microphone picked up a brief conversation he had with French President Sarkozy in which the Frenchman said  
"I cannot bear Netanyahu, he's a liar." Rather than defending the leader of our best Middle East ally, Obama responded: "You're fed up? But I have to deal with it all day." This is Obama's default position in foreign policy where he appeases our enemies while sticking it to Israel. I guess this really wasn't a lighter note, but it needs to be discussed in the election, I believe. The only question I have is whether or not Obama actually knew his mike was on--I almost believe he did and this was his way of telling the Islamic world that he's cool.


Getting back to Herman Cain and the allegations, the press conference begins
Held in Scotsdale, Arizona, Mr. Cain introduced by Lin Wood, his attorney, of Jean Binet Ramsey fame.  He spoke about how as he represented  victims of sexual assaults, and never "paraded" them in front of the media. As he spoke, Mr. Cain stood by and watched the presentation as Mr. Wood explained how memories fade after 14 years, and witnesses disappear. Now Mr. Cain has to respond to heresay and rumors, without the chance to cross-examine his accusers, Wood explained.

The Big Winner-a liberal lawyer

Mr. Cain spoke--he appeared somewhat sombre and used notes, which he pointed out that he didn't normally use. "I have never acted inappropriately with anyone, period." He stated that he didn't know who his accuser is and didn't recognize her name. He said he is running and not backing off--he is doing it for the American people. He also attacked how the media is "beating [me] up." He spoke about how his accuser is a troubled woman and how the democratic machine is using her.


I felt sad for Herman as he spoke, perhaps because I think his campaign may be doomed, but we shall see if this is going to be the case. Funny, but  I believe he told the truth. I believe he is innocent because the bastards haven't proven him guilty, have they? 


I like that Mr. Cain spoke out to protect his family and told the media that if they want to attack, they attack him, not his them. That's a man. He spoke about his reputation that he worked to build up for 40 years. I like that he stayed on point about the fact that we have much bigger problems in our country. I think he nailed this, but I hope the public agrees.


A man is innocent until proven guilty--that's the American system of law. There are no facts, just an unfactual accusation. Bialek has not ruled out to making money from this situation in the future, and that gives me pause.




Tweet