More On Obama, Lies

In a previous blog I mentioned how our president is having a love affair with those in the religion of his father and step father, both Muslims. I would have added his grandmother, but she vehemently claimed to be a Christian and I suppose out of respect for somebody somewhere, made her journey to Mecca and the Hajj as an undercover Muslim, since non-Muslims are forbidden to go there under pain of something painful. Peace be upon her.  But the love affair Obama is having with Islam is worse than Weinergate, worse than Clinton with Monika and Jennifer and Nina Burleigh, and maybe even Bella Abzug (yuck), and even worse than JFK and his nightly need of prostitutes. The love affair Barack Hussein Obama has with Islam can actually hurt America (Canada included). Islam is already changing the face of the West, but it's hard to see the change because all the women have their faces covered along with their drop-dead bodies in their holy potato sacks. 

Obama said that Islam is a religion of peace. Let's vet that statement for him, since the media isn't going to do it.  In fact, the media did as good a job of vetting Obama as airport security did with Muhammad Atta and his gang of flying virgin seekers.



The Islamic scripture that all Muslims find infallible and perfect is the Koran, which I usually don't capitalize, but I'm being uncharacteristically polite. The reason this book is "perfect" and the go-to manual for Muslims is that it is allegedly written by Allah, who actually is a pagan moon god, but let's not lose our heads over this issue. So if the Koran is the perfect book, existing for all eternity, then by definition, there should be no errors in it because Allah is perfect, and snakes are good with hula hoops and other things that require dexterous hips.

My first issue regarding this claim of perfection is the idea that the verses, called Suras, were told to Mohammad, peas be up in him, by the angel Gabriel over a period of several decades. The earlier Suras were told by Gabriel at a time when Mohammad, Pez be upon him, was down in Mecca and his followers were few and far between--maybe fifty, if he was lucky. These Suras were peaceful and tolerant of Jews and other living things non-Islamic, because Mr. Mohammad wanted to gain a following, much like many of us who use Twitter. But few followed this red headed prophet of Islam because they thought he was nuts (this was before they knew about schizophrenia and temporal lobe epilepsy--either condition a likely contributer to the horrible brutality he brought upon the world), and he had nothing to offer but his version of god. The Jews ridiculed him, and he didn't like being ridiculed because it made him angry, and like the Hulk, you wouldn't like Mohammad, peas beans up in him, when he was angry.  In Mecca, Mohammad, puss be up in him, met Khadija, an older, wealthy woman who needed a man, pronto. They hooked up and our prophet of Islam saw that he had a good thing going, so he stayed with her and her alone and didn't let his Weinergate get him into trouble. But she died and he eventually left Mecca and headed on out to Medina where he had around 10 thousand followers, between nine and twelve wives, because he abandoned the idea of religion for religion sake, and came up with the idea of sex and booty, in the days when booty didn't mean sex. 

The Suras of the Medina period were not as kind and gentle as the earlier Suras that Gabriel was whispering into his extremely hairy ear. They spoke of how Allah hates nonbelievers, and particularly has a beef with Jews, who are described in the Koran as the "worst of people," and were even described as pigs--but if you're a Christian, don't think you've gotten away with anything, because the Koran's Suras referred to Christians as apes.  Now the Suras said things like "And kill them wherever you find and catch them. Drive them out from where they have turned you out; for Al-Fitnah (polytheism, disbelief, oppression) is worse than slaughter." 2:191 Why the Koran begins sentences with the word "And" is beyond human understanding of perfection.

Of course you will hear Islamic apologists telling you the kinder more gentler Suras like, "There is no compulsion in religion." But they don't tell you that these kinder, more tolerant verses were the earlier ones that were whispered gently in Mohammad's, piss be upon him, ear, and that these verses are abrogated by later verses. Interestingly enough, if Allah is so perfect, then why did he need to abrogate anything? He should have gotten it right the first time. This perfect Koran is definitely not the United States Constitution, which, by the way, Barack Hussein Obama thinks is not relevant to the USA anymore. The Constitution can be modified, it can be amended or abrogated as the Koran is told to be. Hey, this is the freaking perfect word of god--there should be no need for changes.  So when Allah sweetly suggests in the Medina Sura 8:39 "Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah," or Sura 9:123 "Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you," he is telling you what to do and even goes into detail about how to do it. He suggests such niceties as chopping off hands and legs on opposite sides of the body, and beheading is really big with Allah too. It always confused me that if Allah is perfect, and the creator of everything, then why did he create all these nonbelievers he hates? Seems to me he could have just created Muslims, but that might prove boring. Oh, and the perfect book never once mentions electricity or Brooklyn, New York, or anything that would make a skeptic believe that Mohammad, piece be him, wrote the book himself with a little help from someone who wasn't illiterate like him.  The religion of peace is a lie; it's taqiyya, which is an Islamic tactic where one can, and should lie, to promote Islam. Mohammad was a bad person and Islam is a fundamentally terrror-driven religion. How's that for politically correct, eh?


Just this past April, Eric Holder, our fabulous Attorney General, decided not to pursue the indictments of the unindicted co-conspirators in a Hamas terror funding case in the US vs Holy Land Foundation. We have tons of evidence linking the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Omar Ahmad, its co-founder, and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) with financing terrorism. The fact that they were not indicted had nothing to do with their innocence, but more to do with expediency at the time the case came up. This is the aspect of the Obama administration that honestly worries me--it's his bowing to this religion, making excuses for the terrorism we endure, and opening up progressively more sensitive government positions to people who simply haven't been vetted anymore than Obama himself.

Rep. Peter King (R-NY) wrote to Holder asking why he decided not to prosecute alleged bastards who fund terrorism (I said 'alleged' so I'm okay). We are still awaiting justice, Mr. Holder, but I suspect that word actually eludes you because you are blinded by political ambition and have sold your soul to the Obama administration.  In fact, Mr. Holder, since 1999, on an NPR broadcast, you made it clear that you don't really believe in freedom of speech as you would limit the Internet and are still singing that same song along with Obama.

The most important liberty we have in the USA comes from our First Amendment, the freedom of speech. When imams pressured Obama, as they've pressured other Western leaders, our president caved in to their ongoing b.s. cries of Islamophobia, and discussed the idea of "hate speech" and its criminal intent. Well Mr. Obama, the idea of censoring hate speech is the same thing as stifling free speech--the entire idea is subjective and interpreted by those in power to dictate what hate speech is--if they say talking about Islam is hate speech, then it is, even though Islam, like any religion, is an ideology.  You obviously want to control the Internet, Mr. Obama, and the rest of the media that refuses to abide by your liberal (read 'socialist-Marxist') stance, and you want to take away our right to bear arms, a right specifically designed to keep the government from overthrowing the people, not a right for hunters to own guns, as you would have us believe. The more I hear you tell us what you want for our country, the more you remind me of Ahmadinejad, Assad, and the rest of those Islamic dictators who shut off the Internet and media, and keep their people helpless.

Mr. Obama, your father was a communist, your mother was a communist, your step-father was a communist, and your friends are either communists, socialists, and/or terrorists (don't tell us Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn are not your friends--and don't convince us they aren't terrorists because blowing up government buildings isn't terrorism). You are a very dangerous person, Mr. President and hopefully you will be a one-term president. Your words are empty, like your policies--empty of the change and hope you promised the naiive, empty of truth that you say is America, and empty of  real idealism, because socialism is false idealism; America was, and is, the best nation on earth and does not need the change you  promised its people when you were elected--with the help of your ACORN bullies and your lies.

If You See His Lips Move, He's Lying

No other president of the United States has done more to try bringing change to the United States of America than Barack Hussein Obama. Yes, he is working tirelessly to make America the "Land of the mediocre and unspecial." Not an easy job considering what a great nation we have, and we are very lucky to live in the United States. But Obama wants "Change we can believe in," and all we have is change--loose change, and a few dollars to pay for groceries and pray we don't fall sick and need to use Obamacare.  But I want to focus on his hypocrisy today. Maybe next time I'll talk about the love affair he has with the MSM.

Back in November 2009, our brave Navy SEALs captured Ahmed Hashim Abed, a very bad man. Abed (his friends called him Asofa) was the mastermind of the killing and horrible mutilation of many Americans in Fallujah, Iraq in 2004. Rather than being seen as heroes, Rowan Scarborough from Fox News reported, these brave men faced court martials because Abed got a boo-boo on his lip, and it was bleeding when he was captured. Of course, the SEALs were demoralized over the actions against them that was being considered and there was talk amongst them that they weren't going to do any more capturing of these killers in the future. A military source who went unnamed said this court martial was Obama's idea because he was still angry over the SEALs operation involving Capt. Richard Phillips. Phillips commanded the Maersk Alabama and it was pirated by Somali Islamic pirates in April 2009. They held the Captain for 38 days and the SEALs, who had closed in on the vermin, were under Obama's rules of engagement, which was:  do nothing unless Capt. Phillips is in imminent danger. On the 38th day the SEALs site commander had his men take out the garbage, because he determined that the garbage put Phillips in imminent danger.  Barack was fuming and threw a presidential hissy fit, and being a man of his character, took it out on the SEALs who had simply done their job with Abed. Later in August of that year, Secretary of State Clinton said that she regretted the fact that the US did not accept the authority of the International Criminal Court (ICC) when it came to dealing with these poor pirates.

So now we're supposed to use the laws of the ICC rather than our own laws to determine the moral conduct of our country? I don't think so. Fareed Zakaria, Obama's consultant and CNN newsman, is keeping Obama honest, and they both think so. In fact, Zakaria recently said that he thinks the US Constitution is outdated and needs an overhaul. I say he should consider returning to his land of birth, Bombay, India, where the people are called "420's" which, according to Indian penal code, stands for robbery/fraud, and seems to suit him well.

Our Hero?

The hypocrisy of Obama is astounding. When Osama bin Laden was shot in the head, wrapped is swaddling clothes, prayed over by a holy imam and summarily dumped into the depths of the sea, only to be eaten by sharks with bad taste, Obama acted like he just took off his flak jacket after doling out some serious whoopass. The SEALs were quietly mentioned as accomplises to Obama's excellent adventure.  Moreover, Bush's methods were what got Obama the information they needed to find the Hide-and- Seek Champion of the World, but to hear Obama, you might think he figured it all out on Facebook.  I don't know about you, but as for me, I'd vote for  a recliner before I'd vote for Obama. But seriously, how can we allow our country to continue along this road to even more socialism? How can we allow him to control freedom of speech, of press, and now, the internet? 

We must vote him out in 2012

Tweet

Barack Hussein Obama's Islam Part 2

On June 3, 2009, Osama bin Laden said, "We either live under the light of Islam or we die with dignity . . . brace yourselves for a long war against the world's infidels and their agents."

Well do not think for even one minute that our fearless president let that comment go without a fierce repartee.  He was not going to allow that terrorist to have the last word. He was going to give it back to him and give it to him but good, as they say (at least my mom did when I was young and being a boy). On the very next day, at the Cairo address (where he bowed deeeeply to the king), he said: "America is not--and never will be--at war with Islam." Brass balls, our president--let's just hope they don't make their way onto Twitter. But the Muslim world didn't read this the way any liberal kid who wdfhants to be president when he grows up would read it; they read it as weakness and sheer pussy-posturing.


This was a clear defining moment of our president--a wea0k man--like the kid who gets bullied in the schoolyard by some boy who isn't even his size and strength--and the kid cringes and says, "I don't want to fight with you." Then he quietly wets his pants as the bully laughs and walks away. But maybe I'm wrong about Obama; maybe he really isn't scared; maybe he just wants to make friends with the bully so they can take over the whole schoolyard together. Let's look at him in greater depth.


In his inaugural address, he made it a point to speak directly to the Muslim people and said that he sought "mutual respect."  This, according to our new president, would be the new way forward, and according to the Muslim world seeking expansion through jihad, would be the new way into our "miserable house," as the mission of the Muslim Brotherhood declared in a confiscated document we recovered in an intelligence operation. Obama sang the mutual respect tune throughout the beginning of his failed presidency while the Islamic world had about as much respect for him as they do for the American Rabinnacle Institute of Sheboygan. Obama said, "I have come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world . . ." I love that term--a new beginning. It's so, so . . .  liberal, is what it is. It's so "forgive me, Hillary, I didn't mean to have sexual relations with that woman, let's seek a new beginning," kind of liberal. So pathetic.



The mutual respect ploy was also used when we sent more troops to Afghanistan and he used it withthe "Good Jihadist Ahmadinejad"--I will not quote the kissy-facey details as it is elsewhere on my blog and this time I might toss my Uneeda Bisquits. Suffice it to say that he acts like we don't respect Muslims, but they respect us. It's the big Islamophobia lie. We show more respect for them than they have or will ever show. It's in their DNA to think they are better than us, even when all the evidence proves it isn't true. This is so true, in fact, that  if you're a Muslim and read my last sentence, you will have interpreted it to mean thai I said we are better than you, which I didn't say at all. But I will say this, our culture is better than yours, and our belief systems are clearly better than yours. We honor our wives, we don't hit them. We love our daughters, we don't honor kill them, even when they're bad. We love our neighbors, even when they're of a different religious belief--okay, so maybe we don't love them, but we don't cut off their heads because they don't believe in your god, the moon god, who hates and hates everything that isn't what Muhammad was.

Point is, this is how Obama projects himself both to the Islamic world and to us, his loyal followers (until 2012, one hopes). But there's a much shadier side to Barack Hussein, and that's the side that worries me, and should worry you, unless you're a jihadist yourself, or a sleeper cell person hiding out in Sheboygan. Obama has many Muslim friends, and friends who were once Muslim but don't play that game anymore.He also panders to Islam.

Details. 

There she goes just walkin' down the street

Louis Farrakhan is a friend of the O-Man. He has visited the White House and has spent quality time with Hussein. Louis is of the Nation of Islam and is a proud Jew-hater and honkey-hater as well, although he has not emphasized the latter quality of late. He is not received well in Israel nor at the American Rabinnical Institute of Sheboygan.


Jeremiah Wright, the right leftist Reverend of the United Trinity Church, a man who most notably said, "God damn America," and other things my mother would have washed his mouth out for--I miss Mom today. In his presidential campaign, Obama pretended not to have heard 20 years of racial hatred, socialist anger and propaganda, and straight-forward anti-Semitism from this racist pig.

Rashid Khalidi was a professor at Columbia University and taught Middle Eastern politics. Joel Klein, the New York City's school chancellor, removed Khalidi from the program after it was discovered this jihadist justified terror attacks on Israeli civilians. Khalidi was also the director of WAFA, the official press agency of the PLO, from 1972 to 1982 in Beirut. His lovely wife Mona, headed the  Arab American Action Network, a fiercely anti-Israel organization and miraculously received a $110 thousand from the Woods Fund, a non-profit organization based out of Chicago. One of the board of directors of the Woods Fund was Obama, of the Hussein middle name variety, and it turns out he and Rashid Khalidi taught at the University of Chicago in the 1990s. Coincidence? You make  the call.

 Please, no more Muhammad jokes

There's more--a lot more, but I suggest you get "The Post-American Presidency" by Pamela Geller with Robert Spencer, and learn who Barack Hussein Obama really is. It just might blow your mind. I haven't touched upon Obama's failure to balance the national budget since being in office, nor the Bush tactics he used to get Bin Laden. It boggles the mind that liberals might vote for him again, and that his methods, his past, his socialist beliefs and his obvious anti-Israeli policy and total disregard for Constitiutional procedure have gone unchallenged in a court of law.

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

Barack Hussein Obama's Islam Part 1

Who loves ya baby?

It seems like a waste of time trying to discern whether or not our president is a Christian or a Muslim. I sure don't know, and to tell you the truth, I don't really care. All I know is what he says and what he does. He says that we will never be at war with Islam, and I believe that he may believe that, but secretly believe that he knows we are already at war with Islam and he's pretending we're not. I think if every Islamic nation on the face of the planet (which is flat, according to what Allah says in his fantasy novel) said they wanted the USA and Israel destroyed, Obama would pretend they meant it metaphorically and would do nothing to stop them. This is how much I trust this guy to lead, (what was once a great nation and is now at risk of becoming just another Obama-esque mediocre nation), into the future.

Let's look at his record and you come to your own conclusions.

At 13 she's marrying age

In June 2009, Hussein Obama went to Cairo where he almost cleaned the King's shoes with his tongue when he bowed oh so deeeeeply that King Abdullah's smile nearly broke his face. In his speech Obama bragged: "The US government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it . . . I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal." Then Bingo! five full days later, a lawsuit is filed on behalf of a Muslim corrections officer, Yvette Bashier, in Essex County, NJ. Maybe she was testing Obama's honesty about what he told good King Abdullah regarding a woman's right to cover her head, because she wore a khimar or religious headscarf. Obama's boys took Essex County to court. What occurred was that when she refused to comply with the demand to wear the proper uniform, she was first suspended and eventually fired. Well, Obama and his Justice Department won and our US Constitution lost. Sharia law had come to New Jersey in the form of a lawsuit. The result was a $25 thousand settlement. (I wonder if Obama knew that this woman belonged to the Muslim-American Society, or MAS. Interestingly, MAS is kissing cousins with the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that would have had monkey sex with Osama bin Laden if they could, but homosexuality is punishable by death in Islam so they'd have to wait until they got to Islamic Paradise where young boys who never age could serve (read: service) them. Nah, how could he know this--he isn't Muslim, right?)

In the same speech in Cairo, Obama spoke about protecting freedom of religion, (evidently, freedom of speech was lower on his list of things that need protection), saying, "That's why I'm committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill zakat." Since zakat, or charitable giving, is one of the five pillars of Islam and an obligation to all Muslims, one can see why much of the charitable giving goes to other obligatory Muslim activities like jihad and the purchase of Ali Bauer suicide fishing vests. The truth is, a substantial part of zakat does, indeed, go to organizations that would see the USA either obliterated or under the sword of Islam. 


In the same month, Obama made several interesting appointments. First he appointed a Muslim named Kareem Shora to the Homeland Security Advisory Council. Prior to this position, Shora was the executive director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, a group of guys who go against all our efforts to stop terrorism in America since 9/11. Can you imagine appointing the fox to guard the henhouse? But wait, it gets better. Next the O-man appoints Arif Alikhan as Assistant Secretary of Policy Development at the DHS. Alikhan is a guy who said Hizbullah is a "liberation movement," and had also thwarted efforts by the LAPD to gather data about the ethnic demographics of the area mosques. Alikhan called the LA Deputy Chief, Michael Dowling, Islamophobic, discriminatory, and a racist. Dowling had asserted the reason he wanted this information was to: " . . . know where the Pakistanis, Iranians, and Chechens are so we can reach out to those communities." But Alikhan was hearing none of that and Dowling had to give up the idea. We have to be tolerant of their intolerance, I suppose.

This actually might make one wonder if they found Osama bin Laden by the return address on a job resume he sent to Obama. One thing for sure, the mainstream media wouldn't tell us if that were true. 

More to follow in my next exciting adventure into the bowels of Obama. 
 

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

They're Illegal, So What?

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the head of the Democratic National Committee--also known as America's Socialist Party--has denounced the GOP for actually saying that illegal immigration is illegal and thus, "should in fact be a crime." Maybe the word "illegal" eludes her.

"Some of my best friends are from there"

At a breakfast held by the Christian Science Monitor, Debbie Dubya  Schultz (remember how they made fun of Bush with that sobriquet?) said that she and the Obama administration believe that we need a comprehensive immigration reform (read: a comprehensive illegal immigration reform). "We have twelve million undocumented  immigrants in this country [why's that, forgot their papers?] and this is not only a reality but a necessity."  It's only a neccesity if your political platform is to take away jobs from legal residents who pay their taxes and vote and give the jobs to these folks. Then Schultz added, "And that would be harmful--the Republican solution that I've seen in the last three years in that we should pack them all up and ship them back to their own countries and that in fact it should be a crime and we should arrest them all." 

So, Ms. Schultz, what you want is for the government to set up illegal immigrants with Welfare and make sure they get Food Stamps and community Medicaid so they can get the medical care they need. We should forget those fools who spent the time and effort to follow the laws of our land and get their "documents." There should be no different treatment for anyone who wants to come to America and reap the benefits. Everyone is equal. 

Schultz had the audacity to say, "If it were up to the candidates on the Republican side, we would be driving foreign cars; they would have let the auto industry in America go down the tubes."  But if it was up to Obama, eventually we would have no freedom of speech; Sharia law would rule the land, and women drivers would not even be allowed to drive cars in the first place.

Well . . . it turns out Schultz owns an Infiniti, which is made in Japan, of course. I imagine she could defend that little fact by claiming she bought the car to help support those victims of the tsunami, but she'd be lying like a New York Times reporter discussing Anthony Weiner's moral character.  Like most liberals, she's a hypocrit. Like most liberals, she does not see America as special.

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

Obama Plays America

 Photo by Impeach the Idiot

We have elected a man who is playing at being president. Sure, he speaks well, has a copious vocabulary, uses words like "gonna," "look," "Islam is a religion of peace," but he talks like a man with a paper pooper; and when he isn't talking garbage, he is talking about his socialist and Marxist plans for our country. And he does it for personal power.

When the economy, under Obama's watch, began to circle the drain, his solution was to throw money at the problem, and the problem in this case was his friends in Goldman Sachs. How lucky for his friends that the company gave out huge bonuses at the end of the year in spite of the debt they had yet to pay off. This was Obama's bailout, and the GOP wasn't happy about it. Then our faux president had the government buy two of our automakers, which he now wants to control in terms of their manufacturing output. He wants us to go green and doesn't care that there is no profit in that--his job is to save planet Earth from extinction, and heck, if anyone can do it, a leftist can, no matter how many people he puts out of work, and no matter how much he continues to plunge the American economy into the toilet. It has been demonstrated that when the government gets involved in private industry, you can be certain they will screw it up, and private industry, in the opposite situation, tends to create profit. 

Obama's words, like his actions, are hollow. He says one thing, but it doesn't matter because he's either going to take it back by denying what he meant by what he said, or he is going to pretend he never said it in the first place. Sometimes he even says one thing and does the opposite, like when he ran for senator and his cronies got their hands on sealed divorce papers on two of his opponents. (Mentioned in a previous blog). Then when Michelle Obama was quoted saying, "For the first time in my lifetime, I'm really proud of my country," Obama sanctimoniously said that this was a personal attack on his family, when, in fact, it was merely a quote of what his family member said. If quoting liberals is an attack, then what is misquoting them, murder? So he can go after sealed divorce papers to smear his opponent, but you better not quote his wife when she reveals what she really thinks about this country. Of course, I haven't even touched upon the smears the media did to his opponents in 2008--Sarah Palin and her family, for example. Obama didn't have to do it himself when the entire liberal press corps did it for him.

A lot of what our country "used to do" is eroding; liberals want to change it; they always want to change things because it's part of their dogma, their sense of moral superiority. Conservatives are different.  We want to preserve those things we hold dear about our country, our values and traditions; yes, our American culture. Multiculturalism is a farce. America, as Obama refuted, is special. We stand head and shoulders above the Middle East in our values with the way we view equality, freedom of speech, religion, and the law. We are the "good guys," who are in danger of losing that title if we go against what is right about us, like standing behind our allies, and refusing to bow to our enemies. When Obama bowed to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, my heart sank. No American President has ever bowed to royalty from any country, much less a country that supresses its women, kills its gays, is intolerant of Christians, Jews, and other non-believers. 


If 9/11 happened last September, would we have voted for Barack Hussein Obama, knowing what we know about him now? Is the American memory so short that we don't recall the flames, the people leaping to their deaths, just before those buildings came down, and Muslims danced in the streets throughout the Middle East and, yes, even Brooklyn, New York?  Who could blame Obama for not wanting to use his middle name until he was safely elected? Who can blame him for not releasing information about who contributed to his campaign from Gaza and why, after it was discovered he didn't return the money? Who cares that he has done nothing as president that a Muslim president, at this current period in American history, would not have done?

Do you care? If you've read this far, then I believe you do.

Why the Mainstream Media is Like Hoover

No, not Herbert Hoover--Hoover vacuums. It's because they both suck. But the MSM cannot suck enough after what they did to Palin in the 2008 campaign against their darling, Barack Insane Obama.

The microsecond John McCain chose Sarah Palin as his runningmate, every liberal news agency sent out their crack SWAT team to Alaska to dig through garbage cans and look under rocks for any dirt they could find on the Alaskan governor. Faster than four shakes of Clinton's wee wee, the media became indistinguishable from Obama's presidential campaign as they claimed Palin cheated on her husband, faked her last pregnancy, fired the town librarian for refusing to ban certain books, lied about her opposition to the "bridge to nowhere," and didn't know that the Founding Fathers had written the Pledge of Allegiance. But the press didn't spare her family either--they accused her Iraq-bound son of being a juvenile delinquent and they also accused Todd, her husband, of using his political clout to intimidate the Alaska Public Safety Commissioner. Next they accused her 18 year old daughter of being something along the line of a slut for being pregnant and single. and Palin's sister was described as a bitter and miserable divorcee.

Now the media is chasing after Palin and she isn't playing their game. In fact, if she did play their game in the political sandbox, they would find a way to throw more sand in her face.

While these Palin accusations were being slung by the feces-throwing media, Joltin' Joe Biden was having problems of his own when a former business partner claimed he had defrauded him out of millions of dollars, and there were two lawsuits filed in June of that year; juicy reportage material, right? Of course, the Washington Post  buried this story and the New York Times  had not reported it by Election Day. The rest, unfortunately, is history. Imagine, if you will, what would happen if McCain's former partner sued him--you know the media would go crazy. Did they tell us about the sick racist rants by Jeremiah Wright, like when he claimed the whites invented AIDS to kill blacks?  Did the media talk about how Kerry lied about his participation in Vietnam, or were the 260 plus veterans lying about this wanna be hero?  They had mixed party affiliations, so what could be the reason? Did they ever mention John Kennedy's prostitutes or drug usage? What about Clinton, the Bill version, who went from woman-to-woman faster than he ditched his famous cigar? No, they buried that story when they had to, and went on Republican fishing expeditions instead. And when they couldn't prove G.W. Bush had a extra-marital relationship with some woman, did they retract the story? No. They never do, because once the damage is done, the emotions have already kicked in, decisions about the person have been made, so the truth just dries up and goes away.


The scariest thing about today's United States isn't simply that we have an anti-Semite/pro-Islamic president who balances the budget like Inspector Clousseau balancing 100 spinning dishes. The scariest  thing is that our values have been compromised. We cannot even trust election results, and we trust, even less, what our liberal politicians tell us. We certainly cannot trust the MSM if you're an objective person. The left laughs at people like Glenn Beck when he gets all teary-bleary talking about America. The left believes that America is nothing any more special than any other nation--Obama said that--it's called internationalism.  The right says America is the greatest country on earth--not perfect, simply the best; and that's the truth, period.


It's time for the MSM to hit the road and make room for the truth . . . because we can handle the truth and we hunger for it. Obama would have us all share our wealth, no matter how hard we've worked for it individually. It's ideas we should be sharing, and doing that with total freeedom of speech, good and bad. And if we need to remedy what we don't agree with, or don't want to hear, then we remedy it with more speech, not with a law calling it "hate speech." Obama is a socialist and he is very very dangerous to the American way of life.